(Hypertension. 1998;32:1071-1076.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (P.P., T.T., P.S.), and Department of Pharmacology (P.P., F.G.M.R., P.S.), University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London, UK (A.D.H.).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hydrochlorothiazide indapamide vasodilation human potassium channels hypertension, essential Gitelman syndrome
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In animal and human isolated resistance arteries, hydrochlorothiazide exerts a dose-dependent direct vasodilator effect at therapeutically relevant concentrations. Since it is unknown whether the Na-Cl cotransporter is also present in vascular smooth muscle cells, inhibition of this cotransporter, the primary site of action in the kidney, has not been associated with the direct vascular effects of hydrochlorothiazide. Studies investigating the mechanism of this action revealed that it depended on activation of vascular potassium channels.9 10 The type of potassium channel activated appears to be the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium (KCa) channel since the vascular action of thiazides is inhibited by KCa blockers like tetraethylammonium (TEA),11 charybdotoxin,9 10 12 and iberiotoxin9 but not by blockers of other vascular potassium channels.9 10
In a previous in vivo study, the direct vasoactivity of hydrochlorothiazide could not be confirmed in the human forearm.13 Among other reasons, dosage of hydrochlorothiazide and initial level of blood pressure may have influenced the results, since the antihypertensive action is related to the initial blood pressure.14
Since indapamide is a thiazide-like agent with antihypertensive properties at doses that provoke minimal diuretic effects,15 its mode of action is thought to be due to a combined diuretic and vasodilator effect. Low urinary excretion and specific accumulation into arterial smooth muscle of this lipophilic molecule may provide a rationale for this profile. The vasodilator effect of indapamide has been demonstrated in various animal studies but was not confirmed in isolated human resistance arteries.16
We wished to investigate the presence and mechanism of a direct vascular effect of hydrochlorothiazide at high concentrations in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Experiments with the potassium channel antagonist TEA and experiments in patients with the Gitelman syndrome17 18 19 enabled us to investigate the role of KCa channel activation and Na-Cl cotransporter in the direct vascular action of hydrochlorothiazide. Furthermore, we wanted to compare the effects of hydrochlorothiazide with the thiazide-like agent indapamide, for which a vascular action is claimed to be even more pronounced.15
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demographic characteristics of all groups are summarized in the
Table
. Healthy volunteers and
hypertensive patients who were taking prescription drugs (except for
oral contraceptives), aspirin, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs were excluded. Patients with the Gitelman syndrome ended their
use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 2 days before the
experiment but continued their other medications (magnesium carbonate,
potassium tablets, clomipramine, amiloride, and diazepam). Participants
were asked to refrain from drinking alcohol or caffeine-containing
beverages for at least 24 hours before their studies.
|
Procedures
After local anesthesia (lidocaine 2%) was induced,
the left brachial artery was cannulated with a 20-gauge catheter
(Angiocath, Deseret Medical, Becton Dickinson) for drug infusion
(automatic syringe infusion pump, type STC-521, Terumo) and blood
pressure monitoring (Hewlett Packard GmbH). All blood pressures
mentioned were acquired from these intra-arterial
measurements. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was determined
by the electronically integrated area under the brachial
arterial pulse-wave curve and averaged per forearm blood
flow (FBF) measurement. A second catheter was inserted in a deep
ipsilateral antecubital vein to obtain venous blood samples during the
last minute of each infusion. Plasma concentrations of
hydrochlorothiazide and indapamide were measured by
high-performance liquid chromatography
according to a previously described method.20 At
least 30 minutes after intra-arterial cannulation and 1
minute after occlusion of the hand circulation (inflation of a wrist
cuff to 200 mm Hg), FBF was measured in both arms 3 times a
minute by ECG-triggered venous occlusion plethysmography with the use
of mercury-in-Silastic strain gauges (Hokanson EC4, DE
Hokanson).21 The upper arm collecting cuffs were
simultaneously inflated to 45 to 50 mm Hg with a
rapid cuff inflator (Hokanson E-20). FBF and drug administration
(automatic syringe infusion pump, type STC-521, Terumo) were normalized
to forearm volume as measured with the water displacement method and
expressed in milliliters per minute per deciliter. Baseline FBF was
measured for 5 minutes, during which vehicle control was infused, after
which the increasing dosages of hydrochlorothiazide,
indapamide, or norepinephrine were administrated in a
single-blind manner for 5 minutes each. Each measurement period lasted
maximally 10 minutes and was alternated by a 5-minute pause, during
which the wrist cuff was deflated to allow recovery of the hand
circulation. The mean FBF of the last 2 minutes recorded at each
infusion rate was taken as the response and used for further
analysis. In the normotensive group, infusion of the highest
dose of indapamide was continued for 20 minutes instead of 5
minutes.
Protocols
Direct Vascular Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide
Four protocols with hydrochlorothiazide were
conducted.
Protocol A1: Effect of Hydrochlorothiazide
in Normotensive and Hypertensive Subjects
In 6 normotensive subjects and in 6 hypertensive patients,
hydrochlorothiazide was infused
intra-arterially at a rate of 8, 25, and 75 µg ·
min-1 · dL-1. The
patients with essential hypertension were newly diagnosed or
discontinued their medication 4 weeks before entering the study.
Protocol A2: Effect of Hydrochlorothiazide
on Norepinephrine-Induced Vasoconstriction
Long-term treatment with thiazides inhibits the vasoconstrictor
action of norepinephrine in both normotensive and
hypertensive subjects.22 23 To examine the acute
effects of hydrochlorothiazide at a therapeutic plasma
concentration, we assessed the vasoconstrictor response to
intra-arterially administered norepinephrine
(10, 30, and 100 ng · min-1 ·
dL-1) before and after local administration of
hydrochlorothiazide (1.0 µg ·
min-1 · dL-1) in 6
normotensive volunteers. There was a 30-minute pause between the 2
norepinephrine dose-response curves, and
hydrochlorothiazide infusion was initiated before the
second norepinephrine dose-response curve. Previous
experiments revealed that intra-arterial infusion of this
hydrochlorothiazide dose did not change basal FBF and
led to clinically relevant concentration in the infused
forearm.13
Protocol A3: Involvement of Potassium Channel Activation in
Hydrochlorothiazide-Induced Vasodilation
In vitro studies indicate that
hydrochlorothiazide-induced vasoactivity is mediated by
KCa channel opening. Since charybdotoxin and
iberiotoxin (the 2 most selective blockers of the
KCa channel) are too toxic for human application,
we chose TEA to investigate the role of KCa
channel activation in the vascular effects of
hydrochlorothiazide. TEA has been used as a ganglion
blocker in a total dose of 500 mg IV in patients with
peripheral vascular disease24 and
normal subjects.25 TEA antagonizes different
types of potassium channels with varying degrees of
potency,26 but the compound has been shown to
selectively block single KCa channels in
arterial smooth muscle at concentrations <1
mmol · L-1.26 27
In the normotensive group of protocol A2 (n=6), we administered TEA
intra-arterially at an infusion rate of 0.1 mg ·
min-1 · dL-1,
calculated to lead to a local plasma concentration of
0.5
mmol · L-1. The
hydrochlorothiazide dose-response curve was repeated
after a pause of 30 minutes and 10 minutes of local TEA administration.
TEA administration was continued during the
hydrochlorothiazide infusions.
In a previous study we found that sodium nitroprussideinduced vasodilation was not inhibited by TEA, indicating that TEA is not a nonspecific inhibitor of vasodilation (P. Pickkers, unpublished data, 1998).
Protocol A4: Involvement of Inhibition of Vascular Na-Cl
Cotransport in Hydrochlorothiazide-Induced
Vasodilation
The renal effects of hydrochlorothiazide are the
result of inhibition of the electroneutral Na-Cl cotransporter in the
early segment of the distal tubule.28 The
presence of this cotransporter in vascular smooth muscle cells and its
possible role in modulation of vascular tone have not been determined.
Two patients with the Gitelman syndrome who lack the NaCl
cotransporter18 19 were studied during protocol
A2, as described above.
Direct Vascular Effects of Indapamide
Protocol B1: Effect of High-Dose Indapamide in Normotensive and
Hypertensive Subjects
Analogous to protocol A2 (see above), indapamide (8, 25, and 75
µg · min-1 ·
dL-1) was infused
intra-arterially in 6 normotensive and 6 hypertensive
subjects. A previous set of experiments in normotensive volunteers
using intra-arterial infusion rates of 0.1 to 10 µg
· min-1 · dL-1
revealed that this concentration range did not change FBF (n=6; data
not shown).
Drugs and Solutions
On the day of use, hydrochlorothiazide,
indapamide, and TEA were reconstituted from a sterile powder (Sigma),
diluted in NaHCO3 1.4%
(hydrochlorothiazide) or NaCl 0.9% (indapamide and
TEA) to a concentration of 0.1, 0.1, and 1.0 mg ·
mL-1, respectively, and passed through a
0.22-µm Millipore filter. Further dilutions were prepared immediately
before the experiment. Norepinephrine (ampule 1 mg ·
mL-1) was also freshly dissolved in NaCl 0.9%
just before the experiment.
Data Analysis, Calculations, and Statistics
The effects of hydrochlorothiazide and
indapamide were analyzed by comparing the
hemodynamic variables at baseline and at the
increasing dosages by 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Post hoc
comparisons between the different dosages were made by Student's
t tests, including Bonferroni correction. Paired Student's
t tests were used for the assessment of the effect of TEA on
baseline parameters. To evaluate the effect of potassium
channel blockade on the hydrochlorothiazide responses,
2-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on the changes from
baseline.
Comparisons of the effects between different groups was performed by 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures. The mean FBF of the last 2 minutes recorded at each infusion rate was taken as the response. Changes in FBF were compared with values obtained during baseline measurements and expressed as percent change in ratio of the infused and noninfused arms compared with the baseline ratio to correct for small baseline differences between the first and second parts of the experiment. By using the ratio of the FBF measurements, the noninfused arm can be considered a contemporaneous control for the infused arm.29
All data are expressed as mean±SEM of n experiments, unless indicated otherwise. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Local infusion of norepinephrine into the brachial artery attenuated FBF dose dependently (baseline FBF, 2.2±0.3 in the infused arm and 2.0±0.3 mL · min-1 · dL-1 in the noninfused arm), with no effects on FBF in the noninfused arm, blood pressure (MAP, from 82±5 to 84±4 mm Hg), and heart rate (from 53±9 to 52±9 bpm). This vasoconstriction was not inhibited by local infusion of hydrochlorothiazide (vasoconstriction induced by 10, 30, and 100 ng · min-1 · dL-1 norepinephrine alone, 53±7%, 63±8%, and 77±5%, compared with norepinephrine in the presence of hydrochlorothiazide, 58±4%, 58±7%, and 74±5%; P=NS).
Mechanism of Action of
Hydrochlorothiazide-Induced Vasodilation
Role of KCa Channel Activation
Figure 2
demonstrates the inhibition
of hydrochlorothiazide-induced vasodilation by TEA. TEA
infusion into the brachial artery had no significant effect on baseline
FBF (n=6; from 1.9±0.2 to 1.9±0.2 mL ·
min-1 · dL-1 after
10 minutes; P=NS). Some subjects who were infused with TEA
experienced paresthesia in the infused arm. In addition, fasciculations
of the forearm muscles were occasionally observed. All symptoms
disappeared within 10 minutes after termination of the TEA infusion.
Throughout these experiments, there were no significant changes in
contralateral FBF, blood pressure, and heart rate (data not shown).
|
Hydrochlorothiazide-induced vasodilation in the normotensive subjects was significantly attenuated when the dose-response curve was repeated in the presence of TEA (-7±4%, -9±9%, and 13±10% difference; P=0.02 compared with hydrochlorothiazide-induced vasodilation in the absence of TEA; see above).
Role of Na-Cl Cotransport Inhibition
In 2 patients with the Gitelman syndrome, basal blood pressure,
heart rate, and FBF in the infused and noninfused arms were
104±7/58±6 mm Hg, 66±0.3 bpm, 1.6±0.4 mL ·
min-1 · dL-1, and
2.5±0.1 mL · min-1 ·
dL-1, respectively.
Hydrochlorothiazide infusions increased FBF in the
infused forearm (vasodilation in patient 1, 23%, 39%, and 100%;
vasodilation in patient 2, 4%, -4%, and 26%), with no relevant
effects on blood flow in the noninfused arm and the other
hemodynamic parameters (Figure 1
, left
panel). The vasodilation in these 2 patients was not significantly
different from that in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.
Effects of Indapamide in Normotensive and Hypertensive
Subjects
During intra-arterial infusion of indapamide (infusion
rate of 8, 25, and 75 µg · min-1
· dL-1), plasma concentrations of indapamide
were 0.45±0.06, 0.98±0.19, and 7.22±1.54 µg ·
mL-1. Figure 1
(right panel) illustrates the
vascular effects of intrabrachial infusion of these dosages of
indapamide. No hemodynamic (blood pressure and heart
rate) or direct vascular (FBF) effects were observed in normotensive
subjects (blood pressure, 129±3/68±3 mm Hg) or in hypertensive
patients (blood pressure, 161±13/91±5 mm Hg). Sustained
infusion of the highest indapamide dose for 20 minutes did not change
FBF.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although vascular effects of thiazide diuretics were suspected almost from their introduction in the late 1950s,22 23 no direct in vivo evidence was available. In experiments in which plasma volume and total peripheral vascular resistance were calculated before and after long-term treatment with hydrochlorothiazide, it was found that after weeks to months of treatment plasma volume returned to baseline values, whereas blood pressure was still suppressed.1 2 3 This indicated an attenuated peripheral resistance and thus vasodilation. Since then, there have been speculations regarding whether this action is due to a direct interaction with the vascular wall4 5 22 or secondary to the initial renal salt loss.6 7 8
Previous studies have shown that long-term treatment with
hydrochlorothiazide attenuated the
vasoconstrictive effects of norepinephrine
in both normal and hypertensive subjects.22 23
Various mechanisms of action could be responsible for this effect, eg,
a direct interaction with the
-receptor or through modulation of
catecholamine plasma levels or the sympathetic nerve
system. Our study indicates that there is no direct interaction between
the
-receptor and hydrochlorothiazide. In addition,
various in vitro studies with isolated animal and human resistance
arteries have demonstrated convincingly that
hydrochlorothiazide and related compounds exert a
direct vasodilator effect.9 10 11 12 16 Subsequent
experiments showed that this effect was mediated by opening of vascular
calcium-activated potassium channels, resulting in
hyperpolarization and reduction in intracellular
calcium in the smooth muscle cell. The present study provides the
first evidence that in vivo hydrochlorothiazide is also
able to exert a direct vasodilator effect through activation of
vascular potassium channels, independent of its renal effects.
Mechanism of Action of
Hydrochlorothiazide-Induced Vasodilation
The principal renal site of hydrochlorothiazide
action is the electroneutral Na-Cl cotransporter in the distal
tubule.28 To our knowledge, it is unknown whether
this cotransporter is also present in vascular smooth muscle cells
and whether it is of importance in the vascular action of
hydrochlorothiazide. Patients with the rare disease
known as Gitelman syndrome are characterized by the absence of the
thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter.18 Since
the vasodilator effect of hydrochlorothiazide was in
the same order of magnitude in 2 of these patients compared with the
the controls, we conclude that presence of the Na-Cl cotransporter does
not play an important role in this effect.
A wide range of vasodilatory compounds of different chemical structure have been found to act by opening of potassium channels.30 31 The direct vasodilator actions of thiazide diuretics on isolated vessels are associated with an increase in Rb+ efflux (as a marker for K+ efflux)10 32 and hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane and are inhibited by selective blockers of the KCa channel.9 10 11 12 From these experiments, the role of vascular potassium channel activation in the direct vascular activity of hydrochlorothiazide is evident. The present study provides evidence that the mechanism of action described in vitro is also operational in vivo.
The most important questionwhether this direct vascular effect contributes to blood pressurelowering efficacyremains unanswered for several reasons. First, vasodilation in vivo is only achieved at plasma concentrations of hydrochlorothiazide that are higher than those normally reached during long-term oral treatment. However, both hydrochlorothiazide and indapamide are known to accumulate in vascular smooth muscle cells,15 and the antihypertensive action of hydrochlorothiazide is of slow onset. In our experimental setup, higher plasma concentrations might be needed to reach similar drug concentrations in the vascular smooth muscle cell compared with long-term systemic treatment with lower dosages. Somewhat counter to this view is the fact that the increase in FBF after hydrochlorothiazide administration reached steady state within 1 to 2 minutes, and prolongation of the highest dose of indapamide to 20 minutes had no additional effect. However, accumulation of the diuretics in vascular smooth muscle may take days to weeks rather than minutes. Second, blood pressure reduction after long-term treatment with diuretics is related to the level of initial blood pressure.14 By contrast, in our studies hydrochlorothiazide tended to induce less vasodilation in hypertensive patients, and we found no correlation between the initial blood pressure or forearm vascular resistance and the direct vascular effect of hydrochlorothiazide. It should be noted, however, that the hypertensive patients were significantly older that the normotensive controls and that factors such as age or endothelium damage may have influenced these results.
Whether the reduction in peripheral resistance after long-term therapy with hydrochlorothiazide is due to KCa channel activation is still unresolved. One option to investigate whether KCa channel activation is an important component in the reduction of peripheral resistance after long-term therapy with hydrochlorothiazide would be to assess the effect of potassium channel blockade on basal FBF. In our experiments, TEA had no significant effect on basal FBF, whereas under conditions when the KCa channel is activated, TEA may reduce FBF. This approach to demonstrate potassium channel activation has been reported before, since TEA had no effect on basal vascular tone of coronary arteries in the nonischemic myocardium but significantly reduced coronary blood flow in the ischemic heart, indicating that ischemia activates vascular potassium channels.33 Therefore, if long-term treatment with hydrochlorothiazide reduces peripheral vascular resistance by increasing the open-state probability of KCa channels in vascular smooth muscle cells, intra-arterial administration of an antagonist (eg, TEA) should decrease FBF.
Although the observed vasodilator action of hydrochlorothiazide is small, one should realize that the diuretic effects of hydrochlorothiazide prevent the normal counterregulatory effects of vasodilators, such as fluid and sodium retention. Therefore, a small vasodilator effect associated with the absence of counterregulatory sodium retention may well explain the efficacy of thiazides in the treatment of hypertension.
Indapamide
A wealth of data from animal experiments and clinical
pharmacological studies, including long-term therapeutic trials, has
established extensive knowledge of the vascular activity of indapamide.
Nevertheless, direct indapamide-induced vasoactivity measured in humans
in vivo has never been reported. Indapamide has been reported to
increase resting muscle blood flow by 38% after 1 week of systemic
treatment in patients with essential hypertension, as measured with a
xenon washout technique,34 but whether this
effect is due to a direct or indirect (eg, counterregulatory) effect is
unclear. Data from in vitro experiments with animal tissue have shown
that indapamide directly acts on vascular smooth muscle by inhibiting
the slow inward calcium current.35 This results
in a reduced 45Ca2+ uptake
in arteries stimulated with norepinephrine or a
depolarizing potassium solution36 and
vasorelaxation at concentrations similar to those seen therapeutically
in blood (IC50=80 nmol ·
L-1).16 In these
experiments, indapamide seems to exert calcium channel
antagonistic effects. In contrast to the aforementioned
results obtained from animal experiments, the lack of a direct vascular
effect of indapamide in our experiments is in agreement with data from
studies with isolated arteries of human origin.16
It appears that species differences explain these contradictory results
and that human vessels may not be sensitive to indapamide. Our
experiments exclude the presence of an acute, direct vascular effect of
therapeutic and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations of indapamide in
the human forearm of normotensive and hypertensive subjects.
In conclusion, we found that similar to in vitro experiments, hydrochlorothiazide exerts a direct vascular effect in vivo, probably mediated by activation of vascular potassium channels and unrelated to the presence of the Na-Cl cotransporter. This direct interaction of hydrochlorothiazide with the vascular wall could contribute to its antihypertensive efficacy. Whether this mechanism is of importance during long-term systemic treatment remains to be established.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 25, 1998; first decision March 24, 1998; accepted August 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. You, C. Cochain, C. Loinard, J. Vilar, B. Mees, M. Duriez, B. I. Levy, and J.-S. Silvestre Combination of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Perindopril and the Diuretic Indapamide Activate Postnatal Vasculogenesis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2008; 325(3): 766 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lorenzo and C. T. Minson Human cutaneous reactive hyperaemia: role of BKCa channels and sensory nerves J. Physiol., November 15, 2007; 585(1): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Adrogue and N. E. Madias Sodium and Potassium in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension N. Engl. J. Med., May 10, 2007; 356(19): 1966 - 1978. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bellien, R. Joannides, M. Iacob, P. Arnaud, and C. Thuillez Evidence for a basal release of a cytochrome-related endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in the radial artery in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1347 - H1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gamba Molecular Physiology and Pathophysiology of Electroneutral Cation-Chloride Cotransporters Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 423 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhu, S. Zhu, D. Liu, T. Cao, L. Wang, and M. Tepel Thiazide-Like Diuretics Attenuate Agonist-Induced Vasoconstriction by Calcium Desensitization Linked to Rho Kinase Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 233 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D Hughes How do thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics lower blood pressure? Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2004; 5(4): 155 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S U Shah, S Anjum, and W A Littler Use of diuretics in cardiovascular disease: (2) hypertension Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 2004; 80(943): 271 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S U Shah, S Anjum, and W A Littler Use of diuretics in cardiovascular diseases: (1) heart failure Postgrad. Med. J., April 1, 2004; 80(942): 201 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inokuchi, Y. Hirooka, H. Shimokawa, K. Sakai, T. Kishi, K. Ito, Y. Kimura, and A. Takeshita Role of Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor in Human Forearm Circulation Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 919 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. H. Honing, P. Smits, P. J. Morrison, J. C. Burnett Jr, and T. J. Rabelink C-Type Natriuretic Peptide-Induced Vasodilation Is Dependent On Hyperpolarization in Human Forearm Resistance Vessels Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1179 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. H. Honing, P. Smits, P. J. Morrison, and T. J. Rabelink Bradykinin-Induced Vasodilation of Human Forearm Resistance Vessels Is Primarily Mediated by Endothelium-Dependent Hyperpolarization Hypertension, June 1, 2000; 35(6): 1314 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uzu and G. Kimura Diuretics Shift Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure From Nondipper to Dipper in Essential Hypertension Circulation, October 12, 1999; 100(15): 1635 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Vazquez, A. Monroy, E. Dorantes, R. A. Munoz-Clares, and G. Gamba Functional differences between flounder and rat thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): F599 - F607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |