(Hypertension. 1999;33:347-353.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Howard Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Correspondence to Jialong Zhuo, MD, PhD, Howard Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. E-mail jlz{at}hfi.unimelb.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: angiotensin II receptors, angiotensin Ren-2 gene renal cortical and medullary blood flows
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, recent evidence suggests that the abnormal regulation of local angiotensin formation in the kidney also plays an important role in the pathogenesis of severe hypertension in TGR rats.8 9 10 Renal Ang II appears to mediate the marked right shift of pressure natriuresis response curve to a higher arterial pressure9 and to the enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness in TGR rats.11 Moreover, despite severe hypertension and suppressed renal renin expression, the levels of plasma and kidney Ang II have been reported to be normal10 or even markedly elevated8 in TGR rats. These observations indicate that intrarenal Ang II formation and its receptors in these transgenic rats are not under an appropriate negative feedback regulation. The primary aim of this study therefore was to examine whether there was an abnormal change of AT1 and AT2 receptors or altered renal hemodynamic and excretory responses to blockade of these receptors in anesthetized TGR(mRen-2)27 hypertensive rats compared with their normotensive counterparts, transgene-negative SD rats.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12 weeks old), age-matched homozygous
transgenic Ren-2 hypertensive rats and 15 normotensive SD
rats were used in the present study. TGR rats, which were initially
obtained from Dr D. Ganten of the Max-Delbruch Center for Molecular
Medicine, Berlin-Buch, Germany, are now maintained in the Department of
Physiology, The University of Melbourne. Homozygous TGR rats are
routinely treated with lisinopril to control hypertension,
but in this study to exclude the influences of ACE inhibition on
circulating and tissue renin-angiotensin systems (RAS) as
well as on renal function, lisinopril was withdrawn 3 weeks
before experiments were performed. Both TGR and SD rats were maintained
on a normal rat diet and allowed free access to tap water. This study
was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Howard
Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology and Medicine.
Measurement of Plasma Renin Activity, Ang I, and Ang II
Plasma levels of the components of the circulating RAS were
measured by radioimmunoassay as described.12 Briefly,
after decapitation, 2 mL of trunk blood samples were collected from TGR
(n=8) and SD (n=8) rats into chilled tubes containing heparin for
assays of plasma renin activity (PRA) or into tubes containing a
BAL/EDTA mixture for radioimmunoassays of plasma Ang I and Ang
II.12 Blood samples were promptly centrifuged at
3000g for 15 minutes at 4°C, and the plasma was collected
and stored at -80°C for later
radioimmunoassays.12
Measurement of AT1 and AT2 Receptors by
Quantitative In Vitro Autoradiography
Measurement and characterization of renal
AT1 and AT2 receptors were
performed using in vitro autoradiography and the
radioligand
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II (Peninsula Laboratories), as described previously.16
Frozen kidney sections (20 µm thick) of TGR and SD rats were
first preincubated in 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4,
for 15 minutes to remove endogenous Ang II, which binds to
its receptors. The sections were then incubated for 1 hour in the same
fresh buffer containing
100 pmol/L
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II at 22°C. In all cases, both radioligand and agonist or
antagonists were added into the buffer
simultaneously. Nonspecific binding was determined in
parallel incubations containing an excess concentration (1
µmol/L) of unlabeled Ang II (Hypertensin, Ciba Pharmaceuticals).
AT1 receptors were determined in the presence of
10 µmol/L of the AT2 receptor
antagonist PD 123319, while AT2
receptors were measured in the presence of 10 µmol/L of the
AT1 receptor antagonist
losartan. Binding specificities of AT1
and AT2 receptors were examined in duplicate
binding competition experiments, in which various concentrations of
unlabeled Ang II, losartan, and PD 123319 were added into the
incubation buffer.13 After incubation and subsequent
washes, the sections were loaded into x-ray cassettes together with a
set of 125I-radioactivity standards and exposed
to x-ray films (Agfa-Gaevert) for 7 days. The films were then developed
and autoradiographs analyzed by computerized densitometry
(MCID, Imaging Research Inc) as described.13
Cellular Localization of AT1 Receptor Labeling by
Immunohistochemistry
To provide cellular localization of AT1
receptors in TGR and SD rat kidneys, immunohistochemistry was performed
using a polyclonal antibody generated against the amino acid sequence
15-24, Ac-QDDCPKAGRHC-NH2, of the human
AT1 receptor as described
previously.14 Serial frozen sections, 8 µm thick,
from SD and TGR rats were incubated overnight with the primary antibody
at 4°C for positive controls, and nonimmune rabbit serum was used on
adjacent sections as negative controls. The labeled streptavidin-biotin
complex system with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbozole development was used as
described.15 All sections were stained with hematoxylin
and eosin before histological examination.
Effects of AT1 and AT2 Receptor Blockade on
Renal Cortical and Medullary Perfusion
Because receptor mapping experiments revealed significant
increases in AT1 receptors in the cortex and the
inner stripe of the outer medulla of TGR rats compared with
normotensive SD rats, renal cortical and medullary
hemodynamic and tubular excretory responses to the
AT1 receptor antagonist
losartan (a gift of DuPont Merck Pharmaceuticals Co) and the
AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (a
gift of Parke-Davis) were compared in separate groups of
anesthetized TGR and SD rats (n=7) using a laser-Doppler
flowmeter as described.16 All rats were
anesthetized with pentobarbitone (Nembutal, 100 mg/kg IP) and
prepared for a standard renal clearance experiment.17 The
right jugular vein was cannulated for infusions of saline, clearance
markers, and drugs, while the right carotid artery was cannulated for
blood sampling and for monitoring blood pressure. The left kidney was
exposed through a left flank incision and placed in a
micropuncture cup. Laser-Doppler probes were inserted into the
cortex (
2 mm deep) and into the inner stripe of the outer
medulla (
5 mm deep), respectively, for monitoring renal
cortical and medullary blood flows using a laser-Doppler flowmeter
(floLAB laser Doppler, Moor Instruments Ltd). Arterial
blood pressure, heart rate, and renal cortical and medullary blood
flows were continuously recorded using an 8-channel PowerLab data
acquisition system interfaced with a Microsoft Work Station 4.0
(ADInstruments Ltd). The hemodynamic variables were
analyzed using the Chart for Windows Data Analysis
System.
On completion of surgical procedures, animals were infused intravenously with saline at 30 µL/min containing 1% para-aminohippuric acid (PAH, Sigma) and 8% inulin for estimation of whole-kidney renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), respectively, as described.17 The rats were allowed to stabilize for at least 60 minutes before they were subjected to the following protocol: -30 minutes recordings under basal conditions, followed by two further 30-minute periods after administration of the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (5 mg/kg bolus followed by constant infusion of 50 µg/kg per minute IV); the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan was then added to the infusion (5 mg/kg bolus followed by constant infusion of 50 µg/kg per minute IV). The chosen doses of PD 123319 and losartan have been shown to completely abolish AT1 and AT2 receptor binding in the rat kidneys and adrenal glands18 or to inhibit Ang IIinduced pressor and renal hemodynamic responses after intravenous administration.17 An additional group of TGR rats (n=5) were infused with saline and clearance markers only throughout the experiment for time control. Arterial pressure, heart rate, and renal cortical and medullary blood flows were continuously recorded throughout the experiment. Arterial blood samples and urine samples were collected through the carotid arterial catheter and a bladder catheter, respectively.
Data Analysis and Statistics
Data are presented as the mean±SEM. Urine volume was
determined gravimetrically, and concentrations of sodium and potassium
in plasma and urine were measured by flame photometry (model IL943,
Instrumentation Laboratories). Whole-kidney RPF was estimated by PAH
clearance, while GFR was measured by inulin clearance as
described.17 The differences between experimental periods
within the group were compared using 1-way ANOVA with repeated
comparisons (Tukey test). The differences between TGR rats and their
time controls, and differences between TGR rats and SD rats on the same
corresponding parameters, or experimental periods, were
analyzed using Student's unpaired t test.
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AT1 and AT2 Receptor Binding in the Kidneys
of TGR and SD Rats
As expected, Ang II receptors in the kidneys of both TGR rats and
SD rats were predominantly of the AT1 subtype,
while AT2 receptor binding was very low to
undetectable in both strains. The distribution and quantification of
AT1 receptors in the kidneys of both SD rats and
TGR rats are shown in Figures 1
and 2
, respectively. Despite severe
hypertension and increased plasma Ang II concentration in TGR rats,
AT1 receptor binding at all sites in the kidney,
including glomeruli, proximal tubules, and the inner stripe of the
outer medulla, was significantly higher in TGR rats compared with that
in SD rats (Figures 1B
and 2
). In TGR rats,
immunohistochemistry shows strong AT1 receptor
labeling on vascular smooth muscle cells of large and small intrarenal
blood vessels including afferent and efferent arterioles and
juxtaglomerular apparatus, and moderate
labeling in glomerular mesangial cells adjacent
to the vascular pole and in proximal tubular epithelia (Figure 1C
). A similar pattern of AT1 receptor
distribution also occurred in the SD rat kidney, but it was not
possible to quantify the differences in AT1
receptor protein by immunohistochemistry.
|
|
Binding competition experiments in vitro revealed higher inhibitory potencies of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan to displace 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding in the glomeruli and the inner stripe of the outer medulla of TGR rats than those of SD rats (P<0.05).125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding curves in the presence of losartan were about one log-order more to the left in TGR rats than in SD rats (not shown). However, the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 was without any effect on 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding at concentrations as high as 10 µmol/L.
Cardiovascular Responses to Blockade of
AT1 and AT2 Receptors
In SD rats, blockade of the AT2 receptors
with PD 123319 had no effect on MAP, whereas the same dose of
losartan decreased MAP by
17 mm Hg
(P<0.05; Figure 3
). In TGR
rats, PD 123319 caused a slight but not significant fall in MAP (PD,
170±10 mm Hg; NS), whereas losartan markedly decreased
MAP by >55 mm Hg to a level similar to basal MAP observed in SD
rats (128±6 mm Hg; P<0.001). Heart rate was not
altered by PD 123319 or losartan in either SD rats or TGR rats.
There were no significant changes in MAP and heart rate in TGR time
controls.
|
Cortical and Medullary Hemodynamic and Tubular
Responses to Blockade of AT1 and AT2
Receptors
Basal renal functional parameters in TGR and SD rats
are shown in the Table
. Compared with SD
rats, TGR rats had significantly higher basal urine flow rate, urinary
sodium excretion, and GFR and RPF (Table
). TGR rats also showed
higher renal cortical (CBF) and inner stripe of outer medullary blood
flows (MBF) than SD rats as measured by laser-Doppler
flowmetry (Table
). Blockade of the
AT2 receptor with PD 123319 did not significantly
alter either cortical or medullary perfusion in either strain (Figure 3
). By contrast, AT1 receptor blockade
with losartan caused significant increases in CBF by 20% and
30% in SD and TGR rats, respectively, whereas MBF was increased only
in TGR rats (Figure 3
). Interestingly, losartan
increased whole-kidney GFR and RPF and enhanced urinary water and
sodium excretion in SD rats, but it significantly reduced GFR and
urinary sodium and potassium excretion without altering RPF and urine
flow rate in TGR rats (Table
). In TGR time controls, all renal
hemodynamic and tubular functional
parameters remained unaltered throughout the
experiment.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the interesting findings in the present study is that
despite fulminant hypertension accompanied by increased plasma levels
of renin and Ang II, AT1 receptor binding was
significantly increased in the kidneys of TGR rats compared with those
of SD rats as measured by quantitative in vitro
autoradiography (Figures 1
and 2
).
Increased AT1 receptors occurred at all anatomic
sites, namely the glomeruli, the interglomerular region
corresponding to proximal tubules, and the inner stripe of the outer
medulla. Further immunohistochemistry revealed strong
AT1 receptor labeling in vascular smooth muscle
cells of large and small intrarenal blood vessels including afferent
and efferent arterioles, juxtaglomerular
apparatus, glomerular mesangial
cells particularly close to the vascular pole of the glomerulus, and in
proximal tubules (Figure 2
). However, we found no significant
AT2 receptor binding at any of the renal sites in
either strain, consistent with our previous findings in normal
rats.13 This upregulation of AT1
receptors in the glomeruli and the inner stripe of the outer medulla
also occurs in the kidney of spontaneously hypertensive
rats21 (J.Z., unpublished observations, 1998) but has not
been reported in the kidney of TGR rats previously. In contrast, aortic
and cardiac AT1 receptor mRNA expression has been
reported to be downregulated in TGR rats.22
The increase in AT1 receptors in the TGR rat kidney in the present study was unexpected and intriguing given the fact that these rats exhibited higher circulating and intrarenal Ang II levels.8 10 20 It is well documented that AT1 receptors in blood vessels and the kidney are under negative feedback regulation by Ang II: high circulating and renal Ang II levels downregulate, whereas low concentrations of plasma and renal Ang II upregulate AT1 receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells, glomerular mesangial cells, and renomedullary interstitial cells (RMICs) of the kidney.23 24 By contrast, AT1 receptor mRNA expression appears to be upregulated by high levels of Ang II in isolated or cultured proximal tubular cells.23 25 The negative feedbackregulating mechanism of AT1 receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells, mesangial cells, and RMICs may be important in maintaining normal blood pressure and body salt and fluid homeostasis. Our results indicate that TGR rats are unable to respond effectively to increased circulating and tissue Ang II levels to reduce AT1 receptors and/or AT1 receptor response to Ang II in the presence of severe hypertension. Such an abnormal regulation of kidney AT1 receptors may therefore contribute at least partly to the maintenance of fulminant hypertension in TGR rats.
In support of the in vitro findings, renal AT1
receptors in the TGR rats responded markedly to the
AT1 receptor antagonist
losartan in vivo in the present study. In
anesthetized TGR rats, losartan caused a marked fall in
MAP (>50 mm Hg) accompanied by significant increases in renal
cortical and medullary blood flows as monitored by laser-Doppler
flowmetry (Figure 3
). In contrast, although
losartan also lowered MAP and induced renal cortical
vasodilatation, the extents of these effects were much smaller in
normotensive SD rats (Figure 3
). Although laser-Doppler
flowmeters are widely used to monitor local tissue perfusion in the
kidney, some caution should be taken to interpret the
hemodynamic data as measured by this technique because
many factors other than red blood cell velocity also influence the
absolute voltage signals. However, basal RPF, expressed as gram of
kidney weight per minute, was also higher in TGR rats than in SD rats
in the present study. Furthermore, we found that changes in renal
cortical and medullary perfusion after losartan infusion,
expressed as percentage of increase from baseline, were also
proportional to those of the absolute voltage signals in the
present study. Thus, our data, obtained under similar experimental
conditions and protocols, are consistent with the proposition
that basal renal cortical and medullary perfusions were higher and
their subsequent responses to AT1 receptor
blockade were increased in the Ren-2 gene transgenic rats.
Interestingly, unlike SD rats in which losartan increased
whole-kidney GFR and RPF and induced diuresis and
natriuresis,17 blockade of the
AT1 receptors with losartan significantly
reduced GFR and urinary sodium and potassium excretion in TGR rats
without altering RPF and urine flow rate (Table
). These
observations are in good agreement with previous studies in the
contralateral kidney of 2-kidney, 1 clip Goldblatt hypertensive
rats26 and in the kidney of TGR rats, in which
antidiuresis and antinatriuresis occurred, or GFR fell, after
captopril or losartan treatment.4 27 Because GFR
and sodium and water excretion fell in parallel with a marked fall in
MAP, these effects were most likely pressure-dependent in TGR
rats.5 9 Similarly, the observed higher basal renal
hemodynamic and excretory function in TGR rats than in
SD rats (Table
) was also probably the result of severe
hypertension and increased renal perfusion pressure.
The present study was also designed to evaluate whether
AT2 receptors play functional roles in the
regulation of renal hemodynamics and urinary water and
electrolyte excretion in TGR hypertensive rats and their normotensive
counterparts. In our study, AT2 receptors exerted
no significant influences in MAP and renal hemodynamic
and tubular excretory responses in either TGR or SD rats (Figure 3
). These findings were consistent with receptor binding
data which showed a very low level of renal AT2
receptors in these animals. Recently, Nishioka et al19
reported that although blockade of AT2 receptors
with PD 123319 did not alter basal MAP in either TGR or SD rats, MAP
was significantly increased in TGR rats after PD 123319 and hypertonic
saline infusion were administered simultaneously. These
findings might suggest that AT2 receptors exert a
weak depressor role in TGR rats.19 However, we did not
observe a rise in MAP after PD 123319 infusion in either SD rats or TGR
rats. The reasons underlying these different conclusions are not known,
but the differences in phenotypes of the transgenic rats and in
experimental protocol used might account for the variance. Basal MAP
was much lower in TGR rats of that study (
120
mm Hg)19 than in those of the present study
(
190 mm Hg). Other factors (such as whether
conscious19 or anesthetized rats were used and
whether the rats were infused with isotonic or hypertonic
saline19) might have also contributed to the
differences in blood pressure response to PD 123319. However, our
receptor mapping studies detected no significant levels of
AT2 receptors in either TGR or SD rat kidney, nor
did we observe an inhibitory effect of PD 123319 on
displacing
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II binding even at concentrations as high as 10 µmol/L in
competition binding experiments. Therefore, our findings suggest that
AT2 receptor probably plays only a minor, if any,
physiological role in the regulation of renal
hemodynamics and tubular excretory function, although
AT2 receptors appear to mediate nitric oxide
production in the kidney of conscious SD
rats.28
In summary, the present study demonstrates that AT1 receptors were significantly increased in intrarenal blood vessels, glomerular mesangial cells, juxtaglomerular apparatus, proximal tubules, and renomedullary interstitial cells of the Ren-2 gene transgenic rat kidney. Moreover, in vivo blockade of the AT1 receptor with losartan produced a more pronounced antihypertensive effect and increases in renal cortical and medullary perfusion in these transgenic animals. Although the role of overexpression of the Ren-2 gene in extrarenal tissues in the development and maintenance of hypertension in this model is well recognized, our results suggest that increased AT1 receptors in multiple renal cells in the presence of fulminant hypertension and activated circulating and tissue RAS may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension in these rats. Because the present study was performed only in adult transgenic rats (>10 weeks old) with established phase of hypertension, increased AT1 receptors in the Ren-2 gene transgenic rat kidney therefore may occur only during the maintenance phase of hypertension. Whether increased AT1 receptors also occur in young Ren-2 gene transgenic rat kidney (<5 weeks old) during the development phase of hypertension remains to be further studied.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 16, 1998; first decision October 16, 1998; accepted October 28, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. C. Li and J. L. Zhuo Intracellular ANG II directly induces in vitro transcription of TGF-{beta}1, MCP-1, and NHE-3 mRNAs in isolated rat renal cortical nuclei via activation of nuclear AT1a receptors Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): C1034 - C1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. C. Li and J. L. Zhuo In vivo regulation of AT1a receptor-mediated intracellular uptake of [125I]Val5-ANG II in the kidneys and adrenals of AT1a receptor-deficient mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): F293 - F302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobori, M. Nangaku, L. G. Navar, and A. Nishiyama The Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System: From Physiology to the Pathobiology of Hypertension and Kidney Disease Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 251 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Backlund, P. Lakkisto, E. Palojoki, T. Gronholm, A. Saraste, P. Finckenberg, E. Mervaala, I. Tikkanen, and M. Laine Activation of protective and damaging components of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system after myocardial infarction in experimental diabetes Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Hayden, N. A. Chowdhury, S. A. Cooper, A. Whaley-Connell, J. Habibi, L. Witte, C. Wiedmeyer, C. M. Manrique, G. Lastra, C. Ferrario, et al. Proximal tubule microvilli remodeling and albuminuria in the Ren2 transgenic rat Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): F861 - F867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Whaley-Connell, N. A. Chowdhury, M. R. Hayden, C. S. Stump, J. Habibi, C. E. Wiedmeyer, P. E. Gallagher, E. Ann Tallant, S. A. Cooper, C. D. Link, et al. Oxidative stress and glomerular filtration barrier injury: role of the renin-angiotensin system in the Ren2 transgenic rat Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): F1308 - F1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. C. Li, O. A. Carretero, L. G. Navar, and J. L. Zhuo AT1 receptor-mediated accumulation of extracellular angiotensin II in proximal tubule cells: role of cytoskeleton microtubules and tyrosine phosphatases Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): F375 - F383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Zhuo, X. C. Li, J. L. Garvin, L. G. Navar, and O. A. Carretero Intracellular ANG II induces cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization by stimulating intracellular AT1 receptors in proximal tubule cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1382 - F1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Pendergrass, D. B. Averill, C. M. Ferrario, D. I. Diz, and M. C. Chappell Differential expression of nuclear AT1 receptors and angiotensin II within the kidney of the male congenic mRen2.Lewis rat Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1497 - F1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. C. Li, D. J. Campbell, M. Ohishi, S. Yuan, and J. L. Zhuo AT1 receptor-activated signaling mediates angiotensin IV-induced renal cortical vasoconstriction in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1024 - F1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rong, D. J. Campbell, and S. L. Skinner Hypertension in the (mRen-2)27 Rat Is Not Explained by Enhanced Kinetics of Transgenic Ren-2 Renin Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 523 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Zhuo, F. A.O. Mendelsohn, and M. Ohishi Perindopril Alters Vascular Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme, AT1 Receptor, and Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 634 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Zhuo, J. D. Imig, T. G. Hammond, S. Orengo, E. Benes, and L. G. Navar Ang II Accumulation in Rat Renal Endosomes During Ang II-Induced Hypertension: Role of AT1 Receptor Hypertension, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Uhlenius, O. Vuolteenaho, and I. Tikkanen Renin-angiotensin blockade improves renal cGMP production via non-AT2-receptor mediated mechanisms in hypertension-induced by chronic NOS inhibition in rat Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2001; 2(4): 233 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. A. Mervaala, Z. J. Cheng, I. Tikkanen, R. Lapatto, K. Nurminen, H. Vapaatalo, D. N. Muller, A. Fiebeler, U. Ganten, D. Ganten, et al. Endothelial Dysfunction and Xanthine Oxidoreductase Activity in Rats With Human Renin and Angiotensinogen Genes Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 414 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. J. Cheng, T. Vaskonen, I. Tikkanen, K. Nurminen, H. Ruskoaho, H. Vapaatalo, D. Muller, J.-K. Park, F. C. Luft, and E. M. A. Mervaala Endothelial Dysfunction and Salt-Sensitive Hypertension in Spontaneously Diabetic Goto-Kakizaki Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 433 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, J. Zhuo, H. Kobori, M. Ohishi, and L. G. Navar Intrarenal AT1 receptor and ACE binding in ANG II-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): F19 - F25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||