(Hypertension. 1999;33:569-574.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the MRC Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Correspondence to Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, 110 Pine Ave W, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2W 1R7. E-mail schiffe{at}IRCM.Umontreal.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: arteries, small remodeling elasticity elastic modulus collagen
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alterations in small artery mechanics may exacerbate vascular damage resulting from hemodynamic changes (for example, pulse pressure, wave reflection, and shear stress). An understanding of the former provides important mechanistic information for choosing therapeutic targets in hypertension. Mechanical properties may also provide a parameter that may eventually be useful for the noninvasive evaluation of cardiovascular risk. Some studies of human resistance arteries in which their structure has been elucidated in hypertensive patients are available,13 14 but little is known of the mechanical changes that follow the alterations in structure that occur in hypertension. Changes in wall mechanics (stiffness) of resistance arteries may influence pressure-diameter relationships of blood vessels. We hypothesized that as in rat models of hypertension, mechanical properties of human resistance arteries from patients with mild hypertension would not present abnormal stiffness despite altered structure. There is only one previous study in which mechanical properties of resistance arteries from patients with mild hypertension have been studied.15 It showed similar stiffness of wall components in resistance arteries from normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients, but that study was performed with the older technique of the wire myograph. There have been suggestions that the wire myograph may not accurately reflect properties of small arteries,16 although most of the data obtained with the wire myograph in studies of human small arteries have been reproduced in studies using more modern and physiological pressurized arteriographs.17 Therefore, to assess the mechanical properties of pressurized small arteries, we isolated small vessels (lumen diameter<300 µm) from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies performed on normotensive and hypertensive subjects and investigated their mechanics on a pressurized arteriograph. To understand mechanistically changes found in mechanical properties, we investigated the composition of the media of these resistance vessels by electron microscopy.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation and Study of Pressurized Small Arteries
Biopsies of gluteal subcutaneous fat were obtained from all
subjects by the same physician, with subjects under local
anesthesia. Superficial subcutaneous tissue (1.0x0.5x0.5
cm) was obtained through a horizontal 1-cm-long incision of the skin in
the upper external gluteal quadrant. Arteries were dissected from the
sample of subcutaneous tissue under a dissecting microscope immediately
after the biopsy was obtained, and 1 to 3 small arteries were chosen at
random and isolated. Arteries were mounted in a servo-controlled
pressurized myograph chamber, allowing a stable preset pressure as
previously described.9 The vessels were slipped onto two
glass microcannulas and secured with nylon ties. The axial length of
the vessel was adjusted by moving one cannula until the vessel walls
were parallel without stretch. Vessels were equilibrated under a
constant intraluminal pressure of 60 mm Hg for 1 hour with
physiological salt solution (PSS) (37°C) that was
continuously bubbled with 95% air and 5% CO2 to
achieve a pH of 7.40 to 7.45. PSS contained (mmol/L) NaCl 120,
NaHCO3 25, glucose 5.5, KCl 4.7,
CaCl2 2.5,
KH2PO4 1.2,
MgSO4 1.2, and EDTA 0.026. Vessels were
deactivated of myogenic tone by perfusion with
Ca2+-free PSS containing 10 mmol/L EGTA for
30 minutes. Lumen and media dimensions (for morphology) were measured
while the intraluminal pressure was 60 mm Hg. Intraluminal
pressure was then raised to 140 mm Hg three times, and the
cannula was adjusted until the artery walls were straight and parallel
to each other. Adjustments in length for the maintenance of
parallel walls were minimal.
For calculation of vessel mechanics, intraluminal pressure was increased at several intervals up to 140 mm Hg, as previously described,9 and media thickness and lumen diameter were measured at each pressure level at 5 points along the vessel. The precision of the system was 0.7 µm. The initial diameter was measured at 3 mm Hg unless the vessel collapsed. In these cases, lumen diameter was estimated by fitting the intraluminal pressure-lumen diameter data (measured between 10 and 140 mm Hg) to a third-order polynomial equation.
Determination of the Composition of Small Artery Walls
Composition of the media of small artery walls was studied as we
have previously described.12 Briefly, after morphometric
determinations, pressurized arteries from 5 of the normotensive and 9
of the hypertensive subjects were perfused for 30 minutes with
calcium-free PSS at an intravascular pressure of 60 mm Hg, fixed
with 1.5% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature
for 60 minutes, and removed from the cannula. After three washes with
calcium-free PSS, vessels were stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C.
Arteries were then fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes at
room temperature, dehydrated in graded ethanol, and embedded in
araldite CY212 epoxy resin (Ladd Research Industries Inc). Excess resin
was trimmed so that the block face contained only the specimen.
Sections were cut on a microtome (Reichert Ultrathin) at a thickness
ranging from 70 to 90 nm and stained with 0.25% phosphotungstic acid
for 15 minutes, 4% uranyl acetate for 10 minutes, and lead citrate for
3 minutes. The sections were examined with a JEM-1200EX electron
microscope (JEOL Ltd). Electron micrographs were taken at an original
magnification of x4000 and enlarged by a factor of 3 for a final
magnification x12 000. Vessels were divided into four quadrants, and
three electron micrographs were taken randomly for a total of 12 to 15
electron micrographs per vessel. Negatives of micrographs were scanned
(Scan Jet 4C/T, Hewlett-Packard). The areas occupied by smooth muscle,
collagen fibers, and elastin were measured by repeated tracing with a
light pen and then use of an imaging program (Adobe Photoshop 3.0).
Means of repeated tracings recorded in pixels were averaged and
used to calculate the cross-sectional area occupied by each
component.
Data Analysis
Calculation of arterial morphology and mechanics was
done as previously described.9 Results are
represented as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were
performed by two-tailed Student's t test. Statistical
evaluation of relationships between mechanical parameters
of vessels from normotensive and hypertensive subjects was performed by
repeated-measures analysis of variance. Where statistical
significance was detected, interaction means were compared using a
two-tailed Student's t test. Differences were considered
statistically significant at a value of P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The structure of subcutaneous small arteries of the subjects studied is
depicted in Table 2
. Media width and
media-to-lumen ratio of the vessels of hypertensive subjects were
increased (P<0.01), whereas media cross-sectional area and
lumen diameter did not exhibit significant differences between the
groups. The growth index, that is, the percent difference in
cross-sectional area of the media between vessels from hypertensive and
normotensive subjects, was 32.8%.
|
Vascular mechanics were studied by progressively increasing
intraluminal pressure. The left panel of Figure 1
shows that wall distensibility plotted
against intraluminal pressure was similar in arteries from both groups.
The right panel of Figure 1
depicts the media stress-strain
relationship, which was significantly shallower in the vessels from
hypertensive subjects, indicating that isometric stress was lower in
hypertensive vessels. From the stress-strain relationship, incremental
elastic modulus was calculated and plotted against intraluminal
pressure and circumferential stress (Figure 2
). The left panel of Figure 2
shows that incremental elastic modulus plotted against intraluminal
pressure was lower in vessels from hypertensive subjects. The right
panel demonstrates that when plotted against circumferential stress,
the slope of the incremental elastic modulus (ß), which demonstrates
the stiffness of wall components, was significantly lower in vessels
from hypertensive subjects than in those from normotensive subjects.
Since in the present study there was a marked imbalance in the
number of male and female hypertensive subjects, the mechanics of
vessels from male and female normotensive and hypertensive subjects
were evaluated separately. Figure 3
shows
that vessel mechanics in male and female hypertensive subjects were
identical. No significant differences were found between vessels from
male and female normotensive subjects. Differences between mechanics of
all normotensive and hypertensive subjects were thus maintained within
men and women.
|
|
|
Electron microscopic evaluation of the structure and composition
of the media of pressurized small arteries from 5 of the 7 normotensive
subjects and 9 of the 14 hypertensive subjects showed a trend toward a
greater number of smooth muscle layers (P=0.07) and
higher collagen volume density (P=0.08) in vessels
from hypertensive subjects and a significant increase in the
collagen-elastin ratio (P<0.05) (Table 2
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lumen diameter of a vessel will depend on opposing forces of
transmural pressure and compliance of the vessel wall. Compliance, that
is, the ability of a vessel to buffer changes in pressure, depends on
the geometry and stiffness of the wall components of the vessel.
Decreases in lumen size (resulting mainly from remodeling in
hypertension10 ) may reduce compliance, which is
geometry-dependent. However, vascular compliance may be normalized by
decreases in elastic modulus. Incremental elastic modulus is
geometry-independent and depends on the stiffness of the vessel wall
components. Elastic modulus is determined by the combined elastic
modulus of the structural components of the vascular wall: connective
tissue, elastin and collagen fibers, smooth muscle cells, and
endothelial cells. Previous studies of the mechanics of
large arteries have demonstrated that vascular wall compliance is not
necessarily reduced in hypertension both in animal models and in human
essential hypertension.6 The mechanism for the absence of
reduced vascular compliance and distensibility despite increased media
thickness and collagen deposition has been obscure. In very small
arteries from the brain, the pioneering studies of Baumbach et
al19 showed for the first time that wall mechanics in
hypertension might not be altered as expected. These investigators
first reported that compliance and distensibility could actually be
increased and that the slope of the incremental elastic modulus in
relation to circumferential stress, that is, the stiffness of wall
components, could be reduced in pial arterioles of approximately
80 µm in lumen diameter from stroke-prone spontaneously
hypertensive rats (SHRSP).8 They found similar results in
small arteries (<150 µm in lumen diameter) but not larger small
arteries (150 to 300 µm in lumen diameter) in the brain. Their
studies demonstrated that the composition of vessels with reduced
stiffness was altered, with increased elastin content,11
which could explain the direction of the alteration in mechanics. We
have found in some groups of SHR,9 and in Dahl-salt
sensitive rats20 and deoxycorticosterone acetate
(DOCA)salt hypertensive rats,21 similar or lower
stiffness of wall components of mesenteric small arteries than in
equivalent vessels from normotensive rats. Together with
previous6 and more recent22 23 findings in
large arteries from animal models and humans, this may suggest that a
reduced stiffness of wall components is indeed a common characteristic
in hypertension. The mechanism may not be the same for all vascular
beds, however, because in contrast to pial arterioles, in which elastin
is increased, in large arteries in SHR most studies have shown an
increase in collagen deposition24 (although the volume
density of collagen was not increased25 ). In mesenteric
small arteries of SHR we have recently demonstrated increases in
collagen as well.12 In the present study we found that
even though the stiffness of wall components is decreased in vessels
from hypertensive subjects, the volume density of collagen in the media
tends to be increased, although not achieving statistical significance,
and the collagen-elastin ratio is significantly enhanced. This agrees
with our previous findings in mesenteric arteries of similar dimension
in SHR.12 It would be expected that an increased
collagen-elastin ratio might increase stiffness.19 Thus it
is likely that in these vessels other factors are involved, and it is
possible that changes in extracellular matrixsmooth muscle cell
attachments may play a role in the change in mechanical properties
found in both human arteries and those of experimental models of
hypertension. Recent studies have demonstrated that in aorta of SHR,
fibronectin and
5-integrin are increased.25 It has been
speculated that increases in cellextracellular matrix attachment
sites may contribute to the maintenance of equivalent
mechanical properties even though SHR vessels, or human vessels in the
present study, are subjected in vivo to higher pressures. The
mechanisms involved in the reduction of the elastic modulus in relation
to wall stress and pressure in resistance arteries from hypertensive
individuals remain unclear. Since differences in the volume density of
more- versus less-distensible components of the media (smooth muscle
and elastin versus collagen) do not appear to play an important role,
the difference in mechanical properties could be related in part to the
characteristics and/or organization of these components in the vascular
wall, particularly the arrangement, alignment, and adhesion of
fibrillar and cellular elements. Models of arrangement of these
components in the vascular wall in general assume that collagen is
arranged in series to smooth muscle cells and in parallel to
elastin.26 The linking of collagen to smooth muscle cells
and the degree to which the collagen jacket is tensed may thus play an
important role, since collagen is less distensible than
elastin.27 Its contribution is supposed to occur in the
latter portion of the pressure curve, since collagen fibers may be
coiled and not under tension until the smooth muscle cells in series
and the elastin in parallel have been stretched. In the remodeled small
artery, with more closely aligned cellular and fibrillar components due
to changes in adhesion of cellular and fibrillar structures, the
collagen fibers may be recruited at higher distending pressures in
vessels from hypertensive subjects than in vessels from normotensive
subjects. Thus, although in small arteries from hypertensive subjects
vascular compliance may be reduced in part because of their smaller
lumen and greater collagen-elastin ratio, this may be compensated by
the engagement of collagen fibers, and resulting tensing of the
collagen jacket may occur in a later portion of the pressure curve.
This has already been proposed by Bank et al28 to explain
changes in compliance and stiffness in the human brachial artery during
contraction and relaxation. If for each level of media stress, elastic
modulus (stiffness) is lower, this will contribute to buffering
the effects of greater intravascular pressure in hypertension.
Elastic properties of subcutaneous small arteries from hypertensive and normotensive individuals have been the subject of one previous study.15 That study was carried out with the wire myograph technique and showed that elastic modulus was not increased in hypertensive vessels. The present results extend the previous observations, showing comparable results with the newer and more physiological approach of examining small arteries in a pressurized system and distending them progressively by increasing intraluminal pressure rather than by stretching the vessels with two wires inserted in the lumen. We have previously demonstrated that structural data obtained with the pressurized system are also comparable to data from observations using wire myography.29 With respect to the study of mechanical properties, both techniques may have limitations. Stretching a vessel with two wires may result in vessel shortening, which may affect the transversally measured elastic properties of the shortened vessel; and pressurization of vessels may result in elongation, which necessitates adjustment of the microcannulas to maintain parallel walls. This could also affect the mechanical characteristics measured. In the present study, however, very little or no adjustment was necessary in the distance between the microcannulas. Thus, it is unlikely that this played a role as a confounder in the results obtained. The loss of tethering by surrounding tissues results in different conditions when the vessels are studied in vitro relative to the in vivo situation. However, the present study does not pretend to examine the in vivo behavior of these vessels, but rather the in vitro characteristics of the vessel wall under similar conditions in arteries from normotensive and hypertensive subjects to help understand the changes that have occurred in the vessel wall. Furthermore, because the original length in vivo of the vessels studied cannot be known, axial stiffness cannot be evaluated whereas circumferential stiffness may be quantified. The arterial wall is anisotropic, that is, direction-dependent.30 Axial and circumferential compliance have been evaluated in carotid arteries in situ in SHR and shown to be similar.31 However, these studies may be performed only when the in vivo length of vessels can be evaluated, such as with the use of ultrasound techniques, which are not yet applicable to the study of human subcutaneous small arteries.17 Because mechanical properties may be altered biaxially,31 32 uniaxial stiffness as investigated in the current study has to be interpreted cautiously.
A limitation of this study is that the proportion of men and
women differed in the normotensive and hypertensive groups. This
resulted from the difficulties inherent in the recruitment of subjects
for an invasive study such as this one, in which a biopsy of
subcutaneous tissue was performed. This could potentially have
contributed to the suggestion of hypertrophic growth in resistance
arteries from this group of hypertensive subjects, who were
predominantly male. However, the stiffness of small arteries from
normotensive men and women was not significantly different, and the
same was found for hypertensive men and women (Figure 3
). Also,
within men, the stiffness of vessels was greater in normotensive than
in hypertensive individuals, and in women, the direction of the
findings was similar, although not achieving statistical significance
in the latter because of the small numbers. Thus, although this
imbalance in the number of subjects from each sex is a recognized
limitation, it may not have influenced the results.
The clinical relevance of these findings may result from the fact that altered mechanics of the vascular wall may affect the velocity of the pulse wave, wave reflection, pulsatility of vessels, blood flow velocity, and accordingly shear stress. Vascular wall damage, and with it cardiovascular risk, may be modified by changes in wall mechanics. Decreases in the stiffness of wall components may protect the vessel wall. The extent to which these changes in mechanics are protective and whether their absence may be an indicator of increased vascular risk remain to be determined.
In conclusion, the components of the wall of subcutaneous small arteries of hypertensive subjects are less stiff than in comparable vessels from normotensive subjects. The mechanism for the increased compliance of small arteries of hypertensive individuals remains unclear. The changes found in the composition of the media of the wall of small arteries, an increased collagen-elastin ratio, cannot explain the differences in mechanical properties between vessels from normotensive and hypertensive subjects. It is possible that changes in extracellular matrix architecture or in cellextracellular matrix attachments may play a role, but this remains to be established. Whether similar changes occur in other vascular beds at the same level of the vasculature requires further study.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 16, 1998; first decision October 16, 1998; accepted October 30, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Schiffrin EL. Reactivity of small blood vessels in hypertension: relation with structural changes. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl II):II-1II-9.
3. Gribbin B, Pickering TG, Sleight P. Arterial distensibility in normal and hypertensive man. Clin Sci. 1979;56:413417.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Folkow B. Physiological aspects of
primary hypertension. Physiol Rev. 1982;62:347504.
5. Simon AC, Laurent S, Levenson JA, Bouthier JA, Safar ME. Estimation of forearm arterial compliance in normal and hypertensive men from simultaneous pressure and flow measurements in the brachial artery, using a pulsed Doppler device and a first-order arterial model during diastole. Cardiovasc Res. 1983;17:331338.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Perret F, Niederberger M, Tardy
Y, Mooser V, Nussberger J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Conduit artery
compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in
hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:16.
7. Laurent S, Caviezel B, Beck L, Girerd X, Billaud E, Boutouyrie P, Hoeks A, Safar M. Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 1994;23(suppl 2):878883.
8.
Hajdu MA, Baumbach GL. Mechanics of large and small
cerebral arteries in chronic hypertension. Am J
Physiol. 1994;266:H1027H1033.
9. Laurant P, Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Effect of pressurization on mechanical properties of mesenteric small arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Vasc Res. 1997;34:117125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Mulvany MJ, Baumbach GL, Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Korsgaard N, Schiffrin EL, Heistad DD. Vascular remodeling. Hypertension. 1996;28:505506.
11.
Baumbach GL, Hajdu MA. Mechanics and composition of
cerebral arterioles in renal and spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1993;21:816826.
12. Sharifi AM, Li JS, Endemann D, Schiffrin EL. Comparison of effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the calcium channel antagonist amlodipine on small artery structure and composition, and on endothelial dysfunction in SHR. J Hypertens. 1998;16:457466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Petersen KK, Swales JD,
Mulvany MJ. Evidence for increased media thickness, increased neuronal
amine uptake, and depressed excitation-contraction coupling in isolated
resistance vessels from essential hypertensives. Circ Res. 1987;61:181186.
14. Schiffrin EL, Deng LY, Larochelle P. Morphology of resistance arteries and comparison of effects of vasoconstrictors in mild essential hypertensive patients. Clin Invest Med. 1993;16:177186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Thybo NK, Mulvany MJ, Jastrup B, Nielsen H, Aalkjaer C. Some pharmacological and elastic characteristics of isolated subcutaneous small arteries from patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996;14:993998.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lew MJ, Angus JA. Wall thickness to lumen diameter ratios of arteries from SHR and WKY: comparison of pressurised and wire-mounted preparations. J Vasc Res. 1992;29:435442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Schiffrin EL, Hayoz D. How to assess vascular remodelling in small and medium-sized muscular arteries in humans. J Hypertens. 1997;15:571584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Heagerty AM, Aalkjær C, Bund SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvany
MJ. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual processes of
remodeling and growth. Hypertension. 1993;21:391397.
19.
Baumbach GL, Dobrin PB, Hart MN, Heistad DD. Mechanics
of cerebral arterioles in hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1988;62:5664.
20. Intengan H, Schiffrin EL. Mechanical properties of mesenteric resistance arteries from Dahl salt-resistant and salt-sensitive rats: role of endothelin-1. J Hypertens. In press.
21.
Intengan HD, He G, Schiffrin EL. Effect of vasopressin
antagonism on structure and mechanics of small arteries and vascular
expression of endothelin-1 in deoxycorticosterone acetatesalt
hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1998;32:770777.
22.
Armentano R, Megnien JL, Simon A, Bellenfant F, Barra
J, Levenson J. Effect of hypertension on visco-elasticity of carotid
and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension. 1995;26:4854.
23.
Laurent S, Girerd X, Mourad J, Lacolley P, Beck L,
Boutouyrie P, Mignot J, Safar M. Elastic modulus of the radial artery
wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension.
Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:12231231.
24.
Albaladejo P, Bouaziz H, Duriez M, Gohlke P, Levy BI,
Safar ME, Benetos A. Angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibition prevents the increase in aortic collagen in rats.
Hypertension. 1994;23:7482.
25.
Bézie Y, Lamazière J-MD, Laurent S,
Challande P, Cunha RS, Bonnet J, Lacolley P. Fibronectin expression and
aortic wall elastic modulus in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:10271034.
26. Roach MR, Burton AC. The reason for the shape of the distensibility curves of arteries. Can J Physiol Biochem. 1957;35:681690.
27. Cox RH. Regional variation of series elasticity in canine arterial smooth muscles. Am J Physiol. 1978;234:H542H551.
28.
Bank AJ, Wilson RF, Kubo SH, Holte JE, Dresing TJ, Wang
H. Direct effects of smooth muscle relaxation and contraction on in
vivo human brachial artery elastic properties. Circ Res. 1995;77:10081016.
29. Schiffrin EL, Deng LY. Structure and function of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients treated with a ß-blocker or a calcium channel antagonist. J Hypertens. 1996;14:12471255.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
L'Italien GJ, Chandrasekar NR, Lamuraglia GM, Pevec
WC, Dhara S, Warnock DF, Abbott WM. Biaxial elastic properties of rat
arteries in vivo: influence of vascular wall cells on anisotropy.
Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H574H579.
31.
Lichtenstein O, Safar ME, Poitevin P, Levy BI. Biaxial
mechanical properties of carotid arteries from normotensive and
hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1995;26:1519.
32.
Gaballa A, Jacob CT, Raya TE, Liu J, Simon B, Goldman
S. Large artery remodeling during aging: biaxial passive and active
stiffness. Hypertension. 1998;32:437443.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Martinez-Lemus, M. A. Hill, and G. A. Meininger The Plastic Nature of the Vascular Wall: Reply to Lee, Sandow, and DeMay Physiology, October 1, 2009; 24(5): 273 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Greenstein, A. Price, K. Sonoyama, A. Paisley, K. Khavandi, S. Withers, L. Shaw, O. Paniagua, R. A. Malik, and A. M. Heagerty Eutrophic Remodeling of Small Arteries in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Is Enabled by Metabolic Control: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study Hypertension, July 1, 2009; 54(1): 134 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dhingra, M. J. Pencina, P. Schrader, T. J. Wang, D. Levy, K. Pencina, D. A. Siwik, W. S. Colucci, E. J. Benjamin, and R. S. Vasan Relations of Matrix Remodeling Biomarkers to Blood Pressure Progression and Incidence of Hypertension in the Community Circulation, March 3, 2009; 119(8): 1101 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Feihl, L. Liaudet, B. I. Levy, and B. Waeber Hypertension and microvascular remodelling Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 274 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Rossi, M. Bolognesi, D. Rizzoni, T. M. Seccia, A. Piva, E. Porteri, G. A.M. Tiberio, S. M. Giulini, E. Agabiti-Rosei, and A. C. Pessina Vascular Remodeling and Duration of Hypertension Predict Outcome of Adrenalectomy in Primary Aldosteronism Patients Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1366 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wu, Y. Yang, P. Gui, Y. Sohma, G. A. Meininger, G. E. Davis, A. P. Braun, and M. J. Davis Potentiation of large conductance, Ca2+-activated K+ (BK) channels by {alpha}5{beta}1 integrin activation in arteriolar smooth muscle J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1699 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Savoia, R. M. Touyz, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin Selective Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker Eplerenone Reduces Resistance Artery Stiffness in Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 432 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Douglas, M. Natalia Cruz, L. Poston, J.-A. Gustafsson, and K. Kublickiene Functional characterization and sex differences in small mesenteric arteries of the estrogen receptor- knockout mouse Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R112 - R120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sonoyama, A. Greenstein, A. Price, K. Khavandi, and T. Heagerty Review: Vascular remodeling: implications for small artery function and target organ damage Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2007; 1(2): 129 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gonzalez, A. M. Briones, B. Somoza, C. J. Daly, E. Vila, B. Starcher, J. C. McGrath, M. C. Gonzalez, and S. M. Arribas Postnatal alterations in elastic fiber organization precede resistance artery narrowing in SHR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H804 - H812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rizzoni, S. Paiardi, L. Rodella, E. Porteri, C. De Ciuceis, R. Rezzani, G. E. M. Boari, F. Zani, M. Miclini, G. A. M. Tiberio, et al. Changes in Extracellular Matrix in Subcutaneous Small Resistance Arteries of Patients with Primary Aldosteronism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2638 - 2642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Briones, F. E. Xavier, S. M. Arribas, M. C. Gonzalez, L. V. Rossoni, M. J. Alonso, and M. Salaices Alterations in structure and mechanics of resistance arteries from ouabain-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H193 - H201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brassard, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin Combined Angiotensin II Type 1 and Type 2 Receptor Blockade on Vascular Remodeling and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Resistance Arteries Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 598 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lehoux and A. Tedgui Making Up and Breaking Up: The Tortuous Ways of the Vascular Wall Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2005; 25(5): 892 - 894. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Schiffrin and R. M. Touyz From bedside to bench to bedside: role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in remodeling of resistance arteries in hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H435 - H446. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Myers, K. J. Harmon, V. Lindner, and L. Liaw Alterations of Arterial Physiology in Osteopontin-Null Mice Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1021 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Pries, B. Reglin, and T. W. Secomb Structural Adaptation of Vascular Networks: Role of the Pressure Response Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1476 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan and E. L. Schiffrin Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension: Roles of Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Fibrosis Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 581 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan and E. L. Schiffrin Structure and Mechanical Properties of Resistance Arteries in Hypertension : Role of Adhesion Molecules and Extracellular Matrix Determinants Hypertension, September 1, 2000; 36(3): 312 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Jeong Bae Park, H. D Intengan, and E. L Schiffrin Reduction of resistance artery stiffness by treatment with the AT1-receptor antagonist losartan in essential hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2000; 1(1): 40 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan, G. Thibault, J.-S. Li, and E. L. Schiffrin Resistance Artery Mechanics, Structure, and Extracellular Components in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats : Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Converting Enzyme Inhibition Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2267 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |