(Hypertension. 1999;33:96-101.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Medicine (Z.Q.W., N.T.H., H.M.S., R.M.C.) and Anesthesiology (L.J.M., R.A.J.), University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.
Correspondence to Robert M. Carey, MD, Box 395, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908. E-mail RMC4C{at}virginia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: receptors, angiotensin II immunohistochemistry kidney hypertension, renal
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both 2-kidney, 1-clip (2K1C) (Goldblatt) and 2-kidney, 1-figure-of-8-wrap (2K1W) (Grollman) renal hypertension are renin dependent.9 10 Differential regulation of renal AT1 subtype receptor mRNA in renal hypertension has been reported in 2K1C rats.11 However, regulation of the AT2 receptor expression in renal hypertension is unknown. The present study is designed to investigate the distribution and regulation of renal subtype AT1A and AT2 receptor protein in Ang IIdependent hypertension in rats induced by systemic Ang II infusion and rats in the acute phase of renal hypertension (either 7-day 2K1C or 3-day 2K1W hypertension).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characteristics of Polyclonal Antisera
The peptide
(225AYEIQKNKPRNDD237), a
part of the third cytoplasmic domain of the rat
AT1A receptor,12 was
cross-linked to thyroglobulin and used to generate a specific
antiAT1A receptor polyclonal antiserum in the
rabbit.13 14 This antiserum recognized a specific
protein with an estimated molecular mass of 60 kd, consistent
with the predicted molecular weight of the glycosylated form of the
AT1A receptor.13 The
specificity of the antiserum was further supported
by1 a single band of 60 kd detected from the
AT1A receptorrich adult (12-week old) rat liver
but not from the AT1B receptorrich adult
(12-week old) rat pituitary gland (Pel-Freez; Rogers, Ariz) by
immunoblot analysis, performed as described in the
following section (Figure 1
, left)2 ; a significant decrease in the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay response (10 ng of the peptide used
as antigen target) after preadsorption challenge of the antiserum with
the peptide at 120 µg/mL diluted antiserum, performed as
described15 (Figure 1
, right). The polyclonal
antiserum to the AT2 receptor was raised in the
rabbit against a synthetic peptide sequence
(1MKDNFSFAATSRNITSS17 )
derived from the rat AT2 receptor, and its
specificity has been documented.4 16 17
|
Animal Preparations
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (200 to 220 g body weight,
Hilltop Laboratory Animals; Scottsdale, Pa) were randomly allocated to
the following groups1 : 2K1C hypertension and a
sham-operated control group2 ; 2K1W hypertension
and a sham-operated control group; and Ang IIinduced hypertension and
a vehicle-infused control group.3 After rats were
anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg body wt
intraperitoneally), the left kidneys were exposed
by a midline laparotomy in the first 2 groups. In the first group, the
left renal artery was clipped by placement of a solid U-shaped silver
clip. The effective clipping of the left renal artery was confirmed by
a 70% to 75% reduction in renal cortical blood flow as determined by
a laser Doppler probe (superficial probe, type C, Advance Co, Ltd)
coupled to a laser Doppler flowmeter (ALF 21D Dual Channel
Flowmeter, Advance Co, Ltd). In the second group, the left kidney was
tautly wrapped in a figure-of-8 pattern around the kidney to compress
the poles and body with 2.0 silk thread (Ethicon Inc). All rats in the
sham control groups received identical surgical treatment apart from
clip placement or renal wrap. In the third group, Ang II (25 ng/min in
lactated Ringer's solution) or vehicle was infused into the jugular
vein through mini-osmotic pumps (model 2002, Alza). After 3 days (for
2K1W and sham-operated control rats), 7 days (for 2K1C and
sham-operated control rats), or 10 days (for Ang IIinfused or
vehicle-infused rats), systolic arterial blood
pressure was measured by a tail-cuff photosensor (Rat Tail
Monometer-Tachometer system, Natsume model KN-210, Peninsula
Laboratories). The kidneys were quickly perfused and then harvested for
immunohistochemical studies (n=3/group) and Western blot
analysis (n=7/group) from rats deeply anesthetized with
pentobarbital sodium (80 mg/kg body wt
intraperitoneally).
Light Microscopic Immunohistochemistry
Indirect immunoperoxidase immunohistochemistry was performed as
previously described.4 16 Frozen sections (10 to
12 µm) were incubated with one of the following, diluted 1:500
in 1.5% normal goat serum and 0.5% nonfat dry milk in
phosphate-buffered saline1 :
AT1A (7.7 protein mg/mL) or
AT2 (3.1 mg protein/mL) receptor primary
antiserum2 ; AT1A or
AT2 receptor primary antiserum preabsorbed
against its respective synthetic peptide antigen. For preadsorption,
antiserum was incubated overnight at 4°C with its respective peptide
immunogen at 120 µg/mL (for AT1A) or 50 µg/mL
(for AT2) diluted antiserum. Immunoreactive
signal was detected with an avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase reaction
(Vectastain ABC kit, Vector Laboratory) and visualized by exposure to
diaminobenzidine for 40 seconds.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously
described.4 16 The nitrocellulose membrane was
incubated with the AT1A or
AT2 receptor antibody (both 1:1000 dilution in
Tris-buffered saline with 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20) in
random order. Blots were then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated
donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000 dilution, Amersham,
Arlington Heights, Ill). The immunoreactivity was visualized with an
enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit (Amersham).
Membranes were stripped between incubations with different antibodies
in a Tris-buffered solution containing 2% sodium dodecyl
sulfate and 100 mmol/L ß-mercaptoethanol at 50°C.
Quantitative assessment of band densities was performed by scanning densitometry (ImageQuant, Molecular Dynamics). Statistical analysis was performed with a Macintosh StatView program (Abacus Concepts). All data were expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons were made with either the unpaired t test or 1-way ANOVA followed by Fisher protected least significant difference test for multiple comparisons when appropriate. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intrarenal Distribution of AT1A and AT2
Subtype Receptors
In the frozen sections of normal rat kidney, intense
immunoreactivity for the AT1A receptor was
observed in glomeruli, proximal and distal tubules, and collecting
ducts (Figure 2
, A and B). The macula
densa cells were strongly stained (Figure 2
, A). Positive
immunostaining also was observed in the intrarenal
vasculature (Figure 2
, A), including juxtaglomerular cells
(Figure 2
, C) and interlobular artery (Figure 2
, D). No specific
staining was observed in consecutive sections incubated with
preabsorbed antiserum (Figure 2
, E). Notably, less staining than normal
control rats was observed in the kidney of the Ang IIinfused rat
(Figure 2
, F) and both ischemic and contralateral kidneys of
the 2K1C (Figure 2
, G and H) and 2K1W (Figure 2
, I and J) rats,
respectively.
|
The immunoreactive signal for the AT2 receptor
was present mainly in the glomeruli and also lightly in the
proximal tubules of the normal rat kidney (Figure 3
, A). No specific staining was observed
in consecutive sections incubated with preabsorbed antiserum (Figure 3
, B). The AT2 receptor staining was absent in the
clipped kidney of the 2K1C rat (Figure 3
, C) and apparently decreased
in both the glomeruli and tubules in the wrapped kidney of the 2K1W rat
(Figure 3
, D). However, both the glomeruli and tubular epithelium were
positively stained in the contralateral (nonischemic) kidneys
of the 2K1C (Figure 3
, E) and 2K1W rats (Figure 3
, F). No apparent
change from the normal rat in the renal AT2
receptor staining was observed in the Ang IIinfused rat (Figure 3
, G).
|
Western Blot Analysis of Renal AT1A and
AT2 Subtype Receptors
In both 2K1C and 2K1W renal hypertensive rats, the
AT1A receptor protein was significantly reduced
in the ischemic and contralateral kidneys compared with
sham-operated control rats (n=7/group, P<0.01 in 2K1C and
2K1W, Figure 4
). However, the reduction
in the AT2 receptor protein expression was
observed only in the ischemic kidneys in both 2K1C (n=7/group,
P<0.01) and 2K1W (n=7/group, P<0.05) rats
(Figure 5
). Renal
AT1A receptor protein expression was
significantly decreased in rats with Ang IIinduced hypertension
compared with vehicle-infused controls (n=7/group, P<0.05,
Figure 4
). No significant difference in renal AT2
receptor protein was observed between Ang IIinfused and
vehicle-infused rats (n=7/group, P>0.05, Figure 5
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Renal hypertension produced by unilateral renal artery clipping or renal compression is associated with increased renin release and Ang II production from the ischemic kidney26 (also unpublished data). The current findings provide direct evidence for the bilateral downregulation of the renal AT1A subtype receptor protein in rats with acute-phase 2K1C and 2K1W renal hypertension. Renal AT1A receptor mRNA expression is decreased after systemic administration of a nonpressor dose of Ang II27 and in the clipped kidney 2 days after unilateral renal artery clipping.11 These results are in agreement with the notion that increased Ang II exerts a negative regulatory effect on the renal expression of the AT1A receptor.
This study demonstrated differential regulation of the renal AT2 receptor in renal hypertension. The AT2 receptor was downregulated only in the ischemic kidneys of 2K1C and 2K1W hypertensive rats, whereas renal AT2 receptor expression was not significantly affected in Ang IIinduced hypertensive rats. These results suggest that increased Ang II itself may not be directly responsible for this downregulation. Hypoperfusion and/or other local changes secondary to reduced blood supply to the clipped/wrapped kidney are possible causes of suppressed AT2 receptor expression in the ischemic kidneys of renal hypertensive rats. A lack of inducible AT2 receptor expression in cultured rat glomerular mesangial cells from stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and aortic vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats has been described.5 28 The AT2 receptor not only causes vasodilation in the preglomerular afferent arteriole7 but also exerts an antiproliferative effect29 and induces apoptosis.30 Recently, accelerated renal interstitial fibrosis and collagen deposition has been observed in adult AT2 receptor null mutant mice during unilateral ureteral obstruction.31 Thus, decreased AT2 receptor expression in the ischemic kidney may aggravate renal ischemia and promote cell proliferation/fibrosis, possibly augmenting kidney damage in renal hypertension.
In summary, we localized the AT1A subtype receptor protein to glomeruli, proximal and distal tubules (including macula densa), and collecting ducts, as well as the intrarenal vasculature. Renal AT1A but not AT2 receptor protein was downregulated in Ang IIinduced hypertension. Expression of AT1A and AT2 receptor protein in the kidney was differentially regulated in renal vascular hypertensive rats: The AT1A receptor was bilaterally downregulated, whereas the AT2 receptor was downregulated only in the ischemic kidney. Differential regulation of angiotensin receptor subtypes may play a role in the pathophysiology of renal hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 30, 1998; first decision March 4, 1998; accepted August 28, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Palm, S. G. Connors, M. Mendonca, W. J. Welch, and C. S. Wilcox Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors and Nitric Oxide Sustain Oxygenation in the Clipped Kidney of Early Goldblatt Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobori, M. Nangaku, L. G. Navar, and A. Nishiyama The Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System: From Physiology to the Pathobiology of Hypertension and Kidney Disease Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 251 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, C. J. Monjure, and B. J. Bivona Efferent arterioles exclusively express the subtype 1A angiotensin receptor: functional insights from genetic mouse models Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1177 - F1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vazquez, I. Coronel, R. Bautista, E. Romo, C. M. Villalon, M. C. Avila-Casado, V. Soto, and B. Escalante Angiotensin II-dependent induction of AT2 receptor expression after renal ablation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): F207 - F213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobori, M. C. Prieto-Carrasquero, Y. Ozawa, and L. G. Navar AT1 Receptor Mediated Augmentation of Intrarenal Angiotensinogen in Angiotensin II-Dependent Hypertension Hypertension, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 1126 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tan, F. N. Hutchison, and A. A. Jaffa Mechanisms of angiotensin II-induced expression of B2 kinin receptors Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H926 - H932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rizkalla, J. M. Forbes, M. E. Cooper, and Z. Cao Increased Renal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietins by Angiotensin II Infusion Is Mediated by Both AT1 and AT2 Receptors J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3061 - 3071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jones, S. S. Dhamrait, J. R. Payne, E. Hawe, P. Li, I. S. Toor, L. Luong, P. T.E. Wootton, G. J. Miller, S. E. Humphries, et al. Genetic Variants of Angiotensin II Receptors and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 500 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, A. K. Cook, M. I. Oliverio, and T. M. Coffman Renal segmental microvascular responses to ANG II in AT1A receptor null mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): F538 - F545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Cao, F. Bonnet, R. Candido, S. P. Nesteroff, W. C. Burns, H. Kawachi, F. Shimizu, R. M. Carey, M. de Gasparo, and M. E. Cooper Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor Antagonism Confers Renal Protection in a Rat Model of Progressive Renal Injury J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2002; 13(7): 1773 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Navar, L. M. Harrison-Bernard, A. Nishiyama, and H. Kobori Regulation of Intrarenal Angiotensin II in Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 316 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Berry, R. Touyz, A. F. Dominiczak, R. C. Webb, and D. G. Johns Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2337 - H2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. A. WIEREMA, A. J. H. M. HOUBEN, A. A. KROON, D. KOSTER, K. V. D. ZANDER, J. M. A. V. ENGELSHOVEN, and P. W. D. LEEUW Nitric Oxide Dependence of Renal Blood Flow in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2001; 12(9): 1836 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Moore, N. T. Heiderstadt, E. Huang, N. L. Howell, Z.-Q. Wang, H. M. Siragy, and R. M. Carey Selective Inhibition of the Renal Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor Increases Blood Pressure in Conscious Rats Hypertension, May 1, 2001; 37(5): 1285 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Moritz, I. Koukoulas, A. Albiston, and E. M. Wintour Angiotensin II infusion to the midgestation ovine fetus: effects on the fetal kidney Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): R1290 - R1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gallinat, S. Busche, M. K. Raizada, and C. Sumners The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2000; 278(3): E357 - E374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ozono, T. Matsumoto, T. Shingu, T. Oshima, Y. Teranishi, M. Kambe, H. Matsuura, G. Kajiyama, Z.-Q. Wang, A. F. Moore, et al. Expression and localization of angiotensin subtype receptor proteins in the hypertensive rat heart Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2000; 278(3): R781 - R789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Carey, Z.-Q. Wang, and H. M. Siragy Role of the Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor in the Regulation of Blood Pressure and Renal Function Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Siragy and R. M. Carey Protective Role of the Angiotensin AT2 Receptor in a Renal Wrap Hypertension Model Hypertension, May 1, 1999; 33(5): 1237 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, J. Zhuo, H. Kobori, M. Ohishi, and L. G. Navar Intrarenal AT1 receptor and ACE binding in ANG II-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): F19 - F25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||