(Hypertension. 1999;33:626-632.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Pharmacology (E.J.L.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.
Correspondence to Masaaki Tamura, DVM, PhD, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232. E-mail tamuram{at}ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: sodium channels ATP-sensitive K+-channel AT2 receptor angiotensin II PC12 cells calcium channels
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among several peripheral tissues in adult rats that have been reported to express AT2-Rs, adrenal medulla expresses them most abundantly.6 7 However, no physiological significance has yet been attributed to this AT2-R. In adrenal medulla, Ang II stimulates catecholamine production through AT1-R,23 24 a mechanism for which extracellular Ca2+ entry into the cytoplasm is necessary.25 26 AT2-Rs, however, do not transmit the Ang II signal for intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in adrenal medullary cells.27 If AT2-R expression is regulated in association with intracellular Na+ or K+ levels, AT2-R is anticipated to play a role in signaling that is eventually associated with Na+ or K+ metabolism. Clarification of AT2-R expression, in conjunction with intracellular cation mobilization, may therefore provide us with a clue to the physiological significance of AT2-R in adrenal medulla. We conducted the present study to obtain fundamental knowledge of the potential physiological function of AT2-R using rat pheochromocytoma-derived PC12W cells, which have been reported to express AT2-R exclusively and abundantly.27 28 In the present article, we report on intracellular cation (particularly Na+)dependent regulation of AT2-R expression in PC12W cells.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture
The rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC12 was derived from clonal
isolation of an adrenal chromaffin cell tumor.29 A
substrain, PC12W, was the generous gift of Drs. K.H. Kim and R.C. Speth
(Washington State University, Pullman). PC12W cells were grown in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere of
95% air/5% CO2. For determination of receptor
density, cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of
2.5x104/well and cultured for 2 to 3 days. The
medium was changed to serum-free DMEM 24 hours before the binding
assay, which was performed when the culture was approximately 80% to
90% confluent. When the effect of extracellular
Na+ concentration on AT2-R
expression levels was studied, PC12W cells were cultured in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS for 2 to 3 days. They were then cultured
further in a modified DMEM consisting of 145 mmol/L NaCl, 1.8
mmol/L KCl, 1.2 mmol/L
KH2PO4, 5 mmol/L
NaHCO3, 0.5 mmol/L
MgSO4, 1.8 mmol/L
CaCl2, 25 mmol/L glucose, 4% MEM amino acid
solution (50x), 4% MEM vitamin solution (100x), 1% MEM nonessential
amino acid solution (100x), 0.5% FBS, and 0.5 mg/mL bovine serum
albumin (BSA) (pH 7.4) at 37°C in a CO2
incubator. The modified DMEM with low Na+
(35 mmol/L NaCl) was prepared by substituting 110 mmol/L NaCl
with choline chloride.
Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were obtained from thoracic aorta tissue of male spontaneously hypertensive rats as described previously.30 VSMCs were cultured for 5 to 6 days in the same medium and under the same conditions as described for PC12W cells. COS-7 cells stably expressing AT2-R were prepared by the electroporation transfection method with pRC/CMV (Invitrogen) containing a 2.9-kb insert derived from AT2 cDNA as described previously.31 The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS under the same conditions as described for PC12W cells for 2 to 3 days before the experiment.
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II
Binding Assay
The radioligand receptor binding assay was performed
using intact cultured cells and
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II.
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II was prepared from
[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II and
125I-Na by the lactoperoxidase method.
Subconfluent PC12W cells in 24-well plates were washed twice with
Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) and incubated with 0.5 nmol/L
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II with or without 1 µmol/L unlabeled
[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II for 3
hours at 4°C in the presence of 1 µmol/L losartan and
0.5 mg/mL BSA. Unbound ligand was thoroughly washed out with HBSS at
4°C. Cells were solubilized with 0.5 mol/L NaOH, and the remaining
radioactivity was counted. Specific binding was estimated by
subtracting the nonspecific binding obtained in the presence of 1
µmol/L unlabeled ligand from the total binding. An aliquot of the
solubilized cells was subjected to protein assay (BCA protein assay
method, Pierce Chemical Co). Specific binding was normalized by protein
quantity per well. Saturation isotherm data were analyzed
according to the Scatchard method.32
Northern Blot Analysis
The total RNA in PC12W cells was isolated by the acid
guanidinium-phenol-chloroform extraction method.33 Twenty
micrograms of the total RNA was then electrophoresed on a 1.0%
agarose/1.0% formaldehyde gel and transferred to a Hybond
N+2 membrane (Amersham). A
full-length cDNA of the mouse AT2 gene was labeled with
32P by a Prime It kit (Stratagene) and used as a
probe after heat denaturation. The filter was then exposed to Kodak
X-OMAT film at -70°C. The hybridized filter was stripped and
hybridized to a 32P-labeled GAPDH probe to obtain
a reference for the amount of applied RNA. Autoradiographic
analysis was performed by an image scanner (ES-800C scanner,
Epson America, Inc) and a computer program (Image 1.59, National
Institutes of Health).
Statistical Analysis
Data obtained from the binding assay were averaged and are
presented as mean±SE. Significant differences between groups
were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance with the
Student-Newman-Keuls test. A value of P<0.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Since PC12W cells express AT2-R exclusively,27 28 the receptor subtype specificity of the ouabain effect was investigated using VSMCs, which predominantly express AT1-Rs (no detectable AT2-Rs were expressed), and COS-7 cells, which contained permanently transfected AT2-R coding regions. In VSMCs, AT1-R expression was slightly decreased by low concentrations of ouabain (10 and 25 nmol/L, Figure 2A). In COS-7 cells, AT2-R expression was significantly increased at low concentrations of ouabain (25 and 50 nmol/L, Figure 2B). These results, together with the results shown in Figure 1, clearly demonstrate that the ouabain effect on Ang II receptors is specific to AT2-R. The involvement of intracellular Na+ level in AT2-R expression was further examined using insulin and a mixture of insulin and ouabain. Insulin alone dose-dependently (10 to 100 nmol/L) increased AT2-R expression (Figure 3). When insulin and ouabain were added together, they showed additive effects on the increase in AT2-R expression in PC12W cells (Figure 3). To clarify whether the ouabain-dependent increase in receptor density is due to an increment in the receptor density or induction of another type of receptor protein, we analyzed 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding characteristics using intact whole cells. Data in Figure 4 indicate that AT2-R in PC12W cells possesses two types of binding sites (Kd=1.7 nmol/L, high-affinity site; Kd=17.4 to 19.1 nmol/L, low-affinity site). Ouabain treatment increased the binding maximum of both high- and low-affinity sites by approximately 55%. These data suggest that the intracellular Na+dependent increase in AT2-R levels is due to an increment in receptor density.
|
|
|
The above experiments suggest that intracellular
Na+ level is an important factor in the
regulation of AT2-R expression. To clarify this
hypothesis, we manipulated intracellular Na+
level with the sodium ionophore monensin. A very low concentration of
monensin (10 nmol/L) significantly increased
AT2-R expression by approximately 75%. Although
a higher concentration of monensin (
100 nmol/L) is known to be
cytotoxic, the cytotoxicity of monensin at 10 nmol/L for 48 hours of
treatment was not significant. This result confirms that intracellular
Na+ level is tightly associated with the
regulation of AT2-R expression. Since an increase
in intracellular Na+ level was shown to
upregulate AT2-R expression, we studied the
reverse effect by lowering extracellular Na+
concentration. In this experiment, osmolarity in the
low-sodium-modified medium was maintained at the same level as in the
high-sodium-modified medium by substituting the removed NaCl with
choline chloride. When PC12W cells were cultured in modified DMEM
containing 0.5% FBS for 48 hours, the increase in
AT2-R expression caused by ouabain or insulin in
the 145 mmol/L Na+ medium was abolished by
lowering the Na+ concentration in the medium to
35 mmol/L (Figure 5). These results
again suggest that increased intracellular Na+
upregulates AT2-R expression.
|
In addition to investigating AT2-R expression in
PC12W cells by manipulating intracellular Na+
level, we investigated such expression by using a
K+-channel agonist and a variety of
antagonists. The ATP-sensitive
K+-channel blockers tolbutamide and glybenclamide
dose-dependently increased AT2-R expression,
whereas the ATP-sensitive K+-channel agonist
cromakalim significantly downregulated receptor density (Figure 6A). Although the nonspecific
K+-channel blockers
tetraethylammonium and
4-aminopyridine increased receptor level significantly,
both blockers required much higher concentrations (higher than
millimoles per liter) than the specific channel blockers to increase
the receptor level in PC12W cells (data not shown). However, another
type of nonspecific K+-channel blocker, quinidine
(10 µmol/L), significantly increased AT2-R
expression over a narrow concentration range (Figure 6B). The
Ca2+-sensitive K+-channel
blocker charybdotoxin (
1 µmol/L) did not show any effect on
AT2-R expression levels (data not shown). These
results demonstrate that the changing K+ currents
are also an important factor affecting AT2-R
expression levels in PC12W cells.
|
K+-channel blockade and Na+ pump inhibition promote decreased membrane polarization in neuronal-type cells such as PC12W cells. This in turn activates the L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, which could in turn account for AT2-R upregulation. Nifedipine (10 µmol/L), a specific blocker of the L-type Ca2+ channel, slightly but significantly lowered basal AT2-R expression level and almost abolished the effect of 50 nmol/L ouabain, 10 µmol/L quinidine, or 0.5 mmol/L tolbutamide (Figure 7).
|
Receptor protein expression is a summation of transcriptional and translational regulation and protein degradation. To evaluate the involvement of transcriptional regulation in AT2-R expression, we estimated AT2-R mRNA levels using Northern blot analysis. Treatment with ouabain (50 nmol/L), monensin (10 nmol/L), quinidine (10 µmol/L), or insulin (100 nmol/L) for 48 hours significantly increased AT2-R mRNA levels in PC12W cells (Figure 8), whereas the ATP-sensitive K+-channel blocker tolbutamide and the K+-channel agonist cromakalim (100 µmol/L) at levels effective for receptor upregulation did not change mRNA levels in PC12W cells. Nifedipine (10 µmol/L) slightly decreased mRNA level. These results suggest that an increase in intracellular Na+ may stimulate transcriptional regulation of AT2-R expression, whereas a K+-channel blockerdependent increase in AT2-R expression may be due to posttranslational regulation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study intracellular Na+ level was manipulated by inhibition of the Na+ pump with ouabain, by activation of sodium entry with insulin, or by treatment with the sodium ionophore monensin; then AT2-R level was evaluated. In these three types of experiments, AT2-R expression was upregulated (see Figures 1 and 3 and Results). Thus, AT2-R expression appears to be upregulated when intracellular Na+ level is increased. This result was supported by another experiment, in which the intracellular Na+-dependent AT2-R upregulation caused by ouabain was abolished by lowering extracellular Na+ level (Figure 5). In agreement with the present study, insulin has been reported to increase AT2-R expression in R3T3 cells.36
Changes in intracellular Na+ influence membrane potential. Since increases in intracellular Na+ sensitively upregulated AT2-R expression, changes in K+ currents were also anticipated to regulate AT2-R expression. Indeed, our study demonstrated that manipulation of K+ currents by a variety of K+-channel blockers increased AT2-R expression. Among many K+-channel blockers tested, the ATP-sensitive K+-channel blockers tolbutamide and glybenclamide and the classic nonspecific K+-channel blocker quinidine most effectively upregulated AT2-R expression. The ATP-sensitive K+-channel agonist cromakalim dose-dependently downregulated AT2-R expression. These results indicate that as with Na+, changes in K+ currents in the cell membrane regulate AT2-R expression (Figure 6).
K+ channels and the Na+ pump alter membrane polarization and Ca2+ entry through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Neuronal cells possess voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels,37 so it is of interest to evaluate the effect of intracellular Ca2+ on AT2-R expression. In the experiment with the voltage-dependent Ca2+-channel blocker nifedipine, lowering Ca2+ entry from extracellular sources decreased basal AT2-R expression as well as the intracellular Na+- or K+-currentdependent upregulation of AT2-R (Figure 7). Nifedipine (10 µmol/L) treatment for 48 hours also decreased AT2-R mRNA level by approximately 25%. These results suggest that there could be intracellular Ca2+dependent regulation of AT2-R downstream of the intracellular Na+ and K+ currentdependent regulation mechanism. However, since all of the chemicals used for the present study are known to modulate membrane potential, modification of the membrane potential may contribute to the regulation of AT2-R expression.
The binding characteristics of radiolabeled Ang II or its analogues to
AT2-R have been studied in many types of
cells.27 31 38 39 40 Many of these studies have reported
that AT2-R contains a single, saturable binding
site.27 31 38 39 The present study, however, revealed
that AT2-R in PC12W cells contains distinct high-
and low-affinity binding sites (Figure 4). In agreement, Siemens
et al40 have reported that neuroblastoma cells (N1E-115)
possess two distinct AT2-Rs. Despite the use of
different cells and different procedures (Siemens et al used
solubilized membrane fractions, whereas the present study used
intact cells), the Kd values from their
experiment and from the present study are almost identical (
1.7
nmol/L). The discrepancy between the present study and other
studies, which have reported a single binding site on
AT2-R, can be explained by the following. In the
present study, saturation curves were drawn using a wide range of
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II concentrations (0 to 15 nmol/L), whereas most other reports have
used only a very narrow concentration range of the radiolabeled ligands
(<5 nmol/L). The present study showed a low-affinity binding site
that emerged at approximately 4 nmol/L
125I-[Sar1,Ile8]Ang
II (Figure 4A), so most of the other reports would not have been
able to detect this low-affinity binding site. The results of
the present study clearly indicate that the binding capacities at
both binding sites were increased to almost an identical extent by
ouabain treatment. This may suggest that the two binding sites belong
to a single molecule.
AT1-R and AT2-R have been shown to be derived from different genes located on different chromosomes.41 Their mRNA and protein expressions are apparently regulated by different mechanisms. In the present study, AT1-R expression in VSMCs was not upregulated by ouabain (Figure 2), suggesting that the intracellular cation level or an alteration of the membrane potential is not a signal for the regulation of AT1-R expression. Although nonspecific K+-channel blockers such as tetraethylammonium have been reported to inhibit agonist-induced receptor desensitization in seven transmembranetype receptors,42 it has been shown that AT2-R is not internalized by Ang II.27 38 43 In the present study, K+-channel blockerdependent increases in AT2-R expression were not accompanied by an increment in mRNA level. These results may suggest that AT2-R upregulation by K+-channel blockers is in part due to a decrease in the receptor turnover rate.
Protein expression is the sum result of transcription and translation. In the present study we measured mRNA levels by Northern blot analysis. We also determined the relative and functional quantities of the expressed protein by measuring ligand-receptor binding. The results from both determinations suggest that an increase in intracellular Na+ sensitively upregulates AT2-R expression. The mechanism underlying this upregulation is possibly transcriptional regulation, whereas a K+-channel blockerdependent increase in AT2-R level is postulated to be at least in part translational/posttranslational regulation. The results provide a potential approach to determination of the physiological significance of AT2-Rmediated signals. It is of interest to determine whether similar mechanisms occur in vivo. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that AT2-R is regulated by intracellular cations, particularly the sodium ion.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 30, 1998; first decision August 28, 1998; accepted October 1, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bottari S, deGasparo M, Steckelings U, Levens N. Angiotensin II receptor subtypes: characterization, signaling mechanisms, and possible physiological implication. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1993;14:123171.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Timmermans P, Wong P, Chiu A, Herblin W, Benfield P, Carini D, Lee R, Wexler R, Saye J, Smith R. Angiotensin II receptor and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev. 1993;45:205251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Csikós T, Gallinat S, Unger T. Extrarenal
aspects of angiotensin II function. Eur J
Endocrinol. 1997;136:349358.
5. Birabeau M, Capponi A, Vallotton M. Solubilized adrenal angiotensin II receptor: studies on the site of action of sodium and calcium ions and on the role of disulfide bridges. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1984;37:181189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Chiu A, Herblin W, McCall D, Ardecky R, Carini D, Duncia J, Pease L, Wong P, Wexler R, Johnson A, Timmermans P. Identification of angiotensin II receptor subtypes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;165:196203.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Whitebread S, Mele M, Kamber B, deGasparo M. Preliminary biochemical characterization of two angiotensin II receptor subtypes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;163:284291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Stoll M, Steckelings M, Paul M, Bottari S, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:651657.
9.
Nakajima M, Hutchinson H, Fujinaga M, Hayashida W,
Morishita R, Zhang L, Horiuchi M, Pratt R, Dzau V. The
angiotensin II (AT2) receptor
antagonizes the growth effects of the AT1
receptor: gain-of-function study using gene transfer. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1066310667.
10. Lo M, Liu K, Lantieme P, Sassard J. Subtype 2 of angiotensin II receptor controls pressure-natriuresis in rats. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:13941397.
11.
Jaiswal N, Tallant EA, Diz DI, Khosla MC, Ferrario CM.
Subtype 2 angiotensin receptors mediate
prostaglandin synthesis in human astrocytes.
Hypertension. 1991;17:11151120.
12.
Lokuta AJ, Cooper C, Gaa ST, Wang HE, Rogers TB.
Angiotensin II stimulates the release of
phospholipid-derived second messengers through multiple receptor
subtypes in heart cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:48324838.
13. Siragy H, Carey R. The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:19781982.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Yamada T, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ. Angiotensin
II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 1996;93:156160.
15.
Scheuer D, Perrone M. Angiotensin type 2
receptors mediate depressor phase of biphasic pressure response to
angiotensin. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:R917R923.
16. Hein L, Barsh GS, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, Kobilka BK. Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of disrupting the angiotensin II type-2 receptor gene in mice. Nature. 1995;377:744747.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ichiki T, Labosky P, Shiota C, Okuyama S, Imagawa Y, Fogo A, Niimura F, Ichikawa I, Hogan B, Inagami T. Effect on blood pressure and exploratory behavior of mice lacking angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Nature. 1995;377:748750.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Munzenmaier DH, Greene AS. Opposing actions of
angiotensin II on microvascular growth and
arterial blood pressure. Hypertension. 1996;27:760765.
19. Kang J, Richards E, Posner P, Sumners C. Modulation of the delayed rectifier K+ current in neurons by an angiotensin II type 2 receptor fragment. Am J Physiol. 1994;268:C278C282.
20.
Buisson B, Laflamme L, Bottari S, deGasparo M,
Gallo-Payet N. A G protein is involved in the angiotensin
AT2 receptor inhibition of the T-type calcium
current in non-differentiated NG10815 cells. J Biol
Chem. 1995;270:16701674.
21.
Laflamme L, deGasparo M, Gallo JM, Payet MD,
Gallo-Payet, N. Angiotensin II induction of neurite
outgrowth by AT2 receptors in NG10815 cells.
J Biol Chem. 1996;271:2272922735.
22. Meffert S, Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Bottari SP, Unger T. The angiotensin II AT2 receptor inhibits proliferation and promotes differentiation in PC12W cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1996;122:5967.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Bunn SJ, Marley PD. Effects of angiotensin II on cultured bovine adrenal medullary cells. Neuropeptides. 1989;13:121132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Wong PC, Hart PD, Zaspel AM, Chiu AT, Ardecky RJ, Smith
RD, Timmermans, PBMWM. Functional studies on non-peptide
angiotensin II receptor subtype-specific ligands: DuP 753
(AII-1) and PD123177 (AII-2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;255:584592.
25.
Kim KT, Westhead EW. Cellular responses to
Ca2+ from extracellular and intracellular sources
are different as shown by simultaneous measurement of
cytosolic Ca2+ and secretion from bovine
chromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:98819885.
26. Livett BG, Marly PD. Noncholinergic control of adrenal catecholamine secretion. J Anat. 1993;183:227289.
27. Webb M, Liu EK, Cohen R, Hedberg A, Bogosian E, Monshizadegan H, Molloy C, Serafino R, Moreland S, Murphy T, Dickinson K. Molecular characterization of angiotensin II type II receptors in rat pheochromocytoma cells. Peptide. 1992;13:499508.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Leung KH, Roscoe WA, Smith RD, Timmermans PBMWM, Chiu AT. Characterization of biochemical responses of angiotensin II (AT2) binding sites in the rat pheochromocytoma PC12W cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;227:6370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Speth RC, Kim KH. Discrimination of two angiotensin II receptor subtypes with a selective agonist analogue of angiotensin II, p-aminophenyalanine6 angiotensin II. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;169:9971006.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Inui H, Kitami Y, Kondo T, Inagami T. Transduction of
mitogenic activity of platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF) AB by PDGF-ß receptor without participation of PDGF-
receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1704517050.
31.
Kambayashi Y, Bardhan S, Takahashi K, Tsuzuki S, Inui
H, Hamakubo T, Inagami T. Molecular cloning of a novel
angiotensin II receptor isoform involved in phosphotyrosine
phosphatase inhibition. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:2454324546.
32. Scatchard G. The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1949;51:660672.
33. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-PhOH-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Kim KH. A role of retinoic acid in the regulation of the morphology and the levels of intermediate filament proteins and mRNAs in PC12 cells. Exp Cell Res. 1992;203:374382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Greene LA, Tischler AS. Establishment of a
noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal
pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73:24242428.
36.
Ichiki T, Kambayashi Y, Inagami T. Multiple growth
factors modulate mRNA expression of angiotensin II type-2
receptor in R3T3 cells. Circ Res. 1995;77:10701076.
37. Artalejo CR, Bader MF, Aunis D, Garcia AG. Inactivation of the early calcium uptake and noradrenaline release evoked by potassium in cultured chromaffin cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986;134:17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Dudley D, Hubbell S, Summerfelt R. Characterization of angiotensin II-AT2 binding sites in R3T3 cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1991;40:360367.[Abstract]
39. Speth RC. [125I]CGP 42112 binding reveals differences between rat brain and adrenal AT2 receptor binding sites. Regul Pept. 1993;44:198197.
40. Siemens IR, Reagan LP, Yee DK, Fluharty SJ. Biochemical characterization of two distinct angiotensin AT2 receptor populations in murine neuroblastoma N1E-115 cells. J Neurochem. 1994;62:21062115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Inagami T, Guo DF, Kitami Y. Molecular biology of angiotensin II receptors: an overview. J Hypertens Suppl. 1994;12:S83S94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Kooyman AR, Zwart R, Vijverberg HP. Tetraethylammonium ions block 5-HT3 receptor-mediated ion current at the agonist recognition site and prevent desensitization in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;246:247254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Hein L, Meinel L, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, Kobilka BK.
Intracellular trafficking of angiotensin II and its
AT1 and AT2 receptors:
evidence for selective sorting of receptor and ligand. Mol
Endocrinol. 1997;11:12661277.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kanehira, T. Tani, T. Takagi, Y. Nakano, E. F. Howard, and M. Tamura Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Gene Deficiency Attenuates Susceptibility to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamine-Induced Lung Tumorigenesis: Involvement of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Dependent Cell Growth Attenuation Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7660 - 7665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baudouin-Legros, F. Brouillard, D. Tondelier, A. Hinzpeter, and A. Edelman Effect of ouabain on CFTR gene expression in human Calu-3 cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): C620 - C626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Elbaz, K. Bedecs, M. Masson, M. Sutren, A. D. Strosberg, and C. Nahmias Functional Trans-inactivation of Insulin Receptor Kinase by Growth-Inhibitory Angiotensin II AT2 Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2000; 14(6): 795 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. De Mello and A. H. J. Danser Angiotensin II and the Heart : On the Intracrine Renin-Angiotensin System Hypertension, June 1, 2000; 35(6): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gallinat, S. Busche, M. K. Raizada, and C. Sumners The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2000; 278(3): E357 - E374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Activation of the Na+-H+ Exchanger Modulates Angiotensin II–Stimulated Na+-Dependent Mg2+ Transport in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Genetic Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 442 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |