(Hypertension. 1999;33:647-652.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Yonsei University Graduate School of Health Science and Management, Seoul, Korea (S.H.J.); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research (S.H.J., J.H., M.J.K.) and Department of Medicine (M.J.K.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Departments of Epidemiology (S.H.J., J.H., M.J.K.) and Health Policy and Management (M.J.K.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md; School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, La (P.K.W.); and Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (I.S.).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: blood pressure coffee meta-analysis clinical trials
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental studies provide the best opportunity to determine whether a relationship is causal and whether an intervention, such as coffee cessation, has therapeutic relevance. In 1934, Horst et al12 reported on a clinical trial of coffee drinking in hypertensive patients. Since then, >36 experimental investigations of the effects of coffee consumption on blood pressure in humans have been published. However, most of these trials have been small and cannot provide definitive results. The effects of coffee drinking on heart rate and the question of whether the health effects of coffee drinking differ according to the method used for brewing have also been controversial.13 14
Pooling the results of clinical trials provides a means to obtain more precise estimates of intervention effect as well as an opportunity to explore the basis for any heterogeneity in trial outcomes. With this in mind, we present the results of a meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials in which the effect of long-term coffee drinking on blood pressure was assessed.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
24 hours' duration. Eleven trials met the criteria for inclusion in our analysis. The major reasons for exclusion were as follows: (1) active treatments were applied to the coffee group but not to the control group16 23 40 ; (2) decaffeinated coffee was compared with caffeine tablets41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ; (3) insufficient data were provided to calculate the net change in blood pressure and its variance from baseline to the end of follow-up12 16 ; and (4) duration of <24 hours.19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 29 35
Data Abstraction
Information on sample size, age, gender, hypertensive status,
antihypertensive medications, study design, type of control, method of
blood pressure, baseline blood pressure, change in blood pressure,
coffee intake, run-in period, method of preparation, and amount of
coffee was abstracted from every article. If different treatments were
used in the same report, they were analyzed as separate trials
and delineated by a and b suffixes, as indicated in Table 1. When
studies had both ambulatory and resting blood pressure, ambulatory
blood pressure measurement was used in the
analysis.32 33 34 37 38 39 Ambulatory
measurements were used for 2 reasons. First, information needed to
calculate the net effect of coffee intake on blood pressure was not
available for resting blood pressure measurements in 2
studies.38 39 More importantly, ambulatory measurements
provide a more precise measurement of blood pressure than do resting
measurements because multiple determinations of blood pressure are
obtained. This improved precision permits greater statistical power to
detect blood pressure changes in clinical trials.51 Two
studies32 39 did not provide baseline ambulatory blood
pressure, and therefore resting blood pressure was recorded as
pretreatment blood pressure. In the study by Superko et
al,39 several ambulatory blood pressure readings were
provided for different time periods. Measurements from 3 PM
to 6 PM were arbitrarily chosen for calculating effect
size.
|
Statistical Analysis
In trials with multiple treatment
groups,14 25 27 31 the effect of coffee intake was
assessed by comparing the treatment groups with the no-coffee control
group. For parallel trials, net changes in blood pressure were
calculated as the mean difference (coffee minus control) of the changes
(follow-up minus baseline) in these mean values. For crossover trials,
net changes were calculated as the mean difference in values between
the end of the coffee supplementation and control periods. In a few
instances, these values had to be estimated from
figures.24 25 26 To calculate the pooled effects of
treatment, each study was assigned a weight consisting of the
reciprocal of its total variance. Because the variances for net changes
in blood pressure were not reported directly in most articles, they
were calculated from CIs, t statistics, probability value,
or the individual variances for intervention and control groups
(parallel trials) or intervention and control periods (crossover
trials). For parallel trials in which the variance of paired
differences during the trial was reported separately for each group, we
calculated a pooled variance for net change using standardized
methods.52
Estimates of the mean effect of coffee consumption on blood pressure and the corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models.53 The assumption of heterogeneity implied by the use of the random-effects model is plausible because duration of the trials varied and they were conducted in samples that differed by age, hypertension status, and other covariates. To explore further the possible influence of covariates on net change in blood pressure, a series of subgroup analyses was performed on the basis of biological knowledge and our review of the literature. Finally, univariate and multivariate linear regression models were weighted by the inverse of variance for change in blood pressure. For each trial, covariates were calculated as average values at baseline or during the study or as the average change from baseline. Variables that demonstrated statistical significance in the univariate analyses as well as age were included in the multivariate models. When information on mean age was missing (4 trials), we used an average of the minimum and maximum values for that trial. Information on race was not reported with the exception of 1 trial. For crossover trials, we used the mean blood pressure during the control period as a baseline value. For the 1 trial in which baseline blood pressure information was not available for the entire group,22 we used an average of the values for the remaining 10 trials. To examine potential publication bias, we plotted sample size against effect size.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Compared with control, coffee administration was associated with an average net change in blood pressure that ranged from -2.1 to 6.1 mm Hg for systolic and -0.9 to 3.1 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (Figure 1). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased in the coffee administration arm compared with the corresponding control group in 9 (82%) of the 11 trials; in 6 trials (55%), the lower bound of the 95% CI was >0. For diastolic blood pressure, an intervention-related increase in blood pressure was also noted in 9 (82%) of the 11 trials, and the lower bound of the 95% CI was >0 in 6 (55%) of the 11 studies. For both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, there was considerable variation across the 11 trials in the estimate of intervention-related average net change in blood pressure and in the width of the associated 95% CI. On the basis of a test of homogeneity, the variation in estimated in effect size was significant for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P<0.001).
|
Pooled estimates of the effect of coffee supplementation on systolic and diastolic blood pressure are provided in Table 3. The overall pooled estimates of treatment effect associated with coffee drinking were 2.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.7) for systolic (P=0.005) and 1.2 mm Hg for diastolic (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.1) (P=0.015) blood pressure. There was evidence favoring a greater effect on systolic blood pressure in studies with a run-in period of <7 days and those that administered more coffee. Diastolic blood pressure also increased more in trials with younger participants. There was no statistically significant difference in effect size between other subgroups. The pooled effect of drinking 1 cup of coffee, estimated in linear regression analysis, was 0.8 mm Hg for systolic pressure (P<0.001) (Figure 1) and 0.5 mm Hg for diastolic pressure (P<0.01).
|
Because the study population in the trial of treated hypertensive persons may have differed from that in the other trials, the analysis was performed with the exclusion of this trial.38 The overall estimate of the change in blood pressure in the remaining 10 trials was virtually identical to the overall results for both systolic pressure (2.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.8 mm Hg) and diastolic pressure (1.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.1 mm Hg). To make certain that use of ambulatory measurements did not bias the results, the meta-analysis was also repeated using resting blood measurements for those studies for which they were available. Results were unchanged.
In multiple linear regression analysis, 3 variables were independently associated with systolic blood pressure. The variables (effect sizes) were age (-2.22 mm Hg/y; P<0.005), coffee consumption (0.52 mm Hg/cup; P<0.04), and sample size (0.06 mm Hg/person; P<0.002). The same 3 variables were included in the multivariate model for diastolic blood pressure. The effect sizes were -0.11 mm Hg/y (P=0.01) for age, 0.25 mm Hg/cup (P=0.12) for coffee intake, and 0.03 mm Hg/person for sample size (P<0.01). Approximately 82% of the variance in systolic and 72% of the variance in diastolic blood pressurerelated treatment effect size could be explained by the 3 variables included in the multivariate model.
The plot of sample size versus effect size showed a typical "funnel" shape with little variation in effect size for large sample studies and increasing spread of effect size with smaller sample sizes. The distribution of effect sizes seen in individual studies was symmetrically distributed around the pooled mean effect size.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous reviews have suggested that coffee consumption is associated with an increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.16 17 18 53 Results from observational studies, however, have been inconsistent and difficult to interpret. A few cross-sectional studies have shown a positive association between habitual coffee consumption and blood pressure.1 2 3 4 5 In the Busselton study, coffee consumption was directly related to blood pressure change over 6 years of follow-up.11 In contrast to these reports, several observational studies have failed to identify a pressor effect of habitual coffee consumption.6 7 8 9 10
In the present analysis, trials using a control group that consumed no coffee yielded the same results as the small number employing a control group that consumed decaffeinated coffee. This suggests that the effects of coffee on blood pressure are related to the presence of caffeine rather than another ingredient.24 Smits et al26 also reported that the cardiovascular effects of drinking coffee appears to be primarily related to caffeine content. The effect of caffeine on blood pressure appears to be mediated through an increase in systemic vascular resistance brought about by its ability to block adenosine receptors.56
The average effect size noted in the 11 trials included in our meta-analysis was relatively small. Small effects on blood pressure, however, can translate into important reductions in the incidence of hypertension and community burden of cardiovascular disease.57 Observational studies have consistently identified the presence of an important continuous, graded, independent relationship between systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels and risk of stroke, coronary heart disease, and end-stage renal disease.58 59
It is very likely that the association of coffee administration with an increase in blood pressure is causal. The 95% CIs around the estimate of effect size make it unlikely that the associations noted reflect a chance finding. The dose-response relationship observed between coffee intake and systolic blood pressure also supports a causal association, as does replication of the relationship in studies conducted in different populations and with different study designs. Finally, the association is biologically plausible. This meta-analysis, however, is limited by the trials available for inclusion. There were few trials, and most of them were of relatively small size, were conducted in persons with normotensive levels of blood pressure, and were of relatively short duration. Dietary interventions that influence blood pressure usually have a more profound effect in hypertensive persons.60 On the other hand, longer-term studies may have shown even less of an effect because of continued adaptation to the pressor effects of coffee ingestion. Adaptation occurs quickly,55 however, and there was no relation between study duration and effect of coffee intake in this group of trials. Lastly, this meta-analysis included only published studies. Exclusion of unpublished research may have biased the results because negative studies are less likely to be published. On examination of the funnel plots, however, there was no evidence of publication bias.
In summary, our findings provide support for a relationship between coffee intake and higher blood pressure. A high priority for the future should be the conduct of trials of longer duration and in groups who are at higher than average risk of hypertension or who already have high blood pressure. In addition, there is a need for further exploration of the role of factors such as cigarette smoking and stress in modifying the effect of coffee consumption on blood pressure.15 42
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 21, 1998; first decision September 10, 1998; accepted October 15, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R Mort and H. R Kruse Timing of Blood Pressure Measurement Related to Caffeine Consumption Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2008; 42(1): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hu, P. Jousilahti, A. Nissinen, S. Bidel, R. Antikainen, and J. Tuomilehto Coffee consumption and the incidence of antihypertensive drug treatment in Finnish men and women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C Cornelis, A. El-Sohemy, and H. Campos Genetic polymorphism of the adenosine A2A receptor is associated with habitual caffeine consumption Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 240 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moser and J. F. Setaro Clinical practice. Resistant or difficult-to-control hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med., July 27, 2006; 355(4): 385 - 392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Winkelmayer, M. J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, and G. C. Curhan Habitual Caffeine Intake and the Risk of Hypertension in Women JAMA, November 9, 2005; 294(18): 2330 - 2335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vlachopoulos, D. Panagiotakos, N. Ioakeimidis, I. Dima, and C. Stefanadis Chronic coffee consumption has a detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2005; 81(6): 1307 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B Katan and E. Schouten Caffeine and arrhythmia Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2005; 81(3): 539 - 540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vlachopoulos, F. Kosmopoulou, D. Panagiotakos, N. Ioakeimidis, N. Alexopoulos, C. Pitsavos, and C. Stefanadis Smoking and caffeine have a synergistic detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1911 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Savoca, D. A. Ludwig, and G. A. Harshfield Caffeine Consciousness--Reply Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2004; 158(11): 1092 - 1093. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Myers Effect of Caffeine on Blood Pressure Beyond the Laboratory Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 724 - 725. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Lovallo, M. F. Wilson, A. S. Vincent, B. H. Sung, B. S. McKey, and T. L. Whitsett Blood Pressure Response to Caffeine Shows Incomplete Tolerance After Short-Term Regular Consumption Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 760 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. James Critical Review of Dietary Caffeine and Blood Pressure: A Relationship That Should Be Taken More Seriously Psychosom Med, January 1, 2004; 66(1): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, C. Binggeli, I. Sudano, L. Spieker, E. Hanseler, F. Ruschitzka, W. F. Chaplin, T. F. Luscher, and G. Noll Coffee Acutely Increases Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Blood Pressure Independently of Caffeine Content: Role of Habitual Versus Nonhabitual Drinking Circulation, December 3, 2002; 106(23): 2935 - 2940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Klag, N.-Y. Wang, L. A. Meoni, F. L. Brancati, L. A. Cooper, K.-Y. Liang, J. H. Young, and D. E. Ford Coffee Intake and Risk of Hypertension: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study Arch Intern Med, March 25, 2002; 162(6): 657 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mahmud and J. Feely Acute Effect of Caffeine on Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Pressure Waveform Hypertension, August 1, 2001; 38(2): 227 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Lee, M.-H. Ha, J.-R. Kim, and D. R. Jacobs Jr Effects of Smoking Cessation on Changes in Blood Pressure and Incidence of Hypertension : A 4-Year Follow-Up Study Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 194 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Warner Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Hypertension Complementary Health Practice Review, October 1, 2000; 6(1): 11 - 19. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Varani, F. Portaluppi, S. Gessi, S. Merighi, E. Ongini, L. Belardinelli, and P. A. Borea Dose and Time Effects of Caffeine Intake on Human Platelet Adenosine A2A Receptors : Functional and Biochemical Aspects Circulation, July 18, 2000; 102(3): 285 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Hartley, B. H. Sung, G. A. Pincomb, T. L. Whitsett, M. F. Wilson, and W. R. Lovallo Hypertension Risk Status and Effect of Caffeine on Blood Pressure Hypertension, July 1, 2000; 36(1): 137 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other Articles Noted Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 1999; 2(4): 105 - 112. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Alcohol, Coffee, and Blood Pressure Control Journal Watch Cardiology, May 7, 1999; 1999(507): 7 - 7. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||