(Hypertension. 1999;33:746-752.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contribution |
From the Department of Pharmacology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Dr Dennis P. Healy, Department of Pharmacology, Box 1215, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029. E-mail d_healy{at}smtplink.mssm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aminopeptidases angiotensin II angiotensin III kidney glomerulus proximal renal tubules
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early studies failed to detect any change in plasma levels of APA from essential and renal hypertensive patients compared with normotensive patients,10 leading to the view that angiotensinases are unregulated. It has been widely shown, however, that measurement of plasma components of the RAS are not reliable indicators of changes in activity within tissues.3 11 12 Among the various vascular beds, Ang II is most rapidly extracted from the renal circulation.13 APA is highly expressed within the kidney, with the highest levels being found within proximal tubules and glomeruli.14 Various lines of evidence conclude that renal dysfunction plays a prominent role in the development and maintenance of hypertension.15 In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), transplantation of SHR kidneys into normotensive animals produces hypertension in the recipients.16 Likewise, young SHR are hypersensitive to intrarenal injections of Ang II.17 18 Whereas one might predict that a decrease in expression of APA in SHR kidneys may contribute to the development of hypertension in this model, we determined that kidney APA was elevated in prehypertensive, developing, and established phases of hypertension.19 Further, we found that ACE inhibition reduced kidney APA activity, suggesting that APA expression may be positively regulated by Ang II. The possibility is supported by evidence that intrarenal Ang II is elevated in young SHR.20 Thus, upregulation of APA by Ang II may be a homeostatic mechanism by which elevated Ang II speeds its degradation, and this mechanism may act in parallel with the negative feedback inhibition of renin release by Ang II to reduce the levels of Ang II.19 Whereas the upregulation of APA does not prevent development of hypertension in SHR, failure of APA to upregulate or a deficiency in APA expression would be expected to speed development of this form of hypertension. Indeed, intravenous administration of purified APA reduces blood pressure in SHR in a dose-dependent manner,21 showing that modulating APA levels may have important consequences with regard to blood pressure regulation.
Although ACE inhibition reduced APA activity in SHR kidney, blood pressure was also reduced by this treatment, leaving open the possibility that the reduction was secondary to the fall in blood pressure. In the present study, we sought to determine the direct effects of Ang II on APA expression but by minimizing the indirect effects due to elevation of blood pressure. We used 2 approaches. The first was to infuse chronically, via osmotic minipumps, nonpressor doses of Ang II. The second approach used two-kidney, one clip (2K1C) Goldblatt hypertensive rats, a renin-dependent model of hypertension.22 Immediately after unilateral placement of a silver clip to restrict blood flow, plasma renin becomes elevated because of increased synthesis and release of renin by the ischemic kidney. Plasma renin remains elevated for a period of several weeks after which, over the next 2 to 5 weeks, renin levels return to normal as hypertension develops and perfusion to the clipped kidney returns to normal. The nonclipped kidney is thus exposed to high blood pressure and high Ang II levels via the systemic circulation, whereas the clipped kidney is exposed to high Ang II levels and low to normal blood pressure. The advantage of this model is that it allows differentiation between direct effects of Ang II versus effects secondary to elevations in blood pressure.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For studies with 2K1C Goldblatt hypertensive rats, a silver clip (ID 0.2 mm) was placed over the left renal artery of rats under pentobarbital anesthesia (50 mg/kg, IP). Sham-operated controls simply had the left renal artery exposed. Blood pressures were monitored weekly from both the 2K1C and sham-operated groups for 4 successive weeks by tail-cuff plethysmography (IITC Inc). Four weeks after surgery, the rats were decapitated and truncal blood was collected into heparinized tubes. The left (clipped or normal) and right kidneys were processed for histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and measurement of APA activity. Glomeruli were isolated as described previously14 from kidneys pooled from 6 animals.
Enzymatic Assay
APA enzyme activity from kidney membranes was measured as
previously described with use of
-glutamyl-2-naphthylamide
(Bachem Bioscience, Philadelphia, PA) as substrate.14
Specific activities were expressed as µmol substrate ·
hydrolyzed mg · tissue-1 ·
h-1. Kidney samples were homogenized
with a Polytron at 4°C for 20 seconds in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCL buffer,
pH 7.5. A low-speed spin (500g) was used to remove cellular
debris. The supernatant was then centrifuged at
40 000g to collect crude membranes that were used for
enzymatic assay and immunoblotting.
Immunoblots
Immunoblotting was conducted as previously
reported with some modifications.14 Crude kidney membranes
were prepared by boiling for 5 minutes in buffer containing 60
mmol/L Tris-HCL, 2% SDS, 100 mmol/L DTT, and 0.01% Coomassie
brilliant blue and were centrifuged in a Microfuge for 10
minutes. The resulting supernatants of kidney protein were separated by
10% SDS-PAGE (kidney samples 40 µg, isolated glomeruli 20 µg) and
then were transferred to a nylon membrane (Immobilon) in the presence
of a transfer buffer containing 25 mmol/L Triza base, 192
mmol/L glycine, and 15% methanol at 70 V for 1 hour. The membrane was
treated with a blocking buffer containing 5% nonfat dry milk and
0.02% NaN3 with agitation at 37°C for 1 hour.
The blocked membrane was washed twice with PBS for 5 minutes and then
was incubated with primary APA antiserum (1:3000) at 4°C overnight.
The membrane was washed 4 times with PBS for 5 minutes and then was
incubated with peroxidase-labeled goat secondary antibody against
rabbit IgG at 37°C with agitation for 3 hours. The membrane was
washed 4 times with PBS for 5 minutes and was incubated with 10 mL 0.05
mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) containing 6 mg diaminobenzidine and 10 µL
30% H2O2 for 5 minutes.
The membrane was then washed with PBS and was dried. For
quantification, samples were visualized by luminescence (ECL Western
blotting, Amersham International). The labeling intensity of the bands
was performed by an Agfa Arcus flatbed scanner interfaced to a computer
running ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics) densitometry software.
Immunohistochemistry
The immunohistochemical staining of APA with
fluorescein-labeled avidin in rat kidney was performed
according to methods previously described.14 Briefly,
frozen kidneys were sectioned by cryostat and 20-µm sections were
collected onto cold slides coated with silane. Sections were fixed for
5 minutes in 3% paraformaldehyde, were rinsed twice in
PBS for 2 minutes, and were passed sequentially through
H2O, 50% ethyl alcohol (ETOH), 70% ETOH, 95%
ETOH, and 100% ETOH for 1 minute each. The vacuum-dried sections were
then preincubated with 2% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.3%
Triton X-100 RT for 30 minutes followed by incubation with primary APA
antiserum (1:500 dilution) in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and
0.1% BSA at 4°C overnight. Sections were then rinsed 4 times with
PBS for 5 minutes and were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit
IgG (Vector Laboratories) in PBS-Triton X-100 (1:222 dilution) at room
temperature for 45 minutes. The sections were washed 4 times with PBS
for 5 minutes and were incubated with fluorescein-avidin
reagent/PBS-Triton X-100 (1:100 dilution) at room temperature for 1
hour. The slides were rinsed 4 times with PBS for 5 minutes and were
air dried. The immunofluorescent labeling of APA in the kidney
sections of rat was examined with a fluorescence microscope.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Enzyme Activity
APA enzyme activity in kidney membranes prepared from both 1- and
2-week Ang II infusion groups was significantly higher than in control
rats (Table 2). Plasma APA activity was
unchanged. Glomeruli isolated from 1- or 2-week Ang IIinfused rats
had increased APA activity that was more than 2-fold compared with
control rats (Table 2). In contrast, APA enzyme activity was
significantly lower (P<0.01) in cortical membranes from the
clipped kidneys compared with sham-operated control kidneys (Table 2).
The clipped kidney also had lower APA activity compared with the
nonclipped kidney (P<0.05). Plasma APA activity was not
significantly different between the 2K1C group and sham-operated
controls. APA activity was increased 1.7-fold, however, within isolated
glomeruli from the nonclipped kidney compared with glomeruli from
sham-operated controls (Table 2). (Fibrosis of the clipped kidney
interfered with purification of isolated glomeruli and prevented
measurement of glomerular APA activity.)
|
Immunoblots
Immunoblot analysis of kidney membranes
from Ang IIinfused and vehicle-infused control rats revealed labeling
of an APA at
140 kd as previously described.14 There
was a 1.7-fold increase (P<0.01) in the labeling of the APA
band from Ang IIinfused rats compared with vehicle-infused rats
(Figure 1). Glomeruli isolated from the
Ang IIinfused animals also had elevated levels of APA (Figure 2). Densitometric analysis of the
labeled bands indicated that APA was increased approximately 10.2-fold
in isolated glomeruli from the 1-week Ang IIinfused animals and
4-fold in the 2-week infused animals compared with glomeruli from
control animals. Immunoblot analysis of isolated
glomeruli from nonclipped and sham-operated kidneys indicated that the
APA immunoreactivity was higher in nonclipped kidney glomeruli than
from controls (Figure 2). Densitometric analysis of the labeled
bands indicated a 33% increase in labeling from the nonclipped kidney
compared with sham-operated controls.
|
|
APA Histochemistry
Histochemical staining of APA in kidney sections revealed
that APA activity was principally elevated in glomeruli of both the 1-
and 2-week Ang IIinfused groups of animals compared with control
animals (Figure 3). There was no clear
difference in tubular APA activity between groups. APA histochemical
activity within kidney sections from 2K1C sham-operated controls was
primarily localized to tubule elements and glomeruli (Figure 4A and 4B). Nonclipped kidneys had less
tubular staining and an increase in glomerular APA
histochemical activity (Figure 4C and 4D). Whereas the increase in
glomerular APA histochemical activity was uniform, the
reduction in tubular APA activity was somewhat segmental with some
areas being less affected. The most marked differences in APA
histochemical staining were within the clipped kidneys (Figure 4E and 4F). Glomerular APA activity was much greater and tubular
activity greatly diminished throughout the kidney.
Histological examination of kidney sections from all 3
kidney types was unremarkable except that the clipped kidneys had some
degree of tubulointerstitial fibrosis and tubular
atrophy.
|
|
APA Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining of APA in kidney sections taken
from 1- and 2-week Ang IIinfused rats showed that APA was
particularly increased in glomeruli from both groups but in particular
within the 2-week group (Figure 5). In
2K1C animals, APA immunofluorescence was higher in
the glomeruli from both nonclipped and clipped kidneys compared with
that of sham-operated control rats (Figure 6). As noted in the Methods section, the
immunofluorescent procedure that was used was not optimal for
tubular localization, leaving a high autofluorescent background
(Figure 6D). However, specific tubular staining was primarily of the
apical lining, consistent with previous studies.14
The apical staining was diminished in sections from both clipped and
nonclipped kidneys.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An increase in glomerular APA histochemical activity was also seen by Johnson et al23 after infusion of pressor doses of Ang II. Here we showed that low-dose Ang II also upregulates glomerular APA activity, with the increase seeming to be because of increased levels of the enzyme, as seen both in immunoblots and immunohistochemically. Infusion of Ang II at doses that produce moderate hypertension have been shown to result in marked glomerular injury accompanied by increased deposition of matrix proteins.23 24 Indeed, renal injury due to elevated Ang II is known to play an important role in the progressive loss of renal function in diseases in which glomerulosclerosis is secondary.25 ACE inhibitors have been shown to delay the progression of glomerulosclerosis.26 27 APA is expressed both within mesangial cells and podocytes.14 28 29 Whereas upregulation of APA within glomeruli may play a protective role against the adverse effects that Ang II produces within glomeruli by decreasing the local concentration of Ang II, the current findings suggest that the increase in APA does not prevent the occurrence of glomerular injury. However, Wolf et al30 recently showed that overexpression of APA blocked the mitogenic effects of Ang II on mesangial cells in vitro. Thus, upregulation of APA may indeed prevent or retard the development of glomerular sclerosis but may be limited from doing so by the capacity of the endogenous system. Conversely, failure of APA to upregulate in the presence of elevated intrarenal Ang II or a primary defect in APA could be potential risk factors for Ang IImediated renal diseases.
The most surprising result from the present study was the decrease in APA activity in proximal tubules from 2K1C animals. Indeed, it is possible to speculate that the reduction in tubular APA may actually contribute to the maintenance of this form of hypertension. Ang II promotes sodium reabsorption from the proximal tubules.31 32 33 34 A reduction in APA activity within the proximal tubule, therefore, would facilitate the tubular effects of Ang II and enhance sodium and water reabsorption. Whereas total body sodium retention does not seem to be a prominent feature of 2K1C renovascular hypertension, the general view is that the clipped kidney retains sodium whereas the nonclipped kidney excretes sodium. However, in 2K1C hypertension, the nonclipped kidney contributes significantly to development of this form of hypertension by exhibiting an inappropriate natriuretic response to rising blood pressure.35 36 Whereas the increase in blood pressure may be expected to decrease tubular reabsorption, elevated activity of the RAS seems to counteract the increase in blood pressure such that tubular function in the nonclipped kidney is normal. The increased activity of the RAS in the nonclipped kidney is revealed when 2K1C animals are administered ACE inhibitors or Ang II receptor antagonists. These animals exhibit a marked natriuresis despite simultaneous reductions in blood pressure.37 38 Thus, it has been concluded that there is an Ang IImediated enhancement in tubular reabsorption of sodium in nonclipped kidneys from 2K1C animals.37 The basis for the increase in Ang IImediated tubular reabsorption in the nonclipped kidney seems to be elevated intrarenal content of Ang II.24 39 This finding seems paradoxical, inasmuch as renin levels are reduced in the nonclipped kidney.40 Although a number of explanations have been put forward,41 42 it is possible to speculate that the increase in kidney Ang II content may be related to a decrease in kidney APA. Thus, the reduction in tubular APA expression in nonclipped kidneys may contribute to the Ang IImediated enhanced sodium reabsorption seen in the nonclipped kidney and, as such, may indirectly influence the progression of this form of renovascular hypertension.
Whereas there were marked changes in expression of APA within the kidney, there was no change in plasma levels of APA. The lack of change in plasma APA is consistent with early studies with renovascular hypertensive patients in which no difference was seen.10 Indeed, this early report contributed to the generally held belief that angiotensinases are housekeeping enzymes. However, as shown numerous times, the level or activity of components of the RAS in plasma may or may not reflect the activity of the system within tissues.3 11 12 Moreover, the results presented here strongly suggest that APA can indeed be regulated by a physiological substrate, suggesting that regulation of Ang II degradation may play a role in regulation of activity of the RAS.
In summary, these studies indicate that animals exposed to increased levels of Ang II have elevated expression of APA in glomeruli regardless of whether the kidneys are exposed to elevated pressure. Upregulation of APA presumably plays a protective role against the adverse effects of Ang II in the development of glomerulosclerosis. In the clipped kidney from 2K1C animals in which renin secretion is elevated and Ang II is high, downregulation of APA within proximal tubules kidney presumably facilitates the tubular effects of Ang II on sodium reabsorption. In the nonclipped kidney, the same changes in cellular APA expression may have negative consequences. A reduction in APA would increase intrarenal Ang II levels by decreasing degradation of either systemically delivered or intrarenally formed Ang II. Such an increase in intrarenal Ang II would facilitate sodium retention by the nonclipped kidney and could contribute significantly to the development of 2K1C hypertension. The reduction in tubular APA may account, therefore, for the enhanced Ang IImediated tubular sodium reabsorption that occurs in these kidneys and would tend to oppose the pressure-natriuretic effects that the elevated blood pressure has on renal function. These results also contribute to the growing body of evidence that APA can be regulated by Ang II and that degradation/conversion of Ang II to angiotensin III may represent another level at which activity of the RAS can be regulated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 29, 1998; first decision August 5, 1998; accepted October 6, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Williams GH. Converting-enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:15171525.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mullins JJ, Peters J, Ganten D. Fulminant hypertension in transgenic rats harbouring the mouse Ren-2 gene. Nature. 1990;344:541544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kimura S, Mullins JJ, Bunnemann B, Metzger R, Hilgenfeldt U, Zimmermann F, Jacob H, Fuxe K, Ganten D, Kaling M. High blood pressure in transgenic mice carrying the rat angiotensinogen gene. Embo J. 1992;11:821827.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ahmad S, Ward PE. Role of
aminopeptidase activity in the regulation of the
pressor activity of circulating angiotensins. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;252:643650.
6. Palmieri FE, Bausback HH, Ward PE. Metabolism of vasoactive peptides by vascular endothelium and smooth muscle aminopeptidase M. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;38:173180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Nagatsu I, Gillespie L, Folk JE, Glenner GG. Serum aminopeptidases, "angiotensinase," and hypertension. I. Degradation of angiotensin II by human serum. Biochem Pharmacol. 1965;14:721728.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Khairallah PA, Bumpus FM, Page IH, Smeby RR.
Angiotensinase with a high degree of specificity in plasma
and red blood cells. Science. 1963;140:672674.
9. Nagatsu I, Nagatsu T, Yamamoto T, Glenner GG, Mehl JW. Purification of aminopeptidase A in human serum and degradation of angiotensin II by the purified enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;198:255270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Nagatsu I, Gillespie L, George JM, Folk JE, Glenner GG. Serum aminopeptidases, "angiotensinase," and hypertension. II. Amino acid beta-napthylamide hydrolysis by normal and hypertensive serum. Biochem Pharmacol. 1965;14:853861.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Samani NJ. New developments in renin and hypertension. Tissue generation of angiotensin I and II changes the picture. BMJ. 1991;302:981982.
12. Esther CR, Marino EM, Howard TE, Machaud A, Corvol P, Capecchi MR, Bernstein KE. The critical role of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme as revealed by gene targeting in mice. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:23752385.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Hodge RL, Ng KK, Vane JR. Disappearance of angiotensin from the circulation of the dog. Nature. 1967;215:138141.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Song L, Ye M, Troyanovskaya M, Wilk E, Wilk S, Healy
DP. Rat kidney glutamyl aminopeptidase
(aminopeptidase A): molecular identity and cellular
localization. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:F546F557.
15.
Cowley AW Jr, Roman RJ. The role of the kidney in
hypertension. JAMA. 1996;275:15811589.
16. Rettig R, Schmitt B, Pelzl B, Speck T. The kidney and primary hypertension: contributions from renal transplantation studies in animals and humans. J Hypertens. 1993;11:883891.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Chatziantoniou C, Daniels FH, Arendshorst WJ.
Exaggerated renal vascular reactivity to angiotensin and
thromboxane in young genetically hypertensive rats.
Am J Physiol. 1990;259:F372F382.
18.
Vyas SJ, Jackson EK. Angiotensin II:
enhanced renal responsiveness in young genetically hypertensive rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273:768777.
19.
Healy DP, Song L. Kidney aminopeptidase
A and hypertension. I. Spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1999;33:740745.
20. Matsushima Y, Kawamura M, Akabane S, Imanishi M, Kuramochi M, Ito K, Omae T. Increases in renal angiotensin II content and tubular angiotensin II receptors in prehypertensive spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1988;6:791796.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mizutani S, Furuhashi M, Imaizumi H, Ito Y, Kurauchi O, Tomoda Y. Effects of human placental aminopeptidases in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Med Sci Res. 1987;15:12031204.
22.
Martinez-Maldonado M. Pathophysiology of renovascular
hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;17:707719.
23.
Johnson RJ, Alpers CE, Yoshimura A, Lombardi D, Pritzl
P, Floege J, Schwartz SM. Renal injury from angiotensin
II-mediated hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;19:464474.
24.
Von Thun AM, Vari RC, el Dahr SS, Navar LG.
Augmentation of intrarenal angiotensin II levels by chronic
angiotensin II infusion. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F120F128.
25. Harris RC, Martinez-Maldonado M. Angiotensin II-mediated renal injury. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1995;21:328335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Therapeutic advantage of converting enzyme inhibitors in arresting progressive renal disease associated with systemic hypertension in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:19932000.
27. Zatz R, Dunn BR, Meyer TW, Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Prevention of diabetic glomerulopathy by pharmacological amelioration of glomerular capillary hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:19251930.
28.
Troyanovskaya M, Song L, Jayaraman G, Healy DP.
Expression of aminopeptidase A, an
angiotensinase, in glomerular
mesangial cells. Hypertension. 1996;27:518522.
29. Mentzel S, Van Son J, De Jong AS, Dijkman H, Koene RAP, Wetzels JFM, Assmann KJM. Mouse glomerular epithelial cells in culture with features of podocytes in vivo express aminopeptidase A and angiotensinogen but not other components of the renin-angiotensin system. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:706719.[Abstract]
30. Wolf G, Assmann KJM, Stahl RAK. Overexpression of aminopeptidase A abolishes the growth promoting effects of angiotensin II in cultured mouse mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 1997;52:12501260.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Burns KD, Homma T, Harris RC. The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system. Semin Nephrol. 1993;13:1330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Liu FY, Cogan MG. Angiotensin II stimulation of hydrogen ion secretion in the rat early proximal tubule. Modes of action, mechanism, and kinetics. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:601607.
33.
Saccomani G, Mitchell KD, Navar LG.
Angiotensin II stimulation of Na(+)-H+ exchange in proximal
tubule cells. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:F1188F1195.
34. Schuster VL, Kokko JP, Jacobson HR. Angiotensin II directly stimulates sodium transport in rabbit proximal convoluted tubules. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:507515.
35. Mitchell KD, Braam B, Navar LG. Hypertensinogenic mechanisms mediated by renal actions of renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension. 1992;19:I-18I-27.
36.
Ploth DW. Angiotensin-dependent renal
mechanisms in two-kidney, one-clip renal vascular hypertension.
Am J Physiol. 1983;245:F131F141.
37.
Huang WC, Ploth DW, Navar LG.
Angiotensin-mediated alterations in nephron function in
Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1982;243:F553F560.
38. Huang WC, Ploth DW, Navar LG. Effects of saralasin infusion on bilateral renal function in two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Clin Sci. 1982;62:573579.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Guan S, Fox J, Mitchell KD, Navar LG.
Angiotensin and angiotensin-converting enzyme
tissue levels in two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1992;20:763767.
40. Samani NJ, Godfrey NP, Major JS, Brammar WJ, Swales JD. Kidney renin mRNA levels in the early and chronic phases of two-kidney, one clip hypertension in the rat. J Hypertens. 1989;7:105112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Zou LX, Hymel A, Imig JD, Navar LG. Renal
accumulation of circulating angiotensin II in
angiotensin II-infused rats. Hypertension. 1996;27:658662.
42.
Zou LX, Imig JD, von Thun AM, Hymel A, Ono H, Navar LG.
Receptor-mediated intrarenal angiotensin II augmentation in
angiotensin II-infused rats. Hypertension. 1996;28:669677.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Padia, B. A. Kemp, N. L. Howell, M.-C. Fournie-Zaluski, B. P. Roques, and R. M. Carey Conversion of Renal Angiotensin II to Angiotensin III Is Critical for AT2 Receptor-Mediated Natriuresis In Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 460 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. FitzGerald, B. A. Murray, and D. J. Walsh Hypotensive Peptides from Milk Proteins J. Nutr., April 1, 2004; 134(4): 980S - 988S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ino, C. Uehara, F. Kikkawa, H. Kajiyama, K. Shibata, T. Suzuki, E. E. Khin, M. Ito, M. Takeuchi, A. Itakura, et al. Enhancement of Aminopeptidase A Expression during Angiotensin II-Induced Choriocarcinoma Cell Proliferation through AT1 Receptor Involving Protein Kinase C- and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Dependent Signaling Pathway J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3973 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Troyanovskaya, G. Jayaraman, L. Song, and D. P. Healy Aminopeptidase-A. I. cDNA cloning and expression and localization in rat tissues Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): R413 - R424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Jiang, M. Troyanovskaya, G. Jayaraman, and D. P. Healy Aminopeptidase-A. II. Genomic cloning and characterization of the rat promoter Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): R425 - R434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |