(Hypertension. 1999;33:769-774.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, University of Padova, Padova, Italy (P.P., O.V.); and the Division of Hypertension, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (S.N., J.A., S.M., M.V., S.J.).
Correspondence to Paolo Palatini, MD, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale-Clinica Medica 4, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. E-mail palatini{at}ux1.unipd.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: sympathetic tone insulin obesity heart rate hemodynamics hypertension
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studying these associations in siblings may help us to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of this condition. Recently, we had the opportunity to study the offspring of subjects previously enrolled in the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study.12 The aim of the present study was to investigate the hemodynamic, neurohumoral, and metabolic features in offspring of parents who had a hypersympathetic-hyperdynamic circulation characterized by increased heart rate, elevated stroke volume, and enhanced cardiac contractility.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Offspring
Two hundred eight children aged 11 to 26 years for whom
parents' echocardiographic data were available were
included in this analysis. Their clinical characteristics by
gender are reported in Table 1. The children were examined at
the same field office in Tecumseh, Mich, in which their parents had
been examined.9 12 A battery of psychosocial,
anthropometric, hemodynamic, and biochemical measures
was obtained in each subject. All subjects read and signed an informed
consent form, and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics
Review Board of the University of Michigan.
Measurements
Procedures used for clinical heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac
index, and left ventricular fractional shortening
measurements, anthropometric data collection, and blood sample
processing in the children were the same as those used for parents in
the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study.12 Heart rate was also
measured during Stroop's color test, a computerized conflict-evoking
test.9 Skinfold thickness was measured in triplicate at
the triceps, biceps, and subscapular and suprailiac areas with a manual
caliper, and the average of the 12 measurements was defined as
skinfold thickness.
The method used to measure cardiac output in parents and children has been reported previously.12 In brief, cardiac output was assessed by a 2D Doppler echocardiography technique using images of the aortic root. The diameter of the aortic root was measured at the level of aortic leaflets during midsystole, and the aortic cross-sectional area was calculated. Aortic outflow was measured with a continuous Doppler transmitter from the suprasternal notch using previously described procedures.12
Data Analysis
Offspring data were analyzed according to their
parents' cardiac index. Determinants of cardiac index were assessed by
linear regression analysis, with cardiac index as the dependent
variable and age, gender, and BMI as independent variables.
Cardiac index values were adjusted for age, gender, and BMI by standard
statistical methods. Parents were subsequently grouped into tertiles of
adjusted cardiac index, and children were grouped according to whether
their parents' cardiac index was in the bottom, middle, or top
tertile. When data from both parents were available, the average of the
readings from mother and father (midparent) was used in the
classification.13 Between-tertile differences were
assessed using a general linear model procedure. Data were adjusted for
possible confounders. The independent association of children's BMI
with parents' clinical characteristics was studied with multiple
forward regression analysis using children's BMI as the
dependent variable and parents' age, BMI, cardiac index, blood
pressure, and heart rate as independent variables. Data are
mean±SEM unless specified otherwise. Significance was accepted at
P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Offspring of parents with a high cardiac index were heavier, had an increased degree of adiposity, and had a greater waist/hip ratio than offspring of parents with an intermediate or low cardiac index (Table 3 and Figure 2). Blood pressure was higher in offspring of parents in the top tertile, a difference that was significant for diastolic blood pressure (Table 3). Child's heart rate tended to increase with increasing level of parents' cardiac index, especially when measured during the Stroop test. Insulin and insulin/glucose ratio were both elevated in offspring of parents with hyperdynamic circulation (Figure 2 and Table 3); these children also had higher levels of triglycerides. Children's cardiac index and left ventricular fractional shortening did not differ between the 3 groups (Table 3).
|
|
To determine which parental clinical variables influenced children's BMI and plasma insulin level, a series of multiple linear regression analyses was performed, first keeping the parents grouped together and then separating fathers from mothers, using parents' age, BMI, cardiac index, clinical heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and gender (where applicable) as independent variables. As expected, parental BMI was the strongest predictor of offspring BMI (P=0.0001), followed by parental cardiac index (P=0.003) and age (P=0.05). This association was mostly explained by the mother-child relationship (P=0.009 for cardiac index), whereas the cardiac indexBMI association did not reach statistical significance for the father-child relationship. Similar relationships with cardiac index were found when children's plasma insulin level was considered as the dependent variable (P=0.003 for parents taken together, 0.01 for mothers, and NS for fathers).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, parents with hyperdynamic circulation did not differ from other parents in body weight or metabolic variables. Nevertheless, the results show that offspring of parents with hyperdynamic circulation have a genetic predisposition to development of overweight and other features of insulin resistance syndrome. In fact, offspring of parents in the top tertile of cardiac index had an increased BMI and degree of adiposity, abnormal fat distribution, higher diastolic blood pressure, hyperinsulinemia, and slightly elevated triglyceride levels. After adjustment for BMI, most of these differences disappeared. The latter finding is in agreement with the results of Stern et al2 obtained in subjects with hyperdynamic circulation, in whom an attenuation of the relationship between hyperkinetic state and features of insulin resistance syndrome was found when BMI was accounted for. The importance of the relationship between parental hyperdynamic circulation and the features of insulin resistance is emphasized by the positive independent association between parental cardiac index and offspring BMI found in multiple regression analysis, in which parental BMI was included. It is noteworthy to observe that most of this association was explained by mother-child relationship. Parental BMI was a strong predictor of children's BMI, confirming the results of other investigators.14
As a result of the cardiac index stratification, there were large differences in heart rate, left ventricular contractility, and plasma epinephrine level between the 3 groups of parents, documenting the existence of increased sympathetic tone in the top cardiac index tertile. In the offspring, we could still detect some evidence of enhanced sympathetic tone (faster resting heart rate and excessive tachycardia in response to the Stroop test), but the leading features were overweight, elevated plasma insulin level, and higher blood pressure.
At first glance, it is difficult to explain why the phenotypes
in parents and offspring are so different. However, the fascinating
association of parental circulatory abnormalities with
metabolic abnormalities in offspring may in part reflect
the classification of parents. A substantial downregulation of
ß-adrenergic responsiveness (presumably in response to a
long-standing sympathetic overdrive) has been described in patients
with "normokinetic" borderline hypertension15 and with
hypertension in general.16 17 18 Along the line of our
interest in the hyperkinetic state9 12 19 in this study,
we classified the parents according to tertiles of cardiac index. It is
likely that the top tertile consisted of individuals able to respond to
the sympathetic overdrive with high cardiac output, increased stroke
volume, fast heart rate, and enhanced cardiac
contractility. Generally, cardiac output and heart rate
decrease with age,20 and in the top cardiac index tertile,
we identified subjects in the fourth decade of life whose
ß-adrenergic responsiveness had been preserved. In a series of
experiments, Landsberg and Kreiger6 documented that
enhanced sympathetic tone increases feeding-induced facultative
thermogenesis. This increase in metabolic rate is viewed as
an essential compensatory mechanism to ward off future increases in
body weight. Importantly, the thermogenic effect of sympathetic
stimulation is mediated through ß-adrenergic
receptors.21 22 If both circulatory and
metabolic ß-adrenergic responsiveness had been preserved
in parents in the present study, metabolic
ß-adrenergic responsiveness may have prevented them from gaining
weight. In fact, in a previous report of the Tecumseh study, we
noted that patients with hyperkinetic hypertension (whose
ß-adrenergic responsiveness was similarly preserved as in
normotensive hyperdynamic individuals in the present report) were
not obese.10 The fact that children of hyperkinetic
parents had no increase in cardiac index and left
ventricular ejective function suggests that their
ß-adrenergic responsiveness did not differ from that of their peers.
If the sympathetic overactivity of parents in the present study has
been passed on to children but the offspring did not share the parents
resistance to downregulation of ß-adrenergic responsiveness, they may
have responded to sympathetic stimulation with insulin resistance,
dyslipidemia, and increased body weight. The mechanism by
which sympathetic stimulation causes insulin resistance and
dyslipidemia has been discussed elsewhere.23
Our data suggest that in the future, it may well be worth testing the
hypothesis that downregulation of ß-adrenoreceptor
responsiveness, against a background of enhanced sympathetic tone,
leads to overweight. The recent observation that markedly obese
children have increased baseline plasma epinephrine levels and
have a diminished lipolytic response to infusions of
physiological doses of adrenaline24
adds further credence to the hypothesis. Decreased mobilization of
triglycerides in these children may contribute to the
accumulation of fat in adipocytes. However, at present, it is not
known whether the defective lipolytic response to adrenaline is
mediated by
, ß2, or
ß3 adrenoreceptors.
A body of evidence suggests that elevated heart rate is a risk factor for future hypertension and development of atherosclerotic lesions.25 26 27 This seems to be due to the coaggregation of fast heart rate with high blood pressure, overweight, increased plasma insulin level, and dyslipidemias.28 Sympathetic overactivity underlying tachycardia is the likely explanation for this association, even though other factors can interact to promote this clinical condition, as recently postulated by some investigators.29 The results of the present study suggest that this coaggregation can be genetically transmitted, even though the expression of the genetic defect may differ among siblings. As indicated above, we believe that ß-adrenergic responsiveness may affect the phenotypic expression of the underlying sympathetic overactivity in parents and offspring. The nature of these modifiers of the phenotype is not understood. It is conceivable that other genetic factors affect ß-adrenergic responsiveness, but environmental factors could also play a role. Diet may have an influence on offspring modifying the phenotypic manifestations of the syndrome. It has been reported that sodium intake affects ß-adrenergic responsiveness.30 31 32 It is also possible that the education and socioeconomic status of the offspring differed from those of the parents and that these environmental differences had some other unknown effect on the phenotype.
In summary, we found that parental hyperdynamic circulation was an important predictor of the child's overweight, abnormal fat distribution, increased blood pressure, and hyperinsulinemia. The mother-child relationship accounted for most of this association. These data suggest that sympathetic overactivity underlying hyperdynamic circulation is a key factor in the development of obesity and insulin resistance. The clinical traits related to insulin resistance syndrome are a complex coaggregation of factors in which the clinically defined phenotype can arise through a wide array of pathophysiological mechanisms. Nongenetic or genetic factors affecting ß-adrenergic responsiveness may play a role in modulating expression of the genetic defect.
Received September 17, 1998; first decision October 26, 1998; accepted November 19, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Stern MP, Morales PA, Haffner SM, Valdez RA.
Hyperdynamic circulation and the insulin resistance syndrome
("Syndrome X"). Hypertension. 1992;20:802808.
3.
Xiaozhang J, Srinavasan SR, Urbina E, Berenson GS.
Hyperdynamic circulation and cardiovascular risk in
children and adolescents. Circulation. 1995;91:11011106.
4.
Bao W, Srinavasan SR, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS. The
relation of parental cardiovascular disease to risk
factors in children and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study.
Circulation. 1995;91:365371.
5.
Charles MA, Pettitt DJ, Hanson RL, Bennette PH, Saad
MF, Liu QZ, Knowler WC. Familial and metabolic factors
related to blood pressure in Pima Indian children. Am J
Epidemiol. 1994;140:123131.
6. Landsberg L, Krieger DR. Obesity, metabolism, and the sympathetic nervous system. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2(suppl 3, pt 2):125S132S.
7.
Landsberg L. Hyperinsulinemia:
possible role in obesity-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;19:161166.
8. Krieger DR, Landsberg L. Obesity and hypertension. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:23672388.
9. Julius S, Krause L, Schork N, Mejia A, Jones K, van de Ven C, Johnson EH, Sekkarie MA, Kjeldsen SE, Petrin J, Schmouder R, Gupta R, Ferraro J, Nazzaro P, Weissfeld J. Hyperkinetic borderline hypertension in Tecumseh, Michigan. J Hypertens. 1991;9:7784.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Julius S, Jamerson K. Sympathetics, insulin resistance and coronary risk in hypertension: the `chicken-and-egg' question. J Hypertens. 1994;12:495502.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Palatini P, Casiglia E, Pauletto P, Staessen J,
Kaciroti N, Julius S. Relationship of tachycardia with high
blood pressure and metabolic abnormalities: a study with
mixture analysis in three populations. Hypertension. 1997;30:12671273.
12.
Julius S, Jamerson K, Mejia A, Krause L, Schork N,
Jones K. The association of borderline hypertension with target organ
changes and higher coronary risk: Tecumseh Blood Pressure
Study. JAMA. 1990;264:354358.
13.
Jamerson K, Schork N, Julius S. Effect of home blood
pressure and gender on estimates of the familial aggregation of blood
pressure: the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study. Hypertension. 1992;20:314318.
14.
Annest JL, Sing CF, Biron P. Familial aggregation of
blood pressure and weight in adoptive families, III: analysis
of the role of shared genes and shared household environment in
explaining family resemblance for height, weight and selected
weight/height indices. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:492506.
15. Julius S, Randall OS, Esler MD, Kashima T, Ellis CN, Bennett J. Altered cardiac responsiveness and regulation in the normal cardiac output type of borderline hypertension. Circ Res. 1975;36/37(suppl I):I199I207.
16. Kjeldsen SE, Zweifler AJ, Petrin J, Weder AB, Julius S. Sympathetic nervous system involvement in essential hypertension: increased platelet noradrenaline coincides with decreased ß-adrenoreceptor responsiveness. Blood Press. 1994;3:164171.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Trimarco B, Volpe M, Ricciardelli B, Picotti GB, Galva
MA, Petracca R. Studies of the mechanisms underlying impairment of
beta-adrenoreceptor-mediated effects in human
hypertension. Hypertension. 1983;5:584590.
18.
Bertel O, Buhler F, Kiowski W, Lutold BE. Decreased
beta-adrenoreceptor responsiveness is related to age,
blood pressure, and plasma catecholamines in patients with
essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1980;2:130138.
19.
Julius S, Conway J. Hemodynamic
studies in patients with borderline blood pressure elevation.
Circulation. 1968;38:282288.
20. Julius S, Egan B. Hemodynamics of hypertension. In: Zanchetti A, Tarazi RC, eds. Handbook of Hypertension. Vol 7: Pathophysiology of Hypertension-Cardiovascular Aspects. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc; 1986:153178.
21. Blaak EE, Saris WH, van Baak MA. Adrenoreceptor subtypes mediating catecholamine-induced thermogenesis in man. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17(suppl 3):S78S81.
22. Blaak EE, van Baak MA, Kester AD, Saris WH. ß-Adrenergically mediated thermogenic and heart rate responses: effect of obesity and weight loss. Metabolism. 1995;44:520524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Julius S. Corcoran lecture. Sympathetic hyperactivity and coronary risk in hypertension. Hypertension. 1993;21(part 2):886893.
24. Bougneres P, Stunff CL, Pecqueur C, Pinglier E, Adnot P, Ricquier D. In vivo resistance of lipolysis to epinephrine: a new feature of childhood onset obesity. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:25682573.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Dyer AR, Persky V, Stamler J, Paul O, Shekelle RB,
Berkson DM, Lepper M, Schoenberger JA, Lindberg HA. Heart rate as a
prognostic factor for coronary heart disease and mortality:
findings in three Chicago epidemiologic studies. Am J
Epidemiol. 1980;112:736749.
26. Kannel WB, Wilson P, Blair SN. Epidemiologic assessment of the role of physical activity and fitness in development of cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1985;109:876885.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Gillum RF, Makuc DM, Feldman JJ. Pulse rate, coronary heart disease, and death: the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Am Heart J. 1991;121:172177.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Palatini P, Julius S. Heart rate and cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens. 1997;15:317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Kurtz TW, Gardner DG. Transcription-modulating drugs: a
new frontier in the treatment of essential hypertension.
Hypertension. 1998;32:380386.
30. Volpe M, Trimarco B, Ricciardelli B, Sacca L, Ungaro B, Rengo F, Condorelli M. Effects of oral salt loading on beta-adrenergic receptor responsiveness in normal and hypertensive subjects. Cardiovasc Res. 1982;16:732737.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kjeldsen SE, Zweifler AJ, Petrin J, Weder A, Julius S. Sympathetic nervous system involvement in essential hypertension: increased platelet noradrenaline coincides with decreased beta-adrenoreceptor responsiveness. Blood Press. 1994;3:164171.
32. Kjeldsen SE, Moan A, Petrin J, Weder A, Julius S. Effects of increased arterial epinephrine on insulin, glucose and phosphate. Blood Press. 1996;5:2731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Julius, M. Valentini, and P. Palatini Overweight and Hypertension : A 2-Way Street? Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 807 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |