(Hypertension. 1999;33:1057-1061.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
Alexithymia
A Facet of Essential Hypertension
From the Research and Development Centre of the Social Insurance Institution, Turku, Finland (A.J., J.K.S.); and the Department of Psychiatry, Turku University Central Hospital (S.S.).
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Antti Jula, Research and Development Centre, Social Insurance Institution, Peltolantie 3, FIN-20720 Turku, Finland.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract—Two hundred thirty-seven newly diagnosed yet untreated hypertensive men and women, 35 to 54 years of age, were compared with an age- and gender-stratified random population sample of 146 normotensive men and women to find out whether psychological distress symptoms, anger expression, and alexithymia are associated with elevated blood pressure and whether the possible associations are independent of sodium and alcohol intake, body mass index, and physical fitness. The independent attributes of mean arterial pressure were studied by multivariate regression analyses after combining the subjects in the hypertensive and control groups. Three questionnaires were used: the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-37), a 31-item version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26). Total scores of the TAS-26 were higher (P<0.001) in hypertensive men and women than in their normotensive control subjects (75.6±7.8 vs 64.1±9.8 in men and 72.9±7.1 vs 57.5±11.5 in women). There were no differences between the study and control groups in psychological distress symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and hostility, or in anger expression. In multivariate regression analyses, higher age, male gender, higher sodium intake, lower physical fitness, and alexithymia were independently and highly significantly (P<0.01 for male gender, P<0.0001 for other variables) associated with increased blood pressure, explaining altogether 39.5% of the cross-sectional variation in mean arterial pressure. We conclude that alexithymia, that is, poor ability to experience and express emotions, is associated with elevated blood pressure independent of sodium and alcohol intake, body mass index, and physical fitness.
Key Words: hypertension, essential • alexithymia • sodium • alcohol • body mass index • physical fitness • stress, psychological
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Psychological factors can raise blood pressure acutely, but whether they lead to development of essential hypertension, as stated by Alexander1 in his early psychosomatic hypothesis, is not known. The hypothesis has been addressed in many cross-sectional studies and in a small number of prospective studies. Suppressed feelings, anger and hostility,2 3 4 5 alexithymia,6 anxiety,4 5 7 8 9 depression,9 job strain,10 stressful work conditions,11 and psychosocial stress12 13 are the most common factors associated with elevated blood pressure. Some studies on suppressed hostility3 5 and increased anxiety14 as possible psychosomatic mechanisms in hypertension suggest that they may have a role in the development of mild high-renin essential hypertension. Prospective studies support the view that suppressed feelings2 and especially suppressed anger5 are of importance in predicting blood pressure rise with age, whereas others do not find any association between anger behavior and change in blood pressure over time.4 7 8 15 Several studies suggest that high anxiety levels predict later incidence of hypertension, at least in subgroups of subjects,5 7 8 9 whereas negative findings have also been reported.4 A 30-year follow-up study suggests that lack of psychosocial stress may prevent blood pressure rise with age.13
Environmental factors play a significant role in the development of essential hypertension. High sodium and alcohol intakes and obesity are associated with blood pressure rise with age.16 17 18 Physically fit persons have lower incidence of hypertension when compared with less fit persons.19 20 Low level of education is related to higher blood pressure.21 The relation is largely explained by lifestyle factors.21 However, surprisingly little is known about the possible interactions between psychological factors, lifestyle factors, and blood pressure.
We compared newly diagnosed yet untreated, moderately to severely hypertensive subjects with a population sample of men and women of matching age to find out if anger expression, anxiety, hostility, depression, or alexithymia, that is, poor ability to experience and express emotions, are associated with hypertension. Moreover, we wanted to study if the possible associations are independent or partly mediated by lifestyle factors.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Newly diagnosed yet untreated, moderately to severely hypertensive men and women, 35 to 54 years of age, residing in the city of Turku and 3 neighboring municipalities (a population of
200 000
inhabitants) in southwestern Finland, were recruited into the study.
The inclusion criteria were a systolic or a
diastolic blood pressure consistently in the range
of 180 to 220 mm Hg or 100 to 120 mm Hg,
respectively, as measured within the primary health care. Patients with
coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease,
insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, or hemodynamically
significant valvular disease were excluded from the study. Two
hundred thirty-seven out of 252 subjects met the inclusion criteria.
For a control group, a random sample of men and women residing in the
same area was drawn from the national population register. For
stratification, 45 subjects of each gender and each 10-year age group
(35 to 44 and 45 to 54) were chosen. Subjects with antihypertensive
medication or a systolic or a diastolic blood
pressure of 
140 mm Hg or 90 mm Hg, respectively,
were excluded from the control group. Sixty-eight out of 83 men and 78
out of 91 women met the inclusion criteria. The study was conducted
following the Second Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the
ethical committee of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. All
subjects gave their informed consent.
Examinations and Measurements
Blood pressure was measured by a trained nurse. It was
recorded in seated posture with a mercury sphygmomanometer, always
between 8 and 10 AM, according to the guidelines of the
American Society of Hypertension.22 A cuff with a bladder
width of 15 cm was used. Subjects were requested to refrain from heavy
exercise in the morning and to avoid cola drinks, coffee, tea, and
smoking for at least 1 hour before the measurement. Blood pressure was
averaged over duplicate measures obtained in 4 separate sessions within
3 weeks. Body weight was measured in light clothing without shoes with
an accuracy of 0.1 kg and height with an accuracy of 1 cm.
Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected to determine sodium and
creatinine excretions. Sodium was analyzed by
emission flame photometry and creatinine by the Jaffé
method. A 24-hour urine collection was accepted as complete if its
creatinine content was >7.8 mmol for men and
>6.9 mmol for women. These were the 2.5 percentile values of the
24-hour urinary creatinine of the 100 men and 100 women who
had participated in the Intersalt study16 in Turku.
Altogether 97.1% of urine collections in men and 90.4% of urine
collections in women were complete according to these criteria.
Seven-day alcohol intake was assessed by means of a questionnaire. The
alcoholic drinks were converted to grams of absolute ethanol. Maximal
oxygen uptake (L · kg-1 ·
min-1) was estimated indirectly by means of an
incremental cycle exercise test.23
Three self-report questionnaires were used to assess the psychological
factors: the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-37),24 the
shortened 31-item version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anger
Expression Inventory (STAXI), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale
(TAS-26).25 26 The BSI-37 is a shortened version of the
original 53-item BSI,27 which has been shown to have
acceptable reliability in psychiatric patients and in general
populations as a global measure of psychological distress. The BSI-37,
which has been validated in a Finnish population study,24
does not cover psychotic symptoms. We used the general severity index,
that is, the total score of the BSI-37 (range 0 to 148), as an
indicator of psychological distress. The BSI-37 also gives symptom
dimensions for somatization, depression, anxiety, hostility, and
phobicity. A shortened Finnish translation of the original 44-item
STAXI28 has been validated in a Finnish twin
study.29 The 31-item STAXI assesses the intensity of
feelings of anger (state anger) by 7 items, the disposition to
experience anger (trait anger) by 6 items, behaviorally expressed anger
(anger out) by 6 items, suppressed anger (anger in) by 6 items, and
self-control of anger behavior (anger control) by 6 items. The 26-item
TAS published in the mid-1980s is a psychometrically well-validated and
reliable instrument for the assessment of
alexithymia.25 26 30 It is clustered into 4 factors:
difficulty in identifying and distinguishing between feelings and
bodily sensations (Factor 1); difficulty in describing feelings (Factor
2); reduced daydreaming (Factor 3); and externally oriented thinking
(Factor 4). The TAS-26 used in our study has been translated into
Finnish and retranslated into English. The accuracy of the
retranslation has been checked by a native speaker of English with
academic education. The Finnish translation of the TAS-26 has been
validated in a Finnish population study.31 We used the
total score of the TAS-26 (range 26 to 130) as an indicator of
alexithymia. To assess the prevalence of alexithymia, the TAS-26 total
scores were categorized according to the clinically evaluated cutoff
points suggested by the Toronto group: total score of 74
points indicates alexithymia and 
64 points indicates that no
alexithymia is present.26
Statistics
The values are given as mean±SD. Statistical
analysis of the data were performed with SAS computer programs
(SAS Institute). Group mean values were compared by a 2-way ANOVA
grouped on gender and disease status. If significant, Tukey's
studentized range test was used for within-gender comparisons of
normotensives and hypertensives. The test gives significancies only on
the level of <0.05. Correlation and regression analyses were
performed after combining the subjects in the hypertensive and control
groups. Associations between the studied variables were tested by
calculating bivariate Pearson's product moment coefficients and
gender-, age-, and gender/age-adjusted partial correlation
coefficients. To find out independent correlates of blood pressure and
predictors of alexithymia, multiple linear regression analyses
were made by use of the statistically significant (P<0.05)
correlates. Before the analyses, a variable with skewed
distribution (alcohol intake) was moved closer to normality by use of
its natural logarithm.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Demographic and Lifestyle Characteristics
Hypertensive and normotensive subjects did not differ in their socioeconomic status (Table 1). As compared with their normotensive control subjects, hypertensive men and women were slightly older, had higher relative body weights and 24-hour urinary sodium excretions, and slightly lower maximal oxygen uptakes (Table 1). There were fewer smokers among hypertensive than among normotensive men and women (Table 1). Hypertensive and normotensive subjects consumed alcohol in equal amounts (Table 1).
|
Psychological Characteristics and Symptoms
The mean of total scores of the TAS-26 was higher
(P<0.001) in hypertensive men and women than in their
control subjects (Table 2). Hypertensive
subjects had more (P<0.001) difficulties in identifying
(TAS-26 Factor 1) and describing (TAS-26 Factor 2) feelings, more
(P<0.001) of externally oriented thinking (TAS-26 Factor
4), and slightly less (P<0.05) daydreaming (TAS-26 Factor
3). In comparison with their normotensive control subjects,
hypertensive men and women were differently (P<0.001)
distributed in the 3 TAS-26 score categories. Prevalence of alexithymia
was higher among hypertensive men (57%) and women (46%) than among
normotensive men (18%) and women (9%). Only 4% of hypertensive men
and 5% of hypertensive women but 54% of normotensive men and 73% of
normotensive women were nonalexithymic.
|
There were no differences between the study and control groups in state-anger, trait-anger, anger-out, anger-in, and anger-control behavior (Table 3). Hypertensive women had more somatization symptoms than did normotensive women (Table 3). The study and control groups did not differ in depression, anxiety, hostility, or phobicity or in the general severity index of the BSI-37.
|
Correlates of Blood Pressure in Multivariate Analyses
In multivariate analyses with
statistically significant gender-adjusted correlates of mean
arterial pressure, 39.5% of the variation in mean
arterial pressure was explained by age, gender (female 0,
male 1), 24-hour urine sodium, maximal oxygen uptake, and total score
of the TAS-26 (Table 4). In a model in
which total score of the TAS-26 was not included, 25.2% of the
variation in mean arterial pressure was explained by age
(P<0.0001), gender (P<0.05), body mass index
(P<0.0001), and 24-hour urine sodium
(P<0.0001).
|
Demographic and Lifestyle Correlates of Alexithymia in
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses
Total score of the TAS-26 correlated positively with age
(R=0.12, P<0.05), body mass index
(R=0.25, P<0.001), alcohol intake
(R=0.13, P<0.01), and 24-hour urine sodium level
(R=0.20, P<0.001). The inverse association of
total score of the TAS-26 with maximal oxygen uptake became significant
(R=-0.16, P<0.01), and the association with
alcohol intake disappeared after adjustment for gender. In
multivariate analyses with gender, age, and
lifestyle factors, 11.4% of the variation in the total score of
alexithymia was explained by gender (P<0.0001) and body
mass index (P<0.0001).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Our study showed that alexithymia, that is, poor ability to experience and express emotions and proneness to externally oriented thinking, differentiates men and women with untreated hypertension from their normotensive control subjects, whereas anger expression (including suppressed anger) or psychological distress symptoms (including anxiety, depression, and hostility) do not. Hypertensive women had more somatization (bodily sensations) than did normotensive women. In accordance with earlier studies, higher age,16 male gender,32 33 higher sodium intake,16 and lower physical fitness19 20 were associated with elevated blood pressure. Almost 40% of the cross-sectional variation in mean arterial pressure was attributed to age, gender, sodium intake, physical fitness, and alexithymia. Age, gender, and lifestyle factors alone explained
25% of the variation in mean
arterial pressure. A relatively small portion of the
association between blood pressure and alexithymia was mediated by
lifestyle factors, mainly by higher relative body weight. Psychological distress symptoms may fluctuate with time.34 On the contrary, alexithymia is generally considered as a stable personality trait.31 34 35 A recent population study showed that alexithymia is associated with male gender, low educational level, low socioeconomic status, and weakly associated with advanced age.36 In our study, normotensive men were alexithymic twice as often as normotensive women, but the difference in alexithymic personality features was small between hypertensive men and women. Our normotensive and hypertensive subjects were practically of matching age and had a similar socioeconomic status. Hypertensive men and women had no signs and symptoms of coexisting cardiovascular diseases. Thus factors other than age, socioeconomic status, and coexisting diseases explain the high prevalence of alexithymia observed in our hypertensive subjects.
Because of the cross-sectional nature of our study, we cannot draw any conclusions concerning the causality of the relations between alexithymia and essential hypertension. Our hypertensive and normotensive subjects did not report differences in psychological distress symptoms, which suggests that alexithymia hardly is a reaction to the awareness of having elevated blood pressure.
Theories of the causes of alexithymia range from neurobiological to sociocultural ones. Neurobiological theories suggest that alexithymia may be related to an interruption of the limbic-neocortical communication, may be a result of a deficit in interhemispheric communication, or may be a result of a dysfunction in the right cerebral hemisphere.35 37 Psychological theories suggest that growing up in an emotionally poor and unstimulating environment or that a massive psychological trauma later in life could result in alexithymia.38 Recently, it has been suggested that alexithymia, regardless of its cause, reflects a deficit in cognitive processing and regulation of emotions.35 Poor ability to be aware of and to cope with emotions may make an alexithymic individual vulnerable to continuous stress.
Our study group consisted of untreated hypertensive patients and the control group of a random population sample of healthy men and women, all 35 to 54 years of age. To ensure that the sample of hypertensive patients would represent normal clinical settings, all local primary care physicians were requested to send patients with uncomplicated yet untreated sustained hypertension to the study. The ratio of hypertensive men to hypertensive women was 1.4, corresponding to the national ratio of hypertensive men and women of the same age.32 The random sample can be considered representative of the target population because the participation rate was >80%.39 Blood pressure was measured carefully by a trained nurse and averaged over 4 duplicate measures. We have earlier shown that this technique is as reliable as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in assessment of an individual's blood pressure status.40 It also gives considerably lower blood pressure values compared with the usual measurements made by nurses or physicians within the primary health care.40 According to the carefully controlled repeated blood pressure measurements, only 20% of our hypertensives had a moderate and 5% a severe hypertension.40 A single, carefully conducted 24-hour urine collection was used for estimation of sodium intake. More than 90% of the urine collections were determined to be complete. Our study may still underestimate the association of dietary sodium with blood pressure, mostly because of the known large intraindividual variability in daily sodium intake, compared with smaller interindividual differences.41 42
In summary, alexithymia, that is, poor ability to experience and express emotions, is associated with elevated blood pressure independent of sodium and alcohol intake, body mass index, and physical fitness. Prospective studies measuring alexithymic personality features before elevated blood pressure as well as studies dealing with the neurogenic mechanisms of alexithymia are needed to elucidate its role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.
Received October 1, 1998; first decision November 24, 1998; accepted December 2, 1998.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Alexander F. Emotional factors in essential hypertension. Psychosom Med. 1939;1:175–179.
2. Kahn HA, Medalie JH, Neufeld HN, Riss E, Goldbourt U. The incidence of hypertension and associated factors: the Israel Ischemic Heart Disease Study. Am Heart J. 1972;84:171–182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Esler M, Julius S, Zweifler A, Randall O, Harburg E, Gardiner H, DeQuattro V. Mild high-renin essential hypertension: neurogenic human hypertension? N Engl J Med.. 1977;296:405–411.[Abstract]
4. Jenkins CD, Somervell PD, Hames CG. Does blood pressure usually rise with age?... or with stress? J Hum Stress. 1983;9:4–12.
5. Perini C, Müller FB, Bühler FR. Suppressed aggression accelerates early development of essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991;9:499–503.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Todarello O, Taylor GJ, Parker JDA, Fanelli M. Alexithymia in essential hypertension and psychiatric outpatients: a comparative study. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39:987–994.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Markowitz JH, Matthews KA, Wing RR, Kuller LH, Meilahn EN. Psychological, health behavior and biological predictors of blood pressure change in middle-aged women. J Hypertens. 1991;9:399–406.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Markowitz JH, Matthews KA, Kannel WB, Cobb JL,
D'Agostino RB. Psychological predictors of hypertension in the
Framingham Study: is there tension in hypertension? JAMA.. 1993;270:2439–2443.
9.
Jonas BS, Franks P, Ingram DD. Are symptoms of anxiety
and depression risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence
from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I
Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:43–49.
10.
Schnall PL, Pieper C, Schwartz JE, Karasek RA,
Schlussel Y, Devereux RB, Ganau A, Alderman M, Warren K, Pickering TG.
The relationship between job strain, workplace diastolic
blood pressure, and left ventricular mass index: results of
a case-control study. JAMA. 1990;263:1929–1935.
11.
Matthews KA, Cottington EM, Talbott E, Kuller LH,
Siegel JM. Stressful work conditions and diastolic blood
pressure among blue collar factory workers. Am J
Epidemiol. 1987;126:280–291.
12. Poulter NR, Khaw KT, Hopwood BEC, Mugambi M, Peart WS, Rose G, Sever PS. The Kenyan Luo migration study: observations on the initiation of a rise in blood pressure. BMJ. 1990;300:967–972.
13. Timio M, Lippi G, Venanzi S, Gentili S, Quintaliani G, Verdura C, Monarca C, Saronio P, Timio F. Blood pressure trend and cardiovascular events in nuns in a secluded order: a 30-year follow-up study. Blood Pressure. 1997;6:81–87.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Thailer SA, Friedman R, Harshfield GA, Pickering TG.
Psychologic differences between high-, normal-, and low-renin
hypertensives. Psychosom Med. 1985;47:294–297.
15.
Sparrow D, Garvey AJ, Rosner B, Thomas HE. Factors
in predicting blood pressure change. Circulation. 1982;65:789–794.
16. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte and blood pressure: results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. BMJ. 1988;297:319–328.
17.
Elliott P, Stamler J, Nichols R, Dyer AR, Stamler R,
Kesteloot H, Marmot M for the Intersalt Cooperative Research Group.
Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium
excretion and blood pressure within and across populations.
BMJ. 1996;312:1249–1253.
18.
Marmot MG, Elliott P, Shipley MJ, Dyer AR, Ueshima H,
Beevers DG, Stamler R, Kesteloot H, Rose G, Stamler J. Alcohol and
blood pressure: the Intersalt study. BMJ. 1994;308:1263–1267.
19.
Paffenbarger RS, Wing AL, Hyde RT, Jung DL. Physical
activity and incidence of hypertension in college alumni. Am
J Epidemiol. 1983;117:245–257.
20.
Blair SN, Goodyear NN, Gibbons LW, Cooper KH. Physical
fitness and incidence of hypertension in healthy normotensive men and
women. JAMA. 1984;252:487–490.
21.
Stamler R, Shipley M, Elliott P, Dyer A, Sans S,
Stamler J. Higher blood pressure in adults with less education: some
explanations from Intersalt. Hypertension. 1992;19:237–241.
22. American Society of Hypertension. Public policy position paper: recommendations for routine blood pressure measurement by indirect cuff sphygmomanometry. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:207–209.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Andersen KL, Shephard RJ, Denolin H, Varnauskas E, Masironi R. Fundamentals of exercise testing. Geneva: WHO. 1971;53–82.
24. Kronholm E. Sleep and daytime vigilance: a psychophysiological community study (in Finnish, with an English summary). Publications of the Social Insurance Institution ML:121. Turku. 1993.
25. Taylor GJ, Ryan DB, Bagby RM. Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom.. 1985;44:191–199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Ryan DP, Parker JDA, Doody KF,
Keefe P. Criterion validity of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
Psychosom Med. 1988;50:500–509.
27. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983;13:595–605.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anger Inventory. Research edition, professional manual. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1986.
29. Romanov K, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J. Components of aggressiveness (In Finnish with an English summary). J Soc Med. 1991;28:308–313.
30. Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD, Loiselle C. Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. J Psychosom Res. 1990;34:47–51.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kauhanen J, Julkunen J, Salonen JT. Validity and reliability of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) in a population study. J Psychosom Res. 1992;36:687–694.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Vartiainen E, Puska P, Jousilahti P, Korhonen HJ,
Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A. Twenty-year trends in coronary risk
factors in North Karelia and in other parts of Finland. Int J
Epidemiol. 1994;23:495–502.
33. Dyer AR, Elliott P, on behalf of the Intersalt Co-operative Research Group. The Intersalt study: relations of body mass index to blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1989;3:299–308.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Salminen JK, Saarijärvi S, Äärelä E, Tamminen T. Alexithymia: state or trait? One-year follow-up study of general hospital psychiatric consultation out-patients. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38:681–685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. Disorders of affect regulation: alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
36. Salminen JK, Saarijärvi S, Toikka T, Kauhanen J. Prevalence of alexithymia and its association with sociodemographic variables in the general population of Finland. J Psychosom Res. 1999;46:75–82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Nemiah JC. Denial revisited: reflections on psychosomatic theory. Psychother Psychosom.. 1975;26:140–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Krystal H. Integration and Self-Healing: Affect, Trauma, Alexithymia. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press; 1988.
39. Evans SJW. Good surveys guide. BMJ. 1991;302:302–303.
40. Jula A, Puukka P, Karanko H. Standardized multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the classification of blood pressure status. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8(part 2):97A. Abstract.
41.
Liu K, Cooper R, McKeever J, McKeever P, Byington R,
Stamler R, Gosh F, Stevens E, Stamler J. Assessment of the association
between habitual salt intake and high blood pressure: methodological
problems. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:219–226.
42. Luft FC, Aronoff GR, Fineberg NS. Intra- and interindividual variability in sodium intake in normal subjects and in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 1986;7:375–380.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. K. Mattila, S. I. Saarni, J. K. Salminen, H. Huhtala, H. Sintonen, and M. Joukamaa Alexithymia and Health-Related Quality of Life in a General Population Psychosomatics, January 1, 2009; 50(1): 59 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. K. Mattila, E. Kronholm, A. Jula, J. K. Salminen, A.-M. Koivisto, R.-L. Mielonen, and M. Joukamaa Alexithymia and Somatization in General Population Psychosom Med, July 1, 2008; 70(6): 716 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Conrad, N. F. Weber, M. Lehnert, F. G. Holz, R. Liedtke, and N. Eter Alexithymia and Emotional Distress in Patients With Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Psychosomatics, December 1, 2007; 48(6): 489 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. van Middendorp, R. Geenen, M. J. Sorbi, L. J. P. van Doornen, and J. W. J. Bijlsma Neuroendocrine immune relationships between emotion regulation and health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, July 1, 2005; 44(7): 907 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Byrne and B. Ditto Alexithymia, Cardiovascular Reactivity, and Symptom Reporting During Blood Donation Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(3): 471 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Franz, R. Schaefer, C. Schneider, W. Sitte, and J. Bachor Visual Event-Related Potentials in Subjects With Alexithymia: Modified Processing of Emotional Aversive Information? Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2004; 161(4): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Hagstrom, B. Mattsson, I.-M. Rost, and R. K Gunnarsson What happened to the prescriptions?: A single, short, standardized telephone call may increase compliance Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 46 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Virtanen, A. Jula, J. K. Salminen, L.-M. Voipio-Pulkki, H. Helenius, T. Kuusela, and J. Airaksinen Anxiety and Hostility Are Associated With Reduced Baroreflex Sensitivity and Increased Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability Psychosom Med, September 1, 2003; 65(5): 751 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Schroeder, K. Narkiewicz, M. Kato, C. Pesek, B. Phillips, D. Davison, and V. K. Somers Personality Type and Neural Circulatory Control Hypertension, November 1, 2000; 36(5): 830 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Emotions and Hypertension Journal Watch Cardiology, June 11, 1999; 1999(611): 7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||