(Hypertension. 1999;33:954-960.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
Correspondence to Dr Heimo Ehmke, I. Physiologisches Institut der Ruprecht-Karls Universität, Im Neuenheimer Feld 326, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail ehmke{at}novsrv1.pio1.uni-heidelberg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: gene expression hypertension, renovascular remodeling renin-angiotensin system
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased plasma levels of Ang II, elevated blood pressure, and cardiac hypertrophy are characteristically observed in renovascular hypertension due to stenosis of 1 renal artery. This clinical form of secondary hypertension corresponds to the experimental 2-kidney, 1 clip hypertension model. Recent evidence has shown that renovascular hypertension is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and re-expression of fetal genes.8 9 Similar cardiac alterations have been observed when circulating Ang II levels were elevated experimentally by chronic subcutaneous infusions.10 11
The goal of the present experiments was to assess the importance of interactions between Ang II, mechanical load, and ET-1 in vivo. Since the rat myocardium predominantly expresses the endothelin subtype A (ETA) receptor,12 13 and selective ETA receptor blockade largely attenuated the hypertrophic effects induced by Ang II,1 mechanical load,7 and ET-11 or endothelin-3 (ET-3)2 in cultured cardiac myocytes, we investigated the effects of chronic administration of the orally active, selective ETA receptor antagonist LU 12704314 15 on the temporal development of cardiac hypertrophy and fetal gene expression in renovascular hypertensive rats.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Renal Artery Clipping
Renal artery stenosis was induced under
anesthesia with ketamine/xylazine (100 mg/kg and 4
mg/kg, respectively). The left renal artery was exposed through an
abdominal incision. A stainless steel wire (diameter, 0.3 mm) was
placed next to the renal artery and tightly sutured with silk thread.
Then the wire was removed, leaving the renal artery constricted to the
size of the wire. Sham-operated animals underwent the same surgical
procedure with the exception of suturing of the renal artery. To
evaluate whether the operation had been successful, the kidneys were
weighed after the death of the animals. On day 10, all animals with
renal artery stenosis showed left kidney to right kidney weight
ratios between 0.5 and 0.7 (see Table 2 for series 2; data not
shown for series 1), indicating successful underperfusion but not
ischemic atrophy of the left kidney.16
|
Drugs
Chronic ETA receptor blockade was induced
by administration of LU 127043, the racemic parent drug of the active
(+)-isomer LU 135252, a nonpeptide, selective
ETA receptor antagonist. The
selectivity of LU 127043 for ETA receptors in
rabbit aorta, expressed as the ratio of the affinities for
ETA over endothelin subtype B
(ETB) receptors, is 161.14 LU 127043
was dissolved in 0.1 mol/L NaOH, then diluted in saline to a final
concentration of 20 mg/mL and buffered with 0.1 HCl to a pH of
8.0 to 8.5. Twice a day, 50 mg/kg body weight of LU 127043 was
administered by gastric gavage with the rats under light ether
sedation. Sham-treated rats received saline instead of the
antagonist by the same procedure. In preliminary
experiments in anesthetized rats, the hypotensive response to
0.3 µg/kg of the ETB receptor agonist
sarafotoxin was still preserved after 30 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg of LU
135252 given 1 hour before by gastric gavage, whereas it was completely
blocked after 20 mg/kg of the nonselective
ETA/ETB receptor
antagonist LU 224332, indicating that
ETB receptor signaling was intact in the
ETA receptor antagonisttreated
animals in the present study. Plasma concentrations of ET-1 were
found to be unaffected by chronic oral treatment with 100 mg/kg of LU
135252,17 corresponding to twice the dose of the
ETA receptor antagonist used in the
present study, which confirms the absence of significant
ETB receptor blockade.
Measurement of Plasma Renin Activity
In 39 rats, a chronic catheter was implanted into the abdominal
aorta caudal to the origin of the right renal artery and led to an
incision in the neck. The catheters were implanted either immediately
after clipping or sham clipping of the renal artery (for PRA
determinations on days 2 and 4) or on the eighth day after the first
operation (for PRA determinations on day 10). For measurement of PRA,
animals were put into individual cages, and the catheter was connected
to a syringe. Thirty minutes later, a 1-mL sample of blood was
withdrawn from the awake, unstressed animal and replaced by an equal
volume of saline. After centrifugation, the plasma was
stored at -20°C. For the determination of PRA, plasma samples were
incubated in the presence of 6 mmol/L EDTA, 1.6 mmol/L
dimercaptopropanol, and 100 mmol/L
N-tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminoethanesulfonate
at pH 7.30 and 37°C for 60 minutes. The amount of
angiotensin I (Ang I) formed was determined by
radioimmunoassay.
Determination of Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure was measured between 10
AM and noon by the tail-cuff method in an environmental
chamber heated to 35°C, starting on the first day after surgery. Each
blood pressure value is the average of 2 consistent readings.
During the week before the experiments, each animal was trained daily
in the environmental chamber for 30 to 40 minutes. The validity of the
tail-cuff method to detect changes in blood pressure after renal artery
clipping was confirmed in a separate set of experiments in
sham-operated and renovascular hypertensive rats by
simultaneously recording blood pressure indirectly
by the tail-cuff method and directly by means of a femoral catheter
(data not shown).
RNA Analysis
After 2, 4, or 10 days, the animals were anesthetized as
described above and weighed. The hearts were removed; left ventricles
were weighed and freeze-clamped with stainless steel prongs at the
temperature of liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for
analysis. RNA was extracted from ventricles pulverized under
liquid nitrogen.18 It was confirmed that the probes used
for mRNA analysis hybridized to a single band of the
appropriate molecular weight by Northern blot
analysis.9 For quantification, RNA was blotted to
nitrocellulose in serial dilutions (4, 2, 1 µg RNA per slot) with the
use of a vacuum filtration slot blot apparatus. Blots were
probed consecutively with cDNA probes specific for ß-MHC mRNA
(plasmid containing a 69-bp sequence of rat ß-MHC mRNA was kindly
donated by Professor Schiaffino, Padua, Italy),19
ANP mRNA (plasmid containing a 145-bp, PCR-derived sequence of rat
preproANP mRNA was kindly donated by Professor Forssmann, Hannover,
Germany), and 28 S rRNA. The isolated cDNAs were labeled by the
random priming method. Prehybridization (2 hours; 40% formamide, 5x
SSC, 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 10x Denhardt's
solution, 0.2% SDS, 100 µg yeast tRNA) and hybridization (16 hours,
50% formamide, 3x SSC, 10 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 2x
Denhardt's solution, 0.2% SDS, 50 µg yeast tRNA) were performed at
42°C.20 Blots were washed 2x15 minutes with 2x SSC,
0.1% SDS at 42°C and exposed. Between hybridizations, the probes
were stripped from the blots by shaking gently 4x5 minutes in boiling
0.01x SSC, 0.01% SDS. Complete removal of the probe was confirmed by
autoradiography. After measurements of mRNA levels, it
was confirmed that equal amounts of RNA had been blotted by
hybridization of the blots to a cDNA specific for cytosolic 28 S rRNA.
Autoradiographs of the slot blots were scanned densitometrically, and
tissue levels of mRNAs were expressed as arbitrary densitometric units
per 28 S densitometric units, with care taken that the signal was in
the linear range for all measurements.
The amounts of total RNA per unit mass of left ventricular tissue were determined by a quantitative extraction procedure in which the orcinol reaction was used to measure RNA content.21
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the use of
GRAPH-PAD PRISM software. All data obtained for each experimental
variable were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA to determine whether
treatment had any overall significant effects. If significance was
detected, differences between groups were analyzed for each
experimental day by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test.
Statistical comparisons of the results obtained for left
ventricular weight to body weight ratios and total left
ventricular RNA levels at day 10, which were combined from
both experimental series, were made by the 2-tailed, unpaired
Student's t test. All data are expressed as mean±SEM. A
value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Plasma Renin Activity
PRA rapidly increased in all animals with renal artery clipping
(Figure 2). In saline-treated animals,
PRA was elevated 3- to 4-fold by day 2 after clipping of the renal
artery and then further increased to levels
7-fold higher than in
sham-operated animals by day 10. ETA receptor
blockade did not significantly alter the activation of the circulating
renin-angiotensin system by renal artery stenosis,
even though PRA tended to be higher on day 10 than in saline-infused
clipped rats (48±9 versus 34±8 ng Ang I per milliliter per hour;
P=0.3; Figure 2). In sham-operated animals,
ETA receptor blockade had no effect on PRA.
|
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Left ventricular weight and the ratio of left
ventricular weight to body weight were significantly
increased by 5% and 13%, respectively, as early as 2 days after renal
artery clipping in saline-treated animals (Figure 3; Table 1). No additional
stimulation of cardiac growth was found on day 4, but between day 4 and
day 10 the ratio of left ventricular weight to body weight
further increased to a level 39% higher than that of sham-operated
controls. The same degree of left ventricular
hypertrophy was also observed in series 2 after 10 days of
2-kidney, 1 clip hypertension (Table 2).
The early induction of left ventricular
hypertrophy after renal artery stenosis was
entirely blocked by ETA receptor blockade (Figure 3). By days 4 and 10, cardiac hypertrophy developed
despite continuous ETA receptor blockade but
remained significantly attenuated on day 10 (Figures 3 and 4A). The inhibitory
effect of ETA receptor blockade on left
ventricular growth was very similar in series 1 (-51%;
Table 1) and in series 2 (-49%; Table 2), indicating a
consistent influence of ETA
receptormediated effects on myocardial growth.
|
|
ß-MHC and ANP Gene Expression
Levels of mRNAs for ß-MHC and ANP (normalized to 28 S rRNA) were
significantly elevated after renal artery clipping in saline-treated
animals compared with sham-operated controls (Figure 5). The activation of both genes occurred
early (day 2), and mRNA levels remained relatively constant until day
10, with 1.8- to 2.8-fold increases for ß-MHC mRNA and 1.7- to
2.7-fold increases for ANP mRNA. ETA receptor
blockade completely prevented the activation of ß-MHC and ANP gene
expression on day 2 (Figure 5). On days 4 and 10, however, both
genes were activated by renal artery stenosis to
approximately the same degree as in saline-treated animals (1.6- to
3.2-fold increases for ß-MHC mRNA, 1.9- to 2.9-fold increases for ANP
mRNA; Figure 5) despite continued ETA
receptor blockade and a significantly diminished hypertrophic response
(Figures 3 and 5; see also Figure 4). In all
sham-operated groups, the ratio of ß-MHC mRNA to 28 S rRNA and ANP
mRNA to 28 S rRNA decreased considerably (50% to 60%) between day 2
and day 4.
|
Total RNA levels increased in parallel with myocardial hypertrophy and were 1.4-fold higher on day 2 and 1.7-fold higher on day 10 after renal artery clipping in saline-treated animals compared with sham-operated controls. In contrast to the expression of ß-MHC and ANP mRNAs, ETA receptor blockade significantly blunted this increase by 30% on day 10 (Figure 4B).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neither the changes in blood pressure nor the increases in PRA after renal artery stenosis were significantly altered by ETA receptor blockade. This suggests that the inhibitory influences of the ETA receptor antagonist on left ventricular hypertrophy and gene expression were mediated by a direct effect on cardiomyocytes and were not secondary to blood pressure effects or an inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. The development of renovascular hypertension was also found to be unaffected by chronic blockade of both ETA and ETB receptors with the nonselective ET antagonist bosentan.26 In contrast, when Ang II was administered exogenously, chronic ETA receptor blockade nearly completely prevented the increases in blood pressure.27 28 The reason for these different responses to endogenous or exogenous Ang II elevation is not clear but may be related to different kinetics of elevation of circulating Ang II or to additional mechanisms activated by renal artery stenosis. Similar to the present study, combined ETA/ETB receptor blockade did not alter the stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system after renal artery stenosis,29 indicating that chronic endothelin receptor blockade has no major effect on the renin-angiotensin system. In contrast, exogenous administration of ET-1 acutely inhibits renin release in rats in vivo30 and in vitro,31 and renal ischemia rapidly increases renal ET-1 mRNA levels.32 Furthermore, we have recently observed a potentiation of pressure-dependent renin release after acute ETA receptor blockade in conscious dogs (H. Berthold et al, unpublished data, 1998). Accordingly, compensatory mechanisms may restore the normal activity of the renin-angiotensin system during chronic endothelin receptor antagonism.
The development of left ventricular hypertrophy remained markedly blunted during ETA receptor blockade by day 10, whereas the expression of the ß-MHC and ANP genes, which is high in the fetal ventricle and becomes repressed during postnatal development, was only transiently affected after renal artery stenosis. In previous studies on the role of ET-1 in pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy, alterations of the hypertrophic responses induced by ET receptor antagonists were always found to be paralleled by similar changes in fetal gene expression.23 33 34 The present results suggest that the intracellular signal transduction pathways that mediate the phenotypic changes of cardiac hypertrophy may be differentially modulated by endogenous ET-1. In vitro studies have demonstrated that Ang II activates independent intracellular signaling pathways to induce an overall stimulation of protein synthesis or more specific changes in myocardial gene expression.35 The upregulation of ANP and ß-MHC gene expression is mediated by an Raf-1 and MAP kinasedependent pathway.36 Activation of this signaling cascade by Ang II has been recently shown to be strongly potentiated by ET-1.7 On the other hand, cardiac hypertrophy results from an accelerated rate of overall protein synthesis, which requires an increase of de novo ribosome biogenesis.37 ET-1 has been shown to increase the transcription rate of rDNA through phosphorylation of an rDNA transcription factor, the upstream binding factor.38 Since the transcription of rDNA constitutes the rate-limiting step for ribosome biogenesis in cardiac myocytes, under certain conditions a continuous stimulation by ET-1 may be required to induce the maximal growth response. Consistent with this notion, in the present study total left ventricular RNA levels, which provide an estimate of myocardial rRNA levels, were significantly lower in clipped rats subjected to ETA receptor blockade than in saline-treated controls.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the endothelin system participates in the phenotypic alterations of the left ventricular myocardium during the early phase of renovascular hypertension. Similar observations of a growth-promoting role of endogenous ET-1 have been reported recently for pressure overloadinduced33 34 and norepinephrine-induced23 left ventricular hypertrophy. Together with these findings, the present observations indicate that activation of myocardial ETA receptors is a common signaling pathway that is stimulated independently by different primary growth-promoting stimulimechanical load, catecholamines, and Ang IIduring the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 29, 1998; first decision December 1, 1998; accepted December 8, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Tamamori M, Ito H, Adachi S, Akimoto H, Marumo F, Hiroe M. Endothelin-3 induces hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes by the endogenous endothelin-1-mediated mechanism. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:366372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Shubeita HE, McDonough PM, Harris AN, Knowlton KU,
Glembotski CC, Brown JH, Chien KR. Endothelin induction of inositol
phospholipid hydrolysis, sarcomere assembly, and cardiac gene
expression in ventricular hypertrophy.
J Biol Chem. 1990;265:2055520562.
4.
Ito H, Hirata Y, Hiroe M, Tsujino M, Adachi S,
Takamoto T, Nitta M, Taniguchi K, Marumo F. Endothelin-1 induces
hypertrophy with enhanced expression of muscle-specific
genes in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circ
Res. 1991;69:209215.
5. Sadoshima J, Xu Y, Slayter HS, Izumo S. Autocrine release of angiotensin II mediates stretch-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes in vitro. Cell. 1993;75:977984.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Booz GW, Baker KM. Role of type 1 and type 2
angiotensin receptors in angiotensin
IIinduced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
Hypertension. 1996;28:635640.
7. Yamazaki T, Komuro I, Kudho S, Zou Y, Shiojima I, Hiroi Y, Mizuno T, Maemura K, Kurihara H, Aikawa R, Takano H, Yazaki Y. Endothelin-1 is involved in mechanical stress-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:33213328.
8.
Mercadier JJ, Samuel JL, Michel JB, Zongazo MA, de la
Bastie D, Lompre AM, Wisnewsky C, Rappaport L, Levy B, Schwartz K.
Atrial natriuretic factor gene expression in rat ventricle
during experimental hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H979H987.
9.
Wiesner RJ, Ehmke H, Faulhaber J, Zak R, Rüegg
JC. Dissociation of left ventricular
hypertrophy, ß-myosin heavy chain gene expression,
and myosin isoform switch in rats after ascending aortic
stenosis. Circulation. 1997;95:12531259.
10.
Kim S, Ohta K, Hamaguchi A, Yukimura T, Miura K, Iwao
H. Angiotensin II induces cardiac phenotypic modulation and
remodeling in vivo in rats. Hypertension. 1995;25:12521259.
11.
Sosic D, Nunez E, Frohlich ED, Prakash O.
Angiotensin II increases left ventricular mass
without affecting myosin isoform mRNAs. Hypertension. 1996;28:265268.
12. Hilal-Dandan R, Merck DT, Lujan JP, Brunton LL. Coupling of the type A endothelin receptor to multiple responses in adult rat cardiac myocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;45:11831190.[Abstract]
13.
Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Sakurai T, Kasuya Y, Ihara M,
Yamaguchi I, Goto K, Sugishita Y. Endogenous endothelin-1
participates in the maintenance of cardiac function in rats
with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1996;93:12141222.
14. Raschack M, Unger L, Riechers H, Klinge D. Receptor selectivity of endothelin antagonists and prevention of vasoconstriction and endothelin-induced sudden death. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl 3):S397S399.
15. Riechers H, Albrecht HP, Amberg W, Baumann E, Bernard H, Böhm HJ, Klinge D, Kling A, Müller S, Raschack M, Unger L, Walker N, Wernet W. Discovery and optimization of a novel class of orally active nonpeptidic endothelin-A receptor antagonists. J Med Chem. 1996;39:21232128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Smith SH, Bishop SP. Selection criteria for
drug-treated animals in two-kidney, one clip renal hypertension.
Hypertension. 1986;8:700705.
17.
Orth SR, Esslinger JP, Amann K, Schwarz U, Raschack M,
Ritz E. Nephroprotection of an ETA-receptor
blocker (LU 135252) in salt-loaded uninephrectomized stroke-prone
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1998;31:9951001.
18. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Schiaffino S, Samuel JL, Sassoon D, Lompre AM, Garner
I, Marotte F, Buckingham M, Rappaport L, Schwartz K. Nonsynchronous
accumulation of
-skeletal actin and ß-myosin
heavy chain mRNAs during early stages of pressure-overload-induced
cardiac hypertrophy demonstrated by in situ hybridization.
Circ Res. 1989;64:937948.
20. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 1989.
21. Schneider WC. Determination of nucleic acids in tissues by pentose analysis. Methods Enzymol. 1957;3:680684.
22. Katholi RE. Renal nerves in the pathogenesis of hypertension in experimental animals and humans. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:F1F14.
23.
Kaddoura S, Firth JD, Boheler KR, Sugden PH,
Poole-Wilson PA. Endothelin-1 is involved in
norepinephrine-induced ventricular
hypertrophy in vivo. Circulation. 1996;93:20682079.
24.
Schlüter KD, Piper HM. Trophic effects of
catecholamines and parathyroid hormone on adult
ventricular cardiomyocytes. Am J
Physiol. 1992;263:H1739H1746.
25.
Decker RS, Cook MG, Behnke-Barclay MM, Decker ML, Lesch
M, Samarel AM. Catecholamines modulate protein turnover in
cultured, quiescent rabbit cardiac myocytes. Am J
Physiol. 1993;265:H329H339.
26.
Li JS, Knafo L, Turgeon A, Garcia R, Schiffrin EL.
Effect of endothelin antagonism on blood pressure and vascular
structure in renovascular hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H88H93.
27. d'Uscio LV, Moreau P, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M, Lüscher TF. Effects of chronic ETA-receptor blockade in angiotensin IIinduced hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;29(pt 2):435441.
28. Rajagopalan S, Laursen JB, Borthayre A, Kurz S, Keiser J, Haleen S, Giaid A, Harrison DG. Role for endothelin-1 in angiotensin IImediated hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;20(pt 1):2934.
29.
Schricker K, Scholz H, Hamann M, Clozel M, Krämer
BK, Kurtz A. Role of endogenous endothelins in the renin
system of normal and two-kidney, one clip rats.
Hypertension. 1995;25:10251029.
30. Matsumura Y, Hisaki K, Ohyama T, Hayashi K, Morimoto S. Effects of endothelin on renal function and renin secretion in anesthetized rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;166:577580.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Rakugi H, Nakamura M, Saito H, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Endothelin inhibits renin release from isolated rat glomeruli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;157:11641168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Firth JD, Ratcliffe PJ. Organ distribution of the three rat endothelin messenger RNAs and the effects of ischemia on renal gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:10231031.
33.
Ito H, Hiroe M, Hirata Y, Fujisaki H, Adachi S, Akimoto
H, Ohta Y, Marumo F. Endothelin ETA receptor
antagonist blocks cardiac hypertrophy provoked
by hemodynamic overload. Circulation. 1994;89:21982203.
34. Ichikawa K, Hidai C, Okuda C, Kimata S, Matsuoka R, Hosoda S, Quertermous T, Kawana M. Endogenous endothelin-1 mediates cardiac hypertrophy and switching of myosin heavy chain gene expression in rat ventricular myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:12861291.[Abstract]
35.
Sadoshima J, Izumo S. Rapamycin selectively inhibits
angiotensin IIinduced increase in protein synthesis in
cardiac myocytes in vitro: potential role of 70-kD S6 kinase in
angiotensin IIinduced cardiac hypertrophy.
Circ Res. 1995;77:10401052.
36.
Thorburn J, McMahon M, Thorburn A. Raf-1 kinase
activity is necessary and sufficient for gene expression changes but
not sufficient for cellular morphology changes associated with cardiac
myocyte hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:3058030586.
37.
Morgan HE, Baker KM. Cardiac hypertrophy:
mechanical, neural, and endocrine dependence. Circulation. 1991;83:1325.
38.
Luyken J, Hannan RD, Cheung JY, Rothblum LI. Regulation
of rDNA transcription during endothelin-1induced
hypertrophy of neonatal cardiomyocytes:
hyperphosphorylation of upstream binding factor, an
rDNA transcription factor. Circ Res. 1996;78:354361.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Dworkin and C. J. Cooper Renal-Artery Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., November 12, 2009; 361(20): 1972 - 1978. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J Epstein Efficacy and Safety of Darusentan: A Novel Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2008; 42(7): 1060 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Cooper and T. P. Murphy The Case for Renal Artery Stenting for Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 263 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Dworkin Controversial Treatment of Atherosclerotic Renal Vascular Disease: The Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions Trial Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 350 - 356. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Lund, S. L. Peterson, G. S. Timmins, and M. K. Walker Endothelin-1-Mediated Increase in Reactive Oxygen Species and NADPH Oxidase Activity in Hearts of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Null Mice Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2005; 88(1): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Rossi, C. Ganzaroli, M. Cesari, A. Maresca, M. Plebani, G. G. Nussdorfer, and A. C. Pessina Endothelin receptor blockade lowers plasma aldosterone levels via different mechanisms in primary aldosteronism and high-to-normal renin hypertension Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Groenning, J. C. Nilsson, L. Sondergaard, A. Kjaer, H. B.W. Larsson, and P. R. Hildebrandt Evaluation of impaired left ventricular ejection fraction and increased dimensions by multiple neurohumoral plasma concentrations Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2001; 3(6): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Spieker, G. Noll, F. T. Ruschitzka, and T. F. Luscher Endothelin receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure: a new therapeutic principle for the future? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1493 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Bianciotti and A. J. de Bold Modulation of cardiac natriuretic peptide gene expression following endothelin type A receptor blockade in renovascular hypertension Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2001; 49(4): 808 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bohlender, S. Gerbaulet, J. Kramer, M. Gross, M. Kirchengast, and R. Dietz Synergistic Effects of AT1 and ETA Receptor Blockade in a Transgenic, Angiotensin II-Dependent, Rat Model Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 992 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-E. Massart, J. Donckier, J. Kyselovic, T. Godfraind, G. R. Heyndrickx, and M. Wibo Carvedilol and Lacidipine Prevent Cardiac Hypertrophy and Endothelin-1 Gene Overexpression After Aortic Banding Hypertension, December 1, 1999; 34(6): 1197 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Rossi, M. Cesari, A. C. Pessina, B. Hocher, and I. George Endothelins and Cardiac Fibrosis • Response Hypertension, November 1, 1999; e1(5): . [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Moser, J. Faulhaber, R. J. Wiesner, and H. Ehmke Predominant activation of endothelin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by norepinephrine in rat left ventricle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1389 - R1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |