(Hypertension. 1999;34:388-394.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (C.F.); and Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Service d'Hypertension Arterielle, Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France (X.J.).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: renin sodium angiotensin II aldosterone posture blacks
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Far less is known about the determinants of sodium homeostasis in this patient population. Among the important roles played by the renin-angiotensin system is control of adrenal aldosterone release. Sodium intake modifies adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin II (Ang II). Aldosterone release is maintained at a low level when subjects consume diets high in sodium but is significantly enhanced on a restricted sodium intake, thus augmenting ultimate sodium retention. We had been led to believe that LREH patients maintain normal basal plasma levels of aldosterone in the face of a suppressed renin system via excessive responsiveness to Ang II, at least on an ad libitum sodium intake. Early studies favored this thesis,2 3 4 5 6 with some suggestion of heterogeneity of response,7 although each included only small numbers of patients.
In an earlier study on regulation of aldosterone secretion in hypertensives analyzed by race and not by renin status, we made an unanticipated observation.8 Adrenal sensitivity to Ang II in low-renin hypertensives, both black and white, showed the same blunting of adrenal responsiveness compared with normal subjects and with normal-renin hypertensives. That study focused on measurements performed when the patients were in balance on a restricted sodium intake, and the low-renin sample size was small. The present study was undertaken to resolve these differences by examining several possible hypotheses, each related to a change in the normal relationship between sodium intake and aldosterone response to Ang II. The first hypothesis predicts that the entire relationship between adrenal responsiveness and concentration of Ang II is shifted upward in LREH, rendering these patients hyperresponsive on both high- and low-salt intakes. However, our earlier study refuted this possibility. The second hypothesis is that sodium intake has very little influence on adrenal responsiveness to Ang II in LREH, with responsiveness fixed at a level that translates into a state of normal or high responsiveness in a high-salt state but suppressed responsiveness on a low-salt diet. In addition, the LREH population may be heterogeneous in its response. We tested the hypothesis that shifts in sodium intake, already known to influence adrenal responsiveness, would explain some of the heterogeneity that has been described by examining adrenal responsiveness to changes in sodium intake and to Ang II infusion in a large group of white and black patients with LREH.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients were studied at 3 collaborating centers: Boston,
Massachusetts; Rome, Italy; and Paris, France. Similar protocols were
approved by the Human Subjects Committees at each site, and informed
written consent was obtained from each subject. All subjects were free
of cardiovascular and overt renal disease, except for
blood pressure elevation in the hypertensive subjects, whose untreated
seated blood pressures were >90 mm Hg diastolic and
140 mm Hg systolic, measured manually with a standard
mercury sphygmomanometer on
2 visits. All subjects were screened with
a physical examination; laboratory tests, including serum electrolytes,
liver function tests, and complete blood count; and ECG. Subjects with
known or suspected secondary hypertension or with renal insufficiency
(creatinine clearance <70 mL/min) were excluded from the
study. All antihypertensive medications were discontinued at least 2
weeks before study. Diabetes mellitus type II was diagnosed either by
fasting blood glucose >140 mg/dL or because of ongoing treatment with
insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents.
Protocols
On admission to the metabolic ward, each subject was
placed on a constant isocaloric diet including 10 mmol sodium and
100 mmol potassium, with 2000 mL/d water. Some subjects began
their low-sodium diet as outpatients. From the time of admission, daily
24-hour urine collections were obtained for measurement of sodium,
potassium, and creatinine. After 5 to 7 days, when external
sodium balance had been achieved (urinary sodium equaling dietary
sodium), upright posture studies and Ang II infusions were performed on
separate days. Hormonal responses to a postural stimulus were assessed
in each subject after 1 or 2 hours in the standing position for the
measurement of plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone
concentration.
While remaining in low-salt balance, on a separate study day each patient received an infusion of Ang II amide (CIBA-Geigy) at 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1 for 40 minutes, delivered by an infusion pump (Baxter Corp). This dose has been found to stimulate aldosterone release with minimal pressor effects. Each study began at 8:00 AM, after the subjects had been fasting and recumbent overnight. During the infusion, blood pressure was monitored every 2 minutes with an indirect recording sphygmomanometer. PRA and aldosterone were measured in all patients at the beginning and end of the Ang II infusion. In a subset of patients, Ang II infusions were also performed after 3 to 4 days of high-salt intake (200 mmol Na+).
Laboratory Procedures
Blood samples were collected on ice and spun immediately, and
the plasma was frozen until the time of assay. Serum and urine sodium
and potassium levels were measured by flame photometry, with lithium as
an internal standard. Serum and urine creatinine were
measured by an autoanalyzer technique. PRA and
aldosterone were assayed by radioimmunoassay techniques
previously described.9 10 11 Sodium-lithium countertransport
was measured as the sodium-dependent lithium efflux, as recently
described.12
Group Definitions
All hypertensive patients were classified by upright-posture PRA
value as either low-renin or normal/high-renin. LREH was defined by
conventional criteria, with subjects in low-salt balance; PRA was
measured after upright posture of 1 to 2 hours'
duration.8 11 Normal/high-renin hypertensives were further
classified as modulators or nonmodulators (NMs) on the basis of formal
analyses that have demonstrated NMs to be a distinct subgroup
of essential hypertension.13 NMs are patients in whom
sodium intake fails to modify the responsiveness of the renal
vasculature and the adrenal gland to Ang II. Specific abnormalities
defined in this subset include failure of sodium loading to increase
basal renal blood flow or to enhance the renal vascular response to Ang
II and failure of sodium restriction to enhance adrenal responsiveness
to Ang II. Normal-renin patients were categorized by their increment in
plasma aldosterone after infusion of Ang II in low-salt
balance, a parameter shown to fit a bimodal distribution in
the general hypertensive population, with modulators having a rise in
aldosterone similar to that of normotensive subjects and
NMs having a much smaller increase (defined as <416 pmol/L; <15
ng/dL). Some of these patients have been reported in previous
publications.14 Potential subjects who had a second
measure of NM assessed, namely the fall in renal plasma flow with Ang
II on a high-salt intake, were excluded if the indices were
discordant.
Statistical Analyses
Descriptive statistics by group are presented as
mean±SEM or as percentage. The 4 study groups were compared by ANCOVA,
with age as a covariate. Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure was
used to test the pairwise differences between LREH and each of the 3
other groups. The Dunnett procedure is applicable to this set of 3
a priori nonorthogonal comparisons in which the correlation
between each pair of contrasts is 0.5.15 The
experiment-wide probability of incorrectly rejecting the null
hypothesis was limited to 0.05. Within subject groups, t
tests were used to compare observed subgroups (by race, gender, age,
and diabetes). Pearson correlations were used to test associations
between continuous variables. The assumptions underlying the
statistical tests were satisfied by the raw data, except for the ratio
of aldosterone to PRA, for which the natural logarithmic
transformation was applied to achieve normality before
analysis. Data analyses were performed with the SAS
system.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Adrenal Responses
High-salt Ang II infusions were performed in 29 patients with
LREH. Reflecting overall suppression of the
renin-angiotensin system, these patients had low
concentrations of aldosterone at baseline (166±19 pmol/L;
6.0±0.7 ng/dL), which were essentially identical to those of the other
groups (Figure 1). With Ang II
stimulation, patients with LREH again had responses that did not differ
significantly from any other group [aldosterone increment
of 305±58 versus 388±55 pmol/L (10.7±2.1 versus 14.1±2.4 ng/dL) in
patients with intact modulation, 194±55 pmol/L (7±2 ng/dL) in NMs,
and 250±111 pmol/L (8±4 ng/dL) in normotensives]. However, when the
renin-angiotensin system was stimulated with a low-sodium
diet, patients with LREH demonstrated the least augmentation of basal
aldosterone secretion, with an increment of only 222±28
pmol/L (8±1 ng/dL), compared with 361±55 pmol/L (13±2 ng/dL) in the
modulators (P=NS), 472±111 pmol/L (17±4 ng/dL) in the NMs
(P<0.05), and 499±28 pmol/L (18±2 ng/dL) in the normal
subjects (P=0.01). Basal aldosterone
concentration on a low-sodium diet was statistically lower among LREH
than either modulating hypertensives or normotensives
(P=0.001) but not statistically different from NMs.
|
Peak adrenal Ang II responsiveness on a low-sodium intake was also low in LREH (Figure 1). As anticipated, the increment in serum aldosterone concentration on a low-salt diet was smallest among the NMs, by definition (180±17 pmol/L; 6.5±0.6 ng/dL). Patients with LREH had a larger response (613±39 pmol/L; 22.1±1.5 ng/dL; P=0.001), but one significantly lower than that seen in either the modulators (940±53 pmol/L; 33.9±1.9 ng/dL; P=0.001) or the normotensives (804±50 pmol/L; 29±1.8 ng/dL; P<0.05); Figure 1. In response to the stimulus of upright posture, the rise in aldosterone was significantly smaller among both the low-renin patients (644±78 pmol/L; 23.2±2.8 ng/dL) and NMs (752±91 pmol/L; 27.1±3.3 ng/dL) compared with modulators (1576±169 pmol/L; 56.8±6.1 ng/dL; P=0.001) and normotensives (1620±194 pmol/L; 58.4±7 ng/dL; P=0.01) (Figure 2).
|
For NaLi CTT, the pattern of results is similar to that of aldosterone release. The highest values were found in NMs, followed by LREH patients, whose values were significantly higher than in normal subjects (P=0.01; Table 1).
Analyses Within LREH Patients
Adrenal responsiveness was analyzed within the group of
LREH patients to explore heterogeneity of responses.
Because of our previous reports of a blunted adrenal
aldosterone release in hypertensive blacks,8
we analyzed the data within LREH according to race. The
analysis was restricted to the Boston and Paris sets, because
no blacks were studied in Rome.
For white subjects, in the subset studied in the condition of a suppressed renin- angiotensin system, namely on a high-salt diet, there was no significant difference in either basal or Ang IIstimulated PRA between LREH patients and any other group (Table 2, top). Similarly, black low-renin hypertensives had high-salt PRA values that were very similar to those of NMs and normotensives. Because this is a subset analysis, the observations within certain samples are few (Table 2, bottom). With the stimulation of a low-salt diet, both black and white LREH patients had PRA responses that were significantly smaller than in any other group. The ratio of basal aldosterone to PRA in low-salt balance was higher among LREH than any other group among both whites (P=0.001) and blacks (P=0.01) The PRA response to posture among patients with LREH was no higher than the supine value, in contrast to every other group.
|
Among white patients, the mean aldosterone increment among LREH (533±58 pmol/L; 19.2±2 ng/dL), although higher than among NMs (175±25 pmol/L; 6.3±0.9 ng/dL; P=0.01), was still significantly lower than the modulator response (993±69 pmol/L; 35.8±2.5 ng/dL; P=0.001). Among the 44 hypertensive blacks, as expected by classification, NMs had the lowest responses (194±139 pmol/L; 7±1.6 ng/dL). Aldosterone release among LREH patients was lower than among the modulators (388±50 versus 699±69 pmol/L; 14±1.8 versus 25.2±2.5 ng/dL), although the difference did not reach significance. As anticipated, black modulators showed responses that were lower than in their white counterparts (P=0.006). Even within the LREH, however, there was a smaller response in blacks (388±50 versus 610±47 pmol/L; 14±1.8 versus 22±1.7 ng/dL; P=0.0006). There was no significant difference in urinary potassium excretion between whites and blacks of either the low-renin or NM subsets. Normotensive blacks and whites showed no statistically significant difference in their responsiveness (624±139 versus 818±55 pmol/L; 22.5±5 versus 29.5±2 ng/dL).
Gender also contributed to variation in adrenal responsiveness, with the low-salt aldosterone response to Ang II among low-renin women trending higher than in men [746±94 versus 549±42 pmol/L (26.9±3.4 versus 19.8±1.5 ng/dL); t test, P=0.07]. The low-renin state was found in 23% of women <45 years old; this was similar to the frequency found in young men (21%).
The increased frequency of LREH with increasing age was significant in both men and women (P=0.001 and P=0.007). Within the low-renin group, however, there was no correlation between age and low-salt aldosterone response (P=0.8). This finding is in contrast to the significant negative correlations within both the modulating hypertensives (r=-0.26, P=0.003) and the normotensives (r=-0.18, P=0.04).
Diabetes mellitus had no significant impact on aldosterone responsiveness to Ang II in low-salt balance. Nondiabetic LREH patients had an aldosterone increment that was very similar to that in diabetics [619±50 versus 560±55 pmol/L (22±2 versus 20±2 ng/dL)].
Blood Pressure Responses
Salt sensitivity was assessed by the difference in
systolic and diastolic blood pressures on changing
from high- to low-salt diet. LREH is widely recognized to be a
salt-sensitive form of hypertension, which was confirmed in this study
(Figure 3). In the normal subjects,
diastolic blood pressure changed by only 1.0±1.5
mm Hg, in contrast to an LREH response of 11.7±1.3;
P=0.001. Similarly, the change in systolic blood
pressure was significantly less in the normal subjects than in
low-renin patients (P=0.01). The NMs showed a blood pressure
sensitivity to change in salt intake that was essentially identical to
the low-renin patients.
|
Finally, as anticipated and in contrast to aldosterone release, the rise in systolic blood pressure with Ang II infusion on a low-salt diet was greatest among the low-renin patients (26±3 mm Hg). This response was significantly larger than in not only the normal subjects (7±1 mm Hg) but also both the modulating and the NM hypertensives (15±1 and 15±2 mm Hg; P<0.01). The rise in diastolic blood pressure also was greater than the normal (P<0.001) and NM (P<0.05) responses. Patients with LREH did not differ from normal subjects in their blood pressure response to Ang II on a high-salt diet.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Basal plasma aldosterone concentration and its response to Ang II were essentially normal in all of the hypertensives, including the low-renin subset, when studies were performed on a high-salt diet. When the system was stressed by restriction of salt intake, however, a series of abnormalities emerged in low-renin patients. Despite a high aldosterone/PRA activity ratio among patients with LREH, there was, in general, no heightened sensitivity of the adrenal gland to exogenous Ang II on either a liberal or restricted sodium intake, thus countering a widely held view of LREH.
Low-renin subsets in previous detailed physiological studies were substantially smaller. In addition, protocol differences may account for part of the discrepancy. Wisgerhof and Brown2 reported an increased adrenal sensitivity to Ang II. In that classic study, Ang II was infused on a 155-mmol-sodium diet in 6 white patients with LREH. Furthermore, renin profiling was performed after short-term Lasix dosing rather than sustained low-salt balance. The study by Marks et al3 was also performed after several days on a high-sodium diet. We found no difference in basal or stimulated aldosterone concentration on the high-salt diet among all 3 groups of hypertensives studied. In addition, these early studies may have included patients with mild primary hyperaldosteronism caused by bilateral zona glomerulosa hyperplasia, with a high aldosterone-to-renin ratio. This diagnosis may have been difficult to confirm in the era when the studies were performed.
The data in our study confirm heterogeneity of response among LREH. One of the main identifiable determinants of response was race. We have previously reported a significant blunting of the adrenal response to Ang II in normal-renin blacks.8 This difference could not readily be attributed to weaker stimuli for aldosterone secretion: Ang II was administered at equal doses, mean cortisol concentrations decreased over the course of the infusions in both races, and there was no difference in either serum or urinary potassium. The present analysis identified a smaller response even among blacks with LREH compared with low-renin whites, thus supporting a preliminary observation that began to emerge from our earlier studies. Normotensive blacks and whites were not statistically different in response, but a trend visible in this still relatively small sample indicates the need for further study. Indeed, in a large cross-sectional study, a 40% lower aldosterone excretion rate was reported in black children than in whites.16
Race was not responsible for the overall findings in this study, however: even with blacks excluded, no heightened adrenal response was found among white patients with LREH. A second factor contributing to adrenal responsiveness is gender, with female responses trending higher among low-renin hypertensives. We have reported greater adrenal sensitivity to Ang II among women compared with men, but only until the age of menopause.17 Mechanisms underlying this sexual dimorphism in essential hypertension have been postulated in detail. Estrogen is a likely contributor, possibly via its effects on angiotensinogen transcription or through other modifying roles it plays in the renin-angiotensin system. We have speculated that female sex hormones allow an override of genotypic predisposition to the NM phenotype. Our current data dispel the previously reported increased frequency of LREH among premenopausal women, classified by random renin profiling rather than under rigorous salt-restricted conditions.18
The fall in renin release with age is well accepted; studies have confirmed a diminution of aldosterone secretion in the basal state.19 We have previously reported an increasing frequency of adrenal unresponsiveness with age among normal renin hypertensives,17 confirmed again in this study, which, however, revealed no association of age and aldosterone responsiveness within the group of LREH. This contrast is probably explained by the older age of the low-renin hypertensives studied. However, age did not contribute significantly to the overall findings; controlling for age in the ANCOVA did not affect our findings regarding either adrenal or pressor responsiveness in LREH compared with all other groups.
One unanticipated finding was the lack of excessive LREH among patients with diabetes mellitus. Historically, diabetes mellitus has been considered a low-renin state.20 21 22 The stage of disease and extent of renal involvement may underlie the variable responses. Patients in most earlier reports that found the low-renin state to be more frequent in diabetics often had longstanding disease, severe hypertension, and nephropathy. The subjects in this study were without overt proteinuria; most had mild to moderate hypertension, and in many, the duration of diabetes was brief.
Although hormonal responses were lower than normal in LREH, pressor responsiveness was heightened on the low-salt diet. Whereas 1 early report in 8 patients with LREH failed to demonstrate an increased pressor response to Ang II,23 it has been shown repeatedly that in hypertension marked by sodium retention, like primary aldosteronism, there is a heightened sensitivity of the vasculature to Ang II,24 25 attributed to upregulation of vascular Ang II receptors. A positive correlation between plasma renin activity and pressor dose of Ang II within essential hypertension has been reported.26 27 In addition, it is well established that the pressor response to Ang II is enhanced on a high salt intake in essential hypertensives and in healthy subjects, with suppression of endogenous Ang II concentration.28 29
Salt-sensitivity of LREH has been one of the most salient clinical features described,30 31 and it was reported again in this analysis, as measured by rise in blood pressure of >10 mm Hg when changing from a high to a low sodium intake. Of significance, nonmodulating hypertensives demonstrated a salt-sensitivity equivalent to that of low-renin hypertensives. The similarity in salt sensitivity exposes 1 of several similarities between these patient groups. Both groups showed an elevated NaLi CTT measure, although not to the same degree, confirming our earlier reports of an elevated NaLi CTT in essential hypertension.32 In addition, each had subnormal peak aldosterone response to Ang II infusion on a low-salt diet.
A comparison and contrast of adrenal responsiveness in LREH patients and NMs is mechanistically revealing. Both groups have low basal aldosterone concentration on a low-salt diet. However, their response characteristics differed once the system became engaged: the slope of response in LREH paralleled the normal, whereas that of the NMs was clearly blunted. In the case of the kidney and the peripheral vasculature, normal Ang II responses are augmented on a high-salt diet because of receptor upregulation. For the adrenal, the scenario is more complex: enhanced adrenal responsiveness to Ang II on a low-salt diet is due not to receptor upregulation but rather to augmentation of an event further downstream, eg, aldosterone synthase activity.33 The normal response to infusion of Ang II in a low-salt state should be enhancedie, follow a steeper slope. Neither the LREH nor the NM responses, therefore, can be attributed simply to a diminished signal. In NMs, a blunted aldosterone response even with infusion of Ang II suggests an abnormality in synthesis. One possibility raised by this study is that PRA plays a role in normal modulation but via an action not understood and not through the formation of Ang II.
In the case of LREH, conversely, the parallel slope suggests an abnormality in Ang II receptor number or affinity. Genetic linkage studies on the angiotensin AT1 receptor in essential hypertension have thus far been unrevealing in the entire group of essential hypertension.34 Within the low-renin subgroup, however, it may be that an AT1 receptor abnormality will be uncovered. Such an abnormality might account for both the reduced adrenal response and the heightened pressor response. These mechanistic conclusions are necessarily speculative. Continued hormonal and genetic testing may eventually uncover the mechanisms responsible for maintenance of the low-renin state.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 3, 1999; first decision March 10, 1999; accepted April 14, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Pojoga, N. S. Kolatkar, J. S. Williams, T. S. Perlstein, X. Jeunemaitre, N. J. Brown, P. N. Hopkins, B. A. Raby, and G. H. Williams {beta}-2 Adrenergic Receptor Diplotype Defines a Subset of Salt-Sensitive Hypertension Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 892 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Szmuilowicz, G. K. Adler, J. S. Williams, D. E. Green, T. M. Yao, P. N. Hopkins, and E. W. Seely Relationship between Aldosterone and Progesterone in the Human Menstrual Cycle J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3981 - 3987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Freel and J. M.C. Connell Mechanisms of Hypertension: The Expanding Role of Aldosterone J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1993 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Stolarz, J. A. Staessen, K. Kawecka-Jaszcz, E. Brand, G. Bianchi, T. Kuznetsova, V. Tikhonoff, L. Thijs, T. Reineke, S. Babeanu, et al. Genetic Variation in CYP11B2 and AT1R Influences Heart Rate Variability Conditional on Sodium Excretion Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Slim, F. Torremocha, T. Moreau, A. Pizard, S. C. Hunt, A. Vuagnat, G. H. Williams, F. Gauthier, X. Jeunemaitre, and F. Alhenc-Gelas Loss-of-Function Polymorphism of the Human Kallikrein Gene with Reduced Urinary Kallikrein Activity J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 968 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D.L. Fisher, S. Hurwitz, X. Jeunemaitre, P. N. Hopkins, N. K. Hollenberg, and G. H. Williams Familial Aggregation of Low-Renin Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2002; 39(4): 914 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Shi, H. T. Nguyen, G. D. Sharma, L. G. Navar, and K. N. Pandey Genetic disruption of atrial natriuretic peptide receptor-A alters renin and angiotensin II levels Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F665 - F673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Foo, K M O'Shaughnessy, and M J Brown Hyperaldosteronism: recent concepts, diagnosis, and management Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2001; 77(912): 639 - 644. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. El-Gharbawy, V. S. Nadig, J. M. Kotchen, C. E. Grim, K. B. Sagar, M. Kaldunski, P. Hamet, Z. Pausova, D. Gaudet, F. Gossard, et al. Arterial Pressure, Left Ventricular Mass, and Aldosterone in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, March 1, 2001; 37(3): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Giacche, A. Vuagnat, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, N. D. L. Fisher, M. Azizi, P. Corvol, G. H. Williams, and X. Jeunemaitre Aldosterone Stimulation by Angiotensin II : Influence of Gender, Plasma Renin, and Familial Resemblance Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 710 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Warnock Low-Renin and Nonmodulating Essential Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 395 - 397. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |