Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1999;34:590-597

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giltay, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stehouwer, C. D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giltay, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stehouwer, C. D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation

(Hypertension. 1999;34:590-597.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Sex Steroids, Insulin, and Arterial Stiffness in Women and Men

Erik J. Giltay; Jan Lambert; Louis J. G. Gooren; Jolanda M. H. Elbers; Mieke Steyn; Coen D. A. Stehouwer

From the Research Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction, and Metabolism (E.J.G., L.J.G.G., J.M.H.E.), the Department of Internal Medicine (J.L., M.S., C.D.A.S.), and the Institute for Cardiovascular Research (J.L., C.D.A.S.), University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Correspondence to C.D.A. Stehouwer, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail cda.stehouwer{at}azvu.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Arterial stiffness may be influenced by sex steroids and insulin; the association with fasting insulin level may be stronger in women than in men. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of sex steroid administration on (1) arterial stiffness and (2) the relationship between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness. Twelve male-to-female transsexuals were treated with ethinyl estradiol and cyproterone acetate, and 18 female-to-male transsexuals were treated with testosterone esters, with assessments made at baseline and after 4 and 12 months. Changes in distensibility and compliance coefficients (DC and CC, respectively) of the common carotid artery, femoral artery (FA), and brachial artery (BA) were analyzed in relation to changes in fasting plasma levels of glucose, insulin, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides. After 4 months of estrogens and antiandrogens in men, significant reductions in the CC and DC of the FA (P=0.006 and P=0.04, respectively) and BA (P=0.04 and P=0.04, respectively) were observed. In women, testosterone, on average, did not affect DC or CC, but the changes in fasting insulin level were strongly negatively associated with changes in the CC and DC, especially in the FA and BA. These associations were significantly less strong in genetic men and were independent of age, mean arterial pressure, and glucose and lipid levels. This experimental study shows (1) that short-term administration of estrogens and antiandrogens increases FA and BA stiffness in men and (2) that the fasting insulin level is a stronger determinant of arterial stiffness in women than in men.


Key Words: arteries • insulin • gender • estrogen • testosterone • coefficient, distensibility • coefficient, compliance


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Men are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) than women, but in non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, this gender difference is much less pronounced.1 2 3 4 A core element of non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is insulin resistance, and the question arises of whether insulin resistance or other elements clustered in the insulin resistance syndrome,5 such as hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, abdominal obesity, and hypertension, partially negate the normal gender difference in cardiovascular risk.

Large-artery stiffening, a major determinant of cardiac workload and systolic blood pressure,6 may contribute to the development of CVD. Data on a possible gender difference in arterial stiffness are contradictory. Measurement of pulse-wave velocity, an estimate of regional arterial stiffness, indicates that arteries in men are stiffer than those in premenopausal women.7 8 9 In contrast, local arterial stiffness of the common carotid artery (CCA), measured by ultrasound,10 11 12 and global vascular stiffness, derived from pulse-pressure waveform analysis,13 occur less in men than in women. Conflicting data on the modulating effects of endogenous14 and exogenous15 16 17 18 19 20 estrogens on regional17 18 19 20 and local arterial stiffness14 15 16 in women have also been published. Currently, there is no prospective information on the effects of estrogen or testosterone administration on arterial stiffness in men or women.

Gender differences have been found in the interrelations between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness in cross-sectional studies. A study of 4701 men and women showed that an 80% increase in fasting insulin level was associated with an increase of 5.1% in men and of 7.5% in women of Young's elastic modulus of the CCA, a measure of local arterial stiffness controlled for wall thickness.21 In a previous cross-sectional study, we found that fasting insulin level was positively and glucose utilization was negatively associated with arterial stiffness of the femoral artery (FA) in women but not in men.12 In this study, we investigated prospectively (1) the effects of cross-gender sex steroid administration on arterial stiffness indices of the CCA, FA, and brachial artery (BA) and (2) the influence of gender on the interrelationships between arterial stiffness and elements of insulin resistance syndrome.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We included 14 white male-to-female (M->F) transsexuals (median age, 26 years; range, 18 to 45 years) and 18 white female-to-male (F->M) transsexuals (median age, 23 years; range, 17 to 40 years). Baseline data of 24 of these subjects were reported previously.12 M->F transsexuals were treated with ethinyl estradiol (100 µg/d; Lynoral, Organon) in combination with the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (100 mg/d; Androcur, Schering). F->M transsexuals were treated with testosterone esters (250 mg every 2 weeks IM; Sustanon, Organon). One F->M transsexual reported earlier intake of oral contraceptives; all other F->M transsexuals had had regular menstrual cycles (28 to 31 days) before cross-gender sex hormone administration. There was no evidence of hypertension, CVD, or use of other sex hormones. Eight M->F transsexuals and 12 F->M transsexuals were smokers. Standardized radioimmunoassays were used to measure serum levels of 17ß-estradiol and testosterone. Serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured by immunometric luminescence assays. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the University Hospital Vrije Universiteit.

Hemodynamic Measurements
The distensibility coefficient (DC), reflecting intrinsic vascular wall elasticity, and the compliance coefficient (CC), reflecting buffering capacity of the vessel wall, were calculated from the arterial diameter (D) and changes in arterial diameter during the heart cycle ({delta}D; ie, distension) and pulse pressure ({delta}P) as follows: DC=(2x{delta}D)/(Dx{delta}P) and CC=({pi}x{delta}DxD)/(2x{delta}P). All hemodynamic measurements were performed with use of a noninvasive ultrasound system as previously described11 12 22 23 after at least 15 minutes of supine rest in a temperature-controlled, quiet room. All subjects refrained from smoking or consuming caffeine for at least 4 hours before examination. The within-subject coefficients of variation for DC and CC are 7.7% and 8.3%, respectively, for the CCA; 13.4% and 12.5%, respectively, for the FA; and 16.1% and 15.6%, respectively, for the BA.22 23 The systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed 4 times at 5-minute intervals with an automatic oscillometric device (BP-8800, Colin) and then averaged. Twelve-month measurements were not obtained in 2 M->F transsexuals, and some other measurements could not be obtained successfully for practical reasons (detailed in Tables 1 to 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Endocrine Variables and Vessel Wall Properties Before and After 4 and 12 Months of Estrogen and Antiandrogen Administration in M->F Transsexual Subjects


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Endocrine Variables and Vessel Wall Properties Before and After 4 and 12 Months of Androgen Administration in F->M Transsexual Subjects


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Associations Between Proportional Changes, of 4 Months versus baseline, of D, CC, and DC and Proportional Changes of Elements Clustered in the Insulin Resistance Syndrome

Elements Clustered in the Insulin Resistance Syndrome
Fasting blood samples were obtained in all subjects to measure plasma levels of glucose, insulin (using a immunoradiometric assay, Biosource Diagnostics), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (using enzymatic colorimetric methods, Boehringer Mannheim). Body mass index was assessed (weight/height2), and lean body mass and total body fat were estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA 101/S, RJL Systems). Body circumferences were measured in duplicate to calculate the waist-to-hip ratio. Areas of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat (using a magnetic resonance imaging technique) and glucose utilization rate (M [expressed as mg glucose/kg lean body mass · min]; with a 2-hour hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) were assessed in 9 M->F and 12 F->M transsexuals at baseline and after 12 months as previously described.12

Statistical Analysis
Variables with skewed distributions (abdominal subcutaneous fat area and plasma levels of insulin and triglycerides) were logarithmically transformed before analysis to normalize their distributions. Student's t test for independent and paired samples was used to compare differences between men and women and between different artery sites. In the M->F and the F->M groups (analyzed separately), an ANOVA for repeated measurements was used to analyze the effects of cross-gender sex hormones. Interaction terms were included in an ANOVA to test whether the effects of cross-gender sex hormones on the CC and DC differed between genetic men and women. An ANCOVA for repeated measurements was used to analyze the influence of elements clustered in the insulin resistance syndrome on hemodynamic measurements at the 3 time points (with {epsilon}2 as the measure of effect size). Univariate and bivariate linear regression analyses were used to explore interrelationships between proportional changes, at 4 months, of hemodynamic measurements and elements clustered in the insulin resistance syndrome. Interaction terms of genetic gender and insulin changes were included in linear regression analyses to test whether the associations of the proportional changes of hemodynamic measurements and fasting insulin levels differed between genetic men and women. If a value was below the lower limit of detection, that value was used for statistical calculations (for LH, 0.3 IU/L; FSH, 0.5 IU/L; 17ß-estradiol, 90 pmol/L; and testosterone, 1.0 nmol/L). P<0.05 (2-way) was considered statistically significant. The software used was SPSS for Windows, version 8.0.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Pretreatment Values
All subjects were eugonadal at baseline according to clinical and laboratory criteria. D and CC of the BA were statistically significantly larger in men than in women (P=0.009 and P=0.001, respectively). No significant gender differences were found in other hemodynamic measurements, nor in smoking status, body mass index, and plasma levels of glucose, insulin, triglyceride, and HDL-C (Tables 1 and 2).

Effects of Cross-Gender Sex Hormone Administration
After estrogen and antiandrogen administration to M->F transsexuals, serum levels of testosterone, LH, and FSH decreased (Table 1). In M->F transsexuals, 4 months of administration of estrogens and antiandrogens, as compared with baseline, was associated with significant reductions of {delta}D, CC, and DC of the FA (P=0.02, P=0.006, and P=0.04, respectively) and BA (P=0.01, P=0.04, and P=0.04, respectively; Figure 1) and a significant increase in heart rate (P=0.005; Table 1). The proportional changes, at 4 months, in {delta}D of the FA and BA were significantly different than the change in {delta}D of the CCA (P=0.047 and P=0.01, respectively), whereas changes in {delta}D were similar for the FA and BA (P=0.85). The proportional changes, at 4 months, in heart rate were not significantly associated with any proportional change of the DC or CC of the CCA, FA, and BA, except for the DC of the FA (ß= -0.64, P=0.04). After 12 months, the CC of the FA remained significantly decreased (P=0.03; Figure 1) and heart rate remained significantly increased (P=0.02) as compared with baseline values. No significant changes were seen in D values (Table 1).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plots showing the DC and CC (with bars representing SEM) of the CCA, FA, and BA at baseline and after 4 and 12 months in 12 M->F transsexuals receiving estrogens and antiandrogens and 18 F->M transsexuals receiving androgens. After 4 months of estrogen and antiandrogen administration, significant reductions, as compared with baseline, of CC and DC of the FA and BA were found. Interaction analysis showed that estrogenic and androgenic effects were not significantly different. *P<0.05 (paired sample t test comparing baseline and 4-month values). {dagger}P<0.05 (ANOVA for repeated measurements comparing baseline and 4- and 12-month values).

After testosterone administration to F->M transsexuals, the serum testosterone level increased markedly, whereas serum levels of 17ß-estradiol, LH, and FSH decreased only slightly (Table 2). The CC and DC of the CCA, FA, and BA did not change significantly over time (Figure 1). The D values of the FA and BA increased significantly after 4 and 12 months of androgen administration in an ANOVA for repeated measurements (Table 2). Interaction terms in an ANOVA for repeated measurements showed that the effects on CC and DC did not differ significantly between administration of estrogens+antiandrogens or androgens (for all, P>=0.23; Figure 1), except for the CC of the FA, which tended to decrease in genetic men as compared with genetic women (P=0.07).

Associations With Elements Clustered in the Insulin Resistance Syndrome
Table 3 shows the associations between proportional changes, at 4 months, of D, CC, and DC with proportional changes of elements clustered in the insulin resistance syndrome. The proportional change of fasting insulin level was the most robust determinant of the proportional changes of {delta}D, CC, and DC, with positive associations in M->F transsexuals and negative associations in F->M transsexuals (Table 3 and Figure 2). Interaction analysis showed that these associations differed significantly between the genetic sexes (Figure 2). Associations of proportional changes of insulin level with those of the CC and DC of the FA in M->F transsexuals and with those of the CC and DC of the FA and the CC of the BA in F->M transsexuals were independent of smoking status, age, and proportional changes of MAP, body mass index, and glucose, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels. To establish this, several bivariate regression analyses were performed with proportional changes of the CC or DC as the dependent variable and with proportional changes of fasting insulin level combined with each of the possible confounding variables as the 2 independent variables.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Scatter plots showing the association between the proportional changes, at 4 months vs baseline, of plasma insulin levels and those of {delta}D, CC, and DC. Univariate regression lines in 14 M->F and in 18 F->M transsexuals are given. Interaction terms in linear regression analyses showed that the effects of cross-sex hormones in genetic men and women were all significantly different. When the 1 M->F transsexual and the 1 F->M transsexual with a proportional change in fasting insulin level >50% were excluded from the analyses, interaction terms were still statistically significant determinants for DC of the CCA and for {delta}D, CC, and DC of the FA (for all, P<0.05), and there was a statistical trend for CC of the BA (P=0.07).

When both the M->F and F->M transsexuals with a proportional change in fasting insulin level >50% (Figure 2) were excluded from the analyses, the results were similar: Proportional changes in fasting insulin level were still positively associated with those of the CC of the FA (ß=0.64, P=0.048) in M->F transsexuals and negatively associated with those of the CC and DC of the FA (ß=-0.72, P=0.001 and ß=-0.64, P=0.006, respectively) and of the CC of the BA (ß=-0.56, P=0.02) in F->M transsexuals.

ANCOVA of values at baseline and after 4 and 12 months of cross-gender sex hormone administration was used to analyze the variability in DC and CC explained by the fasting insulin level. In M->F transsexuals, fasting insulin level significantly determined the variability of the CC and DC of the CCA ({epsilon}2=0.25, P=0.04 and {epsilon}2=0.35, P=0.003, respectively). In F->M transsexuals, fasting insulin level significantly determined the variability of the CC of the CCA ({epsilon}2=0.15, P=0.02), CC and DC of the FA ({epsilon}2=0.27, P=0.002 and {epsilon}2=0.15, P=0.03, respectively), and CC and DC of the BA ({epsilon}2=0.35, P<0.001 and {epsilon}2=0.29, P=0.001, respectively). Visual interpretation of relationships between fasting insulin level and the CC and DC indicated that these were largely positively related in genetic men and inversely related in genetic women, both before and during hormone administration (data not shown).

With the use of ANCOVA, we also analyzed whether the variability of D, DC, or CC could be explained by glucose utilization, the abdominal subcutaneous fat area, or the visceral fat area. None of these covariables could significantly explain the variability of the hemodynamic measurements of the CCA, FA, or BA (data not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We prospectively studied the effects of cross-gender sex steroid administration on arterial stiffness indices in healthy women and men. Because of the heterogeneity of the arterial tree, we studied 3 sites. On the basis of the elastin, collagen, and smooth muscle content in the vessel wall, the CCA is regarded as an elastic vessel, whereas the FA and BA are regarded as muscular vessels.6 Our findings suggest that administration of high-dose estrogens and antiandrogens to young men may have short-term deteriorating effects on FA and BA compliance and distensibility. Estrogenic effects on arterial stiffness may partly account for the somewhat increased short-term risk of CVD associated with relatively high-dose estrogen administration in men with prostate cancer24 or myocardial infarction.25 In addition, administration of estrogens and progestogens to postmenopausal women with26 or without27 coronary disease does not decrease and may even increase the short-term risk of CVD, which contradicts epidemiological data.28 In genetic women, we found that androgen administration did not affect arterial stiffness, whereas the D of the FA and BA increased, which may be an adaptation to increased water retention29 and muscle mass. An increased muscle mass might affect the D of the FA and BA more than that of the CCA, because the FA and BA supply blood to muscular territories.

In previous cross-sectional studies, postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy was associated with higher CCA distensibility15 16 and lower aortofemoral and leg pulse-wave velocity,18 whereas no differences were found in brachial and aortodorsalis pulse-wave velocity19 and CCA distensibility16 with estrogen-progesterone combination therapy. Furthermore, natural fluctuations of estrogen levels during the menstrual cycle did not influence the CC and DC of the CCA and FA,14 and long-term use of the synthetic steroid tibolone did not influence aortic pulse-wave velocity.17 A longitudinal study showed that short-term withdrawal of estrogen-containing therapy, either alone or combined with progesterone, in postmenopausal women decreased systemic arterial compliance and increased leg pulse-wave velocity, both of which were restored to baseline values after reinstitution of therapy.20

At baseline, we found a higher CC in men than in women, which was significant for the BA and nonsignificant for the FA and CCA (48%, 27%, and 13%, respectively) and which may have been due to the relatively larger D that is part of the numerator of the equation for CC (Tables 1 and 2). Larger artery calibers and a lower heart rate13 in men as compared with women may be related to the greater body height of men.12 30

Possible Determinants of Changes in Arterial Stiffness
The mechanism of action of sex steroids on arterial stiffness is not well understood. First, estrogens could act directly on vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells, which contain estrogen receptors.31 32 Second, estrogens,33 like androgens,29 increase body water retention. Estrogens also increase arginine vasopressin release,33 myocardial contractility, and stroke volume34 and, in our subjects, increased heart rate. This possibly reduced stroke volume as well as the time interval in which the pulsatile pressure expands the arterial wall. Because of the dynamic viscoelastic properties of the vessel wall, the maximum increase in D falls as a consequence of increased heart rate. This could have led to a decreased {delta}D value at 4 months, as was found in the FA and BA. In anesthetized rats, it has been shown that acute increases in heart rate are accompanied by reductions in arterial compliance and distensibility.35

Third, the effects may be mediated by an action on insulin sensitivity or circulating insulin. Estrogens may induce insulin resistance36 and, in our subjects, increased the fasting insulin level, which is a fair marker of insulin resistance among subjects with normal glucose tolerance.37 We previously concluded that arterial stiffening in women is positively associated with fasting insulin levels or insulin resistance,12 which is supported by the present experimental data. Insulin resistance may lead to a disturbance of cellular cation transport (or be a marker thereof), which may promote vasoconstriction and arterial stiffening,38 affecting the muscular FA and BA more than the elastic CCA. However, insulin may also directly affect the vessel wall. Insulin induces hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle in vitro39 ; insulin receptors have been found in the arterial wall40 ; and CCA wall thickness, which is inversely associated with CCA distensibility,16 is positively related to insulin level in vivo.41

The contrasting associations in men and women between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness suggest that being a genetic woman (ie, the presence of 2 X chromosomes) determines the relationship between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness. Alternatively, the presence of circulating estrogens, which were not substantially reduced in genetic women (cf Table 2), may be the basis for the stronger relationship between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness in women than in men. Our findings may be relevant to the observation that diabetic women, as compared with diabetic men, are at a relatively higher risk of developing CVD1 2 and have a worse prognosis after myocardial infarction.3 4

Limitations and Strengths of Study
Our analyses were limited by the fact that because of the nature of the treatment indication, we could include only relatively small numbers of subjects, did not include a control group, and used an open study design. However, a regression toward the mean effect seems unlikely with regard to the effects on FA and BA stiffness in men treated with estrogens and antiandrogens, because shifts in FA and BA distension differed significantly from those of the CCA. Local pulse pressure was not measured, but BA pulse pressure did not appear to modulate the association between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness, as illustrated by the significantly stronger associations in women than in men between shifts of fasting insulin level and locally measured {delta}D (not corrected for {delta}P and D). We applied statistical analyses many times by including several covariates, without correcting for their multiplicity. However, our main finding, the association between fasting insulin level and arterial stiffness, was strong, consistent in the 2 muscular arteries, robust during and after sex steroid challenges, and significantly different between the genetic sexes. Moreover, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report from an experimental study of the stronger association in women than in men between muscular artery stiffness and fasting insulin level, which has been reported in cross-sectional studies.12 21

Conclusions
Estrogen and antiandrogen administration for 4 months increases FA and BA stiffness in men, whereas the effects wear off somewhat after 12 months. In women, testosterone administration did not affect CC or DC, but the proportional changes of fasting insulin level were strongly negatively associated with the proportional changes of CC and DC. These associations were consistent in the FA and BA, were significantly less strong in genetic men, and were independent of age, MAP, and glucose and lipid levels. Fasting insulin level in the presence of estrogens may be a stronger determinant of arterial stiffness in women than in men.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3A. Continued


*    Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to Jos A.J. Megens for assistance in the logistics of this study. C.D.A.S. is supported by a Clinical Research Fellowship from the Diabetes Fonds Nederland and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.

Received March 4, 1999; first decision April 6, 1999; accepted June 8, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111:383–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bell DSH. Stroke in the diabetic patient. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:213–219.[Abstract]
  3. Kannel W. Lipids, diabetes, and coronary heart disease: insights from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1985;110:1100–1107.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Tofler GH, Stone PH, Muller JE, Willich SN, Davis VG, Poole WK, Strauss HW, Willerson JT, Jaffe AS, Robertson T, Passamani E, Braunwald E. Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:473–482.[Abstract]
  5. Laws A, Reaven GM. Insulin resistance and risk factors for coronary heart disease. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;7:1063–1078.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Smulyan H, Safar ME. Systolic blood pressure revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1407–1413.[Abstract]
  7. Laogun AA, Gosling RG. In vivo arterial compliance in man. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1982;3:201–212.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Lehmann ED, Parker JR, Hopkins KD, Taylor MG, Gosling RG. Validation and reproducibility of pressure-corrected aortic distensibility measurements using pulse-wave-velocity Doppler ultrasound. J Biomed Eng. 1993;15:221–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Stimpel M. Influence of sex on arterial hemodynamics and blood pressure: role of body height. Hypertension. 1995;26:514–519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Riley WA, Barnes RW, Schey HM. An approach to the non-invasive periodic assessment of arterial elasticity in the young. Prev Med. 1984;13:169–184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Van Merode T, Hick PJJ, Hoeks APG, Smeets FAM, Reneman RS. Differences in carotid artery wall properties between presumed-healthy men and women. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14:571–574.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Giltay EJ, Lambert J, Elbers JMH, Gooren LJG, Asscheman H, Stehouwer CDA. Arterial compliance and distensibility are modulated by body composition in both men and women, but by insulin sensitivity only in women. Diabetologia. 1999;42:214–221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hayward CS, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in the central arterial pressure waveform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;30:1863–1871.
  14. Willekes C, Hoogland HJ, Keizer HA, Hoeks AP, Reneman RS. Female sex hormones do not influence arterial wall properties during the normal menstrual cycle. Clin Sci. 1997;92:487–491.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Liang Y-L, Teede H, Shiel LM, Thomas A, Craven R, Sachithanandan N, McNiel JJ, Cameron JD, Dart A, McGrath BP. Effects of oestrogen and progesterone on age-related changes in arteries of postmenopausal women. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997;24:457–459.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. McGrath BP, Liang Y-L, Teede H, Shiel LM, Cameron JD, Dart A. Age-related deterioration in arterial structure and function in postmenopausal women: impact of hormone replacement therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1149–1156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lehmann ED, Hopkins KD, Parker JR, Turay RC, Rymer J, Fogelman I, Gosling RG. Aortic distensibility in post-menopausal women receiving tibolone. Br J Radiol. 1994;76:701–705.
  18. Rajkumar C, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, Waddell T, Mehra R, Christophidis N, Komesaroff PA, McGrath B, Jennings GL, Sudhir K, Dart AM. Hormonal therapy increases arterial compliance in postmenopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:350–356.[Abstract]
  19. Hayward CS, Knight DC, Wren BG, Kelly RP. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on non-invasive cardiovascular haemodynamics. J Hypertens. 1997;15:987–993.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Waddell TK, Rajkumar C, Cameron JD, Jennings GL, Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Withdrawal of hormone therapy for 4 weeks decreases arterial compliance in postmenopausal women. J Hypertens. 1999;17:413–418.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Salomaa V, Riley W, Kark JD, Nardo C, Folsom AR. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with arterial stiffness indexes: the ARIC Study. Circulation. 1995;91:1432–1443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kool MJF, Van Merode T, Reneman RS, Hoeks APG, Struyker Boudier HAJ, Van Bortel LMAB. Evaluation of reproducibility of a vessel wall movement detector system for assessment of large artery properties. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:614–619.
  23. Lambert J, Smulders RA, Aarsen M, Donker AJM, Stehouwer CDA. Carotid artery stiffness is increased in microalbuminuric IDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:99–103.[Abstract]
  24. Blackard CE, Doe RP, Mellinger GT, Byar DP. Incidence of cardiovascular disease and death in patients receiving diethylstilbestrol for carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer. 1970;26:249–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Coronary Drug Project Research Group. The Coronary Drug Project: initial findings leading to modifications of its research protocol. JAMA. 1970;214:1303–1313.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605–613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hemminki E, McPherson K. Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer: pooled data from clinical trials. BMJ. 1997;315:149–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Barrett-Connor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1991;265:1861–1867.[Abstract]
  29. Holma P. Effect of anabolic steroid (methandienone) on central and peripheral blood flow in well-trained male athletes. Ann Clin Res. 1977;9:215–221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Metivier F, Aarsen M. Body height as a determinant of carotid pulse contour in humans. J Hypertens. 1992;1(suppl 6):S93–S96.
  31. Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J, Isner JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;89:1501–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Karas RH, Patterson BL, Medelsohn ME. Human vascular smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen receptor. Circulation. 1994;89:1943–1950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Stachenfeld NS, DiPietro L, Palter SF, Nadel ER. Estrogen influences osmotic secretion of AVP and body water balance in postmenopausal women. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:R187–R195.
  34. Veille JC, Morton MJ, Burry K, Nemeth M, Speroff L. Estradiol and hemodynamics during ovulation induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63:721–723.[Abstract]
  35. Mangoni AA, Mircoli L, Giannattasio C, Ferrari AU, Mancia G. Heart rate-dependence of arterial distensibility in vivo. J Hypertens. 1996;14:897–901.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Polderman KH, Gooren LJG, Asscheman H, Bakker A, Heine RJ. Induction of insulin resistance by androgens and estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:265–271.[Abstract]
  37. Laakso M. How good a marker is insulin level for insulin resistance? Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:959–965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Resnick LM, Militianu D, Cunnings AJ, Pipe JG, Evelhoch JL, Soulen RL. Direct magnetic resonance determination of aortic distensibility in essential hypertension: relation to age, abdominal visceral fat, and in situ intracellular free magnesium. Hypertension. 1997;30:654–659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Pfeiffle B, Ditschuneit H. Effect of insulin on growth of cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells. Diabetologia. 1981;20:155–158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. King GL, Goodman AD, Buzney S, Moses A, Kahn CR. Receptors and growth-promoting effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factor on cells from bovine retinal capillaries and aorta. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1028–1036.
  41. Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, Weitzman S, Ma J, Chambless LE, Barnes RW, Cram KB, Hutchinson RG. Relation of carotid artery wall thickness to diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose and insulin, body size, and physical activity. Stroke. 1994;25:66–73.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. J. Gooren, E. J. Giltay, and M. C. Bunck
Long-Term Treatment of Transsexuals with Cross-Sex Hormones: Extensive Personal Experience
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. C M Bunck, A. W F T Toorians, P. Lips, and L. J G Gooren
The effects of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole on bone metabolism and cardiovascular risk indices in ovariectomized, androgen-treated female-to-male transsexuals.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 154(4): 569 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Moore, A. Wisniewski, and A. Dobs
Endocrine Treatment of Transsexual People: A Review of Treatment Regimens, Outcomes, and Adverse Effects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3467 - 3473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. Ritz
Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Urinary Albumin: Vive la Petite Difference
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2003; 14(5): 1415 - 1416.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron
Comparison of generalized and gender-specific transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveforms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1150 - H1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Tatchum-Talom, C. Martel, and A. Marette
Influence of estrogen on aortic stiffness and endothelial function in female rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H491 - H498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. P. M. Kruijver, A. Fernández-Guasti, M. Fodor, E. M. Kraan, and D. F. Swaab
Sex Differences in Androgen Receptors of the Human Mamillary Bodies Are Related to Endocrine Status Rather Than to Sexual Orientation or Transsexuality
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 818 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giltay, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stehouwer, C. D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giltay, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stehouwer, C. D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation