(Hypertension. 1999;34:854-858.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, Hospital Alemán (J.E.T., M.A.), and the Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas (ININCA) (L.F., F.I.), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Correspondence to Felipe Inserra, MD, Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas (ININCA), Marcelo T. Alvear 2270, Buenos Aires (1122), Argentina. E-mail expneph{at}fibertel.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: calcium antagonists amlodipine hyperoxaluria tubulointerstitial lesions fibrosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conflicting results exist concerning the protective effect in experimental glomerulopathies,5 6 as well as in different hypertension models.7 8 Kloke et al9 recently published an important review about the controversial risk/benefit relationship in animal models and the clinical use of CAs in renal disease. In spite of this, there are few data related to tubulointerstitial (TI) changes in these studies, and nothing has been published yet in a specific TI lesion model.
Chronic hyperoxaluric states are a recognized cause of TI disease. In the ethylene glycol (ETG)induced hyperoxaluria animal model, we and other authors have found serious damage to the renal TI. The lesions were characterized by tubular epithelial cell necrosis, calcium oxalate crystal deposits in tubular lumens, inflammatory infiltrates, and proliferation of resident interstitial cells, such as fibroblasts and their transdifferentiation to myofibroblasts, and therefore by an increase in extracellular matrix and fibrosis.10 11 Significant protection against these lesions was conferred by an ACE inhibitor, enalapril.11
The present study was conducted to evaluate a possible beneficial effect of amlodipine, a 1,4-dihydropyridine class of CA, in this model of primary TI lesions produced by hyperoxaluria.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) initially weighing 250 to 300 g were housed in metabolic cages at a room temperature of 21±2°C with a 12-hour light/dark cycle (7 AM to 7 PM). After a 7-day period, they were divided into 4 groups: control group (G1, n=6), ETG group (G2, n=6), ETG plus amlodipine (ETG+A) group (G3, n=6), and amlodipine-only group (G4, n=6). All animals were allowed to drink regular tap water and were fed standard rat chow (16% to 18% protein, Cargill-Argentina) ad libitum. During a 4-week period, ETG 1% (as a precursor for oxalates) was administered to G2 and G3 rats, and amlodipine 2 mg · kg-1 · d-1 was administered to G3 and G4 rats by gavage. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected under 2 mL of toluene (Aldrich Chemical Co) for pH, creatinine, oxalate, and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) measurements at baseline and at the end of the experiment. After 4 weeks, all animals were killed under anesthesia (pentobarbital 40 mg/kg body weight IP) for microscopic studies. Rats were bled through the aorta before they were killed, and blood samples were used for creatinine determinations.
Blood Pressure Measurement
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by tail-cuff
plethysmography. Measurements were obtained with the rats restrained
without anesthesia in a plastic chamber. A pneumatic pulse
transducer positioned on the ventral surface of the tail distal to the
occlusion cuff detected return of the pulse after a slow deflation of
the cuff.
Cuff pressure was determined by a pneumatic pulse transducer with a programmed electrosphygmomanometer PE-300 (Narco Bio-Systems), and pulses were recorded on a physiograph MK-IIIS (Narco Bio-Systems). A minimum of 3 such determinations were taken at each session, and the SBP registered was the average of the 3 readings of 3 minutes each.
Biochemical Procedures
Aliquots of sera and urine were assayed for
creatinine by the enzymatic UV method (Randox Laboratories
Ltd). Urine pH was determined with a pH meter (model PHM84, research pH
meter; Radiometer Copenhagen). Oxalate was determined by the enzymatic
method (Sigma Diagnostics). Creatinine
clearance was calculated by a standard formula. Previous urinary
concentrations were determined by microcentrifuge filters
(ultrafree-MC NMWL 5000; Sigma Chemical Co), and urinary
albumin concentration was measured by the radial
immunodiffusion method (Bind a Rid, Nanorid Products, The Binding
Site Ltd).
Kidney Processing and Examination
The abdominal aorta was catheterized, and the kidneys were
perfused with saline solution. Perfusion was continued until the renal
parenchyma looked extremely pale. After removal of the capsule and
perinephric fat, kidneys were cut longitudinally and fixed in
phosphate-buffered 10% formaldehyde (pH 7.2).
The kidneys were embedded in paraffin. Three-micrometer sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acidSchiff reagent, and Masson's trichrome.
Morphological Analysis
Twenty separate histological sections, 10 from
the cortex and 10 from the medulla, were studied in each animal by use
of an image analyzer (Bioscan-OPTIMAS). Morphological
analysis was assessed on 10 microscopic fields per section
examined at a magnification of x200, with the observer blind to the
animal treatment group, and the data were averaged.
TI lesion scores for inflammatory cell infiltrate, tubular atrophy,
interstitial fibrosis, and oxalate deposits were each
graded according to the following scale: 0=absent; 1=mild (involving
25% of each microscopic field); 2=moderate (>26% and
50%);
3=severe (>51% and
75%); and 4=very severe (>76%).
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SE. All statistical
analyses used absolute values and were processed through
GraphPad Prism version 2.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc). For
parameters with gaussian distributions, all comparisons
among groups were performed with ANOVA. The difference of mean values
between 2 groups was assessed by a 2-tailed t test.
Statistical analysis for histological data was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric ANOVA) and Dunn multiple comparisons test. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
G2 rats (ETG) showed an increase in UAE compared with the other groups (P<0.01) and lower creatinine clearance, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. In contrast, G3 animals (ETG+A) had a significant reduction in UAE that was statistically different from the levels in G2 rats (ETG) (Figure 1).
|
Light microscopic examination showed that G2 animals had diffuse TI lesions with large amounts of oxalate crystals in the tubular lumen and epithelial tubular cells (Figure 1). In the same group, proximal tubules in the epithelial cells presented important numbers of vacuoles and hydropic changes. In a large number of tubules, epithelial cell atrophy was observed with significant inflammatory cell infiltrate in the interstitium (Figures 2 and 3). Furthermore, TI lesion scores revealed that G2 rats (ETG) had significantly more damage than rats in the other groups, as shown in Table 3. In contrast, G3 rats (ETG+A) showed considerably fewer lesions in the tubules and interstitium, as described above, especially related to the inflammatory cell infiltrate, which was absent (Figures 4 and 5); therefore, these rats had lower TI lesion scores, as indicated in Table 3.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Progression of TI has been evaluated in only a few reports of glomerular injury or hypertensive lesions, as well as in experimental chronic renal failure, and conflicting results have been shown.1 16 17 Thus far, no data are available with regard to a primary TI disease model.
In the present study using a TI lesion model, we found significant protection was conferred by amlodipine on both epithelial tubular cells and renal interstitial tissue, with scanty inflammatory cell infiltrates and deposit of calcium oxalate crystal in the tubular lumen. Therefore, renal function, as expressed by normal creatinine clearance, was preserved (Table 2).
Recently, we11 demonstrated a dramatic amount of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) in the TI area and increased collagen type III in the interstitium in hyperoxaluric rats. TGF-ß1, a potent fibrogenetic cytokine, should be involved in the pathogenic pathway to develop tissue lesions by oxalate. However, it is currently unclear which is the primary stimulus to start the pathway for tubular and interstitial lesions by hyperoxaluria. Studies with LLC-PK1 cells (a line of renal epithelial cells with characteristics of proximal tubular cells) revealed that high oxalate concentration acts as a toxin, inducing a marked increase in free-radical production, resulting in cellular damage.18 High levels of oxalate seem to act to damage the tubular cell by increasing free radical production in a number of ways: they act as a precursor in the generation of a reactive metabolite; they alter mitochondrial function; they modify the activities of various cytosolic enzymes; and they inhibit endogenous free radicalscavenging enzymes.18
Hypoxia produced by injury and loss of peritubular capillaries due to interstitial damage can contribute to overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially in high metabolic cellular activity situations like oxalate tubular overload. An additional source of ROS may be inflammatory cell infiltrates, which are present in the lesion focus.
As discussed, there were no significant changes in blood pressure in any group at the end of the experiment. This fact suggests that the mechanism by which amlodipine protects against renal TI lesions is not associated with hemodynamic variations. In support of this hypothesis, nifedipine, a dihydropyridine CA, has demonstrated protection against interstitial lesions in the ischemic injury model by administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. This effect was unrelated to either renal hemodynamic changes or blood pressure modification.19
A prominent pathway postulated to mediate the renal-protective actions of CA includes their ability to ameliorate injury by retarding renal growth; to attenuate the mitogenic effects of diverse cytokines and growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor and platelet-activating factor; and to act as a free radical scavenger.20 21 Moreover, in cell culture of human smooth muscle cells, it recently has been recognized that felodipine, another dihydropyridine CA, produces inhibition in superoxide production22 and prevents glutathione loss.21
Considering that ROS participate in oxalate TI injury18 and that this could contribute to initiation of the various inflammation pathways, the role of CA in relation to the interruption of this process could be relevant.
Finally, an additional mechanism to protect epithelial tubular cells could be amelioration of mitochondrial calcium overload, which results in mitochondria dysfunction and eventual cell death.23
The hyperoxaluric animals not treated by amlodipine showed higher UAE. In accordance with various recent studies, proteinuria may participate in the pathogenesis of TI lesions.13 24 Moreover, in a very recent study by Eppel et al25 in which the mechanism by which filtered albumin is retrieved by the postglomerular transcellular pathway across the proximal tubular epithelium is clarified, the authors suggest that this is a potential target for malfunction in renal diseases that increase proteinuria. On the other hand, in our experiment, UAE was significantly lower in the hyperoxaluric rats treated by amlodipine. Although it is well known that amlodipine has no effect on proteinuria, it is recognized that CAs, especially dihydropyridine agents, have effects on the proximal tubule.26 Therefore, our findings on UAE, although limited to this particular model of primary TI lesion disease, could illustrate another factor that contributes to a decrease in TI injury.
In conclusion, our data suggest that amlodipine could provide a beneficial effect against TI lesions caused by hyperoxaluria and therefore preserve renal function, probably by a nonhemodynamic pathway.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 8, 1999; first decision June 15, 1999; accepted July 21, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dworkin LD, Benstein JA, Parker M, Tolbert E, Feiner HD. Calcium antagonists and converting enzyme inhibitors reduce renal injury by different mechanisms. Kidney Int. 1993;43:808814.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Nifedipine versus fosinopril in uninephrectomized diabetic rats. Kidney Int. 1992;41:891897.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Brunner FP, Thiel G, Hermle M, Bock HA, Mihatsch MJ. Long term enalapril and verapamil in rats with reduced renal mass. Kidney Int. 1989;36:969977.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Podjarny E, Bernheim JL, Pomeranz A, Rathaus M,
Pomeranz M, Green J, Bernheim J. Effect of timing of antihypertensive
therapy on glomerular injury: comparison between captopril
and diltiazem. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1993;8:501506.
6.
Remuzzi A, Imberti O, Puntorierei S, Malanchini B,
MacConi D, Magrini L, Remuzzi G. Dissociation between antiproteinuric
and antihypertensive effect of angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibition in rats. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:F1034F1044.
7. Irzyniec T, Mall G, Greber D, Ritz E. Beneficial effect of nifedipine and moxonidine on glomerulosclerosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats: a micromorphometric study. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:437443.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Dworkin LD, Tolbert E, Recht PA, Hersch JC, Feiner H,
Levin IR. Effects of amlodipine on glomerular filtration,
growth and injury in experimental hypertension.
Hypertension. 1996;27:245250.
9. Kloke HJ, Branten AJ, Huysmans FT, Wetzels JF. Antihypertensive treatment of patients with proteinuric renal diseases: risk or benefits of calcium channel blockers? Kidney Int. 1998;53:15591573.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Chonko AM, Richardson WP. Urate and uric acid nephropathy, cystinosis, and oxalosis. In: Tisher CC, Brenner BM, eds. Renal Pathology, With Clinical and Functional Correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1994:14131441.
11. Toblli JE, Stella I, de Cavanagh E, Angerosa M, Inserra F, Ferder L. Enalapril prevents tubulointerstitial lesions by hyperoxaluria. Hypertension. 1999;33(pt II):225231.
12. Nath KA. Tubulointerstitial disease as a major determinant of progressive renal injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 1992;20:117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Eddy AA. Expression of genes that promote renal interstitial fibrosis in rats with proteinuria. Kidney Int. 1996;49(suppl 54):S49S54.
14. Klahr S, Ishidoya S, Morrissey J. Role of angiotensin II tubulointerstitial fibrosis of obstructive nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:141146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Inserra F, Romano LA, de Cavanagh EMV, Ercole L, Ferder LF, Gomez RA. Renal interstitial sclerosis in aging: effects of enalapril and nifedipine. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:676680.[Abstract]
16. Kanno Y, Suzuki H, Okada H, Saruta T. Renal protective effects of amlodipine on partially nephrectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats fed a high-salt diet. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:480484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Gaber L, Walton C, Brown S, Bakris G. Effects of different antihypertensive treatments on morphologic progression of diabetic nephropathy in uninephrectomized dogs. Kidney Int. 1994;46:161169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Scheid C, Koul H, Hill WA, Luber-Narod J, Kennington L, Honeyman T, Jonassen J, Menon M. Oxalate toxicity in LLC-PK1 cells: role of free radicals. Kidney Int. 1996;49:413419.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Ribeiro MO, Antunes E, Muscara MN, De Nucci G, Zatz R.
Nifedipine prevents renal injury in rats with chronic
nitric oxide inhibition. Hypertension. 1995;26:150155.
20. Sugawara H, Tobise K, Kikuchi K. Antioxidant effects of calcium antagonist on rat myocardial membrane lipid peroxidation. Hypertens Res. 1996;19:223228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mak IT, Weglicki WB. Antioxidant activity of calcium channel blocking drugs. Biochem Pharmacol.. 1996;51:141150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Hishikawa K, Luscher TF. Felodipine inhibits
free-radical production by cytokines and glucose in
human smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1998;32:10111015.
23. Epstein M. Calcium antagonists and the kidney: implications for renal protection. In: Epstein M, ed. Calcium Antagonists in Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley & Belfus Inc; 1998:433465.
24. Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Benigni A. Understanding the nature of renal disease progression. Kidney Int. 1997;51:215.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Eppel GA, Osicka TM, Pratt LM, Jablonski P, Howden BO, Glasgow EF, Comper WD. The return of glomerular-filtered albumin to the rat vein. Kidney Int. 1999;55:18611870.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Buhler FR. Antihypertensive care with calcium antagonists. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM. Hypertension, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:28012814.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Du, Y.-Y. Fan, H. Hitomi, H. Kiyomoto, S. Kimura, C.-Z. Kong, T. Noma, M. Kohno, A. Nishiyama, and D. Nakano Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade and calcium channel blockade have different renoprotective effects on glomerular and interstitial injury in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F802 - F808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |