Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1999;34:865-871

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salas, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vío, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salas, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vío, C. P.

(Hypertension. 1999;34:865-871.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Long-Term Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition in Rat Pregnancy Reduces Renal Kallikrein

Sofía P. Salas; José F. Vuletin; Andrea Giacaman; Pedro Rosso; Carlos P. Vío

From the Center for Medical Research (S.P.S., J.F.V., A.G., P.R.) and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.P.S.) and Pediatrics (P.R.), School of Medicine, and the Department of Physiology (C.P.V.), Faculty of Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—This study was performed to test the hypothesis that long-term nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition during pregnancy may alter the predominance of the vasodilator kallikrein system. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with the competitive inhibitor of NOS N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 50 mg · kg-1 · d-1, dissolved in water) from days 7 to 21 of pregnancy. Rats were studied before treatment (day 5), at days 11, 17, and 21 of pregnancy (during treatment), and at postpartum days 7 and 21 (after the drug was withdrawn at delivery). Each group (n=5 to 8) had its corresponding control group (C) that received only vehicle. Additional rats were treated with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) alone or with an excess of L-arginine. At each study day, we measured blood pressure, collected urine overnight, obtained blood samples, and processed the kidneys for conventional histology and immunohistochemistry. In L-NNA rats, fetal and placental weights were reduced at days 17 and 21. Blood pressure was higher at days 17 and 21, returning to normal after L-NNA was removed. Urinary kallikrein activity was lower at days 11 and 17 (L-NNA=1147±213 and C=2317±146 nmol/16 h, P<0.001). Plasma renin activity was reduced at day 21 (L-NNA=9.6±2.1 and C=25.9±5 ng · mL-1 · h-1, P<0.05) and remained lower at postpartum day 7. L-NNA rats exhibited glomerular lesions and tubular atrophy, particularly of connecting tubules that displayed reduced kallikrein staining. Tubulointerstitial infiltrating macrophages (ED1+) were also observed. Renal lesions were present as early as day 11 and persisted at day 7 postpartum. L-NAME rats exhibited similar alterations that were attenuated with an excess of L-arginine. We postulate that the reduction in renal kallikrein may contribute to the hemodynamic alterations described in this model.


Key Words: pregnancy • nitric oxide • plasma renin activity • renal kallikrein • renal lesions • macrophages


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Normal pregnancy is characterized by a marked stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which causes renal water and sodium retention and increases plasma volume.1 2 In turn, plasma volume expansion allows a sustained elevation in cardiac output and, indirectly, in uterine blood flow, conditions necessary for normal fetal growth. Despite the rise in blood volume and the activation of the vasoconstrictor RAS, blood pressure decreases during pregnancy2 because of a marked reduction in peripheral vascular resistance associated with a predominance of vasodilator, such as kallikrein and nitric oxide (NO), over vasoconstrictor substances.3 Thus, systemic vasodilatation would initiate the series of hemodynamic changes that are important for fetal growth. Consistent with such a possibility, in normal pregnant rats we have demonstrated a rise in urinary kallikrein activity that precedes the increase in plasma renin activity (PRA).4 In addition, in conditions associated with a limited plasma volume expansion, such as idiopathic fetal growth restriction5 and preeclampsia,6 and in underweight mothers,7 we have demonstrated a significant reduction in urinary kallikrein activity.

Kallikrein, through kinin formation, stimulates the NO–NO synthase (NOS) pathway, which is also activated in pregnancy. The plasma level, metabolic production, and urinary excretion of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), the urinary excretion and plasma levels of the stable NO metabolite nitrate, and the expression and activity of different NOSs are increased in gravid animals.8 9 10 Long-term administration of NOS inhibitors, such as N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) and NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), to gravid rats causes sustained hypertension, reduced plasma volume, intrauterine growth retardation, proteinuria and thrombocytopenia, and renal morphological abnormalities that resemble those observed in women with preeclampsia.11 12 13 14 15

These observations led us to evaluate the hypothesis that long-term NOS inhibition during pregnancy may alter the predominance of the vasodilator kallikrein-kinin system (KKS), either by increasing renin or decreasing renal kallikrein, thus contributing to the hemodynamic alterations described in this model. In consequence, we explore the time course of the changes on PRA, urinary kallikrein activity, and renal levels of renin and kallikrein as assessed by immunohistochemistry, associated with NOS inhibition in pregnant rats.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Design
A total of 86 virgin Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 230 to 260 g, were used and maintained at the Center for Medical Research animal care facilities, under constant temperature (24°C) in a 12-hour light/dark cycle, with free access to standard rat chow and water. All procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional and international guidelines for animal welfare.

Rats in estrous phase were mated overnight with fertile males, and day 0 of pregnancy was determined by the presence of spermatozoa in vaginal smears. Following a protocol previously described,14 on day 7 of gestation the rats were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group that received 50 mg · kg-1 · d-1 of L-NNA dissolved in tap water.

Control and experimental groups were studied on days 11, 17, and 21 of pregnancy. Baseline values were obtained in another group of rats at day 5 of pregnancy, before randomization. Additional rats from both groups were allowed to deliver spontaneously and were studied on days 7 and 21 postpartum, after the drug was withdrawn at delivery. Five to 8 animals in each group per study day were used. Systolic blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography,14 and rats were individually placed in metabolic cages with free access to food and water from 5 PM to 9 AM On the following day, between 10 AM and 12 noon, the rats were weighed and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg). Blood samples obtained from the abdominal aorta were placed in tubes containing either liquid EDTA or sodium heparin. An aliquot was used for microhematocrit determination, the remaining samples were centrifuged at room temperature, and the plasma was frozen for later determinations of PRA and creatinine. The kidneys were rapidly removed for morphological analysis (see below). Maternal net body weight (after removal of all major organs), litter size, and weights of individual fetuses and placentas were recorded. In postpartum rats, the number and weight of the pups were registered. Urine was measured, divided into aliquots, frozen, and subsequently used for determinations of sodium, protein, creatinine excretion, and kallikrein activity.

To determine the specificity of the lesions, additional rats (n=6 per group) received the NOS inhibitor L-NAME (50 mg · kg-1 · d-1), alone or associated with an excess of L-arginine (2.7 g · kg-1 · d-1), or received the inactive stereoisomer D-NAME (50 mg · kg-1 · d-1), from days 7 to 21 of pregnancy. Experimental and control groups were studied on day 21 of pregnancy according to the same protocol as described above.

Hormonal and Biochemical Measurements
Kallikrein activity was determined by the amidase method using the synthetic substrate DL-Val-Leu-arginine-p-nitroanilide.4 16 PRA was determined by radioimmunoassay of generated angiotensin I under control conditions. The concentration of urinary sodium was measured by flame photometry (IL 343). Colorimetric reactions were used to determine plasma and urine levels of creatinine (Beckman Autoanalyzer). Urinary protein concentration was determined by Bradford's method (Bio-Rad protein assay).

Tissue Processing and Immunohistochemistry
Kidney slices 3 mm thick, including cortex, medulla, and papilla, were fixed by immersion in Bouin's solution for 24 to 48 hours at room temperature, dehydrated, embedded in Paraplast, serially sectioned at 7-µm thickness, and mounted on glass slides until immunohistochemistry was performed. In addition, the tissue sections were studied with conventional staining, such as hematoxylin-eosin and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS). Immunohistochemical staining for renal kallikrein and renin was performed according to the peroxidase/antiperoxidase (PAP) method as previously described.17 Briefly, the tissue sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and rinsed in 0.05 mol/L Tris-phosphate-saline buffer, pH 7.6, and incubated overnight with rabbit antiserum raised against rat tissue kallikrein (1:5000) or against renin (1:5000) at 22°C. The second antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:20), and the corresponding PAP complex (1:150) were applied for 30 minutes each at 22°C. The immunoperoxidase reaction was visualized by incubating sections in 0.1% (wt/vol) 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and 0.03% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide. The antisera and PAP complex were diluted in Tris buffer containing 0.25% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and 0.7% (wt/vol) {lambda}-carrageenan. To characterize the interstitial infiltrate, additional sections were incubated with ED1, a mouse monoclonal antiserum raised against rat monocytes and macrophages (1:400). The second antibody (rabbit anti-mouse) was used at a dilution of 1:400, and the third (goat anti-rabbit) was diluted 1:20. The PAP complex was used as above. Controls for the immunostaining procedure were prepared by omission of the first antibody or by its replacement with preimmune serum. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and then dehydrated, cleared with xylene, and coverslipped.

Quantitative Morphology
The tissue samples from all groups were coded and studied independently by 2 expert observers (S.P.S. and J.F.V.) in a blinded fashion. One section selected at random was used for each rat (5 to 8 rats per group), and at least 4 fields per section were studied. To estimate the intensity of the immunostaining at the cellular level, the observers made a single ordinal ranking (0 to 3), with 0 being absent, 1 being very faint yet distinguishable, 2 being moderate staining, and 3 the strongest staining. The comparison of staining intensity was done at a first antibody dilution of 1:5000. If any difference was observed, further dilutions of the first antibody were done until the staining disappeared.18 The tissue sections were observed and photographed on a Nikon Optiphot microscope, with a Nikon Microflex UFX IIA photographic system (Nikon Corp).

Source of Antisera and Chemicals
L-NNA, L-NAME, D-NAME, L-arginine, DL-Val-Leu-arginine-p-nitroanilide, {lambda}-carrageenan, Triton X-100, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine, and Tris were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co; Paraplast was purchased from Monoject Scientific; and the PAP complex was from Cappel. Rabbit antiserum against kallikrein was obtained from our laboratory17 ; the renin antibody was a gift from Dr François Alhenc-Gelas, INSERM U367, Paris, France; and a monoclonal antibody against macrophages (ED-1) was purchased from Serotec. The goat anti-rabbit IgG and the rabbit anti-mouse IgG were from Cappel.

Statistical Analysis
All data were expressed as arithmetic mean±SEM. Within each study day, we analyzed differences between the group means by an unpaired 2-tailed Student's t test, with a significance level of 95%, using the computer program Stat View II (Abacus Concepts Inc).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Net maternal weight at term (day 21 of pregnancy) was similar in both groups, whereas hematocrit values were higher in rats treated with L-NNA. No significant differences in creatinine clearance, urine volume, and urinary protein and sodium excretion were observed. Litter size was similar in both groups, and fetal and placental weights were significantly lower in L-NNA rats (Table). On day 17 of pregnancy, fetal weights (Control, 0.76±0.02 and L-NNA, 0.64±0.03 g, P<0.01) and placental weights (Control, 0.29±0.01 and L-NNA, 0.24±0.01 g, P<0.01) were also reduced. In contrast, no difference in pup weights was observed at postpartum days 7 (Control, 11.9±0.5 and L-NNA, 11.3±0.9 g) or 21 (Control, 35.7±1.8 and L-NNA, 38.2±2.2 g). However, litter size was significantly reduced in L-NNA rats compared with controls at postpartum days 7 and 21 (Control, 10.2±0.6 and L-NNA, 6.2±0.7, P<0.01). L-NNA dams allowed to deliver spontaneously did not show any difference in gestational length from control rats.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Maternal and Fetal Effects of L-NNA Administration During Days 7 to 21 of Pregnancy

Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in L-NNA rats at days 17 and 21 of gestation; this difference disappeared postpartum, after the drug had been withdrawn. PRA was reduced in L-NNA rats on days 21 of pregnancy and 7 postpartum. L-NNA treatment suppressed the fall in blood pressure as well as the marked increase in PRA observed normally at day 21. In L-NNA rats, urinary kallikrein activity was significantly reduced on days 11 and 17 of pregnancy, attaining normal values thereafter (Figure 1).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Line graphs show systolic blood pressure, PRA, and urinary kallikrein activity in control rats ({circ}) and in rats that received L-NNA 50 mg · kg-1 · d-1 from days 7 to 21 of pregnancy (•). Values are mean±SEM. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 vs control rats.

At day 21 of pregnancy, rats treated with L-NAME had a rise in blood pressure similar to that of L-NNA rats (128±7.4 mm Hg) and also exhibited reduced fetal weight (5.0±0.2 g). Pregnant rats treated with D-NAME or L-arginine did not exhibit an increase in blood pressure (100±6.1 and 98±3.5 mm Hg, respectively) or a reduction in fetal weight (5.4±0.07 and 5.6±0.05 g, respectively) compared with control rats.

Morphological Study
Representative morphological features of renal sections from control and L-NNA–treated rats are shown in Figure 2, A through H. Tissues from sections 2A through 2F and 2H were obtained at day 21 of pregnancy, whereas section 2G was obtained at postpartum day 7. Figure 2A shows normal glomeruli and tubules from a control pregnant rat. Figure 2B shows a section from an L-NNA rat, depicting dilatation of some tubules and flattening of the tubular epithelium. Kallikrein immunostaining was observed exclusively in the connecting tubule cells of the distal nephron (Figure 2C and 2D) and was reduced in L-NNA rats at both days 17 and 21 of pregnancy (Figure 2D). Comparison of staining intensity was done at a first antibody dilution of 1:5000. Five of 8 control rats exhibited the maximum staining, scoring +++, and 3 had moderate staining (++). Three of 6 L-NNA rats exhibited faint staining, scoring +; 2 had moderate staining, scoring ++; and only 1 had maximum staining (+++). Further dilution of the first antibody showed that the kallikrein staining disappeared in L-NNA kidneys at a dilution of 1:80 000, whereas in control kidneys, it persisted even at a dilution of 1:160 000. Compared with control rats (Figure 2C), the kallikrein-containing cells from L-NNA rats were smaller (Figure 2D), although the cross-sectional area of the cells was not measured. No differences in renin staining were observed; at a dilution of 1:5000, all sections from both groups displayed the maximum intensity and were ranked as +++ (Figure 2E and 2F). Kidneys from L-NNA rats exhibited interstitial cellular inflammatory infiltration, particularly at postpartum day 7. The infiltration was predominantly monocytes-macrophages (ED1+) (Figure 2G). Tubular and glomerular alterations were observed as early as day 11 of pregnancy (4 days with NOS inhibition). At this time, some glomeruli were hypercellular and Bowman's capsule was thickened. These lesions progressed until day 21 of pregnancy, when segmental areas of hyalinization, segmental fibrinoid necrosis of the glomerular tuft, and cellular vacuolization were observed. In addition, intraglomerular mitosis was also observed (Figure 2H). Some tubules exhibited the presence of eosinophilic intraluminal material, as well as thickening of basal membrane, containing PAS-positive material. These changes were decreased at postpartum day 7 and were undetectable at postpartum day 21 (data not shown). Similar alterations were observed with the administration of L-NAME, another inhibitor, and were attenuated with the administration of an excess of L-arginine. Rats treated with D-NAME did not exhibit renal alterations (data not shown).



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Color plate showing representative morphological features of renal sections from control and L-NNA–treated rats, obtained at day 21 of pregnancy (A through F and H) or at postpartum day 7 (G). A and B, Sections from control (A) and L-NNA–treated (B) rats stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Note the atrophy of tubules (**). C and D, Sections from control (C) and L-NNA–treated (D) rats immunostained for kallikrein. Kallikrein is present in connecting tubules (*), which are dilated, atrophic, and with reduced kallikrein staining in L-NNA rats. E and F, Sections from control (E) and L-NNA–treated (F) rats immunostained for renin. Renin is restricted to the afferent arterioles in the vicinity of glomeruli, without evident changes between groups. G, Section from L-NNA rat, showing the presence of abundant monocytes/macrophages, as identified with the specific ED1+ antigen (arrows). H, Intraglomerular mitosis in an L-NNA rat, stained with PAS. Bars in A, B, E, and F=50 µm; in C, D, G, and H=20 µm.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study shows that NOS inhibition in pregnant rats produces a significant reduction in urinary kallikrein activity and in renal kallikrein immunostaining, associated with renal morphological abnormalities, high blood pressure, reduced PRA levels, and reduced fetal weight. These functional and morphological alterations seem to be a consequence of NOS inhibition rather than the effect of L-NAME or L-NNA per se, for several reasons. First, they were observed with the use of 2 different inhibitors (L-NNA and L-NAME); second, they were attenuated with the administration of an excess of substrate (L-arginine); and third, they were not observed when the inactive stereoisomer D-NAME was administered.

An interesting finding of our study is that NOS inhibition in pregnant rats reduced urinary kallikrein activity and renal kallikrein immunostaining. The KKS is known to be activated in normal pregnancy, and reduced urinary kallikrein activity has been demonstrated in pregnant women with fetal growth restriction or preeclampsia,5 6 conditions characterized by a reduced plasma volume expansion and increased total peripheral vascular resistance. The renal KKS seems to participate in complex events such as regulation of blood pressure and control of the extracellular volume, sodium and water excretion, renal vascular resistance, and renin release.19 Several findings provide anatomic and functional frameworks for a role of the KKS in the hemodynamic events in the kidney. Among them, (1) immunohistochemical studies demonstrate an anatomic relationship between kallikrein-containing tubules and the juxtaglomerular apparatus20 21 ; (2) kallikrein is observed in the basolateral membrane of connecting tubule cells,22 and Madin-Darby canine kidney distal tubule cells transfected with rat kallikrein cDNA secrete kallikrein into both the apical and basolateral poles,23 suggesting that renal kallikrein can reach the circulation; and (3) there is evidence for renal kinins as mediators of the amino acid–induced renal hyperperfusion and hyperfiltration in the rat.24 Furthermore, kinins contribute to the control of renin secretion.25

Previous studies have shown that L-NAME partially or completely blocks glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow responses to amino acid infusion in rats, suggesting that NO is a downstream modulator of the actions of kinin on the glomerulus.26 The reduced urinary kallikrein activity observed in the present study may be caused directly by NOS inhibition or may be a consequence of the morphological alterations observed in the connecting tubule cells. In nonpregnant rats, a 3-week treatment with L-NAME increased hepatic kininogen and renal kallikrein mRNA levels.27 In the same study, the use of HOE-140, a bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist, produced a greater rise in blood pressure in L-NAME–treated rats, suggesting that an increased activity of the KKS plays a protective role in this model of hypertension. Several factors may account for this apparently contrasting result. First, in our study we gave the NOS inhibitor for only 2 weeks, a period of time in which no significant changes in the components of the KKS were observed in the study by Chao et al.27 Second, the interaction between the NO-NOS pathway and the KKS may be different in pregnant animals. And third, it cannot be ruled out that the stimulation of the KKS reported in that study27 was caused by the increment in blood pressure, which was >200 mm Hg after 3 weeks of L-NAME treatment and not a direct effect of NOS inhibition. In our study, the highest blood pressure observed was within the normal range for virgin rats (134 mm Hg) and presumably did not activate compensatory mechanisms. We were surprised to find that urinary kallikrein activity was within the normal range on day 21 of pregnancy, despite continuous administration of L-NNA and decreased renal kallikrein immunostaining. Because kallikrein excretion in control pregnant rats had returned toward nonpregnant values, we could speculate that NOS inhibition attenuates the pregnancy-induced rise in kallikrein but has no effect on basal kallikrein. Alternatively, the ratio of active to total kallikrein may have increased to overcome the reduction in renal kallikrein synthesis observed in this model. This possibility was not investigated in the present study. Independently of the mechanism that caused reduced renal kallikrein synthesis, this change may contribute to the rise in blood pressure and the reduction in plasma volume expansion described previously in this model.14

Inhibition of NO formation substantially attenuated the stimulatory effect of pregnancy on PRA. The reduced PRA levels are in keeping with previous studies in pregnancy14 and in nonpregnant conditions.28 29 30 Because L-NNA administration increases blood pressure, thus withdrawing sympathetic activity (both renin inhibitory signals), the lower PRA levels may be an indirect consequence of the hemodynamic changes induced by NOS inhibition. Decreased PRA levels have also been observed in pregnancies associated with reduced plasma volume expansion, such as in idiopathic fetal growth restriction and in preeclampsia.5 6 It is interesting to note that this difference in PRA between the control and L-NNA groups was not accompanied by substantial changes in renal immunostaining at the juxtaglomerular apparatus. This paradox of low PRA levels without apparent changes in renal renin has been described in a model of experimental diabetes31 and can be explained by the fact that the immunohistochemical technique is less sensitive to detecting small changes in renin content than is PRA.

Rats treated with NOS inhibitors during pregnancy exhibited glomerular, tubular, and interstitial abnormalities. Several studies have shown that NOS inhibition causes a marked increase in the number of abnormal glomeruli in pregnant12 15 and in virgin11 32 rats. Here, we report regression of these lesions after drug removal. Renal changes were present as early as day 11 of pregnancy (4 days of L-NNA treatment), before the onset of increased systolic blood pressure. The mechanisms causing renal injury during chronic NO blockade are under discussion. Previous studies have shown that the NO-NOS system controls both the tone of the glomerular afferent arteriole by modulating its myogenic response and the glomerular hemodynamics indirectly through tubuloglomerular feedback and renin release.33 Therefore, renal alterations may be secondary to intrarenal ischemia or glomerular hypertension and seem not to be caused by the increment in maternal systolic blood pressure. Another possible mechanism contributing to renal damage is the presence of infiltrating macrophages, because in some models of glomerulonephritis, local macrophage proliferation has been associated with the progression of glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury.34 However, macrophage infiltration in the present study was a rather late event, observed mainly at postpartum day 7.

In keeping with previous studies, the present results confirm that NOS inhibition during pregnancy reduces fetal and placental weights (for review, see Reference 3535 ). We have proposed that the mechanisms that cause fetal growth restriction are related to an altered maternal vasodilation, which limits plasma volume expansion and, secondarily, reduces cardiac output and uteroplacental blood flow. A direct role of NO deficiency in placental perfusion may also be involved, because it is well known that the placental villous vascular tree has the ability to both generate and respond to NO.36 Thus, chronically inhibiting the release of NO from placental vessels would result in vasoconstriction and reduced blood flow that indirectly contribute to reduced fetal weight. Surviving pups were capable of catch-up growth, probably favored by the reduction in litter size.

Despite the existence of renal morphological abnormalities and reduced levels of PRA and kallikrein excretion, the present results show no significant changes in diuresis, creatinine clearance, and proteinuria after 2-week L-NNA treatment. Although sodium excretion doubled during NOS inhibition, this difference was not statistically significant. The present results are in disagreement with previous ones that demonstrated increased protein excretion and reduced glomerular filtration rate during NOS inhibition in pregnant rats.12 15 A possible explanation for these differences relates to the fact that in our study, pregnant rats exhibited only a moderate increase in systolic blood pressure that was within the normotensive range for virgin rats, whereas in the previous studies, blood pressure reached much higher values (mean arterial blood pressure of 150 mm Hg).12 Presumably these contrasting results are caused by differences in the dose of the inhibitor used and/or in the route of administration (oral versus intravenous infusion).

In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that long-term NOS inhibition during pregnancy causes reduced renal kallikrein synthesis, associated with renal morphological alterations, increased blood pressure, decreased PRA, and reduced fetal weight. We postulate that the reduction in the vasodilator KKS could contribute to the hemodynamic alterations described in this model by interfering with the normal vasodilator response of pregnancy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was partially supported by grant 1.96.0779 from the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Chile), FONDECYT. The excellent technical assistance of María Alcoholado and Carlos Céspedes is gratefully acknowledged.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr Sofía P. Salas, Center for Medical Research, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, PO Box 114-D, Santiago, Chile.

Received June 2, 1999; first decision July 1, 1999; accepted July 28, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Longo LD. Maternal blood volume and cardiac output during pregnancy: a hypothesis of endocrinologic control. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:R720–R729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Wilson M, Morganti AA, Zervoudakis I, Letcher R, Romney B, Von Oeyon P, Papera S, Sealey J, Laragh J. Blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system and sex steroids throughout normal pregnancy. Am J Med. 1980;68:97–104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Schrier RW, Briner VA. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis of sodium and water retention in pregnancy: implications for pathogenesis of preeclampsia-eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:632–639.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Salas SP, Roblero JS, Croxatto HR, Valdés G. Urinary kallikrein activity during rat pregnancy. Arch Biol Med Exp. 1987;20:305–309.

5. Salas SP, Rosso P, Espinoza R, Robert JA, Valdés G, Donoso E. Maternal plasma volume expansion and hormonal changes in women with idiopathic fetal growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:1029–1033.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Salas SP, Rosso P. Plasma volume, renal function, and hormonal levels in pregnant women with idiopathic fetal growth restriction or preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1998;17:69–79.

7. Rosso P, Salas SP, Mechanisms of fetal growth retardation in the underweight mother. In: Allen L, King J, Lönnerdal B, eds. Nutrient Regulation During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Infant Growth. New York, NY:. Plenum Press; 1994:1–9.

8. Conrad KP, Vernier KA. Plasma level, urinary excretion, and metabolic production of cGMP during gestation in rats. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:R847–R853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Conrad KP, Joffe GM, Kruszyna H, Kruszyna R, Rochelle LG, Smith RP, Chavez JE, Mosher MD. Identification of increased nitric oxide biosynthesis during pregnancy in rats. FASEB J. 1993;7:566–571.[Abstract]

10. Sladek SM, Magness RR, Conrad KP. Nitric oxide and pregnancy. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:R441–R463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Baylis C, Mitruka B, Deng A. Chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in the rat produces systemic hypertension and glomerular damage. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:278–281.

12. Molnár M, Sütö T, Tóth T, Hertelendy F. Prolonged blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in gravid rats produces sustained hypertension, proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1458–1466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Yallampalli C, Garfield RE. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis in rats during pregnancy produces signs similar to those of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1316–1320.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Salas SP, Altermatt F, Campos M, Giacaman A, Rosso P. Effects of long-term nitric oxide synthesis inhibition on plasma volume expansion and fetal growth in the pregnant rat. Hypertension. 1995;26:1019–1023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Helmbrecht GD, Farhat MY, Lochbaum L, Brown HE, Yadgarova KT, Eglinton GS, Ramwell PW. L-Arginine reverses the adverse pregnancy changes induced by nitric oxide synthase inhibition in the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:800–805.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Amundsen E, Putter J, Friberger P, Knos M, Larsbraten M, Claeson G. Methods for determination of glandular kallikrein by means of a chromogenic tripeptide substrate. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1979;120:83–95.

17. Velarde V, Humphreys J, Figueroa CD, Vío CP. Postnatal maturation of tissue kallikrein-producing cells (connecting tubule cells) in the rat kidney: a morphometric and immunohistochemical study. Anat Embryol. 1995;192:407–414.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Sternberger LA, Sternberger NH. The unlabeled antibody method: comparison of peroxidase-antiperoxidase with avidin-biotin complex by a new method of quantification. J Histochem Cytochem. 1986;34:599–605.[Abstract]

19. Bhoola KD, Figueroa CD, Worthy K. Bioregulation of kinins: kallikreins, kininogens and kininases. Pharmacol Rev. 1992;44:1–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Barajas L, Powers K, Carretero OA, Scicli AG, Inagami T. Immunocytochemical localization of renin and kallikrein in the rat renal cortex. Kidney Int. 1986;29:965–970.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Vío CP, Figueroa CD, Caorsi I. Anatomical relationship between kallikrein containing tubules and the juxtaglomerular apparatus in the human kidney. Am J Hypertens. 1988;1:269–272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Vío CP, Figueroa CD. Subcellular localization of renal kallikrein by ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. Kidney Int. 1985;28:36–42.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Abe M, Nakamura F, Tan F, Deddish PA, Colley KJ, Becker RP, Skidgel RA, Erdös EG. Expression of rat kallikrein and epithelial polarity in transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Hypertension. 1995;26:891–898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Jaffa AA, Vío CP, Silva RH, Vavrek RJ, Stewart JM, Rust PF. Evidence for renal kinins as mediators of amino acid-induced hyperperfusion and hyperfiltration in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:1460–1468.

25. Bierwaltes WH, Prada J, Carretero OA. Kinin stimulation of renin release in isolated rat glomeruli. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:F757–F761.

26. Tolins JP, Raij L. Effects of amino acid infusion on renal hemodynamics: role of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Hypertension. 1991;17:1045–1051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Chao C, Madeddu P, Wang C, Liang Y, Chao L, Chao J. Differential regulation of kallikrein, kininogen, and kallikrein-binding protein in arterial hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 40)(1 Pt 2):F78–F86.

28. Dananberg J, Sider R, Grekin R. Sustained hypertension induced by orally administered nitro-L-arginine. Hypertension. 1993;21:359–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Schricker K, Hegyi I, Hamann M, Kaissling B, Kurtz A. Tonic stimulation of renin gene expression by nitric oxide is counteracted by tonic inhibition through angiotensin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:8006–8010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Navarro J, Sanchez A, Saíz J, Ruilope LM, García-Están J, Romero JC, Moncada S, Lahera V. Hormonal, renal, and metabolic alterations during hypertension induced by chronic inhibition of NO in rats. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:R1516–R1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Jaffa A, Vío C, Velarde V, LeRoith D, Mayfield R. Induction of renal kallikrein and renin gene expression by insulin and IGF-I in the diabetic rat. Diabetes. 1997;46:2049–2056.[Abstract]

32. Zatz R, Baylis C. Chronic nitric oxide inhibition model six years on. Hypertension. 1998;32:958–964.[Free Full Text]

33. Ito S, Carretero O, Abe K. Nitric oxide in the regulation of renal blood flow. New Horiz. 1995;3:615–623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Lan H, Nikolic-Paterson D, Mu W, Atkins R. Local macrophage proliferation in the progression of glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury in rat anti-GBM glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1995;48:753–760.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Salas SP. Role of nitric oxide in maternal hemodynamics and hormonal changes in pregnant rats. Biol Res. 1998;31:243–250.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Myatt L, Brewer A, Brockman DE. The action of nitric oxide in the perfused human fetal-placental circulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:687–692.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. P. Salas, A. Giacaman, W. Romero, P. Downey, E. Aranda, D. Mezzano, and C. P. Vio
Pregnant Rats Treated With a Serotonin Precursor Have Reduced Fetal Weight and Lower Plasma Volume and Kallikrein Levels
Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 773 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. P. Basile, K. Fredrich, M. Alausa, C. P. Vio, M. Liang, M. R. Rieder, A. S. Greene, and A. W. Cowley Jr.
Identification of persistently altered gene expression in the kidney after functional recovery from ischemic acute renal failure
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): F953 - F963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. P. Salas, A. Giacaman, and C. P. Vio
Renal and Hormonal Effects of Water Deprivation in Late-Term Pregnant Rats
Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 334 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. P. Salas, A. Giacaman, and C. P. Vio
Pregnant Rats With 5/6 Nephrectomy Have Normal Volume Expansion Despite Lower Renin and Kallikrein
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 744 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S.-I. Suga, M. I. Phillips, P. E. Ray, J. A. Raleigh, C. P. Vio, Y.-G. Kim, M. Mazzali, K. L. Gordon, J. Hughes, and R. J. Johnson
Hypokalemia induces renal injury and alterations in vasoactive mediators that favor salt sensitivity
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F620 - F629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salas, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vío, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salas, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vío, C. P.