(Hypertension. 1999;34:1106-1111.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Cardiologia (S.C.) and Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Unità di Medicina Nucleare (G. La C.), Università di Firenze, and Istituto di Gerontologia e Geriatria, Università di Firenze e Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze (A.U., C.C., C. Di S., B.V., A.A., G.M.), Italy.
Correspondence to Sergio Castellani, MD, Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Cardiologia, Viale Morgagni 85, Firenze 50134, Italy. E-mail castellani s{at}cesit1.unifi.its@cesit1.unifi.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: elderly hypertension, isolated systolic renal circulation endothelin prostaglandins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure was
<90 mm Hg.15 Pseudohypertension was ruled out by
the Osler maneuver.16 Orthostatic hypotension
was excluded by the method described by Lyem et al.17
Subjects with cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms, as assessed
by the MiniMental State Examination 18 and the Geriatric
Depression Scale,19 respectively, were excluded from
the study. Scores of >24 for the MiniMental State Examination and <12 for the Geriatric Depression Scale were necessary for admission to the study. No aspirin or any other cyclooxygenase-inhibiting drug had been taken for at least 15 days before the beginning of the study. If patients were under treatment, treatment was discontinued for 2 weeks before the start of the study.
Preliminary Experiments
A preliminary 2-hour experiment in 5 young healthy subjects and
5 elderly subjects was performed to verify the stability and the
reproducibility of the measurement of effective renal plasma flow
(ERPF), GFR, blood pressure, and heart rate. In this preliminary study,
all conditions were the same as in the experimental study except that
mental stress was not applied. In this study, blood pressure, heart
rate, ERPF, and GFR were all steady.
Study protocol, mental stress, systemic and renal
hemodynamics, urinary prostaglandins
(prostaglandin [PG]E2,
PGF2
, 6-keto-PGF1
),
thromboxane B2
(TXB2), endothelin, cGMP, plasma renin activity,
plasma catecholamines, and urinary electrolytes assay have
been described elsewhere.20
Statistical Analysis
All results are presented as mean±SD. Students
t test for independent samples was used to compare the mean
baseline values of the 2 groups. The effects induced by mental stress
on each variable were evaluated according to a 2-step statistical
analysis: first, an ANOVA for repeated measures was used to
evaluate the variations among time periods; second, a post hoc test
(least significant difference) was used to detect the
differences of values at different times versus baseline. The
difference in the curves between the 2 groups during the experimental
period was tested by 2-way MANOVA with multiple comparisons.
Significance level was set at 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects of Mental Stress
In the elderly with ISH, as well as in the elderly normotensive
subjects, mental stress induced an increase of blood pressure and heart
rate that was detected only during the administration of the stimulus,
without significant difference between the 2 groups (MANOVA). Figure 1 describes the course of the blood
pressure. Patients with ISH showed a peak increase of 31 mm Hg in
systolic blood pressure, whereas elderly normotensives
exhibited a peak increase of 29 mm Hg (+14% and +17%,
respectively; P<0.0001 versus baseline for each group).
Heart rate rose significantly in both groups during mental stress, with
a 15.5% increase at peak in patients with ISH (72.7±9.9 versus
62.5±6.9 bpm versus baseline; P<0.0001) and a 12.4%
increase in elderly normotensives (71.4±6.0 versus 63.5±3.3 bpm
versus baseline; P<0.05).
|
In patients with ISH, as in elderly normotensives, norepinephrine and epinephrine increased only during mental stress (Table 2). Plasma renin activity remained unchanged during the whole experimental period in the ISH group, whereas plasma renin activity decreased during the recovery periods in elderly normotensives (Table 2).
|
Patients with ISH exhibited mental stressinduced changes in renal hemodynamics that were opposite those in elderly normotensives. In the ISH group, mental stress induced an increase in both ERPF and GFR during the administration of the stimulus (+42% and +29%, respectively; P<0.01 for both) and during the first recovery period (+30% and +21%, respectively, versus baseline; P<0.05 for both) (Figure 2), without any change in filtration fraction. Hence, renal resistance dropped until the end of the experiment (-42%, P<0.0001 during mental stress; -20%, P<0.02 during recovery period I; -16%, P<0.05 during recovery period II versus baseline). Conversely, in elderly normotensives, mental stress caused a prolonged vasoconstriction: ERPF dropped during mental stress (-20%; P<0.05) and reached its minimum value during the second recovery period (-33%; P<0.01 versus baseline). In normotensives, GFR remained constant throughout the whole experiment (Figure 2).
|
Throughout the whole experiment, in patients with ISH no significant
variations were found in either urinary endothelin-1 or urinary
eicosanoid excretion (Figure 3), except
for TXB2. Urinary TXB2
excretion significantly dropped in ISH patients (Table 3). This behavior was sharply different
from the variations observed in elderly normotensives, in whom urinary
endothelin-1 increased during mental stress and recovery period I
(+50% and +25%, respectively, versus baseline; P<0.05 for
both) and urinary PGE2, urinary
6-keto-PGF1
, and PGF2
increased during mental stress (+54%, +49%, and +53%, respectively;
P<0.05 for each parameter), while
TXB2 remained unchanged (Figure 3 and
Table 3).
|
|
In ISH patients, UcGMP did not vary throughout the whole experiment; on the contrary, in elderly normotensives it rose significantly during mental stress (41.9±23.4 versus 26.4±10.0 pmol/ERPF during baseline; P<0.05) and subsequently dropped to prestress values by the first recovery period (Figure 3).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under baseline conditions, renal hemodynamics of ISH patients do not differ from those of elderly normotensives.12 Glomerular hyperfiltration is present in both groups, as demonstrated by the high values of filtration fraction compared with values previously reported in young subjects.12 20 Our data indicate that the filtration fraction increases in the elderly because the decrease in GFR is proportionally smaller than in the ERPF. This hemodynamic pattern may already carry an increased risk of renal damage.21 The autocrine patterns of the 2 groups at baseline were also alike. Indeed, in both hypertensive and normotensive elderly subjects, the renal formation of endothelin-1 and PGE2 was greater than in younger normotensives.12 Most probably, this hemodynamic and neurohumoral pattern constitutes an adaptive mechanism to the reduced oxygen supply of those nephrons that undergo progressive nephrosclerotic changes. This condition stimulates endothelin-1 and PGE2 production,22 23 with resulting overperfusion of the remnant units that exhibit hyperfiltration.
Notwithstanding the similarities in baseline renal hemodynamics, we detected major differences between normotensive and hypertensive subjects in their response to mental stress. In both groups the stimulus caused similar increases in circulating catecholamines, heart rate, and blood pressure, and the mean blood pressure changes were always within the range of renal autoregulation.24 Conversely, with a similar systemic response to stress, renal response in patients with ISH was markedly altered in respect to the response observed in physiological senescence, since the kidney responds to mental stress with vasodilatation, as evidenced by the increase in ERPF. The variations in GFR paralleled the modifications in ERPF, leaving the filtration fraction virtually unchanged. Such response was in sharp contrast to the vasoconstrictive reaction induced by adrenergic stimulation in both young and elderly healthy normotensives.12 20 The usual reaction of a healthy subject to a moderate adrenergic stimulation is renal vasoconstriction, which prevents the transmission to the glomerulus of high pressure values attained in the systemic vascular bed, with simultaneous rise of the renal release of endothelial factors that may modify renal hemodynamics (ie, endothelin-1, PGE2).12 20 In these subjects, the observed increase in cGMP could mean nitric oxide stimulation, even if we did not measure plasma atrial natriuretic factor variations. However, in these experimental conditions, atrial natriuretic factor activation seems unlikely because adrenergic activation is not an effective stimulus25 26 and there is no change in circulating volume. In ISH patients, during stress-induced renal vasodilatation, the release of the different autacoids did not increase. This reflects the impaired responsiveness of renal vascular endothelium to sympathetic activation. In particular, the association of a defect in endothelin reactivity to sympathetic stimulation with a lack of renal adaptation may support a role of the peptide in the renal vasoconstriction and thus in the mechanisms that protect the kidney against systemic blood pressure increase. The decrease in urinary TXB2 observed in ISH patients could contribute to renal vasodilatation even if its role, according to the literature, is probably not very relevant. In fact, several studies have failed to provide any evidence that renal TXB2 has a role in renal hemodynamic response, and in particular its selective inhibition has not led to an increase in GFR or ERPF in either humans or animals.27 28 The role of renal angiotensin in the impaired renal response to stress cannot be ruled out by our data; nevertheless, Schmieder et al29 found no difference in renal response to mental stress after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor administration. An alternative explanation of renal vasodilatation during stress could be a defect in catecholamine release or a lack in renal response to norepinephrine. In animal experiments, however, it has been recently demonstrated that ganglionic blockade has a very negligible effect on renal hemodynamics under physiological conditions.30
In conclusion, this inertia of renal vascular bed probably accounts for the fact that patients with ISH are more prone to develop end-stage renal disease.7 8 9 The glomerulus, which already exhibits hyperfiltration under basal conditions, is repeatedly exposed to the injury brought about by any further elevations of systemic arterial blood pressure occurring in everyday life, because the pressure increase is not outbalanced by renal adaptation capacity. This is particularly relevant in the elderly, in whom systolic blood pressure variability is greater than in adult patients.31 This hemodynamic pattern may lead to glomerulosclerosis over a period of time.21 The data of our study strongly support the view that ISH should be treated like other forms of hypertension not only to prevent cardiovascular mortality3 4 5 but also to prevent renal damage and/or end-organ failure. Further studies will be necessary to identify the antihypertensive drugs with the highest renal protective power.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
antisera. We would also like to thank
Professor Bernard Peskar (Department of Pharmacology, Bochum
University, Germany) for providing the antiserum to
6-keto-PGF1
and Professor Luciano Caprino
(Istituto di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma,
Italy) for providing TXB2 antiserum. Received March 23, 1999; first decision May 12, 1999; accepted July 13, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Black HR. New concepts in hypertension: focus on the elderly. Am Heart J. 1998;135:S2S7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
ODonnel CJ, Ridker PM, Glynn RJ, Berger K, Ajany U,
Manson JE, Hennekens CH. Hypertension and borderline isolated
systolic hypertension increase risks of
cardiovascular disease and mortality in male
physicians. Circulation. 1997;95:11321137.
4.
Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a
cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment.
JAMA. 1996;275:15711576.
5.
SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke
by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated
systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic
Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA. 1991;265:32553264.
6. Ming J, Sheng LL, Zhang LG, Ren QD, Xueyan C, Fen ZJ, Ru FS, Ling WS. Abnormal renal function in isolated systolic hypertension: correlation with ambulatory blood pressure. Int J Cardiol. 1993;41:6975.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Randall BL, Neaton JD, Brancati
FL, Ford GE, Shulmann MB, Stamler J. A prospective study of blood
pressure and incidence of end stage renal disease in 332,544 men.
N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1318.
8. Whelton PK, He J, Perneger TV, Klag MJ. Kidney damage in "benign" essential hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1997;6:177183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Salem MM. Hypertension in the hemodialysis population: a survey of 649 patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:461468.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Weisstuch JM, Dworkin LD. Does essential hypertension cause end-stage renal disease? Kidney Int. 1992;41:S33S37.
11. Bauer JH, Reams GP. Do calcium antagonists protect the human hypertension kidney? Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:173S178S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Castellani S, Ungar A, Cantini C, La Cava G, Coppo M, Di Serio C, Altobelli A, Brocchi A, Camaiti A, Vallotti B, Messeri G, Meldolesi U, Masotti G. Excessive vasoconstriction after stress by the aging kidney: inadequate prostaglandin modulation of increased endothelin activity. J Lab Clin Med. 1998;132:186194.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Patrono C, Wennmalm A, Ciabattoni G, Nowak J, Pugliese F, Cinotti G. Evidence for an extrarenal origin of urinary prostaglandin E2 in healthy men. Prostaglandins. 1979;18:623629.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:24132446.
15. Black DM, Brand RJ, Greenlick M, Hughes G, Smith J, for the SHEP Pilot Research Group. Compliance to treatment for hypertension in elderly patients: the SHEP Pilot Study. J Gerontol. 1987;42:552557.
16. Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Amodeo C. Oslers maneuver and pseudohypertension. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:15481551.[Abstract]
17. Lyem M, Vargas E, Faragher EB, Davies I, Goddard C. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses in elderly patients with postural hypotension. Eur J Clin Invest. 1990;20:9096.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189198.
19. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Ceirer O. Development and validation of a geriatric depression scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17:3749.
20. Castellani S, Ungar A, La Cava G, Cantini C, Stefanile C, Camaiti A, Messeri G, Coppo M, Vallotti B, Di Serio C, Brocchi A, Masotti G. Renal adaptation to stress: a possible role of endothelin release and prostaglandin modulation in the human subject. J Lab Clin Med. 1997;129:462469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hostetter TH, Olson JL, Rennke HG, Venkatachalam MA,
Brenner BM. Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse
response to renal ablation. Am J Physiol. 1981;241:F85F93.
22. Ritthaler T, Gopfert T, Firth JD, Ratcliffe PJ, Kramer BK, Kurtz A. Influence of hypoxia on hepatic and renal endothelin gene expression. Pflugers Arch. 1996;431:587593.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. McGiff JC, Crowshaw K, Terragno NA, Lonigro AJ, Strand JD, Williamson MA, Lee JB. Prostaglandin-like substances appearing in canine renal venous blood during renal ischemia. Circ Res. 1970;27:6566.
24. Shipley RE, Study RS. Changes in renal blood flow, extraction of inulin, GFR, tissue pressure and urine flow with acute alterations of renal artery pressure. Am J Physiol. 1951;167:676688.
25. Schmedtje JF Jr, Varghese A, Gutkowska J, Taylor AA. Correlation of plasma norepinephrine and plasma atrial natriuretic factor during lower body negative pressure. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990;61:555558.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Tanaka S, Sagawa S, Miki K, Claybaugh JR, Shiraki K.
Changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity and renal function during
positive-pressure breathing in humans. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1220R1228.
27. Weir MR, Klassen DK, Hoover D, Douglas FL. Preliminary observations of the acute effects of selective serum thromboxane inhibition and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in hypertensive humans. J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;29:11081116.[Abstract]
28. Hably C, Gyovary Z, Bartha J. Changes of organ blood flow and cardiac output after imidazole administration. Acta Physiol Hung. 1994;82:163173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Schmieder RE, Schobel HP, Gatzka CE, Hauser W, Dominiak P, Mann JFE, Luft FC. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on renal haemodynamics during mental stress. J Hypertens. 1996;14:12011207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Just A, Wittmann U, Ehmke H, Kirchheim HR.
Autoregulation of renal blood flow in the conscious dog and the
contribution of the tubuloglomerular feedback.
J Physiol. 1998;506:275290.
31. Zito M, Parati G, Omboni S, Cervone C, Ulian L, Abate G, Mancia G. Effect of aging on blood pressure variability. J Hypertens. 1991;9(suppl 6):S328S332.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Castellani, M. Bacci, A. Ungar, P. Prati, C. Di Serio, P. Geppetti, G. Masotti, G. G. Neri Serneri, and G. F. Gensini Abnormal Pressure Passive Dilatation of Cerebral Arterioles in the Elderly With Isolated Systolic Hypertension Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Grisk and R. Rettig Interactions between the sympathetic nervous system and the kidneys in arterial hypertension Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2004; 61(2): 238 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |