Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1999;34:1197-1201

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Massart, P.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Wibo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Massart, P.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Wibo, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARVEDILOL
*LABETALOL

(Hypertension. 1999;34:1197.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Carvedilol and Lacidipine Prevent Cardiac Hypertrophy and Endothelin-1 Gene Overexpression After Aortic Banding

Pierre-Emmanuel Massart; Julian Donckier; Jan Kyselovic; Théophile Godfraind; Guy R. Heyndrickx; Maurice Wibo

From the Departments of Cardiovascular Physiology (P-E.M., G.R.H.) and Experimental Pharmacology (J.K., T.G., M.W.), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels; and the Division of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine (J.D.), University Hospital of Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium.

Correspondence to Prof Maurice Wibo, Université Catholique de Louvain, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, UCL 54.10, Ave Hippocrate 54, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail wibo{at}farl.ucl.ac.be


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Carvedilol and lacidipine have been shown to exert cardioprotective effects in rat models of chronic hypertension. We investigated their effects in an acute model of pressure overload produced by suprarenal aortic constriction, in which enhanced myocardial production of endothelin-1 could play a crucial role. In the absence of drug treatment, after 1 week, aortic banding provoked an increase in carotid pressure associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (29%; P<0.01). These changes were accompanied by increased myocardial expression of preproendothelin-1 (2.5 times; P<0.05) and skeletal {alpha}-actin (3.6 times; P<0.05), but the expression of cardiac {alpha}-actin was not modified. Oral administration of carvedilol at a dose of 30 mg · kg-1 · d-1 to rats with aortic banding normalized carotid pressure and left ventricular weight as well as preproendothelin-1 and skeletal {alpha}-actin gene expression. Carvedilol at a lower dose (7.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1) and lacidipine 1 mg · kg-1 · d-1 had only moderate and nonsignificant effects on carotid pressure but largely prevented left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.01) and preproendothelin-1 overexpression (P<0.05). Labetalol (60 mg · kg-1 · d-1) tended to exert similar effects but insignificantly. These results show that the antihypertrophic properties of carvedilol and lacidipine are partly independent of their antihypertensive effects and may be related to their ability to blunt myocardial preproendothelin-1 overexpression. Moreover, carvedilol at a dose of 7.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1 did not prevent myocardial overexpression of skeletal {alpha}-actin, which suggests that, in this model, reexpression of a fetal gene can be activated by pressure overload independently of cardiac hypertrophy.


Key Words: endothelin • hypertrophy, left ventricular • hypertension, experimental • {alpha}-actin • carvedilol • lacidipine


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by endothelial cells,1 is endowed with remarkable growth-promoting properties. In cultured neonatal cardiac myocytes, ET-1 induces hypertrophy,2 3 whereas other stimuli, such as mechanical stretch or angiotensin II (Ang II), may evoke hypertrophic growth by increasing ET-1 biosynthesis.4 5 ET-1 has also been shown to play an important role in some in vivo models of cardiac hypertrophy. ET-1 receptor antagonists prevent, at least transiently, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy evoked by suprarenal aortic banding.6 ET-1 receptor blockade has been reported to attenuate cardiac hypertrophy in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) fed a high-salt diet,7 8 in uninephrectomized rats receiving deoxycorticosterone acetate and a high-salt diet,9 10 in renovascular hypertensive rats,11 and in rats infused with Ang II12 or norepinephrine.13

Carvedilol is a nonselective, vasodilating ß-blocker with potent antioxidant and free radical–scavenging properties14 that is used in the treatment of hypertension, angina, and congestive heart failure.15 Unlike other ß-blockers, carvedilol reduces ET-1 biosynthesis in cultured endothelial cells.16 17 Recently, carvedilol, at doses that do not reduce systemic blood pressure, has been reported to prevent cardiac growth and remodeling in SHRSP maintained on 1% NaCl drinking solution and high-fat diet.18 In SHRSP, the calcium channel blocker lacidipine also prevents salt-dependent cardiac hypertrophy at doses that only minimally affect hypertension, and this effect could be related to a concomitant reduction in myocardial levels of preproendothelin-1 (preproET-1) mRNA.19 20 The present study was therefore conducted to investigate the effects of carvedilol and lacidipine on LV growth and preproET-1 gene expression in rats subjected to hemodynamic overload produced by suprarenal aortic constriction, a model of LV hypertrophy in which myocardial ET-1 appears to play a key role, at least in the acute stage.6 21 Rats subjected to aortic banding and treated with labetalol were included in this study, because this drug shares with carvedilol the property to inhibit both {alpha}- and ß-adrenoceptors.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Animals
All procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines. Sixty Sprague-Dawley male rats (OFA, Iffa Credo, L’arbresle, France) weighing 240 to 260 g were divided randomly into 6 groups: control (sham-operated) rats (sham); rats with aortic banding that received ordinary food (AOB); and 4 groups of rats with aortic banding that received ordinary food mixed with one of the following: a high dose (mean daily intake, 30 mg · kg-1) of carvedilol (CARhd), a low dose (7.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1) of carvedilol (CARld), lacidipine (LACI; 1 mg · kg-1 · d-1), or labetalol (LABE; 60 mg · kg-1 · d-1). Aortic constriction was performed as initially described by Jouannot and Hatt,22 with minor modifications. Briefly, animals were anesthetized with 2,2,2-tribromoethanol (Sigma Chemical Co) at a dose of 0.025 g/100 g body wt. Under sterile conditions, the abdominal aorta was exposed through a midline abdominal incision and constricted at the suprarenal level using a 25-gauge needle (outside diameter, 0.5 mm) to establish the diameter of ligature. A similar procedure was performed for sham except for the ligature. Drug treatment was started 1 day before surgery, and the daily intake of drug-containing food was monitored. One week after surgery, animals were anesthetized with 2,2,2-tribromoethanol, the right carotid and femoral arteries were cannulated with a polyethylene catheter connected to a Statham transducer (P23, Gould Inc) and the mean carotid and femoral arterial pressures were measured. Thereafter, blood samples were collected and animals were killed by exsanguination. Hearts were rinsed with cold Krebs solution, and left ventricles (including interventricular septum) and right ventricular free walls were collected separately, weighed, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Plasma Immunoreactive ET-1 and Plasma Renin Activity
Plasma ET-1 was extracted using Sep-Pack C18 cartridges (Waters Associates) and measured by radioimmunoassay, as previously reported.23 Plasma renin activity (PRA) was measured according to a standard procedure (Medix Biochemica). Because anesthesia and arterial pressure measurement evoke elevation of PRA (reference 2424 and data not shown), care was taken to collect blood samples under strictly comparable conditions.

Isolation of mRNA and Northern Blot Analysis
mRNA (polyA+ RNA) was isolated from frozen ventricles ground in liquid nitrogen with the use of a commercially available kit (Fast Track 2.0 kit, Invitrogen). Samples of 5 to 10 µg of polyA+ RNA were analyzed by Northern blotting with either cDNA probes (preproET-1 and GAPDH) or synthetic oligonucleotide probes (skeletal and cardiac {alpha}-actin) labeled with 32P, as described previously.20 Radioactive spots were detected and quantified by means of the Cyclone storage phosphor system (Packard Instrument), and they were also visualized on autoradiographic film. Amounts of mRNA species were expressed relatively to GADPH mRNA, which was taken as internal reference, to correct for differences in RNA loading or transfer. In each Northern blotting experiment, results were normalized with respect to sham.

Statistical Methods
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Differences between groups were assessed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Rank correlation coefficients (rs) were determined and evaluated by the Spearman test. Probability values <0.05 were considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Biometric and Hemodynamic Data and Plasma Levels of Renin and ET-1
In the absence of drug treatment, mean carotid pressure and carotid-femoral pressure gradient were markedly increased at 7 days after aortic banding (Table; P<0.005, AOB versus sham). Heart rate was somewhat lower in AOB than in sham (P<0.05). The average LV/body weight ratio was increased by 29% in AOB (P<0.005), whereas the right ventricular weight was not significantly modified (not shown). Aortic banding was also associated with higher PRA and plasma ET-1 levels at 7 days (P<0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Biometric and Hemodynamic Data and Plasma Levels of Renin and ET-1

In rats with aortic banding that received carvedilol 30 mg · kg-1 · d-1 (CARhd), mean carotid pressure was totally normalized (P<0.005 versus AOB) and heart rate was significantly lowered (P<0.05). The increase in LV/body wt ratio was almost completely prevented by the high dosage of carvedilol (P<0.005) and the rise in plasma ET-1 and PRA was abolished (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively).

Carvedilol at a lower dose (7.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1) and lacidipine (1 mg · kg-1 · d-1) were almost as effective as carvedilol 30 mg · kg-1 · d-1 for prevention of the increase in LV/body wt ratio induced by aortic banding (P<0.01). However, low-dose carvedilol and lacidipine showed only moderate effects on hemodynamic changes, which did not reach significance. These drug treatments reduced PRA values (P<0.05) and also slightly reduced plasma ET-1 levels.

The LV/body wt ratio of LABE was intermediate between those of sham and AOB, and the mean value of LABE was significantly different from that of sham (P<0.05), but not from that of AOB. Thus, the antihypertrophic effect of labetalol was somewhat lower than that of low-dose carvedilol. Despite this, the hemodynamic changes evoked by labetalol as well as its effects on plasma levels of renin and ET-1 tended to be greater than those evoked by low-dose carvedilol.

Myocardial Levels of PreproET-1 and {alpha}-Actin mRNA
As illustrated in Figures 1A and 2A, myocardial levels of preproET-1 mRNA were on an average 2.5-fold higher in AOB than in sham (P<0.005). This overexpression was almost totally abolished by high-dose carvedilol (P<0.01; CARhd versus AOB) and was prevented to a considerable extent by low-dose carvedilol and lacidipine (both P<0.05), whereas the effect of labetalol was smaller and did not reach significance. Myocardial levels of skeletal and cardiac {alpha}-actin mRNA are shown in Figures 1B and 2B. The cardiac isoform was similarly expressed in the various groups. In contrast, the expression of the skeletal isoform was increased 3.6-fold in AOB compared with sham (P<0.005). This increase was almost totally prevented by high-dose carvedilol (P<0.05) and partially prevented by lacidipine (P<0.05), but it was modified by neither low-dose carvedilol nor labetalol.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Northern blot analysis of preproET-1 and skeletal {alpha}-actin mRNA levels in left ventricle: typical autoradiograms. Blots were first probed for preproET-1 (A) or skeletal {alpha}-actin (B) and then reprobed for GAPDH. Sizes of the labeled mRNA species were (in kb) preproET-1, 2.3; skeletal {alpha}-actin, 1.7; and GAPDH, 1.3.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph showing results of Northern blot analysis of preproET-1 and {alpha}-actin mRNA levels in left ventricle. PreproET-1 (A), skeletal {alpha}-actin (B, filled columns), and cardiac {alpha}-actin (B, empty columns) mRNA levels were corrected for GAPDH mRNA levels and normalized with respect to sham (see Methods). Values are mean±SEM (vertical bars) from 7 to 10 rats. *P<0.05 vs AOB; **P<0.01 vs AOB.

Correlation Among LV Weight, Mean Carotid Pressure, and mRNA Levels
As illustrated in Figure 3, which shows data from the (drug-treated and untreated) animals with aortic banding, a significant correlation was found between preproET-1 mRNA levels and LV/body wt ratio on the one hand (Figure 3A; rs=0.43, P<0.01) and between skeletal {alpha}-actin mRNA levels and mean carotid pressure on the other (Figure 3B; rs=0.65, P<0.0001). In contrast, no correlation was detected between preproET-1 mRNA and mean carotid pressure or between skeletal {alpha}-actin mRNA and LV/body wt ratio.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Correlation between preproET-1 mRNA level and LV weight (A; rs=0.43, P<0.01) and between skeletal {alpha}-actin mRNA level and mean carotid pressure (B; rs=0.65, P<0.0001) in rats with aortic banding (with or without drug treatment).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In agreement with previous studies,6 21 25 we found that pressure overload induced by suprarenal aortic constriction evoked LV hypertrophy, reexpression of a fetal gene, and preproET-1 overexpression. Increased myocardial levels of preproET-1 mRNA as well as increased plasma levels of ET-1 were observed at 7 days after aortic banding, in line with previous reports.21 25 Myocardial preproET-1 overexpression was no longer detectable at 2 weeks, whereas LV hypertrophy and increased expression of skeletal {alpha}-actin did not decrease (data not shown). Ito et al6 reported that plasma levels of ET-1 and preproET-1 mRNA levels in LV were maximally increased at 1 day after aortic banding and returned to normal values at 4 days, whereas LV hypertrophy and enhanced expression of fetal genes persisted at 2 weeks. Thus, LV ET-1 overexpression is an early and transient event in this model of acute pressure overload as well as in ventricular hypertrophy induced by norepinephrine infusion in vivo.13 The earlier normalization of LV preproET-1 mRNA levels in the experiments of Ito et al6 might be linked to a lower degree of LV hypertrophy (17% increase in LV/body wt ratio at 7 days versus 29% in our study).

ET-1 is considered to play a crucial role at an early stage in acute models of cardiac hypertrophy, essentially because selective inhibitors of ET-1 receptors are able to prevent, at least transiently, LV growth in these models in the absence of any significant effect on aortic pressure.6 11 Similarly, we show here that low-dose carvedilol and lacidipine had only moderate and nonsignificant effects on mean carotid pressure but abolished the rise in LV weight (Table) and the increase in LV preproET-1 gene expression (Figure 2). Moreover, taking into account the data that we obtained from all rats with aortic banding, LV weight at 7 days correlated with LV preproET-1 mRNA level (Figure 3A) but not with mean carotid pressure. Thus, in this experimental model, low-dose carvedilol and lacidipine could inhibit myocardial growth primarily by blunting myocardial overexpression of preproET-1 rather than by reducing hemodynamic stress. Regarding the action of lacidipine, this drug has been shown previously to prevent salt-dependent LV hypertrophy and preproET-1 overexpression in SHRSP while producing a limited reduction in high blood pressure.19 20

Besides ET-1, Ang II is considered to be an important mediator of cardiac remodeling evoked by mechanical stress.26 As reported by Baker et al,27 administration of enalapril to rats with aortic banding completely prevents the increase in LV mass at 7 and 15 days, although carotid artery pressure is not reduced. Similar protective effects can be obtained with an antagonist of Ang II receptors.28 In vitro studies indicate that Ang II may promote cardiomyocyte hypertrophy partly through ET-14 and point to the possible importance of interactions between different types of cardiac cells in this respect.29 30 31 Our finding of higher PRA values at 7 days after aortic constriction is in accordance with the view that the renin-angiotensin system might be involved at early stages in pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy. Increased circulating or locally produced Ang II could stimulate cardiac growth mainly by enhancing myocardial production of ET-1, because during that period, blockade of ET-1 receptors can suppress LV growth without reducing hemodynamic load.6 Given that carvedilol and lacidipine decreased PRA in rats with aortic banding, it is possible that these drugs lowered myocardial Ang II levels by this mechanism and thereby prevented LV preproET-1 overexpression and hypertrophy. However, labetalol was as effective as low-dose carvedilol and lacidipine for reducing PRA but was less effective for preventing LV hypertrophy (Table) and preproET-1 overexpression (Figure 2A). This suggests that the capacity to lower PRA is not the only factor responsible for the antihypertrophic effect in this model and that carvedilol and lacidipine have additional mechanisms of action at the myocardial level to inhibit preproET-1 overexpression.

In cultured endothelial cells, carvedilol, unlike other ß-blockers, inhibits ET-1 biosynthesis, and this effect seems to be related to its potent antioxidant properties.16 17 A similar mode of action might be proposed for carvedilol in the present experiments, because there is evidence of increased superoxide anion production by endothelial cells after aortic banding,32 and of increased ET-1 production stimulated by free radicals in myocardium.33 Further experiments are needed to test this hypothesis in a specific manner. Lacidipine might reduce endothelial ET-1 production by a similar mechanism, because this drug is considered to be the most potent antioxidant among the calcium channel blockers.34 35 Elevation of intracellular Ca2+ is required for stimulation of preproET-1 gene expression by agents such as thrombin or Ang II in cultured endothelial cells, but the L-type channel blocker nicardipine does not inhibit basal or stimulated ET-1 biosynthesis in these cells,16 36 37 which are apparently devoid of L-type calcium channels.38 Further work is clearly required to assess the effect of carvedilol and lacidipine on ET-1 production by isolated cardiac cells, especially cardiomyocytes, in which enhanced production of ET-1 has been detected 8 days after aortic banding.25

As noted by Izumo et al,39 the time course of skeletal {alpha}-actin gene expression after aortic constriction coincides with that of increased wall stress and hypertrophic growth response. Although low-dose carvedilol (7.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1) prevented myocardial hypertrophy and preproET-1 overexpression provoked by aortic banding, it did not lessen reexpression of skeletal {alpha}-actin (Figure 2). Because low-dose carvedilol did not reduce carotid pressure (Table), these results suggest that the expression of skeletal {alpha}-actin gene can be activated by pressure overload even when the hypertrophic growth response is blunted by carvedilol. The good correlation that is observed between skeletal {alpha}-actin mRNA levels and carotid pressure in rats with aortic banding (Figure 3) is in agreement with this conclusion. Similarly, in rats subjected to left renal artery clipping with saline administration,11 treatment with an ET-1 receptor antagonist markedly blunted the development of LV hypertrophy by day 10, whereas it did not influence upregulation of atrial natriuretic peptide and ß-myosin heavy chain gene expression at the same time. The reasons that carvedilol and possibly lacidipine are less effective for inhibition of the activation of skeletal {alpha}-actin gene induced by pressure overload than preproET-1 overexpression remain to be elucidated.

In conclusion, the present study shows that carvedilol and lacidipine are endowed with cardiac antihypertrophic properties that are partially independent of their antihypertensive effect and appear to be related to their capacity to decrease myocardial preproET-1 overexpression induced by pressure overload.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Communauté française de Belgique (Action de recherche concertée No. 96/01-199), from the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FRSM No. 3.4572.96), and awards from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi. We thank Boehringer Mannheim for providing carvedilol and Glaxo-Wellcome for providing labetalol and lacidipine. The skillful assistance of Marie-Christine Hamaide, Margareta Leonardy-Vandenberg, Danielle Ochrymowicz-Bemelmans, and François Vanlinden is gratefully acknowledged.

Received May 10, 1999; first decision May 28, 1999; accepted July 22, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411–415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Shubeita HE, McDonough PM, Harris AN, Knowlton KU, Glembotski CC, Brown JH, Chien KR. Endothelin induction of inositol phospholipid hydrolysis, sarcomere assembly, and cardiac gene expression in ventricular myocytes: a paracrine mechanism for myocardial cell hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:20555–20562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ito H, Hirata Y, Hiroe M, Tsujino M, Adachi S, Takamoto T, Nitta M, Taniguchi K, Marumo F. Endothelin-1 induces hypertrophy with enhanced expression of muscle-specific genes in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 1991;69:209–215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ito H, Hirata Y, Adachi S, Tanaka M, Tsujino M, Koike A, Nogami A, Marumo F, Hiroe M. Endothelin-1 is an autocrine/paracrine factor in the mechanism of angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in cultured rat cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:398–403.
  5. Yamazaki T, Komuro I, Kudoh S, Zou Y, Shiojima I, Hiroi Y, Mizuno T, Maemura K, Kurihara H, Aikawa R, Takano H, Yazaki Y. Endothelin-1 is involved in mechanical stress-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3221–3228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ito H, Hiroe M, Hirata Y, Fujisaki H, Adachi S, Akimoto H, Ohta Y, Marumo F. Endothelin ETA receptor antagonist blocks cardiac hypertrophy provoked by hemodynamic overload. Circulation. 1994;89:2198–2203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Okada M, Kobayashi M, Maruyama H, Takahashi R, Ikemoto F, Yano M, Nishikibe M. Effects of a selective endothelin A-receptor antagonist, BQ-123, in salt-loaded stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995;22:763–768.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Stasch J-P, Hirth-Dietrich C, Frobel K, Wegner M. Prolonged endothelin blockade prevents hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:1128–1134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Fujita K, Matsumara Y, Miyazaki Y, Takaoka M, Morimoto S. Effects of the endothelin ETA-receptor antagonist FR139317 on development of hypertension and cardiovascular hypertrophy in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1996;70:313–319.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Karam H, Heudes D, Hess P, Gonzales MF, Löffler BM, Clozel M, Clozel J-P. Respective role of humoral factors and blood pressure in cardiac remodeling of DOCA hypertensive rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;31:287–295.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ehmke H, Faulhaber J, Münter K, Kirchengast M, Wiesner RJ. Chronic ETA receptor blockade attenuates cardiac hypertrophy independently of blood pressure effects in renovascular hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1999;33:954–960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Herizi A, Jover B, Bouriquet N, Mimran A. Prevention of the cardiovascular and renal effects of angiotensin II by endothelin blockade. Hypertension. 1998;31[pt 1]:10–14.
  13. Kaddoura S, Firth JD, Boheler KR, Sugden PH, Poole-Wilson PA. Endothelin-1 is involved in norepinephrine-induced ventricular hypertrophy in vivo: acute effects of bosentan, an orally active, mixed endothelin ETA and ETB receptor antagonist. Circulation. 1996;93:2068–2079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yue T-L, Cheng H-Y, Lysko PG, McKenna PJ, Feuerstein R, Gu JL, Lysko KA, Davis LL, Feuerstein G. Carvedilol, a new vasodilator and beta adrenoceptor antagonist, is an antioxidant and free radical scavenger. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;263:92–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ruffolo RR, Feuerstein GZ. Pharmacology of carvedilol: rationale for use in hypertension, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Drug Ther. 1997;11:247–256.
  16. Saijonmaa O, Metsarinne K, Fyhrquist F. Carvedilol and its metabolites suppress endothelin-1 production in human endothelial cell culture. Blood Press. 1997;6:24–28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Ohlstein EH, Arleth AJ, Storer B, Romanic AM. Carvedilol inhibits endothelin-1 biosynthesis in cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:167–173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Barone FC, Campbell Jr WG, Nelson AH, Feuerstein GZ. Carvedilol prevents severe hypertensive cardiomyopathy and remodeling. J Hypertens. 1998;16:871–884.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Feron O, Salomone S, Godfraind T. Action of the calcium channel blocker lacidipine on cardiac hypertrophy and endothelin-1 gene expression in stroke-prone hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:659–664.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kyselovic J, Morel N, Wibo M, Godfraind T. Prevention of salt-dependent cardiac remodeling and enhanced gene expression in stroke-prone hypertensive rats by the long-acting calcium channel blocker lacidipine. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1515–1522.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Yorikane R, Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Sakurai T, Sugishita Y, Goto K. Increased production of endothelin-1 in the hypertrophied rat heart due to pressure overload. FEBS Lett. 1993;332:31–34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Jouannot P, Hatt P. Rat myocardial mechanics during pressure-induced hypertrophy development and reversal. Am J Physiol. 1975;229:355–364.
  23. Donckier J, Hanet C, Berbinschi AC, Galanti L, Robert A, Van Mechelen H, Pouleur H, Ketelslegers JM. Cardiovascular and endocrine effects of endothelin-1 at pathophysiological and pharmacological plasma concentrations in conscious dogs. Circulation. 1991;84:2476–2484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Heller LJ, Opsahl JA, Wernsing SE, Saxena R, Katz SA. Myocardial and plasma renin-angiotensinogen dynamics during pressure-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:R849–R856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Arai M, Yoguchi A, Iso T, Takahashi T, Imai S, Murata K, Suzuki T. Endothelin-1 and its binding sites are upregulated in pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H2084–H2091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yamazaki T, Yazaki Y. Is there major involvement of the renin-angiotensin system in cardiac hypertrophy? Circ Res. 1997;81:639–642.
  27. Baker KM, Chernin MI, Wixson SK, Aceto JF. Renin-angiotensin system involvement in pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy in rats. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H324–H332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Everett AD, Tufro-McReddie A, Fisher A, Gomez RA. Angiotensin receptor regulates cardiac hypertrophy and transforming growth factor-ß1 expression. Hypertension. 1994;23:587–592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Harada M, Itoh H, Nakagawa O, Ogawa Y, Miyamoto Y, Kuwahara K, Ogawa E, Igaki T, Yamashita J, Masuda I, Yoshimasa T, Tanaka I, Saito Y, Nakao K. Significance of ventricular myocytes and nonmyocytes interaction during cardiocyte hypertrophy: evidence for endothelin-1 as a paracrine hypertrophic factor from cardiac nonmyocytes. Circulation. 1997;96:3737–3744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pönicke K, Heinroth-Hoffmann I, Becker K, Brodde O-E. Trophic effect of angiotensin II in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes: role of endothelin-1 and non-myocyte cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;121:118–124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Gray MO, Long CS, Kalinyak JE, Li H-T, Karliner JS. Angiotensin II stimulates cardiac myocyte hypertrophy via paracrine release of TGF-ß1 and endothelin-1 from fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;40:352–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bouloumié A, Bauersachs J, Linz W, Schölkens BA, Wiemer G, Fleming I, Busse R. Endothelial dysfunction coincides with an enhanced nitric oxide synthase expression and superoxide anion production. Hypertension. 1997;30:934–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. De Keulenaar GW, Andries LJ, Sys SU, Brutsaert DL. Endothelin-mediated positive inotropic effect induced by reactive oxygen species in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1995;76:878–884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Van Amsterdam FTM, Roveri A, Maiorino M, Ratti E, Ursini F. Lacidipine: a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with antioxidant activity. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;12:183–187.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Cominacini L, Garbin U, Fratta Pasini A, Davoli A, Campagnola M, Pastorino AM, Gaviraghi G, Lo Cascio V. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein increases the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species in endothelial cells: inhibitory effect of lacidipine. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1913–1919.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Emori T, Hirata Y, Ohta K, Kanno K, Eguchi S, Imai T, Shichiri M, Marumo F. Cellular mechanism of endothelin-1 release by angiotensin and vasopressin. Hypertension. 1991;18:165–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Emori T, Hirata Y, Imai T, Ohta K, Kanno K, Eguchi S, Marumo F. Cellular mechanism of thrombin on endothelin-1 biosynthesis and release in bovine endothelial cell. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44:2409–2411.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Himmel HM, Whorton AR, Strauss HC. Intracellular calcium, currents, and stimulus-response coupling in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1993;21:112–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Izumo S, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V. Protooncogene induction and reprogramming of cardiac gene expression produced by pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:339–343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Hamada, M. Suzuki, S. Yuasa, N. Mimura, N. Shinozuka, Y. Takada, M. Suzuki, T. Nishino, H. Nakaya, H. Koseki, et al.
Dilated Cardiomyopathy Caused by Aberrant Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control in Mutant KDEL Receptor Transgenic Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2004; 24(18): 8007 - 8017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Okajima, N. Harada, M. Uchiba, and H. Isobe
Activation of Capsaicin-Sensitive Sensory Neurons by Carvedilol, a Nonselective {beta}-Blocker, in Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2004; 309(2): 684 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. Krenek, S. Salomone, J. Kyselovic, M. Wibo, N. Morel, and T. Godfraind
Lacidipine Prevents Endothelial Dysfunction in Salt-Loaded Stroke-Prone Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1124 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Moser, J. Faulhaber, R. J. Wiesner, and H. Ehmke
Predominant activation of endothelin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by norepinephrine in rat left ventricle
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1389 - R1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Massart, P.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Wibo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Massart, P.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Wibo, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARVEDILOL
*LABETALOL