(Hypertension. 2000;35:280.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From Louisiana State University, School of Medicine, New Orleans (A.C.S.); the Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta (D.M.P.); and the Department of Physiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (J.D.I., E.A.L., B.T.P., E.W.I.).
Correspondence to Edward W. Inscho, PhD, Department of Physiology SL#39, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail einscho{at}mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelin calcium microcirculation receptors, endothelin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, the renal vasoconstrictor actions of ET-1 were thought to involve ETA receptors exclusively, with ETB receptors producing vasodilation by stimulating nitric oxide release from endothelial cells. However, the development of selective ETA receptor antagonists revealed that non-ETA receptors contribute some of the ET-1mediated vasoconstriction. ETB receptormediated vasoconstriction has been demonstrated in vivo in the renal circulation of the rat.5 6 Endothelin receptors have been identified in the kidney, and reports suggest that rat preglomerular microvessels express both ETA and ETB receptors7 8 ; however, there are only limited data demonstrating the functional distribution of ETA and ETB receptors along preglomerular resistance vessels.6
Our laboratory has recently established the methods needed for obtaining viable vascular smooth muscle cells from freshly isolated preglomerular microvascular tissue.9 We used this preparation to determine the effect of receptor selective endothelin peptides on [Ca2+]i in preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells. Additional studies were performed to determine the relative contribution of calcium influx and calcium mobilization on the increase in [Ca2+]i induced by endothelin.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue Preparation and Renal Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cell Isolation
All studies were performed in compliance with the guidelines and practices endorsed by the Tulane University Advisory Committee for Animal Resources. Male Sprague-Dawley CD-VAF rats (weight 250 to 375 g) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg IV), and the abdominal cavity was exposed to permit cannulation of the abdominal aorta as described.9 Ligatures were placed around the abdominal aorta at sites distal to the left and proximal to the right renal arteries. The kidneys were cleared of blood by perfusion with an ice-cold, low-calcium (0.1 mmol Ca2+/L) physiological salt solution (low-calcium PSS; pH 7.35) of the following composition (in mmol/L): 125 NaCl, 5.0 KCl, 1.0 MgCl2, 10.0 glucose, 20.0 HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid), 0.1 CaCl2, and 6% BSA.9 10 11 This was followed by a similar solution containing 1% Evans blue dye in low-calcium PSS.9
Suspensions of preglomerular microvascular smooth muscle cells were prepared as previously described.9 The kidneys were resected from the animal, decapsulated, and the renal medullary tissue was removed. The renal cortex was pressed through a sieve (180-µm mesh), and the retentate was washed with ice-cold, low-calcium PSS before being transferred to an enzyme solution containing 0.075% collagenase, 0.02% dithiothreitol, 0.2% soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 0.1% BSA dissolved in low-calcium PSS. After a 30-minute incubation at 37°C, the vascular tissue was removed from the enzyme solution and transferred to a nylon mesh (70-µm mesh), where it was rinsed with ice-cold, low-calcium PSS. The vascular tissue was transferred to a Petri dish containing ice-cold, low-calcium PSS, and segments of interlobular artery with attached afferent arterioles were collected by microdissection. The selected vascular tissue was placed in an enzyme solution containing 0.075% papain and 0.02% dithiothreitol in low-calcium PSS for 15 minutes at 37°C before being collected by centrifugation (2000g for 50 seconds). The tissue pellet was transferred to an enzyme solution containing 0.3% collagenase and 0.2% soybean trypsin inhibitor in low-calcium PSS at 37°C. After a 15-minute incubation period (37°C), the mixture was gently triturated and quickly centrifuged (500g for 5 minutes). The supernatant was discarded and the dispersed cells were gently resuspended in 1.0 mL DMEM supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 200 µg/mL streptomycin. Cell suspensions were stored on ice until used.
Fluorescence Measurements in Single Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Calibration of the fluorescence data and measurement of [Ca2+]i in single microvascular smooth muscle cells was performed as previously described.9 10 11 Suspensions of freshly isolated renal microvascular cells were loaded with the calcium-sensitive fluorescent probe fura 2 acetoxymethyl ester (fura 2-AM; 10 µmol/L) for 60 minutes at room temperature.9 10 11 An aliquot of cell suspension was transferred to the perfusion chamber (Warner Instrument Corp) and mounted to the stage of a Nikon Diaphot inverted microscope. The cells were continuously superfused (1.3 mL/min) with a 1.8 mmol/L calcium PSS solution of the following composition (in mmol/L): 125 NaCl, 5.0 KCl, 1.0 MgCl2, 10.0 glucose, 20.0 HEPES, 1.8 CaCl2, and 0.111 g/L BSA. For each experiment, a single microvascular cell was isolated in the optical field by positioning the adjustable sampling window directly over the cell of interest. Neighboring cells and debris are thus excluded from the sampling field, allowing fluorescence emission to be measured only from the cell of interest. Experiments were performed at 37°C with the use of a standard microscope-based fluorescence spectrophotometry system (Photon Technology International) as described.9 10 11 Red light imaging was used to monitor the contractile state of the cell throughout the experiment. The dual excitation wavelengths were set at 340 and 380 nm, and the emitted light was collected at 510±20 nm. Measurements of fluorescence intensity were collected at 5 data points per second and analyzed with the aid of Photon Technology International software. All fluorescence measurements were obtained with background subtraction. Background subtraction is accomplished by subtracting the ambient fluorescence of a blank microscope field immediately adjacent to the cell being studied. This subtraction method eliminates nonspecific fluorescence collected from the glass coverslip, perfusion solution, the perfusion chamber, and elements in the optical path.
Experimental Approach
The effects of endothelin peptides on the [Ca2+]i of preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells were determined by exposing single cells to PSS solutions containing ET-1, ET-2, or ET-3 at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 nmol/L. Fura 2 fluorescence was monitored in these cells under control conditions (0 to 100 seconds), during exposure to endothelin peptides (100 to 300 seconds), and during the recovery period, in which endothelin was removed from the bathing solution (300 to 600 seconds). Endothelin-mediated responses were evaluated by determining the average magnitude of the peak and late phase [Ca2+]i achieved in response to each peptide. Peak responses were defined as the maximum [Ca2+]i attained in response to agonist treatment. Late phase responses were obtained by calculating the average [Ca2+]i over the last 50 seconds of agonist exposure.
Studies were performed to determine the role of extracellular calcium on the increase in [Ca2+]i induced by ET-1. The contribution of calcium influx to the response was determined by exposing single cells to 10 nmol/L ET-1 while being bathed in nominally calcium-free PSS.9 10 11 Previous studies have shown that [Ca2+]i remains unchanged when preglomerular smooth muscle cells are subjected to strong depolarizing conditions while being bathed in nominally calcium-free medium.10 Fura 2 fluorescence was monitored in these cells under control conditions (0 to 100 seconds), during exposure to nominally calcium-free conditions (100 to 150 seconds), and during subsequent exposure to endothelin (150 to 350 seconds). These responses were compared with responses obtained from similar cells challenged in normal-calcium PSS.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as representative traces or as mean responses±SE. Within-group comparisons against the resting [Ca2+]i were assessed by ANOVA for repeated measures. Differences between groups were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA. Post hoc tests were performed with the use of the Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Statistical probabilities <0.05 were interpreted to indicate significant differences.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first series of experiments was performed to determine the effect of endothelin peptides on [Ca2+]i in freshly isolated rat renal microvascular smooth muscle cells. The results of those studies are presented in Figures 1 and 2. Experiments were performed with the use of endothelin peptide concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 nmol/L. Figure 1 presents representative traces depicting the change in [Ca2+]i elicited by 100 nmol/L ET-1 (upper panel), ET-2 (middle panel), and ET-3 (lower panel), respectively. The responses to 100 nmol/L ET-1 and ET-2 were biphasic, with [Ca2+]i increasing rapidly to a peak value during the initial phase of the response and gradually decreasing to a more sustained elevation during the late phase of the response. The [Ca2+]i remained elevated on removal of ET-1 or ET-2 from the bathing medium. In contrast, the response of the [Ca2+]i to ET-3 was markedly smaller compared with ET-1 or ET-2. As shown in Figure 1, ET-3 stimulated a modest and monophasic increase in [Ca2+]i that returned to the control concentration when ET-3 was removed from the bathing medium.
|
|
Frequently, [Ca2+]i was found to oscillate in response to ET-1 and, to a lesser degree, in response to ET-2. Sudden increases in [Ca2+]i occur during stable exposure to endothelin peptides and after the peptides have been removed from the bathing solution. The individual traces presented in Figure 1 for ET-1 and ET-2 exhibit some oscillatory behavior during the late phase. More dramatic oscillations are illustrated in Figure 2, which depicts the response of 2 cells to 10 nmol/L ET-1. Figure 2A shows oscillations in [Ca2+]i at a rate of 3 to 4 cycles/100 s. Figure 2B represents another cell that exhibits oscillations in [Ca2+]i at a rate approaching 6 to 7 cycles/100 s. Clearly, [Ca2+]i cycles through several peak responses, both during stable exposure to ET-1 and after ET-1 has been removed from the bath. The secondary peaks consistently achieve a lower [Ca2+]i than are attained in the first peak response. Approximately 70% of the cells treated with 10 to 100 nmol/L ET-1 and
47% of the cells treated with 10 to 100 nmol/L ET-2 display calcium oscillations. Comparison of the traces shown in Figures 1 and 2 reveals that the frequency of the oscillatory behavior varies markedly between cells. Peak increases in [Ca2+]i elicited by ET-1 and ET-2 were also associated with marked shortening of the cell being viewed with red light imaging. This contractile response occurred during the initial peak response and was repeated during each of the oscillatory increases in [Ca2+]i (data not shown). It is interesting to note that neither oscillations in [Ca2+]i nor contractile responses were observed with cells exposed to ET-3.
Figure 3 illustrates the average responses to endothelin peptides obtained from multiple cells and tissue dispersions. ET-1 concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 nmol/L evoked significant increases in [Ca2+]i of 48±16, 930±125, and 810±130 nmol/L, respectively. The late phase of the response averaged 6±13, 67±15, and 48±12 nmol/L, respectively. Similar concentrations of ET-2 stimulated peak increases in [Ca2+]i of 9±2, 216±43, and 497±40 nmol/L, respectively. The late phase of the response averaged 4±2, 34±12, and 37±11 nmol/L, respectively. The magnitude of the peak response to ET-2 was significantly smaller than the response to ET-1 at the 10 and 100 nmol/L concentrations. A similar difference existed for the late-phase responses at the 10 nmol/L concentration. Approximately 80% of the cells treated with 10 or 100 nmol/L ET-1 exhibited a >20% elevation of intracellular calcium concentration in the last 50 seconds of ET-1 superfusion. Similarly,
64% of cells treated with 10 or 100 nmol/L ET-2 exhibited a >20% elevation of intracellular calcium concentration in the last 50 seconds of agonist exposure. ET-3 administration also increased [Ca2+]i; however, the responses were significantly smaller than the responses elicited by ET-1 or ET-2. The peak increase in [Ca2+]i averaged 14±5, 33±16, and 44±19 nmol/L, respectively, whereas the late phase of the response averaged 0±3, 13±13, and 6±5 nmol/L, respectively. Only
7% (2 of 29) of the cells treated with 10 or 100 nmol/L ET-3 showed an increase in calcium concentration during the late phase.
|
We also considered the relative contribution of calcium mobilization from intracellular stores and calcium influx from the extracellular medium to the ET-1mediated increase in [Ca2+]i. These studies were performed by exposing cells to a solution containing 10 nmol/L ET-1 while being bathed in a nominally calcium-free solution. Responses obtained under calcium-free conditions were compared with control responses obtained from cells bathed in a solution containing 1.8 mmol/L Ca2+. Cells studied under control conditions and in calcium-free conditions were obtained from identical cell suspensions. Figure 4A depicts a typical control response with a sharp initial increase in [Ca2+]i followed by a continued elevation above baseline in the late phase of the response (
150 to 200 seconds after ET-1 exposure). Two examples of responses obtained in nominally calcium-free conditions are shown in Figures 4B and 4C. Removal of calcium from the extracellular medium did not attenuate the magnitude of the peak response, whereas it markedly reduced the elevation of [Ca2+]i normally seen the late phase of ET-1 exposure. Interestingly, oscillations in [Ca2+]i continued to be observed despite the absence of calcium in the extracellular bathing medium. A representative example is shown in Figure 4C. Under the same experimental conditions as used in Figure 4B, ET-1 administration stimulated an initial peak increase in [Ca2+]i and returned toward baseline levels. Three more increases in [Ca2+]i were observed in rapid succession before the [Ca2+]i stabilized. All 3 of these calcium spikes reached peak [Ca2+]i values that were smaller than the initial peak.
|
Figure 5 illustrates typical cell responses to ET-1 administration. The top panels depict a contractile response to ET-1 with 1.8 mmol/L extracellular Ca2+. The bottom left panel illustrates the cell under control conditions while being bathed in medium containing 1.8 mmol/L Ca2+. The top right panel illustrates the same cell after exposure to 10 nmol/L ET-1. Clearly the contractile response evoked by ET-1 treatment resulted in a marked shortening of the cell along its long axis. The bottom panels depict a similar experiment performed in a nominally calcium-free condition. The bottom left panel illustrates the cell under control conditions while being bathed in nominally calcium-free medium. The bottom right panel illustrates the same cell after exposure to 10 nmol/L ET-1 administered in nominally calcium-free medium. Despite the absence of Ca2+ in the extracellular medium, ET-1 administration still resulted in a pronounced contraction of the cell. In both cases presented in Figure 5, the contractile response closely coincided with the initial increase in [Ca2+]i.
|
Analysis of the individual cell responses indicated that baseline [Ca2+]i averaged 85±5 nmol/L (n=9) and 83±11 nmol/L (n=10) for the control cells and calcium-free cells, respectively. Under control conditions, 10 nmol/L ET-1 stimulated a peak increase in [Ca2+]i of 667±65 nmol/L and a late-phase elevation of 76±15 (Figure 6). These changes in [Ca2+]i are similar to the responses to 10 nmol/L ET-1 shown in Figure 1. In the calcium-free group, exposure of cells to nominally calcium-free bathing medium reduced [Ca2+]i slightly but significantly to 75±7 nmol/L. In contrast to responses obtained from control cells, exposure to ET-1 under calcium-free conditions increased [Ca2+]i by an average of 945±106 nmol/L before returning to a sustained [Ca2+]i not different from control (Figure 6). The [Ca2+]i during the late phase was not different from the baseline [Ca2+]i in the absence of extracellular calcium and was significantly smaller than the control response. Interestingly, the peak response obtained from cells in calcium-free conditions was significantly greater than the response from control cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelin receptors are classified into 2 subtypes, ETA and ETB. In general, ETA receptors produce vasoconstriction as the result of their localization on vascular smooth muscle, whereas ETB receptors produce vasodilation by stimulating the release of nitric oxide and prostacyclin from endothelial cells. However, in the renal circulation, evidence suggests the presence of both ETA and ETB receptors that produce vasoconstriction.7 8 15 20 22 23 To date, there are only limited data demonstrating the functional distribution of ETA and ETB receptors along preglomerular resistance vessels. Endlich et al,6 using the split hydronephrotic kidney technique, reported that ETB receptormediated vasoconstriction was present at both preglomerular and postglomerular sites, whereas ETA receptors are strictly preglomerular. Although similar results have not been obtained in kidneys with intact functioning nephrons, they do suggest the possibility that ETB receptors might exist primarily on postglomerular vessels.
Because of the unique rank-order potency profile for endothelin peptides, we were able to characterize the receptor subtype selectivity in single vascular smooth muscle cells obtained from the rat renal preglomerular microcirculation. The relative potencies for the ETA receptor is ET-1
ET-2>>ET-3 and ET-1=ET-2=ET-3 for the ETB receptor. We observed similar changes in [Ca2+]i after ET-1 and ET-2, with very little response to ET-3, which suggests that the response arises primarily from ETA receptor activation. Peak increases in [Ca2+]i elicited by ET-1 and ET-2 were similar in magnitude and significantly greater than peak responses evoked by ET-3. In addition, the calcium response elicited by ET-1 and ET-2 was continued through the late phase of peptide administration and continued after the peptides were removed from the bathing medium. The response to ET-3 returned to baseline during or soon after removal of ET-3 from the bath. The difference in the ability of ET-1 and ET-3 to elevate intracellular calcium in preglomerular smooth muscle cells is consistent with the vasoconstrictor responses induced by these peptides on isolated rabbit afferent arterioles.24 Edwards et al7 reported that ET-1 and ET-2 elicited vasoconstrictor responses that were indistinguishable from each other, whereas ET-3 was markedly less potent. Endlich et al6 reported that ETA receptor blockade with BQ-123 nearly abolished ET-1mediated afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. The functional evidence generated in the rat and rabbit kidney supports a predominant role of ETA receptor activation in endothelin-mediated preglomerular vasoconstriction and is consistent with the ability of endothelin to elevate [Ca2+]i in preglomerular smooth muscle cells. However, radioligand binding studies suggest that ETA and ETB receptors are found on the preglomerular vasculature in roughly equal proportions.7 8 Precisely what role these ETB receptors play in the renal microcirculation remains to be determined as well as the mechanisms by which they influence renal vascular resistance. The current data fit the predicted profile expected for ETA receptor activation; however, more definitive studies will need to be performed to conclusively identify the receptor subtype(s) involved in the response.
Little is known about the calcium signaling pathways used by different endothelin receptor subtypes in the renal microcirculation.17 19 20 23 24 The current study represents our initial investigation into the calcium signaling mechanisms in preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells and reveals signaling pathways similar to those previously described in large-caliber arteries, cultured vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells.1 15 17 20 25 In nonrenal vascular smooth muscle, endothelin evokes a biphasic elevation of [Ca2+]i by binding to ETA receptors at the cell surface and activating a pertussis toxininsensitive G-protein that in turn stimulates phospholipase C (PLC).1 Hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol by PLC generates the second messengers, IP3 and diacylglycerol. IP3 is a fast-acting mediator that facilitates the first phase of the response by binding to a receptor on the sarcoplasmic reticulum and triggering release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. The second phase of the response involves Ca2+ influx from the extracellular fluid.17 20 The sustained elevation in [Ca2+]i that results from Ca2+ influx is postulated to increase smooth muscle contractility.1 Although numerous studies have attributed the influx of extracellular Ca2+ to activation of L-type Ca2+ channels, the precise mechanism by which endothelin activates this channel is largely unresolved.17 20 Furthermore, it has been shown that L-type Ca2+ channels account for only a portion of the Ca2+ response and that other channels may be involved.17 20 26 27
It is interesting to note that endothelin-mediated increases in [Ca2+]i begin only after a rather lengthy time delay. Cells were exposed to endothelin for a period of 200 seconds. After correction for the dead space in the perfusion circuit, which accounts for
40 seconds, the time to the initial increase in [Ca2+]i averaged
56±6 seconds. This delay is considerably longer than the response time commonly observed to other agonists. For example, increases in [Ca2+]i elicited by P2 receptor activation with ATP or UTP normally begin within
8 to 10 seconds after the cell is exposed to the agonist. Similarly, preliminary experiments performed with vasopressin suggest that [Ca2+]i begins to increase within
9 seconds of exposure. Clearly, the delay observed with endothelin is longer than for other agonists. The physiological explanation for the delay remains to be determined, but it is interesting to speculate on its origins. Further experiments will need to be performed to determine if the delay results from slower association kinetics in forming the ligand receptor complex or if it is related to slower activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways.
In the current study, ET-1 and ET-2 stimulated a biphasic increase in [Ca2+]i that was associated with contraction of the cell under investigation. The initial peak response was greater in magnitude than any subsequent peaks or oscillations in [Ca2+]i. Removal of calcium from the extracellular medium did not significantly reduce the magnitude of the initial peak response, whereas it completely abolished the sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i during the late phase. In fact, the peak response of cells treated with ET-1 was significantly increased compared with the control cells. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the peak response(s) is(are) derived from rapid mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores. Identification of the specific type of calcium store responsible for endothelin-mediated mobilization of calcium was not investigated and cannot be determined from the data contained in this report; however, it is reasonable to postulate that the PLC/inositol triphosphate pathway is at least partially responsible.1 4 25 Furthermore, the rapid return of [Ca2+]i to the baseline value indicates that calcium influx from the extracellular medium sustains the elevation of [Ca2+]i.
The experiments performed under nominally calcium-free conditions suggest that an additional level of regulation of [Ca2+]i may exist in these cells, which involves interaction between calcium entering from the extracellular medium and calcium released from intracellular stores. Previous studies have shown that the contractile response of rabbit aortic strips is enhanced after short exposure to low-calcium conditions.28 One postulate is that calcium mobilization is partially suppressed by the influx of extracellular calcium. Removal of calcium from the extracellular medium reduces the contribution of calcium entry to the overall increase in [Ca2+]i and reduces the inhibitory influence of calcium entry on calcium mobilization. Additional studies are required to evaluate this interesting observation.
The traces presented in Figure 2 clearly demonstrate the oscillations [Ca2+]i induced by ET-1. Although this behavior is not observed in every cell, it is frequently observed in response to ET-1 and ET-2 treatment but not to ET-3 treatment. Calcium oscillations were still observed in nominally calcium-free conditions, which indicates that the calcium spikes arise from periodic calcium release events involving intracellular stores. The mechanisms responsible for calcium oscillations are poorly understood and are an active area of study in renal and nonrenal vascular tissue. In other cell types, calcium oscillations have been linked to activation of PLC.29 On the basis of previous studies supporting the involvement of PLC in renal microvascular responses to vasoconstrictor stimuli, it is reasonable to postulate that PLC is involved in the calcium responses to endothelin in preglomerular smooth muscle cells.30 31 32 33 The agonist-induced occurrence of repetitive calcium spikes and the reliance of these calcium oscillations on intracellular calcium is consistent with previous studies on angiotensin in mouse juxtaglomerular cells.34 In that report, Kurtz and Penner34 showed that angiotensin II stimulated repetitive elevations in [Ca2+]i even in calcium-free medium. Calcium oscillations are also observed in freshly isolated preglomerular smooth muscle cells in response to P2 receptor activation.9 Loutzenhiser et al19 reported that ET-1 treatment potently vasoconstricted afferent arterioles and provoked pronounced oscillatory behavior. It is tempting to speculate that the oscillatory changes in afferent arteriolar diameter might be associated with calcium oscillations in afferent arteriolar smooth muscle. Whether or not oscillatory increases in [Ca2+]i play an important role in the physiological regulation of renal microvascular function remains to be determined.
In summary, endothelin peptides stimulate an increase in [Ca2+]i in freshly isolated preglomerular smooth muscle cells. The temporal characteristics of the calcium response vary in a peptide-specific manner. ET-1 and ET-2 stimulate biphasic increases in [Ca2+]i, whereas ET-3 elicits responses that are monophasic and smaller in magnitude than ET-1 or ET-2. This pharmacological profile is consistent with the hypothesis that endothelin-mediated elevations in [Ca2+]i arise primarily through activation of ETA receptors, with perhaps a smaller component arising through ETB receptor stimulation. The peak responses to ET-1 are primarily generated by mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores, whereas sustained elevations in [Ca2+]i reflect the influx of calcium from the extracellular medium.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 14, 1999; first decision October 19, 1999; accepted October 29, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Highsmith RF, Blackburn K, Schmidt DJ. Endothelin and calcium dynamics in vascular smooth muscle. Ann Rev Physiol. 1992;54:257277.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Douglas SA, Ohlstein EH. Signal transduction mechanisms mediating the vascular actions of endothelin. J Vasc Res. 1997;34:152164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Schiffrin EL, Touyz RM. Vascular biology of endothelin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;32:S2S13.
5.
Pollock DM, Opgenorth TJ. Evidence for endothelin-induced renal vasoconstriction independent of ETA receptor activation. Am J Physiol (Regul Integr Comp Physiol). 1993;264:R222R226.
6.
Endlich K, Hoffend J, Steinhausen M. Localization of endothelin ETA and ETB receptor-mediated constriction in the renal microcirculation of rats. J Physiol (Lond). 1996;497:211218.
7.
Edwards RM, Trizna W. Characterization of 125I-endothelin binding to rat and rabbit renal microvasculature. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274:10841089.
8. DeLeon H, Garcia R. Characterization of endothelin receptor subtypes in isolated rat renal preglomerular microvessels. Regul Pept. 1995;60:18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Inscho EW, LeBlanc EA, Pham BT, White SM, Imig JD. Purinoceptor-mediated calcium signaling in preglomerular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1999;33:195200.
10. Inscho EW, Mason MJ, Schroeder AC, Deichmann PC, Steigler KD, Imig JD. Agonist-induced calcium regulation in freshly isolated renal microvascular smooth muscle cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:569579.[Abstract]
11.
Inscho EW, Schroeder AC, Deichmann PC, Imig JD. ATP-mediated Ca2+ signaling in preglomerular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol (Renal Physiol). 1999;276:F450F456.
12. Noll G, Wenzel RR, Lüscher TF. Endothelin and endothelin antagonists: potential role in cardiovascular and renal disease. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;157:259267.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Pinto-Sietsma SJ, Paul M. A role for endothelin in the pathogenesis of hypertension: fact or fiction? Kidney Int. 1998;54:S115S121.
14. Miyauchi T, Masaki T. Pathophysiology of endothelin in the cardiovascular system. Ann Rev Physiol. 1999;61:391415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Pollock DM, Banks RO. Perspectives on renal blood flow autoregulation. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1991;198:800805.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Navar LG, Inscho EW, Majid DSA, Imig JD, Harrison-Bernard LM, Mitchell KD. Paracrine regulation of the renal microcirculation. Physiol Rev. 1996;76:425536.
17.
Takenaka T, Epstein M, Forster H, Landry DH, Iijima K, Goligorsky MS. Attenuation of the endothelin effects by a chloride channels inhibitor, indanyloxyacetic acid. Am J Physiol (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol). 1992;262:F799F806.
18.
Hirata Y, Matsuoka H, Kimura K, Fukui K, Hayakawa H, Suzuki E, Sugimoto T, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T. Renal vasoconstriction by the endothelial cell-derived peptide endothelin in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1989;65:13701379.
19.
Loutzenhiser R, Epstein M, Hayashi K, Horton C. Direct visualization of effects of endothelin on the renal microvasculature. Am J Physiol (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol). 1990;258:F61F68.
20.
Gordienko DV, Clausen C, Goligorsky MS. Ionic currents and endothelin signalling in smooth muscle cells from rat resistance arteries. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F325F341.
21.
Takenaka T, Forster H, Epstein M. Protein kinase C and calcium channel activation as determinants of renal vasoconstriction by angiotensin II and endothelin. Circ Res. 1993;73:743750.
22. Hocher B, Rohmeiss P, Zart R, Diekmann F, Vogt V, Metz D, Fakhury M, Gretz N, Bauer C, Koppenhagen K, Neumayer HH, Distler A. Function and expression of endothelin receptor subtypes in the kidneys of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;31:499510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Cao L, Banks RO. Cardiovascular and renal actions of endothelin: effects of calcium channel blockers. Am J Physiol (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol). 1990;258:F254F258.
24.
Edwards RM, Trizna W, Ohlstein EH. Renal microvascular effects of endothelin. Am J Physiol (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol). 1990;259:F217F221.
25.
Iijima K, Lin L, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Intracellular ramification of endothelin signal. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiol). 1991;260:C982C992.
26. Simonson MS, Dunn MJ. The molecular mechanisms of cardiovascular and renal regulation by endothelin peptides. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;119:622639.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Chen C, Wagoner PK. Endothelin induces a nonselective cation current in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1991;69:447454.
28.
Bohr DF. Vascular smooth muscle: dual effect of calcium. Science. 1963;139:597599.
29.
Evans JH, Sanderson MJ. Intracellular calcium oscillations induced by ATP in airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol (Lung Cell Mol Physiol). 1999;277:L30L41.
30. Takenaka T, Suzuki H, Fujiwara K, Kanno Y, Ohno Y, Hayashi K, Nagahama T, Saruta T. Cellular mechanisms mediating rat renal microvascular constriction by angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:21072114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Takenaka T, Suzuki H, Okada H, Hayashi K, Ozawa Y, Saruta T. Biophysical signals underlying myogenic responses in rat interlobular artery. Hypertension. 1998;32:10601065.
32.
Inscho EW, Cook AK, Mui V, Imig JD. Calcium mobilization contributes to pressure-mediated afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. Hypertension. 1998;31:421428.
33.
Inscho EW, Imig JD, Cook AK. Afferent and efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction to angiotensin II and norepinephrine involves release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Hypertension. 1997;29:222227.
34.
Kurtz A, Penner R. Angiotensin II induces oscillations of intracellular calcium and blocks anomalous inward rectifying potassium current in mouse renal juxtaglomerular cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:34233427.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Ponnuchamy and R. A. Khalil Cellular mediators of renal vascular dysfunction in hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): R1001 - R1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Pollock, J. M. Jenkins, A. K. Cook, J. D. Imig, and E. W. Inscho L-type calcium channels in the renal microcirculatory response to endothelin Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): F771 - F777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Delarue, I. R. Jouet, M. Gras, L. Galas, A. Fournier, and H. Vaudry Activation of EndothelinA Receptors in Frog Adrenocortical Cells Stimulates Both Calcium Mobilization from Intracellular Stores and Calcium Influx through L-Type Calcium Channels Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 119 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Fellner and L. A. Parker Endothelin B receptor Ca2+ signaling in shark vascular smooth muscle: participation of inositol trisphosphate and ryanodine receptors J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(19): 3411 - 3417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. McNair, D. A. Salamanca, and R. A. Khalil Endothelin-1 Promotes Ca2+ Antagonist-Insensitive Coronary Smooth Muscle Contraction Via Activation of {epsilon}-Protein Kinase C Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Murphy, J. N. Herrington, J. P. Granger, and R. A. Khalil Enhanced [Ca2+]i in renal arterial smooth muscle cells of pregnant rats with reduced uterine perfusion pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): H393 - H403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Ryan, T. A. Black, S. L. Millard, K. W. Gross, and G. Hajduczok Endothelin-1 increases calcium and attenuates renin gene expression in As4.1 cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2458 - H2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Liu, P. D. Bell, J. Peti-Peterdi, G. Kovacs, A. Johansson, and A. E. G. Persson Purinergic Receptor Signaling at the Basolateral Membrane of Macula Densa Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2002; 13(5): 1145 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Murphy, J. B. Fleming, K. L. Cockrell, J. P. Granger, and R. A. Khalil [Ca2+]i signaling in renal arterial smooth muscle cells of pregnant rat is enhanced during inhibition of NOS Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2001; 280(1): R87 - R99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Imig Eicosanoid regulation of the renal vasculature Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): F965 - F981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |