(Hypertension. 2000;35:418.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Clinical Research Department, 2nd Institute of Physiology, Semmelweis University of Medicine (M.S.), Budapest, Hungary; the Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin (A.-P.Z., D.L.M., A.W.C.), Milwaukee; and the Laboratoria de Cardiovascular, Department de Fisiologia, ICBS, UFRGS (C.Y.M.), Brazil.
Correspondence to Allen W. Cowley, Jr, PhD, Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, POB 26509, Milwaukee, WI 53226-0509. E-mail cowley{at}mcw.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptormediated increase in the renal medullary nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity as a counterregulatory mechanism of blood pressure control in response to increased renal adrenergic stimulation. A subpressor dose of norepinephrine (NE, 8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) was infused intravenously, and NOS activity was determined with arginine-citrulline conversion by high-performance liquid chromatography in renal cortical and outer and inner medullary tissues. It was found that after 7 days of intravenous NE infusion, NOS activity was significantly higher in both the outer and inner medullary tissues (158±45 versus 30±24 pmol · mg-1 · h-1 [outer medulla] and 5.1±0.7 versus 2.0±0.5 nmol · mg-1 · h-1 [inner medulla] for NE-treated versus control rats, respectively). To determine whether the increase of NOS activity was mediated through renal medullary
2-receptors, the receptor antagonist rauwolscine (RAU, 1 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was infused via an implanted renal medullary interstitial catheter, and the consequences of intravenous NE administration were evaluated. NOS activity was significantly lower in the RAU-infused animals and did not increase with infusion of NE. To determine the systemic effects of the renal medullary
2-receptors, studies were performed to determine the consequences of chronic intravenous infusion of subpressor amounts of NE in the presence and absence of renal medullary
2-receptor inhibition. Under conditions in which RAU was continuously infused into the renal medulla, the same subpressor dose of NE caused sustained and reversible hypertension (mean arterial pressure increased from 120±3 to 131±3 mm Hg). Chronic blunting of the renal medullary NOS activity with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (75 µg · kg-1 · h-1) also enabled NE to produce a significant rise in mean arterial pressure (from 117±2 to 134±4 mm Hg). We conclude that the hypertensive effects of moderate elevations of renal adrenergic activity were chronically buffered by the
2-receptormediated increase in NOS activity within the renal medulla.
Key Words: norepinephrine receptors, adrenergic, alpha rauwolscine nitric oxide synthase rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second major goal of the present study was to determine the role of the
2-adrenergic receptor subtype in mediating the chronic actions of NE on renal medullary NO production. There is evidence that NE-induced NO production is mediated by
2-adrenergic receptors in various regions of the body.11 We have found that acute renal medullary interstitial infusion of the
2-receptor inhibitor rauwolscine (RAU) blocks the NE-induced increase in medullary [NO] and consequently leads to reductions of medullary blood flow (MBF), which were not observed in the absence of RAU with NE administered at the same dose.1 It was also found that the
2-mRNA colocalized to the same renal medullary microvessels (eg, glomeruli and vasa recta) and tubular structures (eg, medullary thick ascending limb and collecting ducts) that contain the greatest NOS enzyme activity.1 12 The chronic interaction of this adrenergic receptor and the NO pathways in the renal medulla has not been studied and was therefore the focus of the present experiments.
We hypothesized that chronic stimulation of the renal medullary
2-receptors associated with a continuous intravenous infusion of NE would result in an increase of renal medullary NOS activity, which would, in turn, act to buffer a rise of arterial pressure. To test this hypothesis, Sprague-Dawley rats were uninephrectomized, and the remaining kidney was instrumented with a chronically implanted renal medullary interstitial catheter. This small medullary catheter was used to continuously deliver either RAU, L-NAME, or isotonic saline during the chronic intravenous administration of NE through an implanted femoral venous catheter. Concentrations of these respective inhibitors were predetermined on the basis of observations that these doses did not result in hypertension when chronically administered alone into the renal medulla. Arterial pressure was measured daily in conscious rats by use of implanted aortic catheters. Renal cortical and medullary NOS activities were determined by use of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) arginine-citrulline conversion assay technique.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical Instrumentation Procedures
For all surgical procedures, acepromazine (2 mg/kg IM) and ketamine (100 mg/kg IM) were used in combination as anesthesia. In the renal medullary infusion experiments, rats were uninephrectomized to avoid possible regulatory effects from the contralateral kidney. One week after uninephrectomy, catheters were implanted into the femoral artery for blood pressure measurement and into the femoral vein for infusion of NE or saline, as previously described in detail.6 13 An additional indwelling catheter was placed into the single remaining kidney deep (
5.5 mm) in the renal medulla to infuse L-NAME, RAU, or saline.3 All catheters were tunneled subcutaneously to the back of the neck, where they were exteriorized through a midscapular incision and passed through a spring for protection. After surgery, penicillin G (Crysticillin, 300 000 U/kg IM) and buprenorphin (Buprenex, 0.3 mg/kg SC) were given. Rats were housed individually and received a continuous renal interstitial infusion of isotonic saline at a rate of 0.5 mL/h and intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.25 mL/h throughout a minimum of 7 days of surgical recovery to ensure patency of the interstitial and venous catheters.
Measuring NOS Enzyme Activity
Kidneys were removed from pentobarbital-anesthetized rats (50 mg/kg IP), and the renal cortex and outer and inner medulla were dissected, snap-frozen, homogenized, and centrifuged (16 000g). The supernatant was retained, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by the Coomassie method (Pierce). The sample was then used immediately for the measurement of NOS enzyme activity, which was determined by arginine-citrulline conversion assay with reverse-phase HPLC as described in detail elsewhere.12 Briefly, 50 µg of inner medulla protein and 100 µg of cortex or outer medulla were incubated with 2 mmol/L CaCl2, 1 mmol/L NADPH, 25 µmol/L flavin adenine dinucleotide, 1.25 µg/mL calmodulin, 10 µmol/L tetrahydrobiopterin, and L-[3H]arginine (
300 000 cpm, specific activity 68 Ci/mmol) in 100 µL of 20 mmol/L HEPES buffer, pH 7.2, at 37°C. The duration of the incubation was 30 minutes for the inner medullary samples and 2 hours for outer medullary and cortical samples. The arginine and converted citrulline were separated by isocratic reverse-phase HPLC with a system consisting of a Hitachi 7250 Auto Sampler, Hitachi L-7100 gradient pump, Suppelco LC18-D8 column, and a Packard Beta-flow A100 detector. NOS activity was determined from the ratio of the total L-[3H]arginine converted to L-[3H]citrulline and the amount of total arginine in the reaction. As we previously described,12 total L-arginine in the reaction was adjusted to 23 µmol/L in each sample to equalize the starting substrate concentration and permit the comparison of enzymatic activity in each tissue.
Experimental Protocol
Protocol 1: NOS Enzyme Activity in the Renal Cortex and Outer and Inner Medulla of Sprague-Dawley Rats Receiving Intravenous NE Infusion for 7 Days
Six rats prepared with a venous catheter were infused intravenously with NE (Arterenol, 8 µg · kg-1 · h-1, Sigma Chemical Co) for 7 days. This dose of NE was shown in acute studies in our laboratory to have no effect on MBF and mean arterial pressure (MAP)1 and did not produce chronic hypertension.14 In the control group of 6 rats, intravenous saline infusion was continued for 7 days. On day 7 of NE or saline infusion, rats were anesthetized, kidneys were removed, and NOS activity was measured as described above.
Protocol 2: NOS Enzyme Activity in NE-Treated Rats After
2-Receptor Blockade
Six uninephrectomized rats were prepared with a venous catheter and a renal interstitial catheter. To demonstrate that the increase in the NOS enzyme activity is associated with
2-adrenergic receptor stimulation, NOS enzyme activity was measured in the rats receiving NE in the presence and absence of renal medullary interstitial infusion of the
2-blocker RAU (1 µg · kg-1 · min-1). One week after surgery, the renal interstitial saline infusion was switched to RAU. After 3 days of renal interstitial RAU infusion, an intravenous NE infusion (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) was started and continued for 7 days. Another 6 rats prepared in a similar manner were infused with saline into the renal medulla while NE was given intravenously. On day 7 of NE infusion, animals were anesthetized, the single remaining kidney was removed, and NOS enzyme activity was measured as described above.
Protocol 3: Chronic Effect of Subpressor Intravenous NE Infusion on MAP in Rats With Blunted Medullary NOS Activity
Seven uninephrectomized rats were prepared with an arterial and venous catheter and a renal interstitial catheter. One week after surgery, daily 2-hour measurements of MAP were begun by using an on-line data collection and analysis system as described previously.6 13 After 3 stable control days, L-NAME (Sigma) was infused through the renal medullary interstitial catheter at a dose (75 µg · kg-1 · h-1) that was shown earlier to be nonpressor.9 15 After 3 days of L-NAME infusion, intravenous NE infusion (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) was started and continued for 7 days, followed by 2 postcontrol days of saline. Another similarly prepared group of rats (n=7) was studied as a control group to determine the influence of chronic NE infusion in the absence of medullary L-NAME administration. A medullary interstitial catheter was implanted, and the rats were infused at the same rate with isotonic saline rather than L-NAME throughout the entire protocol.
Protocol 4: Chronic Effect of Subpressor Intravenous NE Infusion on MAP in Rats With
2-Adrenergic Blockade
To investigate the role of the renal medullary
2-receptors in the regulation of arterial blood pressure, 2 additional groups of rats were studied. In the first group, 7 rats were prepared with an arterial and venous catheter and a renal interstitial catheter. After 3 stable control days, the
2-receptor blocker RAU (1 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was continuously infused into the renal medulla through the implanted interstitial catheter for the remainder of the experiment. Three days after starting RAU, intravenous NE (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) was started and continued for 7 days with RAU renal interstitial infusion. As a time control, we infused RAU into the renal medulla of another group of rats (n=5) for 9 days while saline rather than NE was infused intravenously.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. For statistical comparisons of the chronic blood pressure measurement, 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by the Tukey multiple range test as a post hoc test was used. To determine the differences in the NOS enzyme assay, 1-way ANOVA was used. All statistical analyses were performed on the raw data. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Protocol 2: NOS Enzyme Activity and Protein Expression in NE-Treated Rats After
2-Receptor Blockade
The effect of RAU on NE-induced NOS activity was measured in uninephrectomized rats in which the left kidney was instrumented with a renal interstitial catheter to infuse RAU or saline. As seen in Figure 2, NOS enzyme activity was significantly lower in rats receiving NE infusions in the presence of RAU than in rats receiving NE with renal interstitial saline infusion in place of RAU (n=6).
|
Protocol 3: Chronic Effect of Subpressor Intravenous NE Infusion on MAP in Rats With Blunted Medullary NOS Activity
The top panel of Figure 3 shows that intravenous infusion of NE (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) resulted in a sustained and reversible hypertension in rats pretreated with renal medullary L-NAME at a subpressor dose (75 µg · kg-1 · h-1). The average rise in MAP was 17 mm Hg (n=7). The L-NAME dose was a threshold dose and did not significantly increase MAP. We have previously reported that this L-NAME dose infused into the renal medulla did not produce hypertension even if given for 11 days.9 In control rats, in which saline was infused into the renal medullary interstitial space instead of L-NAME, intravenous NE in the same dose did not significantly change MAP during 1 week of continuous infusion (Figure 3, bottom panel).
|
Protocol 4: Chronic Effect of Subpressor Intravenous NE Infusion on MAP in Rats With
2-Adrenergic Blockade
Because RAU blocked the acute NE-induced rise in medullary [NO], we predicted that the hypertensive effects of NE would be enhanced when RAU was chronically infused into the renal medulla, as was seen with L-NAME. As shown in the top panel of Figure 4, RAU (1 µg · kg-1 · min-1), administered locally to the renal medulla, also enabled subpressor doses of chronic intravenous NE (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) to moderately, but significantly, increase MAP by 11 mm Hg (n=7). This hypertension was sustained and reversible, as was the case with the L-NAMENE hypertension. Renal interstitial infusion of RAU alone at the same dose (Figure 4, bottom panel) did not cause any significant elevation of MAP throughout the 9 days of infusion (n=5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptors. Third, reducing the responsiveness of renal medullary NOS to NE by infusion of the
2-receptor blocker into the renal medulla enabled nonpressor doses (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) of NE to produce a sustained and reversible hypertension, as was seen with the reduction of NOS activity by L-NAME.
NE Stimulation of Renal Medullary NOS Activity
The dose of NE used in the present study (8 µg · kg-1 · h-1) was shown previously to produce only small physiological increases of plasma NE levels from 0.2 to 1.77 ng/mL14 ; furthermore, it is a nonpressor dose when administered either acutely or chronically.1 14 The action of NE on renal NOS activity could therefore be studied in the absence of systemic hemodynamic changes.
The results of the present study have demonstrated that sustained elevations of circulating NE result in a chronic elevation of NOS enzyme activity in the renal medulla but not in the cortex. The vasculature of the renal medulla has been reported to have greater adrenergic tone than that of the cortex16 ; thus, to protect this region of the kidney from excessive vasoconstriction, it may require a stronger counterregulatory system. The NO system in the renal medulla has been shown to be an effective counterregulatory mechanism against the vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II and vasopressin.9 10 15 17 Elevated plasma levels of these agonists were shown to increase renal medullary [NO], which buffered the expected medullary vasoconstriction and prevented arterial hypertension. We have also shown that small chronic elevations in plasma angiotensin II or vasopressin upregulate endothelial NOS in the renal medulla.10 18 Others have found that noradrenergic neurons are capable of generating NO through an increase in neuronal NOS,19 the isoform that plays a role in arterial blood pressure regulation as well.20 NE-induced activation of
1 of the NOS isoforms with a resulting increase in [NO] may play an important role in the long-term control of arterial blood pressure and serve as a counterregulatory mechanism against the hypertensive actions of NE.
Role of
2-Receptors in NO Release
There is evidence reported by others that the NE-induced NO release occurs through the
2-receptors11 21 22 23 24 and that
2-activation increases the influence of NO in the glomeruli and proximal tubules of rats.25 It has also been shown that in a model of hypertension induced by inhibition of NOS activity, rat vessels become more sensitive to
2-receptor stimulation.26 We have reported previously that blockade of the renal medullary
2-receptors with RAU completely abolishes NE-induced increases in the renal medullary [NO], whereas blockade of the
1-receptor with the specific
1-antagonist, prazosin, does not.1 Furthermore,
2-receptors and NOS enzyme isoforms are colocalized in the inner medullary collecting ducts and in the vasa recta,1 12 suggesting that the
2-receptormediated NO release takes place in these structures of the kidney. Taken together, it appears that the NE-induced NO release is through
2-receptors.
Chronic Antihypertensive Actions of Medullary NO Mediated by Medullary
2-Receptors
The major finding of the present study is that the renal medullary
2-receptors play an important role in long-term blood pressure regulation. These results are consistent with our previous observations that
2-receptor stimulation increases renal medullary [NO] and buffers the
1-receptorinduced vasoconstriction of medullary vessels.1 MBF can play an important role in long-term arterial blood pressure regulation, and it has been shown that an increase in blood flow to the renal medulla can enhance sodium and water excretion and reduce arterial blood pressure.27 The effect of the
2-receptor inhibition on arterial blood pressure appears to be confined to renal medullary structures. A number of earlier studies in our laboratory have confirmed that renal medullary infusion of various drugs into the medullary interstitial space at the same rate as in the present study resulted in trapping of the compounds in the renal medulla with little escape.3 9 In addition, in acute studies from our laboratory,1 even higher amounts of RAU, infused into the renal medulla, did not alter the cortical hemodynamics. This would indicate that RAU neither diffused to the cortex nor reached the cortical circulation by recirculation in a sufficient amount to have any substantial effects.
A number of studies have suggested that
2-receptors may be important in arterial blood pressure regulation. For example,
2-receptors have been implicated in the regulation of renal tubular ion transport activity.28 29 However, the role of
2-receptor stimulation on renal function is clearly quite complex. It has been reported that
2-receptor stimulation can produce renal vasoconstriction and inhibit sodium and water excretion,30 an effect opposite those found in the present study. More consistent with the results of the present study, several genetic hypertensive rat models (spontaneously hypertensive, Dahl salt-sensitive, and Sabra rats) have been reported to exhibit markedly increased density of renal
2-receptors,30 which could represent compensatory changes in response to hypertension. Genetic linkage analyses have failed to demonstrate a cosegregation of
2-receptors with blood pressure in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. This observation also suggests that the increased receptor density might represent an antihypertensive compensatory mechanism31 in the same manner that the
2-receptors respond after stimulation with NE in the present study. Taken together, we would propose that renal medullary
2-receptors exert a negative-feedback controller against the hypertensive effects of NE. Blockade of the medullary
2-receptors made NE unable to increase renal medullary NOS enzyme activity, and the lack of this important counterregulatory mechanism resulted in NE-induced hypertension. The present results provide the first evidence for a direct connection between renal medullary
2-receptors and arterial blood pressure.
We conclude that the hypertensive effects of moderate elevations of renal adrenergic activity can be chronically offset by
2-receptormediated stimulation of NOS activity within the renal medulla. The
2-receptormediated increase in NOS activity in this region of the kidney appears to buffer reductions of MBF mediated by
1-receptors and by the vasoconstrictor effects of NE and serves as a potent protective mechanism against the hypertensive effects of NE.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 14, 1999; first decision October 11, 1999; accepted October 26, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Sai Y, Silldorf EP. Pallone TL. Effect of norepinephrine and acetylcholine on outer medullary descending vasa recta. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H710H716.
3.
Cowley AW Jr, Mattson DL, Lu S, Roman RJ. The renal medulla and hypertension. Hypertension. 1995;25:663673.
4.
Cowley AW Jr. Role of the renal medulla in volume and arterial pressure regulation. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:R1R15.
5.
Roman RJ, Zou AP. Influence of the renal medullary circulation on the control of sodium excretion. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:R963R973.
6.
Mattson DL, Lu S, Nakanishi K, Papanek E, Cowley AW Jr. Effect of chronic renal medullary nitric oxide inhibition on blood pressure. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1918H1926.
7.
Nakanishi K, Mattson DL, Cowley AW Jr. Role of renal medullary blood flow in the development of L-NAME hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R317R323.
8. Cowley AW Jr, Skelton MM, Kurth TM. Effects of long-term vasopressin receptor stimulation on medullary blood flow and arterial blood pressure. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:R1420R1424.
9.
Szentiványi M Jr, Maeda CY, Cowley AW Jr. Local renal medullary L-NAME infusion enhances the effect of chronic angiotensin-II treatment. Hypertension. 1999;33:440445.
10. Szentiványi M Jr, Park F, Maeda CY, Cowley AW Jr. Nitric oxide in the renal medulla protects from vasopressin-induced hypertension. Hypertension. In press.
11. Vanhoutte PM, Miller VM. Alpha-2 adrenoceptors and endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Am J Med. 1989;87:1S5S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Wu F, Park F, Cowley AW Jr, Mattson DL. Quantification of nitric oxide synthase activity in microdissected segments of the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:F874F881.
13. Lu S, Mattson DL, Roman RJ, Becker CG, Cowley AW Jr. Assessment of changes in intrarenal blood flow in conscious rat using laser-Doppler flowmetry. Am J Physiol. 1993;246:F956F962.
14. Kleinjans J, Kasbergen C, Vervoort-Peters L, Smits J, Struyker Boudier HAJ. Chronic intravenous infusion of noradrenaline produces labile hypertension in conscious rats. Life Sci.. 1981;29:509514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Zou AP, Wu F, Cowley AW Jr. Protective effect of angiotensin IIinduced increase in nitric oxide in the renal medullary circulation. Hypertension. 1998;31:271276.
16. Hermansson K, Ojte GG, Wolgast M. The cortical and medullary blood flow at different blood levels of renal nerve activity. Acta Physiol Scand. 1984;120:161169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Park F, Zou AP, Cowley AW Jr. Arginine vasopressinmediated stimulation of nitric oxide within the rat renal medulla. Hypertension. 1998;32:896901.
18.
Hennington BS, Zhang H, Miller MT, Granger JP, Reckelhoff JF. Angiotensin II stimulates synthesis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Hypertension. 1998;31:283288.
19. Simonian SX, Herbison AE. Localization of neuronal nitric oxide synthase-immunoreactivity within sub-populations of noradrenergic A1 and A2 neurons in the rat. Brain Res. 1996;732:247252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Mattson DL, Bellehumeur TG. Neural nitric oxide synthase in the renal medulla and blood pressure regulation. Hypertension. 1996;28:297303.
21.
Thorin E, Huang PL, Fishman MC, Bevan JA. Nitric oxide inhibits alpha-2 adrenoceptor mediated endothelium dependent vasodilation. Circ Res. 1998;82:13231329.
22.
Ishibashi Y, Duncker DJ, Beche RJ. Endogenous nitric oxide masks
2-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction during exercise in the ischemic heart. Circ Res. 1997;80:196207.
23. Lembo G, Iaccarino G, Vecchione C, Barbato E, Izzo R, Fontana D, Trimarco B. Insulin modulation of an endothelial nitric oxide component present in the alpha-2 and beta adrenergic responses in human forearm. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:20072014.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Liao JK, Homcy CJ. The release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor via alpha-2 adrenergic receptor activation is specifically mediated by Gi alpha2. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1952819533.
25. Thompson SC, Vallon V. Alpha-2 adrenoceptors determine the response to nitric oxide inhibition in the rat glomerulus and proximal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:14821490.[Abstract]
26.
Kanagy NL. Increased vesicular responsiveness to alpha-2 adrenergic stimulation during NOS inhibition-induced hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H2756H2764.
27.
Lu S, Mattson DL, Cowley AW Jr. Renal medullary captopril delivery lowers blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1994;23:337345.
28. Vallon V, Peterson OW, Gabbai FB, Blantz RC, Thompson SC. Interactive control of renal function by alpha-2 adrenergic system and nitric oxide: role of angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:916922.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Intengan HD Smyth DD. Alpha-2a/d adrenoceptor subtype stimulation by guanfacine increases osmolar clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;281:4853.
30.
Pettinger WA. Renal alpha-2 receptors and hypertension. Hypertension. 1987;9:36.
31. Ginn DI, Baptista CA, Alam KY, Deng AY, Dene H, Le H, Kurtz W, Rapp JP. Genetic analysis of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors and blood pressure using Dahl salt-sensitive rats. J Hypertens. 1994;12:357365.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Cao, K. Payne, W. Lee-Kwon, Z. Zhang, S. W. Lim, J. Hamlyn, M. P. Blaustein, H. M. Kwon, and T. L. Pallone Chronic ouabain treatment induces vasa recta endothelial dysfunction in the rat Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): F98 - F106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zagorac, K. Yamaura, C. Zhang, R. J. Roman, and D. R. Harder The Effect of Superoxide Anion on Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2589 - 2594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. McCormick, E. M. Bravo, and C. T. Kappagoda Role of adrenergic receptors in the reflex diuresis in rabbits during pulmonary lymphatic obstruction Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 341 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Cowley Jr., T. Mori, D. Mattson, and A.-P. Zou Role of renal NO production in the regulation of medullary blood flow Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): R1355 - R1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rhinehart, C. A. Handelsman, E. P. Silldorff, and T. L. Pallone ANG II AT2 receptor modulates AT1 receptor-mediated descending vasa recta endothelial Ca2+ signaling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): H779 - H789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hoagland, K. G. Maier, and R. J. Roman Contributions of 20-HETE to the Antihypertensive Effects of Tempol in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 697 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Pallone, Z. Zhang, and K. Rhinehart Physiology of the renal medullary microcirculation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): F253 - F266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Mattson Importance of the renal medullary circulation in the control of sodium excretion and blood pressure Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R13 - R27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, S. A. Falk, S. Jittikanont, P. E. Gengaro, C. L. Edelstein, and R. W. Schrier Protective effect of renal denervation on normotensive endotoxemia-induced acute renal failure in mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): F583 - F587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishimatsu, Y. Hirata, T. Shindo, H. Kurihara, M. Kakoki, D. Nagata, H. Hayakawa, H. Satonaka, M. Sata, A. Tojo, et al. Role of Endogenous Adrenomedullin in the Regulation of Vascular Tone and Ischemic Renal Injury: Studies on Transgenic/Knockout Mice of Adrenomedullin Gene Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 657 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Plato and J. L. Garvin alpha 2-Adrenergic-mediated tubular NO production inhibits thick ascending limb chloride absorption Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F679 - F686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Lohmeier, J. R. Lohmeier, J. F. Reckelhoff, and D. A. Hildebrandt Sustained influence of the renal nerves to attenuate sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): R434 - R443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Setty, J. D. Tune, and H. F. Downey Nitric oxide modulates right ventricular flow and oxygen consumption during norepinephrine infusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H696 - H703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishimatsu, Y. Hirata, T. Shindo, H. Kurihara, M. Kakoki, D. Nagata, H. Hayakawa, H. Satonaka, M. Sata, A. Tojo, et al. Role of Endogenous Adrenomedullin in the Regulation of Vascular Tone and Ischemic Renal Injury: Studies on Transgenic/Knockout Mice of Adrenomedullin Gene Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 657 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |