Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2000;35:496-500

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other etiology

(Hypertension. 2000;35:496.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Socioeconomic Status and Blood Pressure Reactivity in Healthy Black Adolescents

Dawn K. Wilson; Wendy Kliewer; Laura Plybon; Domenic A. Sica

From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension (D.K.W., D.A.S.), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, and the Department of Psychology (W.K., L.P.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Adolescents in low-socioeconomic-status environments are more susceptible to illnesses, such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. This study examined the influence of both neighborhood- and family-level socioeconomic status (SES) on blood pressure (BP) reactivity in a healthy sample of 76 black adolescents. It was hypothesized that a higher level of parental education and/or income would reduce the elevated BP reactivity associated with living in poorer neighborhoods. Census-derived data were obtained using each participant’s address. Neighborhood level of SES was based on percentage of households below the poverty line, female-headed households, owner-occupied housing, percentage vacant housing, and average number of persons per household. Family level of SES was based on self-reported level of parental education and annual family income. Adolescents participated in a competitive video game to establish their BP reactivity scores. As predicted, adolescents who lived in poorer neighborhoods had lower diastolic BPs if their parents were more (versus less) educated (P<0.05; 7±8 versus 13±6 mm Hg). Adolescents who lived in poorer neighborhoods also had significantly lower diastolic BP reactivity (P<0.05) if their family had a higher (versus lower) annual income (7±7 versus 12±8 mm Hg). These data are the first to demonstrate the buffering effect of family SES on the negative health consequences of living in low-SES neighborhoods in healthy black adolescents.


Key Words: cardiovascular reactivity • social economic status • education • adolescents


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Neighborhoods affect individuals’ physical health, in part because communities vary in the prevalence and intensity of stressors and resources. Environmental stressors such as noise, overcrowding, and violence, or economic stressors such as chronic poverty, may abound in inner-city neighborhoods, which may in turn influence essential hypertension (EH) and related health outcomes in children and youth.1 2 Anderson et al3 have proposed a contextual model of EH which suggests that exposure to chronic stressors interacts with biological, behavioral, and psychological risk factors to increase sympathetic nervous system activity. The repeated stressor-induced episodes of vascular reactivity from chronic stress may lead to structural changes in the vascular wall, which in turn elevate blood pressure (BP) responses. Although there is controversy concerning the predictive value of BP reactivity,4 5 several prospective studies have shown that increased BP reactivity to mental stress is predictive of the later development of EH.6 7

Recent research linking neighborhood social economic status (SES) to BP reactivity is equivocal. For example, Gump et al8 found that black youth living in lower- (versus higher-) SES neighborhoods showed greater BP reactivity to laboratory stressors. In contrast, Jackson and colleagues9 found that black adolescents living in higher-SES neighborhoods had higher systolic BP (SBP) reactivity to a series of laboratory stressors than black adolescents living in lower-SES neighborhoods. These disparate findings may reflect a lack of attention to the interaction of family-level resources with neighborhood SES. Youths who reside in neighborhoods that are more disadvantaged may be buffered from negative health effects because of family-level resources. Parental education and/or income, in particular, may protect children from the negative health consequences of living in low-SES neighborhoods. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of both neighborhood- and family-level SES on BP reactivity in a healthy sample of black adolescents. Specifically, it was predicted that a higher level of parental education and/or income would reduce the elevated BP reactivity associated with living in poorer neighborhoods in a sample of healthy black adolescents.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University and the University of Tennessee, Memphis, and LeBonheur Children’s Medical Center. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and the adolescents before participation. The procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines. Black adolescents, aged 13 to 16 years, were recruited from schools and churches and through local recreation centers. Each child participated in a health screening conducted by a trained nurse. The screening included a BP assessment, a urine specimen (to rule out hematuria, glucosuria, or proteinuria), and the measurement of height (in centimeters) and weight (in kilograms). Only normotensive adolescents who did not have preexisting cardiovascular or chronic disease and who were not currently taking medications (including oral contraceptives) were allowed to participate in the study. The definition of high BP10 in the present study was 136/86 mm Hg for 13- to 15-year-olds and 142/92 mm Hg for 16-year-olds. All participants were within 25% of ideal weight for their height. A total of 76 healthy adolescents participated in the study. There were 35 males and 41 females in the study sample. Table 1 provides demographic and baseline information for the entire sample.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline and Demographic Measures for the Entire Sample

Procedures
Subjects arrived at the Clinical Research Center, where they participated in the health screening described above. Next, the parent and adolescent participants completed demographic questionnaires. Each participant’s casual BP was measured by a trained technician with a Dinamap BP apparatus (Critikon Inc), as outlined by the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children.10 During the BP assessments, subjects were seated in a relaxed position with their legs uncrossed, and the proper cuff size was selected for each subject. For all participants, the BP cuff was placed on the nondominant arm throughout the BP testing. Before BP assessment, 1 BP measurement was obtained for each subject and was compared with a sphygmomanometer reading to ensure accuracy. Only subjects whose SBPs agreed within ±5 mm Hg by these 2 methods were included in the study. After a 5-minute rest period, a total of 5 SBP, diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate (HR) measurements were taken, with a 30-second interval between readings. The average of these 5 measurements was used as the casual BP value for the data analyses. Next, each child participated in a competitive video game to determine his or her BP reactivity score.

Demographic and Background Information
The parents provided information on family history of EH and related illnesses. Parents indicated in a yes/no format whether anyone in the child’s immediate family (father, mother, brother, sister, grandparents, uncles, and aunts) had hypertension, had died of a stroke or heart attack before the age of 50 years, or had died suddenly because of natural causes. To assess parental level of education, respondents indicated the highest level of education that the head of the household (the person who financially supported the family) had completed, as follows: 1, <eighth grade; 2, eighth grade; 3, some high school; 4, high school graduate; 5, some college; 6, college graduate; and 7, professional or graduate school. The parents also indicated their total annual family income on a scale ranging from 1 to 7: 1, <$10 000; 2, $10 000 to $19 999; 3, $20 000 to $29 999; 4, $30 000 to $39 999; 5, $40 000 to $49 999; 6, $50 000 to 59 999; and 7, >=$60 000. Parents also provided information on whether they were currently married, separated/divorced, or widowed.

Calculation of Neighborhood SES
Census-derived data were obtained by use of the participants’ address and corresponding census track. In this study population, 43 census tracks from the Memphis, Tenn, and Richmond, Va, metropolitan areas were represented. For the census track of each participant, the following data were included: the percentage of households below the poverty line, the percentage of female-headed households with children aged <18 years, the percentage of owner-occupied housing, the percentage of vacant housing, and the average number of persons per household. Median household income was not used because it correlated highly with the percentage of households below the poverty line and the percentage of female-headed households with children aged <18 years. The indicators selected in the present study are consistent with those used in other studies of neighborhood effects.8 11 12 13

A cluster analysis procedure was used with the above 5 indicators to derive neighborhood SES types. The advantage of using a cluster approach rather than treating neighborhood factors individually is that the combined contextual effects of these factors may be captured more effectively. All 76 cases were used in the cluster analysis. A hierarchical agglomerative method (Ward’s method)14 with squared euclidean distance as the distance measure was used to cluster participants on the basis of the qualities of their neighborhood. SPSS-X (SPSS, Inc) was used for this analysis. Ward’s method is designed to optimize the minimum variance within the clusters. Based on inspection of the dendrogram and the coefficients in the agglomeration schedule, a 2-group solution was identified (low- versus high-SES neighborhoods).

Calculation of Family SES
A median split on parental education was used to determine a low and a high category. The low parental education category consisted of response of 1 to 4, which reflected having obtained less than an eighth grade education through having finished high school. The high parental education category consisted of a response of 5 to 7, which reflected having obtained some college education through having a profession or a graduate degree. A median split on annual family income was determined to derive a low and high category. The low annual income category consisted of a response of 1 to 3, which reflected an income of <$30 000 per year. The high annual income category consisted of a response of 4 to 7, which reflected an income of >=$30 000 per year.

BP Reactivity Testing
The competitive video game procedure has been previously described in detail.15 16 17 Each participant was seated in front of a 25-inch color television monitor. Next, 4 resting SBP, DBP, and HR readings were taken by a trained technician. The television monitor was turned on and the subject was given standard instructions for the Atari game "Breakout." Each participant was provided with a brief practice session to allow familiarization with the game. In game 1 (personal challenge), participants were told to see how well they could do. In game 2 (experimenter challenge), they were told they did pretty well in game 1 but to try harder this time. In game 3 (monetary incentive), they were told they could earn some money if they beat their higher score obtained in games 1 and 2. Participants were not told how much money they could earn, but were paid 5 cents to 5 dollars, depending on their performance. During each game, 1 measurement each of SBP, DBP, and HR was taken 30 seconds after the participant began playing the game. A 5-minute recovery followed the video game task; however, no other rest period was provided for the participants during the entire reactivity task. Average resting and stress BP and HR values were calculated across the 3 games. BP and HR reactivity scores were determined by calculating baseline-stress change scores.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subject Characteristics
Table 1 presents demographic and baseline characteristics for the sample. There were no significant group differences on demographic or baseline measures. As expected, there were significant effects for both education and annual income of family-level SES variables (P<0.001 for both).

Neighborhood SES Census Data
Table 2 displays the means for each SES neighborhood group (high versus low) on the 5 variables composing the analysis. As seen in Table 2, the low-SES neighborhood group had an average of 3 times as many households living below the poverty line, more than twice the percentage of female-headed households with minor children, half as many owner-occupied housing units, and nearly 3 times the number of vacant housing units relative to the high-SES neighborhood group. The average number of persons per household was not significantly different across the 2 neighborhood types.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Census Track Descriptive Information for Neighborhood SES Classifications

To provide evidence for the validity of the cluster solution, the clusters were compared on variables not used to create the clusters, as recommended by Aldenderfer and Blashfield.14 These variables included median household income (census level) and annual family income (household level). The census-level household incomes of participants living in the lower-SES neighborhoods were roughly half those of participants living in the higher-SES neighborhoods ($28 175± $7185 versus $14 763± $5069, P<0.001). Annual family income (household level) was also significantly lower in the lower- (versus higher-) SES neighborhood (P<0.05). Fifty-nine percent of families in the lower-SES neighborhoods versus 37% of families in higher-SES neighborhoods had annual incomes of <$30 000 (P<0.05).

Cardiovascular Reactivity Measures
A series of ANCOVAs, controlling for Quetelet Index and family history of EH, were performed to determine the impact of neighborhood SES and parental education on BP reactivity. The independent variables were neighborhood SES (high versus low) and parental education level (high versus low). The 2x2 ANCOVA indicated a significant interaction effect for DBP reactivity (P<0.05; Figure 1). As predicted, adolescents who lived in lower-SES neighborhoods had lower DBP reactivity if their parents were more (versus less) educated. There were no significant effects for SBP reactivity (low SES, low education (EDU): 14±9 mm Hg; low SES, high EDU: 9±7 mm Hg; high SES, low EDU: 9±8 mm Hg; high SES, high EDU: 11±7 mm Hg) or HR reactivity (low SES, low EDU: 10±9 bpm; low SES, high EDU: 4±10 bpm; high SES, low EDU: 3±7 bpm; high SES, high EDU: 5±8 bpm).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. DBP reactivity change scores separated by level of neighborhood SES and parental education.

A series of ANCOVAs controlling for Quetelet Index and family history of EH were also performed to determine the impact of neighborhood SES and annual family income on BP reactivity. The independent variables were neighborhood SES (high versus low) and annual family income (high versus low). The 2x2 ANCOVA indicated a significant interaction effect for DBP reactivity (P<0.05; Figure 2). Adolescents who lived lower-SES neighborhoods had significantly lower DBP reactivity if their family had a higher (versus lower) family income. There were no significant effects for SBP reactivity (low SES, low income (INC): 11±9 mm Hg; low SES, high INC: 11±9 mm Hg; high SES, low INC: 9±9 mm Hg; high SES, high INC: 11±6 mm Hg) or HR reactivity (low SES, low INC: 8±9 bpm; low SES, high INC: 7±12 bpm; high SES, low INC: 1±8 bpm; high SES, high INC: 6±7 bpm).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. DBP reactivity change scores separated by level of neighborhood SES and annual family income.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrates that adolescents in lower-SES neighborhoods had lower DBP reactivity if their parents had a higher education level (at least some college) rather than lower educational level (high school graduate or less). Adolescents who lived in lower-SES neighborhoods also had lower DBP reactivity if their annual family income was higher (>=$30 000) rather than lower (<$30 000). These data are the first to demonstrate the protective effect of family SES factors on the negative health consequences (elevated BP reactivity) of living in low-SES neighborhoods in a sample of healthy black adolescents.

The findings in the present study are consistent with other studies which have demonstrated that higher parental education is associated with better mental health outcomes in children and higher levels of family support. Kliewer and colleagues18 examined the influence of maternal education on psychological symptoms among 99 families from low-income, high-violence areas in Richmond, Va. Their study demonstrated that higher (versus lower) maternal education was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety and a greater feeling of availability to talk with parents about stressful life events. Kliewer and Kung19 also reported that higher maternal education was associated with greater levels of family cohesion (ie, support, emotional availability). Additional studies20 21 provide evidence for the direct effects of low parental education on behavioral problems in children. Overall, these studies suggest that parents with higher education levels, as in the present study, may have provided their children with encouragement that helped them to better cope with the stresses associated with living in lower-SES neighborhoods.

Another potential explanation for the protective effect of family SES factors on the negative health consequences of living in low-SES neighborhoods may be in part due to greater health awareness and positive health behaviors among the families of higher educated parents. Consistent with this interpretation, previous studies have demonstrated that higher family-level SES was associated with more positive health behaviors, such as improved diet,22 better fitness, and lower prevalence of tobacco smoking among adolescents.2 Further research is needed to determine whether this association between family-level SES and positive health behaviors mediates BP reactivity in children who live in lower-SES neighborhoods.

The present study also indicates that adolescents in low-SES neighborhoods with fewer (versus more) family SES resources had higher levels of DBP reactivity. These findings are consistent with other studies which have shown that children are adversely affected by chronic environmental stressors.23 Anderson et al3 have proposed a contextual model for investigating stress-induced BP reactivity in blacks. The model suggests that the exaggerated peripheral vascular reactivity observed in many blacks is a function of a wider array of chronic stressors than those seen in their white counterparts. These chronic stressors (such as low-SES neighborhoods) interact with biological, behavioral, and psychological risk factors to increase sympathetic nervous system activity. Over time, the repeated stressor-induced episodes of vascular reactivity may lead to structural changes in the vascular wall, and subsequent development of EH. In support of this model, previous research has demonstrated that chronic social and environmental stressors (eg, low SES) are associated with an increased rate of EH among blacks.24 25 Research from animal and human laboratory studies has also demonstrated that exposure to uncontrollable stress may augment resting sympathetic nervous system tone; enhance sympathetic reactivity to acute, novel stressors; and elevate plasma levels of catecholamines.26 27 28 29 30 Taken together, the above studies suggest that adolescents in lower-SES neighborhoods with few family SES resources may be at particularly high risk for developing EH and other cardiovascular complications in early adulthood.

In the present study the observation that the effects of neighborhood- and family-level SES variables were more reliable for DBP than SBP reactivity may not be surprising. Previous studies have demonstrated that elevated vascular reactivity (ie, DBP reactivity and vascular resistance) is more prevalent among blacks than whites.3 31 32 33 34 Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that total peripheral resistance and norepinephrine responses to stress are greater in offspring of hypertensive than normotensive individuals.35 36 These studies suggest that the presence of preclinical changes in vascular reactivity are most likely linked to heightened sympathetic nervous system activity. Although the present study did not assess plasma hormones, adolescents in low-SES neighborhoods may have elevated DBP reactivity in response to heightened sympathetic nervous system activation and elevated peripheral resistance.

There are several limitations to the present study. First, the study is based on cross-sectional data rather than longitudinal data. Thus, no direct causal interpretations can be made. Further research is needed to determine the causal relationships between neighborhood SES, family SES, and BP reactivity. A second limitation of the present study is the small sample size used, which limits the generalizability of the study. Although these data represent only 2 inner-city locations in the southern United States, further research is needed to see whether other similar demographic locations would reproduce similar findings.

In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate the buffering effect of family SES factors on the negative health consequences (elevated BP reactivity) of living in low-SES neighborhoods in a sample of healthy black adolescents. Early environmental life experiences impact BP reactivity in normotensive black adolescents and may be critical determinants for the expression of the hypertension phenotype. Because of the long-term health implications of chronic environmental stressors, understanding how community and family factors may affect children’s BP responses should be a major focus of future research.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This project was supported by a FIRST Award grant (HL-46736) from the National Institutes of Health (D.K.W.) and a GCRC grant (M01RR00065) at Virginia Commonwealth University.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dawn K. Wilson, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension, Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia, PO Box 980160, Richmond, VA 23298-0160.

Received September 14, 1999; first decision October 21, 1999; accepted November 10, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88:1973–1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bergstrom E, Hernell O, Persson LA. Cardiovascular risk indicators cluster in girls from families of low socio-economic status. Acta Pediatr. 1996;85:1083–1090.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Myers H. Toward understanding race differences in autonomic reactivity: a proposed contextual model. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light K, eds. Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Responses to Stress: Applications to Models of Cardiovascular Disease. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1992:125–146.

4. Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Muldoon MF. Behaviorally-evoked cardiovascular reactivity and hypertension: conceptual issues and potential associations. Ann Behav Med. 1990;12:17–29.

5. Pickering TG, Gerin W. Cardiovascular reactivity in the laboratory and the role of behavioral factors in hypertension: A critical review. Ann Behav Med. 1990;12:3–16.

6. Falkner B, Kushner H, Onesti G, Angelakos ET. Cardiovascular characteristics in adolescents who develop essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1981;3:521–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Borghi C, Costa FV, Boschi S, Mussi A, Ambrosioni E. Predictors of stable hypertension in young borderline subjects: a five-year follow-up study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:S138–S141.

8. Gump BR, Matthews KA, Raikkonen K. Modeling relationships among socioeconomic status, hostility, cardiovascular reactivity and left ventricular mass in African American and white children. Health Psychol. 1999;18:140–150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Jackson RW, Treiber FA, Turner JR, Davis H, Stong WB. Effects of race, sex, and socioeconomic status upon cardiovascular stress responsivity and recovery in youth. Int J Psychophysiol. 1993;31:111–119.

10. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Pediatrics. 1996;98:649–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Allison KW, Burton L, Marshall S, Perez-Febles A, Yarrington J, Kirsh LB, Merriwether-DeVries C. Life experiences among urban adolescents: examining the role of context. Child Dev. 1999;70:1017–1029.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Kupersmidt JB, Griesler PC, DeRosier ME, Patterson CJ, Davis PW. Childhood aggression and peer relations in the context of family and neighborhood factors. Child Dev. 1995;66:360–375.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Wandersman A, Nation M. Urban neighborhoods and mental health: psychological contributions to understanding toxicity, resilience, and interventions. Am Psychol. 1998;53:647–656.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK. Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1984.

15. Murphy JK, Alpert BS, Moes DM, Somes GW. Race and cardiovascular reactivity: a neglected relationship. Hypertension. 1986;8:1075–1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Murphy JK, Alpert BS, Walker SS, Willey ES. Race and cardiovascular reactivity: a replication. Hypertension. 1988;11:308–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Murphy JK, Alpert BS, Willey ES, Somes GW. Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in healthy children. Psychophysiology. 1988;25:144–152.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Kliewer W, Lepore SJ, Oskin D, Johnson PD. The role of social and cognitive processes in children’s adjustment to community violence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:199–209.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Kliewer W, Kung E. Family moderators of the relation between hassles and behavior problems in inner-city youth. J Clin Child Psychol. 1998;27:278–292.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Patterson CJ, Kupersmidt JB, Vaden NA. Income level, gender, ethnicity, and household composition as predictors of children’s school-based competencies. Child Dev. 1990;61:485–494.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Rutter M. The city and the child. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1981;51:610–625.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Ganguli MC, Grimm RH, Svendsen KH, Flack JM, Grandits GA, Elmer PJ. Higher education and income are related to a better Na:K ratio in blacks: baseline results of the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) data. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:979–984.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Cohen S, Glass SC, Phillip S. Environment and health. In: Freeman HE, Levine S, Reeder LG, eds. Handbook of Medical Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1978:134–149.

24. Harburg E, Erfurt JC, Chape C, Hauenstein LS, Schull WJ, Schork MA. Socioecological stressor areas and black-white blood pressure: Detroit. J Chron Dis. 1973;26:595–611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Race, education and prevalence of hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:351–361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Baum A, Gatchel RJ, Schaeffer MA. Emotional, behavioral, and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island. J Consul Clin Psychol. 1983;51:565–572.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Davidson LM, Fleming R, Baum A. Chronic stress, catecholamines, and sleep disturbance at Three Mile Island. J Hum Stress. 1987;13:75–83.

28. Koepke JP, DiBona GF. High sodium intake enhances renal nerve and antinatriuretic responses to stress in SHR. Hypertension. 1985;7:357–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Koepke JP, Light KC, Obrist PA. Neural control of renal excretory function during behavioral stress in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:R251–R258.

30. McCarthy R, Horwatt K, Konarska M. Chronic stress and sympathetic-adrenal medullary responsiveness. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:333–341.

31. Anderson NB, Lane J, Taguchi F, Williams RB Jr, Houseworth SJ. Race, parental history of hypertension, and patterns of cardiovascular reactivity in women. Psychophysiology. 1989;6:39–47.

32. Treiber FA, Musante L, Braden D, Arensman F, Strong WB, Levy M, Leverett S. Racial differences in hemodynamic responses to the cold face stimulus in children and adults. Psychosom Med. 1990;52:286–296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Light KC, Obrist PA, Sherwood A, James SA, Strogatz DS. Effects of race and marginally elevated blood pressure on cardiovascular responses to stress in young men. Hypertension. 1987;10:555–563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Anderson NB, Lane JD, Muranaka M, Williams RB Jr, Houseworth SJ. Racial differences in blood pressure and forearm vascular responses to the cold face stimulus. Psychosom Med. 1988;50:57–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Stamler R, Stamler J, Riedlinger WF, Algera G, Roberts RH. Family (parental) history and prevalence of hypertension: results of a nationwide screening program. JAMA. 1979;241:43–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Treiber FA, McCaffrey F, Musante L, Rhodes T, Davis H, Strong WB, Levy M. Ethnicity, family history of hypertension and patterns of hemodynamic reactivity in boys. Psychosom Med. 1993;55:70–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. B. Williams, D. A. Marchuk, I. C. Siegler, J. C. Barefoot, M. J. Helms, B. H. Brummett, R. S. Surwit, J. D. Lane, C. M. Kuhn, K. M. Gadde, et al.
Childhood Socioeconomic Status and Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism Enhance Cardiovascular Reactivity to Mental Stress
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. Shankaran, A. Das, C. R. Bauer, H. Bada, B. Lester, L. Wright, R. Higgins, and K. Poole
Fetal origin of childhood disease: intrauterine growth restriction in term infants and risk for hypertension at 6 years of age.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2006; 160(9): 977 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
A. F. Brown, S. L. Ettner, J. Piette, M. Weinberger, E. Gregg, M. F. Shapiro, A. J. Karter, M. Safford, B. Waitzfelder, P. A. Prata, et al.
Socioeconomic Position and Health among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature
Epidemiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 63 - 77.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. C. Dekkers, F. A. Treiber, G. Kapuku, and H. Snieder
Differential Influence of Family History of Hypertension and Premature Myocardial Infarction on Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass Trajectories in Youth
Pediatrics, June 1, 2003; 111(6): 1387 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Steptoe and M. Marmot
The role of psychobiological pathways in socio-economic inequalities in cardiovascular disease risk
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 13 - 25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Lucini, G. Norbiato, M. Clerici, and M. Pagani
Hemodynamic and Autonomic Adjustments to Real Life Stress Conditions in Humans
Hypertension, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other etiology