(Hypertension. 2000;35:76.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Clinical Research Center, Department of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn, and the Jacob Recanati Autonomic Dysfunction Center (G.J.), Department of Internal Medicine C, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Correspondence to Italo Biaggioni, MD, AA3228 MCN, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-2195. E-mail italo.biaggioni{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced vasoconstriction, respectively.
ß-Mediated vasodilation was significantly lower in legs compared with
arms. Thus, we report a dissociation between norepinephrine
spillover and vascular responses to cold stress in lower limbs
characterized by a paradoxical decrease in local resistance despite
increases in sympathetic activity. The differences observed in
adrenergic receptor responses cannot explain this phenomenon.
Key Words: autonomic nervous system norepinephrine receptors, adrenergic vasodilation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A second layer of complexity is introduced by the apparent dissociation observed in some instances between sympathetic activation, regional norepinephrine spillover, and their corresponding change in vascular tone. For instance, muscle sympathetic nerve activity was found to be similar in both arms and legs at rest,2 whereas a lower norepinephrine spillover has been found in legs compared with arms.3 Sustained handgrip causes vasoconstriction in legs but vasodilation in the contralateral arm,4 whereas sympathetic nerve activity increases similarly in both radial and peroneal nerve during this stimulus.2 Differential vascular responses to other stimuli, such as mental stress test, local ischemia, and coughing,1 have been reported when arms and legs are compared, but no data are available on simultaneous measurements of sympathetic activity.
It has been suggested that neurally mediated vasodilation may account
for the dissociation between increased sympathetic activity and the
paradoxical vasodilation. Another potential explanation of these
findings may lie in the receptors that mediate vascular responses to
sympathetic activation and, in particular, in the balance between
-mediated vasoconstriction and ß-mediated vasodilation. There are
several studies exploring local vascular adrenergic receptor function
in the forearm, but we are not aware of similar studies in lower
limbs.
The present study was design to examine the differential effect of
central sympathetic activation on arms and legs and the vascular
consequences of this activation. We used cold stimulation (immersion of
a hand in ice water) as a sympathetic stimulus and measured the degree
of both sympathetic activation (regional norepinephrine
spillover) and vascular responses (vascular resistance
measurements) on arms and legs. We used the hypotensive effects of
nitroprusside as a control stimulus to induce baroreflex-mediated
sympathetic activation. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that the
diversities in local vascular responses between the extremities could
be in part due to dissimilarities in local adrenergic receptor
responses. For this purpose, we measured the local vascular responses
to intra-arterial infusions of ß2-
and
1-adrenergic receptor agonists in arms and
legs.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects were studied after at least 3 days on a diet containing 150 mEq Na+ and 70 mEq K+ per day that was free of caffeine and low in monoamines. This diet resulted in urinary sodium of 121±4 mEq/24 hours and urinary potassium of 58±3 mEq/24 hours. All subjects were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center at Vanderbilt University and studied while they were supine after an overnight fast.
Protocols
Local and Systemic Norepinephrine Spillover
and Clearance
A brachial artery, the ipsilateral femoral vein, and 2 large
antecubital veins were catheterized. The arterial line was
connected though a 3-way valve to a pressure transducer (DT-4812,
Omheda). One port was dedicated to blood sampling, and the second was
dedicated to flushing with heparinized saline. Access to one
antecubital vein was dedicated to drug and tritiated
norepinephrine ([3H]NE) infusion,
and the contralateral vein and the femoral catheters were dedicated to
blood sampling (ipsilateral to the flow measurement). ECG and
arterial blood pressure were monitored on signal
conditioners (Gould).
After instrumentation, the subject rested quietly for at least 30 minutes. [3H]NE was prepared and infused as described previously.5 Blood samples for norepinephrine spillover were taken simultaneously from the brachial artery, the femoral vein, and an antecubital vein. Forearm and calf blood flow was measured by use of venous occlusion plethysmography for 4 seconds at 8-second intervals as described previously.6 Vascular resistance was calculated as mean arterial blood pressure divided by blood flow and expressed in units of mm Hg · mL-1 · dL tissue-1 · min-1.
Norepinephrine spillover was assessed during
nitroprusside infusion and during cold stimulation. Nitroprusside was
infused intravenously at increasing doses for 5 minutes
each, starting at 0.1 µg · kg-1
· min-1, until a decrease in systolic
blood pressure of
20 mm Hg was achieved. The cold stimulation
was induced by submerging the hand contralateral to the flow
measurement in iced water (cold pressor test). Measurements were
performed during the last minute of nitroprusside infusion and during
the 60 to 90 seconds of the cold stimulation. At least 20 minutes
elapsed between each stimulus to allow parameters to return
to baseline. Separate baseline values of norepinephrine
spillover were determined before each intervention.
Local Adrenergic Receptor Sensitivity
After a 60-minute rest period, isoproterenol was infused
sequentially into the brachial and femoral arteries at increasing doses
(from 0 to 300 mg/min). Each dose of isoproterenol was infused for 5
minutes, and blood flow was recorded during the last minute. After
a 30-minute rest period, we measured the
vasoconstrictive effect of phenylephrine.
For this purpose, we first induced sustained vasodilation with
isoproterenol at individualized doses that induced
50% of maximal
vasodilation (20 to 40 mg/min for arms and 40 to 60 mg/min for legs).
After 15 minutes of this fixed dose of isoproterenol infusion,
phenylephrine was administered in increasing doses (0.2 to
12 µg/min). Dose-response curves were constructed, and the maximal
effect (Emax) and the dose of agonist producing
half-maximal effect (ED50) were extrapolated from
nonlinear regression of the individual curves. No attempt was made to
normalize the dose to the volume of the limb. It would be possible to
do this in the forearm, because drugs are infused directly into the
brachial artery irrigating the forearm. This, however, cannot be
applied to the leg, because flow is measured in the calf, but the
infusion is made in the femoral artery. Correction by volume would
require drug infusions into the popliteal artery. This limitation is
inherent to this technique and is discussed in detail
elsewhere.3
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Single comparisons within
and between groups were made by use of paired and unpaired 2-tailed
t tests, respectively. One-way ANOVA for repeated
measurement was used to assess dose-related effects. Nonlinear
regression analysis was performed for each dose-response curve.
Data were analyzed by use of GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software
Inc). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no significant differences in mean local blood flow or extraction fraction between arms and legs at baseline (Table 2). Nitroprusside infusion and cold pressor stimuli caused significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but extraction fraction and local blood flow did not change significantly, except for an increment in leg blood flow after cold pressor stimulus (paired t test, P=0.02; Table 2).
Systemic norepinephrine spillover increased significantly during nitroprusside infusion (by 80%) and during cold pressor stimuli (by 45%, Table 1). Systemic clearance did not change after nitroprusside infusion but tended to increase after cold stimulation (P=0.07).
Local Norepinephrine Spillover and
Clearance
Regional norepinephrine spillover was
significantly higher at baseline in arms (0.4±0.05 [range 0.2 to
0.69] mg · min-1 ·
dL-1) compared with legs (0.28±0.04 [range
0.17 to 0.5] mg · min-1 ·
dL-1, P<0.03; Figure 1b).
Similar findings have been reported previously.3 The
mean baseline norepinephrine clearances were similar in
both arms and legs (Table 2).
Norepinephrine spillover increased similarly in both arms and legs during nitroprusside infusion (by 0.24±0.08 and 0.24±0.07 mg · mL-1 · dL-1, respectively; Figure 2b). Norepinephrine spillover increased less during cold pressure stimuli, but the increase was similar in both extremities (by 0.15±0.05 and 0.13±0.05 mg · mL-1 · dL-1 in arms and legs, respectively; Figure 3b). Local norepinephrine clearances are shown in Table 2.
Local vascular resistance was lower in arms compared with legs at baseline (17±2 versus 27±5 U, P=0.06; Figure 1c). There was a significant correlation between regional norepinephrine spillover and vascular resistance in arms (r=0.75, P<0.02) and legs (r=0.75, P<0.04). Local vascular resistance decreased similarly in both arms and legs during nitroprusside infusion (to 13±2 and 20±30 U, paired t test 0.02 and 0.07 for arms and legs, respectively; Figure 2c). In contrast, during cold pressor stimuli, arm vascular resistance increased, whereas leg vascular resistance decreased (4±2 versus -2±1 U, P=0.02; see Figure 3c). In legs, the correlation between norepinephrine spillover and vascular resistance was maintained (r=0.8, P=0.02) during nitroprusside infusion but not during cold stimulation (r=0.6, P=NS). There was no correlation between the norepinephrine spillover and the local vascular resistance during both stimuli.
Local Adrenergic Receptor Sensitivity
Isoproterenol infusion resulted in an increase in forearm blood
flow (from 3.9±0.4 [range 2.3 to 6.2] mL/dL to 20±2 [range 9 to
27] mL/dL) and leg blood flow (from 4.5±9 [range 1.9 to 7]
mL/dL to 10±2 [range 2.7 to 13] mL/dL) in a dose-dependent fashion,
as illustrated in Figure 4a. The maximal
dilatory effect of ß2-adrenergic receptors
(Emax) was greater in arms than in legs (435%
versus 160%, Figure 4a).
|
Stable vasodilation was induced with a constant dose of isoproterenol.
The flow obtained after 10 to 15 minutes of infusion was 10±1 mL/dL in
arms and 6±0.9 mL/dL in legs. Phenylephrine caused a
vasoconstriction in a dose-response fashion in both arms and legs, as
shown in Figure 4b. The ED50 for
phenylephrine was 3-fold greater in legs than in arms. It
should be noted, however, that these differences can be explained by
the greater tissue volume of the legs, which is
3 times greater than
that of the arms.3
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is widely accepted that sympathetic activation to various stimuli is not uniformly distributed throughout the body and that some vascular beds may be spared of sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction. The mechanisms underlying this heterogeneous response are not completely understood and may occur at different levels of the organization of the sympathetic nervous system. Animal data indicate specific distribution of efferent nerve traffic to various organs depending on the afferent stimuli, suggesting the recruitment of discrete neural pathways.7
In humans, direct measurement of sympathetic nerve traffic is limited by its accessibility and, therefore, is mostly performed in the peroneal nerve in legs and the radial nerve of arms. It has been shown that mental stress evokes a significant increase in muscle sympathetic activity in the peroneal nerve but not in the radial nerve.8 On the other hand, lower body negative pressure elicited a similar response in both arms and legs.9 We are not aware of studies in which muscle sympathetic nerve activity has been measured in arms and legs during cold stimulation.
Because of limitations in nerve recording accessibility, most of the knowledge about differential sympathetic activation in humans is based either on regional norepinephrine spillover or on the functional consequences of sympathetic activation, namely, changes in regional vascular resistance. For example, mental stress appears to preferentially increase cardiac norepinephrine spillover,10 a phenomenon with obvious implications for stress-mediated cardiac abnormalities, including sudden death. On the other hand, aerobic exercise training reduces renal norepinephrine spillover but does not change cardiac spillover.11 To our knowledge, no data are available about differences in local norepinephrine spillover between arms and legs during any stress stimulus.
Rusch et al1 have studied extensively the effect of various stimuli on blood flow to arms and legs in humans. Mental stress and static handgrip elicited an increase in heart rate and blood pressure, and this was associated with an increase in forearm but not calf blood flow. These differences in vascular responses between arms and legs were postulated to be due to regional sympathetic cholinergic activation.
In the present study, we have used the combined approach of measuring regional norepinephrine spillover and changes in vascular tone. This approach generated unexpected findings. We found a dissociation between sympathetic activation and its functional correlate. Specifically, we found that cold pressor stimulus produced sympathetic activation in both arms and legs, as determined by regional norepinephrine spillover. This finding agrees with other studies showing an increase in leg muscle sympathetic nerve activity during cold pressor stimulus.12 13 In contrast, vascular resistance increased only in arms but not in legs. We are not aware of previous examples of an increase in norepinephrine spillover not associated with an increase in vascular resistance.
Sustained isometric handgrip increases sympathetic nerve traffic in both arms and legs2 even though it is accepted that this stimulus produces vasoconstriction in legs but vasodilation in the contralateral arm.4 Therefore, there is a precedent for a dissociation between sympathetic nerve traffic and vascular responses as seen in the present study. The mechanism that explains this dissociation is not known, but the possibility of sympathetically mediated vasodilation involving a nitric oxide mechanism has been proposed.14
In the present study, we investigated the possibility of a
differential end-organ responsiveness to adrenergic stimulation. We
found previously unreported differences in local adrenergic receptor
sensitivity between arms and legs. The relatively lower sensitivity of
1-adrenergic receptormediated
vasoconstriction in legs can be explained by differences in tissue
volume; therefore, the relevance of this finding is unclear. In this
regard, Streeten15 found no difference in venous
responsiveness to norepinephrine between hand and feet
veins in normal subjects. On the other hand, we found a decreased
efficacy of ß2-adrenergic receptormediated
vasodilation in legs. Postsynaptic vascular responses, therefore,
cannot explain the neural-vascular dissociation found in legs. The
significance of this finding was not explored in the present study,
but we speculate that the decreased sensitivity to ß-mediated
vasodilation in legs contributes to the maintenance of vascular
tone during the sympathetic activation associated with upright posture.
It is also interesting to note that, at rest,
norepinephrine spillover was lower in the leg than in
the arm, even though vascular resistance was higher. Taken together,
our data would suggest lesser sympathetic control of the
arterial circulation of legs compared with arms in humans.
Abnormalities in this putative defense mechanism may be of potential
relevance to disorders characterized by orthostatic
intolerance.16
In summary, we report a dissociation between changes in local norepinephrine spillover and vascular tone in legs in response to sympathetic activation evoked by cold stimulation. This dissociation was characterized by a paradoxical decrease in vascular resistance in the leg during cold stimulation, despite an increase in sympathetic activity. Legs were also less responsive to ß-mediated vasodilation. Therefore, the differences observed in adrenergic receptor responses cannot explain the neurovascular dissociation produced by cold stress in legs.
Received May 24, 1999; first decision June 8, 1999; accepted August 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Wallin BG, Victor RG, Mark AL. Sympathetic outflow to
resting muscles during static handgrip and postcontraction muscle
ischemia. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H105H110.
3.
Karlsson AK, Elam M, Lonnroth P, Sullivan L, Friberg
P. Differentiated norepinephrine spillover in human
skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:R16R21.
4.
Eklund B, Kaijser L. Effect of regional alpha- and
beta-adrenergic blockade on blood flow in the resting forearm during
contralateral isometric handgrip. J Physiol (Lond).. 1976;262:3950.
5.
Jacob G, Shannon JR, Costa F, Furlan R, Biaggioni I,
Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson RM, Robertson D. Abnormal
norepinephrine clearance and adrenergic receptor
sensitivity in idiopathic orthostatic intolerance.
Circulation. 1999;99:17061712.
6.
Costa F, Biaggioni I. Role of nitric oxide in
adenosine-induced vasodilation in humans.
Hypertension. 1998;31:10611064.
7. Scislo TJ, Augustyniak RA, OLeary DS. Differential arterial baroreflex regulation of renal, lumbar, and adrenal sympathetic nerve activity in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:R995R1002.
8. Anderson EA, Wallin BG, Mark AL. Dissociation of sympathetic nerve activity in arm and leg muscle during mental stress. Hypertension. 1987;9(suppl III):III-114III-119.
9.
Rea RF, Wallin BG. Sympathetic nerve activity in arm
and leg muscles during lower body negative pressure in humans.
J Appl Physiol. 1989;66:27782781.
10.
Wallin BG, Esler M, Dorward P, Eisenhofer G, Ferrier C,
Westerman R, Jennings G. Simultaneous measurements of
cardiac noradrenaline spillover and sympathetic outflow
to skeletal muscle in humans. J Physiol (Lond). 1992;453:4558.
11.
Meredith IT, Friberg P, Jennings GL, Dewar EM, Fazio
VA, Lambert GW, Esler MD. Exercise training lowers resting renal but
not cardiac sympathetic activity in humans. Hypertension. 1991;18:575582.
12.
Victor RG, Leimbach WNJ, Seals DR, Wallin BG, Mark AL.
Effects of the cold pressor test on muscle sympathetic nerve activity
in humans. Hypertension. 1987;9:429436.
13. Yamamoto K, Iwase S, Mano T. Responses of muscle sympathetic nerve activity and cardiac output to the cold pressor test. Jpn J Physiol. 1992;42:239252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Dietz NM, Engelke KA, Samuel TT, Fix RT, Joyner MJ.
Evidence for nitric oxide-mediated sympathetic forearm vasodilatation
in humans. J Physiol (Lond). 1997;498:531540.
15. Streeten DHP. Pathogenesis of hyperadrenergic orthostatic hypotension: evidence of disordered venous innervation exclusively in the lower limbs. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:15821588.
16. Jacob G, Biaggioni I. Idiopathic orthostatic intolerance and postural tachycardia syndromes. Am J Med Sci. 1999;317:88101.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. J. Lott, C. Hogeman, M. Herr, M. Bhagat, A. Kunselman, and L. I. Sinoway Vasoconstrictor responses in the upper and lower limbs to increases in transmural pressure J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 302 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. L. Calbet, J. Gonzalez-Alonso, J. W. Helge, H. Sondergaard, T. Munch-Andersen, R. Boushel, and B. Saltin Cardiac output and leg and arm blood flow during incremental exercise to exhaustion on the cycle ergometer J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 969 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Pellinger and J. R. Halliwill Effect of propranolol on sympathetically mediated leg vasoconstriction in humans J. Physiol., September 1, 2007; 583(2): 797 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Wray, A. J. Donato, S. K. Nishiyama, and R. S. Richardson Acute sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in cyclists and sedentary humans J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 704 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. L. Calbet, H.-C. Holmberg, H. Rosdahl, G. van Hall, M. Jensen-Urstad, and B. Saltin Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): R1448 - R1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kitano, J. K. Shoemaker, M. Ichinose, H. Wada, and T. Nishiyasu Comparison of cardiovascular responses between lower body negative pressure and head-up tilt J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2081 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Belin de Chantemele, L. Pascaud, M.-A. Custaud, A. Capri, F. Louisy, G. Ferretti, C. Gharib, and P. Arbeille Calf venous volume during stand-test after a 90-day bed-rest study with or without exercise countermeasure J. Physiol., December 1, 2004; 561(2): 611 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jacob, F. Costa, S. Vincent, D. Robertson, and I. Biaggioni Neurovascular Dissociation With Paradoxical Forearm Vasodilation During Systemic Tyramine Administration Circulation, May 20, 2003; 107(19): 2475 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D Monahan and C. A Ray Limb neurovascular control during altered otolithic input in humans J. Physiol., January 1, 2002; 538(1): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Imadojemu, M. E. J. Lott, K. Gleeson, C. S. Hogeman, C. A. Ray, and L. I. Sinoway Contribution of perfusion pressure to vascular resistance response during head-up tilt Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): H371 - H375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Pawelczyk, J. H. Zuckerman, C. G. Blomqvist, and B. D. Levine Regulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity after bed rest deconditioning Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): H2230 - H2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Pawelczyk and B. D. Levine Heterogeneous responses of human limbs to infused adrenergic agonists: a gravitational effect? J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2105 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |