Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2000;35:717-721

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Geel, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gilst, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Geel, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gilst, W. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrow Other Vascular biology

(Hypertension. 2000;35:717.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor A1166C Gene Polymorphism Is Associated With an Increased Response to Angiotensin II in Human Arteries

Peter Paul van Geel; Yigal M. Pinto; Adriaan A. Voors; Hendrik Buikema; Margreeth Oosterga; Harry J. G. M. Crijns; Wiek H. van Gilst

From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology (P.P. van G., Y.M.P., A.A.V., H.B., N.O., W. van G.) and Cardiology (P.P. van G., Y.M.P., A.A.V., M.O., H.J.G.M.C.), University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and Department of Cardiology (A.A.V.), St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr Peter Paul van Geel, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail P.P.Geel{at}MED.RUG.NL


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—An adenine/cytosine (A/C) base substitution at position 1166 in the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) gene is associated with the incidence of essential hypertension and increased coronary artery vasoconstriction. However, it is still unknown whether this polymorphism is associated with a difference in angiotensin II responsiveness. Therefore, we assessed whether the AT1R polymorphism is associated with different responses to angiotensin II in isolated human arteries. Furthermore, we evaluated whether inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system modifies the effect of the AT1R polymorphism. One hundred twelve patients who were undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were prospectively randomized to receive an ACE inhibitor or a placebo for 1 week before surgery. Excess segments of the internal mammary artery were exposed to angiotensin II (0.1 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L) and KCl (60 mmol/L) in organ bath experiments. Patients homozygous for the C allele (n=17) had significantly greater angiotensin II responses (percentage of this maximal KCl-induced response) than did patients genotyped with AA+AC (n=95, P<0.05). Although ACE inhibition increased the response to angiotensin II, the difference in the response to angiotensin II, between CC and AA+AC patients remained intact in ACE inhibitor–treated patients. These results indicate increased responses to angiotensin II in patients with the CC genotype. The mechanism is preserved during ACE inhibition, which in itself also increased the response to angiotensin II. This reveals that the A1166C polymorphism may be in linkage disequilibrium with a functional mutation that alters angiotensin II responsiveness, which may explain the described relation between this polymorphism and cardiovascular abnormalities.


Key Words: angiotensin II • receptors, angiotensin II • arteries • genetics • risk factors • polymorphism


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Increased levels of angiotensin II have been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease.1 Angiotensin II acts mainly via the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) as an acute vasoconstrictor that regulates systemic blood pressure and vascular tone. Furthermore, angiotensin II is involved in cardiac and vascular growth processes. Genetic variations in components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the enzymatic cascade that generates angiotensin II, have been associated with cardiovascular disease. An ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism is associated with myocardial infarction,2 left ventricular hypertrophy,3 and cardiomyopathy4 ; this seems to be related to the increased activity of this enzyme in plasma and cardiac tissue.5 6 Similarly, a genetic polymorphism (MT235) in the angiotensinogen gene has been related to cardiovascular diseases7 8 and to increased angiotensinogen levels.7 A polymorphism in the AT1R (an adenine/cytosine [A/C] base substitution at position 1166) has been associated with essential hypertension,9 increased artery vasoconstriction,10 11 and cardiac hypertrophy.12 However, this association is more difficult to interpret, because it is still unknown whether this variation in a noncoding region is associated with a difference in angiotensin II responsiveness.

Therefore, to evaluate whether the AT1R polymorphism is associated with a functional alteration, in a prospective study we assessed whether this polymorphism is associated with different responses to angiotensin II in isolated human arteries. Because it is known that ACE inhibition and a decrease in angiotensin II increase responsiveness to angiotensin II,13 we also assessed whether the effects of the C allele were modified by ACE inhibition.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients and Materials
Human isolated vessel material was obtained as excess material from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). During the operation, the arteries were dissected free in such a way that they remained in their original anatomic environment, and remaining segments were collected. Permission to use this excess graft tissue was granted by the Human Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Groningen (Groningen, the Netherlands). All patients (n=187) were scheduled to undergo elective CABG with an internal mammary artery (IMA) and were eligible to participate in the study. Patients were recruited between October 1994 and February 1997. The study was defined to include >=100 IMAs from 100 different patients that could be evaluated; this was based on an expected frequency of homozygosity for the C allele of >=8%, so analysis would be done on at least 8 subjects homozygous for the C allele. All patients who were scheduled to undergo elective CABG were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of ACE inhibition on angiotensin II responses in human vasculature. Patients were randomized to receive blinded oral treatment with quinapril (40 mg QD), captopril (50 mg BID), or placebo. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were able to take the study drug for >=7 days immediately before surgery. Patients were not included if they had used an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II antagonist in the past 2 years. Patients with a known intolerance to ACE inhibitors; a history of angioedema, symptomatic heart failure, aortic stenosis, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, left ventricular hypertrophy, severe renal impairment, functional renal artery stenoses, a renal transplant, primary aldosteronism, hypokalemia, severe hypertension, hypotension, atrial fibrillation, or obstructive pulmonary disease; or a clinically significant hematological or biochemical abnormality were not included. Treatment with diuretics, antiarrhythmics, digitalis, or tricyclic antidepressants was not allowed. The present study was a prospectively defined substudy.

Study Design
CABG was performed at the University Hospital Groningen and the St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein (the Netherlands). CABG was performed with a standardized anesthesia regimen for all patients at both centers. During surgery, segments of the IMA were harvested and transported immediately to the Department of Clinical Pharmacology at the University of Groningen, where measurements of in vitro vascular function took place within 3 hours after harvesting. The institutional review boards of both participating centers approved the protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Measurements of In Vitro Vascular Function
During CABG, segments of the left or right IMA were obtained as excess graft material from 139 patients. The segments were dissected free, cleansed from surrounding tissues, and cut into several rings (2 mm) with a sharp razor blade. The rings were mounted in 15-mL organ baths containing a buffer solution of the following composition (in mmol/L): NaCl 120.4, KCl 5.9, CaCl2 2.5, MgCl2 1.2, Na2PO4 1.2, glucose 11.5, and NaHCO3 25.0. The medium was continuously aerated with 95% O2/5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. The rings were connected to an isotonic displacement transducer, which gave a preload of 14 mN. The rings were allowed to equilibrate for 1 hour before they were primed and checked for viability through repeated stimulation (3 or 4 times) with 10 µmol/L phenylephrine and intermediate washing and stabilization periods.

For measurements of dose-response curves to increasing concentrations of angiotensin II, rings were preincubated with 100 µmol/L NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) for 30 minutes. Then, with the L-NMMA still present, rings were stimulated with increasing concentrations of angiotensin II (0.1 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L). After the final dose of angiotensin II, a response was evoked by stimulation with 60 mmol/L KCl in the presence of L-NMMA. Results are presented as a percentage of this maximal KCl-induced response (%KCl). The concentration agonist that induced 50% of the maximal response, expressed as the negative log mol/L (pEC50), was obtained graphically from individual concentration-response curves. To evaluate the effects of ACE inhibition on the response to angiotensin II in CC and AA+AC patients, pEC50 and the maximal response to 0.3 µmol/L angiotensin II (angiotensin IImax) were also determined separately in placebo- and ACE inhibitor–treated patients. Angiotensin II for functional measurements was obtained from Novartis Pharma BV. All other chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Measurements of in vitro vascular function were performed by the same analyst and were analyzed in a blinded fashion at the University of Groningen.

Genetic Analyses
Genomic DNA was extracted from white blood cells. The AT1R polymorphism was identified by a mismatch-polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism strategy.14 Digested products were separated with agarose gel electrophoresis.

Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted with a statistical analysis system package (SAS version 6.12; SAS Institute Inc). Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, {chi}2, or Wilcoxon test statistics were applied for baseline comparisons of patient characteristics. An ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare vascular function at different concentrations of angiotensin II. To determine differences between the AT1R genotypes, a 2-way ANOVA was used, with the main effects of AT1R polymorphism and treatment. In this way, the effect of the AT1R polymorphism was corrected for a possible treatment effect. All analyses were 2-tailed, and a value of P<=0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Excess graft material was obtained from 139 patients. No control responses could be evoked in 27 of these patients through repeated stimulation with phenylephrine (AA, n=16; AC, n=9; CC, n=2). Of the remaining 112 patients, 60 (54%) were genotyped as AA, 35 (31%) as AC, and 17 (15%) as CC. Baseline characteristics did not differ between CC- and AA+AC–genotyped patients, except for HDL cholesterol (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics According to AT1R Genotype

Vascular Responses to Angiotensin II
The angiotensin IImax response was significantly higher in CC patients (CC 304±48 µm, AA+AC 161±13 µm, P<0.001). The Figure shows the average of individual angiotensin II dose-response curves (in %KCl) for the CC versus the AA+AC group. Contraction, which was induced by increasing concentrations of angiotensin II, was significantly higher in the CC group (P<0.05). The pEC50 of the dose-response curve to angiotensin II did not differ between CC- and AA+AC–genotyped patients (pEC50: CC 7.86±0.12 -log mol/L, AA+AC 7.75±0.05 -log mol/L, P=0.41).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dose-response curves of increasing concentrations of angiotensin II (0.1 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L) in IMAs according to AT1R genotype. {circ}, AA+AC genotype (n=95). •, CC genotype (n=17). Values are mean±SEM. P value represents ANOVA for repeated measures.

Tables 2 and 3 show the angiotensin IImax response (in %KCl) and the pEC50 of the dose-response curve to angiotensin II, respectively, in CC and AA+AC patients for placebo- (ACEI-) and ACE inhibitor– (ACEI+) treated patients. Overall, there was a significantly higher angiotensin IImax response in CC than in AA+AC patients (P=0.045), whereas pEC50 did not differ (P=0.41). Moreover, ACE inhibition did not modify the effect of AT1R genotype on the angiotensin IImax response (interaction P=0.58) or pEC50 (interaction P=0.95).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Angiotensin IImax Response According to ACE Inhibition and AT1R Genotype


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. pEC50 According to ACE Inhibition and AT1R Genotype


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study is the first to demonstrate that the AT1R A1166C polymorphism is associated with an increased response to angiotensin II in isolated human arteries. The A1166C mutation is located in a nontranslated region of the gene, and it has been shown that the frequency of the C allele is increased in patients with hypertension.9 This suggests that the A1166C polymorphism may be in linkage disequilibrium with a functional mutation that alters angiotensin II responsiveness. In contrast to many other studies on genetic polymorphisms, our findings were obtained in a prospectively defined study in which vascular experiments were performed and evaluated before genotype or treatment status was known.

If these results are confirmed, the situation for subjects with the CC genotype resembles that of patients with the deletion polymorphism in the ACE gene or the MT235 polymorphism in the angiotensinogen gene: these polymorphisms are also associated with an increased activity of the RAS. Therefore, all polymorphisms in the RAS that are associated with cardiovascular disease seem to be associated with the activation of this system. This underlines the large body of evidence that suggests an adverse role for inappropriate activation of the RAS. Individual heterogeneity in activity of the RAS seems to modify the relative role of the RAS in cardiovascular disease.15 16

We also studied the effects of ACE inhibition on the response to angiotensin II. The findings make 2 points. First, ACE inhibition increased the responsiveness to angiotensin II. The effect of the C allele on angiotensin II responsiveness was comparable to that of the ACE inhibitor, providing an idea of the physiological magnitude of the effects of the C allele. A second point is that the effect of the AT1R C allele is independent of the effect of ACE inhibition. Chronic ACE inhibition increases vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II,13 possibly due to receptor upregulation.17 If the CC genotype causes a fixed increase in receptor numbers, we would expect the increased responsiveness in CC patients to be masked by the increase that is due to ACE inhibition. However, that is not what we observed. We saw essentially the same difference for CC and AA+AC patients, regardless of the use of an ACE inhibitor. This suggests that the A1166C polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with a mutation that dynamically increases the responsiveness to angiotensin II, on top of changes that are induced by exogenous stimuli. This is of interest because it provides the hypothesis that CC patients may still increase their response to angiotensin II, even under circumstances that by themselves cause increased angiotensin II responsiveness.

Recently, other studies have identified polymorphisms located in the coding or the 3' and 5' flanking region of the AT1R gene.9 18 19 Of these newly identified polymorphisms, only 573C was in complete linkage disequilibrium with 1166C.9 18 Although this single-base polymorphism is in the coding region of the gene, the mutation at this site does not alter the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. Furthermore, none of the newly identified polymorphisms (including the single-base change at nucleotide 573) are associated with hypertension,9 and therefore it is less likely to be responsible for the associations found with the 1166C allele. As suggested by Poirier et al,18 newly identified polymorphisms in the AT1R gene that might explain the associations found with the 1166C allele are particularly worthwhile to further characterize when 3 conditions are met: linkage disequilibrium with the AT1R A1166C polymorphism, a similar or stronger interaction with the disease, and location in a region that would suggest a functional role.

The increased response to angiotensin II in patients with the CC genotype is consistent with earlier studies10 11 that documented an exaggerated vasoconstrictor response to methylergonovine maleate and phenylephrine in patients with the AT1R CC genotype. The increased {alpha}-adrenergic–mediated response in CC patients might reflect a chronic increase in the potentiating effect of angiotensin II11 and might be of interest given the relationship found between this polymorphism and essential hypertension.9 However, as with the ACE polymorphism, others have found no association with hypertension20 21 22 and coronary artery disease.23 24 These conflicting data can be caused by differences in selection criteria of the sample, ethnic diversity, or the often retrospective or cross-sectional nature of the analyses. Because most of the polymorphic markers in the RAS confer a low absolute risk, it is very important to specify a possible stable phenotype that elucidates the relative role of a polymorphism in cardiovascular disease.

Although this study was not intended to assess the relative frequency of the C allele in our sample population, the frequency was higher than most of the values published. However, it should be noticed that all of our subjects had documented coronary artery disease, so if homozygosity for the C allele is associated with atherosclerosis, this group would be slightly overrepresented. Therefore, the high frequency of the C allele in our sample should not necessarily be considered representative of the population at large.

The increased response of arteries from subjects homozygous for the C allele of the AT1R gene provides a possible explanation for the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in such subjects.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grant 950-10-642 of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), the Netherlands. We thank the Trial Coordination Center (TCC) of Groningen for valuable assistance.

Received July 1, 1999; first decision July 30, 1999; accepted October 26, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure: a role for the novo angiotensin II generation. Circulation. 1997;96:4065–4082.[Free Full Text]

2. Cambien F, Poirier O, Lecerf L, Evans A, Cambou J-P, Arveiler D, Luc G, Bard J-M, Bara L, Ricard S, Tiret L, Amouyel P, Alhenc-Gelas F, Soubrier F. Deletion polymorphism in the gene for angiotensin-converting enzyme is a potent risk factor for myocardial infarction. Nature. 1992;359:641–644.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Schunkert H, Hense H-W, Holmer SR, Stender M, Perz S, Keil U, Lorell BH, Riegger GAJ. Association between a deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene and left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1634–1638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Pinto YM, van Gilst WH, Kingma JH, Schunkert H, for the CATS Investigators. The deletion-type allele of the angiotensin converting enzyme is associated with progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1622–1626.[Abstract]

5. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1343–1346.

6. Danser AHJ, Schalekamp MADH, Bax WA, van den Brink AM, Saxena PR, Riegger GAJ, Schunkert H. Angiotensin-converting enzyme in the human heart: effect of the deletion/insertion polymorphism. Circulation. 1995;92:1387–1388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel J-M, Corvol P. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992;71:169–180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Katsuya T, Koike G, Yee TW, Sharpe N, Jackson R, Norton R, Horiuchi M, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, MacMahon S. Association of angiotensinogen gene T235 variant with increased risk of coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1995;345:1600–1603.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Bonnardeaux A, Davies E, Jeunemaitre X, Féry I, Charru A, Clauser E, Tiret L, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism in human essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;24:63–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Amant C, Hamon M, Bauters C, Richard F, Helbecque N, McFadden EP, Escudero X, Lablanche J-M, Amouyel P, Bertrand ME. The angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with coronary artery vasoconstriction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:486–490.[Abstract]

11. Henrion D, Amant C, Benessiano J, Philip I, Plantefève G, Chatel D, Hwas U, Desmont JM, Durand G, Amouyel P, Lévy BI. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with an increased vascular reactivity in the human mammary artery in vitro. J Vasc Res. 1998;35:356–362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Osterop APRM, Kofflard MJM, Sandkuijl LA, ten Cate FJ, Krams R, Schalekamp MADH, Danser AHJ. AT1 receptor A/C1166 polymorphism contributes to cardiac hypertrophy in subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hypertension. 1998;32:825–830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Buikema H, Pinto YM, van Geel PP, Rooks G, de Langen CDJ, de Graeff PA, van Gilst WH. Differential inhibition of plasma versus tissue ACE by Utibapril: biochemical and functional evidence for inhibition of vascular ACE activity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997;29:684–691.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Hingorani AD, Brown MJ. A simple molecular assay for the C1166 variant of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;213:725–729.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. O’Malley JP, Maslen CL, Illingworth DR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype and cardiovascular disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1998;97:1780–1783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Ueda S, Elliott HL, Morton JJ, Connell JMC. Enhanced pressor response to angiotensin I in normotensive men with the deletion genotype (DD) for angiotensin-converting enzyme. Hypertension. 1995;25:1266–1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Gunther S, Gimbrone MA Jr, Alexander RW. Regulation by angiotensin II of its receptors in resistance blood vessels. Nature. 1980;287:230–232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Poirier O, Georges J-L, Ricard S, Arveiler D, Ruidavets J-B, Luc G, Evans A, Cambien F, Tiret L. New polymorphisms of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene and their associations with myocardial infarction and blood pressure: the ECTIM study. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1443–1447.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Morgan L, Crawshaw S, Baker PN, Edwards R, Broughton Pipkin F, Kalsheker N. Functional and genetic studies of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1389–1396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Schmidt S, Beige J, Walla-Friedel M, Michel MC, Sharma AM, Ritz E. A polymorphism in the gene for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor is not associated with hypertension. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1385–1388.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Takami S, Katsuya T, Rakugi H, Sato N, Nakata Y, Kamitani A, Miki T, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with increase of left ventricular mass but not with hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:316–321.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Liyou N, Davis D, James K, Simons L, Friedlander Y, Simons J, McCallum J, Johnson A. The A1166C mutation in the angiotensin II type 1 receptor and hypertension in the elderly. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999;26:525–526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Gardemann A, Hguyen QD, Humme J, Stricker J, Katz N, Tillmans H, Herhlein FW, Rau M, Haberbosch W. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C gene polymorphism: absence of an association with the risk of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction and of a synergistic effect with angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism on the risk of these diseases. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1657–1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Jeunemaitre X, Ledru F, Battaglia S, Guillanneuf MT, Courbon D, Dumont C, Darmon O, Guize L, Guermonprez JL, Diebold B, Ducimetiere P. Genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system and angiographic extent and severity of coronary artery disease: the CORGENE study. Hum Genet. 1997;99:66–73. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
O. Bozkurt, A. de Boer, D. E Grobbee, A. A Kroon, P. Schiffers, P. de Leeuw, and O. H Klungel
Renin-angiotensin system polymorphisms and the association between use of angiotensin II receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and the risk of diabetes
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2009; 10(2): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Taranta, A. Gianviti, A. Palma, V. De Luca, L. Mannucci, M. A. Procaccino, G. M. Ghiggeri, G. Caridi, D. Fruci, S. Ferracuti, et al.
Genetic risk factors in typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1851 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
B. Volkan-Salanci, S. Dagdelen, M. Alikasifoglu, T. Erbas, M. Hayran, and B. Erbas
Impact of renin-angiotensin system polymorphisms on renal haemodynamic responsiveness to acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2009; 10(1): 41 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Nieves-Cintron, G. C. Amberg, M. F. Navedo, J. D. Molkentin, and L. F. Santana
The control of Ca2+ influx and NFATc3 signaling in arterial smooth muscle during hypertension
PNAS, October 7, 2008; 105(40): 15623 - 15628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. de Denus, M. Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M.-P. Dube, F. Belanger, S. Lepage, M.-H. Leblanc, D. Gossard, A. Ducharme, N. Racine, L. Whittom, et al.
Effects of AGTR1 A1166C Gene Polymorphism in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Candesartan
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2008; 42(7): 925 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
G. T. Jones, A. R. Thompson, F. M. van Bockxmeer, H. Hafez, J. A. Cooper, J. Golledge, S. E. Humphries, P. E. Norman, and A. M. van Rij
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor 1166C Polymorphism Is Associated With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Three Independent Cohorts
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(4): 764 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. F. Navedo, M. Nieves-Cintron, G. C. Amberg, C. Yuan, V. S. Votaw, W. J. Lederer, G. S. McKnight, and L. F. Santana
AKAP150 Is Required for Stuttering Persistent Ca2+ Sparklets and Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension
Circ. Res., February 1, 2008; 102(2): e1 - e11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. M. Martin, J. A. Buckenberger, J. Jiang, G. E. Malana, G. J. Nuovo, M. Chotani, D. S. Feldman, T. D. Schmittgen, and T. S. Elton
The Human Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor +1166 A/C Polymorphism Attenuates MicroRNA-155 Binding
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24262 - 24269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. K. Mehta and K. K. Griendling
Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C82 - C97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Nishikino, T. Matsunaga, K. Yasuda, T. Adachi, T. Moritani, G. Tsujimoto, K. Tsuda, and N. Aoki
Genetic Variation in the Renin-Angiotensin System and Autonomic Nervous System Function in Young Healthy Japanese Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4676 - 4681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. A. Cameron, T. J. Mocatta, A. P. Pilbrow, C. M. Frampton, R. W. Troughton, A. M. Richards, and C. C. Winterbourn
Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor A1166C Gene Polymorphism Correlates With Oxidative Stress Levels in Human Heart Failure
Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1155 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. C.-c. Hsu, M. S. Bray, W.H.L. Kao, J. S. Pankow, E. Boerwinkle, and J. Coresh
Genetic Variation of the Renin-Angiotensin System and Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Black Individuals in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 504 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M R Abdollahi, T R Gaunt, H E Syddall, C Cooper, D I W Phillips, S Ye, and I N M Day
Angiotensin II type I receptor gene polymorphism: anthropometric and metabolic syndrome traits
J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2005; 42(5): 396 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. C. Amberg and L. F. Santana
Downregulation of the BK Channel {beta}1 Subunit in Genetic Hypertension
Circ. Res., November 14, 2003; 93(10): 965 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Jones, S. S. Dhamrait, J. R. Payne, E. Hawe, P. Li, I. S. Toor, L. Luong, P. T.E. Wootton, G. J. Miller, S. E. Humphries, et al.
Genetic Variants of Angiotensin II Receptors and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 500 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
C. Wong, N. R. Mahapatra, S. Chitbangonsyn, P. Mahboubi, M. Mahata, S. K. Mahata, and D. T. O'Connor
The angiotensin II receptor (Agtr1a): functional regulatory polymorphisms in a locus genetically linked to blood pressure variation in the mouse
Physiol Genomics, June 24, 2003; 14(1): 83 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
J.-J. Mourad, G. Ducailar, A. Rudnicki, M. Lajemi, A. Mimran, and M. E Safar
Age-related increase of pulse pressure and gene polymorphisms in essential hypertension: a preliminary study
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2002; 3(2): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P P van Geel, Y M Pinto, A H Zwinderman, R H Henning, A J van Boven, J W Jukema, A V G Bruschke, J J P Kastelein, W H van Gilst, and G F BAXTER
Increased risk for ischaemic events is related to combined RAS polymorphism
Heart, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 458 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin
Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. S. Wierzbicki, M. Lambert-Hammill, P. J. Lumb, and M. A. Crook
Renin-Angiotensin System Polymorphisms and Coronary Events in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Hypertension, November 1, 2000; 36(5): 808 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Geel, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gilst, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Geel, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by van Gilst, W. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrow Other Vascular biology