(Hypertension. 2000;35:775.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Section of Human Anatomy, Departments of Pharmacological Sciences and Experimental Medicine (M.S., F.A.) and Comparative Morphology and Biochemical Sciences (L.V.), University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy; and Pharmaceutical Research and Development (A.L., R.T.), Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica SpA, Milan, Italy.
Correspondence to Francesco Amenta, MD, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Medicina Sperimentale, via M Scalzino 3, 62032 Camerino, Italy. E-mail amenta{at}cambio.unicam.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: calcium antagonists arterioles rats, SHR
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was designed to assess in SHR the influence of different dihydropyridine-type CAs on the morphology of renal glomerulus and of afferent and efferent arterioles. The second-generation dihydropyridine-type CA nicardipine, the novel CA manidipine, and the recently developed vasoselective dihydropyridine-type derivative lercanidipine were studied.12 The nondihydropyridine-type vasodilator hydralazine was used as a reference compound.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue Preparation
After 12 weeks of treatment, at the age of 26 weeks,
systolic blood pressure was measured in the animals, which were
then weighed, anesthetized with diethyl ether, and perfused
through the left ventricle with a 0.9% NaCl solution containing 0.5%
polyvinylpyrrolidone, 20 IU heparin, and 25 mg/mL EDTA to produce
maximal arteriolar dilatation. This solution was maintained at 37°C,
and perfusion lasted for 10 to 15 minutes. The first solution was then
replaced by a second solution of 10% formalin in 0.1 mol/L phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) at 25°C. Perfusion pressure was adjusted at a
constant rate of 1 mL · min- · 100 g body
wt-1 with the use of a catheter connected to a
pressure transducer inserted in the abdominal aorta. After 30 minutes
of perfusion, the kidneys were removed, weighed, fixed in the same
perfusion fixative for 1 week, and then processed for paraffin
embedding. Alternate consecutive parasagittal sections (6 µm
thick, 50 µm apart) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or
Massons trichrome stain to allow investigation of the morphology of
the glomerulus and vascular components. After staining, sections were
viewed under a light microscope connected with an image
analyzer.
For glomerular morphometry, 6 consecutive sections stained with Massons trichrome stain were viewed under a microscope connected via a TV camera to an IAS 2000 image analyzer (Delta Sistemi). Ten renal corpuscles were identified per slide; this allowed analysis of 60 glomeruli per rat. With the use of an overlap option, glomeruli (including glomerular capillaries and mesangium) and renal corpuscles (glomerulus plus glomerular capsule) were delineated. The area occupied by glomeruli (rG) and renal corpuscles (rC) was calculated with use of a program of the image analyzer. The rG-to-rC ratio was then determined. An increase in this value indicates the occurrence of glomerular hypertrophy. Mesangial nuclei were also counted in a 10x103 µm2 area of the same glomeruli selected for morphometric analysis.
Vascular Morphometry
Glomerular afferent and efferent arterioles were
measured on 10 consecutive sections per rat according to the described
image analysis system. On each section, 12 afferent and
efferent arterioles were examined. This sampling protocol included
examination of the vascular pole of 120 glomeruli per animal. Sections
were viewed at a final magnification of x400. The luminal and wall
areas were then independently measured for afferent and efferent
glomerular arterioles. Further details on morphometric
analysis are reported elsewhere.13
Data Analysis
Mean values of the different parameters that were
investigated were calculated from single animal data. Group
mean±SEM values were derived from single animal data. The
significance of differences between mean values was analyzed
with the use of ANOVA, followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple range
test. For rG-to-rC and wall-to-lumen ratios, normal distributions of
theoretic frequencies and frequencies observed in single measurements
were assessed through the use of
2
analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In control SHR, an increase in urine volume was noticeable. This effect was countered with lercanidipine, hydralazine, and manidipine but not nicardipine (data not shown). Urinary albumin concentrations were increased in control SHR (278±12 mg/d) in comparison with normotensive WKY rats (80±4 mg/d, P<0.01 versus SHR). This phenomenon was countered by treatment with lercanidipine (200±7 mg/d, P<0.01 versus control SHR), manidipine (190±9 mg/d, P<0.01 versus control SHR), and nicardipine (230±13 mg/d, P<0.01 versus control SHR) but not hydralazine (273±10 mg/d). In control SHR, urinary Na+ and K+ concentrations were decreased in comparison with normotensive WKY rats (data not shown). Lercanidipine, manidipine, nicardipine, and hydralazine countered Na+ retention of SHR (data not shown). Treatment with manidipine and nicardipine enhanced urinary K+ decrease compared with lercanidipine and hydralazine and increased the Na+-to-K+ ratio (data not shown).
Glomerular Morphology
Analysis of the morphology of renal glomeruli in control
SHR revealed the occurrence of hypertrophy and sclerosis of
glomerular capillaries and an increase in
mesangial cells compared with age-matched normotensive WKY
rats (Figure 2). Decreased space between
glomerular capsule and glomeruli (capsular lumen) was also
noticeable in SHR as a consequence of glomerular
hypertrophy (Figure 2). The ratio of the area
occupied by renal glomeruli and capsule (rG-to-rC ratio) was also
increased in SHR (Table 1). The
studied drugs countered these phenomena (Table 1), with
lercanidipine and manidipine being the most effective in reversal of
the rG-to-rC ratio (Table 1). Moreover, pharmacological
treatment with CAs normalized the number of nuclei of
mesangial cells (Table 1 and Figure 2).
|
|
Afferent and Efferent Glomerular Arterioles
Data on the influence of hypertension and of pharmacological
treatment on the morphology of afferent and efferent
glomerular arterioles are summarized in Table 2. A significant vasoconstriction
(decreased luminal area) was observed in afferent and efferent
arterioles of SHR compared with those of WKY rats (Figure 2A).
In control SHR, afferent arterioles showed luminal narrowing, whereas
luminal narrowing accompanied by an increase in wall thickness was
observed in efferent arterioles (Table 2 and Figure 2B).
This phenomenon was not accompanied by changes in the number of nuclei
of smooth muscle cells (data not shown). Among the compounds that were
investigated, only lercanidipine and manidipine countered
hypertension-dependent changes in both afferent and efferent
glomerular arterioles (Figures 2C and 2D and Table 2). Treatment with nicardipine dilated the
afferent, but not the efferent, arterioles (Figure 2E and Table 2). Hydralazine had no effect on afferent or efferent
arterioles (Figure 2F and Table 2). The antihypertensive
drugs that were tested did not counter the increased wall thickness of
efferent arterioles expressed as wall area (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glomerular pressure normalization and the subsequent increase in glomerular filtration rate that is impaired in hypertension may represent important properties of antihypertensive drugs.18 First- and second-generation CAs were able to vasodilate afferent arterioles but not efferent arterioles.19 This does not normalize glomerular pressure and could contribute to the occurrence of time-dependent glomerular damage.20 In the present study, we analyzed the influence of hypertension on the morphology of glomerular arterioles and the effect of pharmacological treatment on these changes. Treatment included 3 dihydropyridine-type CAs (lercanidipine, manidipine, and nicardipine) and the nondihydropyridine-type vasodilator hydralazine. Manidipine was chosen in view of its favorable renal profile, which includes vasodilatation of afferent and efferent arterioles, as demonstrated in functional studies.11 Nicardipine, which to some extent counters hypertension-related renal microanatomic changes,13 was used as a reference CA. Lercanidipine is a newly developed long-lasting and vasoselective CA12 that displays the same vasodilatory potency as manidipine on the renal vascular tree.21
Our morphometric analysis demonstrated luminal narrowing of both afferent and efferent arterioles in SHR and an increased wall thickness of only efferent arterioles. This latter change probably is the result of hypertrophy of efferent arteriole smooth muscle, as documented by no change in the number of smooth muscle nuclei for SHR and normotensive WKY rats. The occurrence of afferent arteriole vasoconstriction parallel to the increase in blood pressure was documented in both SHR and deoxycorticosterone-salt hypertensive rats.22 23 Our data that show in SHR a decreased afferent arteriole luminal area that is not accompanied by increased thickness of the arteriolar wall suggest the occurrence of remodeling in afferent arterioles. Remodeling is a phenomenon that is characterized by a reduction in the external arterial diameter and luminal encroachment independent of hypertrophy of the arterial wall.24 25 In this situation, the arterial smooth muscle may become shorter and unable to extend to its original length during relaxation, resulting in the impairment of maximal dilatation capability.25 This phenomenon, which affects the afferent arterioles of SHR, is sensitive to pharmacological treatment with CAs. Both lercanidipine and manidipine induced vasodilatation of both afferent and efferent arterioles in SHR. Functional studies have shown that the treatment of SHR with manidipine reduced afferent and efferent arteriolar resistance.11 This decreased resistance probably is the result of vasodilatation of the 2 arterioles documented in the present study. The observation that both lercanidipine and manidipine caused a similar degree of vasodilatation to afferent and efferent arterioles suggests that the compounds may improve glomerular capillary pressure. In the present work, the vasodilatory activity of lercanidipine on glomerular efferent arteriole was documented for the first time. This suggests that the compound may represent a beneficial antihypertensive agent for patients affected by renal disorders. In addition to the vascular effect, treatment with lercanidipine and manidipine countered glomerular injury occurring in SHR.3 23 These findings, together with the observation of decreased albuminuria in manidipine- or lercanidipine-treated SHR, suggest that the glomerular effects of these drugs may have functional relevance.
Received July 30, 1999; first decision August 18, 1999; accepted October 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Saito N, Mukaino S. Renal tissue lesions in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Heart J. 1979;20:694698.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Feld LG, Van Liew JB, Galaske RG, Boylan JW. Selectivity of renal injury and proteinuria in spontaneously hypertensive rat. Kidney Int. 1977;12:332343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Dworkin LD, Feiner HD. Glomerular injury in uninephrectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats: a consequence of glomerular capillary hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:797809.
5. Martinez-Maldonado M, Rodriguez-Sargent C, Cangiano JL, Dworkin LD. Pathogenesis of systemic hypertension and glomerular injury in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:471521.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Dworkin LD, Tolbert E, Recht PA, Hersch JC, Feiner H,
Levin R. Effects of amlodipine on glomerular filtration,
growth, and injury in experimental hypertension.
Hypertension. 1996;27:245250.
7. Hayashi K, Nagahama T, Oka K, Epstain M, Saruta T. Disparate effects of calcium antagonists on renal microcirculation. Hypertens Res. 1996;19:3136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ozawa Y, Hayashi K, Nagahama T, Fujiwara K, Wakino S, Saruta T. Renal afferent and efferent arteriolar dilatation by nivaldipine: studies in the isolated perfused hydronephrotic kidney. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;33:243247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Nayler WJ. Calcium Antagonists. Sidney/London/New York: Academic Press; 1985.
10.
Fleming JT, Parekh N, Steinhausen M. Calcium
antagonists preferentially dilate preglomerular
vessels of hydronephrotic kidney. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:F1157F1163.
11. Tojo A, Kimura K, Matsuoka H, Sugimoto T. Effects of manidipine hydrochloride on the renal microcirculation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20:895899.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Testa R, Leonardi A, Tajana A, Riscassi E, Magliocca R, Sartani A. Lercanidipine (REC 15/2375): a novel 1,4 dihydropyridine calcium antagonist for hypertension. Cardiovasc Drugs Res. 1997;15:187219.
13. Ferrante F, Abbate F, Ciriaco E, Polidori C, Amenta F. Protective effect of nicardipine treatment on renal microanatomical changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1994;16:415429.
14. Allison MEM, Lipham EM, Gottschalk CW. Hydrostatic pressure in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1972;223:975983.
15. Hostetter TH, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. The calcium antagonists for intrarenal hypertension in the initiation and progression of diabetic and other glomerulopathies. Am J Physiol. 1982;72:375380.
16. Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Therapeutic advantage of converting enzyme inhibitors in arresting progressive renal disease associated with systemic hypertension in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:19932000.
17.
Wenzel UO, Helmchen U, Schoeppe W, Schwietzer G.
Combination treatment of enalapril with nitrendipine in rats with
renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;23:114122.
18.
Lazarus J, Hampers CL, Merill JP. Hypertension in
chronic renal failure: treatment with hemodialysis and nephrectomy.
Arch Intern Med. 1974;133:10591066.
19. Loutzenhiser R, Hayashi K, Epstain M. CA augment glomerular filtration rate of angiotensin II-vasoconstricted isolated perfused rat kidneys by dilating afferent but not efferent arterioles. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12(suppl 6):s-149s-154.
20. Dworkin LD, Benstein JA, Parker M, Tolbert E, Feiner HD. Calcium antagonists and converting enzyme inhibitors reduce renal injury by different mechanisms. Kidney Int. 1993;43:808814.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sironi G, Colombo D, Greto L, Leonardi A, Testa R. Regional vasodilating effect of lercanidipine in dogs. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:A193.
22. Tojo A, Kimura K, Nanba S, Matsuoka K. Variations of renal arteriolar diameter in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats: a microvascular study. Virchows Arch [A] Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1990;417:389393.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Kimura K, Tojo A, Matsuoka H, Sugimoto T. Renal
arteriolar diameters in spontaneously hypertensive rats: vascular cast
study. Hypertension. 1991;18:101110.
24.
Heagerty AM, Aalkjaer C, Bound SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvany
MJ. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual process of remodeling
and growth. Hypertension. 1993;21:391397.
25.
Baumbach GL, Heistad DD. Remodeling of cerebral
arterioles in chronic hypertension. Hypertension. 1989;13:968972.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-G. Sun, Y.-X. Cao, W.-W. Wang, S.-F. Ma, T. Yao, and Y.-C. Zhu Hydrogen sulphide is an inhibitor of L-type calcium channels and mechanical contraction in rat cardiomyocytes Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2008; 79(4): 632 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rosenthal, E. Rosenmann, D. Tomassoni, and F. Amenta Effect of Lercanidipine on Kidney Microanatomy in Cohen-Rosenthal Diabetic Hypertensive Rats Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2007; 12(2): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sabbatini, L. Vitaioli, E. Baldoni, and F. Amenta Nephroprotective Effect of Treatment with Calcium Channel Blockers in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2000; 294(3): 948 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |