(Hypertension. 2000;35:864.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Division of Atherosclerosis, Metabolism and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Masaaki Suzuki, MD, Division of Atherosclerosis, Metabolism and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1, Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan. E-mail masuzuki{at}hsp.ncvc.go.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: blood pressure sodium, dietary insulin resistance hypertension, essential risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of the present study was to clarify the relationship between nocturnal fall in BP and insulin resistance in hypertensive subjects. We also wanted to test the hypothesis that in patients with essential hypertension, insulin resistance, salt sensitivity, and failed nocturnal fall in BP are associated with each other.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 weeks before hospitalization. The
study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National
Cardiovascular Center, and all subjects gave
informed consent.
|
Study Protocol
After hospitalization, the subjects were administered a regular
diet containing 140 mmol/d NaCl daily for 1 to 2 weeks to allow BP
stabilization. The subjects were maintained on a low-salt diet (50
mmol/d) and a high-salt diet (255 mmol/d) for 1 week each, in
random order. A nurse checked the remaining food to confirm complete
food intake. Compliance to the prescribed diet was assessed with
measurements of 24-hour urinary Na+ excretion
during the last 3 days of each diet. On the fifth day of both the low-
and the high-salt period, the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test
(OGTT) was carried out. On the sixth day of each period, BP was
measured every hour for 24 hours with an automatic oscillometric device
(model BP-203i; Nippon Colin). Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
was calculated as diastolic BP plus one third of pulse BP,
and the average of the 24 daily MAPs was calculated (24-hour MAP).
Insulin sensitivity test was performed on the seventh day of each
period.
Assessment of Salt-Induced Increase in BP and Nocturnal Fall
in BP
To perform correlations between BP sensitivity to salt and other
variables, we defined a salt-induced increase in MAP as the change
in 24-hour MAP between the low and the high dietary salt intakes. A
nocturnal decline in BP was defined as a nocturnal fall in MAP. The
daytime MAP was obtained as the average of the 17 MAPs measured between
6 AM and 10 PM, and nighttime MAP was the
average of the remaining 7 MAPs. The nocturnal fall in MAP was defined
as the difference between daytime and nighttime MAPs.
Insulin Sensitivity Test
Glucose utilization in response to insulin was evaluated with a
newly modified steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG)
method16 17 18 with octreotide acetate (Sandostatin;
Novartis) after an overnight fasting period of
12 hours. Sandostatin
(9.8-pmol bolus followed by a constant infusion of 73.5 pmol/h) and
Novolin R insulin (45-pmol/kg bolus [7.5 mU/kg] followed by a
constant infusion at a rate of 4.62 pmol ·
kg-1 · min-1
[0.77 mU · kg-1 ·
min-1]; Novo Nordisk S/A) were infused
intravenously for 120 minutes. Glucose in a final 12%
solution containing KCl (0.5 µmol ·
kg-1 · min-1) was
infused at a rate of 0.033 mmol ·
kg-1 · min-1 (6
mg · kg-1 ·
min-1) through an antecubital vein via a
constant infusion pump. Blood samples were drawn routinely at 0, 30,
and 120 minutes (9:00, 9:30, and 11:00 AM) for the
determination of glucose, insulin, and lipids. The value of glucose at
120 minutes (SSPG) was used as a marker of insulin sensitivity to
glucose utilization. High SSPG levels indicate peripheral
insulin resistance. SSPG provides a good estimate of glucose clearance,
one that is very similar to those obtained with the glucose clamp
method as shown in control subjects.19 Furthermore,
Greenfield et al20 demonstrated in 30 subjects that SSPG
and M values (glucose utilization) determined with the glucose
clamp method are highly correlated (r=-0.93,
P<0.001). Theoretically, (infusion rate of glucose/SSPG) is
the formula to calculate glucose clearance. With the glucose
clamp method, the numerator is obtained as the fixed fasting blood
glucose, whereas with the SSPG method, SSPG (denominator) is obtained
as the fixed dose of the numerator (glucose infusion).
OGTT Determinations
A 75-g OGTT was carried out on all subjects after an overnight
fast, and plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were determined at
0, 30, 60, and 120 minutes. The areas under the curve of plasma glucose
and insulin (AUCs of glucose and insulin) for 120 minutes were
calculated.
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Two-tailed probability values
of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Students paired
t test was used to compare the data from low- and high-salt
periods or daytime and nighttime MAPs. Pearsons correlation
coefficients were calculated to examine the univariate
contributions of insulin sensitivity to salt sensitivity and to
nocturnal fall in MAP. Partial correlation was performed to assess the
independent contribution of insulin sensitivity to these 2
parameters.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The result for each parameter during a low- or high-salt period is shown in Table 2. Mean body weight was on average 0.4 kg higher during a high-salt than a low-salt period (P<0.05). Nocturnal MAP fall in the low-salt period tended to be higher compared with that in the high-salt period, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. No difference was observed between high- and low-salt study periods for SSPG, steady-state plasma insulin, or AUC of glucose or insulin during OGTT. Mean 24-hour urinary sodium excretion was significantly higher in the high-salt period than in the low-salt period (P<0.0001). Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were significantly higher during low-salt than during high-salt intake at both 0 and 120 minutes during the insulin sensitivity test (P<0.01).
|
The salt-induced increase in MAP was significantly correlated with SSPG (r=0.60, P<0.01) during the high-salt period (Figure 1). SSPG during the low-salt period did not correlate with the salt-induced increase in MAP. There was a significant negative correlation (r=-0.61, P<0.01) between nocturnal MAP fall and SSPG during the high-salt period (Figure 2). SSPG had no relationship with nocturnal MAP fall during the low-salt period.
|
|
Partial correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the independent association of insulin sensitivity with salt-induced increase in MAP and with nocturnal fall in MAP. Significant partial correlation (r=0.63, P<0.01) was observed between SSPG during the high-salt period and salt-induced increase in MAP, eliminating the effects of age, BMI, and 24-hour MAP during the high-salt period. Partial correlation analysis was also performed between nocturnal MAP fall and SSPG during the high-salt period, and significant negative correlation was noted (r=-0.75, P<0.01), eliminating the effects of age, BMI, and 24-hour MAP during the high-salt period. No significant partial correlation was observed between SSPG during the low-salt period and salt-induced increase in MAP or nocturnal MAP fall during the low-salt period.
Regarding insulin response during OGTT, no simple or partial correlations were observed between the salt-induced increase in MAP and AUC of insulin during low- and high-salt intake periods. There were no simple and partial correlations between nocturnal MAP fall and AUC of insulin during the low- and high-salt periods. No simple and partial correlations were noted between AUC of glucose and salt-induced increase in MAP or nocturnal MAP fall during the low- and high-salt periods.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven of 20 subjects were classified as salt sensitive on the basis of
a salt-induced increase in MAP of
3 mm Hg. An additional 9
subjects were classified as salt resistant. The SSPG levels
(13.1±1.4 mmol/L) of salt-sensitive subjects were significantly
(P<0.05) higher than the SSPG levels (9.5±1.5 mmol/L)
of salt-resistant subjects. Therefore, salt sensitivity was
closely associated with insulin resistance.
The SSPG levels (12.1±0.9 mmol/L) of the subjects whose nocturnal
MAP fall was <10% (n=17) tended to be higher (P=0.06) than
the SSPG levels (7.9±0.2 mmol/L) of the subjects whose nocturnal
MAP fall was
10% (n=3).
In the present study, salt-induced increase in MAP was significantly and inversely correlated with nocturnal MAP fall (r=-0.52, P<0.02) during high salt intake (simple correlation). Significant partial correlation was also observed between salt-induced increase in MAP and nocturnal MAP fall (r=-0.59, P<0.01) in the high-salt period after correction for the effects of age, BMI, and 24-hour MAP in the high-salt period. There was no significant correlation between salt-induced increase in MAP and nocturnal MAP fall during the low-salt period. Therefore, insulin resistance, salt sensitivity (salt-induced increase in BP), and failed nocturnal decline in BP were associated with each other in hypertensive subjects.
The association between insulin resistance and salt sensitivity was demonstrated in hypertensive subjects in several studies.3 4 5 This association was also found in young normotensive subjects.21 22 However, there was only 1 report that indicated a relationship between insulin sensitivity and nocturnal BP fall. Chen et al23 reported that insulin resistance and ß-cell dysfunction were both noted in nondippers. They measured plasma glucose and insulin levels during OGTT; plasma insulin levels were higher in dipper hypertensive patients than in nondippers. These results did not prove there is insulin resistance in the nondipper group; the study just showed that the ratio of fasting insulin to glucose was higher in nondippers. Insulin resistance should be evaluated with a more precise method. There has been no study that demonstrated the relationship among insulin sensitivity, salt sensitivity, and nocturnal BP fall in subjects with essential hypertension.
The exact mechanism for the association between insulin resistance and salt sensitivity is unclear. It is possible that increased intracellular Ca2+ plays an important role in essential hypertension. Increased intracellular Ca2+ during sodium loading was described in salt-sensitive subjects with hypertension.24 25 It was reported that the reduced insulin action (insulin resistance) was associated with high intracellular Ca2+ due to the decreased Ca2+-ATPase and Na+,K+-ATPase,26 which are insulin sensitive.27 28 Intracellular Ca2+ metabolism might contribute to a disturbed circadian rhythm of BP.
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels at 0 and 120 minutes during insulin sensitivity test did not correlate with SSPG or MAP for low- and high-salt diets. Changes in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels at 0 and 120 minutes in response to salt loading did not correlate with salt-induced changes in SSPG or MAP. Although plasma catecholamines were higher during the low-salt than during the high-salt intake, no difference in SSPG levels was observed between low- and high-salt periods. Thus, altered activity in sympathetic nervous system does not seem to directly relate to insulin resistance or BP. However, insulin sensitivity may be influenced by an increased activity of sympathetic nervous system; Laakso et al29 reported that epinephrine affects insulin sensitivity.
In the present study, no relation was observed between insulin resistance and salt sensitivity or nocturnal MAP fall during the low-salt period; during the low-salt period, increased activity of sympathetic nervous system, as demonstrated with the higher level of plasma catecholamines, affected insulin sensitivity, and the relations shown in the high-salt period disappeared.
Gaboury et al30 demonstrated that dietary salt restriction had no effect on insulin sensitivity as measured with the euglycemic glucose clamp method in hypertensive subjects. Using the same method, Gomi et al31 showed that strict dietary salt reduction worsened insulin sensitivity by increasing sympathetic nervous activity in hypertension. In the present study, SSPG and AUC of insulin tended to be higher during the low-salt period than during the high-salt period (Table 2). The BMIs of the subjects in the present study and the study of Gaboury et al30 were higher than those in the study of Gomi et al.31 Insulin resistance based on the higher BMI might weaken the effect of increasing sympathetic nervous activity on insulin sensitivity.
There were no significant simple and partial correlations between salt sensitivity and AUC of insulin during the low- and high-salt periods. Salt sensitivity tended to correlate with AUC of insulin for a high-salt diet (partial correlation coefficient=0.35, P>0.1; eliminating the effects of age, BMI, and 24-hour MAP). These results suggest that insulin resistance rather than hyperinsulinemia is more closely associated with salt sensitivity. We have reported a similar tendency between insulin resistance and hypertension, indicating that insulin resistance rather than hyperinsulinemia was more closely associated with high BP.32
In the present study, our data demonstrated that insulin resistance, salt sensitivity (salt-induced increase in BP), and decreased nocturnal BP fall were associated with each other. Insulin resistance,9 10 11 12 salt sensitivity,5 and reduced nocturnal BP decline13 14 were all described as risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, increased salt sensitivity and nondipper circadian BP pattern were considered additional factors of the multiple risk factor syndrome based on insulin resistance, such as syndrome X.33 It is important to improve insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients who exhibit salt sensitivity and reduced nocturnal BP decline to prevent cardiovascular diseases. In addition, the restriction of dietary salt intake might shift the circadian rhythm of BP from a nondipper to a dipper pattern,6 7 resulting in amelioration of the risks.
Received June 15, 1999; first decision July 14, 1999; accepted November 26, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Shen DC, Shieh SM, Fuh MM, Wu DA, Chen YD, Reaven GM.
Resistance to insulin-stimulated-glucose uptake in patients with
hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;66:580583.
3. Zavaroni I, Coruzzi P, Bonini L, Mossini GL, Musiari L, Gasparini P, Fantuzzi M, Reaven GM. Association between salt sensitivity and insulin concentrations in patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:855858.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Galletti F, Strazzullo P, Ferrara I, Annuzzi G, Rivellese AA, Gatto S, Mancini M. NaCl sensitivity of essential hypertensive patients is related to insulin resistance. J Hypertens. 1997;15:14851491.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Baldari G, Campese VM. Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in salt-sensitive patients with essential hypertension: role of insulin. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:2432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Uzu T, Kazembe FS, Ishikawa K, Nakamura S, Inenaga T,
Kimura G. High sodium sensitivity implicates nocturnal hypertension in
essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1996;28:139142.
7.
Higashi Y, Oshima T, Ozono R, Nakano Y, Matsuura H,
Kambe M, Kajiyama G. Nocturnal decline in blood pressure is attenuated
by NaCl loading in salt-sensitive patients with essential hypertension:
noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Hypertension. 1997;30:163167.
8. Goode GK, Miller JP, Heagerty AM. Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, and coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1995;345:362364.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Zavaroni I, Bonora E, Pagliara M, DallAglio E, Luchetti L, Buonanno G, Bonati PA, Bergonzani M, Gnudi L, Passeri M, Reaven G. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in healthy persons with hyperinsulinemia and normal glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:702706.[Abstract]
10.
Despres JP, Lamarche B, Mauriege P, Cantin B, Dagenais
GR, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ. Hyperinsulinemia as
an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease.
N Engl J Med. 1996;334:952957.
11. Shinozaki K, Suzuki M, Ikebuchi M, Hara Y, Harano Y. Demonstration of insulin resistance in coronary heart disease documented with angiography. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:17.[Abstract]
12.
Shinozaki K, Suzuki M, Ikebuchi M, Takaki H, Hara Y,
Tsushima M, Harano Y. Insulin resistance associated with compensatory
hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for
vasospastic angina. Circulation. 1995;92:17491757.
13. Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, Malaspina D, Mancia G. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1987;5:9398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Schillaci G, Borgioni C,
Ciucci A, Battistelli M, Guerrieri M, Gatteschi C, Zampi I, Santucci A,
Santucci C, Reboldi G. Ambulatory blood pressure: an independent
predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension.
Hypertension. 1994;24:793801.
15. National Diabetes Data Group. Report of Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:11831197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Harano Y, Ohgaku S, Kosugi K, Yasuda H, Nakano T,
Kobayashi M, Hidaka H, Izumi K, Kashiwagi A, Shigeta Y. Clinical
significance of altered insulin sensitivity in diabetes mellitus
assessed by glucose, insulin and somatostatin infusion. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52:982987.
17. Ikebuchi M, Suzuki M, Kageyama A, Hirose J, Yokota C, Ikeda K, Shinozaki K, Todo R, Harano Y. Modified method using a somatostatin analogue, octreotide acetate (Sandostatin®), to assess in vivo insulin sensitivity. Endocr J. 1996;43:125130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Suzuki M, Shinozaki K, Kanazawa A, Hara Y, Hattori Y,
Tsushima M, Harano Y. Insulin resistance as an independent risk factor
for carotid wall thickening. Hypertension. 1996;28:593598.
19. Harada M, Harano Y, Kojima H, Suzuki M, Furusawa S, Nishino Y, Uchigaki T, Hyodo H, Shigeta Y. Computerized glucose clamp method for the determination of insulin sensitivity in diabetic subjects. Jpn J Med. 1987;26:2530.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Greenfield MS, Doberne L, Kraemer F, Tobey T, Reaven G. Assessment of insulin resistance with the insulin suppression test and the euglycemic clamp. Diabetes. 1981;30:387392.[Abstract]
21. Sharma AM, Ruland K, Spies KP, Distler A. Salt sensitivity in young normotensive subjects is associated with a hyperinsulinemic response to oral glucose. J Hypertens. 1991;9:329335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Sharma AM, Schorr U, Distler A. Insulin resistance in
young salt-sensitive normotensive subjects. Hypertension. 1993;21:273279.
23. Chen JW, Lin SJ, Jen SL, Ting CT, Lee WL, Chang MS, Hsu NW, Wang PH. Differential glucose tolerance in dipper and nondipper essential hypertension: the implications of circadian blood pressure regulation on glucose tolerance in hypertension. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:17431748.[Abstract]
24.
Oshima T, Matsuura H, Matsumoto K, Kido K, Kajiyama G.
Role of cellular calcium in salt sensitivity of patients with essential
hypertension. Hypertension. 1988;11:703707.
25. Alexiewicz JM, Gaciong Z, Parise M, Karubian F, Massry SG, Campese VM. Effect of dietary sodium intake on intracellular calcium in lymphocytes of salt-sensitive hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5 536541.
26. Flack JM, Sowers JR. Epidemiologic and clinical aspects of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Am J Med. 1991;91(suppl IA):11S21S.
27. Sowers JR. At the cutting edge: insulin resistance and hypertension. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1990;74:C87C89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Moore RD, Rabovsky JL. Mechanism of insulin action on
resting membrane potential of frog skeletal muscle. Am J
Physiol. 1979;236:C249C254.
29.
Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Effects of
epinephrine on insulin-mediated glucose uptake in whole body
and leg muscle in humans: role of blood flow. Am J
Physiol. 1992;263:E199E204.
30. Gaboury CL, Simonson DC, Seely EW, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Relation of pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II and insulin resistance in hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:22952300.
31. Gomi T, Shibuya Y, Sakurai J, Hirawa N, Hasegawa K, Ikeda T. Strict dietary sodium reduction worsens insulin sensitivity by increasing sympathetic nervous activity in patients with primary hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:10481055.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Yokota C, Ikebuchi M, Suzuki M, Norioka M, Ikeda K, Shinozaki K, Harano Y. Insulin resistance rather than hyperinsulinemia more closely associated with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1995;17:523536.
33. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:15951607.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q. Fu, W. Vongpatanasin, and B. D. Levine Neural and Nonneural Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Elderly Hypertension: Can Exercise Training Help? Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 787 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fujita Insulin resistance and salt-sensitive hypertension in metabolic syndrome Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3102 - 3107. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. H. Schulman, P. Aranda, L. Raij, M. Veronesi, F. J. Aranda, and R. Martin Surgical Menopause Increases Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1168 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Foy, K. L. Foley, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., D. C. Goff Jr., E. Mayer-Davis, and L. E. Wagenknecht Physical Activity, Insulin Sensitivity, and Hypertension among US Adults: Findings from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2006; 163(10): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Kolovou, D. Ch. Daskalova, S. A. Iraklianou, E. N. Adamopoulou, N. D. Pilatis, G. C. Hatzigeorgiou, and D. V. Cokkinos Postprandial Lipemia in Hypertension J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2003; 22(1): 80 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. El-Gharbawy, J. M. Kotchen, C. E. Grim, M. Kaldunski, R. G. Hoffmann, Z. Pausova, D. Gaudet, F. Gossard, P. Hamet, and T. A. Kotchen Predictors of Target Organ Damage in Hypertensive Blacks and Whites Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 761 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |