(Hypertension. 2000;35:1160.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Division of Hypertension (A.P., X.-L.C., J.G.D.), Department of Medicine, and the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (U.H.), School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio; and the Department of Pharmacology (A.P.) and CIMMBA (M.Z.), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Correspondence to Dr Janice G. Douglas, Division of Hypertension, Department of Medicine W165, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-4982. E-mail jgd3{at}po.cwru.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: epithelial cells protein kinases hypertension, essential angiotensin II
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because MAPKs have been linked to regulation of NHE activity and epithelial cell Ang II signaling,11 13 14 the present studies were designed to test the hypothesis that enhanced basal and/or Ang IIstimulated activity of MAPKs in proximal tubular epithelium may be associated with SHR cells. Basal levels as well as stress- and Ang IIdependent activation of endogenous ERK1/2, c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK1), and p38 were assessed in renal cortex specimens, and well-differentiated, proximal tubule cell lines were derived from SHR and WKY.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein Determination
Protein concentrations were measured by the BCA method (Pierce
Chemical Co).
Cell Culture
Immortalized epithelial cell lines derived from renal proximal
tubules of normotensive WKY 1292 (clone 8) and SHR 0193 (clone 2) rats
were grown to confluence on Ethicon collagen-coated 30-mm Millicell-CM
culture plate inserts.8 The culture medium was
rat-RTE.
Monolayer Resistance
Confluence of monolayers was assessed quantitatively by
measuring the electrical resistance with a Millicell ERS probe as
previously described.17 The electrical resistance of the
monolayers for the reported experiments was 510±18
cm2
and 390±17
cm2 for the SHR and WKY cell lines,
respectively, which is in accordance with the values reported
previously.8
[35S]-Labeling
Cells were uniformly labeled by growing them for 8 to 12 hours
in methionine-free rat-RTE medium in the presence of 100 µCi/mL of
[35S]-L-methionine (1000
Ci/mmol, New England Nuclear [NEN]).
MAPK Activity
MAPK protein levels and activities were measured in confluent,
polarized monolayers. Before each experiment, serum and EGF were
omitted from the medium for 1 night. Stimuli were added to either the
inside or the outside of the insert to differentially stimulate the
apical or basolateral side of the polarized monolayers, respectively.
JNK1 and ERK1 activities
were measured by immunoprecipitation, with polyclonal antibodies
against JNK1 and
ERK1, and immune-complex kinase assays as
previously described.15 16 The
anti-JNK1 antibody recognized all JNK isoforms,
and the anti-ERK1 antibody recognized both
ERK1 and ERK2, but
preferentially bound to ERK1. The
activated form of p38 was measured by
immunoblotting with anti-phospho p38
antibody.
Western Blot Analysis
Cell lysates containing 50 to 100 µg proteins were subjected
to 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
proteins were then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane (Millipore) by electroblotting. The blots were treated with
rabbit polyclonal antibodies against JNK1,
ERK1, or p38 overnight at 4°C. Immunoreactive
proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. The intensities
of the bands corresponding to MAPKs were quantified by densitometric
analysis (scanned on UMAX MagicScan with Adobe Photoshop and
analyzed with the software package IMAGE, United States
Biochemical).
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM for (n) experiments with
duplicate measurements. Differences between groups were tested for
significance by Students t test for unpaired data, and a
P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Materials
Purified rabbit IgG, anti-rabbit IgG coupled to agarose beads,
myelin basic protein, PMSF, dithiothreitol, R24571, okadaic acid, and
anisomycin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
[
32P]ATP and
[35S]-L-methionine were from NEN.
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against JNK1,
ERK1, and p38 as well as the recombinant
activating factor 2 (ATF-2) protein were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-phospho p38 polyclonal antibody was from New
England Biolabs. Aprotinin, leupeptin, fetal bovine serum, and
trypsin-EDTA were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim.
Collagen dispersion was from Ethicon, Inc. Millicell-CM culture plate
inserts (diameter 30 mm) were from Millipore.
Acrylamide, TEMED, ammonium persulfate, and Coomassie
brilliant blue were from Bio-Rad Laboratories. [Sar]-Ang II was from
Upstate Biotechnology.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Taken at face value, the observation of similar levels of MAPK activities in SHR and WKY renal cortex seems inconsistent with the hypothesis that these enzymes are responsible for elevated Na+ transport in the proximal tubules in SHR. However, the finding that the fraction of activated to total ERK1 and JNK1 was higher in SHR than in WKY suggests intrinsic strain differences that complicate the interpretation of the results. To get insight into the cellular basis of the differences between SHR and WKY strains and to study MAPKs under more controlled conditions than is possible in vivo, further experiments were performed with proximal tubule cell lines derived from these 2 rat strains.8
MAPK Activities in WKY and SHR Cell Lines
Basal Activities
Similar to renal cortex specimens, baseline activity of
ERK1/2 and JNK1 were the
same in both cell lines (ERK1 1026±200 cpm and
830±95 cpm with n=5; JNK1 128±9 cpm and 122±15
cpm with n=9, for WKY and SHR, respectively).
Stimulated JNK1 Activity
JNK1 is activated by a number of
different stresses, including application of certain drugs, such as
anisomycin.18 First, we evaluated whether differences
existed between apical and basolateral stimulation in response to
anisomycin because epithelial monolayers often exhibit different
properties when stimulated from different sides.19 20
Activation of JNK1 by apical application was
significantly greater than by basolateral application, as shown for WKY
monolayers in Figure 1A. Furthermore, 100
nmol/L anisomycin stimulated JNK1 more in WKY
cells than in SHR cells, although basal levels of
JNK1 activity were the same. Figure 1B
illustrates the time-dependence of activation in WKY cells whereby the
maximal activity was observed at 15 minutes with stimulation of 300%
over basal levels. In contrast, anisomycin did not significantly
stimulate JNK1 in the SHR cells (Figure 1B) as the increase was
30%. At a higher concentration of
500 nmol/L, anisomycin was able to increase JNK1
activity in SHR cells, although this activation was still considerably
less than in WKY cells (179±45% and 444±80% increase over basal
activity at 15 minutes for SHR and WKY, respectively, n=3).
|
We next compared the response to Ang II, which represents a physiological stimulus involved in the regulation of salt reabsorption. Experiments throughout this study were performed with [Sar]-Ang II, although the plain term Ang II is used. At 0.1 µmol/L, Ang II significantly stimulated JNK1 activity in the WKY cell line (Figure 2a). Interestingly, the time course of activation was different with apical and basolateral stimulation. With basolateral stimulation, JNK1 was maximally activated within 5 minutes, whereas with apical stimulation, activation increased more slowly and became stable at 30 minutes. Moreover, the Ang II stimulation of JNK1 activity in WKY cells was concentration dependent with maximal activation at 1 µmol/L [Sar]-Ang II (50% over basal levels, Figure 2b). Interestingly, Ang II did not change JNK1 activity in SHR cells (Figure 2c), even at concentrations as high as 10 µmol/L (data not shown). To test whether the differences can be explained on the basis of regulation of MAPKs by phosphatases,21 JNK1 activity was measured in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. The addition of R24571 (10 µmol/L) and okadaic acid (100 nmol/L), which inhibit phosphatase 2B and phosphatases 1 and 2A, respectively, did not augment JNK1 activation by Ang II, suggesting that phosphatases are not responsible for the weaker JNK1 activation in SHR cells (Table 2).
|
|
ERK1 Activity in WKY and SHR Proximal Tubule Cells
Because Ang II has been reported to stimulate ERK in rabbit
proximal tubular epithelial14 and opossum kidney
epithelial cells13 and has been suggested to be an
important signaling modulator of ion transport,11 the
ability of Ang II to stimulate ERK1 in proximal
tubule cell lines was assessed. Ang II stimulated
ERK1 activity in a time- and
concentration-dependent manner in confluent WKY epithelial monolayers.
Significant stimulation of ERK1 activity was
already seen by 5 minutes when Ang II (0.1 µmol/L) was added to
the basolateral side, an effect that persisted for at least 15 minutes
(data not shown). Dose-response relationships differed between apical
and basolateral application of Ang II; for example, 0.1 µmol/L
Ang II was required for maximal stimulation on the basolateral side,
whereas 1 µmol/L Ang II was required for maximal stimulation on
the apical side (Figure 3a). As with
JNK1, Ang II did not significantly stimulate
ERK1 in the SHR cell line (Figure 3b).
|
MAPKs Levels in SHR and WKY Proximal Tubule Cell Lines
One reason JNK1 and ERKs were not
activated in SHR cells by either stress or Ang II might be that
the protein levels of these particular MAPKs were reduced in SHR; thus,
the fractional activation under basal conditions was already close to
the maximum. This explanation is supported by the findings in cortex
specimens (ie, the greater fractional activation in SHR reported
above). Therefore, the protein levels of MAPKs were also determined in
the cell lines by immunoblot analysis.
Interestingly, SHR cells contained lower levels of both JNK1 isoforms (p46 and p54), than WKY cells. Figure 4a illustrates representative data for the p46 JNK1 isoform. Densitometric analysis of all immunoblots performed showed that, despite using the same amount of protein from cell lysates, JNK1 expression in SHR cells was approximately one fourth of that observed in WKY cells (SHR/WKY= 0.25±0.03 densitometric units, P<0.01, n=3). A second approach to measure JNK1 expression was to label cells for 8 to 12 hours with [35S]-methionine, immunoprecipitate JNK1, and then visualize it by means of autoradiography. Again, [35S]-methioninelabeled JNK1 was less in SHR than in WKY cells (Figure 4b).
|
The same experimental approach was used to measure ERK1 expression. As shown in Figure 4c, Western blot analysis revealed a lower amount of ERK1 in SHR compared with WKY cells. Densitometric analysis produced a ratio of 0.58±0.15 for ERK1 expression in SHR relative to WKY cells (P<0.05, n=4). The anti-ERK1 antibody also recognized ERK2; however, the expression of ERK2 was the same in both cell lines. Similar results were obtained with [35S]-methionine labeling (Figure 4d).
p38 MAPK Activity and Expression
The levels of activated p38 were determined by
immunoblotting with anti-phospho p38 antibody. In
contrast to what was found for JNK1 and
ERK1, p38 activity appeared the same in WKY and
SHR cells stimulated for 20 minutes with 100 nmol/L anisomycin (Figure 5a). Moreover, immunoblot
analysis did not reveal any difference in the amount of this
member of the MAPK superfamily (Figure 5b). The ratio of protein
levels of ERK1 in SHR/WKY was 1.00±0.05 (n=3).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of MAPKs had been associated with higher NHE activity.9 10 11 12 13 14 Therefore, the results also suggest that neither ERK1 or JNK1 can be responsible for enhanced activation of NHE by Ang II in SHR epithelial cells. This conclusion differs strikingly from vascular smooth muscle cells, wherein increased activity of ERKs or a difference in the time-dependency of activation was observed in SHR as compared with WKY. Moreover, the differences in VSMC were due to altered regulation of MAPK phosphorylation and dephosphorylation rather than a difference in the relative abundance of the enzyme.22 23 Of interest is the observation that p38 and ERK2 levels were the same in both the cell lines and the tissue samples, which demonstrated that deficit protein expression does not involve all members of the MAPK superfamily.
The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of essential hypertension are complex and are influenced by many interrelated factors.24 The kidney is central to the pathogenesis of high blood pressure in salt-sensitive individuals, because its dominant role in the regulation of Na+ homeostasis. Studies on SHR suggest proximal tubular abnormalities in several signal transduction pathways, apart from MAPKs, that can affect NHE-3 activity and Na+ absorption.5 6 7 Our data document comparable basal levels of JNK1 and ERK1 activities and deficient activation in SHR cells and therefore suggest that the MAPK superfamily is unlikely to be a crucial regulatory factor for enhanced activity of proximal tubular NHE-3. This conclusion leaves other altered signaling pathways as possible explanations, such as defective receptor/G-protein coupling. Evidence for an abnormal G-protein coupling in SHR is emerging in the case of D1 agonist inhibition of NHE-3.5 25
The present study demonstrates different time-course and dose-response relationships when Ang II was added to the apical versus basolateral side of the polarized monolayer. This is not surprising given that the Ang II receptor subtypes differ in the 2 compartments.18 26 27 The apical angiotensin type 2 (AT2) receptor is linked to phospholipase A2 and arachidonic acid and inhibits Na+ reabsorption. Arachidonic acid is also critical for MAPK activation.14 15 By contrast, the basolateral angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor has been linked to enhanced Na+ reabsorption, decrements in cAMP, and activation of MAPK as well.28 29 30 The mechanism of AT1-mediated MAPK activation has not been determined. Several reports have documented that the AT1 receptor increases activity of NHE,31 32 whereas the AT2 receptor decreases activity of the NHE-3.33 However, the importance of MAPKs as modulators of ion transport under physiological circumstances has not been resolved. This question remains of significant potential interest despite the exclusion of MAPKs as crucial factors for increasing proximal tubule Na+ transport in SHR.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 7, 1999; first decision September 28, 1999; accepted December 28, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Roman RJ, Cowley AW. Abnormal pressure-diuresis-natriuresis response in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:F199F205.
3. Kawabe K, Watanabe TX, Shiono K, Sokabe H. Influence on blood pressure of renal isografts between spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats, utilizing the F1 hybrids. Jpn Heart J. 1978;19:886894.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Alpern RJ. Cell mechanisms of proximal
tubule acidification. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:79114.
5. Albrecht FE, Drago J, Felder RA, Printz MP, Eisner M, Robillard JE, Sibley DR, Westphal HJ, Jose PA. Role of the D1A dopamine receptor in the pathogenesis of genetic hypertension. J Clin Invest.. 1996;97:22832288.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cheng HF, Wang JL, Vinson GP, Harris RC. Young SHR express increased type 1 angiotensin II receptors in renal proximal tubule. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:F10F17.
7. Thomas D, Harris PJ, Morgan TO. Altered responsiveness of proximal tubule fluid reabsorption of peritubular angiotensin II in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1990;8:407410.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Woost PG, Orosz DE, Jin W, Frisa PS, Jacobberger JW, Douglas JG, Hopfer U. Immortalization and characterization of proximal tubule cells derived from kidneys of spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. Kidney Int. 1996;50:125134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Morduchowicz GA, Sheikh-Hamad D, Jo OD, Nord EP, Lee DBN, Yanagawa N. Increased Na/H antiport activity in the renal brush border membrane of SHR. Kidney Int. 1989;36:576581.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Dagher G, Sauterey C. H+ pump and Na+-H+ exchange in isolated single proximal tubules of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1992;10:969978.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Bianchini L, LAllemain G, Pouysségur J.
The p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade is
determinant in mediating activation of the
Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE1
isoform) in response to growth factors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:271279.
12.
Pages G, Lenormand P, LAllemain G, Chambard JC,
Meloche S, Pouysségur J. Mitogen-activated protein
kinases p42 mapk and 44 mapk are required for fibroblast proliferation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:83198323.
13. Terada Y, Tomita K, Homma MK, Nonoguchi H, Yang T, Yamada T, Yuasa Y, Krebs EG, Marumo F. Sequential activation of MAP kinase cascade by angiotensin II in opossum kidney cells. Kidney Int. 1995;48:18011809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Dulin NO, Sorakin A, Harwalker S, Douglas JG. Arachidonic acid mediated activation of MAPK by angiotensin II in rabbit proximal tubular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:789.
15.
Cui X-L, Douglas JG. Arachidonic
acid activates c-jun N-terminal kinase through NADPH oxidase in
rabbit proximal tubular epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1997;94:37713776.
16.
Parenti A, Morbidelli L, Cui X-L, Douglas JG,
Hood JD, Granger HJ, Ledda F, Ziche M. Nitric oxide is an upstream
signal of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced
extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in postcapillary
endothelium. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:42204226.
17. Romero MF, Douglas JG, Eckert RL, Hopfer U, Jacobberger JW. Development and characterization of rabbit proximal tubular epithelial cell lines. Kidney Int. 1992;42:11301144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Cano E, Hazzalin CA, Mahadevan LC.
Anisomycin-activated protein kinase p45 and p55 but non
mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1 and 2 are implicated in
the induction of c-fos and c-jun. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:73527362.
19.
Jacobs L, Douglas JG. Angiotensin II
type 2 receptor subtype mediates phospholipase A2-dependent signaling
in rabbit proximal tubular epithelial cells. Hypertension. 1996;28:663668.
20.
Dulin NO, Alexander LD, Harwalker S, Falk JR,
Douglas JG. Phospholipase A2-mediated activation of
mitogen-activated protein kinase by angiotensin II.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:80988102.
21. Keyse SM. An emerging family of dual specificity MAP kinase phosphatases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1265:152160.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Lucchesi PA, Bell JM, Willis LS, Byron KL, Corson
MA, Berk BC. Calcium-dependent MAP kinase activation in spontaneously
hypertensive rat vascular smooth muscle defines a hypertensive signal
transduction phenotype. Circ Res. 1996;78:962970.
23. Wilkie N, Ng LL, Boarder MR. Angiotensin II responses of vascular smooth muscle cells from hypertensive rats: enhancement at the level of p42 and p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;122:209216.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Hepinstall RH. Hypertension I: essential hypertension. In: Hepinstall RH, ed. Pathology of the Kidney. Vol 2. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Co; 1992: 9511028.
25. Xu J, Albrecht FE, Li XX, Ladines CA, Hopfer U, Jose PA. Differential regulation of Na-H exchanger-3 by D-1 receptors and G-alpha S in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:338A. Abstract.
26. Douglas JG, Hopfer U. Novel aspect of angiotensin receptors and signal transduction in the kidney. Annu Rev Physiol. 1994;56:649669.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Li L, Wang YP, Capparelli AW, Jo OD, Yanagawa N.
Effect of luminal angiotensin II on proximal tubule fluid
transport: presence of apical phospholipase A2. Am J
Physiol. 1994;266:F202F209.
28.
Zhou J, Sims C, Chang CH, Berti-Mattera L, Hopfer
U, Douglas J. Proximal tubular epithelial cells possess a novel
42-kilodalton guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory
protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:75327535.
29. Houillier P, Chambrey R, Achard JM, Froissart M, Poggioli J, Paillard M. Signaling pathways in the biphasic effect on angiotensin II on apical Na/H antiport activity in proximal tubule. Kidney Int. 1996;50:14961505.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Inagami T, Eguchi S, Numaguchi K, Motley ED, Tang H, Matsumoto T, Yamakawa T. Cross-talk between angiotensin II receptors and the tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:S57S61.
31.
Cingolani HE, Alvarez BV, Ennis IL, Camilion de
Hurtado MC. Stretch-induced alkalinization of feline papillary muscle:
an autocrine-paracrine system. Circ Res. 1998;83:77580.
32. Bell PD, Peti-Peterdi J. Angiotensin II stimulates macula densa basolateral sodium/hydrogen exchange via type 1 angiotensin II receptors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:S225S229.
33. Haithcock D, Jiao H, Cui XL, Hopfer U, Douglas JG. Renal proximal tubular AT2 receptor: signaling and transport. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:S69S74.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Zeng, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, D. He, L. Huang, P. Yu, S. Zheng, J. E. Jones, L. D. Asico, U. Hopfer, et al. Activation of D3 Dopamine Receptor Decreases Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Rat Renal Proximal Tubule Cells Circ. Res., September 1, 2006; 99(5): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hus-Citharel, X. Iturrioz, P. Corvol, J. Marchetti, and C. Llorens-Cortes Tyrosine Kinase and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellularly Regulated Kinase Differentially Regulate Intracellular Calcium Concentration Responses to Angiotensin II/III and Bradykinin in Rat Cortical Thick Ascending Limb Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 451 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zeng, U. Hopfer, L. D. Asico, G. M. Eisner, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose Altered AT1 Receptor Regulation of ETB Receptors in Renal Proximal Tubule Cells of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 926 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zeng, Z. Wang, U. Hopfer, L. D. Asico, G. M. Eisner, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose Rat Strain Effects of AT1 Receptor Activation on D1 Dopamine Receptors in Immortalized Renal Proximal Tubule Cells Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sugita, H. Sugita, and M. Kaneki Increased Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 Serine Phosphorylation and Stress-Activated Protein Kinase/c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Activation Associated With Vascular Insulin Resistance in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2004; 44(4): 484 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Han, S. H. Park, and Y. J. Lee Signaling cascade of ANG II-induced inhibition of {alpha}-MG uptake in renal proximal tubule cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): F634 - F642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stambe, D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, P. A. Hill, J. Dowling, and R. C. Atkins p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation and Cell Localization in Human Glomerulonephritis: Correlation with Renal Injury J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 326 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |