Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2000;36:343-349

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozàkovà, M.
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozàkovà, M.
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Hypertension. 2000;36:343.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Coronary Vasodilator Capacity and Epicardial Vessel Remodeling in Physiological and Hypertensive Hypertrophy

Michaela Kozàkovà; Fabio Galetta; Luisa Gregorini; Giovanni Bigalli; Ferdinando Franzoni; Costantino Giusti; Carlo Palombo

From the Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR (M.K., G.B.), and Department of Internal Medicine (F.G., F.F., C.G., C.P.), University of Pisa, and Clinica Medica Generale, Ospedale Maggiore, University of Milan (L.G.), Italy.

Correspondence to Carlo Palombo, MD, Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, via Savi 8, 56 126 Pisa, Italy. E-mail palombo{at}po.ifc.pi.cnr.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The aim of this study was to compare resting coronary flow velocity, determinants of myocardial oxygen demand, and coronary vasodilator capacity in subjects with physiological, exercise-induced, and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. Sixteen healthy sedentary men, 16 endurance athletes, and 16 hypertensive subjects (mean±SEM for left ventricular mass index: 94.9±5.5, 184.6±8.4, 154.4±9.5 g/m2, respectively) were studied by transesophageal and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary flow velocity in left anterior descending artery and cross-sectional area of left main artery were assessed at rest and during dipyridamole-induced vasodilation. Myocardial oxygen demand was estimated through rate-pressure product, left ventricular wall stress, and inotropic function. Coronary flow reserve and minimum coronary resistance were comparable to those of sedentary men in athletes (mean±SEM: 3.23±0.16 versus 3.60±0.18 and 0.96±0.06 versus 1.04±0.04 mm Hg · s · cm-1), while in hypertensive subjects they were decreased and increased, respectively (mean±SEM: 2.31±0.08 and 1.21±0.10 mm Hg · s · cm-1; P<0.05 for both). Resting flow velocity was directly related to rate-pressure product in sedentary men and athletes and also to wall stress in athletes, while these correlations were absent in hypertensives. Dilation of left main artery after dipyridamole was significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary men and hypertensive subjects (mean±SEM for area change: 32.9±3.7% versus 12.8±2.5% and 6.4±3.3%; P<0.05 and 0.01). These data indicate that vasodilator capacity of coronary microcirculation is not impaired in athletes with physiological hypertrophy, in contrast to hypertensive patients. The relationship between resting flow velocity and determinants of oxygen demand is preserved in physiological hypertrophy but missing in hypertensive hypertrophy. Furthermore, the vasodilator capacity of coronary macrocirculation is also enhanced in exercise-trained subjects.


Key Words: hypertrophy, left ventricular • circulation • exercise • aging


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represents an adaptive mechanism by which the heart normalizes wall stress and preserves left ventricular (LV) function. Both systemic hypertension and chronic exercise training may induce LVH. While hypertensive LVH represents a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality1 and is associated with an impairment in coronary vasodilator capacity,2 3 chronic exercise training is supposed to improve cardiovascular capacity and to reduce morbidity and mortality.4 5 Experimental studies suggest an exercise-induced protective adaptation in coronary circulation, which may include both structural changes6 7 and changes in vasomotor responses.8 9 10 It was demonstrated that in normotensive animals, such as rat,11 12 dog,13 and swine,7 chronic exercise training results in an improvement of coronary vasodilator reserve. By contrast, studies comparing coronary vasodilator capacity in hypertensive patients with LVH and physically trained subjects with similar age and LV mass are not available.

The present study was designed to compare coronary function, including resting coronary flow and its determinants, vasodilator capacity of conductive and resistive coronary vessels, and remodeling of epicardial vessels in highly trained subjects with physiological LVH, hypertensive subjects with a similar degree of LVH, and healthy sedentary men with normal LV mass. In addition, the effect of aging on coronary vasodilator capacity was compared between hypertensive and exercise-trained subjects.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The study population consisted of 48 subjects, all men: 16 healthy, untrained volunteers (aged 18 to 62 years), 16 endurance athletes (marathon runners and triathletes) with mild to moderate LVH (aged 20 to 79 years), and 16 hypertensive subjects with mild to moderate LVH (aged 41 to 68 years). The mean duration of exercise conditioning in athletes was 28±15 years. LVH in hypertensive subjects and athletes was defined as LV mass index value of 117 g/m2.14 Coronary artery disease, valvular or primary myocardial heart disease, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were ruled out. None of the controls and athletes was receiving any therapy at the time of the study; in hypertensive patients, calcium antagonists were discontinued at least 72 hours before the study, and all other medications had been stopped for at least 1 week. The study was approved by the internal ethics committee, and all participants provided informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Protocol
The proximal part of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was visualized from the upper esophagus by a transesophageal approach, according to a previously described procedure.15 Blood flow was detected by color and spectral Doppler, and basal coronary flow velocity recording was acquired (SONOS 2500, Hewlett-Packard Co). Digitized "zoomed" 2-dimensional images of the left main coronary artery (LMA) were stored for diameter measurement.

To assess LV wall stress and inotropic function, the probe was briefly advanced to the stomach, and transgastric short-axis view of the left ventricle at the level of papillary muscle was acquired (in both 2-dimensional and M-mode images). Subsequently, the probe was withdrawn to the upper esophagus, and the Doppler signal from LAD was obtained again. Basal coronary flow velocity was remeasured, and high-dose infusion of dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg for 9 minutes) was started through an indwelling 18-gauge cannula in an antecubital vein. The Doppler signal from the LAD was recorded continuously during dipyridamole infusion and for 8 minutes afterward. Flow velocity was measured by pulsed Doppler; when the velocity exceeded the Doppler limit, continuous-wave Doppler was used. The LMA diameter was remeasured at the maximal flow response. At the end of the study, aminophylline 80 mg was injected in bolus to antagonize the effects of dipyridamole.

Throughout the study, 3-lead ECG and blood pressure (Finapres; Ohmeda) were continuously monitored, and 12-lead ECG was recorded every 2 minutes.

Echocardiographic Indices
LV mass, peak systolic wall stress (PSWS) (pascals), end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) (pascals), and midwall fractional shortening (MFS) (%) were calculated according to the corresponding formulas.16 17 18 The measurements necessary for calculations were obtained from M-mode images of the left ventricle in transthoracic parasternal (for LV mass) or transesophageal transgastric (for PSWS, ESWS, and MFS) view. Triple product (TP) (mm Hg · bpm · g) was calculated by multiplying rate-pressure product (RPP) by LV mass.

Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Measurement
The average of instantaneous spectral peak velocities during cardiac cycle (APV) (cm/s) was measured rather than peak diastolic velocity because it better corresponds to volume flow rate.19 The reproducibility of these measurements was proven in previous studies.15 20 The mean of 5 beats was used for statistical analysis.

The maximal coronary vasodilator response to dipyridamole was assessed as both coronary flow reserve (CFR) and minimum coronary vascular resistance (MCR) (mm Hg · s · cm-1) and calculated according to the corresponding formulas.15 Furthermore, the ratio of resting coronary vascular resistance (CVR) to MCR (ie, resistance ratio [RR]) and the percent change from resting CVR to MCR ({Delta}CVR) (%) were calculated. The accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) Doppler for the assessment of coronary vasodilator capacity was preliminarily validated against intracoronary Doppler (Flow-wire, Cardiometrics) in a different group of 10 hypertensive patients undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain. The time interval between TEE and intracoronary Doppler study did not exceed 1 week.

In all study groups, correlations of resting APV with age, LV mass, resting RPP, TP, PSWS, ESWS, and MFS as well as correlation of APV after high-dose dipyridamole with age and LV mass were investigated by means of regression analysis.

Evaluation of Coronary Artery Caliber
LMA diameter was measured basally and during maximal flow response in 2-dimensional images. Measurements were provided by bow compasses from digitized "zoomed" diastolic images at 3 different segments of LMA, and the mean value was used to calculate LMA area. The mean of 5 cardiac cycles was used for statistical analysis. Correlations of LMA area at baseline and after dipyridamole with age and LV mass were investigated by means of regression analysis. The accuracy of TEE for the measurement of epicardial vessel diameter was preliminarily validated against quantitative coronary angiography in a different group of 20 subjects with normal coronary arteries undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography for chest pain.

Data Analysis
Data in the tables are expressed as mean±1 SEM. ANOVA was used when appropriate. To assess statistical significance between groups, Scheffé’s F test was applied, with a value of P<0.05 considered significant. Regression analysis was performed with simple linear and multiple stepwise models. Statistical analysis was performed by commonly available software (StatView SE+ Graphics, Abacus Concepts Inc). The agreement between TEE Doppler, intracoronary Doppler, and quantitative coronary angiography, respectively, was assessed according to the Bland-Altman approach.21


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Validation of the TEE approach for measurement of CFR and LMA diameter against intracoronary Doppler and quantitative coronary angiography, respectively, is presented in Figure 1.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Validation of TEE Doppler against intracoronary (i.c.) Doppler guidewire for the assessment of CFR (top) shows a good correlation and a mean difference of -0.41±0.70 cm/s, with all points within ±2 SD. Validation of TEE against quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for LMA diameter (bottom) also shows adequate correlation and a mean difference of +0.1±0.35 mm, with all points but 1 within ±2 SD.

Age and Echocardiographic Measurements
Mean age was comparable between hypertensive subjects and athletes and was slightly lower in healthy sedentary men (Table 1). Elderly subjects were defined as those aged >=65 years.22 LV mass and mass index were higher in athletes than in hypertensive subjects (P<0.05 for LV mass index) because of slightly higher LV diastolic diameter. MFS was reduced in hypertensive subjects (P<0.05 versus sedentary men). No differences between groups were observed for PSWS and ESWS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Main Vital Characteristics, LV Geometry, and Systolic Function in Study Population

Systemic Hemodynamics
Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure measured simultaneously with coronary flow velocity, both at rest and after high-dose dipyridamole, were higher in the hypertensive group (Table 2). Heart rate was lower in athletes than in hypertensive subjects. Resting RPP was higher in hypertensive subjects than in either sedentary men or athletes (P<0.01 versus both).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Systemic Hemodynamic Response to Dipyridamole Infusion

Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Responses
Resting APV of LAD flow was significantly higher in hypertensive subjects than in controls (P<0.05) and athletes (P<0.01) (Table 3). After administration of dipyridamole, no differences were observed between groups. Thus, in hypertensive subjects MCR was higher and CFR, RR, and {Delta}CVR were lower than in controls and athletes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Coronary Flow Velocity in LAD, Coronary Reserve, Minimum Coronary Resistance, and LMA Area (and Response to Dipyridamole Infusion)

Resting APV was directly related to resting RPP and TP in sedentary men and athletes (Figure 2) but not in hypertensive subjects; in athletes only, it was also related to PSWS (y=7.0+0.16x; r=0.52, P<0.05) and ESWS (y=3.0+0.41x; r=0.65, P<0.01). In stepwise multiple regression analysis, only RPP entered the regression against resting APV in sedentary men and athletes. Both resting and peak APV during dipyridamole were not related to LV mass or age in any group.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Scatterplots of correlation between basal APV, RPP, and TP in sedentary men (•) and endurance athletes ({triangleup}).

Response of Coronary Artery Caliber to Dipyridamole
The diameter of the LMA could be measured in 34 subjects (71%) (12 controls, 9 hypertensive subjects, and 13 athletes). LMA cross-sectional area at baseline and after administration of dipyridamole in the 3 groups is represented in Figure 3. In athletes, basal LMA area was slightly increased compared with sedentary men and significantly increased compared with hypertensive subjects (P<0.05). Athletes also had significantly enhanced dilation of LMA either as absolute values or percent increase (Table 3). In hypertensive subjects, an inverse relation was observed between age and LMA area (y=25.3-0.27x; r=-0.73, P<0.05). No relationship between LMA area and LV mass was observed in any group.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scatterplot of coronary left main cross-sectional area (CSA) at baseline (BASAL) and after dipyridamole (DIP) in sedentary men, athletes, and hypertensive patients. See also Table 3.

Effect of Aging on Coronary Flow Velocity at Rest and Coronary Vasodilator Capacity
The effect of aging on coronary circulation was not evaluated in healthy sedentary men since none of them reached the age of 65 years (Table 4). In hypertensive subjects, resting APV was comparable between subjects older and younger than 65 years, despite significant differences in blood pressure and LV wall stress. APV after administration of dipyridamole was lower in older hypertensive subjects, even if measured under higher perfusion pressure, thus resulting in higher MCR and lower CFR, RR, and {Delta}CVR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effect of Age on Coronary Function and Determinants of Myocardial Oxygen Demand

By contrast, older athletes demonstrated higher resting APV, mean blood pressure, RPP, and LV wall stress than younger ones. APV and mean blood pressure after administration of dipyridamole were slightly higher in older athletes. Thus, CFR was significantly lower in older athletes, but MCR, RR, and {Delta}CVR were comparable in older and younger athletes.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the features of coronary circulation in men with physiological, exercise-induced LVH and in hypertensive patients of similar age and LV mass. Detailed information on coronary vasodilator capacity in exercise-induced LVH was obtained in various animal models.6 7 8 11 12 13 However, studies in endurance athletes thus far provided data on morphology and function of LV myocardium23 24 and size and dilating capacity of large coronary arteries,24 25 while vasodilator capacity of coronary microcirculation was studied only in small series of young athletes without a control group of hypertensive patients with comparable LVH.26 27 In this study, we took advantage of an integrated echocardiographic approach that allowed us to assess, in a noninvasive manner, resting coronary flow velocity together with the main determinants of myocardial oxygen demand,16 17 18 as well as the response of coronary flow velocity and epicardial vessel diameter to intravenous infusion of a vasodilator agent.15 20

The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) in hypertensive LVH, the correlation between resting coronary flow velocity and determinants of myocardial oxygen demand is missing, while this relationship is preserved in physiological LVH; (2) maximal coronary vasodilation at the microcirculatory level is preserved in athletes with physiological LVH, while it is impaired in hypertensive LVH; (3) exercise training accompanied by physiological LVH is associated with a favorable remodeling and enhanced vasodilator capacity of the epicardial vessels; and (4) the effect of aging on coronary microcirculation is different between hypertensive subjects with LVH and athletes with physiological LVH.

Altogether, these results suggest that hypertensive disease, but not LVH per se, modifies the simple relationship between resting flow velocity and determinants of resting myocardial oxygen demand and that, as previously reported in exercising pigs,6 adaptive changes at the microvascular level parallel exercise-induced but not hypertensive LVH. In regard to conduit vessels, exercise training induces a favorable remodeling because of frequent high-flow stimuli caused by a substantial increase in myocardial oxygen demand during exercise load,24 25 while chronic pressure increment results in hypertensive vascular remodeling with thickening of the medial layer and normal or slightly decreased luminal diameter,28 with luminal narrowing progressively increasing with age. The enhanced dilating response of LMA to dipyridamole observed in athletes, 3-fold compared with sedentary controls and 5-fold compared with hypertensive patients, can be partially endothelium mediated29 30 and partially dependent on increased sensitivity of coronary smooth muscle to endothelium-independent vasodilator.25 31 Mechanisms underlying the age-dependent decrease of CFR are different between athletes and hypertensive subjects: in older athletes the reduction in CFR is primarily due to an increase in basal blood pressure, cardiac work, and flow velocity and not to a reduced vasodilator capacity. A similar pattern of age-related change in CFR was described for a normal population.32 In contrast, the further reduction in CFR observed in older hypertensive subjects was the result of a decreased hyperemic flow velocity and increased MCR, suggesting a role of aging in enhancing the impairment of coronary vasodilator capacity in arterial hypertension. Progressive increase in myocardial fibrosis with aging has been proposed as a possible mechanism limiting CFR in experimental models of hypertension.33

Study Limitations
TEE Doppler allows measurement of coronary flow velocity in LAD and vessel caliber at the LMA level. Consequently, volumetric flow cannot be assessed by this approach, and microcirculatory function must be evaluated through the flow velocity response to an arteriolar vasodilator. Actually, Wangler et al34 and Marcus et al35 demonstrated that changes in coronary blood flow velocity are closely correlated with changes in microsphere-measured myocardial perfusion, thus representing a good index of CFR, and we validated our TEE Doppler flow velocity measurements against those by intracoronary Doppler guidewire. The LMA diameter in this study was measured not to extrapolate volumetric flow but as an optimal window to assess remodeling and vasodilator capacity of epicardial coronary artery. Measurement of LMA diameter by the TEE approach shows relatively lower feasibility than Doppler recording of coronary flow; however, our validation of TEE against quantitative coronary angiography shows good accuracy of the measurement, when feasible, in keeping with the findings of Hildick-Smith and Shapiro36 using transthoracic echocardiography.

Conclusions
In contrast to findings in hypertensive patients with LVH, exercise-induced, physiological LVH in athletes of comparable age is associated with enhanced vasodilator capacity of coronary conductance vessels and preserved vasodilator capacity at the resistance artery level. In addition, the relationships between resting flow velocity and determinants of myocardial oxygen demand are preserved in exercise-induced but not in hypertensive LVH. These data indicate that LVH per se does not necessarily imply an impairment in flow-function coupling and coronary vasodilator capacity. Furthermore, the effect of aging on arteriolar vasodilator capacity seems to be different in hypertensive and physiological LVH.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Elena Barberini for editorial assistance.

Received November 3, 1999; first decision January 6, 2000; accepted April 6, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Sullivan JM, Zwaag RW, El-Zeky F, Ramanathan KB, Mirvid DM. Left ventricular hypertrophy: effect on survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:508–513.[Abstract]
  2. Schwartzkopff B, Motz W, Frenzel H, Vogt M, Knauer S, Strauer BE. Structural and functional alterations of the intramyocardial coronary arterioles in patients with arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1993;88:993–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Parodi O, Neglia D, Palombo C, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Marabotti C, Gallopin M, Simonetti I, LíAbbate A. Comparative effects of enalapril and verapamil on myocardial blood flow in systemic hypertension. Circulation. 1997;96:864–873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Eichner ER. Exercise and heart disease. Am J Med. 1983;75:1008–1023.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ehsani AA, Ogawa T, Miller TR, Spina RJ, Jilka SM. Exercise training improves left ventricular systolic function in older men. Circulation. 1991;83:96–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Breisch EA, White FC, Nimmo LE, McKirkan MD, Bloor CM. Exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy: a correlation of blood flow and microvasculature. J Appl Physiol. 1986;60:1259–1267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Laughlin MH, Overholser KA, Bhatte MJ. Exercise training increases coronary transport reserve in miniature swine. J Appl Physiol.. 1989;67:1140–1149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Parker JL, Oltman CL, Muller JM, Myers PR, Adams RH, Laughlin MH. Effect of exercise training on regulation of tone in coronary arteries and arterioles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26:1252–1261.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Muller JM, Myers PR, Laughlin MH. Vasodilator responses of coronary resistance arteries of exercise-trained pig. Circulation. 1994;89:2308–2314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Berdeux A, Ghaleh B, Dubois-Randé JL, Vigué B, Drieu La Rochelle C, Hittinger L, Giudicelli JF. Role of vascular endothelium in exercise-induced dilation of large epicardial coronary arteries in conscious dogs. Circulation. 1994;89:2799–2808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wicker P, Abdul-Samad M, Rakusan K, Tarazi RC, Healy B. Effects of chronic exercise on the coronary circulation in conscious rats with renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 1987;10:74–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Buttrick PM, Levine HA, Schaible TF, Ciambrone G, Scheuer J. Early increases in coronary vascular reserve in exercised rats are independent of cardiac hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:1861–1865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Laughlin MH, Diana JN, Tipton CM. Effects of exercise training on coronary reactive hyperemia and blood flow in the dog. J Appl Physiol. 1978;45:604–610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. De Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Koren MJ, Meyer RA, Laragh JH. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1056–1062.[Abstract]
  15. Kozàkovà M, Palombo C, Pratali L, Pittella G, Galetta F, L’Abbate A. Mechanism of coronary flow reserve impairment in human hypertension: an integrated approach by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Hypertension. 1997;29:551–559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977;55:613–618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reichek N, Wilson J, St. John Sutton M, Plappert TA, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld JW. Noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress: validation of the method and initial application. Circulation. 1982;65:99–108.[Free Full Text]
  18. deSimone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Ganau A, Saba PS, Alderman MH, Laragh JH. Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1444–1451.[Abstract]
  19. Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi M, Segal J. Validation of Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation. 1992;85:1899–1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kozàkovà M, Palombo C, Pratali L, Bigalli G, Marzilli M, Distante A, L’Abbate A. Assessment of coronary reserve by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography: head-to-head comparison between different modalities of dipyridamole and adenosine administration. Eur Heart J.. 1997;18:514–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–309.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Pearson AC, Gudipati CV, Labovitz AJ. Effect of aging on left ventricular structure and function. Am Heart J. 1991;121:871–875.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Douglas SP, O’Tool ML, Hiller WD, Reichek N. Left ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in ultraendurance athletes. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:805–809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Pelliccia A, Sparato A, Granata J, Biffi A, Caselli G, Alabiso A. Coronary arteries in physiological hypertrophy: echocardiographic evidence of increased proximal size in elite athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1990;11:120–126.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Haskell WL, Sims M, Bortz WM, St. Goar FG, Alderman EL. Coronary artery size and dilating capacity in ultradistance runners. Circulation. 1993;87:1076–1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Radvan J, Choudhury L, Sheridan DJ, Camici PG. Comparison of coronary vasodilator reserve in elite rowing athletes versus hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1621–1623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Toraa M, Pouillard F, Merlet P, Friemel F. Cardiac hypertrophy and coronary reserve in endurance athletes. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999;24:87–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Agabiti-Rosei E, Rizzoni D, Castellano M, Porteri E, Zulli R, Muiesan ML, Bettoni G, Salvetti M, Muiesan P, Giulini SM. Media:lumen ratio in human small resistance arteries is related to forearm minimal vascular resistance. J Hypertens. 1995;13:341–347.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wang J, Wolin MS, Hintze TH. Chronic exercise enhances endothelium-mediated dilation of epicardial coronary artery in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1993;73:829–838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lupi A, Buffon A, Finocchiaro ML, Conti E, Maseri A, Crea F. Mechanisms of adenosine-induced epicardial coronary artery dilatation. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:614–617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Stewart JM, Xu X, Ochoa M, Hintze TH. Exercise reduces epicardial coronary artery wall stiffness: roles of cGMP and cAMP. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:220–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Susic D, Nunez E, Hosoya K, Frohlich ED. Coronary hemodynamics in aging spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. J Hypertens. 1998;16:231–237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Wangler RD, Peters KG, Laughlin DE, Tomanek RJ, Marcus ML. A method for continuously assessing coronary blood flow velocity in rats. Am J Physiol. 1981;241:H816–H820.
  35. Marcus M, Wright C, Doty D, Eastham C, Laughlin D, Krumm P, Fastenow C, Brody M. Measurements of coronary velocity and reactive hyperemia in coronary circulation in humans. Circ Res. 1981;49:877–891.[Free Full Text]
  36. Hildick-Smith DJR, Shapiro LM. Transthoracic echocardiographic measurement of coronary artery diameter: validation against quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:893–897.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Varagic, E. D. Frohlich, D. Susic, J. Ahn, L. Matavelli, B. Lopez, and J. Diez
AT1 receptor antagonism attenuates target organ effects of salt excess in SHRs without affecting pressure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H853 - H858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S H Poulsen, N H Andersen, L Heickendorff, and C E Mogensen
Relation between plasma amino-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III and left ventricular longitudinal strain in essential hypertension
Heart, May 1, 2005; 91(5): 624 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. de Simone
Left Ventricular Geometry and Hypotension in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Mechanical Perspective
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2421 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Kozakova, E. Ferrannini, and C. Palombo
Relation Between Left Ventricular Midwall Function and Coronary Vasodilator Capacity in Arterial Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 528 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
O. Malo, F. Desjardins, J.-F. Tanguay, J.-C. Tardif, M. Carrier, and L. P. Perrault
Tetrahydrobiopterin and antioxidants reverse the coronary endothelial dysfunction associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in a porcine model
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2003; 59(2): 501 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xia, H. Y. Wen, M. E. Young, P. H. Guthrie, H. Taegtmeyer, and R. E. Kellems
Mammalian Target of Rapamycin and Protein Kinase A Signaling Mediate the Cardiac Transcriptional Response to Glutamine
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13143 - 13150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Kozakova, G. de Simone, C. Morizzo, and C. Palombo
Coronary Vasodilator Capacity and Hypertension-Induced Increase in Left Ventricular Mass
Hypertension, February 1, 2003; 41(2): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozàkovà, M.
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozàkovà, M.
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Coronary circulation