| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2000;36:477.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Framingham Heart Study (D.L., M.G.L., C.J.D.), Framingham, Mass; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (A.L.D.S., L.A.C.), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; the Department of Neurology (A.L.D.S., M.G.L., R.H.M.), the Cardiology Division (D.L.), the Genetics Program (A.L.D.S.), and the Hypertension Section (H.G.), Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; the Cardiology Division (C.J.D.), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (R.P.L.), Departments of Genetics and Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: genetics genome scan linkage epidemiology hypertension, essential blood pressure Framingham Heart Study
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A second approach to identifying BP/hypertension genes is through the characterization of candidate genes. In recent years, a growing list of candidate genes hypothesized to influence BP has emerged, and for several of these, evidence of linkage or association with hypertension has been reported.9 10 11 12 13 To date, none of these candidate genes, however, has been shown to contribute substantively to the variation in BP in the general population.
The third approach is a genome-wide scan to identify chromosomal regions linked to BP or hypertension. Genome scan results can guide candidate gene research by according greater priority to candidates that are located within areas of linkage. Genome scanning may also identify chromosomal regions within which no known candidate genes are recognized; such a finding has the potential to identify novel BP genes. Genome scans are being used in family-based BP studies and have led to reports of multiple linkages14 15 ; however, none of the reported linkages has attained statistical significance at the genome-wide level.
The Framingham Heart Study, which began in 1948, has meticulously characterized BP and other relevant phenotypes in 2 generations of participants. A 10-centiMorgan (cM) density genome-wide scan in subjects from the largest families within the study was recently completed. The repeated measurement of BP in 2 generations of study participants has permitted the characterization of unique, longitudinal BP phenotypes unavailable in other prospective, population-based studies. In contrast to BP studies that selectively recruited hypertensive subjects, Framingham Heart Study subjects were recruited without regard to their BP. Consequently, this study is able to assess linkage across the entire range of BP values. This feature of the study may enhance the detection of linkage, because genes that affect BP may contribute not only to hypertension but also to intermediate and low BP.16 In addition, our project began in an era when hypertension was not treated; the vast majority of BP measurements that compose our longitudinal BP phenotypes were obtained in untreated individuals, thereby permitting analyses of BP as a quantitative trait, even among hypertensive individuals.
This report presents the results of linkage analyses for longitudinally measured systolic and diastolic BP phenotypes obtained in original Framingham Heart Study participants, who attended routine biennial clinic visits beginning in 1948, and their offspring, who were examined repeatedly starting in 1971.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BP Phenotypes
Longitudinal BP Phenotypes
All BP measurements taken when subjects were aged 25 to 75 years
were analyzed. The following criteria were stipulated: (1)
there had to be at least 10 years between a subjects initial and
final examinations within the age range; (2) at least 4 examinations
within the age range were required for the original cohort and at least
3 for offspring cohort participants; and (3) height and weight
measurements were required, but if weight was missing, the most recent
measurement within 4 years was used.
Longitudinal BP data were analyzed for 8478 subjects who met these criteria by using a 2-stage procedure: (1) within-subject mean BP was calculated and (2) sample-wide regressions were used to adjust for age and body mass index, yielding a residual for each subject. These residuals constitute the longitudinal BP phenotypes. To calculate residuals, the following approach was taken. Let yij denote either systolic or diastolic BP for the jth examination on the ith participant, and let x1ij denote age and x2ij body mass index; also, let yi be the subjects mean BP, and let m1i and m2i be his or her mean age and mean body mass index in the stated age range. Sample-wide regressions were used to model BP as a linear function of the subjects mean age and mean body mass index. Specifically, the model can be stated as yi=ß0+ß1(m1i-m1)+ß2(m2i-m2 )+Ri, where m1 and m2 are sample means for age and body mass index. The residual Ri was used for the longitudinal phenotypes.
Systolic and diastolic BP phenotypes were analyzed independently. For diastolic BP, we analyzed data only for ages 25 to 54 years, because diastolic BP declines with advancing age, beginning around age 55 years.19 Also, regressions were conducted separately for each sex and cohort to accommodate sex and cohort effects.
Treated Observations
For subjects receiving hypertension treatment, the recorded
BP effectively is a right-censored value,20 since one
knows only that it is less than what the untreated value would be. We
addressed this problem by using a nonparametric algorithm
to adjust BPs for treatment effect. Data from 87 840 examinations on
10 313 subjects aged 18 to 97 years were analyzed; 13 481
(15.3%) observations reflected hypertension treatment. Separate
adjustments were conducted for men and women and for original and
offspring cohorts. Cubic regression models were fitted to account for
age effects, and then residuals were sorted from largest to smallest
within age groups (<35, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and
75+). Adjustment for treatment effect proceeded within each age group.
Let r(k) denote the kth residual
sorted in descending order; let BP(k) denote the
recorded BP and let h(k)=1 if the observation
was treated, 0 otherwise. For k=1 to n, the
adjusted residual can be computed as follows:
![]() |
Genotyping
DNA was extracted from whole-blood or buffy coat specimens by
using a standard protocol.21 22 DNA aliquots from subjects
within the largest Framingham Heart Study families were sent in 4
batches to the Mammalian Genotyping Service Laboratory at the
Marshfield Clinic (Marshfield, Wis), where a 10-cM density genome scan
was performed (marker set 8A, average heterozygosity 0.77). (Details
regarding markers and primers are available on the World Wide Web at
(http://www.marshmed.org/genetics/default.htm).) Genotype data
cleaning consisted of 2 steps. Family relationships were verified on
the basis of all available markers by using the sib_kin program of the
ASPEX (ftp://lahmed.stanford.edu/pub/aspex/index.html)
package. Mendelian inconsistencies were detected and eliminated
by using the GENTEST program
(http://www.sfbr.org/sfbr/public/software/software.html).
Heritability and Linkage Analysis
Heritability estimates were obtained by using variance-component
methodology implemented in the SOLAR package23
and were based on phenotype data from 1593 families for
systolic BP and 1300 families for diastolic BP.
Two-point and multipoint quantitative trait linkage analyses
were conducted on the standardized residuals for longitudinal
systolic and diastolic BPs by using the
SOLAR package. In this approach, genotypes are
imputed for untyped individuals, conditional on all other marker data
and pedigree structure, and the proportion of marker alleles shared
identical by descent among all relative pairs is estimated. Therefore,
individuals who are not genotyped but have phenotype
data contribute to the linkage results. The pedigree-based approach of
SOLAR is more powerful than sib-pair analysis when
data on extended families are available. Linkage is assessed by fitting
a polygenic model that does not incorporate genetic marker information
(ie, identical by descent status) and comparing it with models that
incorporate genotype data at a specific marker (2-point
analysis) or across a chromosome (multipoint analysis).
The log (base 10) of the ratio of the likelihoods of the polygenic and
marker-specific models is the log-of-the-odds (LOD) score, the
traditional measure of genetic linkage.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Two-Point and Multipoint Linkage
The highest 2-point LOD scores for long-term systolic and
diastolic BP traits for each of the 22 autosomes are
presented in Figure 1. For
systolic BP, 2-point LOD scores of 2.0 or higher were observed
for markers on chromosomes 5 and 10 and for 2 markers on chromosome 17
(Table 2). For diastolic BP,
the only 2-point LOD score of 2.0 or higher was on chromosome 9; a LOD
score of 1.6 was found on chromosome 17 (marker GATA25A04 [D17S1299])
and a LOD score of 1.9 for chromosome 18 (AFM321xc9 [D18S481]).
|
|
Figure 2 depicts the highest multipoint LOD scores for each of the autosomes. For systolic BP, multipoint LOD scores of 2.0 or higher were found on chromosome 17 at 2 regions (67 cM, LOD 4.7; and 94 cM, LOD 2.2; Figure 3), and an additional region of interest was identified on chromosome 5, with a multipoint LOD score of 1.9 at 23 cM. For diastolic BP, LOD scores of 2.1 were located on chromosome 17 at 74 cM (Figure 3) and on chromosome 18 at 7 cM (Figure 4). LOD scores for 2 locations that were suggestive in 2-point analyses (chromosome 10 for systolic BP and chromosome 9 for diastolic BP) diminished in the multipoint analyses (LOD scores of 0.72 and 1.2, respectively); examination of the 2-point data revealed that in each case, flanking markers showed little or no evidence of linkage (LOD scores ranged from 0.0 to 0.23), thereby reducing the magnitude of the LOD scores at these locations in the multipoint analysis.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results provide overwhelming evidence for a BP quantitative trait locus (QTL) in this interval. First, the LOD score substantially exceeds the minimum threshold for significant linkage in such a genome-wide study.24 Second, this interval has been implicated in hypertension.25 26 Third, there are plausible candidate genes in the interval. Fourth, the highest LOD score for diastolic BP lies in the same interval, providing corroborating evidence. Finally, this interval is homologous with BP QTLs in the rat and mouse.
A major challenge confronting the field of hypertension genetics is the need for better BP phenotypes.27 The Framingham Heart Study is unique among prospective epidemiological studies by virtue of its longevity and multigenerational structure. The serial measurement of BP in study participants facilitated the characterization of longitudinal BP phenotypes that are unavailable in newly recruited family studies. Specifically, BPs obtained in the same age interval were available for 2 generations of participants. Moreover, because the overwhelming majority of BP measurements were obtained in untreated subjects, we were able to study BP as a quantitative trait, in contrast to many current studies, which are limited to classification of qualitative phenotypes. Finally, this is 1 of a small number of large studies performing a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of linkage, rather than simply testing candidate genes or chromosome intervals, thereby permitting an unbiased search for BP QTLs. As a result, this comprehensive linkage study offers a unique and powerful approach to the detection of BP QTLs in the general population.
The LOD-1 interval (the support interval for which the LOD score equals the maximum minus 1) of the location of the chromosome 17 QTL spans a 16-cM interval at 17q1221, flanked by loci GGAA7D11 (D17S1293) and GATA49C09 (D17S1290). This interval is of great interest, as it has been previously implicated in BP variation in humans. Pseudohypoaldosteronism type II, an autosomal dominant form of hypertension with hyperkalemia, is linked to this interval.28 Moreover, 2 other studies have provided evidence of increased allele sharing among hypertensive siblings at this location, although neither of these studies reached the threshold for significance in a genome-wide analysis.25 26 This QTL is also of particular interest, because it is syntenic with a QTL on rat chromosome 10 that was reported to be linked to hypertension in several studies of spontaneously hypertensive rats.29 30 31 32 Furthermore, in a salt-sensitive hypertensive mouse strain, Paigen et al33 found linkage to BP on mouse chromosome 11 that is homologous with rat chromosome 10q and human chromosome 17q, indicating a remarkable concordance across 3 species.
Examination of databases reveals many known genes and expressed
sequence tags in or near the 16-cM QTL interval at 17q1221. No genes
that have been strongly implicated in BP variation lie in this
interval; however, potential candidate genes in the interval include
the
-1 thyroid receptors, the neuronal homologue of the
amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel, the
corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1, insulinlike growth
factorbinding protein-4, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-ß,
and the chloride/bicarbonate exchanger AE1. It also is possible that
the gene underlying the QTL locus has not yet been identified.
In addition to the chromosome 17q1221 interval, there are 2 additional regions yielding LOD scores >2.0 in multipoint analyses. One of these lies just distal on chromosome 17, and it is possible that this locus is independent of our largest peak. This second chromosome 17 peak overlaps the locus encoding the angiotensin-converting enzyme locus,34 a much-studied candidate gene for hypertension.10 The final locus is on chromosome 18, an interval that, to our knowledge, has not been previously implicated in BP variation. An interesting candidate gene in the chromosome 18 interval is the melanocortin receptor 2, which is the physiological receptor for corticotropin. Given the known effects of glucocorticoids on BP, it is of interest that receptors involved in the regulation of cortisol secretion lie in both the chromosome 17 and chromosome 18 intervals. The locations on chromosomes 5, 9, and 10 identified in 2-point analyses remain regions of interest, despite the reduced evidence of linkage in the multipoint analyses. Reasons for differences in LOD scores between 2-point and multipoint results include map or genotyping errors, large gaps between adjacent markers, or isolated false-positive results.
Study Strengths and Limitations
The Framingham Heart Study recruited 2 generations of subjects
without regard to their BP and followed them up prospectively. BP
phenotypes were sex-specific and were adjusted for age and body
mass index, the 2 leading determinants of BP in the general population.
The high estimates of heritability of our long-term BP
phenotypes, 0.57 for systolic and 0.56 for
diastolic BP, are considerably higher than those of
single-examination systolic and diastolic BP, 0.42
and 0.39, respectively, and are an indication of the far greater value
of the long-term BP phenotypes available in the Framingham
data.
The study has several potential limitations. First, although we believe
that the adjustment of BP for subjects who were receiving
antihypertensive drug treatment is a major strength of our study, it is
possible that it introduced a degree of misclassification. Of note,
evidence for linkage at our most promising regions remained when actual
BP measurements were used in place of adjusted values. Second, this
study is based on a sample of white subjects. The extent to which our
findings apply to other racial or ethnic groups, in whom the prevalence
of hypertension differs from that in whites and in whom a different mix
of genes may be important in BP regulation, deserves investigation.
Third, there are likely to be additional QTLs involved in the
expression of BP that we were unable to detect. Specifically, there was
ample power to detect a QTL that explains 25% to 30% of the variation
in BP. On the basis of the pedigree structure in the current study, we
had 75% to 80% power to detect LOD scores >3 for a QTL that explains
25% of the variation, and >90% power to detect a QTL that explains
30% of the variation, but <50% power to detect an LOD score >3 for
a QTL that explains 20% of the variation. To detect an LOD score >2,
we had
70% to 75% power for a QTL that explains 20% of the
variation but <50% power for a QTL that explains only 15% of the
variation. Fourth, it is possible that some of the positive linkage
findings represent false results. Based on the pedigree
structure of the 332 families used for linkage in this investigation,
simulation studies indicate that in the absence of linkage, the mean
number of 2-point LOD scores >2 that can be expected for this genome
scan is 0.5.35 We observed LOD scores >2 for 4 markers
for systolic BP and for 1 marker for diastolic BP,
several more than would be expected by chance.
Future Directions
Progress in identification of the chromosome 17q QTL can progress
on several fronts. Success in positional cloning of the genes
underlying pseudohypoaldosteronism type II and the syntenic rodent QTL
has the potential to identify the gene underlying this BP QTL. The
location of the QTL itself can potentially be refined by genotyping
additional markers and analyzing linkage in the critical interval.
Moreover, genes in the interval can be screened for variants, and these
can be examined for linkage disequilibrium with BP. Evaluation of the
functional consequences of identified variants in vitro or in animal
models can strengthen evidence for putative functional variants.
Ultimately, the genes contributing to BP variance will be pinpointed from BP QTLs, and their functional mutations will be identified. The completion of a draft version of the human genome sequence will identify and precisely locate roughly 90% of all human genes, greatly augmenting efforts to identify QTLs underlying human disease. Our finding of at least 1 BP QTL in the general population increases the likelihood that identification of the underlying gene or genes may prove clinically important for the evaluation and treatment of patients with hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 30, 2000; first decision June 12, 2000; accepted June 28, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit: genetic heterogeneity of Liddle syndrome.
Nat Genet. 1995;11:7682.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Ingelsson, M. J. Pencina, D. Levy, J. Aragam, G. F. Mitchell, E. J. Benjamin, and R. S. Vasan Aortic Root Diameter and Longitudinal Blood Pressure Tracking Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 473 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lieb, M. J. Pencina, T. J. Wang, M. G. Larson, K. J. Lanier, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, G. H. Tofler, J. B. Meigs, C. Newton-Cheh, et al. Association of Parental Hypertension With Concentrations of Select Biomarkers in Nonhypertensive Offspring Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 381 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. F. Lee, L. Sun, R. Kustra, and S. B. Bull EM-random forest and new measures of variable importance for multi-locus quantitative trait linkage analysis Bioinformatics, July 15, 2008; 24(14): 1603 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coylewright, J. F. Reckelhoff, and P. Ouyang Menopause and Hypertension: An Age-Old Debate Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 952 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Rosamond, K. Flegal, K. Furie, A. Go, K. Greenlund, N. Haase, S. M. Hailpern, M. Ho, V. Howard, B. Kissela, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2008 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): e25 - e146. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. I. Parikh, M. J. Pencina, T. J. Wang, E. J. Benjamin, K. J. Lanier, D. Levy, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, W. B. Kannel, and R. S. Vasan A Risk Score for Predicting Near-Term Incidence of Hypertension: The Framingham Heart Study Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2008; 148(2): 102 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ramirez-Lorca, A. Grilo, M. T. Martinez-Larrad, L. Manzano, F. J. Serrano-Hernando, F. J. Moron, V. Perez-Gonzalez, J. L. Gonzalez-Sanchez, J. Fresneda, R. Fernandez-Parrilla, et al. Sex and Body Mass Index Specific Regulation of Blood Pressure by CYP19A1 Gene Variants Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 884 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zintzaras, G. Kitsios, D. Kent, N. J. Camp, L. Atwood, P. N. Hopkins, and S. C. Hunt Genome-Wide Scans Meta-Analysis for Pulse Pressure Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): 557 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Fox, J. M. Massaro, U. Hoffmann, K. M. Pou, P. Maurovich-Horvat, C.-Y. Liu, R. S. Vasan, J. M. Murabito, J. B. Meigs, L. A. Cupples, et al. Abdominal Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Compartments: Association With Metabolic Risk Factors in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ingelsson, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan, C. J. O'Donnell, X. Yin, J. N. Hirschhorn, C. Newton-Cheh, J. A. Drake, S. L. Musone, N. L. Heard-Costa, et al. Heritability, Linkage, and Genetic Associations of Exercise Treadmill Test Responses Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2917 - 2924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Arnett, A. E. Baird, R. A. Barkley, C. T. Basson, E. Boerwinkle, S. K. Ganesh, D. M. Herrington, Y. Hong, C. Jaquish, D. A. McDermott, et al. Relevance of Genetics and Genomics for Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, the Stroke Council, and the Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2878 - 2901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dauchet, E. Kesse-Guyot, S. Czernichow, S. Bertrais, C. Estaquio, S. Peneau, A.-C. Vergnaud, S. Chat-Yung, K. Castetbon, V. Deschamps, et al. Dietary patterns and blood pressure change over 5-y follow-up in the SU.VI.MAX cohort Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1650 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Verrey WNK4, as thiazides, shuts off NaCl reabsorption to stimulate Na/K exchange Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1305 - 1308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Newton-Cheh, C.-Y. Guo, P. Gona, M. G. Larson, E. J. Benjamin, T. J. Wang, S. Kathiresan, C. J. O'Donnell, S. L. Musone, A. L. Camargo, et al. Clinical and Genetic Correlates of Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratio and Relations to Blood Pressure in a Community Sample Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 846 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yatsu, N. Mizuki, N. Hirawa, A. Oka, N. Itoh, T. Yamane, M. Ogawa, T. Shiwa, Y. Tabara, S. Ohno, et al. High-Resolution Mapping for Essential Hypertension Using Microsatellite Markers Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 446 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, J. C. Poole, F. A. Treiber, G. A. Harshfield, C. D. Hanevold, and H. Snieder Ethnic and Gender Differences in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Trajectories: Results From a 15-Year Longitudinal Study in Youth and Young Adults Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2780 - 2787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Murabito, C.-Y. Guo, C. S. Fox, and R. B. D'Agostino Heritability of the Ankle-Brachial Index: The Framingham Offspring Study Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2006; 164(10): 963 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. I. Rice, A. L. Jones, P. J. Grant, A. M. Carter, A. J. Turner, and N. M. Hooper Circulating Activities of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme, Its Homolog, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, and Neprilysin in a Family Study Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 914 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Guzman, B. Cormand, M. Ribases, D. Gonzalez-Nunez, A. Botey, and E. Poch Implication of Chromosome 18 in Hypertension by Sibling Pair and Association Analyses: Putative Involvement of the RKHD2 Gene Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 883 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Franceschini, J. W. MacCluer, H. H.H. Goring, S. A. Cole, K. M. Rose, L. Almasy, V. Diego, S. Laston, E. T. Lee, B. V. Howard, et al. A Quantitative Trait Loci-Specific Gene-by-Sex Interaction on Systolic Blood Pressure Among American Indians: The Strong Heart Family Study Hypertension, August 1, 2006; 48(2): 266 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|