| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2000;36:517.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Division of Nephrology, San Jorge General Hospital, Huesca (C.L.); Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona (N.V.); and Department of Cardiology, University Clinic and Vascular Pathophysiology Unit, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona (J.D.), Spain.
Correspondence to Dr Javier Díez, Unidad de Fisiopatología Vascular, Facultad de Medicina, C/Irunlarrea s/n, 31080 Pamplona, Spain. E-mail jadimar{at}unav.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: collagen hypertension, essential hypertrophy, left ventricular angiotensin antagonist albuminuria transforming growth factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transforming growth factor ß-1 (TGF-ß1) is a multifunctional cytokine with fibrogenic and hemodynamic properties.5 TGF-ß1 directly stimulates the synthesis of matrix molecules and blocks matrix degradation.6 In addition, TGF-ß1 may determine blood pressure levels via endothelin7 and/or the renin-angiotensin system.8 Li et al9 have shown that a positive correlation exists between circulating levels of TGF-ß1 protein and blood pressure in humans. On the other hand, upregulation of TGF-ß1 has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular10 and renal8 alterations in hypertensive patients.
The procollagen type I carboxy-terminal peptide (PIP), a 100-kDa peptide cleaved from procollagen type I during the synthesis of the fibril-forming collagen type I and released into the blood stream with a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1, can be measured to assess collagen type I synthesis.11 Similarly, the pyridoline cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide domain of collagen type I (CITP), a 12-kDa telopeptide resulting from the cleavage of collagen type I fibers by collagenase and released into the blood stream with a stoichiometry of 1:1, may be determined to assess collagen type I degradation.11 Determinations of serum PIP and CITP have been recently demonstrated to be useful markers of increased and depressed collagen type I synthesis and degradation, respectively, in spontaneously hypertensive rats12 13 and patients with essential hypertension.14 15
In an attempt to gain insight into the potential role of TGF-ß1 in development of microalbuminuria and LVH in hypertensives, we explored the hypothesis that TGF-ß1 hyperexpression and altered collagen type I metabolism are associated with these 2 alterations in patients with essential hypertension. In addition, we investigated whether the ability of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist losartan to correct microalbuminuria16 and reverse LVH17 in patients with essential hypertension is related to downregulation of TGF-ß1 and normalization of collagen type I metabolism.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects with conditions associated with alterations in serum levels of PIP and/or CITP (liver cirrhosis, osteoporosis, hyperthyroidism, multiple myeloma, osteolytic metastases, systemic glucocorticoid treatment, and renal insufficiency) were excluded after complete medical examinations.
All patients received losartan as treatment (50 mg once daily as a fixed dose) for 6 months. The therapeutic goal was to achieve systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of <140 and 90 mm Hg, respectively. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, each patient underwent another complete medical examination.
Clinical Studies
Mean arterial pressure was calculated from the
equation (SBP+2DBP)/3, where SBP and DBP represent
systolic and diastolic blood pressure,
respectively. Pulse pressure was the arithmetic difference between
averaged systolic blood pressure and diastolic
blood pressure values.
The general analytical parameters were measured by routine laboratory methods. Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) rate for 24-hour urine collection was measured by an immunonephelometric assay (Behring Institute; limit of detection, 0.1 mg/dL; interassay variation coefficient, 3.5%) on samples collected from 8 AM to 8 AM during 3 consecutive days. Microalbuminuria was defined as a UAE >30 and <300 mg/24 h. Renal clearance of creatinine was calculated as the product of urine flow rate and the urine creatinine concentration divided by the serum creatinine concentration.
Left ventricular mass was calculated from 2-dimensional, targeted M-mode recordings obtained in each patient, as previously described.14 15 Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was obtained by dividing left ventricular mass by body surface area. The presence of LVH was established when LVMI was >116 g/m2 for men and >104 g/m2 for women.19
Biochemical Determinations
Peripheral venous blood was obtained from each
subject, and the sera were isolated and stored at -70°C until
assayed for TGF-ß1. After activation of the
sera by acidification, the biologically active
TGF-ß1 protein concentration was determined
with the use of a solid-phase TGF-ß1specific
sandwich ELISA (R&D Systems) according to Khanna et al.20
The interassay and intra-assay variations for determining
TGF-ß1 were 8% and 6%, respectively. The
sensitivity (minimum level of detection of
TGF-ß1) was 5 pg/mL.
Blood samples to determine serum PIP and CITP were taken at the time of medical examination and stored at -40°C until manipulation. The 2 peptides were determined by specific radioimmunoassays with the use of specific antisera (Orion Diagnostica), as previously described.14 15 The interassay and intra-assay variations for determining PIP were 7% and 3%, respectively. The sensitivity was 0.5 µg PIP per liter. The interassay and intra-assay variations for measuring CITP were 8% and 6%, respectively. The sensitivity was 0.5 µg CITP per liter.
Blood samples for determination of angiotensin II were collected on ice in tubes containing EDTA and angiotensinase inhibitor (Buhlman Laboratories) and centrifuged at 4°C; plasma samples were frozen at -40°C until the assay was performed. Angiotensin II was determined by radioimmunoassay (Nichols Institute). The interassay and intra-assay variations for measuring angiotensin II were 5% and 4%, respectively. The sensitivity was 3.80 pg angiotensin II per milliliter.
Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as mean±SD. Differences among
normotensive subjects and hypertensives from groups A and B were tested
by a 1-way ANOVA once normality was demonstrated (Shapiro-Wilks test);
otherwise, a nonparametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) was used.
If significant differences (P<0.05) were obtained by ANOVA,
subsequent multiple comparison Scheffés test, or contrast
coefficient matrix test when variances were not homogeneous
(Levene test), was applied. In the same way, after the Kruskal-Wallis
test we used the Mann-Whitney U test to check differences
between 2 groups. Students t tests for paired and unpaired
data were used to examine the significance of differences in
hypertensives from group B after treatment. The correlation between
continuously distributed variables was tested by
univariate regression analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Biochemical Data
Serum concentration of TGF-ß1 was
increased (P<0.05) in group B of hypertensives (84±8
ng/mL) compared with group A of hypertensives (53±10 ng/mL) and
normotensives (48±12 ng/mL) (Figure 1).
No differences in serum TGF-ß1 were observed
between group A of hypertensives and normotensives (Figure 1).
Ten patients from group B exhibited values of
TGF-ß1 above the upper normal limit measured in
normotensives (71 ng/mL).
|
As shown in Figure 1, serum PIP concentration was higher (P<0.05) in group B of hypertensives (160±16 ng/mL) than in group A of hypertensives (117±20 ng/mL) and normotensives (107±29 ng/mL). No significant changes in serum CITP were observed among the 3 groups of studied subjects (Figure 1). Therefore, the ratio between PIP and CITP, an index of the degree of coupling between the synthesis and degradation of collagen type I,12 was increased (P<0.05) in group B of hypertensives (90±8) compared with group A of hypertensives (55±7) and normotensives (53±7).
Findings During Treatment
Clinical Data
The time course effects of treatment with losartan on
hemodynamic and clinical and hormonal
parameters are presented in Tables 2 and 3,
respectively. None of the hypertensives from group A developed
microalbuminuria or LVH during the treatment with
losartan (Table 3). At the end of the treatment period,
2 subgroups of hypertensives from group B were identified according to
the evolution of UAE and LVMI: those in which
microalbuminuria and LVH were corrected (responders; n=11)
and those in which these 2 alterations persisted (nonresponders; n=6).
Whereas a similar control of blood pressure was attained in the 2
subgroups (Table 2), the intensity of AT1
blockade, as assessed by the increase in circulating
angiotensin II, was higher (P<0.05) in
responders than in nonresponders (Table 3). Whereas UAE and LVMI
diminished to normal values (P<0.05) in the subgroup of
responders, they remained unchanged in the subgroup of nonresponders
(Table 3).
|
|
Biochemical Data
Figure 2 shows the time
course of changes induced by treatment with losartan in several
biochemical parameters in the 2 subgroups of hypertensives.
Whereas TGF-ß1 was unchanged in nonresponders,
it decreased progressively to reach normal values (P<0.05)
in responders. Similarly, PIP levels did not change in nonresponders,
but they diminished to reach normal values (P<0.05) in
responders. No significant changes in CITP were observed with treatment
in the 2 subgroups of patients. The PIP:CITP ratio measured at the end
of the treatment period was normal in responders (58±6) but remained
abnormally increased in nonresponders (87±9).
|
A direct correlation was found after treatment between percent changes in serum TGF-ß1 and percent changes in serum PIP (r=0.67, P<0.05) in responder patients from group B. No correlations between these 2 parameters were found in the other 2 groups of patients after treatment. No correlations were found among other parameters in this study.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overproduction of TGF-ß1 has been experimentally linked to the sequela of chronic hypertension, including LVH,21 vascular remodeling,22 and progressive renal disease.23 Although many of the biological actions of TGF-ß1 are mediated in an autocrine or paracrine fashion, data from transgenic mice have demonstrated that high circulating levels can mediate organ and tissue damage.24 Thus, our finding that an excess of circulating TGF-ß1 is associated with microalbuminuria and LVH in patients with essential hypertension adds clinical support to the notion that this cytokine can play a role in the pathophysiology of end-organ damage in a group (57%) of patients with essential hypertension.
Experimental7 8 and clinical9 evidence suggested a role for TGF-ß1 in the elevation of blood pressure. However, no differences in either mean arterial pressure or pulse pressure were found in this study between group A of hypertensives with normal TGF-ß1 levels and group B of hypertensives with exaggerated TGF-ß1 levels. Thus, a nonhemodynamic mechanism may be involved in the potential contribution of this growth factor to microalbuminuria and LVH in hypertension.
Our finding that the excess of TGF-ß1 is associated with an imbalance between increased PIP and normal CITP suggests that synthesis of collagen type I fibers is stimulated and its degradation inhibited in hypertensives from group B. Recently, we demonstrated in rats with spontaneous hypertension12 and in patients with essential hypertension25 that these biochemical alterations in collagen-derived serum peptides reflect closely the presence of myocardial fibrosis. It thus can be proposed that hypertensives from group B may present renal and cardiac fibrosis. Several arguments may support this proposal. First, TGF-ß1 has been found to increase mRNA levels for most of the extracellular matrix proteins, including preprocollagen type I, and to result in increased secretion of the protein (ie, procollagen type I).6 These effects are complemented by the ability of TGF-ß1 to interfere with proteolytic degradation of collagen fibers via reduction in synthesis and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases and increased synthesis of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases.6 Second, the presence of microalbuminuria in essential hypertensive patients has been interpreted as a marker of the early development of nephrosclerosis.26 27 28 29 Third, fibrous tissue accumulation is an integral feature of the adverse structural remodeling of cardiac tissue seen in hypertensive patients with LVH.30 31
A second finding of the present study is that losartan corrected microalbuminuria and LVH only in those hypertensives in whom the circulating levels of TGF-ß1 were progressively normalized during the treatment period. In contrast, both alterations persisted in those hypertensives in which TGF-ß1 levels remained unchanged during treatment with losartan. Because the antihypertensive efficacy of losartan was similar in the 2 subgroups of patients, it is tempting to speculate that the ability of the drug to diminish TGF-ß1 may be involved in its beneficial effects at the cardiac and renal levels. This is further supported by the observation that markers of collagen type I metabolism were normalized in those hypertensives in whom TGF-ß1 was normalized with treatment but remained altered in the remaining hypertensives. Furthermore, changes observed in TGF-ß1 with treatment correlated with changes in PIP only in responder patients.
Recent experimental8 and clinical32 studies have demonstrated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or AT1 antagonists may interfere with the synthesis and secretion of TGF-ß1. For instance, Campistol et al32 have reported that the circulating levels of TGF-ß1 decreased progressively and significantly in 14 transplant patients with chronic allograft nephropathy treated with losartan (50 mg) for 8 weeks. Since data exist that angiotensin II regulates the production of TGF-ß1 at different levels,8 33 it is likely that the mechanism by which losartan decreases serum levels of this factor is through interrupting the interaction of the octapeptide with AT1 receptors. In support of this possibility is our observation that the normalization of TGF-ß1 levels was attained in those hypertensives who exhibited the highest response to AT1 blockade (as assessed by the highest elevation in plasma angiotensin II) under treatment with losartan.
Some questions arise regarding the mechanisms responsible for the
existence of 2 patterns of response to losartan, in terms of
AT1 blockade and TGF-ß1
inhibition, in group B hypertensives. On one hand, the possibility
exists that, independently of the effect on blood pressure,
nonresponder patients may require doses of losartan >50 mg/d
or a follow-up >6 months to observe some impact on plasma
angiotensin II and TGF-ß1
concentrations. On the other hand, a polymorphism of the
AT1 receptor gene has been described in which
there is either an adenine (A) or cytosine (C) base at position
1166 in the 3' untranslated region of the gene.34
Recently, it has been reported that there is a relationship between the
AT1A1166
C
polymorphism and the humoral and renal responses to
losartan.35 Losartan decreased mean
arterial pressure and increased the glomerular
filtration rate in the AC/CC group but did not influence these
parameters in the AA group. Further studies are required to
determine whether the 2 patterns of responses to losartan here
reported are determined by the polymorphism of the
AT1 receptor gene.
In summary, we found an association between increased TGF-ß1, predominance of the synthesis over the degradation of collagen type I molecules, LVH, and microalbuminuria in approximately half of patients with essential hypertension. Further studies are required to evaluate whether the excess of TGF-ß1 may facilitate the development of cardiac and renal fibrosis in these patients. In addition, we reported that the efficient blockade of AT1 receptors with losartan is associated with inhibition of TGF-ß1, normalization of collagen type I metabolism, and reversal of LVH and microalbuminuria in a small fraction of hypertensive patients. The possibility that the ability of losartan to inhibit TGF-ß1 plays a role in its cardioreparative properties in some hypertensives deserves further investigation.
Received February 21, 2000; first decision March 9, 2000; accepted April 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Gonzalez, B. Lopez, S. Ravassa, J. Beaumont, T. Arias, N. Hermida, A. Zudaire, and J. Diez Biochemical markers of myocardial remodelling in hypertensive heart disease Cardiovasc Res, September 20, 2008; (2008) cvn235v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhu, Y. Liu, L. Wang, and Q. H. Meng Transforming growth factor-{beta}1 is associated with kidney damage in patients with essential hypertension: renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blocker Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2841 - 2846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kelly, A. J. Cox, R. M. Gow, Y. Zhang, B. E. Kemp, and R. E. Gilbert Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Mediates the Trophic Effects of Angiotensin II In Vivo Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Uemura, H. Ishiguro, N. Nakaigawa, Y. Nagashima, Y. Miyoshi, K. Fujinami, A. Sakaguchi, and Y. Kubota Angiotensin II receptor blocker shows antiproliferative activity in prostate cancer cells: A possibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitor of growth factor Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2003; 2(11): 1139 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Z. Dickson, J. Zagrobelny, C. C. Lin, M. A. Ritter, D. Snavely, D. Ramjit, S. Shahinfar, and M.-W. Lo Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antihypertensive Efficacy of Losartan in Combination with Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients with Renal Impairment J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2003; 43(6): 591 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Gonzalez, B Lopez, and J Diezl Myocardial fibrosis in arterial hypertension Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2002; 4(suppl_D): D18 - D22. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pedrinelli, G. Dell'Omo, G. Penno, and M. Mariani Non-diabetic microalbuminuria, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2001; 6(4): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lopez, A. Gonzalez, N. Varo, C. Laviades, R. Querejeta, and J. Diez Biochemical Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertensive Heart Disease Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1222 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lopez, R. Querejeta, N. Varo, A. Gonzalez, M. Larman, J. L. Martinez Ubago, and J. Diez Usefulness of Serum Carboxy-Terminal Propeptide of Procollagen Type I in Assessment of the Cardioreparative Ability of Antihypertensive Treatment in Hypertensive Patients Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |