(Hypertension. 2000;36:549.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Medicine (W.W., Y.Z., D.H.W.) and Pharmacology and Toxicology (J.R.B., G.F., D.H.W.), College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Correspondence to Donna H. Wang, MD, Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, B338 Clinical Center, East Lansing, MI 48824. E-mail donna.wang{at}ht.msu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Angiotensin II peptides hypertension, experimental
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is evidence showing that the renin-angiotensin system interacts with sensory nerves to modulate cardiovascular function.13 Sensory afferent nerves have cell bodies located in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and extend their processes to a variety of tissues including renal tubules, resistance arteries, and heart. It has been established that sensory afferent fibers release a variety of vasodilator neuropeptides, for example, calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) and substance P, in response to local chemical and mechanical stimuli.14 These neuropeptides have been implicated to play a role in blood pressure regulation. Despite the fact that plasma levels of CGRP in humans are increased in response to Ang II infusion,13 the role of sensory nerves in the development of hypertension induced by Ang II remains unknown. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that sensory nerves play a compensatory role in attenuating the pressor action of Ang II.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3
hours after surgery with rats fully awake and unrestricted.
Northern Blot Analysis
Total cellular RNA was isolated from DRG by the guanidine
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method. Approximately 40 µg
of total cellular RNA from DRG was isolated. Five micrograms of total
RNA for each sample was subjected to electrophoresis on denaturing
formaldehyde-agarose gel. The fractionated RNAs were transferred to
nylon membranes, and the blot was prehybridized for 5 hours at 42°C
in hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 5xDenhardts
solution, 5xSSC, 0.5% SDS, and 200 µg/mL denatured salmon sperm
DNA) and then hybridized with the
[
32P]-labeled CGRP probe for 18 to 20 hours
at 42°C. The membrane was then washed successively in 2x1x and
0.5xSSC containing 0.1% SDS at 60°C. Blots were exposed to XAR-5
x-ray film (Eastman Kodak). The probe was then removed from the
membrane and rehybridized with [
32P]-labeled
probe for 18s rRNA as control. After exposure to x-ray film,
autoradiographic signals were scanned with a laser
densitometer (Ultrascan XL Laser densitometer). Relative gene
expression was expressed as the ratio of CGRP mRNA to 18s rRNA.
Water Intake, Urine Volume, and Urinary Sodium and Potassium
Concentrations
Water intake and urine excretions were determined in each of 4
groups by the use of metabolic cages. These
parameters were measured 1 day before the animals were
killed. Urinary sodium and potassium concentrations were determined
with Nova CRT Electrolyte 16+ Analyzer (Nova Biochemical
Corp).
Statistical Analysis
Values are given as mean±SEM. Differences among groups were
determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison
test and paired t test.21 Differences
were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subpressor infusion of Ang II for 2 weeks led to an increase in the level of CGRP mRNA in DRG (CON-AII, 1.33±0.05, n=5) when compared with that in the control rats (CON, 0.93±0.03, n=5, P<0.05), suggesting that hypertension induced by subpressor infusion of Ang II stimulates the synthesis or decreases the degradation of CGRP mRNA in DRG.
Twenty-fourhour urine volume to water intake is shown in Figure 1. The ratio was significantly lower in CAP-AII than in CON-AII, CAP, and CON rats (P<0.05). Likewise, 24-hour urinary sodium excretion (Figure 2) was significantly lower in CAP-AII than in CON-AII, CAP, and CON rats (P<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (Figure 3) among 4 groups (P>0.05). These results indicate that sensory denervation plus subpressor Ang II infusion impairs urinary and sodium excretions.
|
|
|
MAP (Figure 4) was significantly elevated in both Ang IIinfused rats compared with nonAng IIinfused rats, and it was higher in CAP-AII than in CON-AII rats (P<0.05). These results show that sensory denervation exacerbates the development of hypertension induced by subpressor infusion of Ang II.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously demonstrated that neonatal treatment with capsaicin results in a remarkable decrease (6- to 7-fold) in CGRP levels in the DRG and causes a normal rat to respond to a salt load with a significant and sustained rise in blood pressure.17 Furthermore, we have shown that blockade of the type I Ang II receptor (AT1) with losartan prevents the development of hypertension induced by sensory denervation and sodium loading.18 These studies suggest that sensory denervation activates either the local or circulating renin-angiotensin system that plays a role in the development of salt-sensitive hypertension induced by sensory denervation. On the other hand, the present study indicates that subpressor infusion of Ang II increases the synthesis of sensory neurotransmitter CGRP that may act in response to increased Ang II or blood pressure per se. Given the fact that sensory denervation enhanced the development of hypertension induced by Ang II infusion, the increase in CGRP synthesis appears to be a compensatory response to attenuate the increase in blood pressure induced by Ang II. Taken together, our previous and present studies indicate a close interaction between the renin-angiotensin system and sensory nervous system to modulate blood pressure and cardiovascular function.
It is well known that salt and water balance is unchanged in experimental animals treated with small or subpressor doses of Ang II.10 11 22 Our findings that urinary and sodium excretion is not altered by subpressor infusion of Ang II, regardless of increased blood pressure, support these results. In contrast to the findings in these rats that receive Ang II only, sensory denervation leads to disturbed renal excretory function in subpressor Ang IIinfused rats. These facts indicate that normal sensory innervation preserves the excretory function of the kidney in hypertension induced by subpressor infusion of Ang II. These data are consistent with the results showing that renal nerves promote sodium excretion in hypertension induced by pathophysiological infusion of Ang II23 and provide a rationale for future investigation of sensory neural control of the renal function in physiological and pathophysiological conditions.
The mechanisms by which sensory denervation impairs the renal excretory function in Ang IIinfused rats are unknown. However, several possibilities exist: (1) sensory denervation results in decreased synthesis and release of sensory neurotransmitters that are very potent vasodilators and diuretic and natriuretic factors that act as depressors; (2) sensory denervation activates epithelial sodium channels to increase reabsorption of sodium from renal tubules and distal colon (our unpublished observations support this possibility); and (3) altered sensory feedback from the kidney to the brain causes generalized increase in sympathetic discharge, promoting vasoconstriction and sodium and water retention.24 All of these actions may provoke the unbalance of the renal function and render the rats responsive to Ang II infusion with decreased urinary and sodium excretion.
In conclusion, we have shown that neonatal degeneration of capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves increases the Ang II initiated hypertension. These results indicate that activation of sensory nerves, either by Ang II or by other hormonal or hemodynamic factors, plays a compensatory role in promoting urine and sodium excretion and attenuating elevated blood pressure initiated by Ang II. Future investigation that elucidates molecular mechanisms responsible for activation or inhibition of the sensory nervous system may provide insights into the pathogenesis of hypertension and hypertension-induced organ damage.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 14, 2000; first decision May 1, 2000; accepted May 5, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Hall JE, Guyton AC, Salgado HC, McCaa RE, Balfe JW.
Renal hemodynamics in acute and chronic
angiotensin II hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1978;235:F174F179.
3.
Brown JJ, Casals-Stenzel J, Cumming AM, Davies DL,
Fraser R, Lever AF, Morton JJ, Semple PF, Tree M, Robertson JI.
Angiotensin II, aldosterone and
arterial pressure: a quantitative approach.
Hypertension. 1979;1:159179.
4. Robertson JI, Morton JJ, Tillman DM, Lever AF. The pathophysiology of renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 1986;4(suppl 4):S95S103.
5. Cox BF, Bishop VS. Neural and humoral mechanisms of angiotensin-dependent hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1991;H1284H1291.
6.
Luft FC, Wilcox DJ, Unger T, Kuhn R, Demmer G,
Rohmeiss P, Ganten D, Sterzel RB. Angiotensin-induced
hypertension in the rat: sympathetic nerve activity and
prostaglandins. Hypertension. 1989;14:396403.
7.
Hall JE. Control of sodium excretion by
angiotensin II: intrarenal mechanisms and blood pressure
regulation. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:R960R972.
8. Diz DI, Baer PG, Nasjletti A. Angiotensin II-induced hypertension in the rat: effects on the plasma concentration, renal excretion, and tissue release of prostaglandins. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:466477.
9.
Lachance D, Garcia R. Atrial natriuretic
factor release by angiotensin II in the conscious rat.
Hypertension. 1988;11:502508.
10. Dickinson CJ, Yu R. Mechanism involved in the progressive pressor response to very small amounts of angiotensin II in conscious rabbits. Circ Res. 1967;21(suppl II):II-157-II-163.
11.
Brown JJ, Casals-Stenzel J, Gofford S, Lever AF, Morton
JJ. Comparison of fast and slow pressor effects of
angiotensin II in the conscious rat. Am J
Physiol. 1981;241:H381H388.
12.
Bean BL, Brown JJ, Casals-Stenzel J, Fraser R, Lever
AF, Millar JA, Morton JJ, Petch B, Riegger AJ, Robertson JI, Tree M.
The relation of arterial pressure and plasma
angiotensin II concentration: a change produced by
prolonged infusion of angiotensin II in the conscious dog.
Circ Res. 1979;44:452458.
13. Portaluppi F, Vergnani L, Margutti A, Ambrosio MR, Bondanelli M, Trasforini G, Rossi R, Degli Uberti EC. Modulatory effect of the renin-angiotensin system on the plasma levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:816820.[Abstract]
14. Maggi CA, Meli A. The sensor-efferent function of capsaicin-sensitive neurons. Gen Pharmacol. 1988;19:143.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Gamse R. Capsaicin and nociception in the rat and mouse: possible role of substance P. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1982;320:205216.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Holzer-Petsche U, Lembeck F. Systemic capsaicin treatment impairs the micturition reflex in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1984;83:935941.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Wang DH, Li JP, Qiu JX. Salt-sensitive hypertension
induced by sensory denervation: introduction of a new model.
Hypertension. 1998;32:649653.
18. Wang DH, Li JP. Antihypertensive mechanisms underlying a novel salt-sensitive hypertensive model induced by sensory denervation. Hypertension. 1999;33(part 2):499503.
19. Cassis L, Mashall DE, Fettinger MJ, Rosenbluth B, Lodder RA. Mechanisms contributing to angiotensin II regulation of body weight. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:E867E876.
20. Qiu JX, Wang DH. Biphasic regulation of vascular angiotensin receptors in hypertension. FASEB J. 1998;12:A2. Abstract.
21. Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Vari RC, Zinn S, Verburg RM, Freeman RH. Renal nerves
and the pathogenesis of angiotensin-induced hypertension.
Hypertension. 1987;9:345349.
23. Lohmeier TE, Hildebrandt DA. Renal nerves promote sodium excretion in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1998;31(part2):429434.
24. Wyss JM, Oparil S, Sripairojthikoon W. Neuronal control of the kidney: contribution to hypertension. Can J Physiol Pharmacol.. 1992;70:759770.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Yusof, K. Kamada, F. Spencer Gaskin, and R. J. Korthuis Angiotensin II mediates postischemic leukocyte-endothelial interactions: role of calcitonin gene-related peptide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H3032 - H3037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |