(Hypertension. 2000;36:1013.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
Consistency of Hemodynamic Responses to Cold Stress in Adolescents
From the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis.
Correspondence to Bruce S. Alpert, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee–Memphis, 777 Washington Ave, Suite 215, Memphis, TN 38105. E-mail rkelsey{at}utmem.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract—Laboratory research on hypertension often is performed with cold stress to elicit vasoconstriction and increases in blood pressure. Several studies have shown that cardiovascular responses to the cold pressor test predict the development of hypertension. We extended this research by comparing cardiovascular responses to a traditional forehead cold pressor test and a naturalistic whole-body cold exposure. We evaluated blood pressure and impedance cardiographic measures of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance in healthy black (n=69) and white (n=47) adolescents (mean age, 14.7 years) during forehead cold pressor (3°C to 4°C) and passive whole-body exposure to a cold chamber (8°C to 10°C). Both tasks elicited increases in vascular resistance and blood pressure, but forehead cold elicited an increase in cardiac output, whereas whole-body cold elicited a decrease in cardiac output (P<0.05). Consistent with previous research, there was a tendency toward greater vasoconstrictive reactivity to cold stress in blacks than in whites, particularly during whole-body cold exposure (P<0.05). Cardiovascular reactivity correlated significantly between tasks, but substantial intertask consistency occurred only for cardiac and vascular reactivity in male subjects (r>0.30) but not in female subjects (r<0.15). These gender differences might reflect diminished adrenergic receptor function in female subjects. We conclude that whole-body cold exposure offers a viable, relatively naturalistic alternative to traditional cold pressor tests for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity.
Key Words: stress • vasoconstriction • cardiac output • blood pressure • hemodynamics • adolescents
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Cold stress is often used to elicit
-adrenergic
vasoconstriction and pressor responses (ie, blood pressure [BP]
increases) in laboratory research on hypertension.1 2 3 4 5 The
most commonly used cold stressor is some variation of the cold pressor
test, which involves the immersion of a limb in ice water or the
placement of a bag of ice water on the forehead.1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A
number of studies have shown that cardiovascular
responses to the cold pressor test predict future resting BP and the
development of hypertension.10 11 12 Furthermore, studies of
both adults and children indicate that blacks, who are at increased
risk for early hypertension development,13 14 exhibit
greater vascular reactivity during limb and forehead cold pressor tasks
relative to whites.15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Traditional laboratory cold pressor tasks typically involve limited
regional body surface exposure to very cold and often painful ice water
slurries (
4°C),6 7 8 9 so it is not clear whether the
cardiovascular effects of such tasks can be generalized
to more naturalistic environmental cold exposure (CE). However, in a
recent study of adolescents,3 we demonstrated that
whole-body CE (8°C to 10°C) elicited increases in total
peripheral vascular resistance and BP similar to those
elicited by traditional cold pressor tasks and that cardiac and
vascular responses to whole-body CE were greater in blacks than in
whites. This study extends this research by providing a direct
evaluation of the consistency of cardiac and vascular
reactivity during forehead cold pressor and whole-body CE.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Normotensive male (n=51; 32 black and 19 white) and female (n=65; 37 black and 28 white) adolescents (mean age, 14.7±1.6 years) were recruited from the Memphis, Tennessee, area for a study on early markers of hypertension. Children identified as having significant medical conditions or taking medications that would affect BP responses were excluded from the study. Informed consent and assent were obtained from the adolescent and the parent or legal guardian. The University of Tennessee Institutional Review Board approved the protocol, and all procedures conformed to institutional guidelines. Information on the date of last menses was collected from female subjects, but no attempt was made to control for menstrual cycle phase. Each subject received $60 for participating.
Cardiovascular Measures
Systolic BP (SBP, mm Hg) and diastolic
BP (DBP, mm Hg) were measured during each rest and task period
with a SunTech automated BP monitor (model 4240, SunTech Medical
Instruments, Inc) with a cuff appropriate to the subject’s arm size.
This BP monitor is an auscultatory device that uses phase 5 Korotkoff
sounds to determine DBP and ECG R-wave gating to enhance measurement
accuracy. Mean arterial pressure (MAP, mm Hg) was
calculated as (1/3xSBP)+(2/3xDBP). Cardiac output (CO, L/min) was
measured with a Minnesota impedance cardiograph (model 304B,
Instrumentation for Medicine, Inc) and a Tetrapolar band-electrode
system according to established guidelines.22 Impedance
cardiographic data were acquired and scored with commercial software
(COP 4.0, Bio-Impedance Technology, Inc). Total peripheral
resistance (TPR, dyne ·
s/cm5) was derived from concurrent measures of CO
and BP by the formula TPR=(MAP/CO)x80.
Cold Stress
The cold pressor (CP) task occurred in the Pediatric Clinical
Research Center (P-CRC). Subjects sat upright in a comfortable chair
while the experimenter applied a plastic bag containing crushed ice and
water (3°C to 4°C) to their forehead for 3
minutes.6 8 9 15 17 19 20
A walk-in refrigerated chamber located in a laboratory of the Adult Clinical Research Center (A-CRC) served as the whole-body CE stimulus. A refrigerated ventilation system maintained the cold chamber at a constant temperature of 8°C to 10°C (85% to 95% humidity). Subjects sat upright in a comfortable chair in the cold chamber for 10 minutes. The temperature and exposure duration for CE were based on previous studies of healthy children and children with chronic diseases during rest and strenuous exercise in ambient temperatures as low as 5°C.23 24 Subjects were continuously observed through large observation windows during CE.
Procedure
The laboratory sessions were conducted in the morning 1 to 2
hours after subjects consumed their normal breakfast. Informed consent
and assent were obtained in the cardiovascular
laboratory of the P-CRC, which was maintained at a temperature of
22°C. Subjects then removed their shoes, shirt, and other upper outer
garments and changed into a hospital gown. They were not required to
remove lower garments. The experimenter measured the height and weight
of the subject and then connected the subject to the automated BP
monitor, ECG, and impedance cardiograph. Subjects sat quietly in a
comfortable chair for a 20-minute baseline rest period before
performing the 3-minute CP task. Cardiovascular data
were recorded during the last 3 minutes of the baseline rest period
and during each minute of CP.
After completing the laboratory procedures in the P-CRC, subjects were taken by wheelchair to the laboratory in the A-CRC that housed the cold chamber. Subjects were connected to identical cardiovascular recording devices at the A-CRC and then sat quietly in a euthermic laboratory area (22°C) for another 20-minute baseline rest period before performing the 10-minute CE task. Cardiovascular data were recorded during the last 3 minutes of the baseline rest period and during minutes 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, and 10 of CE. After CE, subjects returned to the euthermic laboratory area. After completion of all laboratory procedures, the cardiovascular recording devices were removed and any remaining questions by the subject and/or parent were answered. Once the subjects stated that they were again comfortable, they were escorted back to the P-CRC to complete the remainder of the study protocol.
Data Reduction and Analysis
Data from the last 3 minutes of each baseline rest period were
averaged to compute baseline means for CO, TPR, and MAP. Similarly,
data from the 3 minutes of CP and the 6 sampled minutes of CE were
averaged to compute task means. Cardiovascular
reactivity was evaluated by subtracting the means for the appropriate
baseline rest period from the means for each task period. Baseline
cardiovascular function was evaluated in a 2 (race)x2
(gender)x2 (period) multivariate ANOVA, whereas
cardiovascular reactivity during CP and CE was
analyzed in a 2 (race)x2 (gender)x2 (task)
multivariate ANOVA. The inclusion of age and body mass
index (BMI, kg/m2) as covariates in these
analyses did not alter the results, so only unadjusted results
are reported.
Significant multivariate effects were followed by
univariate and stepdown F tests. Stepdown
F tests use hierarchical ANCOVA techniques to determine the
relative contribution of each cardiovascular measure to
a multivariate effect after controlling for prior
measures in the analysis.25 26 The a
priori ordering of the measures for the stepdown tests was based on
presumed autonomic influences on cardiovascular
function: (a) a significant effect for CO, assessed first in a
univariate ANOVA, presumably reflects parasympathetic and
ß-adrenergic sympathetic effects on the heart; (b) a significant
effect for TPR, assessed second in a univariate ANCOVA with
CO as the covariate, presumably reflects residual -adrenergic
effects on the vasculature; (c) a significant effect for MAP, assessed
last in a univariate ANCOVA with both CO and TPR as
covariates, probably reflects nonautonomic influences on BP. A value of
P<0.05 (2-tailed) was considered significant for these
analyses.
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were computed to assess the consistency of CO, TPR, and MAP reactivity between CP and CE. These correlations were computed for the total sample and separately by race and gender. A value of P<0.05 (1-tailed) was considered significant for these analyses.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Baseline
Table 1 presents age, BMI, and baseline cardiovascular data for each group. There were no significant racial differences in any of these measures. There were no significant gender differences in age or BMI, but baseline MAP was higher overall in male subjects than in female subjects (P<0.01). Moreover, the decrease in CO and the increase in TPR over baseline periods (both P<0.001) were greater in male subjects than in female subjects (both P<0.025).
|
Cold Stress
Magnitude of Cardiovascular Reactivity
Table 2 presents mean CO, TPR,
and MAP reactivity during CP and CE for each group. Both stressors
elicited significant increases in TPR and MAP across groups (both
P<0.001), but they had opposite effects on CO reactivity;
CP elicited an increase in CO (P<0.001), whereas CE
elicited a slight decrease in CO (P<0.05). A significant
multivariate task effect (P<0.0005)
indicated that the differential impact of CP versus CE extended to all
3 measures (all univariate F[1, 112] >5.9,
P<0.02). For illustrative purposes, the
Figure depicts the
cardiovascular responses to CP and CE in terms of
percent change from baseline. As the Figure indicates, CE elicited the
greatest increase in TPR, whereas CP elicited the greatest
increases in CO and MAP. Stepdown F tests
indicated that the task difference in CO reactivity (stepdown
F[1, 112]=18.14, P<0.0005) largely accounted
for the task difference in TPR reactivity (stepdown F[1,
111] <1, P=NS) but that neither component completely
accounted for the difference in MAP reactivity between tasks (stepdown
F[1, 110]=16.56, P<0.0005).
|
|
There were no significant differences in cardiovascular reactivity as a function of gender. Although the multivariate test of racial differences was not significant (P<0.15), stepdown F tests suggested a tendency toward greater overall TPR reactivity in blacks (CO-adjusted M=143 dyne · s/cm5) than in whites (CO-adjusted M=94 dyne · s/cm5), (F[1, 111]=4.16, P<0.05). Similarly, the multivariate race by task interaction fell short of significance (P<0.10), but stepdown F tests suggested that the differential impact of CP versus CE on CO reactivity was greater in blacks than in whites (F[1, 112]=4.74, P<0.05).
Consistency of Cardiovascular Reactivity
Table 3 presents the
correlations between cardiovascular responses to CP and
CE for the total sample and separately by race and gender. The
correlations between CP and CE were significant albeit modest for all 3
measures in the total sample. The correlations for blacks and whites
were similar to each other and to those for the total sample. In
contrast, the correlations for male subjects and female subjects
differed markedly, with significant correlations emerging for CO and
TPR reactivity in male subjects (both r>0.30) but not in
female subjects.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Both CP and CE elicited significant increases in vascular resistance and BP, as expected, but they elicited divergent cardiac responses. Convergent increases in TPR and CO contributed to the increase in BP during CP, whereas an increase in TPR contributed to the increase in BP during CE despite a drop in CO. As a result, the increase in BP during CP exceeded that during CE despite a larger increase in vascular resistance during CE. Stepdown tests indicated that the task difference in CO reactivity accounted for the task difference in TPR reactivity, suggesting that ß-adrenergic vasodilation partially masked
-adrenergic vasoconstriction during
CP.3 5 7 Furthermore, consistent with previous
research,15 17 19 20 there was a tendency toward greater
vasoconstrictive reactivity to cold stress in blacks
than in whites, particularly during CE. This racial difference in TPR
reactivity emerged only after controlling for CO reactivity in stepdown
tests, suggesting that ß-adrenergic vasodilation masked racial
differences in -adrenergic vasoconstriction.3
Although CP and CE elicited opposite changes in CO, these changes were
relatively small and were near the limits of measurement error for the
impedance cardiography system used in this study.5 22 Most
previous studies have reported either no change or a decrease in CO
during forehead CP,9 19 20 but some studies have observed
increases in CO during limb CP tests.1 5 The sources of
differences in cardiovascular reactivity to various
types of regional and whole-body cold stress remain unclear, but likely
candidates include variations in the intensity and duration of cold
stress,3 6 9 the amount and location of the exposed skin
surface,3 painfulness of the cold
stimulus,7 8 body posture during
stimulation,6 9 and proximity of the experimenter to the
subject during stress.27 28 These factors might
differentially influence various mechanisms that mediate increases in
BP, including ß-adrenergic and -adrenergic vasoactive mechanisms,
as well as nonadrenergic vasoactive mechanisms
involving substances such as angiotensin II and
endothelin-1.29 30 31 Moreover, stepdown tests on the
present data suggest that factors other than CO and TPR may
contribute to variations in BP reactivity to different types of cold
stress.
There was a significant decrease in CO and a significant increase in TPR but no significant change in MAP across baseline rest periods. Logistical considerations precluded random counterbalanced ordering of CP and CE in this study, so we cannot determine whether these baseline shifts resulted from carryover effects of prior stress, differences in experimental setting (P-CRC versus A-CRC), or general effects of time in the laboratory. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac performance tends to decrease and vascular resistance tends to increase over baseline periods regardless of prior exposure to stress and that these baseline shifts have little impact on subsequent cardiovascular reactivity to stress.25 28 However, the baseline shifts in the present study were greater than in those studies. Nevertheless, baseline CO and TPR did not correlate significantly with CO and TPR reactivity for either stressor in the present study, and controlling for baseline levels in covariance analyses did not alter the results for CO and TPR reactivity to stress. Thus, CO and TPR responses to cold stress were apparently independent of baseline levels. The case was different for MAP reactivity, which correlated inversely with baseline MAP for both stressors (r=-0.28 for CP and r=-0.61 for CE, both P<0.002). Thus, elevations in MAP during baseline might have constrained increases in MAP during cold stress.
Despite differences in the intensity and extent of cold stress during CP and CE and differences in the cardiovascular profiles preceding and during these different stressors, the cardiovascular responses to these two tasks correlated significantly. The magnitudes of the intertask correlations were similar for blacks and whites, although there was some attenuation of statistical power because of the reduction in sample size for analyses by race. In contrast, the intertask correlations for CO and TPR reactivity were substantially different for male subjects and female subjects, with significant correlations emerging only for male subjects. These gender differences might reflect variations in adrenergic receptor function between male subjects and female subjects, because previous studies suggest that peripheral vascular adrenergic receptor function and the heritability of vascular reactivity are diminished in female subjects.32 33 Gender differences in hormonal factors, including hormonal variations over the menstrual cycle in female subjects, might contribute to gender differences in adrenergic receptor function and the intertask consistency of cardiovascular responses.32
In conclusion, forehead CP and whole-body CE evoked similar vasoconstrictive and pressor reactions but opposite cardiac reactions. Cardiovascular reactivity correlated significantly between tasks, but substantial intertask consistency occurred only for CO and TPR reactivity in male subjects. The cold stress involved in whole-body CE was less intensive but more extensive than that involved in traditional limb and forehead CP tests. Thus, whole-body CE is a relatively naturalistic form of environmental cold stress that offers a viable alternative to traditional CP tests for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity, especially when the avoidance of painful stimuli is desirable, as in evaluations of children.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant HL-35788 and by a General Clinical Research Center grant from the National Institutes of Health (5-M01RR-00211-98) awarded to the University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Received April 13, 2000; first decision May 8, 2000; accepted June 9, 2000.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Allen MT, Obrist PA, Sherwood A, Crowell MD. Evaluation of myocardial and peripheral vascular responses during reaction time, mental arithmetic, and cold pressor tasks. Psychophysiology. 1987;24:648–656.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kanayama N, Khatun S, Belayet H, She L, Terao T. Chronic local cold stress to the soles induces hypertension in rats. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:1124–1129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Kelsey RM, Alpert BS, Patterson SM, Barnard M. Racial
differences in hemodynamic responses to environmental
thermal stress among adolescents. Circulation. 2000;101:2284–2289.
4.
LeBlanc J, Dulac S, Cote J, Girard B. Autonomic
nervous system and adaptation to cold in man. J Appl
Physiol. 1975;39:181–186.
5. Sherwood A, Allen MT, Obrist PA, Langer AW. Evaluation of beta-adrenergic influences on cardiovascular and metabolic adjustments to physical and psychological stress. Psychophysiology. 1986;23:89–104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Durel LA, Kus LA, Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Llabre MM, Spitzer S, Saab PG, Efland J, Williams R, Schneiderman N. Patterns and stability of cardiovascular responses to variations of the cold pressor test. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:39–46.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Lovallo W. The cold pressor test and autonomic function: a review and integration. Psychophysiology. 1975;12:268–282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Peckerman A, Saab PG, McCabe PM, Skyler JS, Winters RW, Llabre MM, Schneiderman N. Blood pressure reactivity and perception of pain during the forehead cold pressor test. Psychophysiology. 1991;28:485–495.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Saab PG, Llabre MM, Hurwitz BE, Schneiderman N, Wohlgemuth W, Durel LA, Massie C, Nagel J. The cold pressor test: vascular and myocardial response patterns and their stability. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:366–373.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Menkes MS, Matthews KA, Krantz DS, Lundberg V, Mead LA,
Qaqish B, Liang KY, Thomas CB, Pearson TA.
Cardiovascular reactivity to the cold pressor test as a
predictor of hypertension. Hypertension. 1989;14:524–530.
11.
Wood DL, Sheps SG, Elveback LR, Schirger A. Cold
pressor test as a predictor of hypertension. Hypertension. 1984;6:301–306.
12.
Kasagi F, Akahoshi M, Shimaoka K. Relation between cold
pressor test and development of hypertension based on 28-year
follow-up. Hypertension. 1995;25:71–76.
13. He J, Whelton PK. Epidemiology and prevention of hypertension. Med Clin North Am. 1997;81:1077–1097.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Wolz M, Cutler J, Roccella EJ, Rohde F, Thom T, Burt V. Statement from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program: prevalence of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:103–104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Anderson NB, Lane JD, Muranaka M, Williams RB,
Houseworth SJ. Racial differences in blood pressure and forearm
vascular responses to the cold face stimulus. Psychosom Med. 1988;50:57–63.
16.
Calhoun DA, Mutinga ML, Collins AS, Wyss JM, Oparil S.
Normotensive blacks have heightened sympathetic response to cold
pressor test. Hypertension. 1993;22:801–805.
17. Dysart JM, Treiber FA, Pfieger K, Davis H, Strong WB. Ethnic differences in the myocardial and vascular reactivity to stress in normotensive girls. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:15–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. McAdoo WG, Weinberger MH, Miller JZ, Fineberg NS, Grim CE. Race and gender influence hemodynamic responses to psychological and physical stimuli. J Hypertens. 1990;8:961–967.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Sherwood A, May CW, Siegel WC, Blumenthal JA. Ethnic differences in hemodynamic responses to stress in hypertensive men and women. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:552–557.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Treiber FA, Musante L, Barden DS, Arensman F, Strong
WB, Levy M, Nunn S. Racial differences in hemodynamic
responses to cold face stimulus in children and adults. Psychosom
Med. 1990;52:286–296.
21.
Voors AW, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Racial contrasts in
cardiovascular response tests for children from a total
community. Hypertension. 1980;2:686–694.
22. Sherwood A, Allen MT, Fahrenberg J, Kelsey RM, Lovallo WR, van Doornen LJP. Committee report: methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology. 1990;27:1–23.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Alpert BS, Flood NB, Strong WB, Dover EV, DuRant RH, Martin AM, Booker DL. Responses to ergometer exercise in a healthy biracial population of children. J Pediatr. 1982;101:538–545.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bar-Or O, Blimkie CJ, Hay HA. Voluntary dehydration and heat tolerance in cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1992;339:696–699.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kelsey RM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Leitten CL, Schneider TR, Wiens S. Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: effects of prior task exposure. Psychophysiology. 1999;36:818–831.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1996.
27.
Kamarck TW, Manuck SB, Jennings JR. Social support
reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological
challenge: a laboratory model. Psychosom Med. 1990;52:42–58.
28. Kelsey RM, Blascovich J, Leitten CL, Schneider TR, Tomaka J, Wiens S. Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: moderating effects of evaluative observation. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:748–756.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Fyhrquist F, Saijonmaa O, Metsarinne K, Tikkanen I, Rosenlof K, Tikkanen T. Raised plasma endothelin-I concentration following cold pressor test. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;169:217–221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Gasic S, Ratheiser K, Wagner O, Nowotny P, Vierhapper H, Waldhausl W. Alterations in angiotensin II release and vascular reactivity in hypertensive men: a pilot study. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:1055–1062.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Treiber FA, Jackson RW, Davis H, Pollock JS, Kapuku G,
Mensah GA, Pollock DM. Racial differences in endothelin-1 at rest and
in response to acute stress in adolescent males.
Hypertension.. 2000;35:722–725.
32.
Freedman RR, Sabharwal SC, Desai N. Sex differences in
peripheral vascular adrenergic receptors. Circ
Res. 1987;61:581–585.
33. Ditto B. Familial influences on heart rate, blood pressure, and self-report anxiety responses to stress: results from 100 twin pairs. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:635–645.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. G. Edwards, M. S. Roy, and R. Y. Prasad Wave reflection augments central systolic and pulse pressures during facial cooling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2535 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||