| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2000;36:941.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
Transient Hypertension Directly Impairs Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation of the Human Microvasculature
From the Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Dr Julio A. Panza, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1650, Bldg 10, Room 7B-15, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail panzaj{at}nih.gov
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract—Hypertension is associated with decreased endothelium-dependent vasodilation. However, whether endothelial dysfunction is a cause or a consequence of elevated blood pressure is unknown. Therefore, to determine whether hypertension can directly induce endothelial dysfunction, we investigated the effect of increases in intra-arterial pressure on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the human microvasculature. Small arteries (internal diameter 202±75 µm) were isolated from gluteal fat biopsies in 12 healthy normotensive subjects (8 men and 4 women; age, 46±10 years). Arteries were cannulated and perfused in chambers oxygenated at 37°C. Endothelium-dependent and -independent responses to acetylcholine (Ach; 10-9 to 10-4 mol/L) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 10-9 to 10-4 mol/L), respectively, were obtained after incubating the vessel with incremental intravascular pressures of 50, 80, and 120 mm Hg for 60 minutes each. The response to Ach was also obtained in different arteries after 3 consecutive incubation periods at 50 mm Hg. Arterial internal diameter was measured directly from amplified digital images. A significant reduction in the vasodilator response to Ach was observed with increases in intravascular pressure (mean vasodilation, 62%, 49%, and 26% at 50, 80, and 120 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001). In contrast, the response to SNP showed a nonsignificant trend toward greater vasodilation with increases in pressure (mean vasodilation, 40%, 52%, and 57% at 50, 80, and 120 mm Hg, respectively; P=0.10). There was no difference in the consecutive dose-response curves to Ach obtained at the same intravascular pressure (mean vasodilation: 48%, 46%, and 49%; P=0.61). Transient increases in intravascular pressure significantly depress endothelium-dependent vasodilation in human resistance arteries. These findings suggest that elevated blood pressure per se may cause endothelial dysfunction in humans and have implications for the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension.
Key Words: endothelium • hypertension, essential • blood vessels
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Several previous studies have demonstrated that essential hypertension is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation.1 2 3 However, whether this is a primary or secondary abnormality is unknown. Certain previous investigations have suggested that endothelial dysfunction is a primary defect in essential hypertension, present even before the clinical documentation of elevated blood pressure. Thus, normotensive offspring of hypertensive patients were found to have depressed endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared with normotensive offspring of normotensive parents.4 Furthermore, the same authors have reported that the bioactivity of nitric oxide (NO) may be reduced in normotensive individuals with a family history of hypertension.5
On the other hand, certain observations suggest that endothelial dysfunction may occur as a consequence rather than a cause of elevated blood pressure. In particular, several animal models of induced hypertension, including suprarenal coarctation of the abdominal aorta in rabbits,6 salt-induced hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats,7 and pressure increases in cat cerebral8 and dog coronary arteries,9 have all shown a selective impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation after elevations in blood pressure.
Because essential hypertension is a heterogeneous and probably multifactorial process, the possibility that endothelial dysfunction may develop as a consequence of elevated blood pressure may have important implications. In particular, the induction of endothelial dysfunction by hypertension may a create a vicious cycle that contributes to increased vascular resistance and enhanced propensity to the development of atherosclerosis regardless of the initial cause of the hypertensive process. However, whether arterial hypertension can directly induce endothelial dysfunction in humans has not been determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of increases in intra-arterial pressure on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of small arteries obtained from normotensive individuals.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Study Subjects
Twelve healthy subjects (8 men and 4 women) were recruited for this study. Mean age was 46±10 years. Each subject was screened by clinical history, physical examination, ECG, chest radiograph, and routine chemical analyses. None had evidence of present or past hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or any other systemic condition. Their blood pressure measurements and chemistry results at the time of screening are included in the Table.
|
None of the study participants was taking any medication at the time of the study. In particular, they were asked to refrain from vitamin supplements for 4 weeks, aspirin for 2 weeks, and smoking and caffeine for at least 24 hours before the study.
The study protocol was approved by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave written informed consent.
Subcutaneous Biopsies and In Vitro Procedures
In each subject, biopsy specimens of skin and subcutaneous
tissue (
0.5 cm widex1.2 cm longx1.5 cm deep) were taken from the
gluteal region under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine.
The specimen was immediately placed in cold
physiological saline solution (PSS) and transported
to a laboratory where subcutaneous arterioles (internal diameter
202±75 µm) were dissected under a light microscope. After
removal of surrounding adipose and connective tissue, a segment of the
artery (length 3 mm) was transferred to a 15-mL vessel chamber
(Living System Instrumentation) containing cold PSS and 2 glass
microcannulas used to perfuse the artery.10 The proximal
end of the artery was slipped onto the proximal cannula and secured
with a knot of microsurgery thread. The residual blood in the artery
was gently flushed and the distal end was then slipped onto the distal
cannula and similarly secured. Approximately 2 mm of the
arterial segment lay between the cannulas. The axial length
of the vessel segment was set by carefully modifying the position of
the proximal cannula to eliminate any warping or buckling and avoiding
excessive longitudinal stretch.
Once the artery was mounted, the chamber was transferred to the stage of an inverted microscope and connected to a reservoir containing PSS with the following composition (in mmol/L): 119.0 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.76 CaCl2, 1.17 MgSO4, 5.5 glucose, 17 NaHCO3, 1.17 KH2PO4, and 0.026 K-EDTA. From the reservoir, the vessel chamber was continuously suffused at a rate of 40 mL/min with PSS equilibrated with a gas mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The pH was maintained at 7.4 and the temperature at 37°C by means of a water thermal regulator. Intravascular pressure was sensed by a proximally placed transducer connected to a pressure servo pump (Living System Instrumentation). Pressure was maintained at 20 mm Hg during the mounting procedure and raised to 50 mm Hg thereafter. The artery was then checked for leaks and left for 1 hour under no flow conditions for equilibration before commencing with the experiments.
Experimental Protocol
An attempt was made in each biopsy sample to dissect 2
arterial segments to perform the study and the control
experiments. In the study experiment, the vessel response was
investigated after incubation with increasing values of intravascular
pressure (see below). In the control experiments,
endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed
repeatedly, following the same procedures as in the study experiment,
except that the intravascular pressure was maintained constant. The
study and the control experiments were conducted on 2 consecutive days
in random order.
All experiments were performed under no-flow conditions, and drugs were added to the suffusion solution. After the equilibration period, vessels were exposed to PSS with high K+ content (composition in mmol/L: 78.6 NaCl, 60 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.17 MgSO4, 17 NaHCO3, 1.17 KH2PO4, 5.5 glucose, and 0.026 K-EDTA). Arteries that did not constrict to >50% of the basal internal diameter were considered not viable and discarded.
In the study experiments, the vasodilator response to acetylcholine
(Ach [Sigma]; 10-9 to
10-4 mol/L) and sodium
nitroprusside (SNP [Sigma];
10-9 to
10-4 mol/L) were assessed
after preconstriction with norepinephrine (NE [Sigma];
10-5 mol/L). The response
to Ach and SNP were obtained in random sequence and separated by a
washout and equilibration period of 
20 minutes. The first
dose-response curves to Ach and SNP were performed with an
intravascular pressure of 50 mm Hg. After the last washout, the
pressure was raised to 80 mm Hg and vessels were incubated for 60
minutes. The applied pressure was then decreased to the original
50 mm Hg and cumulative dose-response determinations to the same
agents mentioned above were assessed. The intravascular pressure was
then raised to 120 mm Hg for another 60 minutes, and
subsequently, after decreasing the pressure to 50 mm Hg,
dose-responses determinations were assessed again. Microscopic
examination (maximum power x100) did not reveal the formation of
endothelial lesions (such as blebs or
endothelial cell dislodgment) after incubation with
increased intravascular pressure. At the conclusion of each experiment,
the suffusion solution was changed to a Ca2+-free
solution containing 1 mmol/L EDTA. Vessels were incubated for 10
minutes to reach maximal passive diameter at 50 mm Hg.
Control experiments were performed to ascertain that any changes observed in the response to Ach in the study experiments were not related to spontaneous decay in endothelium-mediated vasodilation with time. To this end, 3 consecutive dose-response curves to Ach (separated by washout and equilibration periods as described above) were obtained while the intrapressure was maintained at 50 mm Hg during the 60-minute incubation period.
Analysis of Vascular Responses
Vascular responses were assessed by measuring the internal
diameter of the arterial segment at the end of each stage
of the experimental protocol. To this end, images of the blood vessel
were continuously captured by a video camera mounted on an inverted
microscope and projected on a TV monitor. After the vessel reached
a stable diameter in response to each concentration of a vasoactive
drug (usually within 2 to 3 minutes), 10 seconds of in vivo images
displayed on the monitor were recorded on videotape. Images were
subsequently digitized and analyzed off-line with a
commercially available system (Eastman Kodak). At each stage of the
protocol, the internal diameter of the arterial segment was
measured using electronic calipers. If vasomotion was present, the
maximum and minimum diameters were measured and the average was used
for calculations.
Statistical Analysis
For each dose-response curve, data are expressed as percent of
the NE-induced constriction for each vessel by the formula Vascular
response (%)=[(diameter before NE-current diameter)/(diameter before
NE-diameter after NE)]x100. Dose-response curves were compared by
means of 2-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with the
Student-Newman-Keuls method used for pairwise multiple comparisons. A
value of P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical
significance.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
At least 1 arterial segment was isolated from the biopsy sample in each of the 12 study subjects. In 11 of these specimens, a second vessel was successfully dissected; however, 3 of these 11 vessels were not viable at the time of the second study and were therefore discarded. Thus, the study and the control experiments were performed in 11 and 8 blood vessels, respectively.
In the study experiment, a significant reduction in the vasodilator response to ACh was observed with progressive increases in intravascular pressure. The mean vasodilation in response to Ach was 62%, 49%, and 26% at 50, 80, and 120 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.001; Figure 1).
|
-), and 120 (-
-) mm Hg. Baseline vessel diameters after returning intravascular pressure to 50 mm Hg were 205±78, 221±81, and 212±83 µm for each incubating pressure, respectively. Probability value refers to comparison of curves by ANOVA for repeated measures.In contrast, the response to SNP showed a nonsignificant trend toward greater vasodilation with progressive increases in intravascular pressure. The mean vasodilation in response to SNP was 40%, 52%, and 57% at 50, 80, and 120 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.10; Figure 2).
|
In the control experiments, no difference was observed in the consecutive dose-response curves to ACh obtained at the same intravascular pressure (50 mm Hg). The mean vasodilation in response to Ach was 48%, 46%, and 49% during the first, second, and third dose-response curves, respectively (P=0.61).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The findings of this study demonstrate that short-term increases in intra-arterial pressure directly and significantly depress endothelium-dependent vasodilation of small resistance arteries from normotensive subjects. Thus, transient elevations in the intra-luminal hydrostatic pressure, to which microvessels obtained from subcutaneous biopsies were subjected, produced a selective impairment in the vasodilator response to acetylcholine. In contrast, the response to sodium nitroprusside was not reduced, indicating that the increases in intravascular pressure did not affect the ability of vascular smooth muscle to relax in response to nitrovasodilators. Of note, the magnitude of the impairment in endothelium-dependent responses was directly proportional to the applied intravascular pressure, with progressive reduction in the vasodilator effect of acetylcholine as the incubating pressure was raised from 50 to 80 and finally 120 mm Hg. Importantly, the latter values were selected to mimic measurements of mean blood pressure commonly recorded in normotensive and hypertensive subjects, respectively, and thus underscore the clinical relevance of our study findings.
To ascertain that the observed changes in the response to acetylcholine were not related to a potential spontaneous decay in endothelium-dependent vasodilation over time, we performed control experiments with repeated assessment of vascular responses by using the same intravascular pressure (50 mm Hg) during the incubation period. The results of these experiments showed that, if the intravascular pressure is not increased, the ability of the blood vessel to dilate in response to acetylcholine is maintained during the time course of our studies. These observations, therefore, further emphasize the specificity of the relation between intra-arterial pressure and endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation. Moreover, that this relation is not merely due to mechanical interference of increased intravascular tension with the blood vessel response to pharmacological agents was ruled out in our study by maintaining the same intravascular pressure during the performance of the dose-response curves and by the demonstration that the increases in intravascular pressure did not affect the response to sodium nitroprusside. Finally, it is unlikely that our findings can be explained by anatomic disruption of the endothelium caused by increased intravascular pressure because optical microscopy did not reveal the appearance of blebs or other lesions compatible with anatomic injury of endothelial cells.
The present study findings have pathophysiological and clinical implications. First, our results provide a mechanistic link to explain, at least partly, why hypertension is associated with endothelial dysfunction. The concept that impaired endothelial vasodilator function may be secondary to hypertension does not contradict previous studies suggesting that decreased nitric oxide activity is a primary phenomenon in the hypertensive process.4 5 In fact, because it is unlikely that all hypertensive patients share the same pathophysiology, our findings expand the association between hypertension and endothelial dysfunction to patients in whom reduced nitric oxide activity may not play a primary role in the process leading to elevated blood pressure. Second, because impaired endothelial function is, in turn, associated with increased platelet aggregability, lipid oxidation, and macrophage migration,11 the demonstration that increased intravascular pressure can directly affect endothelial function may explain why hypertension is a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, regardless of the initial causative mechanism. Furthermore, these observations could also provide a mechanistic explanation for the development of vascular hypertrophy in response to hypertension because endothelial dysfunction is associated with the release of mitogenic factors and smooth muscle proliferation from the endothelium. The structural abnormalities developed by vascular hypertrophy can play an important role in the perpetuation of the hypertensive process, as postulated by Folkow.12 Thus, the present observations suggest the presence and mechanism of a vicious cycle in which hypertension begets hypertension through the impairment of endothelial function.
It must be acknowledged that our study does not identify the precise mechanism by which increased intravascular pressure induces endothelial dysfunction. It is possible that hypertension itself stimulates the production and release of oxygen free radicals, which, in turn, can cause endothelial dysfunction through scavenging and destruction of nitric oxide. In fact, this possibility has been demonstrated in animal models of induced hypertension. Thus, Wei et al,13 using an NE-induced model of hypertension, demonstrated that superoxide and other radicals generated after acute hypertension interfere with acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation in cat cerebral arteries. More recently, Huang et al14 have shown that superoxide released in response to high intra-arteriolar pressure also reduces nitric oxide–mediated shear stress in gracilis muscle endothelial cells from Wistar rats. At the same time, this mechanism is consistent with the previous demonstration of reduced nitric oxide activity in hypertensive humans and its improvement with antioxidant agents.15
It must also be noted that our results do not allow us to determine the time course of endothelial dysfunction induced by increases in intravascular pressure. Our observations indicate that the impairment in the response to endothelium-dependent agents develops shortly after the increase in pressure; however, we cannot ascertain whether this is a temporary or permanent phenomenon. Previous studies from our and other laboratories have shown that clinically effective antihypertensive therapy does not improve the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of hypertensive patients.16 17 Whether this is a result of permanent and irreversible endothelial damage or is indicative of a primary endothelial abnormality in these patients that cannot be corrected with medical treatment remains to be determined.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that increases in intravascular pressure impair endothelium-dependent relaxation of the microvasculature in normotensive humans. These findings suggest that elevated blood pressure per se may cause endothelial dysfunction in humans and have implications for the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension.
Received March 2, 2000; first decision April 5, 2000; accepted June 5, 2000.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE Jr, Epstein SE. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:22–27.[Abstract]
2.
Linder L, Kiowski W, Buhler FR, Luscher TF. Indirect
evidence of release of endothelium-derived relaxing
factor in human forearm circulation in vivo: blunted response in
essential hypertension. Circulation. 1990;81:1762–1767.
3.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Salvetti A. Vasodilation
to acetylcholine in primary and secondary forms of human hypertension.
Hypertension. 1993;21:929–933.
4. Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Arzilli F, Salvetti A. Endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation is reduced in normotensive subjects with family history of hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20:S193–S195.
5.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Ghiadoni L, Sudano I,
Salvetti A. Defective L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in offspring of
essential hypertensive patients. Circulation. 1996;94:1298–1303.
6.
Miller MJ, Pinto A, Mullane KM. Impaired
endothelium-dependent relaxations in rabbits subjected
to aortic coarctation hypertension. Hypertension. 1987;10:164–170.
7.
D’uscio LV, Barton M, Shaw S, Moreau P, Lüscher
TF. Structure and function of small arteries in salt-induced
hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;30:905–911.
8. Harder DR, Sanchez-Ferrer C, Kauser K, Stekiel WJ, Rubanyi GM. Pressure releases a transferable endothelial contractile factor in cat cerebral arteries. Circ Res. 1989;56:193–198.
9. DeBruyn VH, Nuno DW, Capelli-Bigazzi M, Dole WP, Lamping KG. Effect of acute hypertension in the coronary circulation: role of mechanical factors and oxygen radicals. J Hypertens. 1994;12:163–172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Fallon BJ, Heagerty AM. In vitro perfusion studies of
human resistance artery function in essential hypertension.
Hypertension. 1994;24:16–23.
11. Biegelsen ES, Loscalzo J. Endothelial function and atherosclerosis. Coron Artery Dis. 1999;10:241–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Folkow B. "Structural factor" in primary and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1990;16:89–101.
13.
Wei EP, Kontos HA, Christman CW, De Witt DS, Povlishock
JT. Superoxide generation and reversal of acetylcholine-induced
cerebral arteriolar dilation after acute hypertension. Circ
Res. 1985;57:781–787.
14.
Huang A, Sun D, Kaley G, Koller A. Superoxide released
to high intra-arteriolar pressure reduces nitric oxide-mediated shear
stress and agonist-induced dilations. Circ Res. 1998;83:960–965.
15.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Magagna A, Salvetti A.
Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation
by restoring nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension.
Circulation. 1998;97:2222–2229.
16. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Callahan TS, Epstein SE. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1145–1151.[Abstract]
17.
Creager MA, Roddy MA. Effect of captopril and enalapril
on endothelial function in hypertensive patients.
Hypertension. 1994;24:499–505.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N. Tzemos, P. O. Lim, S. Wong, A. D. Struthers, and T. M. MacDonald Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Acute Salt Loading in Young Normotensive Individuals Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1525 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Feletou and P. M. Vanhoutte Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H985 - H1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Torrens, L. Brawley, A. C Barker, S. Itoh, L. Poston, and M. A Hanson Maternal protein restriction in the rat impairs resistance artery but not conduit artery function in pregnant offspring J. Physiol., February 15, 2003; 547(1): 77 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. H. Opie and H.-H. Parving Diabetic Nephropathy: Can Renoprotection Be Extrapolated to Cardiovascular Protection? Circulation, August 6, 2002; 106(6): 643 - 645. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||