(Hypertension. 2000;36:995.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Correspondence to Lee Chao, PhD, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave, PO Box 250509, Charleston, SC 29425. E-mail chaol{at}musc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: deoxycorticosterone adrenomedullin genes kidney hypertrophy, cardiac
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prolonged periods of elevated blood pressure, whether due to essential hypertension, dietary salt, or other causes, gradually lead to organ damage, which progresses to organ failure and death. We have previously shown that delivery of human AM in the form of naked DNA attenuates blood pressure increase in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).13 Unlike the SHR, which reflects a rare subtype of human hypertension inherited in a mendelian fashion, the deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rat is a model for human primary aldosteronism and volume-dependent hypertension. Cardiac hypertrophy and renal damage occur much more acutely in the DOCA-salt model.14 15 In the present study, unilateral nephrectomy, subcutaneous administrations of DOCA, and subsequent salt loading were used to create the volume-overload hypertensive animal model. We explored the effects of a continuous supply of AM via a single intravenous injection of a replication-deficient adenovirus harboring the human AM gene in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Our results showed that AM gene delivery resulted in a marked reduction in blood pressure, significant attenuation of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and renal injury, and enhanced renal function. These findings suggest that AM gene therapy could be a candidate for the treatment of volume-dependent hypertension as well as cardiovascular and renal diseases.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements
Systolic blood pressures of the rats were measured with
a manometer-tachometer (Natsume KN-210, Natsume Seisakusho Co Ltd) as
previously described.17
Analysis of Human AM and Rat ß-Actin mRNAs
The reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction Southern
blot analysis specific for human AM and rat ß-actin was
performed as previously described.13 Total RNA was
extracted from fresh rat tissues 5 days after gene delivery by using
Trizol reagent, and cDNA synthesis was performed according to the
manufacturers instructions (GIBCO-BRL). A 453-bp fragment of human AM
was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (94°C, 1 minute; 58°C, 1
minute; and 72°C, 1 minute; 35 cycles) by use of human AMspecific
oligonucleotides (5'-CGCTCGGTTGGATGTCG-3' and
5'-CCGTGTGCTTGTGGCTTA-3'). A nested oligonucleotide
(5'CAACTTCCAGGGCCTCC-3') was end-labeled and used as an internal probe
for hybridization at 42°C. The membrane was washed in 2x SSC at
55°C.
Urine and Plasma Collection
Twenty-fourhour urine samples were collected and used for
measuring sodium, potassium, cAMP, cGMP, AM, and protein
concentrations. EDTA-plasma samples were collected via the tail vein.
Urine sodium and potassium levels were measured by flame photometry;
protein concentrations were determined by micro-Lowry assay.
RIA for Human AM, cAMP, and cGMP
Immunoreactive human AM was determined in plasma and urine by a
radioimmunoassay (RIA) for human AM with the use of rabbit anti-human
AM 1-52 antiserum (Peninsula Laboratories Inc) as previously
described.13 Urinary and cardiac cAMP and cGMP levels were
determined by RIA.18 19
Measurement of GFR and RBF
Renal function was evaluated at 16 days after AM gene transfer
as previously described.20 21 Glomerular
filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow were determined from the
clearance of polyfructosan and p-aminohippuric acid,
respectively. Renal blood flow (RBF) was calculated from renal plasma
flow and hematocrit. Clearance data were normalized to kidney
weight.
Morphological and Histological Analysis
Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg body
wt), and hearts and kidneys were removed, washed in saline, blotted,
and weighed. The intraventricular septum was
included in the left ventricular weight. Sections of the
kidney and heart were preserved in 4% buffered formaldehyde solution
and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer-thick sections
were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acidSchiff
(PAS), Sirius red, and/or Gordon and Sweet silver staining.
Cardiomyocyte diameter was determined as previously
described.21 Final glomerular sclerosis was
determined under PAS staining and was graded as previously
described.22 ECM production was quantified with
the use of Sirius red and Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe). All sections
were evaluated by investigators under blinded conditions, without
previous knowledge as to which section belonged to which rat.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons among groups
were made by ANOVA followed by the Fisher protected least significant
difference or unpaired Student t test. Differences were
considered significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunoreactive human AM levels in rats receiving AM gene delivery were measured by RIA for human AM. Linear displacement curves of serial dilutions of urine and plasma from rats injected with the human AM gene displayed parallelism with the human AM standard curve, which indicated their immunological identity (data not shown). Serial dilutions of control rat urine and plasma did not show parallelism with the human AM standard (data not shown). These results indicate that the rabbit anti-human AM antibody had some cross-reactivity with endogenous rat AM. However, rat AM differs from human AM, and they are not immunologically identical and are distinguished by the human RIA. After intravenous injection of Ad.CMV-AM to DOCA-salt hypertensive rats, immunoreactive human AM levels in rat urine 7 days after gene delivery reached a level of 71.2±27.6 ng/100 g body wt per day, whereas plasma AM levels 3 days after gene delivery were detected at a level of 8.6±4.1 ng/mL. The expression levels of human AM in this assay are considered to be only semiquantitative because of the nonparallelism of rat AM with the human AM standard.
Effect of Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Delivery of Human AM on
Systolic Blood Pressure and Physiological
Parameters in DOCA-Salt Hypertensive Rats
Figure 1 shows the effect of human
AM gene delivery on systolic blood pressure of DOCA-salt
hypertensive rats. Before gene delivery, a difference of 31 mm Hg
in blood pressure was observed between DOCA-salt and control
unilaterally nephrectomized animals (183±4 mm Hg for DOCA-salt
rats versus 152±2 mm Hg for control rats, n=10,
P<0.01). In DOCA-salt rats, a significant reduction in
blood pressure was observed 3 days after human AM gene delivery
compared with luciferase gene delivery. A maximal difference of 41
mm Hg in blood pressure was observed 9 days after gene delivery
between DOCA-salt hypertensive rats treated with AM versus control rats
receiving the luciferase gene (178±7 mm Hg versus 219.5±10
mm Hg, respectively; n=10; P<0.01). DOCA-salt rats
receiving Ad.CMV-AM maintained significantly lower blood pressures for
nearly 20 days compared with rats receiving the control adenovirus
(n=10, P<0.05).
|
The Table shows the results of physiological analysis of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats after gene delivery. No apparent changes occurred in body weight or heart rate in rats injected with Ad.CMV-AM compared with DOCA-salt rats receiving Ad.CMV-Luc. Also, water intake and urine volumes were of similar levels 15 days after gene delivery between the DOCA-salt rats injected with Ad.CMV-AM and those injected with Ad.CMV-Luc. Urinary sodium and potassium levels were also measured 15 days after gene delivery and were not significantly altered between the 2 groups.
|
Effects of Human AM Gene Delivery on Renal Morphology and Renal
Function in DOCA-Salt Hypertensive Rats
Morphological evaluation of the renal cortex (Figure 2, top panels) and medulla (Figure 2, bottom panels) revealed a beneficial effect of AM gene
delivery on DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. PAS stained
glycoprotein moieties bright red, clearly delineating the
brush boarders and tubule epithelium. The cortex and medulla of
unilaterally nephrectomized control rats fed a normal salt diet
appeared normal (Figure 2A and 2D), whereas rats treated with
DOCA salt and injected with Ad.CMV-Luc developed significant renal
injury, occurring in both the cortex and medulla (Figure 2B and 2E). The damage in the cortex of DOCA-salt rats injected with
Ad.CMV-Luc included tubular dilatation, loss of brush borders in
proximal tubules, luminal protein cast formation, areas of
inflammation, and glomerular sclerosis. Renal damage in the
cortex was attenuated by human AM gene delivery (Figure 2C). In
the medulla, DOCA-salt rats injected with the luciferase gene developed
large colloidal casts within renal tubules (Figure 2E). Human AM
gene transfer greatly reduced the size and number of protein casts
present in the tubules (Figure 2F).
|
The Table compares an overall quantification of glomerular sclerosis in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats 16 days after gene delivery. DOCA-salt hypertensive rats injected with the AM gene had a significant reduction in glomerular sclerosis compared with DOCA-salt rats receiving the luciferase gene. Compared with luciferase gene delivery, human AM gene delivery also attenuated urinary protein levels at 15 days after delivery (Table). The observed reduction of urinary protein levels is correlated with renal morphological evaluation. These results indicate that adenovirus-mediated AM gene delivery protected the rats from DOCA-saltinduced renal damage.
Figure 3 confirms that AM gene delivery prevents renal injury by enhancing renal function of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Sixteen days after gene delivery, renal function was evaluated in all rats. The DOCA-salt rats receiving the AM gene, compared with the DOCA-salt rats receiving the luciferase gene, developed a significant increase in RBF (6.73±1.26 versus 2.37±0.63 mL · min-1 · g kidney wt-1, respectively; n=5; P<0.05) and GFR (0.41±0.05 versus 0.23±0.01 mL · min-1 · g kidney wt-1, respectively; n=5; P<0.05). Significant reduction in kidney weight was observed in rats receiving Ad.CMV-AM versus Ad.CMV-Luc (Table).
|
Human AM Gene Delivery Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy
and Fibrosis
Global cardiac damage was attenuated in DOCA-salt hypertensive
rats receiving AM gene delivery. The DOCA-salt rats that were injected
with the AM gene had a significant reduction in total heart weight
compared with those injected with the luciferase gene (Table).
Figure 4A shows significantly attenuated
left ventricular weight in DOCA-salt rats injected with the
AM gene compared with DOCA-salt rats injected with the luciferase gene
(0.71±0.02 versus 0.76±0.03 g/total heart wt, respectively; n=5;
P<0.05). Further morphological evaluation by Gordon and
Sweet silver staining showed that AM gene delivery significantly
reduced cardiomyocyte diameter in DOCA-salt rats compared
with the control rats injected with the luciferase gene (21.15±1.37
versus 27.15±0.30 µm, respectively; n=300; P<0.01)
(Figure 4B).
|
Fibrosis of the left ventricle was examined under Sirius red staining as shown in Figure 5. Cardiomyocytes stained yellow, and ECM, such as collagen, stained red. To quantify ECM, red staining was expressed as a percentage of the total tissue area and was used as an index of fibrosis. Control animal sections appeared morphologically normal with very little ECM (Figure 5A). DOCA-salt rats that received the luciferase gene had large areas of intense focal fibrosis (Figure 5B). Human AM gene delivery to DOCA-salt hypertensive rats attenuated fibrosis, as observed by reduced focal ECM staining (Figure 5C). Compared with luciferase gene delivery, AM gene delivery to DOCA-salt rats significantly reduced ECM formation within the left ventricle (Figure 5D, 2.35±0.33% versus 8.85±2.52% ECM for AM versus luciferase, respectively; n=6; P<0.001).
|
Effects of Human AM Gene Delivery on cAMP and cGMP Levels
Urinary and cardiac cAMP and cGMP levels of DOCA-salt hypertensive
rats receiving AM or luciferase gene delivery are shown in the
Table. Human AM gene delivery significantly increased both
urinary (7 days after gene delivery) and cardiac (16 days after gene
delivery) cAMP levels in DOCA-salt rats compared with DOCA-salt rats
receiving Ad.CMV-Luc. However, urinary and cardiac cGMP levels were not
altered in DOCA-salt rats receiving human AM gene delivery versus rats
receiving control virus.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we observed a blood pressurelowering effect from adenovirus-mediated AM gene delivery, which is in agreement with previous studies reporting that infused AM or naked plasmid DNA containing the AM gene reduces blood pressure in rats.5 13 AM has also been reported to be a potent systemic and renal vasodilator.1 4 5 Work by Uehara et al22 suggests that a reduction of glomerular pressure can mediate local renal protection. Even though a slight reduction in blood pressure is widely accepted to provide a therapeutic value, a regional protective effect from a locally activated AM system may play an important role in the attenuation of renal and cardiovascular damage.
The biological effects of AM have been reported to be mediated by both cAMP and cGMP signaling pathways.6 7 It is well documented that cAMP is a potent vasodilator.23 24 Our results indicate that the mechanism of AM gene delivery on blood pressure reduction and organ protection in DOCA-salt hypertension appears to be mediated via a cAMP second-messenger cascade. We showed increased cAMP but not cGMP levels in the urine and hearts of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats after AM gene delivery. The elevation of cAMP is most likely due to AM binding to specific receptors on cell surfaces, such as vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and glomerular mesangial cells.6 25 26 27 Further investigation is required to distinguish actual roles of renal protection that are due to reduced systemic blood pressure versus locally mediated renal affects of AM. Long-term infusion of AM at subdepressor levels and the use of an AM receptorspecific antagonist would aid in elucidating local renal protective effects of AM.
In the present study, we failed to observe a natriuresis or diuresis effect in the DOCA-salt hypertensive rats receiving the human AM gene. This may indicate that human AM peptide does not affect natriuresis or diuresis in the DOCA-salt hypertensive animal model or that expression of recombinant human AM at the levels achieved in this study was not high enough to produce an effect. DOCA-salt rats treated with the luciferase gene exhibited renal damage in the form of elevated urinary protein levels (Table). Increased urinary protein levels were most likely due to renal injury, secondary to increased glomerular pressure. This notion was confirmed by morphological and renal function studies. Hematoxylin-eosin staining showed increased general interstitial inflammation, and Sirius red staining detected increased ECM protein production (data not shown), whereas PAS staining showed marked glomerular sclerosis, glomerular basement membrane thickening, renal tubular dilation, disruption of the proximal tubular brush boarder, and luminal protein cast accumulation in DOCA-salt rats receiving control virus (Figure 2). AM gene delivery significantly reduced renal damage compared with luciferase gene delivery in DOCA-salt rats. The renal protective effects of AM gene delivery are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that manipulation of the kallikrein-kinin system or the AM system can produce a marked reduction in blood pressure, leading to a reduction in renal injury.21 22 Within the kidney, increased cAMP levels due to AM interaction can inhibit mesangial cell growth, suppress the generation of reactive oxygen metabolites, and increase renovascular dilation, thus preventing renal damage.5 12 27 28 Therefore, the observed renal protection could be attributed to blood pressure reduction and to a direct interaction of AM with mesangial cells.28
AM has also been suggested to play a major role in cardiac function in addition to blood pressure regulation and renal function.9 10 Our results showed that DOCA-salt rats injected with Ad.CMV-AM had significant reductions in left ventricular weight, heart weight, and cardiomyocyte diameter as well as increased cardiac cAMP levels (Table). These results are consistent with previous observations by Tsuruda et al,11 who reported that AM inhibited protein synthesis in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and may thus attenuate hypertrophy in vivo. The AM-treated DOCA-salt rats had a marked reduction in both cardiac fibroblast activation and ECM accumulation compared with DOCA-salt rats treated with the luciferase gene, as evidenced by staining with both hematoxylin-eosin and Sirius red. Consistent with our results, in vitro cell culture study showed that AM peptide directly acts to inhibit collagen synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts mediated via a cAMP pathway in an autocrine/paracrine fashion.29 The reduced damage observed in both the heart and kidney is most likely due to a mixture of direct and indirect mechanisms. Indirect organ protection may be provided by significant reduction in blood pressure.
Adenoviral gene delivery is capable of producing high levels of the transgene, but because of the lack of viral genome integration, transgene expression is only temporary. Adenoviral vectors can stimulate host immune responses, thus leading to inflammation, lost of infected host cells, immune response to foreign proteins, and the inability to readminister the viral vector.29 To minimize the host immune and inflammatory responses, it is essential to develop improved viral vectors for prolonged transgene expression.
In the present study, we have shown that adenovirus-mediated gene delivery of human AM not only led to a sustained blood pressure reduction but also protected against cardiovascular and renal injuries in volume-overload hypertensive rats. The ability of AM gene delivery to produce these beneficial effects may compensate for the dysfunction of blood pressure regulatory systems and raise the potential for AM as a candidate for treatment of hormonal, neural, or salt-related hypertension as well as cardiorenal diseases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 31, 2000; first decision June 16, 2000; accepted June 26, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Gibbons, R. Dackor, W. Dunworth, K. Fritz-Six, and K. M. Caron Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins: RAMPing up Adrenomedullin Signaling Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 21(4): 783 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fejes-Toth and A. Naray-Fejes-Toth Early Aldosterone-Regulated Genes in Cardiomyocytes: Clues to Cardiac Remodeling? Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1502 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Grobe, A. P. Mecca, H. Mao, and M. J. Katovich Chronic angiotensin-(1-7) prevents cardiac fibrosis in DOCA-salt model of hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): H2417 - H2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Mullins, M. A. Bailey, and J. J. Mullins Hypertension, Kidney, and Transgenics: A Fresh Perspective Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 709 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Raizada and S. D. Sarkissian Potential of Gene Therapy Strategy for the Treatment of Hypertension Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 6 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagaya, H. Mori, S. Murakami, K. Kangawa, and S. Kitamura Adrenomedullin: angiogenesis and gene therapy Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1432 - R1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikimi, K. Tadokoro, K. Akimoto, Y. Mori, Y. Ishikawa, K. Ishimura, T. Horio, K. Kangawa, and H. Matsuoka Response of adrenomedullin system to cytokine in cardiac fibroblasts-role of adrenomedullin as an antifibrotic factor Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2005; 66(1): 104 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bomberger, N. Parameswaran, C. S. Hall, N. Aiyar, and W. S. Spielman Novel Function for Receptor Activity-modifying Proteins (RAMPs) in Post-endocytic Receptor Trafficking J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 9297 - 9307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Swaney, D. M. Roth, E. R. Olson, J. E. Naugle, J. G. Meszaros, and P. A. Insel Inhibition of cardiac myofibroblast formation and collagen synthesis by activation and overexpression of adenylyl cyclase PNAS, January 11, 2005; 102(2): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. MartInez, M. Julian, C. Bregonzio, L. Notari, T. W. Moody, and F. Cuttitta Identification of Vasoactive Nonpeptidic Positive and Negative Modulators of Adrenomedullin Using a Neutralizing Antibody-Based Screening Strategy Endocrinology, August 1, 2004; 145(8): 3858 - 3865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Matsui, T. Shimosawa, K. Itakura, X. Guanqun, K. Ando, and T. Fujita Adrenomedullin Can Protect Against Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Induced by Hypoxia Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2246 - 2251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sandner, K. H. Hofbauer, H. Tinel, A. Kurtz, H. C. Thiesson, P. D. Ottosen, S. Walter, O. Skott, and B. L. Jensen Expression of adrenomedullin in hypoxic and ischemic rat kidneys and human kidneys with arterial stenosis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R942 - R951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Niu, T. Shindo, H. Iwata, S. Iimuro, N. Takeda, Y. Zhang, A. Ebihara, Y. Suematsu, K. Kangawa, Y. Hirata, et al. Protective Effects of Endogenous Adrenomedullin on Cardiac Hypertrophy, Fibrosis, and Renal Damage Circulation, April 13, 2004; 109(14): 1789 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikimi, F. Yoshihara, S. Horinaka, N. Kobayashi, Y. Mori, K. Tadokoro, K. Akimoto, N. Minamino, K. Kangawa, and H. Matsuoka Chronic Administration of Adrenomedullin Attenuates Transition From Left Ventricular Hypertrophy to Heart Failure in Rats Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 1034 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kato, H. Yin, J. Agata, H. Yoshida, L. Chao, and J. Chao Adrenomedullin gene delivery attenuates myocardial infarction and apoptosis after ischemia and reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1506 - H1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Rademaker, C. J. Charles, E. A. Espiner, M. G. Nicholls, and A. M. Richards Long-Term Adrenomedullin Administration in Experimental Heart Failure Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 667 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhou, Z. F. Ba, I. H. Chaudry, and P. Wang Adrenomedullin binding protein-1 modulates vascular responsiveness to adrenomedullin in late sepsis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): R553 - R560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mori, T. Nishikimi, N. Kobayashi, H. Ono, K. Kangawa, and H. Matsuoka Long-Term Adrenomedullin Infusion Improves Survival in Malignant Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, July 1, 2002; 40(1): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikimi, Y. Mori, N. Kobayashi, K. Tadokoro, X. Wang, K. Akimoto, F. Yoshihara, K. Kangawa, and H. Matsuoka Renoprotective Effect of Chronic Adrenomedullin Infusion in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats Hypertension, June 1, 2002; 39(6): 1077 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikimi, F. Yoshihara, A. Kanazawa, I. Okano, T. Horio, N. Nagaya, C. Yutani, H. Matsuo, H. Matsuoka, and K. Kangawa Role of increased circulating and renal adrenomedullin in rats with malignant hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): R2079 - R2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Phillips Gene Therapy for Hypertension: The Preclinical Data Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 543 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kimura, Y. Mizukami, T. Miura, K. Fujimoto, S. Kobayashi, and M. Matsuzaki Orphan G Protein-coupled Receptor, GPR41, Induces Apoptosis via a p53/Bax Pathway during Ischemic Hypoxia and Reoxygenation J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 26453 - 26460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Nowak, N. Parameswaran, C. S. Hall, N. Aiyar, H. V. Sparks, and W. S. Spielman Novel regulation of adrenomedullin receptor by PDGF: role of receptor activity modifying protein-3 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): C1322 - C1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||