(Hypertension. 2001;37:240.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Institute of Pharmacology (R.B., H.B., R.R., W.K.) and Clinic IV of Internal Medicine (G.E., T.A.M.), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Reinhard Berkels, Institut fuer Pharmakologie, Gleueler Str 24, 50931 Koeln, Germany. E-mail Reinhard.Berkels{at}medizin.uni-koeln.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antioxidants calcium antagonists endothelium nitric oxide nitric oxide synthase protein nifedipine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With this background, it is tempting to speculate that NO, one of the most prominent endothelium-derived factors,11 12 which relaxes smooth muscle cells via the cGMP signal cascade,13 might be involved in these DHP actions. In fact, in various models, evidence has accumulated that DHPs stimulate the endothelial NO release,14 15 16 17 18 19 which may mediate or at least contribute to the above-mentioned calcium channelindependent effects.
Up to now, however, all of these findings were obtained only after acute exposure to DHPs (lasting minutes to hours). Because patients usually take calcium antagonists for a longer period of time, we investigated whether long-term treatment of endothelial cell cultures with nifedipine may alter the basal endothelial NO release as well as the expression of the constitutive endothelial NO synthase (ecNOS) mRNA and protein. Furthermore, because NO is rapidly deactivated by reactive oxygen species (ROS)20 and the DHPs may act as scavengers as known from different in vitro models,21 22 23 we also determined the antioxidative potency of nifedipine in endothelial cell cultures as well as in native cells to reveal a potential NO-protection effect as an underlying mechanism of the increased NO bioavailability.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurement of Antioxidative Effects
The release of ROS from endothelial
cells was measured in cultured endothelial cell
suspensions and in native endothelial cells with a
lucigenin chemiluminescence assay. Briefly, coronary arteries
of female pigs were prepared immediately after excision of the hearts
and stored in Tyrodes solution saturated with oxygen. During the
removal of connective tissue, special care was taken to preserve the
endothelium. The arteries were cut into rings of 0.3 cm
(wet weight 2 to 3 g), and the rings opened with a longitudinal
cut. The pieces were incubated in 450 µL HEPES-buffered saline
solution (in mmol/L) (HEPES 5, NaCl 140, KCl 5,
CaCl2 2, MgCl2 1, and
glucose 5, adjusted to pH 7.4) with or without nifedipine
or superoxide dismutase (SOD; 70 U/mL; Sigma Chemical Co) and with
different glucose concentrations (5, 10, or 30 mmol/L) for 20
minutes at 37°C. Basal ROS formation of native cells and cell
cultures was measured at 5 mmol/L glucose. Hyperglycemia (30
mmol/L) was used to induce an increase in the ROS release from native
endothelial
cells.24 25 26 27
After 20 minutes, lucigenin (0.25 mmol/L) was added (final volume
500 µL), and the emitted chemiluminescence was immediately
recorded for 1 minute with a commercially available counter
(Berthold Biolumat LB 9500). The respective backgrounds were
subtracted. The solvent (DMSO) did not interfere with the
measurements.
Accordingly, these experiments were performed with suspensions of cultured porcine endothelial cells. Briefly, confluent monolayers (passage 2) were detached with trypsin (0.05% and 0.02% EDTA; Sigma Chemical Co) and resuspended in HEPES buffer. The cells were counted, and 50 000 cells were used for each measurement (no stirring). According to our experiments with native vessels, the cell suspensions were treated (short term) with nifedipine (20 minutes before the measurement). Then, 20 mmol/L glucose (coadministration with nifedipine) was used to induce an enhanced ROS release. In addition, we treated cells with nifedipine in different concentrations for all of passage 2 (48 hours). These cells were detached, and measurements similar to those with untreated cells were performed. In contrast to the experiments with untreated cells, during the incubation with glucose, no nifedipine was present. The respective backgrounds were subtracted. The solvent (DMSO) did not interfere with the measurements.
Nonradioactive Northern Blot
Analysis
Before isolation of the mRNA from confluent PAEC
monolayers, the cells were treated with nifedipine
(untreated cells as control) for the entire passage (48 hours). Total
cellular mRNA was extracted from endothelial cells
according to a modification of a mRNA isolation kit (Boehringer
Mannheim). Briefly, endothelial cells were solubilized
in lysis buffer consisting of 5 mol/L guanidinium thiocyanate, 0.7
mol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1.3 mol/L LiCl, 65 mmol/L EDTA, 0.25%
dithiothreitol, and 0.13% laurylsarcosine. Poly(A) mRNA was
subsequently incubated with biotin-labeled
oligo(dT)20 probe and magnetic streptavidin
particles at 37°C for 5 minutes. Streptavidin-mRNA complex was
resuspended in buffer (10 mmol/L Tris buffer, 0.2 mol/L LiCl,
1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.5), repetitively washed, and heat dissociated
(65°C, solvent H2O) before being magnetically
separated.
RNA was then size-fractionated in a 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis before being transferred and immobilized on a nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim). Hybridization was performed as RNA-RNA hybrids because of superior strength and higher affinity. Membranes were hybridized simultaneously with a linearized 1.5-kb fragment of digoxigenin-UTPlabeled NOS RNA and with digoxigenin-UTPlabeled ß-actin RNA (Boehringer Mannheim) for verification of equal amounts of RNA. Digoxigenin-UTP labeling had been performed through in vitro transcription of the 1.5-kb human NOS cDNA insert with T7 RNA polymerase. The ecNOS-specific probe was kindly donated by Kenneth Bloch (Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass). Sequencing of 200 bp of the probe confirmed the identity of the ecNOS. RNA-RNA hybrids were visualized with chemiluminescence after binding of anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase conjugates with CDP-Star and were exposed to Lumi-Film x-ray film (Boehringer Mannheim). The amount of mRNA expression was quantified through densitometry with National Institutes of Health Image software on an Apple Macintosh computer equipped with a Microtech scanner and corrected for ß-actin expression.
Cell Lysis and Immunoblot
Analysis
Treated and untreated confluent PAECs were washed
with ice-cold PBS and immediately solubilized in 500 µL lysis buffer
(150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L HEPES, 1% SDS, and 1 tablet/50
mL complete protease inhibitor cocktail; Boehringer
Mannheim). The amount of protein was determined with a Bio-Rad protein
kit before equal amounts of protein were used in 1 blot. Cell lysate
protein was size-fractionated on an 8% SDS gel and blotted onto a PVDF
(Bio-Rad) membrane with wet blotting. These immunoblots
were then blocked with nonfat milk powder (2%, 30 minutes), incubated
with the primary monoclonal mouse antiendothelial
cell NOS antibody (1: 3000, 1 hour), and washed in buffer (TBS-T)
before being incubated with the secondary horseradish
peroxidaseconjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (1: 3000, 1 hour)
(Affinity Research). Protein-antibody conjugates were visualized with
chemiluminescence reagent (Boehringer Mannheim), which uses
horseradish peroxidase to oxidize luminol, and exposed to Kodak medical
x-ray film for 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 minutes. The protein amount was
quantified through densitometry with National Institutes of Health
Image software on an Apple Macintosh computer equipped with a Microtech
scanner.
Measurement of NO
To determine the NO release of cultured cells, we
used the oxyhemoglobin
assay.28 29 30
This technique measures the conversion of oxyhemoglobin to
met-hemoglobin by NO. Briefly, PAECs were cultured in
60-cm2 Petri dishes and treated with
nifedipine during the entire passage (untreated cells as a
control). The cells were washed 3 times with HEPES-buffered saline
solution. A freshly prepared oxyhemoglobin solution (1 µmol/L) in
HEPES buffer was added (2 mL) to the dishes and directly measured. The
cells were kept at 37°C during the measurement. The spectra were
measured with a single-wavelength spectrophotometer (DU 7500; Beckman
Instruments). To access the autoxidation of the oxyhemoglobin, a dish
without cells was identically prepared for comparison. The
oxyhemoglobin was measured every 10 minutes for 40 minutes. The
autoxidation spectra were subtracted to obtain difference spectra, and
the increasing met-hemoglobin formation was measured at 402 nm compared
with the isosbestic point at 411 nm.
Preparation of Oxyhemoglobin
Oxyhemoglobin was prepared by dissolving rabbit
hemoglobin (containing <50% met-hemoglobin) in phosphate buffer.
During stirring, the mixture was exposed to oxygen (95% plus 5%
CO2) for 20 minutes. Then, a molar excess of
sodium dithionite was added and gassed for 15 minutes. The resulting
oxyhemoglobin was purified through gel chromatography
to remove the sodium dithionite. The purity was controlled with
spectroscopy, and the concentration was determined with the
Lambert-Beer law.
Statistics
All data are expressed as mean±SEM for n
experiments. The results were analyzed by the
nonparametric Wilcoxon test for matched pairs and
the Mann-Whitney test for nonmatched pairs. A value of
P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Northern Blot Analysis
The treatment of endothelial cells with
nifedipine did not result in a significant alteration in
the NOS mRNA expression
(Figure 2), although at a concentration of 1 µmol/L, a
slight increase could be shown (n=4)
(Figure 2).
|
Western Blot Analysis
The Western blot analysis revealed the same
behavior as the Northern blot analysis. Nifedipine
at a concentration of 0.1 µmol/L did not alter the NOS protein
expression (n=4), whereas at the higher concentration (1 µmol/L), a
slight but nonsignificant increase was seen (n=4)
(Figure 2).
An antibody against the inducible NOS (type II NOS) (Western blot) showed no results (data not shown).
Antioxidative Properties of
Nifedipine
Nifedipine (1 µmol/L) induced a
significant decrease in the basal ROS release (lucigenin assay) of
endothelial cell cultures (n=6)
(Figure 3) and of native cells of porcine coronary
arteries (-85±21% at 1 µmol/L, n=4). This effect could be
achieved by both short-term (20 minutes) and long-term (48 hours)
incubation of the cells with nifedipine (1 µmol/L) (n=6)
(Figure 3).
|
Because in different pathological situations, such as diabetes and atherosclerosis, a marked increase in the ROS concentration has been found,24 31 32 we induced an increased ROS release in native vessels and in cell suspensions by increasing the glucose concentrations (30 or 20 mmol/L glucose). In cell suspensions, the effect was less pronounced, and at 20 mmol/L glucose, a maximal effect was elicited (data not shown). Mannitol was used as an osmotic control (30 or 20 mmol/L), and it did not induce an ROS release of the endothelial cells (n=6, data not shown).
The glucose-induced ROS release of native
endothelium from porcine coronary arteries as
well as from suspended endothelial cultures was
significantly reduced by nifedipine (short-term treatment,
20 minutes) in a concentration-dependent manner
(Figures 4 and 5) (n=6 to 8). This short-term effect could be
validated with suspensions of nifedipine-treated (48 hours,
no nifedipine present during measurement)
endothelial cells
(Figure 5). In cells that had been pretreated with
nifedipine (0.1 and 1 µmol/L), the glucose-induced ROS
release was significantly reduced (n=6)
(Figure 5). Furthermore,
50% of the ROS release could be
abolished by incubation with SOD (70 U/mL)
(Figures 4 and 5), indicating that superoxide anions or the
product of superoxide anions and NO forms a substantial part of the
ROS. Denudation of the endothelium from the artery
segments completely abolished (-87±10%; n=4) the ROS release,
indicating that the endothelium is the source of the
ROS.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to the short-term measurements during long-term treatment, nifedipine was not present in the buffer during the antioxidative and NO experiments.
We could demonstrate that treatment with nifedipine (concentration and time dependently) significantly increased the NO liberation of endothelial cells. The NO release could be completely blocked by N-nitro-L-arginine, an NOS inhibitor. This is consistent with findings of Ding and Vaziri,19 who showed by measuring nitrite and nitrate (the degradation products of NO) that the treatment of endothelial cells with the DHP calcium antagonist felodipine (0.1 to 10 µmol/L, 24 hours) increased the endothelial NO release from rat aortic endothelial cells. To investigate whether this increased NO release is due to a modulation of the expression of the ecNOS gene, we performed Northern and Western blotting. We found slightly but not significantly increased mRNA and protein levels after treatment with nifedipine. This stands in contrast to the study of Ding and Vaziri,19 who found a significant rise in the ecNOS protein mass after felodipine treatment. This may be due to differences in the cell culture model or to the use of a different calcium antagonist. They used rat endothelial cells in passage 7, whereas we studied porcine endothelial cells in passage 2, which may be closer to the physiological situation because the cell physiology may change during advanced passages. Moreover, others could show that the activity of the ecNOS enzyme is not altered by nifedipine,35 which could be confirmed with the use of another DHP calcium antagonist (pranidipine).36
The maximum concentration (1 µmol/L) used in our study is
higher than the plasma concentrations of nifedipine in vivo
(
0.2 µmol/L),35 but it
is not an unusual phenomenon that ex vivo higher concentrations of
calcium antagonists are required to achieve pharmacological
effects. Furthermore, in vivo the lipophilic nifedipine
accumulates in membranous structures, resulting in markedly higher
local concentrations.37
Nifedipine at the concentrations used in our study did not
significantly alter the cell proliferation of PAECs, so there were no
differences in cell numbers that could explain the different NO release
(data not shown).
From our data, we cannot conclude that nifedipine directly interferes with the expression of ecNOS mRNA and protein. On the other hand, it might be possible that nifedipine alters the signal transduction responsible for NOS activation. For example, Zhang and coworkers16 38 showed that amlodipine induced an increased nitrite (degradation product of NO) production in microvessels and macrovessels of dog hearts (acute addition of the DHP). This increase could be abolished with Hoe 140, a kinin receptor blocker, indicating that a kinin-mediated mechanism plays an important role. In contrast to our results, these authors did not find an enhanced nitrite production by nifedipine. This may be explained by species differences or the different preparation, especially of the microvessels (sequential-dissection and homogenization). Moreover, the measurement of nitrite by the Griess assay may be less sensitive than measurement by the oxyhemoglobin assay.39 Very recently, Kitakaze et al40 described increased cardiac NO levels by nifedipine in an open chest ischemia-reperfusion canine model.
In addition, there are reports (acute treatment of endothelial cells with DHP) that kinases,41 as well as an increased Ca2+ influx,33 may play a role in the DHP-induced NO release.
It is known that NO is rapidly deactivated by
ROS,20 and because there are
different findings that DHPs exert antioxidative
properties,21 23 42 43 44
we reinvestigated this aspect in both native
endothelial cells from porcine coronary
arteries and suspended endothelial cells by using a
lucigenin assay.45 The
previous studies usually used in vitro assays with enzymes
generating superoxide
anions,22 23
investigated the oxidation of LDL in
vitro46 or ex
vivo,47 or investigated the
lipid peroxidation of sarcolemmal membrane
preparations.21 42
In these reports, high micromolar (
10 µmol/L) concentrations were
always needed to induce an antioxidative effect. In contrast, we used
native cells or cell cultures, which are more
physiological and offer the possibility that
nifedipine accumulates in membranes, thus reaching higher
concentrations.37 In
addition, we stimulated the ROS release of the
endothelial cells because this is a pathological
situation that often occurs in persons with diabetes and
atherosclerosis. We used acute hyperglycemia to
induce an ROS
increase.25 26 27 31
The basal and glucose-induced ROS releases of
endothelial cell suspensions and native cells were
significantly reduced by short-term treatment with
nifedipine, and long-term treatment (48 hours) of
endothelial cell cultures showed an even more
pronounced effect of nifedipine. Using the lucigenin assay,
we could not determine which ROS radicals are diminished by
nifedipine, but a large part of the ROS seems to be either
superoxide anions (inhibition by the SOD) or products that result
from a reaction of superoxide anions with NO, such as peroxynitrite. It
seems that at least part of the increased NO release by
nifedipine is due to a protection from ROS, which
deactivates NO. One could argue that the ROS level may also be
reduced due to a reaction with NO (increased by
nifedipine), but the studies conducted with
nifedipine in cell-free
systems22 23
confirm the antioxidative properties of the nifedipine
molecule per se.
In summary, we showed that the treatment of endothelial cells with nifedipine increased NO release that is not due to an altered expression of ecNOS mRNA and protein. It instead seems that there is an enhanced availability of NO by an antioxidative protection. This will not rule out that other mechanisms, such as kinin-mediated actions,16 38 play an important role, too, or act synergistically. The increased NO availability may contribute to beneficial effects of DHP calcium antagonists that were found by others, such as antiaggregatory,7 8 antiproliferative,48 49 and antiatherosclerotic9 10 49 effects.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 18, 2000; first decision July 31, 2000; accepted August 14, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Catterall WA, Striessnig J. Receptor sites for Ca2+ channel antagonists. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:256262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Frishman WH. Current status of calcium channel blockers. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1994;19:637688.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kojda G, Klaus W, Werner G, Fricke U. Reduced responses of nitrendipine in PGF2 alpha-precontracted porcine isolated arteries after pretreatment with methylene blue. Basic Res Cardiol. 1990;85:461466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Colden-Stanfield M,
Schilling WP, Ritchie AK, Eskin SG, Navarro LT, Kunze DL.
Bradykinin-induced increases in cytosolic calcium and ionic currents in
cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells.
Circ Res. 1987;61:632640.
6. Adams DJ, Barakeh J, Laskey R, Van Breemen C. Ion channels and regulation of intracellular calcium in vascular endothelial cells. FASEB J. 1989;3:23892400.[Abstract]
7. Rostagno C, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Coppo M, Prisco D, Boddi M, Neri Serneri GG. In vitro effects of two novel calcium antagonists (nitrendipine and nisoldipine) on intraplatelet calcium redistribution, platelet aggregation and thromboxane A2 formation: comparison with diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil. Thromb Res. 1991;63:457462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Berkels R, Klaus W, Boller M, Rosen R. The calcium modulator nifedipine exerts its antiaggregatory property via a nitric oxide mediated process. Thromb Haemost. 1994;72:309312.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Lichtlen PR, Hugenholtz PG, Rafflenbeul W, Hecker H, Jost S, Deckers JW. Retardation of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by nifedipine: results of the International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy (INTACT). INTACT Group Investigators. Lancet. 1990;335:11091113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Waters D,
Lesperance J, Francetich M, Causey D, Theroux P, Chiang YK, Hudon G,
Lemarbre L, Reitman M, Joyal M. A controlled clinical trial to assess
the effect of a calcium channel blocker on the progression of
coronary atherosclerosis.
Circulation. 1990;82:19401953.
11. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980;288:373376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ignarro LJ. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide: actions and properties. FASEB J. 1989;3:3136.[Abstract]
13. Murad F. The nitric oxide-cyclic GMP signal transduction system for intracellular and intercellular communication. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1994;49:239248.
14. Salameh A, Schomecker G, Breitkopf K, Dhein S, Klaus W. The effect of the calcium-antagonist nitrendipine on intracellular calcium concentration in endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:18991904.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Salomone S, Morel N, Godfraind T. A therapeutic dosage of amlodipine prevents vascular hyporeactivity induced in rats by lipopolysaccharide. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1998;357:252259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Zhang X, Hintze
TH. Amlodipine releases nitric oxide from canine coronary
microvessels: an unexpected mechanism of action of a calcium
channel-blocking agent.
Circulation. 1998;97:576580.
17. Gunther J, Dhein S, Rosen R, Klaus W, Fricke U. Nitric oxide (EDRF) enhances the vasorelaxing effect of nitrendipine in various isolated arteries. Basic Res Cardiol. 1992;87:452460.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Dhein S, Zhao Y, Simsek S, Salameh A, Klaus W. Actions of 1,4-dihydropyridines in isolated mesenteric vascular beds. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:784791.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Ding Y, Vaziri
ND. Calcium channel blockade enhances nitric oxide synthase expression
by cultured endothelial cells.
Hypertension. 1998;32:718723.
20. Hogg N. Free radicals in disease. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1998;16:241248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Mak IT, Weglicki
WB. Comparative antioxidant activities of propranolol,
nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem against
sarcolemmal membrane lipid peroxidation.
Circ Res. 1990;66:14491452.
22. Shridi F, Robak J. The influence of calcium channel blockers on superoxide anions. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1988;20:1321.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Janero DR, Burghardt B. Antiperoxidant effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;38:43444348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Tesfamariam B,
Cohen RA. Free radicals mediate endothelial cell
dysfunction caused by elevated glucose.
Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H321H326.
25. Du XL, Sui GZ, Stockklauser-Farber K, Weiss J, Zink S, Schwippert B, Wu QX, Tschope D, Rosen P. Introduction of apoptosis by high proinsulin and glucose in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Diabetologia. 1998;41:249256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Graier WF, Simecek S, Kukovetz WR, Kostner GM. High D-glucose-induced changes in endothelial Ca2+/EDRF signaling are due to generation of superoxide anions. Diabetes. 1996;45:13861395.[Abstract]
27. Rosen P, Du X, Tschope D. Role of oxygen derived radicals for vascular dysfunction in the diabetic heart: prevention by alpha-tocopherol? Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;188:103111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kelm M, Feelisch M, Spahr R, Piper HM, Noack E, Schrader J. Quantitative and kinetic characterization of nitric oxide and EDRF released from cultured endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;154:236244.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kelm M, Feelisch M, Schrader J. Release of the free nitric oxide radical (NO) and EDRF from endothelial cells. Z Kardiol. 1989;78:7074.
30. Doyle MP, Hoekstra JW. Oxidation of nitrogen oxides by bound dioxygen in hemoproteins. J Inorg Biochem. 1981;14:351358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Du X, Stockklauser-Färber K, Rösen P. Generation of reactive oxygen intermediates, activation of NF-KB, and induction of apoptosis in human endothelial cells by glucose: role of nitric oxide synthase? Free Radical Biol Med. 1999;27:752763.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Honing ML, Morrison PJ, Banga JD, Stroes ES, Rabelink TJ. Nitric oxide availability in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1998;14:241249.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Berkels R, Mueller A, Roesen R, Klaus W. Nifedipine and Bay K 8644 induce an increase of [Ca2+]i and NO in endothelial cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 1999;4:175181.
34. Berkels R, Bertsch A, Breitenbach T, Klaus WRR. The calcium antagonist nifedipine stimulates endothelial NO release in therapeutical concentrations. Pharm Pharmacol Lett. 1996;6:7578.
35.
Verhaar MC,
Honing ML, van Dam T, Zwart M, Koomans HA, Kastelein JJ, Rabelink TJ.
Nifedipine improves endothelial function in
hypercholesterolemia, independently of an
effect on blood pressure or plasma lipids.
Cardiovasc Res. 1999;42:752760.
36. Mori T, Takeuchi T, Ohura M, Miyakoda G, Fujiki H, Orito K, Yoshida K, Hirano T, Yamamura Y, Sumida T, Nakaya Y, Satake H, Hata F, Pranidipine, a new 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, enhances cyclic GMP-independent nitric oxide-induced relaxation of the rat aorta. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;178:335343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Herbette LG, Vant Erve YM, Rhodes DG. Interaction of 1,4 dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists with biological membranes: lipid bilayer partitioning could occur before drug binding to receptors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1989;21:187201.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Zhang X, Kichuk MR, Mital S, Oz M, Michler R, Nasjletti A, Kaley G, Hintze TH. Amlodipine promotes kinin-mediated nitric oxide production in coronary microvessels of failing human hearts. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:27L-33L.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Archer S. Measurement of nitric oxide in biological models. FASEB J. 1993;7:349360.[Abstract]
40.
Kitakaze M,
Asanuma H, Takashima S, Minamino T, Ueda Y, Sakata Y, Asakura M, Sanada
S, Kuzuya T, Hori M. Nifedipine-induced coronary
vasodilation in ischemic hearts is attributable to bradykinin-
and NO-dependent mechanisms in dogs.
Circulation. 2000;101:311317.
41. Berkels R, Rösen R, Schlecker S, Müller A, Klaus W. Nifedipine stimulates [Ca2+]i and NO formation in endothelial cells via a kinase dependent mechanism. J Mol Cardiol. 1998;30:A193.
42. Mak IT, Weglicki WB. Antioxidant activity of calcium channel blocking drugs. Methods Enzymol. 1994;234:620630.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Silva JM, Filipe PM, Fernandes AC, Manso CF. [Antioxidant effect of drugs used in cardiovascular therapy]. Rev Port Cardiol. 1998;17:495503.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Weglicki WB, Mak IT, Dickens BF, Kramer JH. Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and the sulfhydryl-ACE inhibitors demonstrate protection against free-radical-mediated injury of cardiovascular cells and membranes. Rev Port Cardiol. 1992;11:10091011.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Kaw S, Hecker M. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, but not nitric oxide or prostacyclin release, is resistant to menadione-induced oxidative stress in the bovine coronary artery. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1999;359:133139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Lupo E, Locher R, Weisser B, Vetter W. In vitro antioxidant activity of calcium antagonists against LDL oxidation compared with alpha-tocopherol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;203:18031808.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Napoli C,
Salomone S, Godfraind T, Palinski W, Capuzzi DM, Palumbo G, DArmiento
FP, Donzelli R, de Nigris F, Capizzi RL, Mancini M, Gonnella JS,
Bianchi A, Chan PH. 1,4-Dihydropyridine calcium
channel blockers inhibit plasma and LDL oxidation and formation of
oxidation-specific epitopes in the arterial wall and
prolong survival in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Stroke. 1999;30:19071915.
48. Knorr AM, Kazda S. Influence of nifedipine on experimental arteriosclerosis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990;4(suppl 5):10271031.
49. Fleckenstein-Grun G, Thimm F, Czirfuzs A, Matyas S, Frey M. Experimental vasoprotection by calcium antagonists against calcium- mediated arteriosclerotic alterations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24(suppl 2):S75S84.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sugiura, T. Kondo, Y. Kureishi-Bando, Y. Numaguchi, O. Yoshida, Y. Dohi, G. Kimura, R. Ueda, T. J. Rabelink, and T. Murohara Nifedipine Improves Endothelial Function: Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 491 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Soukhova-O'Hare, R. V. Ortines, Y. Gu, A. D. Nozdrachev, S. D. Prabhu, and D. Gozal Postnatal Intermittent Hypoxia and Developmental Programming of Hypertension in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats: The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and L-Ca2+ Channels Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsukuda, M. Mogi, J.-M. Li, J. Iwanami, L.-J. Min, A. Sakata, T. Fujita, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi Diabetes-Associated Cognitive Impairment Is Improved by a Calcium Channel Blocker, Nifedipine Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sudano, A. Virdis, S. Taddei, L. Spieker, R. Corti, G. Noll, A. Salvetti, and T. F. Luscher Chronic Treatment With Long-Acting Nifedipine Reduces Vasoconstriction to Endothelin-1 in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 285 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Godfraind Antioxidant effects and the therapeutic mode of action of calcium channel blockers in hypertension and atherosclerosis Phil Trans R Soc B, December 29, 2005; 360(1464): 2259 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wassmann, K. Wassmann, and G. Nickenig Modulation of Oxidant and Antioxidant Enzyme Expression and Function in Vascular Cells Hypertension, October 1, 2004; 44(4): 381 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Brown, K. S. Mark, R. D. Egleton, and T. P. Davis Protection against hypoxia-induced blood-brain barrier disruption: changes in intracellular calcium Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): C1045 - C1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Otsu and T. H. Murphy Mind-altering miniature neurotransmitter release? PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 5589 - 5590. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nasreen, T. Nabika, H. Shibata, H. Moriyama, K. Yamashita, J. Masuda, and S. Kobayashi T-786C Polymorphism in Endothelial NO Synthase Gene Affects Cerebral Circulation in Smokers: Possible Gene-Environmental Interaction Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2002; 22(4): 605 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nasreen, T. Nabika, H. Shibata, H. Moriyama, K. Yamashita, J. Masuda, and S. Kobayashi T-786C Polymorphism in Endothelial NO Synthase Gene Affects Cerebral Circulation in Smokers: Possible Gene-Environmental Interaction Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2002; 22(4): 605 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |