Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2001;37:490-496

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boffa, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chatziantoniou, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boffa, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chatziantoniou, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Hypertension. 2001;37:490.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Regression of Renal Vascular Fibrosis by Endothelin Receptor Antagonism

Jean-Jacques Boffa; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Jean-Claude Dussaule; Christos Chatziantoniou

From INSERM U.489, Hôpital Tenon (J.-J.B., P.-L.T., C.C.); and AP-HP, Laboratoire de Physiologie, Faculté de Médecine St Antoine (J.-C.D.), Paris, France.

Correspondence to Christos Chatziantoniou, INSERM U.489, Hôpital Tenon, Paris 75020, France. E-mail christos.chatziantoniou{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In previous studies, we have observed that endothelin participates in the progression of renal vascular and glomerular fibrosis during hypertension by activating collagen I gene synthesis. The present study investigated whether administration of endothelin receptor antagonists leads to the regression of renal sclerotic lesions. Experiments were performed in transgenic mice harboring the luciferase gene under the control of the collagen I-{alpha}2 chain promoter. Hypertension was induced by long-term inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME); systolic pressure gradually increased, reaching a plateau of 165 mm Hg after 10 weeks of hypertensive treatment. At the same time, collagen I gene expression was increased 2- and 5-fold compared with control animals in afferent arterioles and glomeruli, respectively (P<0.01). This increase was accompanied by the appearance of sclerotic lesions within the renal vasculature. When renal vascular lesions had been established (20 weeks of L-NAME), animals were divided into 2 subgroups: the one continued to receive L-NAME, whereas in the other, bosentan, a dual endothelin antagonist, was coadministered with L-NAME for an additional period of 10 weeks. Bosentan coadministration did not alter the increased systolic pressure at 30 weeks; in contrast, collagen I gene activity returned almost to control levels in renal vessels and glomeruli. In this subgroup of animals, renal vascular lesions (collagen and/or extracellular matrix deposition) and mortality rates were substantially reduced compared with untreated mice. These data indicate that endothelin participates in the mechanism(s) of renal vascular fibrosis by activating collagen I gene. Treatment with an endothelin antagonist normalizes expression of collagen I gene and leads to the regression of renal vascular fibrosis and to the improvement of survival, thus providing a complementary curative approach against renal fibrotic complications associated with hypertension.


Key Words: hypertension, essential • nephrosclerosis • collagen • extracellular matrix • endothelin


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Development of renal sclerotic lesions is one of the most common complications of hypertension.1 This pathophysiological process is associated with changes in the structure of renal vasculature caused by abnormal accumulation of extracellular matrix (mainly collagen type I) in renal resistance vessels, glomeruli, and interstitium.2

Several recent studies indicated that endothelial vasoactive agents such as nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin could be involved in the development of renal fibrosis. NO is an important inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle cell growth and extracellular matrix synthesis in vitro and in vivo,3 4 whereas chronic inhibition of NO synthesis is accompanied by renal vascular fibrosis.5 6 On the other hand, endothelin is a potent mitogenic agent in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells,7 8 and endothelin antagonism is accompanied by prevention of vascular hypertrophy and fibrosis in several forms of experimental hypertension such as the DOCA-salt, angiotensin (Ang) II, or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) models.9 10 11

In previous studies, we investigated the role of NO and endothelin in the initiation and development of renal vascular fibrosis using a new strain of transgenic mice.12 These mice express the luciferase reporter gene under the control of the promoter of the {alpha}2 chain of collagen I gene [procol{alpha}2(I)]13 ; the observation that luciferase and collagen I gene expression are closely correlated from the fetal development stage throughout the adult life under normal and/or pathological conditions12 13 14 makes this transgenic strain a model well adapted to studying the mechanisms whereby collagen I gene is activated, such as renal vascular and glomerular fibrosis. Using this model, we have found that the balance between NO and endothelin is a key factor for the control of collagen I gene expression in vivo: When endogenous NO is inhibited, endothelin synthesis is increased locally within renal vessels, and this increase plays a major role in activating collagen I gene expression, which ultimately leads to the development of renal vascular fibrosis.12

Little is known about the mechanisms maintaining renal vascular fibrosis. In the present studies, we pursued the interaction between endothelin, collagen I, and renal fibrosis by examining whether endothelin participates in the mechanism(s) controlling collagen I gene activation after sclerotic lesions had been established within the renal vasculature, and if so, whether the use of endothelin receptor antagonists could have curative implications by alleviating renal vascular fibrosis. Our findings imply an important role for endothelin in the control of extracellular matrix formation in the renal vasculature in the NO-deficiency model of hypertension. Endothelin receptor antagonism inhibits activation of collagen I gene and participates in the regression of vascular and glomerular fibrosis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animal Treatment
Male transgenic mice weighing 25 to 35 g (3 to 8 months old) at the time of the experiments were maintained on a normal salt diet. Animals had free access to chow and tap water. This transgenic line, named pGB 19.5/13.5, was generated in the laboratory of B. de Crombrugghe (University of Texas, Houston).13 These animals harbor a construction containing the sequences -19.5 to -13.5 kb and -350 to +54 bp of the promoter of the {alpha}2 chain of mouse collagen type I gene linked to 2 reporter genes, the firefly luciferase and the Escherichia coli ß-galactosidase. The choice of these mice was based on previous studies showing that the expression pattern of the two reporter genes in embryos and adult animals closely correlates with cell and tissue distribution of collagen I.12 13 14

NO synthesis was inhibited by administrating L-NAME, an NO synthase inhibitor (20 mg/kg per day). We have previously found that this dose produced a gradual elevation of blood pressure accompanied by the appearance of glomerular and renal vascular lesions after 10 to 12 weeks of treatment.12 After 20 weeks of L-NAME treatment (when lesions appeared to reach >80% of glomeruli), mice were divided into 2 subgroups: The first continued to receive L-NAME, whereas in the second, bosentan (20 mg/kg per day), a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, was coadministered with L-NAME for an additional period of 10 weeks. Twenty to 25 mice were used per experimental condition. The choice of the doses for L-NAME and bosentan was based on our previous results.12 The animal treatment was in compliance with the European Union guidelines for animal care and protection.

Isolation of Afferent Arterioles and Glomeruli
The technique to isolate afferent arterioles and glomeruli from the transgenic mouse kidney was similar to that previously described.12 In mice anesthetized with pentobarbital, a midline abdominal incision was made, and the abdominal aorta was cannulated (Surflo 24G catheter, Terumo) below the renal arteries. The aorta above the kidney was ligated, the left renal vein was cut, and kidneys were perfused with ice-cold isotonic saline solution until all blood had been removed. Thereafter, the kidneys were perfused with a magnetized iron oxide suspension (1% Fe3O4 in isotonic saline). All subsequent steps of isolation were performed at 4°C. The kidneys were removed and decapsulated, and the cortex was dissected from the medulla. The cortical tissue was homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer, and the iron oxide–loaded tissues (renal vessels and glomeruli) were removed from the crude homogenate with the aid of a magnet. Afferent arterioles were separated from larger vessels and glomeruli by repetitive passages through needles and sieves of decreasing diameter sizes (23 to 26 gauge and 75 to 25 µm, respectively). The microvessels were recovered from the top of the 50-µm sieve and the glomeruli from that of the 25-µm sieve. To determine if parts of afferent arterioles stayed attached to glomeruli during the separation process, glomeruli were examined under light microscopy. Only a minor part of isolated glomeruli (<3%) had an attached portion of their afferent arteriole. Vascular preparations containing >90% of afferent arterioles or glomeruli were retained for luciferase activity measurements. Kidneys from 4 mice were used to isolate afferent arterioles and glomeruli for each experiment.

Luciferase Activity Assay
Luciferase activity was measured with a commercial reporter gene assay kit (Boehringer Mannheim). Tissues were frozen immediately after removal, and 500 µL of lysis buffer containing 0.1 mol/L KH2PO4/K2HPO4 (pH 7.8) and 1 mmol/L dl-dithiothreitol was added in each sample. Tissues were homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer, and cells were lysed by 3 freezing-defreezing cycles. Thereafter, samples were centrifuged at 12 ,000g for 15 minutes, and luciferase activity was measured in 50 µL of supernatant with a Lumat LB 9507 luminometer (EG & Berthold). The protein content was estimated in pellets according to Bradford’s method. Results are expressed as luciferase Light Units per microgram of protein (LU/µg). In preliminary experiments, we verified that this luminometer has a linear range when assessing luciferase activity up to 107 LU.

Measurement of Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure was measured by the tail-cuff method adapted to the mouse as previously described.12 Briefly, a piezoelectric sensor (Sensonor 840-01) connected to a carrier amplifier (Kent 2) was used to detect and convert heart pulses to electric signals. The outputs of the pressure transducer were interfaced to a data acquisition system composed of a Power PC Macintosh 4400/200 computer and a MacLab/4s 16-bit analog-to-digital converter (AD Instruments), allowing sampling at 40 000 samples per second. Pressure recording was analyzed with the chart module of the MacLab software.

To avoid variations in blood pressure caused by day cycle, all measurements were carried out between 9 and 11 AM. Animals were accustomed for several days before measurements were made. Eight measurements from each mouse were taken at 2-minute intervals, and a mean value was determined.

Renal Histology
Kidneys from at least 4 mice from each group were immersed in Dubosq solution. After fixation, 2 to 3 cortical slices of each kidney were embedded in paraffin after conventional processing (alcohol dehydration), and 3-µm-thick sections were stained with Sirius red or Masson’s trichromic solution for staining of collagens or extracellular matrix proteins, respectively.

Morphological Evaluation
Sections of kidneys were examined on a blinded basis for the level of glomerular sclerosis and microvascular injury with the 0 to 4+ injury scale, as previously described.12 Injury scale 0 means no exaggerated extracellular matrix deposition in glomeruli; 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+ correspond to 1% to 25%, 26% to 50%, 51% to 75%, and 76% to 100% of increased extracellular matrix deposition per glomeruli, respectively. The sclerotic index was considered to be equal to the sum 1xA+2xB+3xC+4xD, where A, B, C, and D represent the part of glomeruli belonging to classes 1 to 4, respectively. Twenty-five to 30 samples (at least 20 glomeruli per sample) were studied in each group.

Statistical Methods
Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA followed by Fisher’s protected least-significance difference test of the Statview software package. Results with values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All values are mean±SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of L-NAME Treatment on procol{alpha}2(I) Gene Activation
In agreement with our previous results, systolic blood pressure rose after 6 weeks of L-NAME treatment (130±2 versus 118±2 mm Hg, P<0.01, Figure 1). Systolic pressure continued to rise with increasing duration of L-NAME treatment and reached a plateau around 160 to 170 mm Hg between 10 and 30 weeks of treatment (Figure 1). Inhibition of NO synthesis increased luciferase activity in the renal vasculature before the onset of blood pressure increase. Isolated glomeruli displayed a 2-fold increase of luciferase activity after 4 weeks of L-NAME treatment (38±3 versus 20±2 LU/µg, P<0.05). The L-NAME–induced activation of procol{alpha}2(I) gene progressed with time (104±9 LU/µg at 10 weeks, P<0.01) and reached a 7-fold increase after 20 weeks (148±11 LU/µg), P<0.001, Figure 2). Luciferase activity showed a similar pattern of increase in afferent arterioles and renal cortical slices (Figure 2); in afferent arterioles, for instance, luciferase activity started increasing after 4 weeks of L-NAME treatment (212±12 versus 259±10 LU/µg, for control and 4 weeks, respectively, P<0.05) and reached a 2- to 3-fold increase at 20 weeks (516±14 LU/µg, P<0.01, Figure 2). In agreement with our previous results,12 L-NAME treatment did not change procola2(I) gene expression in the two control (nonvascular but rich in collagen type I) tissues, tail,, and skin (data not shown). In addition, as previously found, luciferase expression did not change with age (at least between 2 to 8 months) under control conditions in all tested tissues.12



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Systolic blood pressure measured in transgenic control mice (white bars) and mice treated with L-NAME during 6, 10, 20, or 30 weeks (black bars); "Bos" in gray bar indicates animals that received L-NAME for 20 weeks and thereafter L-NAME+bosentan for 10 additional weeks. Values are mean±SEM of 16 mice per group. * P<0.05 vs control.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Luciferase activity from glomeruli (left), afferent arterioles (middle), and renal cortical slices (right) isolated from transgenic control mice and mice treated with L-NAME during 10, 20, or 30 weeks or 20 weeks followed by L-NAME+bosentan for 10 weeks. Values are mean±SEM; n=4 (4 mice per group per experiment) for glomeruli and afferent arterioles; n=16 for renal cortical slices. *P<0.05 vs control; #P<0.05, L-NAME vs L-NAME+bosentan–treated group.

Effect of L-NAME Treatment on Collagen and Extracellular Matrix Formation
Early in the development of hypertension (6 weeks), the renal cortical structure did not exhibit abnormal extracellular matrix accumulation as revealed by Sirius red and/or Masson’s staining (Figure 3, A and E). Renal vascular and glomerular fibrosis started to became evident at 10 weeks, and it was clearly established after 20 weeks of treatment (Figure 3, B and F). Semiquantitative evaluation of extracellular matrix formation after 20 weeks of L-NAME treatment confirmed renal injury in L-NAME–treated versus control mice (Figure 4). Almost all glomeruli displayed extracellular matrix scores from 2+ to 4+ (sclerotic index, 3.23±0.03 versus 0.22±0.02 in L-NAME 20 weeks and control, respectively, P<0.001).



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Representative example of extracellular matrix staining by Masson’s trichrome solution (A through D) and collagen staining by Sirius red (E through H) in transgenic control mice (A and E) and mice treated with L-NAME for 20 weeks (B and F), 30 weeks (C and G), or 20 weeks with L-NAME followed by L-NAME+bosentan for 10 additional weeks (D and H). Note intense green (extracellular matrix, B and C) or red staining (collagen, F and G) during inhibition of NO; glomerular lesions clearly regressed in presence of bosentan (D and H). Bar=10 µm.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Degree of injury in glomeruli isolated from transgenic control mice and mice treated with L-NAME during 20 or 30 weeks or 20 weeks with L-NAME followed by L-NAME+bosentan for 10 weeks. *P<0.05 vs control; #P<0.05 vs L-NAME.

Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism on the procol{alpha}2(I) Gene Activation
The rationale of these experiments was based on our previous studies indicating that endothelin was involved into the mechanisms responsible for the activation of collagen I gene during the inhibition of NO synthesis.11 12 Thus, we investigated whether endothelin antagonism could delay the progression, or, even better, reverse renal vascular fibrosis. To this end, after 20 weeks of L-NAME treatment, bosentan, a mixed antagonist of endothelin receptors, was administered in vivo concomitant to L-NAME for an additional period of 10 weeks.

Endothelin receptor antagonism did not alter systolic blood pressure (167±5 versus 162±4 mm Hg, in mice treated with L-NAME for 30 weeks and L-NAME 20 weeks followed by 10 weeks of L-NAME+bosentan, respectively, Figure 1). In agreement with our previous results, bosentan administration to control animals did not modify blood pressure or basal luciferase activity in any tested tissue (data not shown). In contrast, endothelin antagonism inhibited the L-NAME–induced activation of procol{alpha}2(I) gene in glomeruli at 30 weeks (194±13 versus 48±5 LU/µg, P<0.01, for L-NAME-30 weeks and L-NAME+bosentan–treated animals, respectively, Figure 2, left). Similarly, bosentan reduced the increase in luciferase activity induced by L-NAME in afferent arterioles (539±29 versus 302±24 LU/µg, P<0.01, Figure 2 middle) and renal cortex (468±32 versus 252±16 LU/µg, P<0.01, Figure 2, right), implying a specific action of bosentan on renal vasculature independent of the increase of systolic blood pressure.

Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism on the Extracellular Matrix Formation
Antagonism of endothelin receptors markedly protected kidneys from the L-NAME–induced fibrosis as evidenced by the reduced levels of collagen and extracellular matrix staining in L-NAME+bosentan compared with L-NAME 30 weeks group (Figure 3, C and D, G and H, respectively). Semiquantitative analysis of fibrosis indicated that 40% of glomeruli exhibited a severe degree of glomerular injury (4+) in the L-NAME group (sclerotic index, 3.27±0.06) (Figure 4), whereas there were <15% of glomeruli in class (4+) in the L-NAME+bosentan group (Figure 4; sclerotic index, 2.49±0.10; P<0.01). Interestingly, bosentan blunted the degree of glomerulosclerosis, even compared with L-NAME 20 weeks group (sclerotic index 3.23±0.03, P<0.01).

Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism on Mortality Rate
This improvement of renal vascular histology during cotreatment with bosentan was accompanied by a net reduction of mortality rates. In the L-NAME group, some mice died after 24 weeks, and the mortality rate reached 36% (9 of 25) of animals by 30 weeks. In contast, some mice died at 28 weeks in the L-NAME+bosentan group, and mortality rate was {approx}6% at 30 weeks (1 of 16).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we used a strain of transgenic mice harboring the luciferase reporter gene under the control of collagen I promoter to investigate the mechanisms of regression of renal vascular fibrosis. We could show a major role for endothelin in controlling collagen I gene activation in renal vessels during inhibition of NO synthesis. An important novel finding is that bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, given in a curative way, inhibited the activation of procol{alpha}2(I) and reduced the severity of renal lesions, although it did not reduce systolic blood pressure. This result implies that during chronic inhibition of NO synthesis (a) endothelin is involved in the progression of renal vascular fibrosis by acting on collagen I gene, and (b) administration of endothelin receptor antagonists could reverse this fibrotic process independent of systemic hemodynamics.

Several recent studies point to a major role for endothelin in mediating renal fibrosis. Antagonism of endothelin receptors delayed the evolution of renal failure and increased the survival rate in rats with renal mass reduction.15 Similarly, the use of an endothelin receptor antagonist improved renal structural damage and reduced extracellular matrix (including collagen I) formation in the model of murine lupus nephritis.16 Transgenic mice overexpressing human endothelin 1 gene developed glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis without change in arterial pressure, thus corroborating the hypothesis that the endothelin-mediated fibrogenic mechanisms are independent of systemic hemodynamics.17

In recent studies, we provided additional elements on the mechanisms by which endothelin participates in the development of renal vascular fibrosis. Our data pointed to a local action of endothelin in the renal vascular beds: mRNA expression and peptide content of endothelin in renal resistance vessels and endothelin urinary excretion rate were increased in rodents treated with L-NAME.11 12 We have also found that this local activation of endothelin occurred concomitantly with an increase in the promoter activation of collagen I in renal microvessels and glomeruli. Bosentan given in a preventive way abolished the exaggerated procol{alpha}2(I) activity and mRNA expression and peptide synthesis of collagen I and markedly protected the renal vasculature from the development of fibrosis.11 12 Interestingly, these protective effects of endothelin antagonism occurred despite the persistent increase of systolic pressure in L-NAME–treated animals. In agreement with our studies, other investigators observed that selective blockade of ETA receptors prevented proteinuria and glomerular ischemia and blunted the degree of vascular and tubulointerstitial injuries during inhibition of NO synthesis without normalizing blood pressure.18

The above studies investigated mainly mechanisms leading to the development of renal vascular fibrosis, in which pharmacological agents were administered in a preventive fashion. Little is known regarding the involvement of endothelin in mechanisms maintaining renal vascular fibrosis and the efficiency of endothelin receptor antagonists as curative drugs against this disease. A major goal of the present study was to investigate these hypotheses. We observed that an endothelin receptor antagonist given 20 weeks after the beginning of hypertension markedly inhibited collagen I gene activation and that this inhibition was followed by a decrease of the abnormal collagen and extracellular matrix formation within the renal vasculature. Animals receiving bosentan displayed a less severe degree of glomerular lesions even compared with those at the beginning of the treatment (L-NAME 20 weeks, Figures 3 and 4), thus suggesting that renal vascular fibrosis regressed during treatment with an endothelin receptor antagonist. The parameters of semiquantitative analysis led to the impression that renal fibrosis did not evolve (worsen) between 20 and 30 weeks (similarity of values for sclerotic index, percentage of injured glomeruli, Figure 4). However, we do not think that this was the case, because mice started to die after 24 weeks of L-NAME treatment, and mortality rate reached 35% by the 30th week. As a result, there was a kind of "selection," and the data in Figures 3 and 4 may concern the best "preserved" animals in this group.

It would be interesting to investigate whether the bosentan-induced improvement of renal structure was accompanied by an improvement of renal function and whether the increase of survival rate could be attributed to the renal function. With measurements of classic parameters of renal function, we encountered some practical problems in mice because of the size of this animal and because control mice (at least in our strain) excrete proteins in urine to levels above the normal standards for other species. An alternative could be the use of rats as an animal model for these renal function studies. In an ongoing study performed in our laboratory, we have observed that, as with mice, endothelin antagonism induced a partial regression of renal vascular fibrosis in L-NAME–treated rats. This regression was associated with an improvement of renal function (proteinuria, creatininemia) and survival rates; interestingly, it appeared that at least a part of the decreased mortality rate was due to renal function amelioration (Boffa et al, unpublished observations).

The concept that an efficient treatment against hypertension and its complications should also address the issue of pathological structural remodeling (in addition to simply lowering blood pressure) has recently emerged.19 This concept is based on data obtained in the cardiac tissue with mainly blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. Long-term treatment with an ACE inhibitor produced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and normalized blood pressure in young spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).20 Interestingly, when the same ACE inhibitor was given in a nondepressor dose, perivascular and interstitial fibrosis regressed and myocardial stiffness was normalized. A reduction of cardiac fibrosis with a concomitant increase of matrix metalloproteinase activity was also observed in old SHR after long-term antihypertensive treatment with an ACE inhibitor.21 In two recent studies, performed in a relatively limited number of hypertensive patients, ACE inhibition diminished the volume of perivascular collagen and improved cardiac function.22 23 Contrary to the heart, there is a paucity of data concerning mechanism(s) of fibrotic regression in the renal vasculature, another primary target of hypertensive diseases. Treatment with a calcium blocker and/or an ACE inhibitor improved renal hemodynamics and prevented nephrosclerosis in SHR treated with L-NAME.24 In the L-NAME model of hypertension in rats, inhibition or antagonism of Ang II preserved kidney function and morphology in addition to normalizing systolic pressure.25 26 However, the pharmacological treatment and the normalization of blood pressure started early, when the degree of sclerotic lesions was relatively low; ACE inhibition ameliorated parameters of renal function and histology compared with the nontreated animals in the end of experiments but not compared with the animals in the beginning of the treatment.25 26 Thus, these observations are more relevant to a protection against the progression rather than to a regression from an existing fibrosis. To our knowledge, the present study is among the first reporting an improvement of renal morphology after a long-term induction of the hypertensive pathology. In support of the "regression of renal fibrosis" hypothesis, reversal of the lesions of diabetic nephropathy was observed in patients 10 years after pancreas transplantation and induction of normoglycemia.27

Although bosentan almost completely inhibited collagen I gene activation, it partially restored renal vascular histology. Animals treated with bosentan continued to display exaggerated extracellular matrix formation compared with age-matched control animals (Figure 3). A possible explanation is that the timing of observation (10 weeks of curative treatment) was not long enough to completely eliminate the already accumulated extracellular matrix. The turnover for the degradation of collagen I depends on species, tissue, and/or pathology.28 In the rat, for instance, where L-NAME–induced renal fibrosis occurs faster than in the mouse (hypertension and severity of renal lesions developed faster during L-NAME administration in rat than in mouse),11 25 curative treatment with an AT1 antagonist for 1 to 2 months can almost completely normalize renal morphology (Boffa et al, unpublished data). It is also possible that endothelin, being one of several mediators participating in the renal fibrotic process blockade of its action, does not inactivate other fibrogenic systems. For instance, transforming growth factor-ß is one of the most potent signals for the induction of extracellular matrix synthesis and renal fibrosis and is considered to mediate a major part of the fibrotic action of angiotensin II.29 Mechanical strain is another signal that can activate synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin and collagens, in human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro.30 It would be interesting to investigate in future studies whether there is an interaction between endothelin and transforming growth factor-ß and to examine the role that could play the hypertension-induced increase of contractility in renal resistance vessels or the involvement of systems that degrade collagens (such as the family of matrix metalloproteinases) in the process of regression of renal fibrosis.

Conclusions
We investigated mechanisms of regression of renal vascular and glomerular fibrosis by using a new model of transgenic mouse harboring the luciferase reporter gene under the control of the collagen I promoter. Our data indicate that endothelin plays an important role in maintaining renal vascular fibrosis and that chronic inhibition of its action leads not only to the prevention as already reported12 but also to the regression of renal lesions independent of systemic hemodynamics. This observation can have important implications in the treatment of nephroangiosclerosis and glomerulosclerosis in human essential hypertension.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the "Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale" and the "Faculté de Médecine St Antoine." Dr J.J. Boffa was research fellow of "Académie Nationale de Médecine." The authors thank Drs George Bou-Gharios, Jerôme Rossert, and Benoit de Crombrugghe (Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas, Houston) for providing the transgenic mice and Dr Martine Clozel (Actelion, Basel, Switzerland) for providing bosentan.

Received October 24, 2000; first decision November 27, 2000; accepted December 11, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Weistuch JM, Dworkin LD. Does essential hypertension cause end-stage renal disease? Kidney Int. 1992;41:S33–S37.

2. Yoshioka K, Tohda M, Takemura T, Akano N, Matsubara K, Ooshima A, Maki S. Distribution of the type I collagen in human kidney diseases in comparison with type III collagen. J Pathol. 1990;162:141–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Hayakawa H, Coffee K, Raij L. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiorenal injury in experimental salt-sensitive hypertension: effects of antihypertensive therapy. Circulation. 1997;96:2407–2413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Garg UC, Hassid A. Nitric-oxide generating vasodilators and 8-bromo-cyclic guanosine monophosphate inhibit mitogenesis and proliferation of cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1774–1777.

5. Baylis C, Mitruka B, Deng A. Chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in the rat produces systemic hypertension and glomerular damage. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:278–281.

6. Xu Y, Arnal JF, Hinglais N, Appay MD, Laboulandine I, Bariety J, Michel JB. Renal hypertensive angiopathy: comparison between chronic NO suppression and DOCA-salt intoxication. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:167–176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Hirata Y, Takagi Y, Fukuda Y, Marumo F. Endothelin is a potent mitogen for rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 1989;78:225–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Chua BHL, Krebs KJ, Chua CC, Diglio CA. Endothelin stimulates protein synthesis in smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(Endocrine Physiol 31):E412–E416.

9. Li JS, Larivière R, Schiffrin EL. Effect of a nonselective endothelin antagonist on vascular remodeling in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats: evidence for a role of endothelin in vascular hypertrophy? Hypertension. 1994;24:183–188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Moreau P, d’Uscio LV, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M, Lüscher TF. Angiotensin II increases tissue endothelin and induces vascular hypertrophy: reversal by ETA-receptor antagonist. Circulation. 1997;96:1593–1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Tharaux PL, Chatziantoniou C, Casellas D, Fouassier L, Ardaillou R, Dussaule JC. Vascular endothelin-1 gene expression, synthesis and effect on renal type I collagen synthesis and nephroangiosclerosis during nitric oxide synthase inhibition in rats. Circulation. 1999;99:2185–2191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Chatziantoniou C, Boffa JJ, Ardaillou R, Dussaule JC. Nitric oxide inhibition induces early activation of type I collagen gene in renal resistance vessels and glomeruli in transgenic mice: role of endothelin. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2780–2789.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Bou-Gharios G, Garrett LA, Rossert J, Niederreither K, Eberspaecher H, Smith C, Black C, de Crombrugghe B. A potent far-upstream enhancer in the mouse pro{alpha}2(I) collagen gene regulates expression of reporter genes in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:1333–1344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Tharaux PL, Chatziantoniou C, Fakhouri F, Dussaule JC. Angiotensin II activates collagen I gene trough a mechanism involving the MAP/ER kinase pathway. Hypertension. 2000;36:330–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Benigni A, Zoja C, Corna D, Orisio S, Facchinetti D, Bertani T, Remuzzi G. Blocking both type A and B endothelin receptors in the kidney attenuates renal injury and prolongs survival in rats with remnant kidney. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27:416–423.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Nakamura T, Ebihara I, Tomino H, Koide H. Effect of a specific endothelin A receptor antagonist on murine lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 1995;47:481–489.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Hocher B, Thöne-Reineke C, Rohmeiss P, Schmager F, Slowinski T, Burst V, Siegmund F, Quertermous T, Neumayer HH, Schleuning WD, Theuring F. Endothelin-1 transgenic mice develops glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, and renal cysts but not hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1380–1389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Verhagen AM, Rabelink TJ, Braam B, Opgenorth TJ, Grone HJ, Koomans HA, Joles JA. Endothelin A receptor blockade alleviates hypertension and renal lesions associated with chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:755–762.[Abstract]

19. Weber KT. Targeting pathological remodeling: concepts of cardioprotection and reparation. Circulation. 2000;102:1342–1345.[Free Full Text]

20. Brilla CG, Janicki JS, Weber KT. Impaired diastolic function and coronary reserve in genetic hypertension: role of interstitial fibrosis and medial thickening of intramyocardial coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1991;69:107–115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Brilla CG, Matsubara L, Weber KT. Advanced hypertensive heart disease in spontaneously hypertensive rats: lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis. Hypertension. 1996;28:269–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Brilla CG, Funck RC, Rupp H. Lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000;102:1388–1393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Schwartzkopff B, Brehm M, Mundhenke M, Strauer BE. Repair of coronary arterioles after treatment with perindopril in hypertensive heart disease. Hypertension. 2000;36:200–225.

24. Francischetti A, Ono H, Frohlich ED. Renoprotective effects of felodipine and/or enalapril in spontaneously hypertensive rats with and without L-NAME. Hypertension. 1998;31:795–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Michel JB, Xu Y, Blot S, Philippe M, Chatellier G. Improved survival in rats administered L-NAME due to converting enzyme inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;28:142–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Casellas D, Benhamed S, Artuso A, Jover B. Candesartan and progression of preglomerular lesions in L-NAME hypertensive rats. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:S230–S233.

27. Fioretto P, Steffes MD, Sutherland DER, Goetz FC, Mauer M. Reversal of lesions of diabetic nephropathy after pancreas transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:69–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Laurent GJ. Dynamic state of collagen: pathways of collagen degradation in vivo and their possible role in regulation of collagen mass. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:C1–C9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Border WA, Noble NA. Interactions of transforming growth factor-ß and angiotensin II in renal fibrosis. Hypertension. 1998;31:181–188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. O’Callaghan CJ, Williams B. Mechanical strain-induced extracellular matrix production by human vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 2000;36:319–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. Gagliardini, D. Corna, C. Zoja, F. Sangalli, F. Carrara, M. Rossi, S. Conti, D. Rottoli, L. Longaretti, A. Remuzzi, et al.
Unlike each drug alone, lisinopril if combined with avosentan promotes regression of renal lesions in experimental diabetes
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1448 - F1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
F. Helle, C. Jouzel, C. Chadjichristos, S. Placier, M. Flamant, D. Guerrot, H. Francois, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou
Improvement of renal hemodynamics during hypertension-induced chronic renal disease: role of EGF receptor antagonism
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): F191 - F199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. F. Opitz, R. Ewert, W. Kirch, and D. Pittrow
Inhibition of endothelin receptors in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: does selectivity matter?
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2008; 29(16): 1936 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Flamant, S. Placier, A. Rodenas, C. A. Curat, W. F. Vogel, C. Chatziantoniou, and J.-C. Dussaule
Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Null Mice Are Protected against Hypertension-Induced Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3374 - 3381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Placier, J.-J. Boffa, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou
Reversal of renal lesions following interruption of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in transgenic mice
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
N. Dhaun, J. Goddard, and DavidJ. Webb
The Endothelin System and Its Antagonism in Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 943 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
C. Chatziantoniou and J.-C. Dussaule
Insights into the mechanisms of renal fibrosis: is it possible to achieve regression?
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): F227 - F234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Mishra, P. Leahy, and M. S. Simonson
Gene expression profile of endothelin-1-induced growth in glomerular mesangial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): C1109 - C1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. Sorokin and D. E. Kohan
Physiology and pathology of endothelin-1 in renal mesangium
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): F579 - F589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. T. Yu
Progression of Chronic Renal Failure
Arch Intern Med, June 23, 2003; 163(12): 1417 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
A. V Agapitov and W. G Haynes
Role of endothelin in cardiovascular disease
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2002; 3(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S.-S. Ding, C. Qiu, P. Hess, J.-F. Xi, J.-P. Clozel, and M. Clozel
Chronic endothelin receptor blockade prevents renal vasoconstriction and sodium retention in rats with chronic heart failure
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2002; 53(4): 963 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boffa, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chatziantoniou, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boffa, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chatziantoniou, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide