(Hypertension. 2001;37:569.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Correspondence to Pamela K. Carmines, PhD, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, 984575 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4575. E-mail pkcarmin{at}unmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: arterioles angiotensin II kinase receptors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
has been reported to be necessary for Ang IIstimulated inositol
trisphosphate (IP3) formation,
Ca2+ mobilization, and contraction of
mesangial and aortic smooth muscle
cells.1 2 Moreover,
transactivation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor is
evident in vascular smooth muscle within 1 to 2 minutes of Ang II
exposure,3 4
consistent with the possibility that this process may
contribute to the vasoconstrictor response to the peptide. Similarly,
Ang IIinduced activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein
(MAP) kinase occurs within 5 minutes, and inhibition of p38 kinase
activity reduces the contractile effect of Ang II on rat aortic
rings.5 Nevertheless, Watts
and colleagues6 have
demonstrated dissociation of Ang IIinduced tyrosine kinase activity
from the contractile response of rat aortic rings. Virtually all studies probing the involvement of tyrosine kinase activity in Ang II activation of vascular smooth muscle have used large arteries or cultured myocytes from these vessels. The involvement of tyrosine kinase activity in evoking Ang IIinduced contraction within the microvasculature, including that of the kidney, remains virtually unexplored. Accordingly, the present experiments addressed the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation participates in the renal arteriolar constrictor response to Ang II. Tyrosine kinase activity has also been reported to modulate L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. In particular, tonic phosphorylation by tyrosine kinases has been suggested to maintain the channels in an available state for activation by depolarization.7 These channels are functionally prominent in the afferent arteriole and represent a critical component of the constrictor response to Ang II in this vascular segment.8 9 10 11 Accordingly, we also assessed the influence of tyrosine kinase activity on the afferent arteriolar contractile response to membrane depolarization.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Vitro Blood-Perfused Juxtamedullary Nephron
Technique
Arteriolar contractile function was assessed in
experiments performed with the in vitro blood-perfused juxtamedullary
nephron technique.12 After
anesthetization with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP), a cannula was
inserted into the left carotid artery and enalaprilat was administered
(2 mg in 1 mL isotonic saline) to reduce endogenous Ang II
formation. The left renal artery and vein were ligated and the right
renal artery was cannulated through the superior mesenteric artery,
thereby initiating renal perfusion with Tyrodes solution containing
52 g/L dialyzed BSA and a mixture of L-amino
acids.13 Blood was collected
through the carotid cannula before harvesting the kidney. Renal
perfusion was maintained throughout the ensuing dissection procedure
needed to reveal the tubules, glomeruli, and related vasculature of
juxtamedullary nephrons. Tight ligatures were placed around the most
distal accessible segments of the large arterial branches
that supply the exposed microvasculature. Acute surgical papillectomy
was performed to avoid an indirect,
tubuloglomerular feedbackdependent influence of
Ang II on the vasculature.14
The Tyrodes perfusate was then replaced with reconstituted
blood prepared as described
previously.13 Renal
arterial perfusion pressure was set at 110 mm Hg and
maintained at that level throughout the experiment. The perfusion
chamber was warmed, and the tissue surface was bathed continuously with
Tyrodes solution containing 10 g/L BSA at 37°C.
The tissue was transilluminated on the fixed stage of a
compound microscope equipped with a water-immersion objective (x40).
Video images of the microvessels were stored on videotape for later
analysis. An afferent or efferent arteriole was selected for
study, based on visibility and acceptable blood flow. All protocols
assessed arteriolar diameter at a single measurement site under several
experimental conditions. Afferent arteriolar diameter was monitored at
sites
100 µm upstream from the glomerulus, whereas efferent
arterioles were studied at sites
100 µm from the point of emergence
from the glomerulus.
Protocols
Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Blockade on Renal
Arteriolar Constrictor Responses to Ang II
After a 15-minute stabilization period, afferent or
efferent arteriolar baseline diameter was established during an initial
5-minute control period, after which the effects of exogenous Ang II
were assessed. Because Ang II causes similar afferent arteriolar
constrictor responses when administered from the bath and lumen of in
vitroperfused juxtamedullary
nephrons,15 the present
studies used the technically simpler method of administering the
peptide (1 and 10 nmol/L; 3-minute treatment periods) through the
bathing solution. After a 10-minute recovery period, 100 µmol/L
tyrphostin AG18 (broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase blocker) was added to
the perfusate bath. Ten minutes later, the Ang II exposure
sequence was repeated. In other experiments, AG18 was replaced with
either 100 µmol/L AG9 (inactive analog) or 100 nmol/L AG1478 (EGF
receptor tyrosine kinase blocker). Previous studies from our laboratory
have documented the stability of juxtamedullary afferent arteriolar
lumen diameter in tissue not exposed to exogenous vasoactive agents for
the duration of these
experiments.16 17
Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Blockade on Afferent
Arteriolar Responses to Depolarization
After the stabilization period, baseline afferent
arteriolar diameter was established during exposure to the normal
bathing solution (Tyrodes solution containing 2.7 mmol/L
K+). Subsequently, arteriolar diameter
responses to increasing extracellular [K+]
were assessed (20, 40, and 55 mmol/L K+
bath; substitution for Na+). After recovery
from K+-induced depolarization, 100 µmol/L
AG18 was added to the bath (10 minutes) and arteriolar responses to
increasing bath [K+] were repeated in the
continued presence of AG18.
Data Analysis
Microvessel inside diameters were measured from
videotaped images by a digital image-shearing monitor (model 908, IPM)
calibrated with a stage micrometer, a system that allows
diameter measurements reproducible to within <1 µm. Microvessel
diameter was measured at 12-second intervals from a single site along
the vessel length. The average diameter during the final minute of each
treatment period was used for statistical analysis (ANOVA for
repeated measures and Newman-Keuls tests). Probability values <0.05
were considered significant. All data are reported as mean±SEM
(n=number of arterioles).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
AG18 also attenuated efferent arteriolar Ang II responsiveness (Figure 1B). Efferent arteriolar lumen diameter averaged 23.6±1.1 µm (n=6) during the untreated baseline period. Ang II evoked reductions in efferent diameter, with 1 nmol/L Ang II decreasing the diameter by 0.7±0.2 µm and 10 nmol/L Ang II decreasing the diameter by 5.0±0.9 µm. Recovery from the Ang II exposure restored efferent diameter to 22.5±1.1 µm (P>0.05 versus baseline). AG18 did not significantly alter efferent arteriolar baseline diameter (22.4±1.1 µm); however, responses to Ang II were attenuated such that 10 nmol/L Ang II only reduced efferent diameter by 2.6±0.6 µm (P<0.005 versus untreated). Thus, tyrosine kinase blockade suppressed the efferent constrictor response to 10 nmol/L Ang II by 52±10%. Values for t50 averaged 38±8 seconds before and 43±17 seconds during AG18 treatment in efferent arterioles (P=0.82 by paired t test), indicating no change in the time course of the response to 10 nmol/L Ang II.
Figure 2A depicts the impact of EGF receptor tyrosine kinase blockade on Ang IIinduced afferent arteriolar constriction. Afferent lumen diameter averaged 22.3±1.5 µm (n=7) under baseline conditions, and 1 and 10 nmol/L Ang II reduced afferent diameter by 2.4±0.5 and 9.9±1.0 µm, respectively. Removal of Ang II from the bath allowed restoration of arteriolar diameter to 22.5±1.5 µm. AG1478 (100 nmol/L) did not alter baseline afferent arteriolar diameter (22.6±1.6 µm) but suppressed Ang IIinduced vasoconstriction. During exposure to AG1478, 1 and 10 nmol/L Ang II reduced afferent diameter by 0.8±0.7 and 4.5±0.7 µm (P<0.001 versus untreated), respectively. Thus, blockade of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibited the afferent arteriolar response to 10 nmol/L Ang II by 52±8%.
|
The effect of EGF receptor blockade on efferent arteriolar
responsiveness to Ang II is summarized in
Figure 2B. Efferent arteriolar diameter averaged 24.6±1.2
µm (n=7) under baseline conditions and decreased significantly by
1.9±0.5 and 4.6±0.4 µm in response to 1 and 10 nmol/L Ang II,
respectively. During recovery from Ang II treatment, efferent
arteriolar diameter was restored to 23.8±1.3 µm
(P>0.05 versus baseline).
AG1478 (100 nmol/L) did not significantly alter baseline efferent
diameter (23.3±1.5 µm); however, during continued exposure to
AG1478, 1 nmol/L Ang II failed to alter lumen diameter (
=-0.3±0.3
µm) and 10 nmol/L Ang II only reduced diameter by 2.1±0.5 µm
(P<0.05 versus untreated).
Thus, the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase blocker reduced efferent
arteriolar responsiveness to 10 nmol/L Ang II by 51±13%.
The effect of the inactive tyrphostin (AG9) on afferent
arteriolar diameter responses to exogenous Ang II is depicted in
Figure 3A. Afferent arteriolar diameter averaged 22.7±1.8
µm (n=4) under baseline conditions and decreased by 3.9±1.4 and
11.2±2.5 µm during exposure to 1 and 10 nmol/L Ang II, respectively.
During the recovery period, afferent lumen diameter returned to
21.8±2.2 µm (P>0.05 versus
untreated baseline). AG9 (100 µmol/L) did not alter baseline diameter
(22.7±2.2 µm) or responsiveness to Ang II (1 nmol/L,
=-3.3±0.8
µm; 10 nmol/L,
=-9.9±2.3 µm).
|
Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Blockade on Afferent
Arteriolar Responses to Depolarization
Figure 3B illustrates the impact of increases in bath
[K+] on afferent arteriolar diameter
before and during tyrosine kinase blockade (100 µmol/L AG18).
Afferent diameter averaged 22.5±2.1 µm (n=5) under untreated
baseline conditions (2.7 mmol/L K+) and
was significantly reduced by 40 mmol/L
K+ (
=-10.1±3.3 µm) and 55
mmol/L K+ (
=-15.5±2.9 µm).
Restoration of bath [K+] to 2.7
mmol/L allowed full recovery of afferent diameter to baseline values
(22.5±2.1 µm). AG18 did not significantly alter baseline diameter
(22.5±2.1 µm) or responses to K+-induced
depolarization (40 mmol/L K+,
=-10.4±3.2 µm; 55 mmol/L K+,
=-14.2±2.2 µm).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of tyrosine phosphorylation in Ang IIinduced constriction was assessed through the use of synthetic tyrphostin compounds with characteristic effects on tyrosine kinase activity. AG18, also known as tyrphostin A23, is a broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks EGF receptor autophosphorylation and platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase with IC50 values in the range of 25 to 40 µmol/L.21 22 Because AG18 inhibition of EGF receptor protein kinase is maximally effective at a concentration of 100 µmol/L,23 this concentration was used in the present study. AG1478 is a potent and specific EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IC50=3 nmol/L), affecting platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase activity only at much higher concentrations (IC50>100 µmol/L).24 At concentrations within the range of 100 to 250 nmol/L, AG1478 markedly abates EGF-stimulated and Ang IIstimulated increases in MAP kinase activity in rat aortic smooth muscle.4 AG9, also known as tyrphostin A1, is an inactive compound used as a negative control (IC50>1250 µmol/L for EGF receptor kinase).25
None of the tyrphostin compounds used in this study significantly altered baseline diameter of afferent or efferent arterioles; however, AG18 attenuated both afferent and efferent arteriolar constrictor responses to Ang II. The failure of the inactive tyrphostin analog to alter afferent arteriolar Ang II responsiveness is consistent with the contention that AG18 suppressed Ang II responsiveness through its ability to inhibit tyrosine kinase activity rather than through a nonspecific effect of tyrphostin compounds. These observations are in accord with reports that tyrosine kinase blockade attenuates Ang IIinduced pHi, intracellular [Ca2+], and/or contractile responses in vascular smooth muscle from aorta or mesenteric artery.26 27 28
Tyrphostin compounds have been reported to inhibit L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, either secondary to tyrosine kinase blockade7 29 or through a direct nonspecific (tyrosine kinaseindependent) effect on channel activity.30 Because these channels are prominent in the renal afferent arteriole9 10 and in evoking the vasoconstrictor response of this vessel to Ang II,8 we assessed the impact of AG18 on K+-induced vasoconstriction. Increases in extracellular [K+] contract vascular smooth muscle through the effect of membrane depolarization to increase the open probability of L-type Ca2+ channels. We have shown previously that the afferent arteriolar intracellular [Ca2+] and constrictor responses to this maneuver are blocked by nifedipine and diltiazem.9 31 In contrast with the behavior of nonrenal vascular beds,6 32 33 34 tyrosine kinase blockade did not alter K+-induced afferent arteriolar constriction in the present study. This observation has several mechanistic implications. First, the effect of AG18 on Ang II responsiveness cannot be attributed to a direct (tyrosine kinaseindependent) effect of AG18 on the L-type Ca2+ channel. Second, it is also unlikely that a direct effect of AG18 on the contractile apparatus or on the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile proteins35 36 underlies the impact of this compound on Ang II responsiveness. Finally, it unlikely that either membrane depolarization or the resulting Ca2+ influx initiates the tyrosine kinase activation involved in the afferent arteriolar Ang II signaling. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the relatively large transient increase in intracellular [Ca2+] resulting from Ang IIinduced Ca2+ mobilization triggers tyrosine kinase activation.
In recent years, it has become clear that activation of
various G-proteincoupled receptors (such as the
AT1 receptor) rapidly induces transactivation of
the EGF receptor and that inhibition of EGF receptor tyrosine kinase
activity prevents the subsequent events that lead to MAP kinase
activation and transmission of mitogenic signals to the
nucleus.37
AT1-EGF receptor cross-talk has been studied
primarily in the context of the mitogenic effect of Ang II
on aortic myocytes. Although the present study does not address the
sequence of events linking AT1 receptor
activation and tyrosine kinase activity to evoke renal arteriolar
constriction, involvement of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase is
indicated by the ability of AG1478 to attenuate renal arteriolar
constrictor responses to Ang II. These observations provide evidence of
cross-talk between the AT1 receptor and the EGF
receptor in both afferent and efferent arterioles, despite differences
in other aspects of Ang IIinduced signaling at these sites. For
example, although Ang II has been suggested to constrict afferent
arterioles through Gq and efferent arterioles
through
Gi,19
both of these G proteins are capable of using Src to
phosphorylate the EGF receptor for recruitment of adaptor
proteins and MAP kinase
activation.38 Some studies
that used cultured rat vascular smooth muscle suggest that Src family
tyrosine kinases mediate Ang IIinduced
phosphorylation of PLC-
, resulting in
IP3 formation and
Ca2+
mobilization.2 39
Alternatively, Ang II may trigger Gq-mediated
PLC-ß activation, with the resulting Ca2+
mobilization triggering EGF receptor transactivation and
phosphorylation by
Src.4 40 The
involvement of PLC-ß or PLC-
may represent a critical
distinction between these two scenarios; however, although PLC is
involved in Ang IIinduced signaling in both afferent and efferent
arterioles, the role of specific PLC isoforms has not been evaluated.
Hence, further investigation is necessary to elucidate the mechanism(s)
linking the AT1 receptor to tyrosine kinase
activation in the afferent and efferent arterioles as well as the
mechanism through which EGF receptor activation influences contractile
tone.
Summary
A broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor
attenuated Ang II responsiveness in both afferent and efferent
arterioles but did not significantly alter afferent arteriolar
constrictor responses to KCl-induced depolarization. Afferent and
efferent arteriolar constrictor responses to Ang II were also
diminished by an EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
These observations suggest that tyrosine
phosphorylation event(s) contribute to Ang IIinduced
vasoconstrictor signaling in the renal microvasculature and that this
process involves the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase. Further studies are
required to determine if tyrosine phosphorylation is a
critical step mediating Ang IIinduced renal arteriolar constriction
or, alternatively, if tyrosine kinase activity exerts a modulatory
influence on Ang II
responsiveness.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 25, 2000; first decision November 27, 2000; accepted December 11, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and
Cl- channels in mesangial
cells. Am J Physiol Cell
Physiol. 1996;270:C1834C1842.
2.
Marrero MB, Paxton
WG, Duff JL, Berk BC, Bernstein KE. Angiotensin II
stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of phospholipase
C-
1 in vascular smooth muscle cells.
J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1093510939.
3. Bokemeyer D, Schmitz U, Kramer HJ. Angiotensin II-induced growth of vascular smooth muscle cells requires an Src-dependent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Kidney Int. 2000;58:549558.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Eguchi S, Numaguchi
K, Iwasaki H, Matsumoto T, Yamakawa T, Utsunomiya H, Motley ED,
Kawakatsu H, Owada KM, Hirata Y, Marumo F, Inagami T. Calcium-dependent
epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation mediates the
angiotensin II-induced mitogen-activated protein
kinase activation in vascular smooth muscle cells.
J Biol Chem. 1998;273:88908896.
5.
Meloche S, Landry
J, Huot J, Houle F, Marceau F, Giasson E. p38 MAP kinase pathway
regulates angiotensin II-induced contraction of rat
vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol
Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H741-H751.
6.
Watts SW, Florian
JA, Monroe KM. Dissociation of angiotensin II-stimulated
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase from
vascular contraction. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 1998;286:14311438.
7. Liu H, Sperelakis N. Tyrosine kinases modulate the activity of single L-type calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle cells from rat portal vein. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;75:10631068.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Carmines PK, Navar
LG. Disparate effects of Ca channel blockade on afferent and efferent
arteriolar responses to ANG II. Am J
Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 1989;256:F1015F1020.
9.
Carmines PK, Fowler
BC, Bell PD. Segmentally distinct effects of depolarization on
intracellular [Ca2+] in renal arterioles.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte
Physiol. 1993;265:F677F685.
10.
Loutzenhiser R,
Hayashi K, Epstein M. Divergent effects of KCl-induced depolarization
on afferent and efferent arterioles.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte
Physiol. 1989;257:F561F564.
11.
Loutzenhiser K,
Loutzenhiser R. Angiotensin IIinduced
Ca2+ influx in renal afferent and efferent
arterioles: differing roles of voltage-gated and store-operated
Ca2+ entry.
Circ Res. 2000;87:551557.
12.
Casellas D, Navar
LG. In vitro perfusion of juxtamedullary nephrons in rats.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte
Physiol. 1984;246:F349F358.
13.
Ohishi K,
Carmines PK, Inscho EW, Navar LG. EDRF-angiotensin II
interactions in rat juxtamedullary afferent and efferent arterioles.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte
Physiol. 1992;263:F900F906.
14. Ikenaga H, Fallet RW, Carmines PK. Contribution of tubuloglomerular feedback to renal arteriolar angiotensin II responsiveness. Kidney Int. 1996;49:3439.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ito S, Amin J, Ren YL, Arima S, Abe K, Carretero OA. Heterogeneity of angiotensin action in renal circulation. Kidney Int. 1997;52:S128S131.
16.
Harrison-Bernard
LM, Carmines PK. Juxtamedullary microvascular responses to arginine
vasopressin in rat kidney. Am J
Physiol. 1994;267:F249F256.
17.
Ikenaga H, Bast
JP, Fallet RW, Carmines PK. Exaggerated impact of ATP-sensitive
K+ channels on afferent arteriolar diameter
in diabetes mellitus. J Am Soc
Nephrol. 2000;11:11991207.
18. Loutzenhiser R, Epstein M, Hayashi K, Takenaka T, Forster H. Characterization of the renal microvascular effects of angiotensin II antagonist, DuP 753: studies in isolated perfused hydronephrotic kidneys. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:309S-314S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Takenaka T, Suzuki H, Fujiwara K, Kanno Y, Ohno Y, Hayashi K, Nagahama T, Saruta T. Cellular mechanisms mediating rat renal microvascular constriction by angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:21072114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Casellas D, Carmines PK. Control of the renal microvasculature: cellular and integrative perspectives. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1996;5:5763.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Bilder GE,
Krawiec JA, McVety K, Gazit A, Gilon C, Lyall R, Zilberstein A,
Levitzki A, Perrone MH, Schreiber AB. Tyrphostins inhibit PDGF-induced
DNA synthesis and associated early events in smooth muscle cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1991;260:C721C730.
22. Levitzki A, Gilon S. Tyrphostins as molecular tools and potential antiproliferative drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1991;12:171174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Lyall RM,
Zilberstein A, Gazit A, Gilon C, Levitzki A, Schlessinger J.
Tyrphostins inhibit epidermal growth factor (EGF)-receptor tyrosine
kinase activity in living cells and EGF-stimulated cell proliferation.
J Biol Chem. 1989;264:1450314509.
24.
Levitzki A, Gazit
A. Tyrosine kinase inhibition: an approach to drug development.
Science. 1995;267:17821788.
25. Gazit A, Yaish P, Gilon C, Levitzki A. Tyrphostins I: synthesis and biological activity of protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 1989;32:23442352.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Touyz RM,
Schiffrin EL. Angiotensin II regulates vascular smooth
muscle cell pH, contraction, and growth via tyrosine kinase-dependent
signaling pathways.
Hypertension. 1997;30:222229.
27.
Touyz RM,
Schiffrin EL. Tyrosine kinase signaling pathways modulate
angiotensin II- induced calcium
([Ca2+]i)
transients in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Hypertension. 1996;27:10971103.
28. Malloy LG, Sauro MD. Tyrosine kinase inhibition suppresses angiotensin contraction in hypertensive and normotensive small resistance arteries. Life Sci. 1996;58:PL317-PL324.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Wijetunge S, Hughes AD. Effect of platelet-derived growth factor on voltage-operated calcium channels in rabbit isolated ear artery cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;115:534538.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Wijetunge S, Aalkjaer C, Schachter M, Hughes AD. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors block calcium channel currents in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;189:16201623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Carmines PK, Ohishi K, Ikenaga H. Functional impairment of renal afferent arteriolar voltage-gated calcium channels in rats with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:25642571.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Masumoto N, Nakayama K, Oyabe A, Uchino M, Ishii K, Obara K, Tanabe Y. Specific attenuation of the pressure-induced contraction of rat cerebral artery by herbimycin A. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;330:5563.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Watts SW, Yeum CH, Campbell G, Webb RC. Serotonin stimulates protein tyrosyl phosphorylation and vascular contraction via tyrosine kinase. J Vasc Res. 1996;33:288298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Gould EM, Rembold
CM, Murphy RA. Genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor,
reduces Ca2+ mobilization in swine carotid
media. Am J Physiol Cell
Physiol. 1995;268:C1425C1429.
35. Ohanian J, Ohanian V, Shaw L, Bruce C, Heagerty AM. Involvement of tyrosine phosphorylation in endothelin-1-induced calcium-sensitization in rat small mesenteric arteries. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:653661.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Di Salvo J, Pfitzer G, Semenchuk LA. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation, cellular Ca2+, and Ca 2+ sensitivity for contraction of smooth muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994;72:14341439.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Harris RC. EGF receptor activation by G-protein coupled receptors. Kidney Int. 2000;58:898899.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Daub H, Wallasch C, Lankenau A, Herrlich A, Ullrich A. Signal characteristics of G protein-transactivated EGF receptor. EMBO J. 1997;16:70327044.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Marrero MB,
Schieffer B, Paxton WG, Schieffer E, Bernstein KE. Electroporation of
pp60c-src antibodies inhibits the
angiotensin II activation of phospholipase C-g1 in rat
aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol
Chem. 1995;270:1573415738.
40. Inagami T, Eguchi S, Numaguchi K, Motley ED, Tao H, Matsumoto T, Yamakawa T. Cross-talk between angiotensin II receptors and the tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:S57S61.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Escano Jr., L. B. Keever, A. A. Gutweiler, and B. T. Andresen Angiotensin II Activates Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Independently of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Renal Smooth Muscle Cells: Implications for Blood Pressure Regulation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2008; 324(1): 34 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-Z. Ying, H.-G. Zhang, and P. W. Sanders EGF Receptor Activity Modulates Apoptosis Induced by Inhibition of the Proteasome of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 131 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-Z. Ying and P. W. Sanders Enhanced expression of EGF receptor in a model of salt-sensitive hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): F314 - F321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Che and P. K. Carmines Src family kinase involvement in rat preglomerular microvascular contractile and [Ca2+]i responses to ANG II Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): F658 - F664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Salomonsson and W. J. Arendshorst Effect of tyrosine kinase blockade on norepinephrine-induced cytosolic calcium response in rat afferent arterioles Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): F866 - F874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Rohra, T. Yamakuni, K.-I. Furukawa, N. Ishii, T. Shinkawa, T. Isobe, and Y. Ohizumi Stimulated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Causes Acidic pH-Induced Contraction in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Aorta J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 1255 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Che and P. K. Carmines Angiotensin II Triggers EGFR Tyrosine Kinase-Dependent Ca2+ Influx in Afferent Arterioles Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 700 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Carter and N. L. Kanagy Tyrosine kinases regulate intracellular calcium during alpha 2-adrenergic contraction in rat aorta Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): H1673 - H1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kagiyama, S. Eguchi, G. D. Frank, T. Inagami, Y. C. Zhang, and M. I. Phillips Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Hypertension Are Attenuated by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antisense Circulation, August 20, 2002; 106(8): 909 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |