Hypertension. 2001;37:1298-1302
(Hypertension. 2001;37:1298.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Insulin-Induced Biphasic Responses in Rat Mesenteric Vascular Bed
Role of Endothelin
Derek A. Misurski;
Sheng-Qian Wu;
J. Robert McNeill;
Thomas W. Wilson;
Venkat Gopalakrishnan
From the Department of Pharmacology and the Cardiovascular Risk Factor
Reduction Unit, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan, Canada.
Correspondence to Venkat Gopalakrishnan, PhD, Department of Pharmacology and the CRFRU, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5 Canada. E-mail Gopal{at}Sask.Usask.Ca
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
AbstractThe
vasodilatory capacity of insulin has been
widely reported, yet some
investigators have not noted this
effect. Because insulin has been
shown to enhance endothelin
release, we speculated that endothelin
could be attenuating
insulin-evoked vasodilation. We examined the
effect of ex vivo
insulin perfusion on vascular resistance by using the
Sprague-Dawley
rat mesenteric vascular bed. In
methoxamine-preconstricted
preparations, insulin (3.0 pmol/L to
10 nmol/L) evoked a concentration-dependent
decrease in perfusion
pressure (PP) with a maximal response
of 42.0±9.2%, whereas
continuous exposure to 10 nmol/L
insulin induced a 51.8±3.5%
relaxation. Further exposure
to 10 nmol/L insulin resulted in the
generation of endothelin
and a subsequent loss of the vasodilatory
response. Indomethacin
had no effect on vascular
responses. The vasodilatory response
was significantly inhibited by
nitric oxide synthase inhibition
(20.5±4.2%;
P<0.01) and
calcium-activated potassium
channel blockade (28.5±3.7%;
P<0.05).
Endothelial
denudation attenuated the vasodilatory
component (20.3±7.1%;
P<0.01) and altered the
biphasic pattern of the response.
The decline in insulin-evoked
vasodilation was significantly
prevented by an endothelin-A
antagonist (BQ123), an endothelin-B
antagonist
(BQ788), and nonselective endothelin blockade with
both BQ123 and
BQ788. These results demonstrate that the endothelium
is intimately involved in regulating the vascular response
to insulin.
Insulin promotes the release of nitric oxide and
endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. During
sustained
exposure to higher concentrations, this vasodilatory effect
is countered by the pathological generation of endothelin.
Endothelin
receptor blockade facilitates the maintenance of
vasodilation
despite high insulin concentrations.
Key Words: insulin nitric oxide vasodilation endothelin endothelium mesenteric arteries
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The ability of
insulin to induce vasodilation is integral to
the regulation of
skeletal muscle blood flow and glucose
delivery.
1 2 3
Insulin-mediated vasodilation is impaired in insulin-resistant
patients, suggesting a close relation between insulin resistance
and
hypertension.
4 5
However, despite the potential significance,
the mechanism(s)
underlying direct vascular effects of insulin
remain
controversial.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Several studies in animals and humans attribute the vasodilatory
effect
of insulin to enhanced generation of
endothelium-derived
nitric oxide
(EDNO).
2 11 12 13 14 15 16
On the contrary,
there have been reports supporting an
endothelium-independent
mechanism.
5 6 7 8 9 10
Incubation with insulin has been shown
to reduce cytosolic-free calcium
levels
6 and to increase the
expression of the sodium pump gene, leading to
hyperpolarization
of vascular smooth muscle (VSM)
cells.
7 Insulin enhancement
of vascular ß-adrenergic responsiveness has also
been reported in
normotensive animals and
humans.
8 9 In the
perfused rat mesenteric vascular bed (MVB), insulin-evoked
vasodilation
has been linked to the activation of calcitonin
generelated peptide
receptors on the VSM
cells.
10 Interestingly,
these investigators noted that endothelial denudation
of the MVB enhanced vasodilator responses to insulin, implicating
the
release of a contracting factor from the
endothelium.
10
Moreover, a few reports have demonstrated the lack of a vasodilator
response to
insulin.
17 18
Therefore, an explanation that
insulin is simultaneously
promoting the release of a contractile
substance countering the release
of vasodilator factor(s) is
indeed possible, because several in vitro
and in vivo studies
have shown that insulin promotes endothelin-1
(ET-1) generation
in the vascular
endothelium.
19 20 21 22 23 24
This activity
may account for the paradoxical vascular effects of
insulin.
To assess this hypothesis, we investigated the
endothelium-dependent
and
endothelium-independent effects of insulin on the
vasculature.
The perfused rat MVB was used because it is a
well-established
representation of vascular resistance
function.
25
 |
Methods
|
|---|
MVB Perfusion
Experiments were performed with 80 male
Sprague-Dawley rats
(Charles River) weighing 410 to 515 g. Animals
were killed
under pentobarbital anesthesia (65 mg/kg IP).
All procedures
were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the
university
animal care committee. The vascular bed was removed,
cannulated,
and perfused as previously
described.
26 An
equilibration
period of 30 minutes was allowed to stabilize the
baseline.
This was followed by perfusion of a Krebs solution containing
the
1-agonist methoxamine (MTX, 70
µmol/L), either in
the presence or absence of the following agents:
(1) a combination
of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors
N
-nitro-
L-arginine
(L-NNA, 100 µmol/L) and
NG-nitro-
L-arginine-methylester
(L-NAME, 100 µmol/L) to maximally inhibit the enzyme;
(2) a
calcium-activated potassium channel blocker
(K
Ca), which
serves as an
endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor [EDHF]
blocker, (tetrabutylammonium [TBA], 0.5 mmol/L); (3) a
cyclooxygenase
inhibitor
(indomethacin, 10 µmol/L); (4) an
ET
A receptor
blocker (BQ123,100 nmol/L); (5) an
ET
B receptor blocker (BQ788,
100 nmol/L); and
(6) a combination of ET
A and
ET
B receptor
blockers (BQ123 and BQ788, 100
nmol/L each). Denudation was
accomplished as previously
described.
26 The MTX-induced
elevation
in baseline PP was allowed to stabilize for 20 to 30 minutes
before the remainder of the protocol was conducted. After 20
to 30
minutes, a maximal dose of acetylcholine (ACh) was injected
into the
perfusate. A washout was then allowed before insulin
perfusion
was initiated. On stabilization of the MTX-constricted
baseline,
insulin was added to the perfusate in concentrations
of 3.0
pmol/L, 10 pmol/L, 30 pmol/L, 100 pmol/L, 300 pmol/L...3.0
µmol/L
sequentially, and each concentration was perfused
for 4 minutes,
resulting in a cumulative response. Single concentrations
of insulin
(1.0 nmol/L or 10 nmol/L) and insulin-derived growth
factor (IGF)-1
(1.0 nmol/L and 10 nmol/L) or MTX alone was
also included in the
perfusate over a period of 1 hour (n=4).
To assess the
postinsulin vasodilation capacity of the VSM,
a maximal dose of a
direct NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP),
was
injected.
Assessment of Endothelin Generation
To assess whether the loss of insulin-induced
vasodilation was attributable to ET, we collected the MVB
perfusate for 10 minutes during both the baseline and MTX
equilibration periods. After this, perfusate was collected
every 10 minutes for 1 hour during exposure to fixed concentrations of
insulin, IGF-1, or MTX as a control. The ET level in the
perfusate was measured with a sensitive enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit as previously
described.27
Reagents
MTX, TBA, L-NNA, L-NAME,
indomethacin, ACh, SNP, and insulin (human USP) were
all purchased from Sigma. Alcohol was used to dissolve
indomethacin at a final concentration of 1/2000 and was
added to all solutions. BQ123 and BQ788 were obtained from American
Peptide. Krebs solution salts were obtained from BDH. The enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit was obtained from Biomedica Gruppe. Amprep
Octadecyl C18 columns were from Amersham.
Statistical Analysis
Cumulative concentration-response curves were
analyzed individually. The results are expressed as the
percentage of vasodilation of MTX-evoked contraction. The potency of
insulin-induced vasodilation was expressed as the negative logarithm of
the half-maximal response (pD2 value). Both
maximal responses and the pD2 were expressed as
mean±SEM. Comparison of mean values among various groups was performed
by ANOVA methodology (Superanova programSAS Institute).
Simultaneous multiple comparisons were examined by
Scheffés F
test.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Vascular Responses to Perfusion of
Insulin
Perfusion of the MVB with MTX resulted in a
vasoconstriction
and an elevation in the PP (49.0±5.1 mm Hg). In
MTX-preconstricted
preparations, cumulative insulin perfusion resulted
in a concentration-dependent
decrease in PP. At concentrations of
insulin >10 nmol/L,
the decrease in PP gradually diminished such that
at a maximal
concentration of insulin (3 µmol/L), there was no
decrease
in PP. A representative tracing from a single
experiment is
shown in
Figure 1
. The pD
2 value for the
insulin-mediated
vasodilation was 10.3±0.1 (-log mol/L), and the
maximal
relaxation of MTX-induced PP was 42.0±9.2%
(Table
).
The continuous perfusion of a fixed concentration of insulin
(1.0
nmol/L) induced vasodilation (31.0±2.2%) shortly
after being exposed
to the MVB, whereas perfusion of insulin
(10 nmol/L) produced a larger
relaxation of 51.8±3.5%
(
P<0.01). By comparison, the
maximal relaxation response
attained with ACh and SNP as vasodilatory
agents were 93.0±7.8%
and 98.4±4.4%, respectively. The basal ET
level in the
perfusate was 46.5±7.2 pg/50 mL. There was no
significant
change in ET levels when MTX alone was perfused for a
period
of 1 hour
(Figure 2A
). Although continuous perfusion of a fixed
concentration of insulin (1 nmol/L) did not evoke an increase
in ET
production after 1 hour (data not shown), insulin (10
nmol/L)
significantly increased
(
P<0.01) ET generation
at a
20-minute time period and thereafter
(Figure 2A
). This
was accompanied by a gradual loss of the
vasodilatory response,
as depicted in the
representative tracing of a single experiment
(see
Figure 2B
). The residual vasodilation after perfusion
of 10
nmol/L insulin for 1 hour was 5.6±3.2%. Perfusion
of IGF-1 for up to
1 hour did not affect the changes in PP
to MTX (data not
shown).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Representative tracing of cumulative vasodilator response to perfusion with increasing concentrations of insulin (3.0 pmol/L to 3 µmol/L) in rat isolated perfused MVB. Each arrow represents end of 4-minute perfusion. Increase in vascular tone was maintained by perfusion with 70 µmol/L MTX.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. Effects of Treatment on pD2 and Percent Maximal
Vasodilation of MTX-Induced (70 µmol/L) Tone Produced by Insulin
in Perfused MVB of Sprague-Dawley Rats
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. A, ET-1 content in MVB perfusate collected at 10-minute intervals. Perfusate was collected during baseline perfusion and in presence of MTX (70 µmol/L). Subsequently, MVB was perfused with MTX and insulin (10 nmol/L) containing buffer (solid squares) or continued on MTX perfusion alone. Perfusate was collected consecutively at 10-minute intervals for 60 minutes. Insulin perfusion induced substantial increase in ET generation relative to MTX control (** P<0.01). B, First representative tracing demonstrates effect of insulin (10 nmol/L) on MTX-induced elevation in MVB PP. Second tracing represents effect of insulin (1 nmol/L); third tracing represents no alteration as seen in response to IGF-1 (10 nmol/L).
|
|
Effects of Treatment on Insulin
Perfusion
Inclusion of inhibitors of
endothelium-mediated vasodilation and contraction in
the perfusion solution did not have any significant effect on the
MTX-induced increase in PP. Endothelial denudation
(P<0.01), NOS inhibition
(P<0.05), and TBA
(P<0.05) reduced the maximal
vasodilator responses to ACh, whereas neither
indomethacin nor ET antagonists had any
effect. Endothelial denudation significantly attenuated
(P<0.01) insulin-induced
vasodilation
(Figure 3A), resulting in both a decrease in the maximal
vasodilation (P<0.01) and a
right shift in the concentration-response curve
(P<0.01;
Table).
NOS inhibition (P<0.01) and
TBA (P<0.05;
Figure 3B) both attenuated insulin-evoked maximal dilation
(Table).
ETA and nonselective ET-receptor blockade
prevented the loss of vasodilation associated with insulin
concentrations starting at 10 nmol/L
(Figure 3C). Neither selective ET-receptor blockade nor
nonselective ET blockade produced any significant change in the potency
or maximal effect of insulin-evoked vasodilation
(Table).
Maximal SNP responses did not differ among the
groups.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Log dose-response curves for relaxation of MTX-preconstricted MVB by insulin. Insulin-evoked vasodilation in endothelium-intact preparation is represented by open circle. A, Endothelium-denuded preparation is represented by closed circle. B, NOS inhibition with L-NAME and L-NNA (100 µmol/L each) is represented by open triangle. Calcium-activated potassium channel blockade with TBA (0.5 mmol/L) is represented by closed triangle. C, ETA receptor blockade with BQ123 (100 nmol/L) is represented by open square. ETA and ETB receptor blockade with BQ123 and BQ788 (100 nmol/L each) is represented by closed square. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs respective control).
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The results of this investigation demonstrate a
concentration-dependent
effect of insulin on vascular reactivity and
that in the presence
of higher concentrations, the duration of exposure
is of consequence.
The ability of NOS inhibition and
K
Ca blockade to attenuate
the initial
vasodilatory response suggests the involvement
of EDNO and EDHF.
Although at higher concentrations, insulin
initially produces a more
profound vasodilation than at lower
doses, sustained exposure
stimulates the production and release
of ET, which diminishes
the preceding vasodilation. Subsequently,
ET-receptor blockade
maintains vasodilation. Because the MVB
contributes significantly to
the resistance function of the
vasculature,
25 the
present study supports the notion that
hyperinsulinemic-evoked imbalances in
endothelium-derived
factors may contribute to
insulin-resistant hypertension. A
recent investigation by
Cardillo et al
16 also
demonstrated
the ability of ET-receptor blockade to increase forearm
blood
flow during hyperinsulinemia.
Insulin has been shown to have profound effects on the ET
system, promoting the release of
ET-119 20 21 22 23 24
and upregulating ET receptors on VSM
cells.28 29
Incubation of bovine aortic endothelial cells with
insulin in vitro increases the production and release of ET-1
within 10 minutes, an effect that was maximal within 1 to 2
hours.19 20 Our
results are consistent with these in vitro observations.
Insulin also increases ET-1 production in cultured human VSM
cells,21 supporting the
finding of enhanced ET release in both healthy as well as obese
noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus human
subjects.22 23
The concentration of insulin (10 nmol/L) that evoked significant ET
generation in the present study may be relevant to in vivo
situations because similar concentrations of plasma insulin have been
detected in hyperinsulinemic Zucker obese
rats.30 Furthermore, an in
vitro study with femoral artery isolated from Wistar rats used a much
higher concentration of insulin (300 nmol/L) to demonstrate a
significant increase in KCl-induced vascular
contractility. This effect of insulin was attenuated by
inclusion of either an ET antagonist or ET
antiserum.24
ET has an autocrine influence on
endothelial-cell ETB receptors,
promoting a transient vasodilation through the release of
NO.31 However,
ETB-selective antagonism failed to attenuate
insulin-induced dilation. Because insulin-evoked NO generation has been
shown to be dependent on tyrosine kinase/phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase,12 13 it
is possible that although present, the transient
ETB-receptormediated NO release made a minimal
contribution. It is also possible that ET is not being generated in
substantial quantities in this vascular bed during the early
vasodilatory phase of the response. The inability of
ETB receptor blockade to produce a significant
shift in the vasodilatory pD2 confirms that NO
(and EDHF) activity is functionally independent of the
ETB receptor. Although the functional importance
of ETB receptors on VSM is thought to be
minimal, the characterization of ETB receptors
on the rat mesenteric VSM cells helps to explain the ability of BQ788
to attenuate ETB-mediated
vasoconstriction.32
Although the existence of a non-EDNO entity that induces
vasodilation through TBA-sensitive potassium conductance has been
established,33 this is the
first report of two endothelium-derived autocoids
mediating an insulin-evoked vasodilation. Little is conclusive about
EDHF except that it produces vasodilation during NOS inhibition and
that its release is probably linked to an increase in intracellular
calcium. The vasodilator effect of insulin could not be attributed to
its direct effects on VSM cells because no decrease in response to SNP
after insulin infusion was noted. Because endothelial
denudation prevented an increase in vascular tone, the involvement of
an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor is probable.
Because indomethacin did not significantly alter the
dynamics of the response, it is unlikely that a
cyclooxygenase-dependent factor was responsible.
However, because exogenous insulin may augment
cardiovascular reactivity to norepinephrine
(NE),34 it is possible that
the loss of vasodilation was due to the effects of insulin on
MTX-induced vasoconstriction. A recent study has indeed demonstrated
that incubation with a high dose (715 nmol/L) but not a low dose (715
pmol/L) of insulin increases the vasoconstrictor effect of NE in
resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive
rats.35 This effect was
attenuated by ET-receptor blockade, suggesting that enhanced NE
responses were at least partially mediated by ET. Accordingly, ET-1 has
been reported to enhance adrenergic
vasoconstriction,36
suggesting that sympathetic activation in
hyperinsulinemic states could be linked to
ET.9
This study demonstrates the importance of the
endothelium in regulating the vascular effects of
insulin. Interestingly, ET-receptor blockade maintains insulin-mediated
vasodilation in the presence of hyperinsulinemia,
suggesting a role for these agents in hyperinsulinemic
hypertension. We have also demonstrated the involvement of both EDNO
and EDHF; however, the recruitment of autacoids is dependent on the
type of vascular tissue37 as
well as on vascular
pathology.38 Furthermore,
comorbid factors such as
hypertriglyceridemia and
hypercholesterolemia19 20 21 22 23 39
may contribute to increased ET
generation,23 39 40
which in turn could affect EDNO and/or
EDHF.39 Because of this
complexity of interaction between endothelial factors,
more detailed studies of ET blockers in various vascular beds of
insulin-resistant models are required.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
This work was supported by
grants-in-aid from the Medical Research
Council of Canada to Dr
Gopalakrishnan (MT-14377) and Dr McNeill
(MT-7725). Derek Misurski and
Dr Wu are grateful for the Doctoral
Research Award from the Medical
Research Council and a Postdoctoral
Fellowship Award sponsored by
Astra-Zeneca through the Heart
and Stroke Scientific Research
Corporation of Canada,
respectively.
Received August 3, 2000;
first decision August 28, 2000;
accepted October 13, 2000.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Laakso M,
Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal
muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM.
Diabetes. 1992;41:10761083.[Abstract]
-
Baron AD.
Hemodynamic actions of insulin: review.
Am J Physiol. 1994;267:E187E202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson EA, Mark
AL. The vasodilator action of insulin: implications for the insulin
hypothesis of hypertension.
Hypertension.. 1993;21:136141.
Editorial comment.[Free Full Text]
-
Feldman RD,
Bierbrier GS. Insulin-mediated vasodilatation: impairment with
increased blood pressure and body mass.
Lancet. 1993;342:707709.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sowers JR.
Insulin-resistance and hypertension. Mol
Cell Endocrinol. 1990;74:C87C89.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Standley PR, Zhang
F, Ram JL, Zemel MB, Sowers JR. Insulin attenuates vasopressin-induced
calcium transients and a voltage-dependent calcium response in rat
vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin
Invest. 1991;88:12301236.
-
Tirupattur PR, Ram
JL, Standley PR, Sowers JR. Regulation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase gene
expression by insulin in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Am J Hypertens. 1993;6:626629.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gros R, Borkowski
KR, Feldman RD. Human insulin-mediated enhancement of vascular
beta-adrenergic responsiveness.
Hypertension. 1994;23:551555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson EA,
Hoffman RP, Balon TW, Sinkey CA, Mark AL.
Hyperinsulinemia produces both sympathetic neural
activation and vasodilatation in normal humans.
J Clin Invest. 1991;87:22462252.
-
Mimaki Y,
Kawasaki H, Okazaki M, Nakatsuma A, Araki H, Gomita Y. Involvement of
calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors in insulin-induced
vasodilatation in mesenteric resistance blood vessels of rats.
Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123:16841690.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen YL, Messina
EJ. Dilation of isolated skeletal muscle arterioles by insulin is
endothelium dependent and nitric oxide mediated.
Am J Physiol. 1996;270:H2120H2124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bertuglia S,
Colantuoni A. Insulin-induced arteriolar dilation after tyrosine kinase
and nitric oxide synthase inhibition in hamster cheek pouch
microcirculation. J Vasc Res. 1998;35:250256.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zeng G, Quon
MJ. Insulin-stimulated production of nitric oxide is
inhibited by wortmannin: direct measurement in vascular
endothelial cells. J
Clin Invest. 1996;98:894898.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Steinberg HO,
Brechtel G, Johnson A, Fineberg N, Baron AD. Insulin-mediated skeletal
muscle vasodilatation is nitric oxide dependent: a novel action of
insulin to increase nitric oxide release.
J Clin Invest. 1994;94:11721179.
-
Scherrer U,
Randin D, Vollenweider P, Vollenweider L, Nicod P. Nitric oxide release
accounts for insulins vascular effects in humans.
J Clin Invest. 1994;94:25112515.
-
Cardillo C, Nambi
SS, Kilcoyne CM, Choucair WK, Katz A, Quon MJ, Panza JA. Insulin
stimulates both ET and nitric oxide activity in the human forearm.
Circulation. 1999;100:820825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Scherrer U,
Sartori C. Insulin as a vascular and
sympathoexcitatory hormone: implications for
blood pressure regulation, insulin sensitivity, and
cardiovascular morbidity.
Circulation. 1997;96:41044113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sowers JR.
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor in normal and pathological
cardiovascular physiology.
Hypertension. 1997;29:691699.[Free Full Text]
-
Oliver FJ, de la
Rubia G, Feener EP, Lee ME, Loeken MR, Shiba T, Quertermous T, King GL.
Stimulation of ET-1 gene expression by insulin in
endothelial cells. J
Biol Chem. 1991;266:2325123256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hu RM, Levin ER,
Pedram A, Frank HJ. Insulin stimulates production and
secretion of ET from bovine endothelial cells.
Diabetes. 1993;42:351358.[Abstract]
-
Anfossi G,
Cavalot F, Massucco P, Mattiello L, Mularoni E, Hahn A, Trovati M.
Insulin influences immunoreactive ET release by human vascular smooth
muscle cells.
Metabolism. 1993;42:10811083.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ferri C, Pittoni
V, Piccoli A, Laurenti O, Cassone MR, Bellini C, Properzi G, Valesini
G, De Mattia G, Santucci A. Insulin stimulates ET-1 secretion from
human endothelial cells and modulates its circulating
levels in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 1995;80:829835.[Abstract]
-
Piatti PM, Monti
LD, Conti M, Baruffaldi L, Galli L, Phan CV, Guazzini B, Pontiroli AE,
Pozza G. Hypertriglyceridemia and
hyperinsulinemia are potent inducers of ET-1
release in humans. Diabetes. 1996;45:316321.[Abstract]
-
Nava P, Collados
MT, Masso F, Guarner V. Endothelin mediation of glucose-induced changes
in vascular contractility.
Hypertension. 1997;30:825829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Christensen KL,
Mulvany MJ. Mesenteric arcade arteries contribute substantially to
vascular resistance in conscious rats. J
Vasc Res. 1993;30:7379.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Misurski DA,
Tatchum-Talom R, McNeill JR, Gopalakrishnan V. Vanadate-evoked
vasorelaxation of the perfused rat mesenteric vascular bed of
Sprague-Dawley rats. Life Sci. 2000;67:13691379.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Quest DW,
Gopalakrishnan V, McNeill JR, Wilson TW. Effect of losartan on
angiotensin II-mediated endothelin and prostanoid excretion
in humans. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:12881294.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McDonald D,
Bailie J, Archer D, Chakravarthy U. Molecular characterization of ET
receptors and the effect of insulin on their expression in retinal
microvascular pericytes. J Cardiovasc
Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl
3):S287S289.
-
Hopfner RL,
Hasnadka RV, Wilson TW, McNeill JR, Gopalakrishnan V. Insulin increases
ET-1-evoked intracellular free calcium responses by increased ET(A)
receptor expression in rat aortic smooth muscle cells.
Diabetes. 1998;47:937944.[Abstract]
-
Laight DW, Desai
KM, Gopaul NK, Anggard EE, Carrier MJ. Special report: prooxidant
challenge in vivo provokes the onset of NIDDM in the insulin
resistant obese Zucker rat.
Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:269271.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Luscher TF. The
endothelium as a target and mediator of
cardiovascular disease: 1993 Mack Forster Award
Lecture: review. Eur J Clin
Invest. 1993;23:670685.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Deng LY, Li JS,
Schiffrin EL. Endothelin receptor subtypes in resistance arteries from
humans and rats. Cardiovasc
Res. 1995;29:532535.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Adeagbo AS
Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor:
characterization as a cytochrome P450 1A-linkedmetabolite of
arachidonic acid in perfused rat mesenteric
prearteriolar bed. Am J
Hypertens. 1997;10:763771.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gans RO, Bilo HJ,
von Maarschalkerweerd WW, Heine RJ, Nauta JJ, Donker AJ. Exogenous
insulin augments in healthy volunteers the
cardiovascular reactivity to noradrenaline
but not to angiotensin II.
J Clin Invest. 1991;88:512518.
-
Rizzoni D,
Porteri E, Piccoli A, Castellano M, Pasini G, Guelfi D, Muiesan ML,
Agabiti Rosei E, High-dose, not low-dose insulin increases the
vasoconstrictor effect of norepinephrine in spontaneously
hypertensive rats: effects of antihypertensive treatment.
J Vasc Res. 1999;36:393403.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wong-Dusting HK,
La M, Rand MJ. Endothelin-1 enhances vasoconstrictor responses to
sympathetic nerve stimulation and noradrenaline in the
rabbit ear artery. Clin Exp Pharmacol
Physiol. 1991;18:131136.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Parsons SJ, Hill
A, Waldron GJ, Plane F, Garland CJ. The relative importance of nitric
oxide and nitric oxide-independent mechanisms in acetylcholine-evoked
dilatation of the rat mesenteric bed.
Br J Pharmacol. 1994;113:12751280.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pieper GM,
Dondlinger LA. Plasma and vascular tissue arginine are decreased in
diabetes: acute arginine supplementation restores
endothelium-dependent vasodilatation by augmenting cGMP
production. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 1997;283:684691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hopfner RL,
Gopalakrishnan V. Review: endothelin: emerging role in diabetic
vascular complications.
Diabetologia. 1999;42:13831394.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lerman A, Webster
MW, Chesebro JH, Edwards WD, Wei CM, Fuster V, Burnett JC Jr.
Circulating and tissue endothelin immunoreactivity in
hypercholesterolemic pigs.
Circulation. 1993;88:29232928. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Widmer, R. H. Stewart, M. F. Young, J. E. Laurinec, G. A. Laine, and C. M. Quick
Application of local heat induces capillary recruitment in the Pallid bat wing
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
June 1, 2007;
292(6):
R2312 - R2317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Sarafidis and G. L. Bakris
Insulin and Endothelin: An Interplay Contributing to Hypertension Development?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 2007;
92(2):
379 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. V. G. Katakam, C. D. Tulbert, J. A. Snipes, B. Erdos, A. W. Miller, and D. W. Busija
Impaired insulin-induced vasodilation in small coronary arteries of Zucker obese rats is mediated by reactive oxygen species
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
February 1, 2005;
288(2):
H854 - H860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Eringa, C. D. A. Stehouwer, G. P. van Nieuw Amerongen, L. Ouwehand, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema
Vasoconstrictor effects of insulin in skeletal muscle arterioles are mediated by ERK1/2 activation in endothelium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2004;
287(5):
H2043 - H2048.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M Gardiner, D. J. R. Nunez, P. G. Baer, K. K. Brown, and T. Bennett
Regional Hemodynamic Effects of the N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Ligand, GI 262570 [(S)-2-(2-Benzoylphenylamino)-3-[4-[2-(5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-oxazol-4-yl)ethoxy]phenyl]propionic Acid], in Conscious Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
September 1, 2004;
310(3):
1226 - 1233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Eringa, C. D.A. Stehouwer, T. Merlijn, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema
Physiological concentrations of insulin induce endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction during inhibition of NOS or PI3-kinase in skeletal muscle arterioles
Cardiovasc Res,
December 1, 2002;
56(3):
464 - 471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Verma, A. W. Miller, and D. W. Busija
Endothelin Antagonism and Insulin's Vascular Effects * Response: Endothelin Antagonism and Insulin's Vascular Effects
Hypertension,
December 1, 2002;
40
(6):
e12 - e13.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Miller, C. Tulbert, M. Puskar, and D. W. Busija
Enhanced Endothelin Activity Prevents Vasodilation to Insulin in Insulin Resistance
Hypertension,
July 1, 2002;
40(1):
78 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. V d'Uscio, M. Barton, S. Shaw, and T. F Luscher
Chronic ETA receptor blockade prevents endothelial dysfunction of small arteries in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
Cardiovasc Res,
February 1, 2002;
53(2):
487 - 495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Misurski, R. L. Hopfner, and V. Gopalakrishnan
Attenuated Agonist Evoked Vasoconstrictor Responses in the Perfused Mesenteric Vascular Bed of Streptozotocin Diabetic Rats
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
November 1, 2001;
226(10):
940 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|