Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2001;37:1298-1302

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misurski, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalakrishnan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misurski, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalakrishnan, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Other Vascular biology

(Hypertension. 2001;37:1298.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Insulin-Induced Biphasic Responses in Rat Mesenteric Vascular Bed

Role of Endothelin

Derek A. Misurski; Sheng-Qian Wu; J. Robert McNeill; Thomas W. Wilson; Venkat Gopalakrishnan

From the Department of Pharmacology and the Cardiovascular Risk Factor Reduction Unit, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Correspondence to Venkat Gopalakrishnan, PhD, Department of Pharmacology and the CRFRU, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5 Canada. E-mail Gopal{at}Sask.Usask.Ca


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The vasodilatory capacity of insulin has been widely reported, yet some investigators have not noted this effect. Because insulin has been shown to enhance endothelin release, we speculated that endothelin could be attenuating insulin-evoked vasodilation. We examined the effect of ex vivo insulin perfusion on vascular resistance by using the Sprague-Dawley rat mesenteric vascular bed. In methoxamine-preconstricted preparations, insulin (3.0 pmol/L to 10 nmol/L) evoked a concentration-dependent decrease in perfusion pressure (PP) with a maximal response of 42.0±9.2%, whereas continuous exposure to 10 nmol/L insulin induced a 51.8±3.5% relaxation. Further exposure to 10 nmol/L insulin resulted in the generation of endothelin and a subsequent loss of the vasodilatory response. Indomethacin had no effect on vascular responses. The vasodilatory response was significantly inhibited by nitric oxide synthase inhibition (20.5±4.2%; P<0.01) and calcium-activated potassium channel blockade (28.5±3.7%; P<0.05). Endothelial denudation attenuated the vasodilatory component (20.3±7.1%; P<0.01) and altered the biphasic pattern of the response. The decline in insulin-evoked vasodilation was significantly prevented by an endothelin-A antagonist (BQ123), an endothelin-B antagonist (BQ788), and nonselective endothelin blockade with both BQ123 and BQ788. These results demonstrate that the endothelium is intimately involved in regulating the vascular response to insulin. Insulin promotes the release of nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. During sustained exposure to higher concentrations, this vasodilatory effect is countered by the pathological generation of endothelin. Endothelin receptor blockade facilitates the maintenance of vasodilation despite high insulin concentrations.


Key Words: insulin • nitric oxide • vasodilation • endothelin • endothelium • mesenteric arteries


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The ability of insulin to induce vasodilation is integral to the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow and glucose delivery.1 2 3 Insulin-mediated vasodilation is impaired in insulin-resistant patients, suggesting a close relation between insulin resistance and hypertension.4 5 However, despite the potential significance, the mechanism(s) underlying direct vascular effects of insulin remain controversial.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Several studies in animals and humans attribute the vasodilatory effect of insulin to enhanced generation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (EDNO).2 11 12 13 14 15 16 On the contrary, there have been reports supporting an endothelium-independent mechanism.5 6 7 8 9 10 Incubation with insulin has been shown to reduce cytosolic-free calcium levels6 and to increase the expression of the sodium pump gene, leading to hyperpolarization of vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells.7 Insulin enhancement of vascular ß-adrenergic responsiveness has also been reported in normotensive animals and humans.8 9 In the perfused rat mesenteric vascular bed (MVB), insulin-evoked vasodilation has been linked to the activation of calcitonin gene–related peptide receptors on the VSM cells.10 Interestingly, these investigators noted that endothelial denudation of the MVB enhanced vasodilator responses to insulin, implicating the release of a contracting factor from the endothelium.10 Moreover, a few reports have demonstrated the lack of a vasodilator response to insulin.17 18 Therefore, an explanation that insulin is simultaneously promoting the release of a contractile substance countering the release of vasodilator factor(s) is indeed possible, because several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that insulin promotes endothelin-1 (ET-1) generation in the vascular endothelium.19 20 21 22 23 24 This activity may account for the paradoxical vascular effects of insulin. To assess this hypothesis, we investigated the endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent effects of insulin on the vasculature. The perfused rat MVB was used because it is a well-established representation of vascular resistance function.25


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
MVB Perfusion
Experiments were performed with 80 male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River) weighing 410 to 515 g. Animals were killed under pentobarbital anesthesia (65 mg/kg IP). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the university animal care committee. The vascular bed was removed, cannulated, and perfused as previously described.26 An equilibration period of 30 minutes was allowed to stabilize the baseline. This was followed by perfusion of a Krebs solution containing the {alpha}1-agonist methoxamine (MTX, 70 µmol/L), either in the presence or absence of the following agents: (1) a combination of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 100 µmol/L) and NG-nitro-L-arginine-methylester (L-NAME, 100 µmol/L) to maximally inhibit the enzyme; (2) a calcium-activated potassium channel blocker (KCa), which serves as an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor [EDHF] blocker, (tetrabutylammonium [TBA], 0.5 mmol/L); (3) a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (indomethacin, 10 µmol/L); (4) an ETA receptor blocker (BQ123,100 nmol/L); (5) an ETB receptor blocker (BQ788, 100 nmol/L); and (6) a combination of ETA and ETB receptor blockers (BQ123 and BQ788, 100 nmol/L each). Denudation was accomplished as previously described.26 The MTX-induced elevation in baseline PP was allowed to stabilize for 20 to 30 minutes before the remainder of the protocol was conducted. After 20 to 30 minutes, a maximal dose of acetylcholine (ACh) was injected into the perfusate. A washout was then allowed before insulin perfusion was initiated. On stabilization of the MTX-constricted baseline, insulin was added to the perfusate in concentrations of 3.0 pmol/L, 10 pmol/L, 30 pmol/L, 100 pmol/L, 300 pmol/L...3.0 µmol/L sequentially, and each concentration was perfused for 4 minutes, resulting in a cumulative response. Single concentrations of insulin (1.0 nmol/L or 10 nmol/L) and insulin-derived growth factor (IGF)-1 (1.0 nmol/L and 10 nmol/L) or MTX alone was also included in the perfusate over a period of 1 hour (n=4). To assess the postinsulin vasodilation capacity of the VSM, a maximal dose of a direct NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), was injected.

Assessment of Endothelin Generation
To assess whether the loss of insulin-induced vasodilation was attributable to ET, we collected the MVB perfusate for 10 minutes during both the baseline and MTX equilibration periods. After this, perfusate was collected every 10 minutes for 1 hour during exposure to fixed concentrations of insulin, IGF-1, or MTX as a control. The ET level in the perfusate was measured with a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit as previously described.27

Reagents
MTX, TBA, L-NNA, L-NAME, indomethacin, ACh, SNP, and insulin (human USP) were all purchased from Sigma. Alcohol was used to dissolve indomethacin at a final concentration of 1/2000 and was added to all solutions. BQ123 and BQ788 were obtained from American Peptide. Krebs solution salts were obtained from BDH. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was obtained from Biomedica Gruppe. Amprep Octadecyl C18 columns were from Amersham.

Statistical Analysis
Cumulative concentration-response curves were analyzed individually. The results are expressed as the percentage of vasodilation of MTX-evoked contraction. The potency of insulin-induced vasodilation was expressed as the negative logarithm of the half-maximal response (pD2 value). Both maximal responses and the pD2 were expressed as mean±SEM. Comparison of mean values among various groups was performed by ANOVA methodology (Superanova program–SAS Institute). Simultaneous multiple comparisons were examined by Scheffé’s F test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular Responses to Perfusion of Insulin
Perfusion of the MVB with MTX resulted in a vasoconstriction and an elevation in the PP (49.0±5.1 mm Hg). In MTX-preconstricted preparations, cumulative insulin perfusion resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in PP. At concentrations of insulin >10 nmol/L, the decrease in PP gradually diminished such that at a maximal concentration of insulin (3 µmol/L), there was no decrease in PP. A representative tracing from a single experiment is shown in Figure 1. The pD2 value for the insulin-mediated vasodilation was 10.3±0.1 (-log mol/L), and the maximal relaxation of MTX-induced PP was 42.0±9.2% (Table). The continuous perfusion of a fixed concentration of insulin (1.0 nmol/L) induced vasodilation (31.0±2.2%) shortly after being exposed to the MVB, whereas perfusion of insulin (10 nmol/L) produced a larger relaxation of 51.8±3.5% (P<0.01). By comparison, the maximal relaxation response attained with ACh and SNP as vasodilatory agents were 93.0±7.8% and 98.4±4.4%, respectively. The basal ET level in the perfusate was 46.5±7.2 pg/50 mL. There was no significant change in ET levels when MTX alone was perfused for a period of 1 hour (Figure 2A). Although continuous perfusion of a fixed concentration of insulin (1 nmol/L) did not evoke an increase in ET production after 1 hour (data not shown), insulin (10 nmol/L) significantly increased (P<0.01) ET generation at a 20-minute time period and thereafter (Figure 2A). This was accompanied by a gradual loss of the vasodilatory response, as depicted in the representative tracing of a single experiment (see Figure 2B). The residual vasodilation after perfusion of 10 nmol/L insulin for 1 hour was 5.6±3.2%. Perfusion of IGF-1 for up to 1 hour did not affect the changes in PP to MTX (data not shown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative tracing of cumulative vasodilator response to perfusion with increasing concentrations of insulin (3.0 pmol/L to 3 µmol/L) in rat isolated perfused MVB. Each arrow represents end of 4-minute perfusion. Increase in vascular tone was maintained by perfusion with 70 µmol/L MTX.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of Treatment on pD2 and Percent Maximal Vasodilation of MTX-Induced (70 µmol/L) Tone Produced by Insulin in Perfused MVB of Sprague-Dawley Rats



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, ET-1 content in MVB perfusate collected at 10-minute intervals. Perfusate was collected during baseline perfusion and in presence of MTX (70 µmol/L). Subsequently, MVB was perfused with MTX and insulin (10 nmol/L) containing buffer (solid squares) or continued on MTX perfusion alone. Perfusate was collected consecutively at 10-minute intervals for 60 minutes. Insulin perfusion induced substantial increase in ET generation relative to MTX control (** P<0.01). B, First representative tracing demonstrates effect of insulin (10 nmol/L) on MTX-induced elevation in MVB PP. Second tracing represents effect of insulin (1 nmol/L); third tracing represents no alteration as seen in response to IGF-1 (10 nmol/L).

Effects of Treatment on Insulin Perfusion
Inclusion of inhibitors of endothelium-mediated vasodilation and contraction in the perfusion solution did not have any significant effect on the MTX-induced increase in PP. Endothelial denudation (P<0.01), NOS inhibition (P<0.05), and TBA (P<0.05) reduced the maximal vasodilator responses to ACh, whereas neither indomethacin nor ET antagonists had any effect. Endothelial denudation significantly attenuated (P<0.01) insulin-induced vasodilation (Figure 3A), resulting in both a decrease in the maximal vasodilation (P<0.01) and a right shift in the concentration-response curve (P<0.01; Table). NOS inhibition (P<0.01) and TBA (P<0.05; Figure 3B) both attenuated insulin-evoked maximal dilation (Table). ETA and nonselective ET-receptor blockade prevented the loss of vasodilation associated with insulin concentrations starting at 10 nmol/L (Figure 3C). Neither selective ET-receptor blockade nor nonselective ET blockade produced any significant change in the potency or maximal effect of insulin-evoked vasodilation (Table). Maximal SNP responses did not differ among the groups.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Log dose-response curves for relaxation of MTX-preconstricted MVB by insulin. Insulin-evoked vasodilation in endothelium-intact preparation is represented by open circle. A, Endothelium-denuded preparation is represented by closed circle. B, NOS inhibition with L-NAME and L-NNA (100 µmol/L each) is represented by open triangle. Calcium-activated potassium channel blockade with TBA (0.5 mmol/L) is represented by closed triangle. C, ETA receptor blockade with BQ123 (100 nmol/L) is represented by open square. ETA and ETB receptor blockade with BQ123 and BQ788 (100 nmol/L each) is represented by closed square. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs respective control).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of this investigation demonstrate a concentration-dependent effect of insulin on vascular reactivity and that in the presence of higher concentrations, the duration of exposure is of consequence. The ability of NOS inhibition and KCa blockade to attenuate the initial vasodilatory response suggests the involvement of EDNO and EDHF. Although at higher concentrations, insulin initially produces a more profound vasodilation than at lower doses, sustained exposure stimulates the production and release of ET, which diminishes the preceding vasodilation. Subsequently, ET-receptor blockade maintains vasodilation. Because the MVB contributes significantly to the resistance function of the vasculature,25 the present study supports the notion that hyperinsulinemic-evoked imbalances in endothelium-derived factors may contribute to insulin-resistant hypertension. A recent investigation by Cardillo et al16 also demonstrated the ability of ET-receptor blockade to increase forearm blood flow during hyperinsulinemia.

Insulin has been shown to have profound effects on the ET system, promoting the release of ET-119 20 21 22 23 24 and upregulating ET receptors on VSM cells.28 29 Incubation of bovine aortic endothelial cells with insulin in vitro increases the production and release of ET-1 within 10 minutes, an effect that was maximal within 1 to 2 hours.19 20 Our results are consistent with these in vitro observations. Insulin also increases ET-1 production in cultured human VSM cells,21 supporting the finding of enhanced ET release in both healthy as well as obese non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus human subjects.22 23 The concentration of insulin (10 nmol/L) that evoked significant ET generation in the present study may be relevant to in vivo situations because similar concentrations of plasma insulin have been detected in hyperinsulinemic Zucker obese rats.30 Furthermore, an in vitro study with femoral artery isolated from Wistar rats used a much higher concentration of insulin (300 nmol/L) to demonstrate a significant increase in KCl-induced vascular contractility. This effect of insulin was attenuated by inclusion of either an ET antagonist or ET antiserum.24

ET has an autocrine influence on endothelial-cell ETB receptors, promoting a transient vasodilation through the release of NO.31 However, ETB-selective antagonism failed to attenuate insulin-induced dilation. Because insulin-evoked NO generation has been shown to be dependent on tyrosine kinase/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase,12 13 it is possible that although present, the transient ETB-receptor–mediated NO release made a minimal contribution. It is also possible that ET is not being generated in substantial quantities in this vascular bed during the early vasodilatory phase of the response. The inability of ETB receptor blockade to produce a significant shift in the vasodilatory pD2 confirms that NO (and EDHF) activity is functionally independent of the ETB receptor. Although the functional importance of ETB receptors on VSM is thought to be minimal, the characterization of ETB receptors on the rat mesenteric VSM cells helps to explain the ability of BQ788 to attenuate ETB-mediated vasoconstriction.32

Although the existence of a non-EDNO entity that induces vasodilation through TBA-sensitive potassium conductance has been established,33 this is the first report of two endothelium-derived autocoids mediating an insulin-evoked vasodilation. Little is conclusive about EDHF except that it produces vasodilation during NOS inhibition and that its release is probably linked to an increase in intracellular calcium. The vasodilator effect of insulin could not be attributed to its direct effects on VSM cells because no decrease in response to SNP after insulin infusion was noted. Because endothelial denudation prevented an increase in vascular tone, the involvement of an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor is probable. Because indomethacin did not significantly alter the dynamics of the response, it is unlikely that a cyclooxygenase-dependent factor was responsible. However, because exogenous insulin may augment cardiovascular reactivity to norepinephrine (NE),34 it is possible that the loss of vasodilation was due to the effects of insulin on MTX-induced vasoconstriction. A recent study has indeed demonstrated that incubation with a high dose (715 nmol/L) but not a low dose (715 pmol/L) of insulin increases the vasoconstrictor effect of NE in resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats.35 This effect was attenuated by ET-receptor blockade, suggesting that enhanced NE responses were at least partially mediated by ET. Accordingly, ET-1 has been reported to enhance adrenergic vasoconstriction,36 suggesting that sympathetic activation in hyperinsulinemic states could be linked to ET.9

This study demonstrates the importance of the endothelium in regulating the vascular effects of insulin. Interestingly, ET-receptor blockade maintains insulin-mediated vasodilation in the presence of hyperinsulinemia, suggesting a role for these agents in hyperinsulinemic hypertension. We have also demonstrated the involvement of both EDNO and EDHF; however, the recruitment of autacoids is dependent on the type of vascular tissue37 as well as on vascular pathology.38 Furthermore, comorbid factors such as hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia19 20 21 22 23 39 may contribute to increased ET generation,23 39 40 which in turn could affect EDNO and/or EDHF.39 Because of this complexity of interaction between endothelial factors, more detailed studies of ET blockers in various vascular beds of insulin-resistant models are required.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Medical Research Council of Canada to Dr Gopalakrishnan (MT-14377) and Dr McNeill (MT-7725). Derek Misurski and Dr Wu are grateful for the Doctoral Research Award from the Medical Research Council and a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award sponsored by Astra-Zeneca through the Heart and Stroke Scientific Research Corporation of Canada, respectively.

Received August 3, 2000; first decision August 28, 2000; accepted October 13, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1992;41:1076–1083.[Abstract]

2. Baron AD. Hemodynamic actions of insulin: review. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:E187–E202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Anderson EA, Mark AL. The vasodilator action of insulin: implications for the insulin hypothesis of hypertension. Hypertension.. 1993;21:136–141. Editorial comment.[Free Full Text]

4. Feldman RD, Bierbrier GS. Insulin-mediated vasodilatation: impairment with increased blood pressure and body mass. Lancet. 1993;342:707–709.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Sowers JR. Insulin-resistance and hypertension. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1990;74:C87–C89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Standley PR, Zhang F, Ram JL, Zemel MB, Sowers JR. Insulin attenuates vasopressin-induced calcium transients and a voltage-dependent calcium response in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1230–1236.

7. Tirupattur PR, Ram JL, Standley PR, Sowers JR. Regulation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase gene expression by insulin in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Hypertens. 1993;6:626–629.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Gros R, Borkowski KR, Feldman RD. Human insulin-mediated enhancement of vascular beta-adrenergic responsiveness. Hypertension. 1994;23:551–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Anderson EA, Hoffman RP, Balon TW, Sinkey CA, Mark AL. Hyperinsulinemia produces both sympathetic neural activation and vasodilatation in normal humans. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:2246–2252.

10. Mimaki Y, Kawasaki H, Okazaki M, Nakatsuma A, Araki H, Gomita Y. Involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors in insulin-induced vasodilatation in mesenteric resistance blood vessels of rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123:1684–1690.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Chen YL, Messina EJ. Dilation of isolated skeletal muscle arterioles by insulin is endothelium dependent and nitric oxide mediated. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:H2120–H2124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bertuglia S, Colantuoni A. Insulin-induced arteriolar dilation after tyrosine kinase and nitric oxide synthase inhibition in hamster cheek pouch microcirculation. J Vasc Res. 1998;35:250–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Zeng G, Quon MJ. Insulin-stimulated production of nitric oxide is inhibited by wortmannin: direct measurement in vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:894–898.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Steinberg HO, Brechtel G, Johnson A, Fineberg N, Baron AD. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilatation is nitric oxide dependent: a novel action of insulin to increase nitric oxide release. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1172–1179.

15. Scherrer U, Randin D, Vollenweider P, Vollenweider L, Nicod P. Nitric oxide release accounts for insulin’s vascular effects in humans. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:2511–2515.

16. Cardillo C, Nambi SS, Kilcoyne CM, Choucair WK, Katz A, Quon MJ, Panza JA. Insulin stimulates both ET and nitric oxide activity in the human forearm. Circulation. 1999;100:820–825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Scherrer U, Sartori C. Insulin as a vascular and sympathoexcitatory hormone: implications for blood pressure regulation, insulin sensitivity, and cardiovascular morbidity. Circulation. 1997;96:4104–4113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Sowers JR. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor in normal and pathological cardiovascular physiology. Hypertension. 1997;29:691–699.[Free Full Text]

19. Oliver FJ, de la Rubia G, Feener EP, Lee ME, Loeken MR, Shiba T, Quertermous T, King GL. Stimulation of ET-1 gene expression by insulin in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:23251–23256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hu RM, Levin ER, Pedram A, Frank HJ. Insulin stimulates production and secretion of ET from bovine endothelial cells. Diabetes. 1993;42:351–358.[Abstract]

21. Anfossi G, Cavalot F, Massucco P, Mattiello L, Mularoni E, Hahn A, Trovati M. Insulin influences immunoreactive ET release by human vascular smooth muscle cells. Metabolism. 1993;42:1081–1083.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Ferri C, Pittoni V, Piccoli A, Laurenti O, Cassone MR, Bellini C, Properzi G, Valesini G, De Mattia G, Santucci A. Insulin stimulates ET-1 secretion from human endothelial cells and modulates its circulating levels in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:829–835.[Abstract]

23. Piatti PM, Monti LD, Conti M, Baruffaldi L, Galli L, Phan CV, Guazzini B, Pontiroli AE, Pozza G. Hypertriglyceridemia and hyperinsulinemia are potent inducers of ET-1 release in humans. Diabetes. 1996;45:316–321.[Abstract]

24. Nava P, Collados MT, Masso F, Guarner V. Endothelin mediation of glucose-induced changes in vascular contractility. Hypertension. 1997;30:825–829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Christensen KL, Mulvany MJ. Mesenteric arcade arteries contribute substantially to vascular resistance in conscious rats. J Vasc Res. 1993;30:73–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Misurski DA, Tatchum-Talom R, McNeill JR, Gopalakrishnan V. Vanadate-evoked vasorelaxation of the perfused rat mesenteric vascular bed of Sprague-Dawley rats. Life Sci. 2000;67:1369–1379.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Quest DW, Gopalakrishnan V, McNeill JR, Wilson TW. Effect of losartan on angiotensin II-mediated endothelin and prostanoid excretion in humans. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:1288–1294.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. McDonald D, Bailie J, Archer D, Chakravarthy U. Molecular characterization of ET receptors and the effect of insulin on their expression in retinal microvascular pericytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl 3):S287–S289.

29. Hopfner RL, Hasnadka RV, Wilson TW, McNeill JR, Gopalakrishnan V. Insulin increases ET-1-evoked intracellular free calcium responses by increased ET(A) receptor expression in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Diabetes. 1998;47:937–944.[Abstract]

30. Laight DW, Desai KM, Gopaul NK, Anggard EE, Carrier MJ. Special report: prooxidant challenge in vivo provokes the onset of NIDDM in the insulin resistant obese Zucker rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:269–271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Luscher TF. The endothelium as a target and mediator of cardiovascular disease: 1993 Mack Forster Award Lecture: review. Eur J Clin Invest. 1993;23:670–685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Deng LY, Li JS, Schiffrin EL. Endothelin receptor subtypes in resistance arteries from humans and rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;29:532–535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Adeagbo AS Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor: characterization as a cytochrome P450 1A-linkedmetabolite of arachidonic acid in perfused rat mesenteric prearteriolar bed. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:763–771.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Gans RO, Bilo HJ, von Maarschalkerweerd WW, Heine RJ, Nauta JJ, Donker AJ. Exogenous insulin augments in healthy volunteers the cardiovascular reactivity to noradrenaline but not to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:512–518.

35. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Piccoli A, Castellano M, Pasini G, Guelfi D, Muiesan ML, Agabiti Rosei E, High-dose, not low-dose insulin increases the vasoconstrictor effect of norepinephrine in spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of antihypertensive treatment. J Vasc Res. 1999;36:393–403.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Wong-Dusting HK, La M, Rand MJ. Endothelin-1 enhances vasoconstrictor responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation and noradrenaline in the rabbit ear artery. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1991;18:131–136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Parsons SJ, Hill A, Waldron GJ, Plane F, Garland CJ. The relative importance of nitric oxide and nitric oxide-independent mechanisms in acetylcholine-evoked dilatation of the rat mesenteric bed. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;113:1275–1280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Pieper GM, Dondlinger LA. Plasma and vascular tissue arginine are decreased in diabetes: acute arginine supplementation restores endothelium-dependent vasodilatation by augmenting cGMP production. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;283:684–691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Hopfner RL, Gopalakrishnan V. Review: endothelin: emerging role in diabetic vascular complications. Diabetologia. 1999;42:1383–1394.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Lerman A, Webster MW, Chesebro JH, Edwards WD, Wei CM, Fuster V, Burnett JC Jr. Circulating and tissue endothelin immunoreactivity in hypercholesterolemic pigs. Circulation. 1993;88:2923–2928. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Widmer, R. H. Stewart, M. F. Young, J. E. Laurinec, G. A. Laine, and C. M. Quick
Application of local heat induces capillary recruitment in the Pallid bat wing
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2312 - R2317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. A. Sarafidis and G. L. Bakris
Insulin and Endothelin: An Interplay Contributing to Hypertension Development?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. V. G. Katakam, C. D. Tulbert, J. A. Snipes, B. Erdos, A. W. Miller, and D. W. Busija
Impaired insulin-induced vasodilation in small coronary arteries of Zucker obese rats is mediated by reactive oxygen species
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H854 - H860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. C. Eringa, C. D. A. Stehouwer, G. P. van Nieuw Amerongen, L. Ouwehand, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema
Vasoconstrictor effects of insulin in skeletal muscle arterioles are mediated by ERK1/2 activation in endothelium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2043 - H2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. M Gardiner, D. J. R. Nunez, P. G. Baer, K. K. Brown, and T. Bennett
Regional Hemodynamic Effects of the N-(2-Benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Ligand, GI 262570 [(S)-2-(2-Benzoylphenylamino)-3-[4-[2-(5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-oxazol-4-yl)ethoxy]phenyl]propionic Acid], in Conscious Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2004; 310(3): 1226 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
E. C. Eringa, C. D.A. Stehouwer, T. Merlijn, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema
Physiological concentrations of insulin induce endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction during inhibition of NOS or PI3-kinase in skeletal muscle arterioles
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2002; 56(3): 464 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Verma, A. W. Miller, and D. W. Busija
Endothelin Antagonism and Insulin's Vascular Effects * Response: Endothelin Antagonism and Insulin's Vascular Effects
Hypertension, December 1, 2002; 40 (6): e12 - e13.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. W. Miller, C. Tulbert, M. Puskar, and D. W. Busija
Enhanced Endothelin Activity Prevents Vasodilation to Insulin in Insulin Resistance
Hypertension, July 1, 2002; 40(1): 78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. V d'Uscio, M. Barton, S. Shaw, and T. F Luscher
Chronic ETA receptor blockade prevents endothelial dysfunction of small arteries in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2002; 53(2): 487 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp Biol MedHome page
D. A. Misurski, R. L. Hopfner, and V. Gopalakrishnan
Attenuated Agonist Evoked Vasoconstrictor Responses in the Perfused Mesenteric Vascular Bed of Streptozotocin Diabetic Rats
Exp Biol Med, November 1, 2001; 226(10): 940 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misurski, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalakrishnan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misurski, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalakrishnan, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Other Vascular biology