This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Taylor, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Taylor, J. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB PHENYLEPHRINE Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation

(Hypertension. 2001;37:1362.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Quantification of Mechanical and Neural Components of Vagal Baroreflex in Humans

Brian E. Hunt; Lisamarie Fahy; William B. Farquhar; J. Andrew Taylor

From the Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Research and Training Institute; and Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to J. Andrew Taylor, PhD, Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Research and Training Institute, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, 1200 Centre St, Boston, MA 02131. E-mail ataylor{at}mail.hrca.harvard.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abstract—Traditionally, arterial baroreflex control of vagal neural outflow is quantified by heart period responses to falling and/or rising arterial pressures (ms/mm Hg). However, it is arterial pressure–dependent stretch of barosensory vessels that determines afferent baroreceptor responses, which, in turn, generate appropriate efferent cardiac vagal outflow. Thus, mechanical transduction of pressure into barosensory vessel stretch and neural transduction of stretch into vagal outflow are key steps in baroreflex regulation that determine the conventional integrated input-output relation. We developed a novel technique for direct estimation of gain in both mechanical and neural components of integrated cardiac vagal baroreflex control. Concurrent, beat-by-beat measures of arterial pressures (Finapres), carotid diameters (B-mode ultrasonography), and R-R intervals (ECG lead II) were made during bolus vasoactive drug infusions (modified Oxford technique) in 16 healthy humans. The systolic carotid diameter/pressure relationship (r²=0.79±0.008, mean±SEM) provided a gain estimate of dynamic mechanical transduction of pressure into a baroreflex stimulus. The R-R interval/systolic diameter relationship (r²=0.77±0.009) provided a gain estimate of afferent-efferent neural transduction of baroreflex stimulus into a vagal response. Variance between repeated measures for both estimates was no different than that for standard gain (P>0.40). Moreover, in these subjects, the simple product of the 2 estimates almost equaled standard baroreflex gain (ms/mm Hg=0.98x+2.27; r²=0.93, P=0.001). This technique provides reliable information on key baroreflex components not distinguished by standard assessments and gives insight to dynamic mechanical and neural events during acute changes in arterial pressure.

Key Words: arterial pressure • carotid arteries • ultrasonography

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Depressed baroreflex sensitivity is associated with hypertension,¹ heart disease,² diabetes, and other pathophysiological states,³ attesting that appropriate baroreflex regulation of autonomic outflow is crucial to maintenance of cardiovascular health and homeostasis. Traditionally, cardiac-vagal baroreflex sensitivity or gain has been quantified by the magnitude of heart period responses to falling and/or rising arterial pressure (ie, R-R interval/ systolic pressure).⁴ This estimate represents an integrated input-output relation and provides broad insight to baroreflex function. However, it has long been recognized that baroreceptors respond to deformation not pressure per se. Early in the last century, Sollman and Brown⁵ reported that stretch of the carotid artery produces bradycardia and hypotension in dogs. Similar reflex responses in humans derive from proportionalities between changes in carotid diameter and carotid nerve firing⁶ and between the R-R interval and the frequency of afferent carotid sinus nerve activation.⁷ Thus, mechanical transduction of arterial pressure into carotid stretch and neural transduction of carotid stretch into vagal outflow are the key steps in baroreflex regulation that determine the conventional integrated input-output relation.

Both mechanical transduction of pressure and neural transduction of stretch may be profoundly important in pathophysiological conditions. For example, greater carotid vascular stiffness in human hypertension¹ would effectively desensitize baroreceptors and depress baroreflex autonomic regulation. Alternatively, in the absence of structural changes, cardiac vagal deficiencies, which can occur early in the progression of diabetes⁸ and may characterize orthostatic intolerance,³ would reduce neural transduction and blunt baroreflex responses to pressure decreases. However, elucidating either of these processes in humans is difficult. Static measures of basal arterial stiffness can be obtained and are associated with integrated baroreflex gain,^{1 9} yet they provide no information on dynamic vascular responses to rapid pressure changes¹⁰ that usually characterize baroreflex activation. Measures of the neural component of the baroreflex arc are exceedingly rare, because of the difficulty of obtaining recordings of afferent baroreceptor or efferent vagal nervous activity in humans. Nonetheless, the sparse information supports a close relation between baroreflex stimulus and vagal response. Changes in carotid diameter within the cardiac cycle produce proportionate firing of afferent baroreceptive fibers,⁶ direct stimulation of these afferents produces proportional R-R interval responses,⁷ and R-R interval changes proportionally with the rate of vagus nerve stimulation.¹¹ These 3 observations suggest that the relation between barosensory vessel diameter and R-R interval may represent the afferent-efferent neural baroreflex arc in humans.

We set out to develop a technique for direct, minimally invasive estimation of both mechanical and neural components of the integrated cardiac-vagal baroreflex in humans. On the basis of the observations outlined above, we measured arterial pressures, common carotid diameters, and R-R intervals during a pharmacological arterial baroreflex stimulus to broaden our ability to assess baroreflex function. Our aim was to determine whether this novel approach of concurrent beat-by-beat measures provides reliable estimates of not only the standard integrated baroreflex gain but also the mechanical transduction of arterial pressure into barosensory vessel stretch and the neural transduction of barosensory vessel stretch into autonomic outflow, facets of baroreflex function difficult to ascertain in humans. Furthermore, we wanted to determine whether application of this technique to physiological and pathophysiological states characterized by alterations in baroreflex function would give unique insight to cardiovascular autonomic regulation in humans.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Eleven men and 5 women age 20 to 31 years were studied under supine resting conditions. All subjects were free of overt autonomic or cardiovascular disease and had a body mass index <26 kg/m² and resting brachial blood pressures <135/85 mm Hg. The Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Institutional Review Board approved the experimental protocol. The nature, purpose, and risks of the study were explained to each subject before written informed consent was obtained in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Protocol
Arterial Pressure and R-R Interval
Beat-by-beat arterial pressures from a finger photoplethysmograph (Finapres, Datex-Ohmeda) and a standard 3-lead ECG were recorded continuously. An oscillometric blood pressure system on the contralateral arm (Dinamap) was used to calibrate the Finapres against a standard brachial measure.

Carotid Ultrasonography
Longitudinal B-mode images of a common carotid artery, 1 cm below the carotid bulb, were obtained using a high-resolution linear array transducer (7.5 MHz, Hewlett-Packard). The transducer was placed at 90° to the vessel so that the near and far wall interfaces were clearly discernible. Commercially available hardware (PCI Frame Grabber, Datax) and software (CVI Acquisition, Information Integrity) acquired 30 Hz images to the computer triggered from the R wave of the ECG. Fifteen consecutive carotid images were acquired with each trigger to approximate at least one third the cardiac cycle (ie, 500 ms of a 1500-ms R-R interval or 40-bpm heart rate) and, therefore, encompass both end-diastolic and peak-systolic carotid diameters.

Pharmacological Baroreflex Engagement
We used the modified Oxford technique, which involves a bolus injection of 100 µg of sodium nitroprusside followed in 60 seconds by a bolus of 150 µg of phenylephrine hydrochloride. Responses of a representative subject are shown in the top panels of Figure 1. This technique generally produces an initial 15 mm Hg drop in arterial pressure followed by an 15 mm Hg rise in pressure above resting supine levels.¹² In this particular subject, arterial pressure only increased 8 mm Hg above baseline, probably because of effective buffering by pronounced lengthening of the R-R interval. The advantage of the modified Oxford technique is that it produces a longer and greater pressure rise than the more commonly used Oxford technique (phenylephrine alone). Moreover, arterial baroreflex gain does not differ if pressure is raised from lower compared with resting levels¹³ ; thus, acquisition of ultrasound images (ie, carotid diameters) once every 2 seconds did not compromise the ability to make robust baroreflex gain estimates with the modified Oxford technique (see below, Baroreflex Gain Estimates). The drug injection sequence was repeated twice to assess test-retest reliability of baroreflex indices. Trials were separated by at least 15 minutes to allow full recovery to baseline. A total of 3 trials were necessary to obtain adequate image quality for at least 2 trials.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Arterial pressure response to the modified Oxford technique and the corresponding changes in carotid diameter and heart period (top). Association between R-wave trigger, raw (open circles) and smoothed (solid line) carotid diameters, and arterial pressure wave (bottom).

Data Analysis
Hemodynamic Data
Beat-by-beat arterial pressure and ECG waveforms were digitized to computer at 500 Hz for subsequent offline analysis with signal processing software (WINDAQ, Dataq). R-R intervals were derived from the time difference between marks placed on the peak of the R waves. Systolic and diastolic pressures were derived from the maximum and the minimum of the beat-by-beat pressure waveform.

Carotid Diameter
We used image analysis software (CVI Analysis, Information Integrity) closely conforming to that described in detail previously.¹⁴ Briefly, several points in proximity to the edges of the near and far walls were selected. The software fit a spline that contained 100 points to each set of preliminary edge points. The direction locally perpendicular to each spline point was calculated, and the image was interpolated for 6 pixels in either direction perpendicular to the spline. The location along the interpolated line with the largest sum of first and second derivatives was then chosen as the best edge point. This process was repeated for each spline point along the 2 edges. Edge points, which represent weak edges (ie, points selected at edges with <20% of the maximum sum of the intensity derivatives of all edge points), were replaced by linear connections between the nearest strong edge points. The 2 sets of edge points extracted by the above procedure were modeled as a pair of parabolas, according to a least square error fit, in which the 2 parabolas are constrained to have the same curvature. The diameter of the artery was calculated as the distance between the 2 parabolas. The user-selected preliminary edge points were reused for successive images and could be moved as a group to compensate for translational motion of the artery. This reduces variance in the time series of diameter measurements by as much as a factor of 5 compared with standard ultrasonic calipers.¹⁵

Association of Carotid Diameters and Hemodynamic Data
To minimize measurement error in carotid diameter estimation, we used a 3-diameter moving average (Figure 1, bottom panels). Custom software associated diameters to appropriate pressures and R-R intervals. Within a cardiac cycle, we associated systolic pressure with the largest carotid diameter and diastolic pressure with the smallest diameter before systole. We associated the R-R interval with systolic pressure and systolic diameter after appropriately accounting for baroreflex delays; pressure and diameter were associated with the concurrent R-R interval at heart periods >800 ms and the subsequent R-R interval at heart periods between 500 and 800 ms.¹⁶

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Baroreflex Gain Estimates
Gain Calculations
Although heart rate is often used to characterize vagally mediated responses to baroreceptor input, we used the R-R interval, which is most linearly related to vagal outflow.¹¹ We averaged systolic pressures, carotid diameters, and R-R intervals across 3 mm Hg systolic pressure increments, or bins, to account for variations related to ventilation and measurement error (Figure 2).¹² This binning procedure not only increases the confidence in the derived relations among systolic pressure, systolic carotid diameter, and R-R interval, but it also reveals the sigmoid nature of these relations. By visual inspection, we excluded bins in the threshold and saturation regions of the pressure/R-R interval relation for all baroreflex analyses (Figure 2, open circles) to estimate the linear gain of mechanical (pressure/diameter), neural (R-R interval/diameter), and integrated (pressure/R-R interval) baroreflex responses. In our laboratory, visual determination of saturation and threshold regions are highly correlated to the use of the second derivative of the relation (r²=0.93). The resulting linear correlation coefficients averaged 0.89±0.09 (range 0.74 to 0.98), 0.88±0.03 (range 0.68 to 0.97), and 0.95±0.02 (range 0.81 to 0.99) for the mechanical, neural, and integrated responses, demonstrating the close linear relations among systolic pressure, systolic carotid diameter, and R-R interval in these subjects.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Relations of systolic pressure to heart period for raw and binned data from Figure 1.

Estimate Variance
A Bland-Altman plot¹⁷ of the 3 estimates of cardiac vagal baroreflex control is shown in Figure 3. Variability in repeated measures relative to the mean was comparable for each baroreflex component and the integrated baroreflex gain, with no systematic bias apparent across gains. The mean difference between trials was 0.06x10³ mm/mm Hg for the mechanical component, 0.92x10^-3ms/mm for the neural component, and 0.32 ms/mm Hg for integrated baroreflex gain. Furthermore, a Leveen test for homogeneity of variance between individual trials¹⁸ indicated that measurement variability was no different among the 3 baroreflex gain estimates: ² _mechanical=0.69±0.17, ² _neural=0.56±0.21, and ² _integrated=0.74±0.16, (P=0.67).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Bland-Altman plots depicting trial-to-trial reproducibility of mechanical pressure transduction (mm/mm Hgx103), neural transduction (ms/mmx10-3), and integrated baroreflex gain (ms/mm Hg).

Relations Among Estimates
Simultaneous measures of mechanical transduction of pressure into stretch near the carotid barosensory area (mm/mm Hg), neural transduction of stretch into vagal outflow (ms/mm), and the resulting integrated baroreflex gain (ms/mm Hg) are shown for 1 subject in Figure 4 (from raw data in Figure 1). This subject demonstrated a marked increase in heart period as systolic pressure increased from 106 to 109 mm Hg (right panel), apparently because of nonlinearity in mechanical pressure transduction (left panel) rather than neural control (middle panel). In the group as a whole, although mechanical and neural gains were only modestly related to integrated cardiac-vagal baroreflex gain (r=0.53, P=0.04, and r=0.35, P=0.18), the simple product of the 2 gains was almost equivalent to the integrated gain (Figure 5). Thus, in these young healthy subjects, neither single component accounts for the integrated baroreflex gain; instead, mechanical and neural components act in concert to produce the integrated baroreflex response.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Simultaneous estimates of mechanical pressure transduction (left), neural baroreflex (middle), and integrated baroreflex gain (right) for data in Figure 1.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Relation between integrated baroreflex and the simple product of mechanical transduction and neural transduction gains.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Our approach to baroreflex assessment adds only a single variable to a standard pharmacological measure, yet provides unique insight to baroreflex function previously unobtainable in humans. Acquisition of beat-by-beat carotid diameters, arterial pressures, and heart periods during the modified Oxford technique allows evaluation of the mechanical and neural components that determine integrated cardiac-vagal baroreflex gain. Although the relations among these variables may contain important information on complex nonlinearities, they are highly reproducible for linear gain assessments, which are most commonly used to characterize autonomic cardiovascular control. As a result, the mechanical and neural baroreflex components can be estimated concomitant with the standard integrated relation via a single additional variable: carotid arterial diameter. Appropriate application of this technique may provide specific insight to alterations in autonomic control in diverse physiological and pathophysiological states.

Technical Considerations
The addition of beat-by-beat carotid diameters to arterial pressure and heart period requires acquisition, maintenance, and analysis of B-mode ultrasound images. Though baseline diameters were not different between trials (6.42±0.14 versus 6.41±0.13; P=0.76), indicating our image acquisition was reliable, we found that maintenance of image quality throughout the pharmacological intervention can be difficult; necessitating 3 trials to consistently obtain 2 complete trials with adequate images for analysis in all subjects. Despite this difficulty, these data reliably characterize the entire range of barosensory vessel engagement during dynamic pressure changes that, to date, have not been described in humans. Other technologies for carotid diameter measurement are available.^{9 19} However, they are limited by an inability to estimate carotid diameters for more than a short duration, usually 5 to 10 seconds. (The duration of the pressure rise in our subjects averaged 76 seconds.) These processes reduce ultrasound information to only a small portion of the signal, producing diameter estimates with greater frequency resolution than B-mode imaging, yet no greater accuracy.¹⁵ It should be noted that our technique is affected by computer hardware limitations. As Figure 1 shows, after the initial few cardiac cycles, image sets were only acquired on approximately every other cardiac cycle because of the speed of the hard drive. Although we were not able to acquire carotid diameter data for every cardiac cycle for the current data, we acquired diameters for at least 60 cardiac cycles, encompassing the entire period of dynamic baroreceptor activation. Moreover, we have recently begun to use a high-speed hard drive and now acquire diameter data on nearly 100% of all cardiac cycles. Additionally, B-mode ultrasonography allows both real-time and post-hoc evaluation of data quality during a procedure that markedly alters the diameter of a highly elastic vessel. Pulsatile carotid diameter changes are 15%,^{9 20} and we observed an additional 15% change in systolic diameter during bolus vasoactive drug infusion in our subjects. These large changes can easily alter the angle of ultrasound insonation and cause misestimation of diameter. However, B-mode imaging provides direct visual feedback to both ultrasound operator and image analyst to identify shifts that would create erroneous diameter changes. This provides a level of confidence in the data that compensates for the level of difficulty in its acquisition.

Our estimates of mechanical pressure transduction, neural afferent-efferent activation, and integrated baroreflex gain were as reproducible, or more so, than other techniques. Reported coefficient of variations for cardiac-vagal baroreflex gain are 29% for Valsalva’s maneuver,²¹ 40% for the spontaneous sequence method, and 52% for both frequency domain and Oxford techniques.²² We found a coefficient of variation of 23% for standard integrated baroreflex gain, slightly less than, but not significantly different from 32% for the mechanical component and 26% for the neural component. Although a third trial may have reduced the error of our estimates and may be necessary in individuals with lower baroreflex gain, 2 trials resulted in comparable variance without any systematic bias in each component and integrated gain. Thus, reliance on ultrasound-derived, beat-by-beat carotid diameters for our 2 baroreflex component estimates introduces no greater trial-to-trial variability to baroreflex gain assessments via the modified Oxford technique.

Physiological Considerations
We devised an approach to baroreflex physiology based on established findings that support a line of evidence for this technique. Arterial baroreceptive afferents are primarily responsive to pressure-related stretch.^{5 6} In their classic work, Kober and Arndt²⁰ showed that changes in transmural arterial pressure were linearly related to changes in carotid diameter, suggesting carotid arterial pressure may be used as a surrogate for arterial diameter. However, significant deformation of barosensory areas in humans^{23 24} and altered afferent baroreceptor activity in dogs²⁵ may occur in the absence of measurable arterial pressure changes. Therefore, pressure may not index the true arterial baroreceptor stimulus. In fact, the prevailing arterial pressure as well as afferent nervous activity appear to be determined by barosensory vessel diameter. In patients after endarterectomy, those with increased carotid sinus diameter had greater carotid sinus nerve activity and lower postoperative blood pressure.²⁶ Thus, excising carotid tissue altered the relation between pressure and diameter but not that between diameter and nervous activity. Although the only human data demonstrate a simple proportionality between carotid sinus dimensions and integrated carotid sinus nerve activity within the cardiac cycle,⁶ animal data suggest a linear proportionality applies throughout broader pressure ranges.^{27 28} These data suggest that carotid diameter may serve as an appropriate index of the arterial baroreceptor stimulus and resulting afferent activity.

Afferent baroreceptor stimulation generates R-R interval responses that are proportional in humans⁷ and linear in cats.²⁹ Although cardiac chronotropy can also be modulated by cardiovascular sympathetic afferents,^{30 31} rapid heart period responses to baroreflex engagement in humans is likely to be predominantly mediated through efferent vagal activity,² because cardiac sympathetic activity tends to have longer lag time.³² Moreover, though acute and chronic cardiac sympathetic blockade may augment baroreflex sensitivity,³³ baroreflex-mediated heart period slowing does not occur without intact cardiac parasympathetic activation.^{34 35} Thus, the R-R interval provides a commonly accepted estimate of the cardiac vagal efferent response to arterial baroreflex engagement.

Assessing each of the above steps in the baroreflex control of arterial pressure is difficult in the intact human. However, given that barosensory vessel stretch is a key determinant of reflex responses, we thought the simple addition of a diameter estimate would provide incisive information on baroreflex physiology. The standard relation of R-R interval to arterial pressure is a global estimate of the cardiac vagal limb of systemic control. We derived 2 additional relations: arterial pressure to carotid diameter and carotid diameter to R-R interval. The first provides information on the mechanical transduction of the controlled variable to the input variable for baroreflex engagement. The second provides a global index of the complex integration of baroreceptor afferent activation and CNS efferent outflow, resulting in cardiac slowing or acceleration. Thus, 2 distinct components that determine integrated baroreflex gain can be assessed.

It should be noted that a linear model is commonly used to estimate cardiac-vagal baroreflex gain. However, baroreflex-mediated R-R interval responses to arterial pressure changes demonstrate a clear sigmoid pattern; R-R interval responses are minimal below threshold and above saturation pressures and are maximal at some point within this range.³⁶ Following convention, we merely applied a linear model to the relations between threshold and saturation.¹² When examining the data presented in Figure 4, it is apparent that this approach does not capture some aspects of the complex, nonlinear, cascade of events linking arterial pressure changes to R-R interval responses. This subject demonstrated a clear nonlinearity in the mechanical component, although these points lie within the most linear region of the integrated baroreflex response. Thus, the most linear range of the integrated baroreflex is likely the result of the interplay between nonlinear and linear mechanical and neural components of the reflex arc. Although using a sigmoid model would provide insight to this intriguing aspect of baroreflex physiology, we have shown previously that not all, nor all relations, will consistently demonstrate the entire sigmoid range with the modified Oxford testing. However, a linear model applied to the region between threshold and saturation produces a robust estimate of baroreflex gain, the most important aspect of pressure regulation.³⁷

Our linear estimates of mechanical pressure transduction and neural afferent-efferent activation were related strongly to integrated baroreflex gain within subjects but only modestly among subjects. The simple product of the components almost equaled the measured integrated gain for each trial. This may not seem surprising, but each slope was determined independently and thus no mathematical dependency existed. Therefore, the strong relationship indicates that these 2 components encompass the primary determinants of arterial baroreflex gain. There was 13% of the actual measured integrated gain not accounted for, indicating there are other aspects of baroreflex function not explained by these measures. In the group as a whole, the neural component was not significantly related to integrated gain, whereas the mechanical component more strongly predicted integrated gain. Data from Lage et al¹ on basal measures of carotid compliance show a similar relation to baroreflex gain in normotensive and hypertensive adults. However, our laboratory and others have reported that basal measures of carotid stiffness were more strongly related to integrated baroreflex gain in young adults (r=0.78 to 0.82).^{9 38} This might be explained by the fact that stiffness measures are not pressure dependent whereas both our mechanical component and compliance measures are pressure dependent. However, our technique provides information relevant to the dynamic, and possibly more complex, mechanical transduction of pressure throughout the responsive range of the baroreflex.

Clinical Implications
Given our homogeneous study population, it may not be surprising that neither mechanical pressure transduction nor neural baroreflex gain were strongly associated with integrated baroreflex gain. In young healthy adults without arterial stiffening or autonomic neuropathy, it is quite possible that both mechanical and neural components play equally important roles in baroreflex pressure regulation. However, insight to baroreflex function may be gained in populations known to have altered vascular mechanics, neurological lesions, or depressed baroreflex function of unknown origin. For example, coronary artery disease patients are known to have depressed integrated baroreflex gain that is presumed to be parasympathetic in origin.² However, preliminary data from our laboratory on 3 adults with coronary artery disease shows the previously described decrement in integrated baroreflex gain compared with 4 age-matched healthy adults (Figure 6), yet their neural baroreflex component is similar. This would suggest that autonomic neural function is intact and that vascular structural change underlies blunted baroreflex function in coronary disease. However, the use in a clinical setting would be dependent on establishing normative data for each baroreflex component, which at present does not exist.

View larger version (42K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Differences in integrated baroreflex gain (left) and transduction gain (right) from preliminary data from healthy adults and coronary artery disease subjects.

This work defined and tested an approach to baroreflex physiology. Our findings, as well as the above preliminary data, demonstrate that important information on autonomic physiology may be derived with appropriate application of our technique. Although the standard description of baroreflex function from heart period and arterial pressure relations provides broad insight to autonomic control, the simple addition of a single key physiological variable may provide more mechanistic insight. Assessment of the mechanical and neural baroreflex components via our technique may provide critical understanding of autonomic function in human health and disease.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported by National Institute of Health R29 grant AG14376 (to J.A.T.). B.E.H. was supported by National Research Service Award F32AG00251 and a Shuman Fellowship. Custom data analysis software, which was invaluable to this project and others, was written by Jason Hamner.

Received July 13, 2000; first decision August 9, 2000; accepted December 1, 2000.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Lage SG, Polak JF, O’Leary DH, Creager MA. Relationship of arterial compliance to baroreflex function in hypertensive patients. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H232–H237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Eckberg DL, Drabinsky M, Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:877–883.

3. Bennett T, Hosking DJ, Hampton JR. Cardiovascular responses to graded reductions of central blood volume in normal subjects and in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci. 1980;58:193–200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Sagawa K. Concerning "gain." Am J Physiol. 1978;235:H117.

5. Sollman T, Brown ED. The blood pressure fall produced by traction on the carotid artery. Am J Physiol. 1912;30:88–104.

6. Angell-James JE, Lumley JS. Changes in the mechanical properties of the carotid sinus region and carotid sinus nerve activity in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Physiol (Lond). 1975;244:80P-81P.

7. Borst C, Karemaker JM, Dunning AJ, Bouman LN, Wagner J. Frequency limitation in the human baroreceptor reflex. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1983;9:381–397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Veglio M, Carpano-Maglioli P, Tonda L, Quadri R, Giannella R, Rosa C, Fonzo D. Autonomic neuropathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients: correlation with age, sex, duration and metabolic control of diabetes. Diabete Metab. 1990;16:200–206.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Bonyhay I, Jokkel G, Kollai M. Relation between baroreflex sensitivity and carotid artery elasticity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H1139–H1144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Taylor MG. The elastic properties of arteries in relation to the physiological functions of the arterial system. Gastroenterology. 1967;52:358–363.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Carlsten A, Folkow B, Hamberger C-A. Cardiovascular effects of direct vagal stimulation in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957;41:68–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Ebert TJ. Differential effects of nitrous oxide on baroreflex control of heart rate and peripheral sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:16–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Rudas L, Crossman AA, Morillo CA, Halliwill JR, Tahvanainen KU, Kuusela TA, Eckberg DL. Human sympathetic and vagal baroreflex responses to sequential nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1691–H1698.

14. Stadler RW, Karl WC, Lees RS. New methods for arterial diameter measurement from B-mode images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:25–34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Stadler RW, Taylor JA, Lees RS. Comparison of B-mode, M-mode and echo tracking methods for measurement of the arterial distension waveform. Ultrasound Med and Biol. 1997;23:879–887.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Eckberg DL, Eckberg MJ. Human sinus node responses to repetitive, ramped carotid baroreceptor stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:H638–H644.

17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Glass GV, Hopkins KD. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. 3rd ed. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon; 1996.

19. Barth JD, Blankenhorn DH, Wickham E, Lai JY, Chin HP, Selzer RH. Quantitative ultrasound pulsation study in human carotid artery disease. Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8:778–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Kober G, Arndt JO. Pressure-diameter relationship in the common carotid artery of conscious man. Pflugers Arch. 1970;314:27–39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Lord SW, Clayton RH, Hall MC, Gray JC, Murray A, McComb JM, Kenny RA. Reproducibility of three different methods of measuring baroreflex sensitivity in normal subjects. Clin Sci (Colch). 1998;95:575–581.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Davies LC, Francis D, Jurak P, Kara T, Piepoli M, Coats AJ. Reproducibility of methods for assessing baroreflex sensitivity in normal controls and in patients with chronic heart failure. Clin Sci (Colch). 1999;97:515–522.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Lacolley PJ, Pannier BM, Slama MA, Cuche JL, Hoeks AP, Laurent S, London GM, Safar ME. Carotid arterial haemodynamics after mild degrees of lower-body negative pressure in man. Clin Sci (Colch). 1992;83:535–540.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Taylor JA, Halliwill JR, Brown TE, Hayano J, Eckberg DL. Non-hypotensive hypovolemia reduces ascending aortic dimensions in humans. J Physiol. 1995;483:1:289–298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Hajduczok G, Chapleau MW, Abboud FM. Rheoreceptors in the carotid sinus of dog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:7399–7403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Angell-James JE, Lumley JS. The effects of carotid endarterectomy on the mechanical properties of the carotid sinus and carotid sinus nerve activity in atherosclerotic patients. Br J Surg. 1974;61:805–810.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Hartikainen J, Ahonen E, Nevalainen T, Sikanen A, Hakumaki M. Haemodynamic information encoded in the aortic baroreceptor discharge during haemorrhage. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;140:181–189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Landgren S. The baroceptor activity in the carotid sinus nerve and the distensibility of the sinus wall. Acta Physiol Scand. 1952;26:35–56.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Kunze DL. Reflex discharge patterns of cardiac vagal efferent fibres. J Physiol (Lond). 1972;222:1–15.

30. Gnecchi Ruscone T, Lombardi F, Malfatto G, Malliani A. Attenuation of baroreceptive mechanisms by cardiovascular sympathetic afferent fibers. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H787–H791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Schwartz PJ, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Brown AM. A cardiocardiac sympathovagal reflex in the cat. Circ Res. 1973;32:215–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Samaan A. The antogonistic cardiac nerves and heart rate. J Physiol. 1935;83:332–340.

33. Floras JS, Jones JV, Hassan MO, Sleight P. Effects of acute and chronic beta-adrenoceptor blockade on baroreflex sensitivity in humans. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1988;25:87–94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Pickering TG, Gribbin B, Petersen ES, Cunningham DJ, Sleight P. Effects of autonomic blockade on the baroreflex in man at rest and during exercise. Circ Res. 1972;30:177–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Sullebarger JT, Liang CS, Woolf PD, Willick AE, Richeson JF. Comparison of phenylephrine bolus and infusion methods in baroreflex measurements. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69:962–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Korner PI, Shaw J, West MJ, Oliver JR. Central nervous system control of baroreceptor reflexes in the rabbit. Circ Res. 1972;31:637–652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Farquhar WB, Freeman R, Hunt BE, Darling SE, Taylor JA. The human arterial baroreflex: can a simple line adequately model a sigmoid relation? Physiologist. 2000;43:281. Abstract.

38. Williams TD, O’Mahony D, Green A, Taylor JA. Spontaneous baroreflex indices do not correlate to carotid pulsatile elasticity. FASEB J. 1998;12:A688. Abstract.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. D. Monahan A new answer to an old question: does ageing modify baroreflex control of vascular sympathetic outflow in humans? J. Physiol., May 1, 2009; 587(9): 1857 - 1857. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Pét. Studinger, R. Goldstein, and J. A. Taylor Age- and fitness-related alterations in vascular sympathetic control J. Physiol., May 1, 2009; 587(9): 2049 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Deley, G. Picard, and J. A. Taylor Arterial Baroreflex Control of Cardiac Vagal Outflow in Older Individuals Can Be Enhanced by Aerobic Exercise Training Hypertension, May 1, 2009; 53(5): 826 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Deley, R. D. Lipman, J. P. Kannam, C. Bartolini, and J. A. Taylor Stress responses and baroreflex function in coronary disease J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 576 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Hunt, R. Tamisier, G. S. Gilmartin, M. Curley, A. Anand, and J. W. Weiss Baroreflex responsiveness during ventilatory acclimatization in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): H1794 - H1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Ptaszynski, T. Klingenheben, B. Gerritse, and L. Kornet Risk stratification after myocardial infarction: a new method of determining the neural component of the baroreflex is potentially more discriminative in distinguishing patients at high and low risk for arrhythmias Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 227 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Studinger, R. Goldstein, and J. A. Taylor Mechanical and neural contributions to hysteresis in the cardiac vagal limb of the arterial baroreflex J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 1041 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hesse, N. Charkoudian, Z. Liu, M. J. Joyner, and J. H. Eisenach Baroreflex Sensitivity Inversely Correlates With Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Healthy Normotensive Humans Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Olufsen, H. T. Tran, J. T. Ottesen, Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program, L. A. Lipsitz, and V. Novak Modeling baroreflex regulation of heart rate during orthostatic stress Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1355 - R1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Alvarez, B. M. Davy, T. P. Ballard, S. D. Beske, and K. P. Davy Weight loss increases cardiovagal baroreflex function in obese young and older men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2005; 289(4): E665 - E669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Lenard, P. Studinger, B. Mersich, G. Pavlik, and M. Kollai Cardiovagal autonomic function in sedentary and trained offspring of hypertensive parents J. Physiol., June 15, 2005; 565(3): 1031 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Hunt and W. B. Farquhar Nonlinearities and asymmetries of the human cardiovagal baroreflex Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): R1339 - R1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Lenard, P. Studinger, B. Mersich, L. Kocsis, and M. Kollai Maturation of Cardiovagal Autonomic Function From Childhood to Young Adult Age Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2307 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Lipman, J. K. Salisbury, and J. A. Taylor Spontaneous Indices Are Inconsistent With Arterial Baroreflex Gain Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Studinger, Z. Lenard, Z. Kovats, L. Kocsis, and M. Kollai Static and dynamic changes in carotid artery diameter in humans during and after strenuous exercise J. Physiol., July 15, 2003; 550(2): 575 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mukai, M. Gagnon, I. Iloputaife, J. W. Hamner, and L. A. Lipsitz Effect of Systolic Blood Pressure and Carotid Stiffness on Baroreflex Gain in Elderly Subjects J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2003; 58(7): M626 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Lipman, P. Grossman, S. E. Bridges, J.W. Hamner, and J. A. Taylor Mental Stress Response, Arterial Stiffness, and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Healthy Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2002; 57(7): B279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. Kaushal and J. A. Taylor Inter-relations among declines in arterial distensibility, baroreflex function and respiratory sinus arrhythmia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1524 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Kingwell, J. D. Cameron, A. M. Dart, K. D. Monahan, H. Tanaka, F. A. Dinenno, and D. R. Seals Large Artery Stiffness and Baroreflex Function Response Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105 (8): e56 - e56. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Monahan, H. Tanaka, F. A. Dinenno, and D. R. Seals Central Arterial Compliance Is Associated With Age- and Habitual Exercise-Related Differences in Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity Circulation, October 2, 2001; 104(14): 1627 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Taylor, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Taylor, J. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB PHENYLEPHRINE Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation