(Hypertension. 2001;37:1429.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Kings College, London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr P.J. Chowienczyk, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St Thomas Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK. E-mail phil.chowienczyk{at}kcl.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antihypertensive agents aorta arteries hemodynamics pulse
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Studies 2 and 3
Studies 2 and 3 were performed in a subset of 12 of
the men in study 1 age 23 to 45 years. All were normotensive (office
blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg), and none had a serum total
cholesterol >6.0 mmol/L. All subjects gave written
informed consent for the study, which was approved by St Thomas
Hospital Research Ethics Committee.
Experimental Protocol
Study 1
Subjects (n=50) were studied in a quiet
temperature-controlled laboratory (26±1°C) after 20 minutes of lying
supine. AIx was determined by applanation tonometry of the left radial
artery by using a Millar piezo-resistive pressure transducer (Millar
SPT 301, Millar Instruments) coupled to a Sphygmocor device (PWV
Medical). AIx was calculated from the aortic pressure waveform obtained
by applying a transfer function to the radial pressure
waveform.13 The
reproducibility of this method has been found to be acceptable, with
the standard deviation of the difference between repeated measurements
being 4% to 5%.14
PWVcf was determined by sequential acquisition
of pressure waveforms from the carotid and the femoral arteries by use
of the same tonometer. The timing of these waveforms was compared with
that of the R wave on a simultaneously recorded ECG.
PWV was determined by calculation of the difference in carotid to
femoral path length divided by the difference in R wave to waveform
foot times. The difference in carotid to femoral path length was
estimated from the distance from the sternal notch to the femoral pulse
(at the point of application of the tonometer) measured in a direct
line. This method of measurement results in a systematic overestimation
of path length and, hence, PWVcf by
10% but
reduces interobserver variability. In some studies, carotid to radial
PWV (PWVcr) was determined by sequential
acquisition of pressure waveforms from the carotid and the radial
arteries. The distance from the sternal notch to radial artery was used
to calculate PWVcr. The within-subject
coefficient of variability of PWVcf measurements
(estimated by the method of Quan and
Shih,15 from 3 measurements
separated by 1 week on each of 8 healthy volunteers) was 5.3%. Blood
pressure was measured in the right brachial artery by use of an
automated oscillometric method (Dinamap model 1846 SX,
Critikon).
Study 2
Subjects (n=10) attended on 3 days according to a
single-blind, randomized, 3-phase, placebo-controlled, crossover study
design. The within-subject coefficient of variability for
PWVcf was used to estimate the number of
subjects that would give 90% power to detect a change in
PWVcf of <0.5 m/s. A venous cannula for the
infusion of drug/saline placebo was inserted; subjects were then
allowed to rest for 30 minutes. Blood pressure, AIx, and
PWVcf were then measured during the infusion of
saline for 15 minutes and then at the end of 3 cumulative 15-minute
intravenous infusions of the study drug. On the 3 separate
days, these infusions were of NTG (3, 30, and 300 µg/min, David Bull
Laboratories), Ang II (75, 150, and 300 ng/min, Clinalfa), or 0.9%
saline placebo.
Study 3
A further study was performed in 6 subjects (4 of
whom participated in study 2) to assess the effects of Ang II on
PWVcr. Subjects received Ang II and saline
placebo on 2 separate occasions according to a protocol that was
otherwise identical to that in study 2. PWVcr
was measured in addition to measurements of
PWVcf and AIx.
Statistical Analysis
Subject characteristics
(Table)
are expressed as mean±SD. Results are expressed as mean±SE.
Univariate and multiple stepwise regression
analyses were used to examine associations between AIx and the
following variables: age, height, body mass index, heart rate,
systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,
serum total cholesterol, and PWVcf.
ANOVA for repeated measures was used to test for differences in
hemodynamic variables. For analysis of the
effects of Ang II on PWVcf and AIx, data from
studies 2 and 3 were combined with mean values used for subjects who
participated in both studies. A value of
P<0.05 was taken as
statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study 2
During the infusion of saline placebo, there was no
significant change in heart rate or blood pressure. NTG decreased both
systolic and diastolic blood pressures from
121±4/61±1 mm Hg at baseline to 105±4/49±1 mm Hg during
infusion of the highest dose and increased the heart rate from 64±4 to
80±4 bpm (each P<0.0001,
Figure 2). Ang II increased systolic and
diastolic blood pressures from 114±4/59±2 mm Hg to
132±5/75±2 mm Hg (each
P<0.0001) without affecting
the heart rate (P=0.50,
Figure 2).
|
There were no significant changes in AIx and PWVcf during saline infusion. Effects of NTG and Ang II on AIx and PWVcf are shown in Figure 2. NTG produced a dose-dependent decrease in AIx from 4.8±2.3% at baseline to -11.9±5.3% at the highest dose (P<0.002). Ang II produced a dose-dependent increase in AIx from 9.3±2.4% to 18.3±2.9% (P<0.001). NTG and Ang II produced small but significant changes in PWVcf (P<0.05). The change in PWV from baseline during the highest dose of NTG was -0.74 m/s (95% CI -1.4 to -0.1 m/s), and that for Ang II was 0.70 m/s (95% CI 0.3 to 1.0 m/s). The highest dose of Ang II caused an increase of 2.0±0.4 m/s in PWVcr (n=6, P<0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, in addition to the well-recognized associations between AIx and age16 and between PWVcf and age,17 18 19 we observed the expected correlation between AIx and PWVcf. However, the correlation between AIx and PWVcf was not independent of age, and age was the only independent predictor of AIx in multiple stepwise regression. The results of such an analysis must be treated with some caution because of the strong interrelationship of the variables involved (Figure 1). Furthermore, there is inevitably some error in estimating the path length used to calculate PWVcf from surface markings, although in the present study, the between-subject variation in height (coefficient of variation) was only 20% that of PWVcf. The lack of an independent correlation between AIx and PWVcf does not mean that PWVcf does not influence AIx. However, it does suggest that aging is associated with a factor other than increased PWVcf, which contributes to the increase in AIx and points to the possible importance of reflected wave intensity as a determinant of AIx independent of PWVcf.
To examine the possibility that AIx may be changed independently of PWVcf, we investigated the effects of the vasodilator NTG and vasoconstrictor Ang II, reasoning that these would act predominantly to alter the tone of the small muscular arteries/arterioles but would have little effect on the elastic aorta. The major finding is that NTG and Ang II are capable of producing large changes in AIx, comparable to age-related changes seen over a range of >40 years in subjects at rest (Figure 1). By contrast, both NTG and Ang II produced little effect on PWVcf, with mean changes from baseline (<1.0 m/s) being much less than age-related changes in PWVcf. The predominantly elastic nature of the aorta may minimize the effects of acute changes in vascular tone and blood pressure on PWVcf. Furthermore, an alteration in shear forces may result in adaptive changes mediated by endothelium-derived or other factors that also minimize the effects of acute changes in vascular tone on PWVcf. In muscular arteries, such as the conduit arteries of the upper limb, Ang II would be expected to have a proportionately greater effect, and indeed, in the present study, Ang II had a greater effect on PWVcr. The findings with respect to NTG are also consistent with those of other investigators,20 21 22 23 who demonstrated that the favorable effects of NTG on left ventricular load are mainly due to the dilatation of small arteries. The lack of a large effect of NTG and Ang II despite substantial changes in arterial blood pressure supports the hypothesis that the association of an increased aortic PWV with hypertension occurs mainly as a results of structural alterations24 rather than as a result of raised blood pressure alone. It is also consistent with the finding that decreased aortic arterial compliance in hypertension cannot be attributed entirely to elevated blood pressure.25
Although we cannot exclude the possibility that the effects of Ang II and NTG on AIx were secondary to altered characteristics of ventricular function, such as contractility or ejection duration, we believe that this is unlikely. The effect of Ang II on AIx was independent of heart rate. We have previously shown that in healthy volunteers, NTG produces an increase in cardiac output (presumably as a result of reflex sympathetic activation in response to peripheral vasodilation).26 Thus, the contrasting effects of NTG and Ang II on AIx are unlikely to be explained by altered ventricular ejection time or contractility alone. Rather, the predominant effects of NTG and Ang II on AIx are likely to be due to an alteration in vascular tone of small arteries around the major site of pressure-wave reflection and, hence, a change in the intensity of pressure-wave reflections. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that in healthy men, vascular tone has an important influence on AIx independent of any effect on PWVcf. They do not preclude a greater influence of aortic stiffness on AIx in subjects with renal failure, multiple risk factors, or established vascular disease. These subjects may have a greatly increased PWVcf,27 28 29 which may then become a more important determinant of AIx.
It is important to note a number of limitations of the present study. The drug studies were performed in a single-blind fashion because of the difficulty in blinding the investigators in the presence of large hemodynamic changes. A relatively small number of subjects were involved. However, all measurements were automated, and confidence limits for PWV were such as to exclude changes of pathophysiological importance. AIx was determined by using a radial to aortic transfer function.13 The use of such a transfer function will inevitably result in some error in estimating the true AIx. Although previous work13 30 suggests that such an error will be small in comparison with the large changes seen in the present study, it cannot be directly quantified without performing invasive studies. Even if such an error were substantial, the results of the present study are of practical importance because the Sphygmocor device is now in widespread use and is now being used in large multicenter trials.
In conclusion, in healthy men, AIx as determined by the Sphygmocor device is influenced by vasoactive drugs independently of effects on PWVcf. PWVcf and AIx cannot be regarded as interchangeable indices of "vascular stiffness." Together, they may provide information on large-artery stiffness and small-artery tone/structure, which influence wave reflection.
Received July 13, 2000; first decision September 11, 2000; accepted December 4, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. L. Hall, N. L. Formanuik, D. Harnpanich, M. Cheung, D. Talbot, P. J. Chowienczyk, and T. A. B. Sanders A Meal Enriched with Soy Isoflavones Increases Nitric Oxide-Mediated Vasodilation in Healthy Postmenopausal Women J. Nutr., July 1, 2008; 138(7): 1288 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Edwards, M. S. Roy, and R. Y. Prasad Wave reflection augments central systolic and pulse pressures during facial cooling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2535 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Karalliedde, A. Smith, L. DeAngelis, V. Mirenda, A. Kandra, J. Botha, P. Ferber, and G. Viberti Valsartan Improves Arterial Stiffness in Type 2 Diabetes Independently of Blood Pressure Lowering Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1617 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu and K. Kario Review: Role of the augmentation index in hypertension Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Edwards, C. R. Mastin, and R. W. Kenefick Wave reflection and central aortic pressure are increased in response to static and dynamic muscle contraction at comparable workloads J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Payne, D. Isnardi, P. J. D. Andrews, S. R. J. Maxwell, and D. J. Webb Similarity between the suprasystolic wideband external pulse wave and the first derivative of the intra-arterial pulse wave Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 653 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Bjarnegard, C Bengtsson, J Brodszki, G Sturfelt, O Nived, and T Lanne Increased aortic pulse wave velocity in middle aged women with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, October 1, 2006; 15(10): 644 - 650. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Westerhof, I. Guelen, N. Westerhof, J. M. Karemaker, and A. Avolio Quantification of Wave Reflection in the Human Aorta From Pressure Alone: A Proof of Principle Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Thomson, G. B. Drummond, W. S. Waring, D. J. Webb, and S. R. J. Maxwell Effects of short-term isocapnic hyperoxia and hypoxia on cardiovascular function J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Stewart, B. Jiang, S. C. Millasseau, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Acute Reduction of Blood Pressure by Nitroglycerin Does Not Normalize Large Artery Stiffness in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 404 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Kielstein, F. Donnerstag, S. Gasper, J. Menne, A. Kielstein, J. Martens-Lobenhoffer, F. Scalera, J. P. Cooke, D. Fliser, and S. M. Bode-Boger ADMA Increases Arterial Stiffness and Decreases Cerebral Blood Flow in Humans Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2024 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. H. Hermans, V. Brandenburg, M. Ketteler, J. P. Kooman, F. M. van der Sande, U. Gladziwa, P. L. Rensma, K. Bartelet, C. J. A. M. Konings, A. P. G. Hoeks, et al. Study on the relationship of serum fetuin-A concentration with aortic stiffness in patients on dialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1293 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The CAFE Investigators, for the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee, B. Williams, P. S. Lacy, S. M. Thom, K. Cruickshank, A. Stanton, D. Collier, A. D. Hughes, et al. Differential Impact of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes: Principal Results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study Circulation, March 7, 2006; 113(9): 1213 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Laurent Surrogate Measures of Arterial Stiffness: Do They Have Additive Predictive Value or Are They Only Surrogates of a Surrogate? Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 325 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Eldrup, H. Sillesen, E. Prescott, and B. G. Nordestgaard Ankle brachial index, C-reactive protein, and central augmentation index to identify individuals with severe atherosclerosis Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 316 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Waveform dispersion, not reflection, may be the major determinant of aortic pressure wave morphology Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2497 - H2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A L Pauca, N D Kon, and M F O'Rourke Benefit of glyceryl trinitrate on arterial stiffness is directly due to effects on peripheral arteries Heart, November 1, 2005; 91(11): 1428 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. J Bogert and J. J van Lieshout Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger Exp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 90(4): 437 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Verbeke, P. Segers, S. Heireman, R. Vanholder, P. Verdonck, and L. M. Van Bortel Noninvasive Assessment of Local Pulse Pressure: Importance of Brachial-to-Radial Pressure Amplification Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 244 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Rubin, M. S. Maurer, D. J. McMahon, J. P. Bilezikian, and S. J. Silverberg Arterial Stiffness in Mild Primary Hyperparathyroidism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3326 - 3330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Nair, L. A. Chaput, E. Vittinghoff, D. M. Herrington, and for the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement S Pulse Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in Postmenopausal Women With Coronary Heart Disease Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1498 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Chirinos, J. P. Zambrano, S. Chakko, A. Veerani, A. Schob, H. J. Willens, G. Perez, and A. J. Mendez Aortic Pressure Augmentation Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Established Coronary Artery Disease Hypertension, May 1, 2005; 45(5): 980 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Yasmin, C. M. McEniery, S. Wallace, I. S. Mackenzie, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson C-Reactive Protein Is Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Apparently Healthy Individuals Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 969 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Covic, D. J. A. Goldsmith, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, and M. Covic Haemodialysis acutely improves endothelium-independent vasomotor function without significantly influencing the endothelium-mediated abnormal response to a {beta}2-agonist Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 637 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mather and R. Lewanczuk Measurement of Arterial Stiffness in Diabetes: A cautionary tale Diabetes Care, March 1, 2004; 27(3): 831 - 833. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Stewart, S. C. Millasseau, M. T. Kearney, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Effects of Inhibition of Basal Nitric Oxide Synthesis on Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index in Humans Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 915 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-S. Tsai, C. B. Yucha, W. W. Nichols, and H. Yarandi Hemodynamics and Arterial Properties in Response to Mental Stress in Individuals with Mild Hypertension Psychosom Med, July 1, 2003; 65(4): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Oliver and D. J. Webb Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 554 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tamminen, J. Westerbacka, S. Vehkavaara, and H. Yki-Jarvinen Insulin-Induced Decreases in Aortic Wave Reflection and Central Systolic Pressure Are Impaired in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2002; 25(12): 2314 - 2319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lantelme, C. Mestre, M. Lievre, A. Gressard, and H. Milon Heart Rate: An Important Confounder of Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment Hypertension, June 1, 2002; 39(6): 1083 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||