Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2001;38:884-890
doi: 10.1161/hy1101.092970
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henriksen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krekler, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henriksen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krekler, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Glucose intolerance
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction

(Hypertension. 2001;38:884.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Selective Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonism Reduces Insulin Resistance in Obese Zucker Rats

Erik J. Henriksen; Stephan Jacob; Tyson R. Kinnick; Mary K. Teachey; Michael Krekler

From the Muscle Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine (E.J.H., T.R.K., M.K.T.), Tucson; Department of Endocrinology, Eberhard-Karls University (S.J.), Tübingen, Germany; and Bristol-Myers Squibb (M.K.), Munich, Germany.

Correspondence to Erik J. Henriksen, PhD, Department of Physiology, Ina E. Gittings Bldg 93, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0093. E-mail ejhenrik{at}u.arizona.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract— Effects of oral administration of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (selective AT1-subtype) irbesartan on glucose tolerance and insulin action on skeletal-muscle glucose transport were assessed in the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat. In the acute study, obese rats received either vehicle (water) or irbesartan 1 hour before the experiment. Although irbesartan had no effect on glucose transport (2-deoxyglucose uptake) in the epitrochlearis muscle, which consists mainly of type IIb fibers, acute angiotensin II receptor antagonism led to a dose-dependent increase in insulin action in the predominantly type I soleus muscle. Irbesartan at 25 and 50 mg/kg induced significant increases (41% and 50%, respectively; P<0.05) in insulin-mediated glucose transport. Moreover, these acute irbesartan-induced improvements in soleus-muscle glucose transport were associated with enhancements in whole-body insulin sensitivity (r=-0.732; P<0.05), as assessed during an oral glucose tolerance test. After chronic administration of irbesartan (21 days at 50 mg · kg-1 · d-1), glucose tolerance was enhanced further, and insulin-mediated glucose transport was significantly elevated in both epitrochlearis (32%) and soleus (73%) muscle. Chronic angiotensin II receptor antagonism was associated with significant increases in glucose transporter-4 (GLUT-4) protein expression in soleus (22%) and plantaris (20%) muscle and myocardium (15%). Chronic irbesartan-induced increases in whole-body insulin sensitivity were associated with increased insulin-mediated glucose transport in both epitrochlearis (r=-0.677; P<0.05) and soleus (r=-0.892; P<0.05) muscle. In summary, angiotensin II receptor (AT1-subtype) antagonism, either acutely or chronically, improves glucose tolerance, at least in part because of an enhancement in skeletal-muscle glucose transport, and the effect of chronic angiotensin II receptor antagonism on type I skeletal-muscle glucose uptake is associated with an increase in GLUT-4 protein expression.


Key Words: irbesartan • glucose • muscle, skeletal • transport, glucose • rats, Zucker • receptors, angiotensin


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Individuals with essential hypertension frequently display a clustering of additional atherogenic risk factors, including insulin resistance of skeletal-muscle glucose uptake, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and central adiposity, in a condition described as "insulin resistance syndrome."1 Angiotensin (Ang) II is a potent vasoconstrictor and can contribute to the pathogenesis of hypertension.2 Reductions in formation of Ang II, as results from treatment with ACE inhibitors or inhibition of the cellular actions of Ang II by the use of specific Ang II (AT1-subtype) antagonists, are effective interventions for lowering blood pressure.35 Although both animal model studies612 and clinical investigations6,1318 have demonstrated that ACE inhibitor treatment can ameliorate peripheral insulin resistance, the role of a specific reduction in Ang II action on whole-body and skeletal-muscle insulin responsiveness remains controversial.

We have recently shown that acute oral administration of an Ang II (AT1-subtype) receptor antagonist (eprosartan) has no significant effect on in vitro insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in type IIb muscle (epitrochlearis) of the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat.19 In contrast, chronic administration of Ang II receptor antagonists to insulin-resistant fructose-fed12 or spontaneously hypertensive20 rats or to human subjects with essential hypertension21 leads to significant improvements in whole-body insulin sensitivity. Moreover, Rao22 and Richey et al23 have reported that acute infusion of Ang II leads to substantial reduction in glucose disposal in normal skeletal muscle, which could not be attributed to hemodynamic alterations.23 To our knowledge, neither the acute effects of specific Ang II receptor antagonism on insulin-stimulated glucose transport in insulin-resistant type I skeletal muscle (eg, soleus) nor the chronic effects of Ang II receptor antagonism on the skeletal-muscle glucose transport system in conditions of insulin resistance have been investigated.

In this context, the purpose of the present study was to assess in an animal model of skeletal-muscle insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, and dyslipidemia (obese Zucker fa/fa rat) the effects of acute or chronic treatment with a specific Ang II receptor (AT1-subtype) antagonist, irbesartan, on whole-body glucose disposal and on in vitro insulin-stimulated skeletal-muscle glucose transport activity. This latter approach has the advantage of allowing for assessment of adaptive responses in the skeletal-muscle glucose transport system independent of any potential hemodynamic influences. In addition, the potential role of alterations in expression of skeletal-muscle glucose transporter-4 (GLUT-4) protein in the regulation of insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity after chronic antagonism of Ang II receptors was investigated.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals and Treatments
Female obese Zucker rats (HsdOla:ZUCKER-fa; Harlan World Headquarters, Indianapolis, Ind) were received at 6 to 7 weeks of age. Starting at 8 to 9 weeks of age, animals received acutely (1 hour) by gavage either vehicle (water) or irbesartan (5, 25, or 50 mg/kg). In a separate chronic study, animals received 50 mg · kg-1 · d-1 of either vehicle or irbesartan by gavage for 21 consecutive days.

Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests
Animals were food restricted (4 g of chow given at 5:00 PM) the evening before the experiment. Between 8:00 and 10:00 AM, 1 hour (acute study) or {approx}12 hours (chronic study) after the most recent treatment, animals underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with a 1-g/kg body wt glucose feeding by gavage. Blood was drawn from a cut at the tip of the tail at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the glucose feeding. Whole blood was mixed thoroughly with EDTA (18 mmol/L final concentration) and centrifuged at 13 000g to separate the plasma. Plasma samples were analyzed for glucose (Sigma Chemical Co), insulin (Linco Research Inc), and free fatty acids (Wako Chemicals USA Inc). Immediately after completion of the OGTT, all animals received 2.5 mL SC of sterile 0.9% saline to compensate for plasma loss. In the acute study, animals remained untreated for 3 days after OGTT and then received a second acute administration of the same dosage level of irbesartan. In the chronic study, treatments resumed for 3 days.

Glucose Transport Activity
In the acute study, animals were again food restricted as described above before receiving a second acute dose of irbesartan. In the chronic study, animals were likewise food restricted. Between 8:00 and 10:00 AM, 1 hour after the second acute dose or {approx}12 hours after final chronic treatment with irbesartan, animals were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg IP). Both epitrochlearis muscles and 1 soleus muscle were surgically removed and prepared for in vitro incubation. Epitrochlearis muscles were incubated intact, whereas soleus muscles were prepared in strips (weight, {approx}25 mg).24 Glucose transport activity, assessed as 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake, was determined in the absence of presence of insulin (13.3 nmol/L) exactly as described previously.710,19

Muscle GLUT-4 Protein
In the chronic study, the contralateral soleus and plantaris and the heart were removed, quickly frozen in liquid N2, weighed, and stored at -80°C until processed. Muscles and left ventricle of the heart were homogenized in 20 vol of ice-cold buffer containing 20 mmol/L HEPES, 1 mmol/L EDTA, and 250 mmol/L sucrose, pH 7.4. Total protein concentration was determined by use of the bicinchoninic acid method (Sigma). GLUT-4 protein was assayed as described previously.10

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SE. Significance of differences between multiple groups was assessed by ANOVA with a post hoc Fisher Protected Least Significant Difference Test. Differences between groups were determined by an unpaired Student t test. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 probability level.

An expanded Methods section can be found in an online data supplement available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Acute Administration of Irbesartan
Final body weights were similar in the obese, vehicle-treated group (310±6 g) and in the obese groups treated acutely with irbesartan at 5 (319±8 g), 25 (313±8 g), or 50 (308±4 g) mg/kg. Glucose and insulin responses during an OGTT in the acutely treated groups are shown in Figure 1, top. The lowest dose of irbesartan (5 mg/kg) did not alter these responses. Compared with the vehicle-treated group, acute irbesartan treatment at 25 mg/kg resulted in a 14% lower (P<0.05) glucose value at the 120-minute point, whereas acute treatment with 50 mg/kg caused lower (10% to 19%; P<0.05) glucose values at 30, 90, and 120 minutes. Only acute irbesartan treatment at 50 mg/kg caused significantly lower (17% to 21%; P<0.05) insulin responses during the course of the OGTT.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of acute treatment of obese Zucker rats with various doses of irbesartan (IRB) on glucose and insulin responses during OGTT, glucose (mmol/L · min) and insulin (nmol/L · min) AUC, and glucose-insulin index (mmol/L · nmol/L · min2 · 102). Values are mean±SE for 5 to 8 animals per group. *P<0.05 vs obese vehicle-treated group.

Total areas under the curve (AUC) for these glucose and insulin responses and the glucose-insulin index (the product of glucose AUC and insulin AUC; a reduction in this value reflects an increase in whole-body insulin sensitivity25), are presented in Figure 1, bottom. Whereas the reductions in the obese group treated with 25 mg/kg irbesartan did not reach statistical significance, animals treated with 50 mg/kg irbesartan displayed significant reductions in glucose (13%; P<0.05) and insulin (15%; P<0.05) AUC. The glucose-insulin index was significantly reduced (17%; P<0.05) in the 25 mg/kg irbesartan-treated group, with the greatest diminution (26%; P<0.05) in this variable observed in the 50 mg/kg irbesartan-treated group.

To identify the potential cellular locus for the improvements in whole-body insulin sensitivity brought about by acute irbesartan treatment, insulin action on isolated skeletal muscle from the obese animals was assessed (Figure 2). In the epitrochlearis, which consists primarily of less-insulin-sensitive type IIb fibers,24,26 no increases were seen either in the rate of insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake (Figure 2, top left) or in the insulin-mediated increase (increase over basal) in 2-DG uptake (Figure 2, top right) after acute irbesartan treatment. In contrast, acute treatment of the obese animals with irbesartan was associated with enhanced insulin action in the soleus, which consists mainly of more-insulin-responsive type I fibers.24,27 After animals were treated with either 25 or 50 mg/kg of irbesartan, both the rates of insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake (18% for both dosages; P<0.05) and insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake (41% and 50%, respectively; both P<0.05) were increased in the soleus. Enhancement of insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake in soleus but not epitrochlearis after acute treatment with irbesartan was correlated significantly (r=-0.732; P<0.05) with improvement in whole-body insulin sensitivity (reduction in glucose-insulin index; Figure 3).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of acute treatment of obese Zucker rats with various doses of irbesartan on glucose transport activity in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles. 2-DG uptake was assessed in absence (left top and bottom, shaded bars) or presence (left top and bottom, black bars) of insulin (13.3 nmol/L). Increase above basal due to insulin for 2-DG uptake also was calculated in the acute vehicle-treated group (open bars) and each of the acute irbesartan-treated groups (shaded and filled bars, right top and bottom). Data are mean±SE for 5 to 8 animals per group. *P<0.05 vs obese vehicle-treated group.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Correlation between insulin-mediated glucose transport activity in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles and glucose-insulin index after acute administration of irbesartan to obese Zucker rats. Data are taken from Figures 1 and 2. Regression equations for these correlations were y=-0.0257x+129.7 (r=-0.053; P=NS) for epitrochlearis and y=-1.199x+574.2 (r=-0.732; P<0.05) for soleus.

Chronic Administration of Irbesartan
The highest effective acute dose, 50 mg/kg, was chosen to assess the effect of chronic irbesartan treatment on insulin action in the obese Zucker rat. Final body weights did not differ between groups (Table). The positive systemic influence of chronic irbesartan treatment was demonstrated by a 18%-lower heart weight in the irbesartan-treated versus the vehicle-treated group. Whereas chronic irbesartan treatment elicited a significant lowering (14%; P<0.05) of plasma glucose in food-restricted obese animals, this treatment regimen did not significantly alter plasma insulin or free fatty acid levels (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Chronic Irbesartan Treatment on Final Body Weight, Heart Weight, and Basal Plasma Glucose, Insulin, and Free Fatty Acid Concentrations

Chronic irbesartan treatment lowered significantly both glucose (17% to 21%; P<0.05) and insulin (25% at 90 minutes and 29% at 120 minutes, P<0.05) responses during OGTT (Figure 4, top). Likewise, the glucose (19%; P<0.05) and insulin (21%; P<0.05) AUC and the glucose-insulin index (34%; P<0.05) were all significantly less in the chronic irbesartan-treated versus the vehicle-treated obese groups (Figure 4, bottom).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of chronic treatment of obese Zucker rats with 50 mg/kg irbesartan for 21 consecutive days on glucose and insulin responses during OGTT, glucose (mmol/L · min) and insulin (nmol/L · min) AUC, and glucose-insulin index (mmol/L · nmol/L · min2 · 102). Data are mean±SE for 5 to 6 animals per group. *P<0.05 vs obese vehicle-treated group.

Insulin-stimulated rate of 2-DG uptake and insulin-mediated increase in 2-DG uptake in both epitrochlearis (21% and 32%, respectively; P<0.05) and soleus (40% and 73%, respectively; P<0.05) muscles were significantly enhanced after chronic irbesartan treatment (Figure 5). These improvements in insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake in skeletal muscle after chronic irbesartan treatment were significantly correlated with enhancement of whole-body insulin sensitivity, as assessed by reduction in the glucose-insulin index (epitrochlearis, r=-0.677; soleus, r=-0.892; both P<0.05; Figure 6). Importantly, chronic treatment with irbesartan elicited a significant enhancement (22%; P<0.05) in GLUT-4 protein level in the soleus muscle (Figure 7). Similarly small but significant increases in GLUT-4 protein expression after chronic Ang II receptor antagonism were observed in the mixed-type IIa/IIb plantaris muscle (20%; P<0.05) and in myocardium (15%; P<0.05).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of chronic treatment of obese Zucker rats with 50 mg/kg of irbesartan for 21 days on glucose transport activity in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles. 2-DG uptake was assessed in absence (shaded bars) or presence (black bars) of insulin (13.3 nmol/L; left). Increase above basal due to insulin for 2-DG uptake was also calculated in the obese vehicle-treated (open bars) and obese irbesartan-treated (filled bars) groups (right). Values are mean±SE for 5 to 6 animals per group. *P<0.05 vs obese vehicle-treated group.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Correlation between insulin-mediated glucose transport activity in isolated epitrochlearis and soleus muscles and glucose-insulin index after chronic administration of irbesartan to obese Zucker rats. Data are taken from Figures 4 and 5. Regression equations for these correlations were y=-0.0.378x+208.6 (r=-0.677; P<0.05) for epitrochlearis and y=-1.840x+759.3 (r=-0.892; P<0.05) for soleus.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of chronic treatment of obese Zucker rats with 50 mg/kg of irbesartan for 21 consecutive days on GLUT-4 protein levels in soleus, plantaris, and myocardium. Values are mean±SE for 5 to 6 animals per group. *P<0.05 vs obese vehicle-treated group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present investigation, we assessed the potential role of Ang II receptor antagonism using irbesartan in the modulation of whole-body and skeletal-muscle glucose disposal in an animal model of obesity-associated insulin resistance, the obese Zucker rat. We have confirmed our previous observation19 that acute oral administration of an AT1-specific Ang II receptor antagonist does not appreciably enhance insulin action on glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle comprised primarily of less-insulin-responsive type IIb fibers (epitrochlearis) from the obese Zucker rat. However, we report here for the first time that acute administration of an Ang II receptor antagonist increases, in a dosage-dependent fashion, insulin action on glucose transport in skeletal muscle made up of more-insulin-responsive type I fibers from soleus (Figure 2). Chronic administration of irbesartan clearly elicited the expected systemic effects, as evidenced by the substantial regression of cardiac mass in these obese animals (Table), consistent with previous clinical findings.4 Moreover, chronic administration of this Ang II receptor antagonist elicited significant increases in insulin action on glucose transport in both epitrochlearis and soleus muscles (Figure 5), with the absolute effect of this intervention being greater in the latter muscle. These findings underscore the importance of assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive interventions on metabolic variables in muscles that consist of a variety of fiber-type compositions, given that fiber type-dependent alterations in these metabolic responses may be apparent.

Whole-body insulin sensitivity, as reflected in the reduced glucose-insulin index by use of glucose and insulin responses during OGTT, was significantly enhanced in obese Zucker rats by acute administration of irbesartan (Figure 1) and, to an even greater extent, after chronic treatment with this Ang II receptor antagonist (Figure 4). At least part of these increases in whole-body glucose disposal was the result of an enhanced capacity for insulin-mediated glucose transport in skeletal muscle, given that significant correlations between the glucose-insulin index and the insulin-mediated increase in 2-DG uptake were found for the soleus after acute irbesartan treatment (Figure 3) and for both the epitrochlearis and soleus after chronic Ang II receptor antagonism (Figure 6). Whereas a portion of these improvements in whole-body insulin action can be attributed to the well-documented hemodynamic modifications elicited by Ang II receptor antagonists,35 both the acute and chronic treatments with irbesartan resulted in upregulation of the skeletal-muscle glucose transport system: increases observed in insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake in the epitrochlearis (chronic treatment only) and soleus (acute and chronic treatments) were assessed in vitro and therefore were independent of hemodynamic influences. In addition, in light of the small but significant effects of chronic irbesartan treatment for reduction of fasting plasma glucose (Table), the possibility exists that Ang II receptor antagonism may enhance hepatic insulin sensitivity and diminish hepatic glucose production in the fasting state.

Present findings support and extend previous investigations that demonstrate that inhibition of Ang II formation, either through administration of ACE inhibitors6,810,1318 or through specific inhibition of Ang II action at AT1 receptors,11,12,20 frequently is associated with enhancement of whole-body insulin sensitivity in a variety of insulin-resistant animal models or in insulin-resistant humans with essential hypertension. Whereas the vasodilatory effects of these interventions account for some of the whole-body metabolic improvements,3,4 the present results point toward an additional important contribution of the insulin-dependent glucose transport system in skeletal muscle to the beneficial metabolic effects of these compounds. Reports of the metabolic neutrality of Ang II receptor antagonists in conditions of hypertension11,18,2830 may be related to the apparent dosage-dependency of the effects of these compounds on insulin action (see Figures 1 through 3); dosages that elicit lowering of blood pressure were ineffective for bringing about increased insulin sensitivity. Future investigations should be designed to address this possibility specifically.

The role of the whole-muscle expression of GLUT-4 protein in the capacity of that muscle for insulin-mediated glucose transport activity has long been recognized.24,31 In the present investigation, we found that chronic antagonism of Ang II receptors caused small (15% to 22%) but significant increases in GLUT-4 protein expression in both oxidative (soleus) and substantially glycolytic (plantaris) skeletal muscle and in the highly oxidative myocardium (Figure 7). At least in the soleus muscle, this increase in GLUT-4 protein could have contributed to enhancement of insulin action on glucose transport after chronic irbesartan treatment. This increase in muscle GLUT-4 protein after chronic Ang II receptor antagonism is consistent with the concept that Ang II may function as a negative modulator of GLUT-4 gene expression in these tissues, in parallel with its known effects on gene expression and cellular phenotypic alterations in the vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells, and cardiac myocytes.32

We have observed that chronic administration of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril can induce small (25% to 30%) increases in GLUT-4 protein expression in skeletal muscle of the obese Zucker rat.8,10 This induction of GLUT-4 protein in insulin-resistant rat skeletal muscle could not be reproduced with chronic administration of bradykinin,33 the level of which is increased by ACE inhibitors.6 However, the present findings support the hypothesis that the ability of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril to enhance GLUT-4 protein expression in muscle of the obese Zucker rat may be reliant on the ability of this compound to effectively diminish formation and action of Ang II.

Chronic administration of ACE inhibitors to obese Zucker rats results in a significant diminution of the elevated level of fasting plasma free fatty acids,810 and this decrease in free fatty acids may be mechanistically linked to the improvement in insulin action on skeletal-muscle glucose transport.34 Interestingly, a lowering of plasma free fatty acids can be achieved with chronic administration of bradykinin33 but not with chronic administration of an Ang II receptor antagonist (Table). These findings are consistent with the interpretation that the lipid-lowering effects of ACE inhibitors are mediated by an enhancement of bradykinin action and not by a reduction in Ang II action. Furthermore, it is clear that the enhancement of insulin action brought about by chronic Ang II antagonism is not mediated by a reduction in the inhibitory effects of circulating free fatty acids.

Results of the present investigation are consistent with and complement the findings of Richey et al.23 These investigators demonstrated that acute infusion of Ang II into normal dogs during euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp led to a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity and that this Ang II-induced insulin resistance probably developed because of direct inhibition of glucose transport by the myocyte. Our findings that the acute administration of irbesartan, which would prevent any negative action of Ang II on cellular glucose transport, led to an enhancement of insulin-stimulated skeletal-muscle glucose transport (at least in type I muscle), is entirely consistent with this hypothesis. What remains to be determined is the exact cellular mechanism for this deleterious effect of Ang II on insulin action. Acute administration of Ang II is known to cause inhibition of insulin-stimulated phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase activity in rat heart.35 However, whether this mechanism for Ang II-induced impairment of insulin signaling is functional in skeletal muscle and whether the antagonism of Ang II receptors removes this inhibitory effect of Ang II in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle of the obese Zucker rat are presently unknown.

In summary, the present investigation has demonstrated that acute administration of irbesartan, a specific Ang II (AT1-subtype) receptor antagonist, to the insulin-resistant obese Zucker rat induces dose-dependent improvement of whole-body insulin sensitivity, at least in part because of an enhancement of glucose transport in type I skeletal muscle. Moreover, chronic administration of irbesartan elicited an even greater improvement in whole-body insulin sensitivity, which was associated with increased glucose transport in both type I and type IIb skeletal muscles. This chronic Ang II receptor antagonism also elicited significant increases in GLUT-4 protein expression in skeletal muscle and myocardium. The results support the use of Ang II receptor antagonists to treat the hypertension and insulin resistance of skeletal-muscle glucose metabolism associated with insulin-resistance syndrome.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The present study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.

Received February 2, 2000; first decision March 7, 2001; accepted April 12, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 1991; 14: 173–194.[Abstract]
  2. Julius S. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral evidence of multifaceted pathophysiology in human hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990; 15 (suppl 5): S53–S58.
  3. Weber MA. Interrupting the renin-angiotensin system: the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 189S–194S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2000; 14 (suppl 1): S73–S86.
  5. Burnier M, Brunner HR. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Lancet. 2000; 355: 637–645.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Uehara M, Kishikawa H, Isami S, Kisanuki K, Ohkubo Y, Miyamura N, Miyata T, Yano T, Shichiri M. Effect on insulin sensitivity of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors with or without a sulfhydryl group: bradykinin may improve insulin resistance in dogs and humans. Diabetologia. 1994; 37: 300–307.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Henriksen EJ, Jacob S. Effects of captopril on glucose transport activity in skeletal muscle of obese Zucker rats. Metabolism. 1995; 44: 267–272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Jacob S, Henriksen EJ, Fogt DJ, Dietze GJ. Effects of trandolapril and verapamil on glucose transport in insulin-resistant rat skeletal muscle. Metabolism. 1996; 45: 535–541.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dal Ponte DB, Fogt DL, Jacob S, Henriksen EJ. Interactions of captopril and verapamil on glucose transport in insulin-resistant rat skeletal muscle. Metabolism. 1998; 47: 982–987.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Steen MS, Foianini KR, Youngblood EB, Kinnick TR, Jacob S, Henriksen EJ. Interactions of exercise training and ACE inhibition on insulin action in obese Zucker rats. J Appl Physiol. 1999; 86: 2044–2051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nakagawa H, Daihara M, Tamakawa H, Nozue T, Kawahara K. Effects of quinapril and losartan on insulin sensitivity in genetic hypertensive rats with different metabolic abnormalities. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 34: 28–33.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Higashiura K, Ura N, Takada T, Li Y, Torii T, Togashi N, Takada M, Takizawa H, Shimamoto K. The effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist on insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats. Am J Hypertens. 2000; 13: 290–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Jauch KW, Hartl W, Günther B, Wicklmayr M, Rett K, Dietze G. Captopril enhances insulin responsiveness of forearm muscle tissue in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Invest. 1987; 17: 448–454.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Torlone E, Rambotti AM, Perriello G, Botta G, Santeusanio F, Brunetti P, Bolli GB. ACE-inhibition increases hepatic and extrahepatic sensitivity to insulin in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. Diabetologia. 1991; 34: 119–125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Pollare T. Insulin sensitivity and blood lipids during antihypertensive treatment with special reference to ACE inhibition. J Diabet Complications. 1990; 4: 75–78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Paolisso G, Gambardella A, Verza M, D‘Amore A, Sgambato S, Varricchio M. ACE inhibition improves insulin-sensitivity in aged insulin-resistant hypertensive patients. J Human Hypertens. 1992; 6: 175–179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Vuirinen-Markkola H, Yki-Järvinen H. Antihypertensive therapy with enalapril improves glucose storage and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 1995; 44: 85–89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Frossard M, Joukhadar C, Steffen G, Schmid R, Eichler HG, Muller M. Paracrine effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme and angiotensin II-receptor inhibition on transcapillary glucose transport in humans. Life Sci. 2000; 66: PL147–PL154.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Henriksen EJ, Jacob S, Kinnick TR, Youngblood EB, Schmit MB, Dietze GJ. ACE inhibition and glucose transport in insulin-resistant muscle: roles of bradykinin and nitric oxide. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: R332–R336.
  20. Sasaki K, Kushiro T, Nakagawa S, Kanmatsuse K. Effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonism on insulin sensitivity and sympathetic activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats [in Japanese]. Nippon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 1999; 41: 692–696.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Higashiura K, Ura N, Miyazaki Y, Shimamoto K. Effect of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, candesartan, on insulin resistance and pressor mechanisms in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1999; 13 (suppl 1): S71–S74.
  22. Rao RH. Effects of angiotensin II on insulin sensitivity and fasting glucose metabolism in rats. Am J Hypertens. 1994; 7: 655–660.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Richey JM, Ader M, Moore D, Bergman RN. Angiotensin II induces insulin resistance independent of changes in interstitial insulin. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: E920–E926.
  24. Henriksen EJ, Bourey RE, Rodnick KJ, Koranyi L, Permutt MA, Holloszy JO. Glucose transporter protein content and glucose transport capacity in rat skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol. 1990; 259: E593–E598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cortez MY, Torgan CE, Brozinick JT, Ivy JL. Insulin resistance of obese Zucker rats exercise trained at two difference intensities. Am J Physiol. 1991; 261: E613–E619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rodnick KJ, Henriksen EJ, James DE, Holloszy JO. Exercise training, glucose transporters, and glucose transport in rat skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol. 1992; 262: C9–C14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ariano MA, Armstrong RB, Edgerton VR. Hindlimb muscle fiber populations of five animals. J Histochem Cytochem. 1973; 21: 51–55.[Abstract]
  28. Laakso M, Karjalainen L, Lempiainen-Kuosa P. Effects of losartan in insulin sensitivity in hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 392–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fogari R, Zoppi A, Corradi L, Lazzari P, Mugellini A, Lusardi P. Comparative effects of lisinopril and losartan on insulin sensitivity in the treatment of non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 46: 467–471.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Harada N, Ohnaka M, Sakamoto S, Niwa Y, Nakaya Y. Cilnidipine improves insulin sensitivity in the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty rat, a model of spontaneous NIDDM. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1999; 13: 519–523.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Kern MJ, Wells JA, Stephens JM, Elton CW, Friedman JE, Tapscott B, Pekala PH, Dohm GL. Insulin responsiveness in skeletal muscle is determined by glucose transporter (Glut4) protein level. Biochem J. 1990; 270: 397–400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kim S, Iwao H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin I-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 11–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Henriksen EJ, Jacob S, Fogt DL, Dietze GJ. Effect of chronic bradykinin administration on insulin action in an animal model of insulin resistance. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: R40–R45.
  34. Boden G. Role of fatty acids in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and NIDDM. Diabetes. 1997; 46: 3–10.[Abstract]
  35. Folli F, Saad MJ, Velloso LA, Hansen H, Feener EP, Kahn CR. Crosstalk between insulin and angiotensin II signalling systems. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1999; 107: 133–139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. P. Jayasooriya, M. L. Mathai, L. L. Walker, D. P. Begg, D. A. Denton, D. Cameron-Smith, G. F. Egan, M. J. McKinley, P. D. Rodger, A. J. Sinclair, et al.
Mice lacking angiotensin-converting enzyme have increased energy expenditure, with reduced fat mass and improved glucose clearance
PNAS, May 6, 2008; 105(18): 6531 - 6536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Ruiz, P. Singh, S. C. Thomson, K. Munger, R. C. Blantz, and F. B. Gabbai
L-arginine-induced glomerular hyperfiltration response: the roles of insulin and ANG II
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): R1744 - R1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Wei, J. R. Sowers, S. E. Clark, W. Li, C. M. Ferrario, and C. S. Stump
Angiotensin II-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance mediated by NF-{kappa}B activation via NADPH oxidase
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2008; 294(2): E345 - E351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. M. V. de Cavanagh, L. Ferder, J. E. Toblli, B. Piotrkowski, I. Stella, C. G. Fraga, and F. Inserra
Renal mitochondrial impairment is attenuated by AT1 blockade in experimental Type I diabetes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H456 - H465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Z. V. Wang and P. E. Scherer
Adiponectin, Cardiovascular Function, and Hypertension
Hypertension, January 1, 2008; 51(1): 8 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
E Krusinova, M Klementova, J Kopecky, P Wohl, L Kazdova, P Mlejnek, M Pravenec, M Hill, and T Pelikanova
Effect of acute hyperinsulinaemia with and without angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on resistin and adiponectin concentrations and expressions in healthy subjects
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 443 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. J. Henriksen
Improvement of insulin sensitivity by antagonism of the renin-angiotensin system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R974 - R980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Gilliam-Davis, V. S. Payne, S. O. Kasper, E. N. Tommasi, M. E. Robbins, and D. I. Diz
Long-term AT1 receptor blockade improves metabolic function and provides renoprotection in Fischer-344 rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1327 - H1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. F. Giani, M. M. Gironacci, M. C. Munoz, C. Pena, D. Turyn, and F. P. Dominici
Angiotensin-(1 7) stimulates the phosphorylation of JAK2, IRS-1 and Akt in rat heart in vivo: role of the AT1 and Mas receptors
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1154 - H1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H.-M. Jin and Y. Pan
Angiotensin type-1 receptor blockade with losartan increases insulin sensitivity and improves glucose homeostasis in subjects with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1943 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. H. Siddiqui and T. Hussain
Enhanced AT1 receptor-mediated vasocontractile response to ANG II in endothelium-denuded aorta of obese Zucker rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): H1722 - H1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. K. Mehta and K. K. Griendling
Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C82 - C97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. S. Edgerton, K. M. Stettler, D. W. Neal, M. Scott, L. Bowen, W. Wilson, C. H. Hobbs, C. Leach, T. R. Strack, and A. D. Cherrington
Inhalation of Human Insulin Is Associated with Improved Insulin Action Compared with Subcutaneous Injection and Endogenous Secretion in Dogs
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1258 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. Iwai, H.-S. Li, R. Chen, T. Shiuchi, L. Wu, L.-J. Min, J.-M. Li, M. Tsuda, J. Suzuki, Y. Tomono, et al.
Calcium Channel Blocker Azelnidipine Reduces Glucose Intolerance in Diabetic Mice via Different Mechanism Than Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Olmesartan
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1081 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
D. S. Edgerton, A. D. Cherrington, P. Williams, D. W. Neal, M. Scott, L. Bowen, W. Wilson, C. H. Hobbs, C. Leach, M.-c. Kuo, et al.
Inhalation of Human Insulin (Exubera) Augments the Efficiency of Muscle Glucose Uptake In Vivo
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3604 - 3610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Wei, J. R. Sowers, R. Nistala, H. Gong, G. M.-E. Uptergrove, S. E. Clark, E. M. Morris, N. Szary, C. Manrique, and C. S. Stump
Angiotensin II-induced NADPH Oxidase Activation Impairs Insulin Signaling in Skeletal Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35137 - 35146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Kobayashi, Y. Hayashi, K. Taguchi, T. Matsumoto, and K. Kamata
ANG II enhances contractile responses via PI3-kinase p110{delta} pathway in aortas from diabetic rats with systemic hyperinsulinemia
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H846 - H853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. S. Hermann, W. Li, H. Dominguez, N. Ihlemann, C. Rask-Madsen, A. Major-Pedersen, D. B. Nielsen, K. W. Hansen, M. Hawkins, L. Kober, et al.
Quinapril Treatment Increases Insulin-Stimulated Endothelial Function and Adiponectin Gene Expression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
S. O. Kasper, C. S. Carter, C. M. Ferrario, D. Ganten, L. F. Ferder, W. E. Sonntag, P. E. Gallagher, and D. I. Diz
Growth, metabolism, and blood pressure disturbances during aging in transgenic rats with altered brain renin-angiotensin systems
Physiol Genomics, November 17, 2005; 23(3): 311 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
C. S. Carter, G. Onder, S. B. Kritchevsky, and M. Pahor
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Intervention in Elderly Persons: Effects on Body Composition and Physical Performance
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(11): 1437 - 1446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocrinology