This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pauca, A. L. Articles by Kon, N. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pauca, A. L. Articles by Kon, N. D.

(Hypertension. 2001;38:932.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Fourth Workshop on Structure and Function of Large Arteries

Prospective Evaluation of a Method for Estimating Ascending Aortic Pressure From the Radial Artery Pressure Waveform

Alfredo L. Pauca; Michael F. O’Rourke; Neal D. Kon

From the Anesthesiology Department (A.L.P) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (N.D.K.), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; St. Vincent’s Clinic/University of New South Wales (M.F.O.), Sydney, Australia.

Correspondence to Michael F. O’Rourke, Professor of Medicine, Medical Professorial Unit, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia. E-mail M.ORourke{at}unsw.edu.au

Abstract

Abstract—— Pressure wave reflection in the upper limb causes amplification of the arterial pulse so that radial systolic and pulse pressures are greater than in the ascending aorta. Wave transmission properties in the upper limbs (in contrast to the descending aorta and lower limbs) change little with age, disease, and drug therapy in adult humans. Such consistency has led to use of a generalized transfer function to synthesize the ascending aortic pressure pulse from the radial pulse. Validity of this approach was tested for estimation of aortic systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean pressures from the radial pressure waveform. Ascending aortic and radial pressure waveforms were recorded simultaneously at cardiac surgery, before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, with matched, fluid-filled manometer systems in 62 patients under control conditions and during nitroglycerin infusion. Aortic pressure pulse waves, generated from the radial pulse, showed agreement with the measured aortic pulse waves with respect to systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean pressures, with mean differences <1 mm Hg. Control differences in Bland-Altman plots for mean±SD in mm Hg were systolic, 0.0±4.4; diastolic, 0.6±1.7; pulse, -0.7±4.2; and mean pressure, -0.5±2.0. For nitroglycerin infusion, differences respectively were systolic, -0.2±4.3; diastolic, 0.6±1.7; pulse, -0.8±4.1; and mean pressure, -0.4±1.8. Differences were within specified limits of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation SP10 criteria. In contrast, differences between recorded radial and aortic systolic and pulse pressures were well outside the criteria (respectively, 15.7±8.4 and 16.3±8.5 for control and 14.5±7.3 and 15.1±7.3 mm Hg for nitroglycerin). Use of a generalized transfer function to synthesize radial artery pressure waveforms can provide substantially equivalent values of aortic systolic, pulse, mean, and diastolic pressures.

Key Words: aorta • blood pressure monitoring • hemodynamics • nitroglycerin

Recent clinical and epidemiological studies, while endorsing the importance of arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease, have directed attention to pulsatile phenomena and arterial stiffness by demonstrating the greater importance of systolic and pulse pressures over diastolic and mean pressures in older human adults.^1–4 The field currently is confused.^5,6 One source of confusion is the difference in pulse pressure and systolic pressure between central and peripheral arteries, even when mean and diastolic pressures appear identical.⁷ Such differences can lead to errors in assessment of myocardial oxygen requirements⁸ and of left ventricular load and hypertrophy, as well as to differences in the actions of different vasodilator agents.^9,10

Different methods have been introduced to generate indices of left ventricular load from the peripheral pressure pulse. One of those involves synthesis of the ascending aortic pressure pulse (and so left ventricular pressure during systole) through convolution of the radial artery pressure pulse in the frequency domain, with a generalized transfer function used to describe the hydraulic properties of blood vessels in the upper limb.^11–15

The present study was undertaken to evaluate such a system as contained in a commercially available device (SphygmoCor, PWV Medical). The study was undertaken prospectively on a consecutive series of anesthetized adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with the use of fluid-filled manometer systems with adequate frequency response that had been carefully matched before each study. Simultaneously recorded aortic and radial pressure waveforms were digitized at collection, with ensemble-averaged data compared over at least 1 respiratory cycle before and after intensive vasodilation and with wave-by-wave analysis used for those patients with cardiac irregularity.

Method

Collection and Presentation of Clinical Data
Patients
The study was conducted on 62 consecutive patients between November 4, 1998, and April 14, 1999. The study was approved by the institution’s clinical research practices committee. Individual patients scheduled for surgery were approached, and informed consent was given. Hemodynamically significant brachial, subclavian, or innominate stenosis was excluded by ensuring that blood pressures were the same on both sides and that the radial pulse was identical by palpation in the left and right arms. The study was initiated in 62 consecutive patients and was completed in all. Data on all patients are summarized in Table 1.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Clinical Features of the 62 Patients in the Study

Procedure and Manometric System
Similar equipment and methodology were used as in the previous study,⁷ including the fluid-filled manometer systems. Radial artery cannulation was established as a routine, before induction of anesthesia, through a 5.1-cm, 20-gauge Teflon catheter attached to a manometer that was set at midchest level. Observations recorded for the study were taken 60 to 90 minutes after anesthesia had been induced. Isoflurane (0.5% to 2%, inspired) was the primary anesthetic. Fentanyl (6 to 12 µg/kg) and midazolam (100 to 120 µg/kg) were adjuvants. Pancuronium was used for muscle relaxation. After the chest had been opened, the ascending aorta had been prepared for insertion of the cardiopulmonary bypass cannulas, and heparin (300 U/kg) had been given, a 20-gauge catheter similar to that used to record pressure from the radial artery was placed in the ascending aorta at the site of intended cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Recordings were obtained simultaneously during a period of 2 to 5 minutes while the surgical procedure was diverted away from the monitoring lines.

The aortic and radial cannulas both faced upstream. Both aortic and radial catheters were 91.4 cm long, with internal diameter of 1.8 mm and wall thickness of 0.9 mm. Catheters were attached to matched Transpac manometers (Abbott Critical Care Systems, Abbott Laboratories). Transducers were calibrated statically with a mercury manometer and maintained at the same vertical level. Frequency response and dampening coefficient were obtained by the flush method at the beginning and end of the recording period in each patient, with confirmation of natural frequency >20 Hz and dampening coefficient >0.3.^16,17

After control recordings of aortic and radial pressure waveforms were obtained over a period of at least 20 seconds, nitroglycerin (NTG) was infused intravenously at a dosage of up to 16 µg · kg^-1 · min^-1 (mean, 6 µg · kg^-1 · min^-1) with the aim of reducing radial systolic arterial pressure to 100 mm Hg. This level was considered ideal at our institution to reduce the risk of aortic damage and bleeding during aortic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Further recordings of aortic and radial artery pressures were again taken over a period of at least 20 seconds before the aortic cannula was removed and the large-bore aortic cannula was inserted at the same site.

Data Handling and Analysis
Radial and aortic pressure recordings, obtained simultaneously, were digitized at 200 per second and stored in a computer for subsequent offline analysis. To compare the actual measured aortic pressure waveform with the estimated aortic pressure waveform and to compare the parameters derived from each of the aortic waveforms, the following data analysis procedure was adopted.

Both the invasively recorded radial artery and the invasively recorded aortic 200-Hz pressure data were converted offline to 128-Hz data (as required for digital data input to SphygmoCor) by linear interpolation.

The radial artery pressure waveform data were then processed by the SphygmoCor radial/aortic transform software module to produce the estimated aortic pressure waveform.^6,11 The process involved convolution of the radial waveform by a generalized transfer function, which was taken to characterize pressure wave transformation in the upper limb.^12–15,18 The series of estimated aortic waveforms, together with the series of radial waveforms from which these were derived, were each ensemble-averaged over an 8-second period into a single calibrated waveform.

The corresponding set of simultaneously recorded aortic pressure waves were handled in a similar process that applied no modulus or phase correction but produced a single calibrated, ensemble-averaged aortic pressure waveform whose features could be compared directly with the corresponding ensemble-averaged radial and estimated aortic waveforms by the feature extraction processes.

Three patients had irregular rhythms throughout the recording period (2 atrial fibrillation and 1 with multiple supraventricular ectopic beats). The same process was applied in these patients, with a single ensemble-averaged pressure wave generated to represent radial, estimated aortic, and measured aortic waveforms. Comparisons were made with the single averaged waveforms. In addition, in these 3 patients with irregular heart rhythm, and for each intervention, directly recorded radial, directly recorded aortic, and estimated aortic waves were compared on a wave-by-wave basis for a minimum of 10 seconds. Individual waveforms were compared with respect to systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and pulse pressure.

Analysis of Ensemble-Averaged Data
Two separate data sets were compared: under control conditions immediately after insertion of the aortic cannula and after intravenous infusion of NTG to reduce arterial pressure. Comparisons were made of the above parameters from the actual and estimated aortic waveforms (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Comparisons of Pressure From Actual and Estimated Waveforms

The ensemble-averaged wave comparison was applied to the data from all 62 patients, including the 3 with irregular heart rhythms. The approach recognizes the difficulties in characterizing an "average" pulse waveform with the heart beating irregularly, as in atrial fibrillation, but acknowledges the fact that clinicians still describe averages of heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output in the presence of irregular heart rhythm.

Results

In all patients, manometric matching was checked by displaying the same radial tracing from the 2 manometers on the monitoring screen, with confirmation that these overlapped. If there was any significant disparity, the study was abandoned and the operative procedure proceeded in routine fashion. In 37 patients, time permitted entry of the data into the computer for Bland-Altman analysis.¹⁹ Differences were (±SD) 0.2±1.5, 0.1±0.7, 0.3±1.7, and 0.2±1.5 mm Hg for mean, pulse, systolic, and diastolic pressures, respectively (Figure 1).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Test for matching of measurement systems. In all 62 patients, tracings were shown to overlie before the aorta was cannulated, and frequency response determined. Bland-Altman plots show difference between mean, systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures when the same radial pressure signal was recorded by both manometers and with the same analytical process as applied to the aortic and radial waveforms. Data were collected for this analysis in 37 of the 62 patients.

Ensemble-averaged waves were generated for measured aortic, estimated aortic, and measured radial pressure in all 62 patients before and during NTG infusion. In general, there was correspondence between measured and estimated aortic waveforms before and during NTG but a lack of correspondence with the radial waveform, especially during NTG infusion.

Figure 2 shows Bland-Altman comparisons of systolic and diastolic, mean, and pulse pressures for estimated and measured aortic waves in the 62 patients before and during NTG infusion. Figure 2 also shows comparisons of the same indices in measured aortic and radial waves. Mean difference and SD of all indices are given in Table 2, with control and treatment results listed separately. Convolution of the radial pulse into the estimated aortic pressure reduced both the mean difference and SD of the systolic and pulse pressure indices compared with measured aortic pressure. In the 3 patients with irregular heart rhythm, indices determined from the ensemble-averaged waves fell within those obtained within the entire group and did not constitute any of the outlying points. When individual waveforms were compared (Figure 3), the convolutional process was found to effectively track measured aortic pressure and its fluctuations under control conditions and with NTG infusion.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Bland-Altman plots for all 62 patients before and during NTG infusion for systolic pressure (SP), diastolic pressure (DP), mean pressure (MP), and pulse pressure (PP). Comparisons between measured radial and measured aortic pressure waves (top) and between estimated and measured aortic pressure waves (bottom) are shown. M indicates mean.

View larger version (74K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Continuous pressure wave tracings in 3 patients with irregular heart rate (2 with atrial fibrillation, 1 with multiple supraventricular ectopic beats). Tracings at left are simultaneously recorded radial and aortic pressures; at right, measured and estimated aortic pressures (same wave train as at left). From top to bottom: patient 1, control; patient 1, NTG; patient 2, control; patient 2, NTG; patient 3, control; and patient 3, NTG.

Discussion

The earliest studies of arterial hemodynamics in humans, performed after diagnostic cardiac catheterization was introduced, confirmed observations from animal experimental studies²⁰ that the ascending aortic pressure wave during systole is virtually identical to left ventricular pressure during ejection but that both are quite different from the systolic part of the pressure wave as recorded in the brachial, radial, and other peripheral arteries.^21–23 Such differences were attributed to wave travel and reflection in the systemic circulation and were shown to be substantial, especially in young adults, during tachycardia and physiological maneuvers such as Valsalva and prolonged expiration.^21,22 Subsequent studies confirmed these results and showed variable differences between ascending aortic and upper-limb pressure waves in older subjects and patients, especially those with tachycardia or hypotension or those undergoing vasodilator therapy.^6,11,24–26

Despite these findings, epidemiologists and clinicians have not yet embraced the notion of systematic error in measurement of peripheral systolic pressure with respect to events involving the left ventricle, aorta, and central (coronary and carotid) arteries. At least 3 recent studies published in major cardiological journals assumed that brachial systolic and pulse pressures were identical to aortic pressures.^27–29 Despite having relevant findings for ACE inhibitors in humans and experimental animals,^9–11 the recently reported HOPE study³⁰ did not consider the possibility that beneficial effects of an ACE inhibitor (over those predicted from trials of other agents) might be due to greater reduction of ascending aortic rather than brachial systolic pressure.³¹

Our interest in this field has evolved from long-term involvement with analysis of the arterial pulse in the frequency and time domains,^6,32 together with the experience of anesthesiologists who have long known that assessment of cardiac function from peripheral pulse tracings may be misleading.^7,8 Our view that the brachial vasculature (in contrast to the aorta) might be represented in adult humans by a generalized transfer function arose from the findings that upper-limb pulse wave velocity changes little with age,³³ upper-limb muscular arteries change little with age and hypertension,³⁴ and vasoactive agents such as NTG appear to have corresponding effects on indices of wave reflection in the ascending aorta and in the brachial and radial arteries.²⁶ These views were supported by noninvasive studies of central (carotid) and upper-limb pressure waves under different conditions³⁵ and by modeling studies.¹⁸ Formal studies of transfer function between the ascending aorta and upper-limb arteries showed relative consistency,^{12–15,25,36} including studies conducted with NTG used as a vasodilator agent. For the most part, these findings have been confirmed by others^13–15 who understandably had initially indicated strong skepticism.

The transfer function for convolving radial to aortic pressure that we have developed is incorporated in a commercial system (SphygmoCor, PWV Medical Sydney). Three previous validation studies^37–39 have been reported that used the original system. All gave results similar to those reported here, although in far smaller studies. All were identified as having possible deficiencies before commencement of the present study. In our initial study,³⁷ pressure waves were digitized by hand, and data were analyzed from a retrospectively collected series. In a second study,³⁸ changes in the estimated aortic wave mirrored those seen in the measured aortic pulse, but there were quantitative differences that could not be explained; one possible explanation was a mismatch between the catheter-tip manometer for aortic pressure recording and the fluid-filled catheter for radial recording. This was the reason for careful matching of manometric devices before data collection in the present study (Figure 1). In the third study,³⁹ the radial waveform was measured by applanation tonometry, as in validation studies of similar processes,^13–15 and therefore absolute values could not be calculated with precision.

In the present study, correspondence for matching between manometer systems was checked before recording of data in every patient (Figure 1) and was shown to be adequate. The difference between central (aortic) and peripheral (radial) systolic pressures was similar to that in our 2 previous studies^7,37 and was associated with a similar substantial difference in pulse pressure.

Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI SP10) criteria have been set for comparison of arterial pressures measured with different methods.⁴⁰ Mean values need to correspond by 5 mm Hg or less, with SD 8 mm Hg or less, in an appropriately large number of measurements (25 or more for invasive comparisons). For the present study, AAMI SP10 criteria were met for comparisons between estimated and measured aortic pressures both under control conditions and with NTG infusion (Figure 2; Table 2). AAMI SP10 criteria were met only for mean and diastolic pressure comparisons between radial and directly recorded aortic waveforms.

The present study appears to show substantial equivalence between the estimated aortic and measured aortic waveform when the estimated aortic waveform is convolved from the simultaneously recorded radial waveform by use of a generalized transfer function.

A process similar to that used here has been used by Harms et al⁴¹ to determine aortic pressure and cardiac output, and accuracy has been demonstrated in recumbent patients.

Summary
Ascending aortic and radial artery pressure waves were recorded simultaneously in 62 anesthetized patients before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, both before and during intravenous infusion of NTG, with fluid-filled manometer systems that had been carefully matched for dynamic and static accuracy. A generalized transfer function was used in a computerized process to generate ascending aortic pressure waveforms from the radial pulse; estimated aortic pulse waveforms were compared with simultaneously recorded aortic waves. Comparisons were made for systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressures of individual paired waveforms for patients with regular and irregular heart rhythms and in corresponding ensemble-averaged waveforms over a 10-second period for all.

As in previous studies, correspondence between aortic and radial diastolic and mean arterial pressures was good (±SD) (mean difference <1±<2 mm Hg), but for systolic and pulse pressures, correspondence was poor (mean difference 15±7 mm Hg) and well outside AAMI guidelines. In contrast, when estimated (from radial) and measured aortic pressure waveforms were compared, there was good correspondence, within AAMI requirements, for systolic (mean 0.0±4.4 mm Hg) and pulse (0.7±4.2 mm Hg) pressures, as well as for mean (0.5±2.0 mm Hg) and diastolic (0.6±1.7 mm Hg) pressures. Pressure differences remained of the same order during infusion of NTG.

For patients with irregular heart rhythm, values of systolic, pulse, mean, and diastolic pressures in estimated aortic waveforms agreed with measured aortic waveforms, within AAMI criteria. The system tested provides a substantially equivalent estimate of the ascending aortic systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressures under different conditions.

Received April 28, 2001; first decision June 18, 2001; accepted July 11, 2001.

References

1. Benetos A, Rudnichi A, Safar M, Guize L. Pulse pressure and cardiovascular mortality in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 560–564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999; 100: 354–360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. O’Rourke MF, Frohlich ED. Pulse pressure: is this a clinically useful risk factor? Hypertension. 1999; 34: 372–374.Editorial.[Free Full Text]

4. Breithaupt-Grogler K, Belz G. Epidemiology of arterial stiffness. Pathol Biol. 1999; 47: 604–613.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1245–1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries. 4th ed. London, UK: Arnold; 1997.

7. Pauca AL, Wallenhaupt SL, Kon ND, Tucker WY. Does radial artery pressure accurately reflect aortic pressure? Chest. 1992; 102: 1193–1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Moffitt EA, Sethna DH, Gray RJ, DeRobertis M, Matloff JM, Bussell JA. Rate-pressure product correlates poorly with myocardial oxygen consumption during anaesthesia in coronary patients. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1984; 31: 5–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Chen CH, Ting CT, Lin SJ, Hsu TL, Yin FCP, Siu CO, Chou P, Wang SP, Chang MS. Different effects of fosinopril and atenolol on wave reflections in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1034–1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Mitchell GF, Pfeffer MA, Finn PV, Pfeffer JM. Equipotent antihypertensive agents variously effect pulsatile hemodynamics and regression of cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2923–2929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. O’Rourke MF, Safar ME, Dzau V, eds. Arterial Vasodilation: Mechanisms and Therapy. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1993.

12. Karamanoglou M, O’Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly RP. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 160–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FCP, Maughan L, Kass D. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure: validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1827–1836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Kass DA, Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Maughan WL, Yin FCP. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure data. Circulation. 1998; 98: 186–187.Letter.[Free Full Text]

15. Fetics B, Nevo E, Chen C-H, Kass DA. Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999; 46: 698–706.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement: dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology. 1981; 54: 227–236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Kleinman B, Powell S, Kumar P, Gardner R. The flush test measures the dynamic responses of the entire pressure monitoring system. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 1215–1220.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Karamanoglu M, Gallager DE, Avolio AP, O’Rourke MF. Pressure wave propagation in a multibranched model of the human upper limb. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269(pt 2): H1363–H1369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307–310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Wiggers C. The Pressure Pulse in the Cardiovascular System. New York, NY: Longmans; 1928: 47–90, 106–118.

21. Kroeker EJ, Wood EH. Beat-to-beat alterations in relationship of simultaneously recorded central and peripheral arterial pressure pulses during Valsalva maneuver and prolonged expiration in man. J Appl Physiol. 1956; 8: 483–494.[Free Full Text]

22. Kroeker EJ, Wood EH. Comparison of simultaneously recorded central and peripheral arterial pressure pulses during rest, exercise and tilted position in man. Circ Res. 1955; 3: 623–632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Remington JW, Wood EH. Formation of peripheral pulse contour in man. J Appl Physiol. 1956; 9: 433–442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rowell LB, Brengelmann GL, Blackman JR, Bruce RA, Murray JA. Disparities between aortic and peripheral pulse pressured induced by upright exercise and vasomotor changes in man. Circulation. 1968; 37: 954–964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. O’Rourke MF. Influence of ventricular ejection on the relationship between central aortic and brachial pressure pulse in man. Cardiovasc Res. 1970; 4: 291–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Kelly RP, Gibbs HH, O’Rourke MF, Daley JE, Mang K, Morgan JJ, Avolio AP. Nitroglycerin has more favourable effects on left ventricular afterload than apparent from measurement of pressure in a peripheral artery. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11: 138–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Liao D, Arnett DK, Tyroler HA, Riley WA, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Heiss G. Arterial stiffness and the development of hypertension: the ARIC study. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 201–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Simons PCG, Algra A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, van der Graaf Y, for the SMART Study Group. Common carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness: indicators of cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients: the SMART Study (Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease). Circulation. 1999; 100: 951–957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Mann DL. Mechanisms and models in heart failure: a combinatorial approach. Circulation. 1999; 100: 999–1008.[Free Full Text]

30. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, Ramipril, on death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 145–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. O’Rourke MF, Nichols WW. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular events in high risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 64–65.[Free Full Text]

32. O’Rourke MF. Pressure and flow waves in systemic arteries and the anatomical design of the arterial system. J Appl Physiol. 1967; 23: 139–149.[Free Full Text]

33. Avolio AP, Chen S, Wang R, Zhang C, Li M, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983; 68: 50–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Boutouyrie P, Laurent S, Benetos A, Girerd XJ, Hoeks AP, Safar ME. Opposing effects of ageing on distal and proximal large arteries in hypertensives. J Hypertens. 1992; 10 (suppl 6): S87–S91.

35. Gallagher D. Analysis of Pressure Wave Propagation in the Human Upper Limb: Physical Determinants and Clinical Applications [MD thesis]. New South Wales, Australia: University of New South Wales; 1993.

36. Lasance HAJ, Wesseling KH, Ascoop CA. Peripheral pulse contour analysis in determining stroke volume. In: Progress Report 5. Utrecht, Netherlands; Institute of Medical Physics; 1976: 59–62.

37. O’Rourke MF, Pauca A, Kon N, Tong W, Yung W, Qasem A, Avolio A. Calibrated ascending aortic pressure waves can be derived from the radial pulse using a generalized transfer function. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12(pt 2): 166A.Abstract.

38. Soderstrom S, Nyberg J, Ponten J, Sellgren J, O’Rourke MF. Substantial equivalence between ascending aortic pressure waveforms and waveforms derived from the radial pulse using a generalised transfer function? FASEB J. 1998; 12: A712.

39. Takazawa K, O’Rourke MF, Fujita M, Tanaka N, Takeda K, Kurosu F, Ibukiyama C. Estimation of ascending aortic pressure from radial arterial pressure using a generalised transfer function. Z Kardiol. 1996; 85 (suppl 3): 137–139.

40. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, Jamieson MJ, Prisant LM, Roccella E, Sheps SG. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 504–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Harms MPM, Wesseling KH, Pott F, Jenstrup M, Van Goudoever J, Secher NH, Van Lieshout JJ. Continuous stroke volume monitoring by modelling flow from non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure in humans under orthostatic stress. Clin Sci. 1999; 97: 291–301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Namasivayam, B. J. McDonnell, C. M. McEniery, M. F. O'Rourke, and on behalf of the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial Does Wave Reflection Dominate Age-Related Change in Aortic Blood Pressure Across the Human Life Span? Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yaron, Y. Greenman, J. B Rosenfeld, E. Izkhakov, R. Limor, E. Osher, G. Shenkerman, K. Tordjman, and N. Stern Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on arterial stiffness in older hypogonadal men Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 160(5): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vlachopoulos, P. Xaplanteris, N. Alexopoulos, K. Aznaouridis, C. Vasiliadou, K. Baou, E. Stefanadi, and C. Stefanadis Divergent Effects of Laughter and Mental Stress on Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics Psychosom Med, May 1, 2009; 71(4): 446 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. O'Donnell, S. A. Badger, M. A. Sharif, R. R. Makar, I. S. Young, B. Lee, and C.V. Soong The Vascular and Biochemical Effects of Cilostazol in Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 132 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. McEniery, B. J. McDonnell, A. So, S. Aitken, C. E. Bolton, M. Munnery, S. S. Hickson, Yasmin, K. M. Maki-Petaja, J. R. Cockcroft, et al. Aortic Calcification Is Associated With Aortic Stiffness and Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Healthy Individuals Hypertension, March 1, 2009; 53(3): 524 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kohler, J. C. T. Pepperell, B. Casadei, S. Craig, N. Crosthwaite, J. R. Stradling, and R. J. O. Davies CPAP and measures of cardiovascular risk in males with OSAS Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2008; 32(6): 1488 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Heffernan, S. Y. Jae, K. R. Wilund, J. A. Woods, and B. Fernhall Racial differences in central blood pressure and vascular function in young men Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): H2380 - H2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Chirinos, R. David, J. A. Bralley, H. Zea-Diaz, E. Munoz-Atahualpa, F. Corrales-Medina, C. Cuba-Bustinza, J. Chirinos-Pacheco, and J. Medina-Lezama Endogenous Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitors, Arterial Hemodynamics, and Subclinical Vascular Disease: The PREVENCION Study Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): 1051 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kohler, S. Craig, D. Nicoll, P. Leeson, R. J. O. Davies, and J. R. Stradling Endothelial Function and Arterial Stiffness in Minimally Symptomatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2008; 178(9): 984 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Smith and P. J. Levy Review: New techniques for assessment of vascular function Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. G. Edwards, M. S. Roy, and R. Y. Prasad Wave reflection augments central systolic and pulse pressures during facial cooling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2535 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. McEniery, Yasmin, B. McDonnell, M. Munnery, S. M. Wallace, C. V. Rowe, J. R. Cockcroft, I. B. Wilkinson, and on Behalf of the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial Central Pressure: Variability and Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Avolio Central Aortic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk: A Paradigm Shift? Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1470 - 1471. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Macedo, D. Luminoso, M. D. Savvidou, C. M. McEniery, and K. H. Nicolaides Maternal Wave Reflections and Arterial Stiffness in Normal Pregnancy as Assessed by Applanation Tonometry Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1047 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P Schneider, C. Delles, A. U Klingbeil, M. Ludwig, R. E Kolloch, M. Krekler, K. O Stumpe, and R. E Schmieder Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2008; 9(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Shimizu and K. Kario Review: Role of the augmentation index in hypertension Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. G. Edwards, C. R. Mastin, and R. W. Kenefick Wave reflection and central aortic pressure are increased in response to static and dynamic muscle contraction at comparable workloads J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. U. Zimmerli, E. Schiffer, P. Zurbig, D. M. Good, M. Kellmann, L. Mouls, A. R. Pitt, J. J. Coon, R. E. Schmieder, K. H. Peter, et al. Urinary Proteomic Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 290 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Osranek, J. H. Eisenach, B. K. Khandheria, K. Chandrasekaran, J. B. Seward, and M. Belohlavek Arterioventricular Coupling and Ventricular Efficiency After Antihypertensive Therapy: A Noninvasive Prospective Study Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 275 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Qasem and A. Avolio Determination of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity From Waveform Decomposition of the Central Aortic Pressure Pulse Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 188 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. DeLoach and R. R. Townsend Vascular Stiffness: Its Measurement and Significance for Epidemiologic and Outcome Studies Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Casey, D. T. Beck, and R. W. Braith Progressive Resistance Training Without Volume Increases Does Not Alter Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Wave Reflection Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2007; 232(9): 1228 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Crilly, C. Coch, M. Bruce, H. Clark, and D. Williams Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2007; 12(3): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Roman, R. B. Devereux, J. R. Kizer, E. T. Lee, J. M. Galloway, T. Ali, J. G. Umans, and B. V. Howard Central Pressure More Strongly Relates to Vascular Disease and Outcome Than Does Brachial Pressure: The Strong Heart Study Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Agabiti-Rosei, G. Mancia, M. F. O'Rourke, M. J. Roman, M. E. Safar, H. Smulyan, J.-G. Wang, I. B. Wilkinson, B. Williams, and C. Vlachopoulos Central Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy: A Consensus Document Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 154 - 160. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sabit, C. E. Bolton, P. H. Edwards, R. J. Pettit, W. D. Evans, C. M. McEniery, I. B. Wilkinson, J. R. Cockcroft, and D. J. Shale Arterial Stiffness and Osteoporosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1259 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schillaci, G. Parati, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, L. Sperandini, and E. Mannarino Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Specific Marker of Reduced Arterial Compliance Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Kullo and A. R. Malik Arterial Ultrasonography and Tonometry as Adjuncts to Cardiovascular Risk Stratification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1413 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Zineh, A. L. Beitelshees, and M. J. Haller NOS3 Polymorphisms Are Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 689 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schillaci, M. R. Mannarino, G. Pucci, M. Pirro, J. Helou, G. Savarese, G. Vaudo, and E. Mannarino Age-Specific Relationship of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity With Left Ventricular Geometry and Function in Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 317 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Laurent, J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel, P. Boutouyrie, C. Giannattasio, D. Hayoz, B. Pannier, C. Vlachopoulos, I. Wilkinson, H. Struijker-Boudier, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2006; 27(21): 2588 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Weber, J Auer, M F O'Rourke, C Punzengruber, E Kvas, and B Eber Prolonged mechanical systole and increased arterial wave reflections in diastolic dysfunction Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1616 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Stok, B. E. Westerhof, and J. M. Karemaker Changes in finger-aorta pressure transfer function during and after exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1207 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. McEniery, S. Wallace, I. S. Mackenzie, B. McDonnell, Yasmin, D. E. Newby, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson Endothelial Function Is Associated With Pulse Pressure, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Augmentation Index in Healthy Humans Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, M. R. Mannarino, G. Pucci, G. Savarese, S. S. Franklin, and E. Mannarino Relation Between Renal Function Within the Normal Range and Central and Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Nichols, J. C. Estrada, R. W. Braith, K. Owens, and C. R. Conti Enhanced External Counterpulsation Treatment Improves Arterial Wall Properties and Wave Reflection Characteristics in Patients With Refractory Angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 19, 2006; 48(6): 1208 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Maki-Petaja, F. C. Hall, A. D. Booth, S. M.L. Wallace, Yasmin, P. W.P. Bearcroft, S. Harish, A. Furlong, C. M. McEniery, J. Brown, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated With Increased Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity, Which Is Reduced by Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Therapy Circulation, September 12, 2006; 114(11): 1185 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Yasmin, C. M. McEniery, K. M. O'Shaughnessy, P. Harnett, A. Arshad, S. Wallace, K. Maki-Petaja, B. McDonnell, M. J. Ashby, J. Brown, et al. Variation in the Human Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Is Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Healthy Individuals Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(8): 1799 - 1805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. O'Rourke and J. B. Seward Central Arterial Pressure and Arterial Pressure Pulse: New Views Entering the Second Century After Korotkov Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2006; 81(8): 1057 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Kielstein, F. Donnerstag, S. Gasper, J. Menne, A. Kielstein, J. Martens-Lobenhoffer, F. Scalera, J. P. Cooke, D. Fliser, and S. M. Bode-Boger ADMA Increases Arterial Stiffness and Decreases Cerebral Blood Flow in Humans Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2024 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vlachopoulos, N. Alexopoulos, I. Dima, K. Aznaouridis, I. Andreadou, and C. Stefanadis Acute Effect of Black and Green Tea on Aortic Stiffness and Wave Reflections J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 25(3): 216 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Sharman, R. Lim, A. M. Qasem, J. S. Coombes, M. I. Burgess, J. Franco, P. Garrahy, I. B. Wilkinson, and T. H. Marwick Validation of a Generalized Transfer Function to Noninvasively Derive Central Blood Pressure During Exercise Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1203 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Edwards, A. L. Gauthier, M. A. Hayman, J. T. Lang, and R. W. Kenefick Acute effects of cold exposure on central aortic wave reflection J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2006; 100(4): 1210 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The CAFE Investigators, for the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee, B. Williams, P. S. Lacy, S. M. Thom, K. Cruickshank, A. Stanton, D. Collier, A. D. Hughes, et al. Differential Impact of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes: Principal Results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study Circulation, March 7, 2006; 113(9): 1213 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vlachopoulos, F. Kosmopoulou, N. Alexopoulos, N. Ioakeimidis, G. Siasos, and C. Stefanadis Acute mental stress has a prolonged unfavorable effect on arterial stiffness and wave reflections. Psychosom Med, March 1, 2006; 68(2): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Li, J.-G. Wang, E. Dolan, P.-J. Gao, H.-F. Guo, T. Nawrot, A. V. Stanton, D.-L. Zhu, E. O'Brien, and J. A. Staessen Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Derived From 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 359 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Weber, J. Auer, M. F. O'Rourke, E. Kvas, E. Lassnig, G. Lamm, N. Stark, M. Rammer, and B. Eber Increased arterial wave reflections predict severe cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2657 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. McEniery, Yasmin, I. R. Hall, A. Qasem, I. B. Wilkinson, J. R. Cockcroft, and on behalf of the ACCT Investigators Normal Vascular Aging: Differential Effects on Wave Reflection and Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2005; 46(9): 1753 - 1760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schillaci, G. V.L. De Socio, M. Pirro, G. Savarese, M. R. Mannarino, F. Baldelli, G. Stagni, and E. Mannarino Impact of Treatment With Protease Inhibitors on Aortic Stiffness in Adult Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2381 - 2385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A L Pauca, N D Kon, and M F O'Rourke Benefit of glyceryl trinitrate on arterial stiffness is directly due to effects on peripheral arteries Heart, November 1, 2005; 91(11): 1428 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vlachopoulos, I. Dima, K. Aznaouridis, C. Vasiliadou, N. Ioakeimidis, C. Aggeli, M. Toutouza, and C. Stefanadis Acute Systemic Inflammation Increases Arterial Stiffness and Decreases Wave Reflections in Healthy Individuals Circulation, October 4, 2005; 112(14): 2193 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. W. J Bogert and J. J van Lieshout Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger Exp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 90(4): 437 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Verbeke, P. Segers, S. Heireman, R. Vanholder, P. Verdonck, and L. M. Van Bortel Noninvasive Assessment of Local Pulse Pressure: Importance of Brachial-to-Radial Pressure Amplification Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 244 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. O'Rourke and M. E. Safar Relationship Between Aortic Stiffening and Microvascular Disease in Brain and Kidney: Cause and Logic of Therapy Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 200 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. McEniery, Yasmin, S. Wallace, K. Maki-Petaja, B. McDonnell, J. E. Sharman, C. Retallick, S. S. Franklin, M. J. Brown, R. C. Lloyd, et al. Increased Stroke Volume and Aortic Stiffness Contribute to Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Young Adults Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Rubin, M. S. Maurer, D. J. McMahon, J. P. Bilezikian, and S. J. Silverberg Arterial Stiffness in Mild Primary Hyperparathyroidism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3326 - 3330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Reneman, J. M. Meinders, and A. P.G. Hoeks Non-invasive ultrasound in arterial wall dynamics in humans: what have we learned and what remains to be solved Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 960 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Yasmin, S. Wallace, C. M. McEniery, Z. Dakham, P. Pusalkar, K. Maki-Petaja, M. J. Ashby, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), MMP-2, and Serum Elastase Activity Are Associated With Systolic Hypertension and Arterial Stiffness Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(2): 372 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Haller, M. Samyn, W. W. Nichols, T. Brusko, C. Wasserfall, R. F. Schwartz, M. Atkinson, J. J. Shuster, G. L. Pierce, and J. H. Silverstein Radial Artery Tonometry Demonstrates Arterial Stiffness in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2004; 27(12): 2911 - 2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Avolio, J. R. Cockcroft, and M. F. O'Rourke Use of Arterial Transfer Functions for the Derivation of Central Aortic Waveform Characteristics in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Response to Hope et al. Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2564 - 2565. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Mullan, C. N. Ennis, H. J. P. Fee, I. S. Young, and D. R. McCance Protective effects of ascorbic acid on arterial hemodynamics during acute hyperglycemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1262 - H1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Pauca, N. D. Kon, and M. F. O'Rourke The second peak of the radial artery pressure wave represents aortic systolic pressure in hypertensive and elderly patients Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Yasmin, C. M. McEniery, S. Wallace, I. S. Mackenzie, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson C-Reactive Protein Is Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Apparently Healthy Individuals Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 969 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Covic, D. J. A. Goldsmith, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, and M. Covic Haemodialysis acutely improves endothelium-independent vasomotor function without significantly influencing the endothelium-mediated abnormal response to a {beta}2-agonist Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 637 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Schram, R. M.A Henry, R. A.J.M van Dijk, P. J. Kostense, J. M. Dekker, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, N. Westerhof, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Increased Central Artery Stiffness in Impaired Glucose Metabolism and Type 2 Diabetes: The Hoorn Study Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Weber, J. Auer, M. F. O'Rourke, E. Kvas, E. Lassnig, R. Berent, and B. Eber Arterial Stiffness, Wave Reflections, and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 184 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vlachopoulos, K. Hirata, and M. F O'Rourke Effect of sildenafil on arterial stiffness and wave reflection Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2003; 8(4): 243 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. F. O'Rourke, A. Avolio, A. Qasem, S. C. Millasseau, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Clinical Assessment of Wave Reflection * Response: Augmentation Index and the Radial-to-Aortic Transfer Function Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42 (5): e15 - e16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Smulyan, D. S. Siddiqui, R. J. Carlson, G. M. London, and M. E. Safar Clinical Utility of Aortic Pulses and Pressures Calculated From Applanated Radial-Artery Pulses Hypertension, August 1, 2003; 42(2): 150 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Greenfield, K. Samaras, L. V. Campbell, A. B. Jenkins, P. J. Kelly, T. D. Spector, and C. S. Hayward Physical activity reduces genetic susceptibility to increased central systolic pressure augmentation: a study of female twins J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 264 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-S. Tsai, C. B. Yucha, W. W. Nichols, and H. Yarandi Hemodynamics and Arterial Properties in Response to Mental Stress in Individuals with Mild Hypertension Psychosom Med, July 1, 2003; 65(4): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Smith, H. Lane, N. Davies, L. M. Evans, J. Cockcroft, M. F. Scanlon, and J. S. Davies The Effects of Depot Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog on Central Aortic Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2556 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Klocke, J R Cockcroft, G J Taylor, I R Hall, and D R Blake Arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, as determined by pulse wave analysis, in rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2003; 62(5): 414 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Millasseau, S. J. Patel, S. R. Redwood, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Pressure Wave Reflection Assessed From the Peripheral Pulse: Is a Transfer Function Necessary? Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1016 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tamminen, J. Westerbacka, S. Vehkavaara, and H. Yki-Jarvinen Insulin-Induced Decreases in Aortic Wave Reflection and Central Systolic Pressure Are Impaired in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2002; 25(12): 2314 - 2319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Obuobie, J. Smith, L. M. Evans, R. John, J. S. Davies, and J. H. Lazarus Increased Central Arterial Stiffness in Hypothyroidism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4662 - 4666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. North, J. W. MacCluer, R. B. Devereux, B. V. Howard, T. K. Welty, L. G. Best, E. T. Lee, R. R. Fabsitz, and M. J. Roman Heritability of Carotid Artery Structure and Function: The Strong Heart Family Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 22(10): 1698 - 1703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Cockcroft and I. B. Wilkinson reliability of transfer function in determining central pulse pressure and augmentation index: Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1196 - 1197. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Hope, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Reliability of transfer functions in determining central pulse pressure and augmentation index J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1196 - 1196. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Comparison of generalized and gender-specific transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveforms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1150 - H1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X J Jiang, M F O'Rourke, W Q L Jin, L S Liu, C W Li, P C Tai, X C Zhang, and S Z Liu Quantification of glyceryl trinitrate effect through analysis of the synthesised ascending aortic pressure waveform Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 143 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. B. Wilkinson, K. Prasad, I. R. Hall, A. Thomas, H. MacCallum, D. J. Webb, M. P. Frenneaux, and J. R. Cockcroft Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2002; 39(6): 1005 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Safar, J. Blacher, B. Pannier, A. P. Guerin, S. J. Marchais, P.-M. Guyonvarc'h, and G. M. London Central Pulse Pressure and Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 735 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pauca, A. L. Articles by Kon, N. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pauca, A. L. Articles by Kon, N. D.