Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;39:184-188
doi: 10.1161/hy0102.100784
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pagani, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pagani, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Hypertension. 2002;39:184.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Hemodynamic and Autonomic Adjustments to Real Life Stress Conditions in Humans

Daniela Lucini; Guido Norbiato; Mario Clerici; Massimo Pagani

From Centro di Ricerca sulla Terapia Neurovegetativa, Medicina Interna I, Ospedale L. Sacco, Centro Ricerche Cardiovascolari, CNR, Istituto Scienze Biomediche, University of Milano (D.L., M.P.), Milano; Department of Psychology, University of Urbino (D.L.), Urbino; Department of Endocrinology, Ospedale L. Sacco (G.N.), Milano; and Chair of Immunology, DiSP LITA Vialba, University of Milano (M.C.), Milano, Italy

Correspondence to Massimo Pagani, MD, FACC, Medicina I, Ospedale L. Sacco, Università di Milano, ViaG.B. Grassi, 74, 20157 Milano, Italy. E-mail massimop{at}fisiopat.sacco.unimi.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Psychological stress represents a risk factor for hypertension, but mechanisms are not known in detail. In this investigation we tested the hypothesis that real-life stress conditions produce changes in autonomic cardiac and vascular regulation that might differ in magnitude. University students, a well-established model of mild real-life stress, were examined shortly before a university examination, and a second time 3 months afterward, during holiday. Autonomic cardiovascular regulation was assessed by a noninvasive approach, based on autoregressive analysis of RR interval variability (V) and of systolic arterial pressure (SAP) V. The overall level of stress in the two sessions was gauged from the elevated salivary cortisol (5.6±0.5 versus 2.4±0.2 ng/mL, P<0.05) and altered cytokine profile (P<0.05). During the stress day, the RR interval was reduced and arterial pressure increased significantly; simultaneously, the normalized low frequency component of RRV (a marker of sympathetic modulation of the sinoatrial node) was increased and the index {alpha} (a measure of baroreflex gain) reduced. Concomitantly, the autonomic response to the sympathetic excitation produced by standing was altered: cardiac response was impaired and vascular responsiveness increased. Markers of autonomic regulation of the sinoatrial node correlated significantly with cortisol levels, both at rest and also considering standing induced changes, suggesting a gradual range of effects. The data support the concept that mild real-life stress increases arterial pressure and impairs cardiovascular homeostasis. These changes, assessable with spectral analysis of cardiovascular variability, might contribute, in susceptible individuals, to the link between psychological stress and increased cardiovascular risk of hypertension.


Key Words: autonomic nervous system • baroreceptors • stress hormones • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
The importance and nature of the complex, multifarious mechanisms linking psychological stress to arterial hypertension1,2 have been extensively explored in simulated conditions. In laboratory models, mental stress leads to a rise in arterial pressure and heart rate, by way of altered neural cardiovascular regulation, typically consisting of increased sympathetic activity35 and reduced baroreflex gain,6,7 coupled to a prolonged endothelial dysfunction.8,9 Sympathetic activation is noninvasively recognized by spectral analysis of RR variability,10,11 indicating a predominant low frequency (LF) component of RR variability, in conditions of acute laboratory stress.7 Data from laboratory experiments, however, are limited by their intrinsic artificiality and by the fact that some of the more efficacious models, such as public speaking and mental arithmetic, might involve changes in respiration that could obscure the interpretation of results, particularly when autonomic regulation is inferred solely by spectral analysis of RR variability.12 Conversely, the effects of real-life psychological stressors on cardiovascular regulations, although more elusive,13 might be more clinically relevant and occur in the absence of the bias produced by immediate changes in respiratory pattern. In this context the possibility offered by heart rate variability (HRV) analysis to study autonomic dysregulation also in essential hypertension5,14 might offer new clues to the link between psychosocial factors and cardiovascular conditions.1318

The principal aim of the present investigation was, accordingly, to test the hypothesis that a common real-life stressor of moderate intensity, as represented by the preparation for a major university examination, might alter basal hemodynamic indices of resting autonomic cardiac and vascular regulations, as assessed by computer analysis of RR and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) variability,10,11 in the absence of the bias of changes in respiratory pattern induced by talking. We also assessed possible changes in autonomic cardiac and vascular responsiveness19 to the sympathetic excitation produced by active orthostatism.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
We enrolled 30 healthy, nonsmokers, medical students (age 22±1 years) of either gender. They were studied twice: the first time (stress day) 30 to 60 minutes before an university examination and a second time (control day) 3 months afterward, in a period away from study routines. In both instances, we assessed endocrine, immunological, psychological, and autonomic involvement. The protocol of the study was approved by our Institutional Review Board.

Assessment of Overall Stress Level
We used a battery of noninvasive tests. Endocrine involvement was assessed in all 30 subjects by measuring by radioimmunoassay the free salivary cortisol level that reflects the concentration of free hormone in plasma.20 Saliva samples (2 mL), from both the stress day and the control day, were obtained at approximately the same hour (10:30 AM ±1).21 Immunological involvement was estimated in a random subgroup of 14 subjects whose salivary sample was technically adequate by also assessing the salivary levels of selected cytokines (interleukin [IL]1, IL2, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]{alpha}) with commercially available ELISA assays. Prolonged exposure to stressors is signaled by alterations in cytokine profile, such as increasing IL1 and TNF{alpha}, and decreasing IL2.22

Psychological involvement was gauged by a battery of questionnaires providing self-rated scales that, in line with previous23 and more recent studies,24 focuses on appraisal, coping, and health. In brief, we assessed the following factors:25

Study of Autonomic Regulation
In both days, all subjects were studied in resting conditions (10 minutes) and also during active orthostatism (7 minutes).10

Recorded Variables
Using standard Ag-AgCl electrodes and a piezoelectric respiratory belt, both the ECG (CM5) and the respiratory signal were monitored with a 2-way radiotelemetry system. The arterial pressure waveform was continuously estimated noninvasively with a plethysmographic device (Finapres, Ohmeda). Data were recorded on a computer for subsequent analysis.

Data Analysis
From the ECG-derived tachogram, an autoregressive approach provides, in both absolute (ie, ms2) and normalized units (ie, nu), spectral powers of low (LF) and high frequency (HF) components as previously described.10,11 Spectral analysis was also performed on the systolic arterial pressure and the respiratory signals using a similar procedure. This latter assessed the main respiratory frequency, which was always higher than 0.15 Hz. From the simultaneous analysis of arterial pressure and RR interval variabilities, a frequency domain index ({alpha}) can be derived, which is a measure of the overall gain of the arterial pressure-heart period relationship.26,27

Statistics
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical tests included 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures, followed by individual contrasts, and the paired t test, as appropriate (Sigmastat, Jandel). An {alpha} level <=0.05 was considered significant. Correlation analysis was used to estimate the statistical link between selected parameters treating data from the 2 experimental days as independent observations.

An expanded Methods section can be found in an online data supplement available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamics
The RR interval was significantly smaller, whereas SAP was significantly more elevated during the stress day compared with the control day, during both rest and active orthostatism. This maneuver, in addition, reduced the RR interval, but not SAP, compared with the baseline on both days. On the stress day, however, the standing induced reduction in the RR interval was smaller than observed from a higher baseline (Table 1) on the control day.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of RR Interval and SAP Variabilities in Healthy Subjects During Stress and Control Days, Both at Rest and Standing

Autonomic Control of the Circulation
Rest
The stress day was characterized by significantly higher values of low frequency RR (LFRR) (in nu) and of LF/HF, whereas, in contrast, high frequency RR (HFRR) was significantly smaller. Low frequency SAP (LFSAP) was slightly, but not significantly, greater during the stress day (Table 1 and Figure 1). The index {alpha}, marker of the overall gain of the arterial pressure-heart period baroreflex, appeared significantly reduced on the stress day.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Example of autoregressive spectral analysis of RR interval (top panels), SAP (middle panels), and respiratory (bottom panels) variabilities in a healthy subject just before a university examination (stress day, right panels) and, 3 months later, during a period away from study routines (control day, left panels). Stress day is characterized by a prevalence of the LF component or RR interval variability. Furthermore, the central respiratory frequency is synchronous with the high frequency component of the RR interval and SAP variability during both the stress and control days.

Active Orthostatism (Standing)
On the control day, this maneuver, as expected, induced clear increases in LF (nu) RR variability and in LF/HF, and decreases in HF (nu) RR variability. On the stress day, standing induced changes in markers of autonomic modulation of the SA node were, however, less apparent (Figure 2). LFSAP increased significantly during both the control and the stress day (Table 1). However, on the stress day, LFSAP increased approximately 6-fold from the same-day baseline value. This increase was significantly greater than at the control (Figure 2). The index {alpha} was reduced by standing both on the control day and the stress day and reached, in this latter instance, minimal values (Table 1).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Standing-induced changes ({Delta}) in the spectral indices of autonomic modulation of the SA node (LFRR) and the vasculature (LFSAP) during a control day (open bars) and a stress day (dark bars), in medical students at rest. The stress day is characterized by a significant reduction of the standing-induced rise of LFRR, whereas induced increases of LFSAP are enhanced. nu=normalized unit; *P<0.05.

Respiration
Respiratory rate and pattern, as assessed with spectral analysis of respiratory movement, were not significantly modified in the group, in either the standing or the stressful situation (Table 1).

Overall Stress Level
Salivary cortisol levels (sampled at 10:30 AM ±1) appeared elevated (P<0.001) during the stress day compared with the baseline, showing, respectively, values of 5.59±0.55 and 2.45±0.16 ng/mL. Notably, a significant correlation was found between salivary cortisol and markers of autonomic modulation of the sinoatrial (SA) node (Table 2, Column A), both at rest and considering changes induced by standing. Conversely, no correlation was found between salivary cortisol and markers of autonomic vascular modulation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Pearson Correlation Analysis Between Indices of Autonomic Cardiovascular Regulation and (A) Salivary Cortisol and (B) Subjective Stress Scores

During the stress day, IL1 and TNF{alpha} were significantly greater (P<0.001) compared with baseline (respectively, IL1 2.94±0.37 during the stress day and 2.08±0.35 at control; TNF{alpha} 10.82±1.17 and 5.12±0.52 pg/mL), whereas IL2 was significantly (P<0.001) smaller (respectively, 2.09±0.72 and 6.50±1.14 pg/m), suggesting a marked change in cytokine profile. Significant differences in stress and symptoms scores were found between the stress day and the control day (16.0±0.7 versus 6.9±0.6 arbitrary units for stress scores and 29.6±1.6 versus 15.4±2.2 arbitrary units for symptoms scores, both P<0.001). Subjective stress scores (Table 2, Column B) were significantly correlated with the resting values of RR, and SAP, and with indices of vascular autonomic modulation, particularly considering standing-induced changes. Similar results were obtained with the symptoms scores (data not shown). Conversely, the scores related to the dimension of control were similar (P=0.64) on the stress and control days. Notably, the performance of all subjects at the subsequent examination was excellent (median score 29, range 24–30 on a scale of 0–30).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
The main finding of this study on healthy young subjects is that a mild real life stressor, such as that produced by the preparation for a routine university examination, is capable of significantly altering the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the cytokine profile, raises arterial pressure and produces complex changes in major cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms, without significantly affecting the respiratory pattern.

Real Life Stress
The subjects of the present study were exposed for several months to a routine of long study and work hours in preparation for the anticipated challenge of the examination. The presence, on the stress day, of elevated psychological involvement was confirmed by increased stress and symptoms scores in all subjects. Conversely, scores relating to feelings of control were similar on both the rest and the stress days. This finding appears justifiable by the excellent grades that all students received on the subsequent examination. Therefore, the feelings of uncontrollability25 and hopelessness that might acutely disrupt individual responses to stressors were unlikely to represent a significant bias in the present study. The increase in salivary cortisol clearly pointed to a major engagement of the HPA axis with possible excitatory influence on sympathetic regulation.28 However, the limited number of repetitions does not provide conclusive evidence that such increase had been acting homogeneously for a long time, as opposed to displaying only a short lasting increase near examination day.29 However, the shift in cytokine profile (increase in IL1 and TNF{alpha}, reduction in IL2), as with long-term challenges, suggests a prolonged activity of the stressor on humoral homeostasis.22,30 Our data, however, did not address any of the possible molecular mechanisms that might be involved in this rearrangement, although it is well recognized that elevated glucocorticoid levels might interfere, eg, with transcription proteins, such as nuclear transcription factor {kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B).31

Hemodynamic and Autonomic Effects
A marked elevation in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure and in heart rate was observed in all subjects on the stress day, corresponding to a rise in the double product of about 36%, which implies a greater oxygen demand at rest. Regarding RR variability, no changes were observed in resting RR variance, a simple time domain measure of HRV, which may, therefore, be ineffective in assessing the influence of this type of mild stressor on autonomic cardiac regulations.

However, a clear shift in the resting spectral profile was observed, being characterized by higher LFRR (in nu) and LF/HF, accompanied by a diminished HFRR (in nu). This finding appears to confirm that time and frequency domain measures of HRV have a different capacity to signal changes in underlying neural modulation32,33 and that spectral measures and normalized units might be more informative34 also in the case of the autonomic changes produced by mild real-life stressors. Although the indirect nature of spectral derived parameters calls for caution in inferring autonomic regulation,33,34 the simultaneous tachycardia and enhanced arterial pressure, together with a reduced baroreflex gain, as evidenced by the smaller index {alpha},26 point to a major rearrangement of resting autonomic balance toward sympathetic predominance and vagal withdrawal on the stress day, suggesting a reset of major cardiac regulatory mechanisms to a different resting level. Data from the present study, in addition, seem to confirm that mental stress induces a marked increase in the LF component of RR variability, well evidenced by autoregressive spectral analysis,7 independently of significant respiratory changes. Moreover, the findings obtained in response to the short-term physical stress imposed by active orthostatism merit some comment, particularly in view of the different magnitude of changes observed in markers of vascular, as opposed to cardiac, autonomic responsiveness. In fact, on the stress day, active standing induced lesser tachycardia and smaller increases in LFRR, whereas it induced a 6-fold rise in the power of LFSAP, suggesting greater vascular, as opposed to cardiac, responses to standing-induced sympathetic excitation. We can hypothesize that such an increased sympathetic vasomotor responsiveness is a consequence of the permissive action of an enhanced cortisol level on adrenergic responses.29 In this context, a stress-induced impairment of endothelial function might play an additional role.9,35 The extent to which prolonged psychological stress and increased vascular sympathetic responsiveness might have a role in clinical cardiology, possibly underpinning the link between life events and acute triggers,36,37 remains to be elucidated. Although at the moment we cannot provide definitive information on the central, peripheral, or humoral mechanisms of the observed changes in cardiovascular regulation, the finding of significant correlation between cortisol levels and indices of autonomic modulation of the SA node, suggests that common mechanisms underlay gradual and individualized neural and humoral responses to stressors. At the periphery, autonomic adrenal innervation could be implicated,38 whereas additional changes in central autonomic oscillation might also play a role.39

Study Limitations
We did not measure directly sympathetic nerve activity, which requires invasive techniques,40 but only inferred rest autonomic balance and responses to an excitatory stimulus indirectly with spectral analysis of RR interval and SAP variability.10,11 We also examined baroreflex gain and sympathetic vasomotor modulation, thus addressing simultaneously multiple autonomic functional mechanisms to better capture the information34 about cardiovascular regulation, which is likely to be spread across different variables.41 Salivary cortisol and cytokine levels might not perfectly correspond to plasma values but were obtained without needles, thus avoiding the attendant possible emotional bias.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
In this longitudinal study, we have observed that, in healthy medical students, the preparation to undergo the expected challenge of a university examination, which represents a widely employed model of a moderate real-life stressor, raises resting arterial pressure and, in addition, induces important humoral changes and impairs autonomic regulation. Overall, the clear activation of the HPA axis and altered cytokine profile is accompanied by a shift toward sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal at rest and by enhanced vasomotor and reduced cardiac sympathetic responses to standing. These alterations of humoral and autonomic homeostasis suggest a treatable mechanistic link2,13,37 between real-life stress and components of increased cardiovascular risk, such as increased arterial pressure14 and reduced baroreflex gain.42


*    Acknowledgments
 
Partial financial support by Ministero dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST) 40%, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI), and Interdisciplinary Research for Clinical and Experimental Advancement (IRCEA) and the typing assistance of Giovanna Macciò are gratefully acknowledged.

Received July 9, 2001; first decision August 6, 2001; accepted October 4, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusions
*References
 
1. Zimmerman RS, Frohlich ED. Stress and hypertension. J Hypertens. 1990; 8 (suppl): S103–S107.

2. Julius S. Sympathetic hyperactivity and coronary risk in hypertension. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 886–893.[Free Full Text]

3. Dimsdale JE, Ross J. Plasma catecholamines in stress and exercise. JAMA. 1980; 243: 340–342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kamiya A, Iwase S, Michikami D, Fu Q, Mano T. Heaad-down bed rest alters sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to mental stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000; 279: R440–R447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Furlan R, Guzzetti S, Cerutti S. Spectral analysis to assess increased sympathetic tone in arterial hypertension. Hypertension. 1991; 17 (suppl): III-36–III-42.

6. Sleight P, Fox P, Lopez R, Brooks DE. The effect of mental arithmetic on blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity in man. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978; 55: 381s–382s.

7. Pagani M, Lucini D, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Piazza S, Biancardi L. Effects of physical and mental exercise on heart rate variability.In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. New York, NY: Futura Publishing Company Inc; 1995: 245–266.

8. Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Krantz DS, Vita JA, Ryan TJ, Ganz P, Selwyn AP. The effect of atherosclerosis on the vasomotor response of coronary arteries to mental stress. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 1551–1556.[Abstract]

9. Ghiandoni L, Donald DE, Cropley M, Mullen JM, Oakley G, Taylor M, O’Connor G, Betterridge J, Klein N, Steptoe A, Deanfield JE. Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2473–2478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, Sandrone G, Malfatto G, Dell’Orto S, Piccaluga E, Turiel M, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Malliani A. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympathovagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res. 1986; 58: 178–193.

11. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991; 84: 482–492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bernardi L, Wdowczyck-Szulc J, Valenti C, Castoldi S, Passino C, Spadacini G, Sleight P. Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1462–1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2192–2217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Vrijkotte TG, M, van Doornen LJP, Geus EJC. Effects of work stress on ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 880–886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Wilson D, K, Kliewer W, Plybon L, Sica DA. Socioeconomic status and blood pressure reactivity in healthy black adolescents. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 496–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Pickering TG. The effects of environmental and lifestyle factors on blood pressure and the intermediary role of the sympathetic nervous system. J Hum Hypertens. 1997; 11: S9–S18.

17. Schroeder KE, Narkiewicz K, Kato M, Pesek CA, Phillips DD, Somers VK. Personality type and neural circulatory control. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 830–833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Singh JP, Larson MG, Tsuji H, Evans JC, O’Donnell CJ, Levy D. Reduced heart rate variability and new-onset hypertension: insights into pathogenesis of hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 293–297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Mansi JA, Drummer C. Chronic stress induces sensitization in sympathodrenal responses to stress in borderline hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: R813–R820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH. Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1994; 19: 313–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Hiramatsu R. Direct assay of cortisol in human saliva by solid phase radioimmunoaasay and its clnical applications. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1981; 117: 239–249.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Iwakabe K, Shimada M, Ohta A, Yahata T, Ohmi Y, Habu S, Nishimura T. The restraint stress drives a shift in TH1/Th2 balance toward Th2 dominant immunity in mice. Immunol Lett. 1998; 62: 39–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Derogatis LR, Coons HL. Self report measures of stress.In: Goldberg L, Breznitz S, eds. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1993: 200–233.

24. Koh KB, Park JK, Kim CH, Cho S. Development of the stress response inventory and its application in clinical practice. Psychosom Med. 2001; 63: 668–678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Cacioppo JT, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Uchino BN, Sgoutas-Emch SA, Sheridan JF, Bernstson GG, Glaser R. Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation. Psychosom Med. 1995; 57: 154–164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Pagani M, Somers VK, Furlan R, Dell’Orto S, Conway J, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Sleight P, Malliani A. Changes in autonomic regulation induced by physical training in mild hypertension. Hypertension. 1988; 12: 600–610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Lucini D, Pagani M, Mela GS, Malliani A. Sympathetic restraint of baroreflex control of heart period in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Clin Sci. 1994; 86: 547–556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Koepke JP, Jones S, DiBona GF. Renal nerve activity and renal function during environmental stress in DOCA-NaC1 rats. Am J Physiol. 1986; 251: R289–R294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000; 21: 55–89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Pike JL, Smith TL, Hauger RL, Nicassio PM, Patterson TL, McClintick J, Costlow C, Irwin MR. Chronic life stress alters sympathetic, neuroendocrine, and immune responsivity to an acute psychological stessor in humans. Psychosom Med. 1997; 59: 447–457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Barnes PJ, Karin M. Nuclear factor-kB: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 1066–1071.[Free Full Text]

32. Montano N, Gnecchi Ruscone T, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation. 1994; 90: 1826–1831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Malliani A, Pagani M, Montano N, Mela GS. Sympathovagal balance: a reappraisal. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2640–2643.[Free Full Text]

34. Pagani M, Malliani A. Interpreting spontaneous oscillations of muscle sympathetic nerve activity and of heart rate variability. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 1709–1719.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Sherwood A, Johnson K, Blumenthal JA, Hinderliter AL. Endothelial function and hemodynamic responses during mental stress. Psychosom Med. 1999; 61: 365–370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Mulry RP, Tofler GH, Jacobs SC, Friedman R, Benson H, Muller JE. Triggering of acute myocardial infarction onset by episodes of anger. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators Circulation. 1995; 92: 1720–1725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Heusch G, Baumgart D, Camici PG, Chilian WM, Gregorini L, Hess O, Indolfi C, Rimoldi O. Alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction and myocardial ischemia in humans. Circulation. 2000; 101: 689–694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Bornstein SR, Böttner A. The autonomic nervous system and adrenocortical function: what can be learned from transgenic models and knockout mice?In: Bolis CL, Licinio J, eds. The Autonomic Nervous System. Geneva: World Health Orgnanization; 1999; 123–134.

39. Massimimi M, Porta A, Malliani A, Malliani A, Montano N. Heart rate variability is encoded in the spontaneous discharge of thalamic somatosensory neurons in cat. J Physiol. 2000; 526: 387–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Pagani M, Montano N, Porta A, Malliani A, Abboud FM, Birkett CL, Somers VK. Relationship between spectral components of cardiovascular variabilities and direct measures of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1441–1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Malliani A, Pagani M, Furlan R, Guzzetti S, Lucini D, Montano N, Cerutti S, Mela GS. Individual recognition by heart rate variability of two different autonomic profiles related to posture. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4143–4145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction: ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction). Lancet. 1998; 351: 478–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
K. E. Innes and H. K. Vincent
The Influence of Yoga-Based Programs on Risk Profiles in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., December 1, 2007; 4(4): 469 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
V. K. Yeragani, R. Kumar, K. J. Bar, P. Chokka, and M. Tancer
Exaggerated Differences in Pulse Wave Velocity Between Left and Right Sides Among Patients With Anxiety Disorders and Cardiovascular Disease
Psychosom Med, October 1, 2007; 69(8): 717 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Lucini, S. Riva, P. Pizzinelli, and M. Pagani
Stress Management at the Worksite: Reversal of Symptoms Profile and Cardiovascular Dysregulation
Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y.-K. Kim, G.-S. Hwang, I.-Y. Huh, J.-H. Hwang, J.-Y. Park, S.-L. Chung, T.-W. Kwon, and S.-M. Han
Altered autonomic cardiovascular regulation after combined deep and superficial cervical plexus blockade for carotid endarterectomy.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 533 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. Iellamo, M. Di Rienzo, D. Lucini, J. M. Legramante, P. Pizzinelli, P. Castiglioni, F. Pigozzi, M. Pagani, and G. Parati
Muscle metaboreflex contribution to cardiovascular regulation during dynamic exercise in microgravity: insights from mission STS-107 of the space shuttle Columbia
J. Physiol., May 1, 2006; 572(3): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. Julien
The enigma of Mayer waves: Facts and models
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2006; 70(1): 12 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
K. E. Innes, C. Bourguignon, and A. G. Taylor
Risk Indices Associated with the Insulin Resistance Syndrome, Cardiovascular Disease, and Possible Protection with Yoga: A Systematic Review
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 491 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Lucini, G. Di Fede, G. Parati, and M. Pagani
Impact of Chronic Psychosocial Stress on Autonomic Cardiovascular Regulation in Otherwise Healthy Subjects
Hypertension, November 1, 2005; 46(5): 1201 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J.M. Broadley, A. Korszun, E. Abdelaal, V. Moskvina, C. J.H. Jones, G. B. Nash, C. Ray, J. Deanfield, and M. P. Frenneaux
Inhibition of Cortisol Production With Metyrapone Prevents Mental Stress-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction and Baroreflex Impairment
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 344 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S Vale
Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular diseases
Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2005; 81(957): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. F. Joaquim, V. M. Farah, I. Bernatova, R. Fazan Jr., R. Grubbs, and M. Morris
Enhanced heart rate variability and baroreflex index after stress and cholinesterase inhibition in mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H251 - H257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. F. Harris and K. A. Matthews
Interactions Between Autonomic Nervous System Activity and Endothelial Function: A Model for the Development of Cardiovascular Disease
Psychosom Med, March 1, 2004; 66(2): 153 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Barres, Y. Cheng, and C. Julien
Steady-State and Dynamic Responses of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity to Air-Jet Stress in Sinoaortic Denervated Rats
Hypertension, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 629 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. F. Harris, K. A. Matthews, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, and L. H. Kuller
Associations Between Psychological Traits and Endothelial Function in Postmenopausal Women
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2003; 65(3): 402 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Lucini, G. S. Mela, A. Malliani, and M. Pagani
Impairment in Cardiac Autonomic Regulation Preceding Arterial Hypertension in Humans: Insights From Spectral Analysis of Beat-by-Beat Cardiovascular Variability
Circulation, November 19, 2002; 106(21): 2673 - 2679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Iellamo, J. M. Legramante, F. Pigozzi, A. Spataro, G. Norbiato, D. Lucini, and M. Pagani
Conversion From Vagal to Sympathetic Predominance With Strenuous Training in High-Performance World Class Athletes
Circulation, June 11, 2002; 105(23): 2719 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pagani, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pagani, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors