(Hypertension. 2002;39:405.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Science, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Correspondence to Maria Helena C. Carvalho, Institute of Biomedical Science, University of Sao Paulo, 05508-900, Av Prof Lineu Prestes, 1524, room 217, Sao Paulo, Brazil. E-mail mhcarval{at}icb.usp.br
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hormones estrogen rats, spontaneously hypertensive endothelium anions microcirculation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelial dysfunction, and a relative deficiency in nitric oxide (NO), have been associated with several cardiovascular diseases including hypertension.3 Recent data suggest that direct actions of estrogen on the endothelial cells may contribute to its protective effects.46 Therefore, an impairment in endothelial function after estrogen withdrawal may be considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. In fact, it has been reported that estrogen deficiency causes a decrease in endothelium-dependent relaxation in both postmenopausal4 and ovariectomized women.5 In a previous study, we demonstrated that ovariectomy aggravates the endothelial dysfunction in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).6
The mechanisms whereby estrogen exerts its effects on the endothelium are not completely understood. Several studies have suggested that a modulation in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and in NO generation may be responsible for the beneficial effects of estrogen on endothelial function.7 However, it is currently speculated that in essential hypertension, the endothelial dysfunction is evoked not by a decrease in NO generation, but by a decreased bioavailability of NO.8 The biological NO activity may be modified by reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion. An increase in superoxide concentration leads to scavenging of NO and to cellular damage associated with endothelial dysfunction.8 Interestingly, it has been demonstrated in hypertensive rats that the impairment in endothelial function after estrogen withdrawal is not related to a reduction in eNOS expression. The increased oxidative stress in these animals provides a potential explanation for the exacerbation of endothelial dysfunction.9 In addition, in a previous study performed in microvessels from female SHR, we demonstrated that the impairment in endothelial function after ovariectomy is partially due to an augmented superoxide generation.6
Recent in vitro studies have indicated that estrogen has an antioxidant activity. The effects of estrogen on ROS have been shown in many studies conducted in cell culture10 and in isolated blood vessels,9 but the biological significance of these in vitro or ex vivo studies remains to be elucidated. Although a few clinical studies have observed inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation after estrogen treatment,11 there are no studies addressing the antioxidant potential of estrogen in physiological conditions. In this study we have evaluated the effects of physiological concentrations of estrogen on oxidative stress in microvessels studied in vivo.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intravital Fluorescence Microscopy
Reactive oxygen species generation in mesenteric arteriolar wall was determined as described by Suzuky et al.12 Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 to 450 mg/kg, SC), and the mesentery was arranged for microscopic observation in situ as previously described.13 The preparation was kept at 37°C and was continuously superfused (1.0 mL/min) with a Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate-buffered solution, saturated with a 95% N2/5% CO2 gas mixture to minimize the production of oxygen free radicals. Special precautions were taken to avoid interruption of the suffusion solution on the tissue because even superficial drying causes rapid cell injury. Blood vessels were classified according to their branching order beginning at the capillary level and reaching up to the arteriolar side.13 Single unbranched A2 arterioles (15 to 25 µm) were selected for this study.
The mesenteric microcirculation was visualized through an intravital microscope (Axioscop, Zeiss) with a 20x water immersion objective lens (Zeiss) by using a digital color charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (ZVS-47EC, Zeiss). To elicit fluorescent images, the preparation was illuminated with a 200-W mercury lamp. The light was passed through a fluorescence microscope attachment with quartz collector, excitation filter (490 nm, Zeiss) for epi-illumination, and a band-pass filter (590 nm, Zeiss). During the intervening periods, the shutter for the excitation light was kept closed. The fluorescent images were recorded by a computer system (KS-300, Kontron) for posterior analysis. Transilluminated images were also recorded immediately before the fluorescence images.
After an initial 30-minute stabilization period, when the mesenteric preparation was superfused with a standard buffer, a background autofluorescence image in the selected tissue area was recorded. The preparation was then superfused with a buffer solution containing hydroethidine (HE; 10.0 µmol/L, Polysciences) for 60 minutes. The number of nuclei labeled with ethidium bromide (EB-positive nuclei) along arterioles (NEB) was determined every 15 minutes after the onset of HE superfusion. At the end of the experiments, the tissue was superfused with absolute ethanol for 5 minutes followed by EB superfusion to establish the total number of nuclei along the vessel wall (NT). The EB-positive number was counted (double-blind) and expressed as a percentage of EB-positive nuclei = (NEB/NT) x 100 (%).
Interventions
To investigate the role of ROS on hydroethidine oxidation in the mesenteric arteriolar wall, we treated the mesenteries with the superoxide dismutase mimetic, MnTMPyP (10 µmol/L, superoxide anion scavenger), mannitol (10 µmol/L, which decomposes hydroxyl radical), or L-NAME (10 µmol/L, a NOS inhibitor). To evaluate the source of superoxide generation, both OE and OVX SHR were treated with the following drugs: diclofenac (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, 1 mg/kg/15 days) or losartan (AT1 receptor antagonist, 15 mg/kg/15 days). Because losartan, at this dose, causes a decrease in BP that may contribute to a decrease in superoxide generation,14 female SHR were treated with verapamil (10 mg/kg/15 days), which does not interfere with pro-oxidative proteins but has an antihypertensive action. In another series of experiments, the mesenteries from OE and OVX were treated with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI 20 µmol/L, an NADPH-oxidase inhibitor) or with oxypurinol (1 mmol/L, a xanthine-oxidase inhibitor). In all treatments, each drug was superfused separately during the 30-minute stabilization period and maintained throughout the experiment.
Hydrogen Peroxide Measurement
Because catalase (which decomposes hydrogen peroxide) seems to be not liposoluble enough to allow mesenteric treatment, hydrogen peroxide formation was evaluated in the plasma by using the ferric xylenol orange hydroperoxide assay, as described by Dringen et al.15
Drugs
The following drugs were used: 17ß-estradiol and 17ß-estradiol + progesterone 21 day-release pellets (Innovative Research of America); hydroethidine (Polysciences); ethidium bromide (Gibco); MnTMPyP (Oxis Research); losartan (Merck Sharp & Dohme); diclofenac potassium (Geigy); verapamil (Knoll); and chloral hydrate, mannitol, DPI, oxypurinol, L-NAME, ferric ammonium sulfate, xylenol orange, sorbitol, sulfuric acid (Sigma).
Statistical Analysis
The results are shown as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric test Kruskal-Wallis for multiple comparisons. Values were considered statistically significant when P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma Hormonal Levels
Hormonal levels in female SHR in physiological estrous were: estrogen (203.2±13.3 pg/mL; n=8); progesterone (596.3±9.4 pg/mL; n=8); LH (9.2±1.5 ng/mL; n=8); and FSH (25.6±1.3 ng/mL; n=8). A decrease in estrogen (67.3±11.5 pg/mL; n=8; P<0.05) and progesterone (275.2±6.0 pg/mL; n=8; P<0.05) levels as well as an increase in LH (31.3±3.7 ng/mL; n=8; P<0.05), but not in FSH (38.5±3.0 ng/mL; n=8) levels were observed after the ovariectomy. Treatment with estradiol increased serum estradiol (184.5±10.8 pg/mL; n=8), but not progesterone (279.5±5.8 pg/mL; n=8), to levels observed in OE SHR. Estradiol + progesterone treatment increased the serum concentrations of both estrogen (190.4±17.3 pg/mL; n=8) and progesterone (615.6±8.2 pg/mL; n=8) in OVX SHR. The elevated LH levels in OVX decreased after treatment with estradiol (8.2±2.1 ng/mL; n=8) and estradiol + progesterone (8.6±1.2 ng/mL; n=8), demonstrating the effectiveness of the hormonal treatments in OVX SHR.
Intravital Microscopy
During continuous superfusion with hydroethidine, no significant changes in microvascular diameter were observed (data not shown). As illustrated in Figure 1, EB fluorescence was markedly enhanced in OVX arterioles compared with OE. Figure 2A represents the time course for the relative number of EB-positive nuclei (percent) along the mesenteric arteriolar wall of OE and OVX. Compared with OE, the number of EB-positive nuclei in arterioles from OVX was significantly increased at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the onset of hydroethidine superfusion. The OVX overproduction of oxyradicals was corrected by estrogen treatment (Figures 1 and 2B). The association of estradiol with progesterone did not change the responses observed with estradiol (Figures 1 and 2C).
|
|
The oxidation of hydroethidine along the mesenteric arterioles was significantly attenuated by the superoxide dismutase mimetic MnTMPyP (Figure 3A), but not by the hydroxyl radical scavenger mannitol (Figure 3B), suggesting that superoxide anion is the most likely ROS involved in the increased oxidative stress observed in OVX. L-NAME superfusion did not have any significant effect in the number of EB-positive nuclei in both OE and OVX arterioles (Figure 3C), demonstrating that there was no correlation between NO generation and hydroethidine oxidation.
|
The enhanced number of EB-positive nuclei observed in OVX was significantly attenuated by treatment with the NADPH oxidase inhibitor DPI (Figure 4A). DPI also induced a slight and less significant decrease in hydroethidine oxidation in microvessels from OE SHR (Figure 4A). There were no changes after oxypurinol treatment (Figure 4B). Changes in BP do not seem to be associated with superoxide generation, since losartan (Figure 5A), but not verapamil (Figure 5B) treatment attenuated the hydroethidine oxidation. Although an effect of AT1 receptor blockade in superoxide generation was observed, the decrease in EB-positive nuclei after losartan treatment was similar in OVX and OE arterioles (Figure 5A). Diclofenac treatment did not have any effect either in BP (data not shown) or in hydroethidine oxidation (Figure 5C).
|
|
Hydrogen Peroxide Measurement
Plasma hydrogen peroxide concentration was not increased in OVX SHR in comparison with that in OE SHR (80.6±14.6 versus 74.2±15.2 nmol/L, respectively). In addition, no differences in plasma hydrogen peroxide were detected after estradiol or estradiol + progesterone treatments (67.6±11.3 versus 71.6±10.5 nmol/L, respectively).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under these circumstances, we can suggest that oxidative stress is significantly enhanced after ovariectomy. To confirm that estrogen accounted for the differences in oxidative stress, OVX SHR received pellets containing estradiol or estradiol + progesterone. After the hormonal treatment, the concentrations of estrogen and progesterone were comparable with that seen in OE SHR, demonstrating that the oxidative stress in microvessels from female SHR is influenced by physiological levels of estrogen. Our data also imply that progesterone does not interfere with estrogens antioxidant effects. In fact, many in vitro studies have shown that various estrogens, but not progesterone, are important scavengers of oxyradicals generated both in an aqueous and lipophilic environment.16,17 Furthermore, even though progesterone itself has been reported to have pro-oxidative features,18 many studies have demonstrated that when administrated concomitantly with estrogen, progesterone does not modify the antioxidant potential of estrogen.17
Hydroethidine has been used as a tool to detect spontaneous oxidative changes in the microcirculation under in vivo conditions.12 Although hydroethidine oxidation to EB is caused more rapidly by superoxide than by hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radical,19 we cannot exclude a role for the last two reactive species on the increased oxidative stress in OVX SHR. Our data showing that superoxide is the most likely ROS involved in hydroethidine oxidation are in agreement with other studies that used hydroethidine to detect oxidative stress.19 In addition, these results allow us to suggest that estrogen withdrawal leads to increased generation of superoxide anion. Corroborating our in vivo data, many in vitro studies have demonstrated that estrogen can decrease superoxide concentrations in both cell culture10 and in isolated vessels.9 Recently, we have demonstrated that long-term depletion of estrogen aggravates the endothelial dysfunction in isolated microvessels from SHR by enhancing superoxide production.6
In contrast, because of their phenolic molecular structure, several estrogens have been described to act preferentially as hydroxyl scavengers.20,21 In the present study, although mannitol had no significant effects on hydroethidine oxidation in OE there was a small decrease in the oxidative stress in OVX rats and we cannot rule out an additional effect of estrogen on hydroxyl radical concentration. Phenolic estrogens, such as 17ß-estradiol, estrone, or estriol, are able to act as hydroxyl scavengers by virtue of the hydrogen-donating capacity of their phenolic groups.16,21 Differences in the molecular structures among the several types of estrogens may explain this contrast. Recent data have shown that catecholestrogens, the estrogen-derived metabolites with an ortho-diphenol structure (eg, 2-hydroxyestradiol, a major metabolite of 17ß-estradiol), are more potent antioxidants and reach a greater variety of reactive species than their monophenolic precursor (eg, 17ß-estradiol) in a number of different biological models.16 Because this study was carried out in vivo, whether the phenolic 17ß-estradiol or its catecholic metabolite is responsible for the decreased superoxide concentration remains an opened question.
Superoxide is known to react rapidly with nitric oxide (NO) in solution, with a constant rate of 6.7x109 M-1s-1, which is about three times greater than that of dismutation catalyzed by SOD (2.0x109 M-1s-1), leading to the reciprocal inactivation of both free radicals.22 Therefore, a decrease in vascular superoxide concentration may be influenced by an enhancement in NO concentration. Because a modulatory role of estrogen on NO generation7 has been demonstrated, we decided to investigate the role of NO on hydroethidine oxidation. In agreement with previous studies, our data show that endogenous NO does not appear to regulate superoxide concentration, perhaps because the production of superoxide largely exceeds that of NO in the animal model studied herein.23
The exact mechanisms through which estrogen has antioxidant effects are not completely elucidated. As previously mentioned, the antioxidant effects of estrogens may be related to its phenolic or catecholic structure10,21 implying a direct, nonreceptor-dependent mechanism. However, the scavenger property of estrogen was observed at low micromolar concentrations. Because the physiological plasma concentration of estrogens is in the nanomolar range, a direct scavenger effect might not be the major mechanism involved in the antioxidant effects of estrogens. It has been hypothesized that estrogen modulates the generation of free radicals by interacting with its nuclear receptor and by decreasing oxidative proteins and/or increasing antioxidant enzymes expression. Many studies have established that the antioxidant effect of 17ß-estradiol (an estrogen with high affinity for the estrogen receptor) is specific, it is not observed with 17
-estradiol (low affinity for the estrogen receptor despite its phenolic group)24, and it is reduced in the presence of estrogen-receptor antagonists.25 In fact, changes in estradiol levels have been associated with altered levels of glutathione peroxidase,26 catalase26, and superoxide dismutase.27 Recent studies have shown a modulatory effect of estrogen on superoxide generation, via a modulation in AT-1 receptor gene expression.9 On the other hand, there are no studies evaluating the influence of estrogen on other sources of free radicals, such as NADH/NADPH oxidases and xanthine oxidases in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells.
Further studies are necessary to identify the exact mechanisms by which estrogen exerts its antioxidant effects. As a primary effort, we evaluated the effect of estrogen withdrawal on the activity of pro-oxidative enzymes. There are a variety of intracellular sources of free radicals that include, but are not limited to, NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and cyclooxygenase.28 Considering that information, hydroethidine oxidation was studied in the presence of NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase and cyclooxygenase inhibitors (DPI, oxypurinol, and diclofenac, respectively). The finding that DPI treatment, but not oxypurinol or diclofenac, substantially attenuated the oxidation of hydroethidine in OVX microvessels and caused a slight decrease in vessels from OE, suggests an increased activity of NADPH oxidase during estrogen deficiency.
Several observations suggest that the NADPH oxidase system accounts for the majority of superoxide generation in the vessel wall.29 An overactivity of this enzyme, associated with an overexpression of p22 phox (a component of NADPH-oxidase), has been linked to the increased superoxide generation in some pathological conditions, such as hypertension.29,30 In addition, it has been demonstrated that some steroid hormones, such as glucocorticoids, can decrease superoxide levels in aortic smooth muscle cells by modulating p22 phox gene expression.31 Further studies are necessary to elucidate whether estrogen can also decrease superoxide generation by modulating p22 phox expression.
The effects of estrogen deprivation on AT1 receptor-induced superoxide generation was evaluated as well. In agreement with previous studies, our data show that Ang II, by interacting with AT1 receptors,32 can stimulate oxidative stress in SHR. However, it is important to state that a similar degree of decrease in EB-positive nuclei after losartan treatment was found in both OVX and OE arterioles. For this reason, we conclude that even though the AT1 receptor may play a role in superoxide generation in female SHR, this pro-oxidative pathway cannot account for the differences in oxidative stress between OVX and OE. These findings seem to be contradictory to reports showing that estrogen deficiency leads to increased free radical production associated to an enhanced expression of vascular AT1 receptors.9 However, these differences may be related to the vascular bed, because most of previous data were derived from aorta and not from arterioles. In fact, numerous studies have demonstrated disparity in AT1 receptor number, in protein, and mRNA levels among different vessels from different sizes.33
It has been stated that an increase in intravascular pressure elicits release of superoxide anion.14 Considering that estrogen and losartan treatments reduced BP in OVX rats, it is plausible that a decrease in intravascular pressure may be responsible for the decreased oxidative stress observed in these animals. However, because verapamil treatment decreased BP, but did not affect hydroethidine oxidation, we can rule out that changes in BP (at least at the levels observed herein) are mediating the changes in superoxide generation.
In summary, our study shows that estrogen at physiological concentrations can act as an antioxidant in vivo. Although the precise mechanisms by which estrogen exerts its antioxidant effect remains to be elucidated, we have shown that NADPH oxidase inhibition attenuated superoxide production in the absence of estrogen suggests that estrogen has a modulatory role on NADPH oxidase activity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 23, 2001; first decision October 8, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regiments on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Intervention (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 1995; 273: 199208.
3. Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1997; 14: S83S93.
4. Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Mattei P, Sudano I, Bernini G, Pinto S, Salvetti A. Menopause is associated with endothelial dysfunction in women. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 576582.
5. Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Pinto S, Lombardo M, Petraglia F, Gennazzani A, Buralli S, Taddei S, Salvetti A. Mechanisms responsible for endothelial dysfunction associated with acute estrogen deprivation in normotensive women. Circulation. 2000; 101: 22582263.
6. Dantas APV, Scivoletto R, Fortes ZB, Nigro D, Carvalho MHC. Influence of female sex hormones on endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor prostanoid generation in microvessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 914919.
7. Hayashi T, Yamada K, Esaki M, Kuzuya M, Satake S. Estrogen increase endothelial nitric oxide by a receptor-mediated system. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1995; 214: 847855.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Panza JA. Endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. Clin Cardiol. 1997; 20: II26II33.
9. Wassmann S, Bäumer AT, Strehlow K, van Eickels M, Grohé C, Ahlbory K, Rösen R, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress during estrogen deficiency in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 2000; 103: 435441.
10. Dubey RK, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Gillespie DG, Branch RA, Jackson EK, Kagan VE. Estrogen and tamoxifen metabolites protect smooth muscle cell membrane phospholipids against peroxidation and inhibit cell growth. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 229239.
11. Shwaery GT, Vita JA, Keaney JF, Jr. Antioxidant protection of LDL by physiological concentrations of 17ß-estradiol: requirement for estradiol modification. Circulation. 1997; 95: 13781385.
12. Suzuki H, Swei A, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schonbein GW. In vivo evidence for microvascular oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 10831089.
13. Oliveira MA, Fortes ZB, Santos RA, Kosla MC, De Carvalho MH. Synergistic effect of angiotensin-(17) on bradykinin arteriolar dilation in vivo. Peptides. 1999; 20: 11951201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Huang A, Sun D, Kaley G, Koller A. Superoxide released to high intra-arteriolar pressure reduces nitric oxide-mediated shear stress and agonist-induced dilations. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 960965.
15. Dringen R, Kussmaul L, Hamprecht B. Detoxication of exogenous hydrogen peroxide and organics hydroperoxides by cultured astroglial cells assessed by microtiter plate assay. Brain Res Prot. 1998; 2: 223228.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ruiz-Larrea MB, Martin C, Martinez R, Navarro R, Lacort M, Miller NJ. Antioxidant activities of estrogen against aqueous and lipophilic radicals; differences between phenol and catechol estrogens. Chem Phys Lip. 2000; 105: 179188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bekesi G, Kakus R, Varbiro S, Racz K, Sprintz D, Feher J, Szekacs B. In vitro effects of different steroid hormones on superoxide anion production of human neutrophil granulocytes. Steroids. 2000; 65: 889894.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. de Lamirande E, Harakat A, Gagnon C. Human sperm capacitation induced by biological fluids and progesterone, but not by NADH or NADPH, is associated with the production of superoxide anion. J Androl. 1998; 19: 215225.
19. Benov L, Sztejnberg L, Fridovich A. Critical evaluation of the use of hydroethidine as a measure of superoxide anion radical. Free Rad Biol Med. 1998; 25: 826831.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. McHugh NA, Merrill GF, Powell SR. Estrogen diminishes postischemic hydroxyl radical production. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274: H1950H1954.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Haliwell B, Grootveld M. The measurement of free radical reactions in humans. Some thoughts for future experimentation. FEBS Lett. 1987; 213: 916.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Vasquez-Vivar J, Hogg N, Pritchard KA, Jr., Martasek P, Kalyanaraman B. Superoxide anion formation from lucigenin: an electron spin resonance spin-trapping study. FEBS Lett. 1997; 403: 127130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Pagano PJ, Tornheim K, Cohen RA. Superoxide anion production by rabbit thoracic aorta: effect of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265: H707H712.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kim YD, Chem B, Farhat MY, Lees DE. 17-ß estradiol prevents dysfunction of canine coronary endothelium and myocardium and reperfusion arrhythmias after brief ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. 1996; 94: 29012908.
25. Arnal JF, Clamens S, Pechet C, Negre SA, Allera C, Girolami JP, Salvayre R, Bayard F. Ethinylestradiol does not enhance the expression of nitric oxide synthase in bovine endothelial cells but increases the release of bioactive nitric oxide by inhibiting superoxide anion production. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996; 93: 41084113.
26. Capel I, Jenner M, Williams D. The effect of prolonged oral contraceptives steroid use on erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity. J Steroid Biochem. 1981; 14: 729732.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Oberley TD, Shultz JL, Oberley LW. In vivo modulation of antioxidant enzyme levels in normal hamster kidney and estrogen-induced kidney tumor. Free Radical Biol Med. 1994; 16: 741751.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kehrer JP. Free radical as mediators of tissue injury and disease. Crit Ver Toxicol. 1993; 23: 2148.
29. Mohazzab KM, Kaminski PM, Wolin MS. NADH oxidoreductase is a major source of superoxide anion in bovine coronary artery endothelium. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: H2568H2572.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Zalba G, Beaumont FJ, San-José G, Fortuño A, Fortuño MA, Etayo JC, Díez J. Vascular NADH/NADPH oxidase is involved in enhanced superoxide production in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 10551061.
31. Marumo T, Schini-Kerth VB, Brandes RP, Busse R. Glucocorticoids inhibit superoxide anion production and p22 phox mRNA expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 10831088.
32. Khaper N, Singal PK. Modulation of oxidative stress by a selective inhibition of angiotensin II type 1 receptors in MI rats. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 14611466.
33. Nora EH, Tonellato PJ, Greene AS. Quantification of the contribution of type 1 and type 2 angiotensin II receptors to the net tissue specific effect of angiotensin II. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000; 28: 653664.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Xue, Y. Zhao, A. K. Johnson, and M. Hay Central estrogen inhibition of angiotensin II-induced hypertension in male mice and the role of reactive oxygen species Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1025 - H1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lopez-Sepulveda, R. Jimenez, M. Romero, M. J. Zarzuelo, M. Sanchez, M. Gomez-Guzman, F. Vargas, F. O'Valle, A. Zarzuelo, F. Perez-Vizcaino, et al. Wine Polyphenols Improve Endothelial Function in Large Vessels of Female Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1088 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. D'Agostino, R. W. Putnam, and J. B. Dean Superoxide ({middle dot}O2 ) Production in CA1 Neurons of Rat Hippocampal Slices Exposed to Graded Levels of Oxygen J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 1030 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pincemail, S. Vanbelle, U. Gaspard, G. Collette, J. Haleng, J.P. Cheramy-Bien, C. Charlier, J.P. Chapelle, D. Giet, A. Albert, et al. Effect of different contraceptive methods on the oxidative stress status in women aged 40 48 years from the ELAN study in the province of Liege, Belgium Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2335 - 2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Murphy and C. Steenbergen Gender-based differences in mechanisms of protection in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2007; 75(3): 478 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Miller, G. R. Drummond, A. E. Mast, H. H.H.W. Schmidt, and C. G. Sobey Effect of Gender on NADPH-Oxidase Activity, Expression, and Function in the Cerebral Circulation: Role of Estrogen Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2142 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gimenez, M. P. Garcia, M. Serna, B. Bonacasa, L. F. Carbonell, T. Quesada, and I. Hernandez 17{beta}-Oestradiol enhances the acute hypotensive effect of captopril in female ovariectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats Exp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 91(4): 715 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. V. Dantas and K. Sandberg Estrogen Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}: A Missing Link Between Menopause and Cardiovascular Risk in Women? Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 21 - 22. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao, J. Joseph, H. M. Fales, E. A. Sokoloski, R. L. Levine, J. Vasquez-Vivar, and B. Kalyanaraman Detection and characterization of the product of hydroethidine and intracellular superoxide by HPLC and limitations of fluorescence PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5727 - 5732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Reckelhoff Sex Steroids, Cardiovascular Disease, and Hypertension: Unanswered Questions and Some Speculations Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 170 - 174. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. d. C. P. Franco, Z. B. Fortes, E. H. Akamine, E. M. Kawamoto, C. Scavone, L. R. G. de Britto, M. N. Muscara, S. A. Teixeira, R. C. A. Tostes, M. H. C. Carvalho, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelial dysfunction and vascular oxidative stress in microvessels of intrauterine undernourished rats J. Physiol., July 1, 2004; 558(1): 239 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. V Dantas, M. d. C. P Franco, M. M Silva-Antonialli, R. C.A Tostes, Z. B Fortes, D. Nigro, and M. H. C Carvalho Gender differences in superoxide generation in microvessels of hypertensive rats: role of NAD(P)H-oxidase Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2004; 61(1): 22 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Muller-Delp, D. B. Lubahn, K. E. Nichol, B. J. Philips, E. M. Price, E. M. Curran, and M. H. Laughlin Regulation of nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation in coronary arteries of estrogen receptor-{alpha}-deficient mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H2150 - H2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Chappell, P. E. Gallagher, D. B. Averill, C. M. Ferrario, and K. B. Brosnihan Estrogen or the AT1 Antagonist Olmesartan Reverses the Development of Profound Hypertension in the Congenic mRen2.Lewis Rat Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 781 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Callera, R. M. Touyz, S. A. Teixeira, M. N. Muscara, M. H. C. Carvalho, Z. B. Fortes, D. Nigro, E. L. Schiffrin, and R. C. Tostes ETA Receptor Blockade Decreases Vascular Superoxide Generation in DOCA-Salt Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 811 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. d. C. P Franco, R. M. M.P Arruda, A. P. V. Dantas, E. M. Kawamoto, Z. B Fortes, C. Scavone, M. H. C Carvalho, R. C.A Tostes, and D. Nigro Intrauterine undernutrition: expression and activity of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase in male and female adult offspring Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2002; 56(1): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Edelberg Auto Repair on the Aging Stem Cell Superhighway Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., September 4, 2002; 2002(35): pe13 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |