Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;39:619-623
doi: 10.1161/hy0202.103298
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deddish, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Erdös, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deddish, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Erdös, E. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors

(Hypertension. 2002;39:619.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Neprilysin Inhibitors Potentiate Effects of Bradykinin on B2 Receptor

Peter A. Deddish; Branislav M. Marcic; Fulong Tan; Herbert L. Jackman; Zhenlong Chen; Ervin G. Erdös

From the Departments of Pharmacology (P.A.D., B.M.M., F.T., H.L.J., Z.C., E.G.E.) and Anesthesiology (E.G.E.), University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago.

Correspondence to Peter A. Deddish, PhD, Department of Pharmacology (M/C 868), University of Illinois-Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail pdeddish{at}uic.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Some beneficial effects of angiotensin-I–converting enzyme (ACE, kininase II) inhibitor therapy are attributed to enhancing the activity of bradykinin on its B2 receptor. Independent of inhibition of bradykinin hydrolysis, ACE inhibitors enhance the action of bradykinin on its B2 receptor by inducing crosstalk between ACE and the receptor. We investigated whether inhibitors of another kininase II-type enzyme, neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase 24.11; NEP), could augment bradykinin effects unrelated to blocking its breakdown using a NEP-resistant bradykinin analog as ligand. We used transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing human B2 receptor and NEP (CHO/NEP-B2) or only B2 (CHO/B2) as control and human pulmonary fibroblasts (IMR90), expressing B2, but more NEP than ACE. NEP inhibitor phosphoramidon (100 nmol/L), or omapatrilat, which inhibits both NEP and ACE, did not potentiate bradykinin in CHO/B2 cells. In IMR90 cells, 10 nmol/L bradykinin elevated [Ca2+]i and desensitized the receptor. Adding either 100 nmol/L omapatrilat or phosphoramidon resensitized the receptor to the ligand, which was abolished by receptor blocker HOE 140. Arachidonic acid release by bradykinin from CHO/NEP-B2 cells was also augmented by 100 nmol/L phosphoramidon or omapatrilat about 3-fold, and again, the inhibitors resensitized the desensitized B2 receptor. The inhibitors did not potentiate bradykinin when soluble rNEP was added to the medium of CHO/B2 cells. Similar to ACE, NEP inhibitors potentiated bradykinin independent of inhibiting inactivation. Consequently, omapatrilat could augment bradykinin effects on B2, when either ACE or NEP is expressed close to receptor on cell membrane.


Key Words: G proteins • calcium • arachidonic acids • angiotensin-converting enzyme • receptors, bradykinin • fibroblasts


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We wished to establish whether, besides angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE), inhibitors of another kininase II-type enzyme,1 neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase 24.11, CD10, NEP), can also augment the effects of bradykinin (BK) on its B2 receptor. This was to be tested on cells where expression of NEP is much higher than that of ACE. Although both enzymes cleave BK at a Pro7-Phe8 bond and are Zn metallopeptidases,1,2 they differ from each other in many ways. NEP cleaves higher molecular weight peptide substrates than does ACE. NEP hydrolyzes BK with a larger turnover number, but the Km of the peptide is also higher; consequently, ACE in solution has a higher specificity constant (500 min-1µmol/L-1) than that of NEP (40 min-1µmol/L-1).2,3 Both human enzymes are concentrated in proximal tubular cells4–6 and seminal plasma,7 but endothelial cells are much richer in ACE, whereas fibroblasts express more NEP.8,9 ACE and NEP are ectoenzymes on plasma membranes, but ACE is type I, a transmembrane enzyme,10 whereas NEP is type II.11 The former is inserted into the membrane at its C-terminus,10,12 but, in the latter, the transmembrane anchor is at the N-terminus.11 The distribution of ACE and NEP also differs in various species; for example, in rat heart13 and urine14 NEP is a major kininase.

In the present experiments, we used a BK analog (BKan) that activates the B2 receptor, but is resistant to ACE and carboxypeptidase15,16 and, as shown below, to NEP. To study the crosstalk between the BK B2 receptor and NEP, we transfected cells to express human NEP and B2 receptor alone or together and used a human fibroblast cell line with native B2 receptor but with much more NEP than ACE. Both specific ACE and NEP inhibitors (enalaprilat and phosphoramidon) and the dual inhibitor omapatrilat were tested.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells and human fetal lung fibroblast (IMR)-90 cells were from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md). Purified human recombinant neprilysin (rNEP) and the cDNA of human neprilysin were gifts from Prof Philippe Crine (Université de Montreal). The cDNA of human ACE, the cDNA encoding the human BK B2 receptor, and the neomycin resistant gene (pHßApr-3p-neo) were from Prof P. Corvol (College de France, Paris), Syntex Co. (Palo Alto, CA), and Dr L.H. Kedes (University of Southern California, Los Angeles), respectively. Omapatrilat [(4S-{4{alpha},7{alpha},10aß})-octahydro-4-({2-mercapto-1-oxo-3-phenylpropyl}amino)-5-oxo-7H-pyrido(2,1-b)(1,3)-thiazepine-7-carboxylic acid] was from Bristol-Myers Squibb Research Institute. Mammalian expression vector pcDNA6/V5-His and blasticidin were from Invitrogen; lipofectin and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were from Gibco BRL. [5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15-3H(N)]-arachidonic acid (AA; 100 Ci/mmol) was from American Radiolabeled Chemicals. BK, phosphoramidon [N-({alpha}-rhamnopyranosyloxyhydroxyphosphinyl)-Leu-Trp], culture media, and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemicals. Enalaprilat was provided by Merck, Sharp and Dohme Research Division. [Phe8{Psi}-(CH2NH)Arg9]-bradykinin (BKan) was from Novabiochem.

Human NEP Construct
Plasmid pRcCMV/NEP (provided by Prof Crine) was digested with EcoRI restriction enzyme to obtain the full-length NEP cDNA, which was ligated into the pcDNA6/V5-His expression vector and used for transfecting CHO/B2 cells.17

Cell Culture
CHO cells were grown, subcultured, and transfected as described.16,17 Following transfection, cells were subjected to selection using Ham’s F-12 medium, containing 10 µg/mL blasticidin (pcDNA6 vector contains blasticidin resistance gene). After selection, clones were harvested and propagated using cloning rings. The clone with the highest NEP activity was chosen for continued culture. IMR-90 cells were grown in minimum essential Eagle’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum.

Measurement of [Ca2+]i and [3H] AA
[Ca2+]i was measured using a microspectro-fluorometer (PTI Deltascan or Attofluor Ratiovision), and the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye, fura-2/AM, on cells grown to confluence. [3H] AA release was assayed as before.17

Potentiation of BK, Desensitization and Resensitization of the Receptor
Monolayers of CHO/NEP-B2 cells, loaded with [3H] AA, were exposed to 10 nmol/L BKan given alone, or together with the potentiating agent to be tested for 30 or 60 minutes. [3H] AA released into the medium was determined.

In control experiments, omapatrilat or phosphoramidon was ineffective in cells that lacked NEP or in the absence of receptor agonist. To show the involvement of the B2 BK receptor, its blocker HOE 140 (0.1 to 1.0 µmol/L) was used routinely. After desensitization by initial exposure of cells to kinin, sensitivity to BKan (resensitization by NEP inhibitor) was measured either by [3H] AA release or by elevation of [Ca2+]i level.16,17

Enzyme Assay
Generally, the activity of NEP was determined from the percent inhibition with 1 µmol/L phosphoramidon at pH 6.518 with Glut-Ala-Ala-Phe-methoxynaphthylamine (MNA) (Enzyme System Products) substrate. ACE activity was assayed with hippuryl-His-Leu at pH 8.0, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and with or without 1 µmol/L enalaprilat as inhibitor. Crude cell homogenates were prepared by harvesting cells into ice-cold Tris-maleate pH 7.4 buffer and disrupted by a sonic dismembranator (Artek Corp); after, they were briefly centrifuged at 1,000g to remove intact cells and nuclei.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Resistance of BKan to NEP Hydrolysis
The resistance of BKan to hydrolysis by ACE was reported.16 Whether BKan could be cleaved by human rNEP was tested by comparing the hydrolysis of BK and BKan under similar conditions, followed by analysis of reaction products by HPLC using standards to identify and quantitate product peaks. The Table shows that while 77±3.2% of BK was hydrolyzed by rNEP in 60 minutes, no BKan was cleaved. Thus, besides ACE, this pseudopeptide analogue of BK is also highly resistant to NEP. The interaction of BKan with NEP was also probed by determining if BKan could competitively inhibit the hydrolysis of BK by NEP. BKan (25 µmol/L) did not inhibit significantly the hydrolysis of BK (50 µmol/L) by NEP after 20 minutes of preincubation with the enzyme (n=4), demonstrating a very low affinity for the active site of NEP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hydrolysis of Bradykinin and Bradykinin Analog by Human Recombinant Neutral Endopeptidase*

Suitability of IMR-90 Cells
IMR-90 cells are an established, well-characterized, and widely used cell line of normal human embryonic fibroblasts. They express the BK B2 receptor.19 To determine the ratio of NEP to ACE, we assayed NEP and ACE in IMR-90 cell lysates. IMR-90 cell lysates were incubated with Glut-Ala-Ala-Phe-MNA or hippuryl-His-Leu substrates. Cleavage, or inhibition by the specific inhibitors phosphoramidon or enalaprilat (1 µmol/L), was taken as NEP and ACE activities in the cells. The actual amount of each enzyme in the lysate was calculated from the established kinetic parameters for these enzymes.20 Cell lysates contained 1.34±0.04 pmoles of NEP and 97.6±9.2 fmoles (n=3) of ACE per mg protein. Thus, IMR-90 cells constitutively express bradykinin B2 receptors, NEP, and ACE with a ratio of 14:1.

Resensitization of Bradykinin B2 Receptor by Omapatrilat
In experiments with transfected CHO cells expressing both ACE and B2 receptor (CHO/AB), changes in [Ca2+]i were measured using BK as agonist, and either phosphoramidon, enalaprilat, or omapatrilat to resensitize the receptor. The inhibitor was added to make the cell’s B2 receptor, desensitized by the agonist, respond a second time to BK in the medium.16,17,21 Using CHO/AB cells with BK (10 or 100 nmol/L) as agonist, phosphoramidon (1 µmol/L) did not resensitize the receptor (Figure 1A; n=3) as expected, because the cells lacked NEP. However, in these cells, the dual inhibitor omapatrilat (Figure 1B; n=3) and the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat (100 nmol/L; not shown) resensitized the B2 receptor because the cells responded to the agonist a second time, in agreement with previous findings.16,17,21–23 The inhibitors induced an enzyme receptor crosstalk leading to enhanced BK effect on the receptor via ACE, as these cells have no native NEP (unpublished data, 2001; results not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, In CHO cells expressing B2 receptor and ACE, bradykinin (BK; 10 nmol/L) elevates [Ca2+]i level, and the NEP inhibitor phosphoramidon (PPAD; 100 nmol/L) does not resensitize the receptor to BK (n=3). B, In the same cells, the dual ACE and NEP inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA; 100 nmol/L) does resensitize the receptor to BK (n=3).

Resensitization of B2 Receptor in IMR-90 Cells
Addition of 10 nmol/L BKan to IMR-90 cells increased [Ca2+]i level within seconds. After desensitization of the B2 receptor with the first dose of the agonist (a second dose of BKan had no effect), phosphoramidon (100 nmol/L; Figure 2A) or omapatrilat (100 nmol/L; Figure 2B) resensitized the receptor to BKan present in the medium. These results indicate that in IMR-90 cells, the NEP inhibitor and omapatrilat, the dual inhibitor, affected the B2 receptor through NEP. The effect of enalaprilat activity was insignificant (100 nmol/L; Figure 2C; n=4) in these cells with low expression of ACE. The dual enzyme inhibitor, omapatrilat, on the other hand, increased [Ca2+]i 3.9±0.9-fold while phosphoramidon elevated it 1.8±0.1-fold when resensitizing B2 receptor to its ligand. The addition of phosphoramidon or omapatrilat to the IMR-90 cells in the absence of the peptide agonist did not change the intracellular calcium level, although cells could still respond to added ligand (not shown). Just as proven with ACE inhibitors,16,17,21 the NEP inhibitors in the absence of BK did not activate the receptor.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In IMR-90 cells naturally expressing B2 receptor, NEP and ACE, bradykinin analogue (BKan; 10 nmol/L) increased [Ca2+]i level. A, Phosphoramidon (PPAD; 100 nmol/L) or B, Omapatrilat (OMA; 100 nmol/L) resensitized the receptor to BKan in the medium. C, Enalaprilat (ENAL; 100 nmol/L) insignificantly resensitized the receptor; cells had a low level of ACE. Insets show the mean response of the 100 cells measured in each case (n=4).

Figure 3 shows that the addition of HOE 140 (100 nmol/L) to the cells after stimulation with BKan (10 nmol/L), but before addition of omapatrilat (100 nmol/L; n=5), blocked the resensitization of the receptor to the BKan present in the medium. Consequently, resensitization was due to the reactivation of the B2 receptor.22,23



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Addition of the B2 receptor blocker HOE 140 (100 nmol/L) to IMR-90 cells after the initial response to bradykinin analogue (BKan; 100 nmol/L) blocked the resensitization by omapatrilat (OMA; 100 nmol/L) of the receptor to BKan in the medium (n=5).

Resensitization of Receptor in CHO/NEP-B2 Cells
Figure 4 shows that in transfected cells expressing both the B2 receptor and NEP, the addition of phosphoramidon resensitized the B2 receptor and induced a transient increase in [Ca2+]i.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. In CHO/NEP-B2 cells expressing B2 receptor and NEP, addition of bradykinin analogue (BKan; 10 nmol/L) increased [Ca2+]i level. Phosphoramidon (PPAD; 100 nmol/L) resensitized the receptor, inducing a transient increase in [Ca2+]i (n=3).

When CHO/NEP-B2 cells were loaded with [3H] AA, inhibitors of NEP also augmented the release of AA by kinin. AA release stimulated by addition of BKan (10 nmol/L) for 30 minutes was measured first in each experiment. Phosphoramidon (100 nmol/L) increased AA release by BKan 2.9±0.6-fold (n=3), and omapatrilat (100 nmol/L) increased AA release 2.6±0.4-fold (n=3). Thus, both phosphoramidon and omapatrilat increased the release of AA by BKan in CHO/NEP-B2 cells.

In CHO cells expressing only B2 receptor (CHO/B2), but neither ACE nor NEP, addition of 100 nmol/L omapatrilat following 10 nmol/L BKan did not resensitize the B2 receptor as measured by changes in [Ca2+]i. Thus, omapatrilat did not affect the B2 receptor in the absence of ACE and NEP (not shown).

In other control experiments, soluble human rNEP (50 ng/mL) was added to the medium of CHO/B2 cells. Under these conditions, when NEP was not expressed on the plasma membrane but instead dissolved in the medium, neither phosphoramidon nor omapatrilat resensitized the B2 receptors to BKan (not shown; n=3).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
ACE (kininase II) inhibitors have been used to treat millions of patients worldwide. Their beneficial effects,24,25 however, cannot be explained only by blocking Ang II release or BK inactivation. ACE inhibitors indirectly enhance the effect of BK on its B2 receptor by inducing a protein-protein interaction (ie, a crosstalk between the enzyme and the receptor).16,17,22,23 Experiments in support of this hypothesis were done on the guinea pig ileum26 and atrial tissues,27 hog coronary arteries,28 and cultured cells that were transfected or constitutively expressed ACE and B2 receptor by using BK and its partially or fully ACE-resistant analogs.16,17,22,23

This enhancement of the B2 receptor activation leads to an increased release of arachidonic acid and IP3, and elevation of [Ca2+]i level, which can lead to an augmented liberation of prostaglandins and NO. Besides potentiating BK effects, ACE inhibitors resensitize the receptor after it has been desensitized by an agonist.16,17,21–23 ACE and B2 receptors have to be sterically close to induce an interaction.16 The enhanced activation of BK receptor initiates a signal transduction pathway that differs from the primary effect of BK.22 As shown above, the inhibition of NEP also enhances the effect of BK and the NEP-resistant BKan on the B2 receptor. This was investigated with CHO-AB cells transfected to express ACE and B2 receptor17, and CHO-NEP/B2 cells transfected to express NEP and B2. Specific inhibitors enalaprilat and phosphoramidon enhanced the effect of BK only in the cell line that expressed either ACE or NEP, whereas omapatrilat elevated the effect of BKan in both cell types; thus, omapatrilat acted on both ACE and NEP to potentiate BK and resensitize the receptor. In the IMR-90 cells that constitutively express NEP overwhelmingly more than ACE, enalaprilat potentiated BK much less than phosphoramidon or omapatrilat, or did not potentiate BK at all.

NEP inhibitors had no effect on the B2 receptor in the absence of NEP on the cell membrane. Furthermore, instead of being expressed on the plasma membrane when soluble rNEP was added to the medium, BK was again not potentiated.

All of these results are taken as an indication that NEP inhibitors enhance the effect of BK on its receptor by a mechanism similar to that of ACE inhibitors. Depending on the cell type, activation of the B2 receptor is followed by the release of important vasoactive mediators.29 The experiments showed that omapatrilat potentiated BK in cells where enalaprilat did not. The mode of action of a single inhibitor of both ACE and NEP, resulting in an indirect activation of the B2 receptor, could be responsible for additional beneficial therapeutic effects of vasopeptidase inhibitors such as omapatrilat.30


*    Acknowledgments
 
These studies were supported in part by grants HL58118 and HL36473 from NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and a grant in aid from Bristol Myers-Squibb Co. We are grateful to Sara Bahnmaier for her assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Received September 24, 2001; first decision November 7, 2001; accepted November 21, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Erdös EG, Skidgel RA. Metabolism of bradykinin by peptidases in health and disease.In: Farmer SG, ed. The Kinin System. London, UK: Academic Press; 1997: 112–141.

2. Gafford JT, Skidgel RA, Erdös EG, Hersh LB. Human kidney "enkephalinase", a neutral metalloendopeptidase that cleaves active peptides. Biochemistry. 1983; 22: 3265–3271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Erdös EG, Skidgel RA. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11-enkephalinase and related regulators of peptide hormones. FASEB J. 1989; 3: 145–151.[Abstract]

4. Kerr MA, Kenny AJ. The purification and specificity of a neutral endopeptidase from rabbit kidney brush border. Biochem J. 1974; 137: 477–488.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Hall ER, Kato J, Erdös EG, Robinson CJG, Oshima G. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme in the nephron. Life Sci. 1976; 18: 1299–1304.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Schulz WW, Hagler HK, Buja LM, Erdös EG. Ultrastructural localization of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (EC 3.4.15.1) and neutral metalloendopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) in the proximal tubule of the human kidney. Lab Invest. 1988; 59: 789–797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Erdös EG, Schulz WW, Gafford JT, Defendini R. Neutral metalloendopeptidase in human male genital tract. Comparison to angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Lab Invest. 1985; 52: 437–447.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Llorens-Cortes C, Huang H, Vicart P, Gasc JM, Paulin D, Corvol P. Identification and characterization of neutral endopeptidase in endothelial cells from venous or arterial origins. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 14012–14018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Johnson AR, Ashton J, Schulz WW, Erdos EG. Neutral metalloendopeptidase in human lung tissue and cultured cells. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985; 132: 564–568.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Wei L, Alhenc-Gelas F, Corvol P, Clauser E. The two homologous domains of human angiotensin I-converting enzyme are both catalytically active. J Biol Chem. 1991; 266: 9002–9008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Roy P, Chatellard C, Lemay G, Crine P, Boileau G. Transformation of the signal peptide/membrane anchor domain of a type II transmembrane protein into a cleavable signal peptide. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 2699–2704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Erdös EG, Gafford JT. Human converting enzyme. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1983; A5: 1251–1262.

13. Piedimonte G, Nadel JA, Long CS, Hoffman JI. Neutral endopeptidase in the heart: neutral endopeptidase inhibition prevents isoproterenol-induced myocardial hypoperfusion in rats by reducing bradykinin degradation. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 770–779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Ura N, Carretero OA, Erdös EG. Effect of phosphoramidon, a kininase inhibitor, in renal function and kinin excretion. (Abstract). Am Soc Nephrol. Abstracts of 18th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, La. 1985:199A.

15. Drapeau G, Rhaleb N-E, Dion S, Jukic D, Regoli D. [Phe8 {Psi}(CH2-NH)Arg9]bradykinin, a B2 receptor selective agonist which is not broken down by either kininase I or kininase II. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988; 155: 193–195.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Marcic BM, Deddish PA, Skidgel RA, Erdös EG, Minshall RD. Replacement of the transmembrane anchor in angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol tail affects activation of the B2 bradykinin receptor by ACE inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 16110–16118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Minshall RD, Tan F, Nakamura F, Rabito SF, Becker RP, Marcic B, Erdös EG. Potentiation of the actions of bradykinin by angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors: the role of expressed human bradykinin B2 receptors and ACE in CHO cells. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 848–856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Orlowski M, Wilk S. Purification and specificity of a membrane-bound metalloendopeptidase from bovine pituitaries. Biochemistry. 1981; 20: 4942–4950.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Menke JG, Borkowski JA, Bierilo KK, MacNeil T, Derrick AW, Schneck KA, Ransom RW, Strader CD, Linemeyer DL, Hess JF. Expression cloning of a human B1 bradykinin receptor. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 21583–21586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Dixon M, Webb EC. Enzyme Kinetics.In: Enzymes. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc; 1978: 69.

21. Marcic B, Deddish PA, Jackman HL, Erdös EG. Enhancement of bradykinin and resensitization of its B2 receptor. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 835–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Marcic BM, Erdös EG. Protein kinase C and phosphatase inhibitors block the ability of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors to resensitize the receptor to bradykinin without altering the primary effects of bradykinin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 294: 605–612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Erdös EG, Marcic BM. Kinins, receptors, kininases and inhibitors–where did they lead us? Biol Chem. 2001; 382: 43–47.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Gavras H, Brunner HR. Role of angiotensin and its inhibition in hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 342–345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald I, Moye LA, the Save Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 669–677.[Abstract]

26. Minshall RD, Nedumgottil SJ, Igic R, Erdös EG, Rabito SF. Potentiation of the effects of bradykinin on its receptor in the isolated guinea pig ileum. Peptides. 2000; 24: 1257–1264.[CrossRef]

27. Minshall RD, Erdös EG, Vogel SM. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors potentiate bradykinin’s inotropic effects independently of blocking its inactivation. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: A132–A136.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Tom B, de Vries R, Saxena PR, Danser AH. Bradykinin potentiation by angiotensin-(1–7) and ACE inhibitors correlates with ACE C- and N-domain blockade. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 95–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Bhoola KD, Figueroa CD, Worthy K. Bioregulation of kinins: kallikreins, kininogens, and kininases. Pharmacol Rev. 1992; 44: 1–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Bralet J, Schwartz JC. Vasopeptidase inhibitors: an emerging class of cardiovascular drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001; 22: 106–109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
C. B. Herath, J. S. Lubel, Z. Jia, E. Velkoska, D. Casley, L. Brown, C. Tikellis, L. M. Burrell, and P. W. Angus
Portal pressure responses and angiotensin peptide production in rat liver are determined by relative activity of ACE and ACE2
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): G98 - G106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. E. Scholzen, S. Konig, M. Fastrich, M. Bohm, and T. A. Luger
Terminating the Stress: Peripheral Peptidolysis of Proopiomelanocortin-Derived Regulatory Hormones by the Dermal Microvascular Endothelial Cell Extracellular Peptidases Neprilysin and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme
Endocrinology, June 1, 2007; 148(6): 2793 - 2805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
F. G. Pelorosso, A. V. Halperin, A. M. Palma, W. Nowak, A. E. Errasti, and R. P. Rothlin
Neutral Endopeptidase Up-Regulation in Isolated Human Umbilical Artery: Involvement in Desensitization of Bradykinin-Induced Vasoconstrictor Effects
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 713 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
Z. Chen, P. A. Deddish, R. D. Minshall, R. P. Becker, E. G. Erdos, and F. Tan
Human ACE and bradykinin B2 receptors form a complex at the plasma membrane
FASEB J, November 1, 2006; 20(13): 2261 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
G. Sansoe, M. Aragno, R. Mastrocola, J. C. Cutrin, S. Silvano, G. Mengozzi, A. Smedile, F. Rosina, O. Danni, and M. Rizzetto
Overexpression of kidney neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) and renal function in experimental cirrhosis
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1337 - F1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
M. Pfister, N. E. Martin, L. P. Haskell, and J. S. Barrett
Optimizing Dose Selection with Modeling and Simulation: Application to the Vasopeptidase Inhibitor M100240
J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2004; 44(6): 621 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deddish, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Erdös, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deddish, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Erdös, E. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors