This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Hypertrophy Echocardiography Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery Receptor pharmacology

(Hypertension. 2002;39:903.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass Index in Hypertensive Children

Jonathan M. Sorof; Gina Cardwell; Kathy Franco; Ronald J. Portman

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas-Houston Medical School.

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Sorof, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Texas-Houston, Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, Room 3.124, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail jonathan.m.sorof{at}uth.tmc.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
To determine whether ambulatory blood pressure is more predictive of left ventricular hypertrophy than is casual blood pressure in hypertensive children, echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure data from 37 untreated hypertensive children were analyzed. Left ventricular mass was calculated using the Devereux equation, left ventricular mass index was calculated as left ventricular mass (in grams)/height^2.7 (in meters), and left ventricular hypertrophy was defined as left ventricular mass index >51 g/m^2.7. Average blood pressure, blood pressure load, and blood pressure index (average blood pressure divided by pediatric ambulatory blood pressure 95th percentile) were calculated. Left ventricular mass index was strongly correlated with 24-hour systolic blood pressure index (r=0.43, P=0.008) and was also correlated with 24-hour systolic blood pressure (r=0.34, P=0.037), 24-hour systolic blood pressure load (r=0.38, P=0.020), wake systolic blood pressure load (r=0.37, P=0.025), sleep systolic blood pressure (r=0.33, P=0.048), and sleep systolic blood pressure load (r=0.38, P=0.021). Left ventricular mass index did not correlate with age, weight, clinic blood pressure, or ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. The overall prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 27%. The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 47% (8 of 17) in patients with both systolic blood pressure load >50% and 24-hour systolic blood pressure index >1.0, compared with 10% (2 of 20) in patients without both criteria (P=0.015). These data suggest ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may be useful for the clinical assessment of hypertensive children by identifying those at high risk for the presence of end organ injury.

Key Words: children • blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • hypertrophy, left ventricular • cardiovascular disease • risk factors

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
The most recent update from the Task Force on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents¹ provided population-based 95th percentile blood pressure values in children adjusted for age, gender, and height. These pediatric normative data have guided the interpretation of blood pressure values and provided criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension in children. However, the paucity of data in children linking this statistically based definition of hypertension with evidence of hypertensive end-organ injury has created uncertainty regarding the indications for initiating antihypertensive medication in children whose blood pressure exceeds these threshold values. Because overt morbid cardiovascular events are rare in the majority of hypertensive children, attention has focused on other markers of hypertensive injury, such as increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Studies of normal and hypertensive children have found that systolic blood pressure (SBP) and LVMI are positively associated across a wide range of blood pressure values, with no clear blood pressure threshold to predict pathologically increased LVMI.^2–8 Studies of hypertensive children have reported prevalences of LVH that vary widely.^6–14 Although these data suggest that children with elevated blood pressure do suffer end-organ injury, its prediction using current hypertension definitions remains uncertain.

In hypertensive adults, ambulatory blood pressure parameters are reported to be better correlated with LVMI and more predictive of LVH than are casual blood pressure values.^15–27 Although a previous study of mildly hypertensive children confirmed that ambulatory blood pressure is better correlated with LVMI than is casual blood pressure, neither casual nor ambulatory blood pressure values differentiated patients with and without LVH.¹⁴ To determine the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) variables most closely associated with LVMI and/or predictive of the presence of LVH in hypertensive children, echocardiography and ABPM data from children referred to a pediatric hypertension clinic for evaluation were analyzed.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
The records of children with blood pressure >95th percentile, previously documented by a referring physician and confirmed in pediatric hypertension clinic, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were echocardiography and ABPM for initial diagnostic assessment 3 months apart, no known secondary causes of hypertension, and no antihypertensive medications during ABPM. A comparison group of normotensive children who had echocardiography during the same period for other indications was identified. Inclusion criteria were technically adequate m-mode measurements for LVMI calculation, no history of elevated blood pressure, no previously documented structural cardiac abnormalities, and no current abnormalities other than trivial tricuspid or mitral regurgitation. Indications for echocardiography in the normotensive group included syncope, chest pain, murmurs, arrhythmias, and rule-out of coronary artery aneurysms secondary to Kawasaki’s disease. The study was approved by an institutional review committee.

Left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated from 2D-guided m-mode echocardiographic measurements of the left ventricle. Measurements of the left ventricle internal dimension, interventricular septal thickness, and posterior wall thickness were made during diastole according to methods established by the American Society of Echocardiography. LVM was calculated using the Devereux equation.²⁸ LVMI was calculated by dividing LVM by height^2.7 to minimize effects of age, gender, ethnicity, and overweight status.^29,30 LVH was defined as LVMI >51 g/m^2.7, a value greater than the pediatric 99th percentile that is associated with a 4.1-fold risk of cardiovascular morbidity in hypertensive adults.³¹

ABPM was performed as previously described.³² ABPM data were analyzed by calculating average blood pressure, blood pressure load, and blood pressure index for the entire 24-hour period, wake period, and sleep period. Average blood pressure was calculated by averaging the blood pressure values during the monitoring period. Blood pressure load was calculated as the percentage of each patient’s blood pressure values that exceeded the pediatric ambulatory 95th percentile blood pressure specific for that patient (derived from a study of ABPM values from 1141 healthy children³³). Blood pressure index was calculated by dividing the average blood pressure for each patient by the 95th percentile blood pressure value specific for that patient. Calculated in this manner, a blood pressure index of 1.1 would correspond to blood pressure that was 10% above the 95th percentile, and thus provides an index of the relative severity of blood pressure elevation.³² In addition, blood pressure dipping was calculated by subtracting the average sleep blood pressure from the average wake and dividing the sum by the average wake blood pressure.

Descriptive statistics are presented as percentages, means, and SDs. Univariate analyses for group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using Student’s t test. Multivariate analyses for group comparisons were performed using ANOVA. The correlation between LVMI and continuous demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the strength of association between LVMI and multiple independent variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the LVH percentage between groups. P>0.05 indicated statistical significance.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
Demographic and clinical data for 37 hypertensive patients who underwent echocardiography and ABPM are shown in Table 1. The mean time interval between ABPM and echocardiography was 36±32 days. Ninety-five percent (35 of 37) of the patients had systolic hypertension, and 30% (11 of 37) of the patients had diastolic hypertension. On average, clinic blood pressure values were above the 95th percentile for SBP by 11±10 mm Hg and below the 95th percentile for diastolic blood pressure by 5±9 mm Hg. The group of 37 hypertensive patients was compared with a group of 33 normotensive patients who underwent echocardiography for other indications. LVMI was significantly greater in the hypertensive group than in the normotensive group (41.5±12.0 versus 32.5±8.1, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that LVMI remained significantly higher in the hypertensive group after controlling for differences in gender, age, weight, and height (P=0.023). The prevalence of LVH was 27% (10 of 37) in the hypertensive group and 0% (0 of 33) in the normotensive group (P=0.001).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Characteristics of Hypertensive Patients

The association between echocardiographic and ABPM variables was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. LVMI showed the strongest correlation with ambulatory SBP index (r=0.43, P=0.008) (Figure) among all demographic and clinical variables analyzed. LVMI also showed significant correlations with 24-hour SBP (r=0.34, P=0.037), 24-hour SBP load (r=0.38, P=0.020), wake SBP load (r=0.37, P=0.025), sleep SBP (r=0.33, P=0.048), and sleep SBP load (r=0.38, P=0.021). LVMI did not correlate significantly with age, weight, clinic blood pressure, clinic blood pressure index, or any ambulatory diastolic blood pressure parameters. Interventricular septal thickness showed significant univariate correlations with 24-hour SBP (r=0.43, P=0.008), wake SBP (r=0.44, P=0.007), and sleep SBP (r=0.39, P=0.017). Similarly, left ventricular posterior wall thickness showed significant univariate correlations with 24-hour SBP (r=0.41, P=0.012), wake SBP (r=0.39, P=0.016), and sleep SBP (0.41, P=0.012). Both septal thickness and posterior wall thickness also showed significant univariate correlations with age and weight. Multiple regression analysis controlling for age and weight showed significant correlations between septal thickness and 24-hour SBP (P=0.04) and between septal thickness and wake SBP (P=0.04).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Relationship between ambulatory SBP index and LVMI in hypertensive children. Ambulatory SBP index=average 24-hour SBP/ambulatory pediatric 95th percentile for 24-hour SBP.

Comparisons of demographic and clinical data between patients with and without LVH are shown in Table 2. Patients with and without LVH did not differ in age, gender distribution, height, weight, or body mass index. Patients with LVH had significantly higher 24-hour SBP (P=0.035), sleep SBP (P=0.024), and ambulatory SBP index (P=0.022) compared with those values in patients without LVH and tended to have higher 24-hour SBP load (P=0.080), wake SBP (P=0.058), wake SBP load (P=0.077), and sleep SBP load (P=0.050). Patients with and without LVH did not differ in clinic blood pressure or in any diastolic hemodynamic parameters.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Comparison of Hypertensive Patients With and Without LVH

The prediction of LVH by ABPM parameters was assessed by defining threshold values for blood pressure load and blood pressure index. A higher prevalence of LVH was found when SBP load was >50% (P=0.038) or when ambulatory SBP index was >1.0 (P=0.024). When both SBP load was >50% and ambulatory SBP index was >1.0, the prevalence of LVH was 47% (8 of 17). When both criteria were not met, the prevalence of LVH was 10% (2 of 20, P=0.015). The sensitivity and specificity for this combination of ABPM criteria for predicting LVH were 80% and 67%, respectively.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
One of the most difficult issues in the care of children with elevated casual blood pressure is determining whether to initiate antihypertensive medication. Although the presence of elevated blood pressure in children likely represents a cardiovascular risk factor, blood pressure values of hypertensive children tend to normalize with repeated measurements over time without pharmacological treatment.^34–37 In addition, blood pressure in children is inherently variable as evidenced by the >75% prevalence of white coat hypertension reported in children with persistent mild to moderate casual blood pressure elevation.³² These observations suggest that although casual blood pressure values allow detection of children with elevated blood pressure, they do not allow differentiation between patients who have white coat hypertension, persistent hypertension, or persistent hypertension with target organ injury. Demonstration of LVH by echocardiography in children who have elevated casual blood pressure suggests more strongly the need for pharmacological therapy. The use of echocardiography to evaluate every child with elevated blood pressure, however, is impractical and expensive. The data from the current study show that ABPM may better quantitate the risk of significant LVH than casual blood pressure and thereby be used as a valuable clinical tool in the assessment of hypertensive children.

The results from the current study are consistent with those of previous studies that show positive associations between ambulatory SBP parameters and LVMI in hypertensive children.^14,38 In separate studies of children and young adults with mild blood pressure elevation, LVMI was reported to be positively correlated with ambulatory wake SBP³⁸ and with 24-hour, wake, and sleep SBP.¹⁴ Consistent with these previous studies, the current study found that only ambulatory SBP parameters, and not diastolic blood pressure parameters, were correlated with LVMI. Studies of hypertensive adults have found that blood pressure load is more closely associated with cardiac function than mean blood pressure.²⁴ The current study showed that ambulatory blood pressure index (a measure of relative ambulatory hypertension severity) was more strongly associated with LVMI than casual blood pressure, mean ambulatory blood pressure, or blood pressure load. This finding suggests that ambulatory blood pressure index may be a more robust indicator of the severity of blood pressure elevation over a 24-hour period than is blood pressure load, which describes only the percentage of blood pressure values that are abnormal.

The prevalence of LVH in the current study was 27% in the hypertensive group using the restrictive LVH definition of LVMI >51 g/m^2.7. The absence of LVH in any patient in the normotensive comparison group from the same center provides validation of this relatively high prevalence of LVH in the hypertensive group. Previous studies have reported a prevalence of LVH in hypertensive children that ranges from 10% to 38%,^6–14 depending in part on the method of indexing LVM and the criteria used to define pathologically increased LVMI. In the current study, LVM was calculated by the formula of Devereux²⁸ and indexed to height to the power of 2.7. This approach to indexing is reported to have a high correlation with LVM/lean body mass and minimizes the effect of overweight status on LVMI.^29,30 The threshold of 51 g/m^2.7 to define LVH corresponds to an LVMI greater than the pediatric 99th percentile (ie, severe LVH)³⁹ and is reported to be associated with a 4-fold higher risk for the development of cardiovascular endpoints in hypertensive adults.³¹ The only previous study reporting the prevalence of LVMI >51 g/m^2.7 in hypertensive children found that 8% to 9% of patients (11 of 130) exceeded this threshold.³⁹ This discrepancy may be because the patients in the current study had evidence of more severe hypertension as shown by higher mean clinic SBP values (138.7 versus 135.4 mm Hg), despite being younger (13.5 versus 14.7 years) and shorter (161 versus 166 cm) than patients in the previous study.

The current study clearly demonstrates hypertensive children with LVH have higher ambulatory blood pressure parameters compared with those of children without LVH. These differences persisted even after controlling for age, gender, and weight. In contrast, no differences were found in clinic blood pressure values. These results differ from those of a previous study of mildly hypertensive children in which no differences in ambulatory SBP parameters and lower ambulatory diastolic blood pressure were found in patients with LVH compared with those without LVH.¹⁴ Previous studies of hypertensive adults have reported that 90% of hypertensive adults with a SBP load >50% had LVH compared with <10% of patients with a SBP load <30%.⁴⁰ In the current study, the combined criteria of SBP load threshold of 50% and ambulatory SBP index threshold of 1.0 showed a sensitivity and specificity for LVH of 80% and 67%, respectively. These data suggest that ABPM may predict the presence of LVH in hypertensive children, as has been demonstrated in hypertensive adults.

The current study is limited by several factors. Although the current study is one of the largest to date in children, greater numbers of normotensive and hypertensive patients undergoing both ABPM and echocardiography are needed before the results may be generalized to the overall pediatric population or to the at-risk population of hypertensive children. In addition, there may have been selection bias toward referral of patients to the clinic with more severe or long-standing blood pressure elevation. Thus, the prevalence of LVH in hypertensive children in general is likely to be lower than in this referral-based population. Because the primary aim of the current study was to determine the ambulatory blood pressure parameters that are most closely related to LVMI and predictive of LVH, the study of a more severely affected population of children with an anticipated higher prevalence of LVH is appropriate as an initial approach to the question. Finally, the majority of patients in the current study had systolic hypertension, which may have biased the study results to show a stronger association between SBP and LVMI. However, previous studies have found that the majority of hypertensive children have systolic hypertension, with diastolic hypertension occurring less commonly.⁴¹

	Perspectives

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 
There is little doubt that very young children with extreme blood pressure elevation virtually always require an aggressive approach to their management. However, the changing epidemiology of pediatric hypertension has made these types of patients increasingly less common in the face of a growing epidemic of childhood obesity, inactivity, and poor dietary habits. In a large pediatric hypertension practice, the typical patient demographic is that of an otherwise healthy adolescent with mild to moderate hypertension and some combination of the cardiovascular disease risk factors such of obesity, a family history of hypertension, and an ethnic predisposition to hypertensive disease. In this context, the indications for pharmacological treatment and the target blood pressure values to aim for in response to treatment are unclear based on the current literature. Thus, the practice of evidence-based medicine remains a challenge for physicians who care for hypertensive children. The current study is consistent with studies of adults, showing that ambulatory blood pressure is more closely associated with LVMI and predictive of LVH than is casual blood pressure. In adults, LVH is a potent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and, in children, represents an early stage in the progression of cardiovascular disease. It remains to be determined whether treatment of hypertensive children results in regression of LVMI and resolution of the LVH. If so, this would provide additional evidence that early and aggressive treatment of even mild to moderate hypertension in children is warranted.

	Acknowledgments

 
Research was supported by grant from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K23 HL04217-01A1.

Received December 17, 2001; first decision January 17, 2002; accepted February 6, 2002.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Perspectives References

 

1. Update on the Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Pediatrics. 1996; 1987: 98: 649–658.
2. Malcolm DD, Burns TL, Mahoney LT, Lauer RM. Factors affecting left ventricular mass in childhood: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics. 1993; 92: 703–709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Witt S, Meyer RA. Effect of lean body mass, fat mass, blood pressure, and sexual maturation on left ventricular mass in children and adolescents: statistical, biological, and clinical significance. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3249–3254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Treiber FA, McCaffrey F, Pflieger K, Raunikar RA, Strong WB, Davis H. Determinants of left ventricular mass in normotensive children. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6: 505–513.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Harshfield GA, Koelsch DW, Pulliam DA, Alpert BS, Richey PA, Becker JA. Racial differences in the age-related increase in left ventricular mass in youths. Hypertension. 1994; 24: 747–751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Laird WP, Fixler DE. Left ventricular hypertrophy in adolescents with elevated blood pressure: assessment by chest roentgenography, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Pediatrics. 1981; 67: 255–259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Culpepper WS, Sodt PC, Messerli FH, Ruschhaupt DG, Arcilla RA. Cardiac status in juvenile borderline hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1983; 98: 1–7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Daniels SR, Meyer RA, Loggie JM. Determinants of cardiac involvement in children and adolescents with essential hypertension. Circulation. 1990; 82: 1243–1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Goldring D, Hernandez A, Choi S, Lee JY, Londe S, Lindgren FT, Burton RM. Blood pressure in a high school population, II: clinical profile of the juvenile hypertensive. J Pediatr. 1979; 95: 298–304.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Culpepper WS. Cardiac anatomy and function in juvenile hypertension: current understanding and future concerns. Am J Med. 1983; 75: 57–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Schieken RM, Clarke WR, Lauer RM. Left ventricular hypertrophy in children with blood pressures in the upper quintile of the distribution: the Muscatine Study. Hypertension. 1981; 3: 669–675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Richter R. Echokardiographische Untersuchungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit primarer Hypertonie. Kinderarztl Prax. 1993; 61: 279–284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Johnson MC, Bergersen LJ, Beck A, Dick G, Cole BR. Diastolic function and tachycardia in hypertensive children. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 1009–1014.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Belsha CW, Wells TG, McNiece KL, Seib PM, Plummer JK, Berry PL. Influence of diurnal blood pressure variations on target organ abnormalities in adolescents with mild essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998; 11: 410–417.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Mansoor GA, White WB. Contribution of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to the design and analysis of antihypertensive therapy trials. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1994; 1: 136–142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Staessen JA, O’Brien ET, Amery AK, Atkins N, Baumgart P, De Cort P, Degaute JP, Dolenc P, De Gaudemaris R, Enstrom I. Ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects: results from an international database. J Hypertens. 1994; 12 (suppl): S1–S12.
17. Modesti PA, Pieri F, Cecioni I, Valenti R, Mininni S, Toccafondi S, Vocioni F, Salvati G, Gensini GF, Neri Serneri GG. Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and conventional office measurement in the workers of a chemical company. Int J Cardiol. 1994; 46: 151–157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Mancia G, Frattola A, Groppelli A, Omboni S, Parati G, Ulian L, Villani A. Blood pressure reduction and end-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1994; 12 (suppl): S35–S41.
19. Siche JP, Schwebel C, Longere P, Tremel F, De Gaudemaris R, Comparat V, Mallion JM. Hypertrophie ventriculaire gauche et variabilite de la pression arterielle au repos et en ambulatoire chez l’hypertendu. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994; 87: 1005–1009.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Pai PY, Chou HT, Tsou SS, Wang TF. The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in untreated mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients: correlation with echocardiography. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei). 1994; 54: 93–99.
21. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan RM, Juster RP. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure measurements: further analyses. J Hypertens. 1989; 7 (suppl): S3–S10.[CrossRef]
22. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Guerrieri M, Gatteschi C, Benemio G, Boldrini F, Porcellati C. Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1990; 81: 528–536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. White WB, Schulman P, McCabe EJ, Dey HM. Average daily blood pressure, not office blood pressure, determines cardiac function in patients with hypertension. JAMA. 1989; 261: 873–877.[Abstract]
24. White WB, Dey HM, Schulman P. Assessment of the daily blood pressure load as a determinant of cardiac function in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Am Heart J. 1989; 118: 782–795.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, Malaspina D, Mancia G. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1987; 5: 93–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Antonicelli R, Partemi M, Spazzafumo L, Amadio L, Paciaroni E. Blood pressure self-measurement in the elderly: differences between automatic and semi-automatic systems. J Hum Hypertens. 1995; 9: 229–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Redon J, Campos C, Narciso ML, Rodicio JL, Pascual JM, Ruilope LM. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 712–718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 450–458.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Meyer RA. Indexing left ventricular mass to account for differences in body size in children and adolescents without cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 76: 699–701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, Meyer RA, Roman MJ, de Divitiis O, Alderman MH. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1251–1260.[Abstract]
31. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Koren MJ, Meyer RA, Laragh JH. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1056–1062.[Abstract]
32. Sorof JM, Poffenbarger T, Franco K, Portman R. Evaluation of white coat hypertension in children: importance of the definitions of normal ambulatory blood pressure and the severity of casual hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 855–860.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Soergel M, Kirschstein M, Busch C, Danne T, Gellermann J, Holl R, Krull F, Reichert H, Reusz GS, Rascher W. Oscillometric twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure values in healthy children and adolescents: a multicenter trial including 1141 subjects. J Pediatr. 1997; 130: 178–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Fixler DE, Laird WP, Fitzgerald V, Stead S, Adams R. Hypertension screening in schools: results of the Dallas study. Pediatrics. 1979; 63: 32–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Sinaiko AR, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ. Prevalence of "significant" hypertension in junior high school-aged children: the Children and Adolescent Blood Pressure Program. J Pediatr. 1989; 114: 664–669.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Berenson GS, Shear CL, Chiang YK, Webber LS, Voors AW. Combined low-dose medication and primary intervention over a 30-month period for sustained high blood pressure in childhood. Am J Med Sci. 1990; 299: 79–86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Sorof JM, Cargo P, Graepel J, King E, Rolf C, Humphrey D, Cunningham RJ, The Ziac Pediatric Hypertension Study Group. ß-Blocker/thiazide combination for treatment of hypertensive children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Nephrol. In press.
38. Chamontin B, Amar J, Barthe P, Salvador M. Blood pressure measurements and left ventricular mass in young adults with arterial hypertension screened at high school check-up. J Hum Hypertens. 1994; 8: 357–361.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Daniels SR, Loggie JM, Khoury P, Kimball TR. Left ventricular geometry and severe left ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents with essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1907–1911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. White WB. Hypertensive target organ involvement and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement.In: Waeber B, O’Brien E, O’Malley K, Brunner H, eds. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. New York: Raven, 1994: 47–60.
41. Sorof JM. Systolic hypertension in children: benign or beware? Pediatr Nephrol. 2001; 16: 517–525.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M Franks, C. E O'Brien, C. D Stowe, T. G Wells, and S. F Gardner Candesartan Cilexetil Effectively Reduces Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Children Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2008; 42(10): 1388 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Urbina, B. Alpert, J. Flynn, L. Hayman, G. A. Harshfield, M. Jacobson, L. Mahoney, B. McCrindle, M. Mietus-Snyder, J. Steinberger, et al. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Recommendations for Standard Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 433 - 451. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Foster, A. S. Mackie, M. Mitsnefes, H. Ali, S. Mamber, and S. D. Colan A Novel Method of Expressing Left Ventricular Mass Relative to Body Size in Children Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2769 - 2775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. McNiece, M. Gupta-Malhotra, J. Samuels, C. Bell, K. Garcia, T. Poffenbarger, J. M. Sorof, and R. J. Portman Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Adolescents: Analysis of Risk by 2004 National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group Staging Criteria Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 392 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Mitchell, N. Cheung, K. de Haseth, B. Taylor, E. Rochtchina, F. M. A. Islam, J. J. Wang, S. M. Saw, and T. Y. Wong Blood Pressure and Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing in Children Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1156 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Lande, N. L. Carson, J. Roy, and C. C. Meagher Effects of Childhood Primary Hypertension on Carotid Intima Media Thickness: A Matched Controlled Study Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Mitsnefes, T. R. Kimball, S. A. Witt, B. J. Glascock, P. R. Khoury, and S. R. Daniels Abnormal Carotid Artery Structure and Function in Children and Adolescents With Successful Renal Transplantation Circulation, July 6, 2004; 110(1): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hanevold, J. Waller, S. Daniels, R. Portman, and J. Sorof The Effects of Obesity, Gender, and Ethnic Group on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Geometry in Hypertensive Children: A Collaborative Study of the International Pediatric Hypertension Association Pediatrics, February 1, 2004; 113(2): 328 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Sorof, J. Turner, D. S. Martin, K. Garcia, Z. Garami, A. V. Alexandrov, F. Wan, and R. J. Portman Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Sequelae in Hypertensive Children Identified by Referral Versus School-Based Screening Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 214 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Flynn Ethics of Placebo Use in Pediatric Clinical Trials: The Case of Antihypertensive Drug Studies Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 865 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Hypertrophy Echocardiography Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery Receptor pharmacology