(Hypertension. 2002;39:923.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery (A.M.M., J.B., J.D.), Clinical Chemistry (N.V.), and Internal Medicine (O.B.), University Clinic of Navarra, University of Navarra, and the Division of Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, School of Medicine (J.D.), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Correspondence to Dr Javier Díez, División de Fisiopatología Cardiovascular, Facultad de Medicina, C/Irunlarrea s/n, 31008 Pamplona, Spain. E-mail jadimar{at}unav.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: collagen hypertension, essential fibrosis peptides ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have used serological markers of collagen turnover to address myocardial fibrosis of rats with spontaneous hypertension (SHR)68 and patients with essential hypertension912 and LVH. Serum concentrations of the carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (PIP), a marker of collagen type I synthesis, were higher in each setting of hypertensive heart disease, and there was a direct correlation between histological evidence and quantity of myocardial fibrosis and serum PIP concentration in SHR and hypertensive patients. Furthermore, in a recent study12 we showed that hypertensives with serum concentrations of PIP >127 µg/L have an almost 5-fold higher probability of presenting with histologically proven severe myocardial fibrosis than do hypertensives with serum PIP below this value. Thus, this cutoff value of PIP can be used to separate hypertensives likely presenting with severe myocardial fibrosis from subjects with nonsevere fibrosis.13
Quantitative characterization of myocardial texture by analysis of ultrasonic reflectivity has been experimentally1417 and clinically18,19 shown to correlate with the collagen content of the myocardial tissue. We thus have hypothesized that PIP serum concentrations above 127 µg/L should be associated with alterations in myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity detected by backscatter analysis. To test our hypothesis, maximal intensity (MI) and cyclic variation (CV) of backscatter signal were analyzed in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients classified according to their serum concentrations of PIP.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients had appropriate clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations to exclude secondary hypertension and cardiac disease different from hypertensive heart disease. None of the subjects exhibited clinical manifestations suggestive of heart failure. Conditions associated with alterations in serum levels of PIP (alcoholic liver disease, metabolic bone disease, hyperthyroidism) were excluded after complete medical examination in all subjects.
Determination of PIP
Serum samples for PIP determination were withdrawn at the time of the clinical studies and stored at -40°C for up to 6 months. Serum PIP was determined by radioimmunoassay according to a method previously described.9 The interassay and intra-assay variations for determining PIP were 7% and 3%, respectively. The sensitivity (lower detection limit) was 1.20 µg/L.
Assessment of Left Ventricular Anatomy and Function
Two-dimensional, targeted M-mode and Doppler ultrasound recordings were obtained in each patient as described previously.11,12 Left ventricular mass and interventricular septal thickness (IVST) were measured, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated by dividing left ventricular mass by body surface area. The following pulsed Doppler measurements were obtained: maximal early transmitral velocity in diastole (VE), maximal late transmitral velocity in diastole (VA), A-wave deceleration time (DT), and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT). Left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated according to Quinones et al.20
LVH was considered to be present when LVMI was higher than 116 g/m2 in men and 104 g/m2 in women and/or IVST >11 mm.21 Diastolic dysfunction was defined as alterations in VE:VA ratio and/or IVRT and/or DT according to García et al.22
Analysis of Backscatter Signal
To perform the backscatter tissue characterization, a SONOS 5500 ultrasound system (Philips) with backscatter software was used. Six regions of interest were chosen throughout the left ventricular myocardium in the following views: mid-septum and mid-posterior wall in the parasternal long axis view, middle portion of the anterior, lateral, and inferior walls in the parasternal short axis view and apex in the apical 4-chamber view. In each region backscatter images were acquired in continuous loop review format and an independent expert, blinded to the group of pertinence, made the signal analysis off-line. Thus, for each region a time-dependent curve was obtained from which MI and CV were calculated as described elsewhere.19 For covariates in the statistical analysis, time-gain compensation and depth were also measured in each region.
Statistical Analysis
For the statistical analysis, the 10.0 version of SPSS software (SPSS, Inc) was used. All the quantitative variables were tested for Gaussian distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; all of them followed this distribution and are presented as mean±SD.
A repeated-measures mixed factorial design, with myocardial region as intrasubject factor and group of pertinence as intersubject factor, was used. The statistical analysis employed was a 3-way ANOVA (criteria: subjects, group of pertinence, and myocardial segments). Age, sex, intersubject heterogeneity of the signal, LVMI, and echocardiographic time-gain compensation and depth were included as covariates in the analyses. The Bonferroni post-hoc test was used whenever a difference was statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves allowed determination of the overall performance of conventional echocardiographic and backscatter measurements for predicting PIP >127 µg/L in the studied subjects.23 In all cases a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical parameters evaluated in the 3 groups are presented in Table 1. As expected, values of blood pressure were significantly higher in hypertensives from groups 2 and 3 than in normotensives from group 1. No significant differences in blood pressure were found between the 2 groups of patients. As expected, PIP was significantly higher in hypertensives from group 3 than in the other 2 groups of subjects.
|
Left Ventricular Anatomy and Function
Table 2 shows the echocardiographic parameters assessing left ventricular anatomy and function. The prevalence of LVH was significantly higher in the 2 groups of hypertensives than in the group of normotensives. Similarly, the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction was higher in the 2 groups of hypertensive patients than in the group of normotensive subjects. Furthermore, diastolic dysfunction was more frequent in hypertensives from group 3 than in hypertensives from group 2. None of the subjects studied exhibited systolic dysfunction, as assessed by an EF below 40%.
|
Backscatter Signal
When we analyzed the CV, time-gain compensation was the only covariate that had a significant impact (P<0.05) and remained in the analysis. CV varied (P<0.001) throughout the myocardial regions, the maximal value being obtained in the inferior and posterior walls and the minimum in the apex in the 3 groups.
As shown in Figure 1, CV was diminished (P<0.05) in hypertensives from group 3 (4.70±0.33 dB, range 4.00 to 5.29 dB) compared with normotensives from group 1 (5.78±0.25 dB, range 5.30 to 6.20 dB). This difference remained significant for all the regions studied (Figure 2). No differences in CV were observed between hypertensives from group 2 (5.10±0.27 dB, range 4.50 to 5.60 dB) and the 2 other groups of subjects.
|
|
Regarding MI, the only covariate with a significant impact was, again, time-gain compensation (P<0.001), and this was confirmed in the analysis. MI also varied (P<0.001) among all the myocardial regions in both groups, because it was higher in apex and the anterior wall and lower in the lateral wall. We did not find significant differences in MI among groups, either for global (Figure 3) or regional values (data not shown).
|
ROC Analysis
The ROC curves assessed the overall performance of conventional and backscatter echocardiographic parameters for predicting values of PIP >127 µg/L. The apical region was chosen to calculate the ROC curve for 2 reasons: (1) backscatter analysis of this region seems to be more accurate because it is not so influenced by attenuation and systolic movement of the heart, and (2) the highest area under the ROC curve was obtained in this region.
The area under the ROC curve was larger (P<0.05) for CV than for the remaining parameters assessed. In addition, only the area under the ROC curve for CV was higher (P<0.05) than 0.50 (Figure 4).
|
The cutoff values of reference for the different parameters tested were calculated (Table 3) according to the ROC curve. The sensitivity and specificity of each of these values for predicting PIP >127 µg/L are presented in Table 3. Overall, the cutoff value of CV in the apex showed the best sensitivity and specificity. Thus, the relative risk of presenting PIP >127 µg/L was much higher for hypertensives with CV values in the apex below 2.90 dB than for hypertensives with deviations of the cutoff values for the other parameters.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several echocardiographic approaches have been used to quantitatively define changes in myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity, among them analysis of the backscatter signal. This signal is produced when the ultrasound interacts with components of the tissue smaller than its wavelength, the reflected signal is scattered, and a part of it (ie, backscatter) is directed toward the probe. Time-domain analysis of this radio frequency signal provides 2 main variables: its maximal intensity or MI and the systolic to diastolic cyclic variation of the intensity or CV. Whereas no significant changes were found in this study in MI, CV was seen to be altered in a group of hypertensive patients characterized by increased serum concentrations of PIP and a high prevalence of LVH. In fact, values of CV measured in hypertensives with PIP above 127 µg/L were below the interval of normal values measured in this study and reported in the literature.24,25 Several other investigators, using alternative methods, have confirmed the presence of diminished cardiac cycle-dependent variation of backscatter in the hypertrophied myocardium of hypertensive patients.2628
The rate of extracellular synthesis of collagen type I can be assessed by measuring the serum concentration of PIP, which is freed during the extracellular processing of procollagen type I before collagen molecules form fibers.29 A number of observations have led to the proposal that increased production of PIP is a useful marker of stimulated fibrogenesis in arterial hypertension.13 Furthermore, we have shown recently that a serum concentration of PIP above 127 µg/L is a highly sensitive and specific parameter in the identification of biopsy-proven severe myocardial fibrosis in patients with essential hypertension.11,12 Thus, our finding of decreased CV in hypertensives with elevated PIP would suggest that this ultrasonic abnormality is likely associated with severe myocardial fibrosis in these patients. This possibility is in agreement with previous findings by Ciulla et al26 showing that, in hypertensive patients with LVH and histologically assessed myocardial fibrosis, echo amplitude during cardiac cycle is abnormally diminished.
Because myocardial fibrosis is highly frequent and adversely affects the clinical outcome of hypertensives,5 development of noninvasive tools for its monitoring may play a relevant role in the clinical handling of these patients. In this conceptual framework, some findings reported here may be of interest. First, as shown by the ROC curve analysis, CV in the apex is a highly sensitive and specific parameter in the identification of elevated PIP in hypertension. Second, hypertensives with CV <2.90 dB in the apex have a 2.5-fold higher probability of presenting with elevated PIP than do hypertensives with CV below this value. Third, CV in the apex has the highest performance for estimating elevated PIP when tested against the standard echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular anatomy and function. Therefore, the determination of both CV and PIP may be useful for screening for severe myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients.
The mechanism for the reduction in CV of backscatter in hearts from hypertensives with PIP above 127 µg/L is not yet clear. Wickline et al30 showed previously that subepicardial regions in myocardium from open-chest dogs exhibit reduced cyclic variation that parallels their contractile performance. Furthermore, quantitative differences in CV observed among the different myocardial regions have been found to be associated with corresponding regional differences in contractile performance.31 Thus, it is possible that reduced systolic function in hypertensive patients with PIP above 127 µg/L is in part responsible for the observed reduction in CV. The role of myocardial fibrosis in this patient population can be considered as determinant of this functional abnormality. In fact, as proposed by Weber et al,32 whereas a moderate increase in collagen content adversely influences diastolic stiffness of the myocardium and facilitates diastolic dysfunction, a more severe accumulation of collagen fibers is associated with a further rise in diastolic stiffness and a decline in myocardial elastance during contraction, thus leading to systolic dysfunction.
This possibility is in apparent discrepancy with the finding that both subendocardial fractional shortening and ejection fraction were normal in hypertensives with PIP above 127 µg/L. However, it is now accepted that these 2 measures overestimate left ventricular systolic function in most patients with hypertension.33 Other measures provide a different impression of the integrity of systolic performance in hypertensives. For instance, midwall shortening has been demonstrated to be impaired in hypertensive patients with normal or greater-than-normal ejection fraction.34 Thus, assessment of midwall shortening may be useful in detecting compromised systolic function, especially in hypertensives with severe myocardial fibrosis and diminished CV.
Limitations of the Study
Some limitations of the study should be acknowledged. First, it was performed on a limited number of hypertensives. Furthermore, the majority of our patients were under antihypertensive treatment; even though the treatment was inadequate in terms of blood pressure control for all patients, it may have influenced the main parameters analyzed.
Second, the specific method of ultrasonic tissue characterization employed here may present some limitations linked to the adjustment of the signal in particular regions of the myocardium.35 To avoid these problems, we have adjusted the values obtained to local gain and depth in every myocardial region analyzed.
Finally, it is clear that PIP detectable in serum is not exclusively heart-specific. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated that noncardiac sources of elevated serum PIP can be excluded in hypertensive patients with increased serum concentration of the peptide.11,12 In addition, we have shown that changes in the cardiac compartment of collagen type I alter concentrations of PIP in the circulation of SHR.69
Perspectives
The present study demonstrates that cardiac cycle-dependent variation of backscatter signal is abnormally diminished in hypertensive patients with increased serum concentrations of a marker of severe myocardial fibrosis. Furthermore, the association of PIP above 127 µg/L with CV in the apex below 2.90 dB predicts with great accuracy the presence of severe myocardial fibrosis in arterial hypertension. Thus, the combination of these 2 alterations may be useful for the noninvasive assessment of cardiac fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. They also set the stage for monitoring this disease in response to pharmacological intervention. Nevertheless, because of the limitations of this investigation, we are aware that further larger studies are necessary to definitively validate this approach.
Received December 17, 2001; first decision February 1, 2002; accepted February 21, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Brilla CG, Matsubara L, Weber KT. Advanced hypertensive heart disease in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 269275.
3.
Schwartzkopff B, Motz W, Frenzel H, Vogt M, Knauer S, Strauer BE. Structural and functional alterations of the intramyocardial coronary arterioles in patients with arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1993; 88: 9931003.
4. Pearlman ES, Weber KT, Janicki JS, Pietra GG, Fishman AP. Muscle fiber orientation and connective tissue content in the hypertrophied human heart. Lab Invest. 1982; 46: 158164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Díez J, López B, González A, Querejeta R. Clinical aspects of hypertensive myocardial fibrosis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001; 16: 328335.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Díez J, Panizo A, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Hernandez M, Pardo-Mindan J. Serum markers of collagen type I metabolism in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Relation to myocardial fibrosis. Circulation. 1996; 93: 10261032.
7. Varo N, Etayo JC, Zalba G, Beaumont J, Iraburu MJ, Montiel C, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Díez J. Losartan inhibits the post-transcriptional synthesis of collagen type I and reverses left ventricular fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 107114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Varo N, Iraburu MJ, Varela M, López B, Etayo JC, Díez J. Chronic AT1 blockade stimulates extracellular collagen type I degradation and reverses myocardial fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 11971202.
9.
Díez J, Laviades C, Mayor G, Gil MJ, Monreal I. Increased serum concentrations of procollagen peptides in essential hypertension. Relation to cardiac alterations. Circulation. 1995; 91: 14501456.
10. Laviades C, Varo N, Fernández J, Mayor G, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Díez J. Abnormalities of the extracellular degradation of collagen type I in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998; 8: 535540.
11.
Querejeta R, Varo N, López B, Larman M, Artiñano E, Etayo JC, Martínez Ubago JL, Gutierrez-Stampa M, Emparanza JI, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Pardo Mindán J, Díez J. Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I is a marker of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 101: 17291735.
12.
López B, Querejeta R, Varo N, González A, Larman M, Martínez Ubago JL, Díez J. Usefulness of serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I in assessment of the cardioreparative ability of antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2001; 104: 286291.
13.
López B, González A, Varo N, Laviades C, Querejeta R, Díez J. Biochemical assessment of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 12221226.
14. Mimbs JW, ODonnell M, Bauwens D, Miller JG, Sobel BE. The dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter on collagen content in dog and rabbit hearts. Circ Res. 1980; 47: 4858.
15. Pérez JE, Barzilai B, Madaras EI, Glueck RM, Saffitz JE, Johnston P, Miller JG, Sobel BE. Applicability of ultrasonic tissue characterization for longitudinal assessment and differentiation of calcification and fibrosis in cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4: 8895.[Abstract]
16. ODonnell M, Mimbs JW, Miller JG. The relationship between collagen and ultrasonic backscatter in myocardial tissue. J Acoust Soc Am. 198; 69: 580588.
17.
Hoyt RM, Skorton DJ, Collins SM, Melton HE. Ultrasonic backscatter and collagen in normal ventricular myocardium. Circulation. 1984; 69: 775782.
18.
Picano E, Pelosi G, Marzilli M, Lattanzi F, Benassi A, Landini L, LAbbate A. In vivo quantitative ultrasonic evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in humans. Circulation. 1990; 81: 5864.
19.
Vered Z, Barzilai B, Mohr GA, Thomas LJIII, Genton R, Sobel BE, Shoup TA, Melton HE, Miller JG, Pérz JE. Quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization with real-time integrated backscatter imaging in normal human subjects and in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1987; 76: 10671073.
20. Quinones MA, Pickering E, Alexander JK. Percentage of shortening of the echocardiographic left ventricular dimension: its use in determining ejection fraction and stroke volume. Chest. 1987; 74: 5965.
21. Devereux RB, Dahlöf B, Levy D, Pfeffer MA. Comparison of enalapril versus nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (the PRESERVE trial). Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 6165.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 865875.
23.
McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making. 1984; 4: 137150.
24.
Masuyama T, St Goar FG, Tye TL, Oppenheim G, Schnittger I, Popp RL. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of human hypertrophied hearts in vivo with cardiac cycle-dependent variation in integrated backscatter. Circulation. 1989; 80: 925934.
25. Madaras EI, Perez J, Sobel BE, Mottley JG, Miller JG. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: II. Measurements in vivo. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 83: 762769.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ciulla M, Paliotti R, Hess DB, Tjahja E, Campbell SE, Magrini F, Weber KT. Echocardiographic patterns of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients: endomyocardial biopsy versus ultrasonic tissue characterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10: 657664.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Di Bello VD, Pedrinelli R, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Talini E, Caputo MT, DellOlomo G, Cioppi A, Moretti L, Paterni M, Giusti C. The potential prognostic value of ultrasonic characterization (videodensitometry) of myocardial tissue in essential hypertension. Coron Artery Dis. 2000; 11: 513521.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Di Bello V, Pedrinelli R, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Caputo MT, Cioppi A, Talini E, Leonardo M, DellOlmo G, Paterni M, Giusti C. Microalbuminuria, pulse pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, and myocardial ultrasonic tissue characterization in essential hypertension. Angiology. 2000; 52: 175183.
29.
Miyahara M, Nijeha FK, Prockop DJ. Formation of collagen fibrils in vitro by cleavage of procollagen with procollagen proteinases. J Biol Chem. 1982; 257: 84428448.
30. Wickline SA, Thomas LJIII, Miller JG, Sobel BE, Pérez JE. The dependence of myocardial ultrasonic backscatter on contractile performance. Circulation. 1985; 72: 189194.
31.
Haendchen RV, Wyatt HL, Maurer G, Zwehl W, Baer M, Meerbaum S, Corday E. Quantitation of regional function by two-dimensional echocardiography. I. Patterns of contraction in the normal left ventricle. Circulation. 1983; 67: 12341240.
32.
Weber KT, Brilla CG, Janicki JS. Myocardial fibrosis: functional significance and regulatory factors. Cardiovasc Res. 1993; 27: 341348.
33.
Hartford M, Wikstrand JC, Wallentin I, Ljungman SM, Berglund GL. Left ventricular wall stress and systolic function in untreated primary hypertension. Hypertension. 1985; 7: 97104.
34.
De Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, Mensah GA, Casale PN, Laragh JH. Midwall left ventricular mechanics. An independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1996; 93: 259265.
35. Perez JE, Barzilai B, Wickline SA, Vered Z, Sobel BE, Miller JG. Quantitative characterization of myocardium with ultrasonic imaging. J Nucl Med Allied Sci. 1988; 32: 149157.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Gonzalez, B. Lopez, S. Ravassa, J. Beaumont, T. Arias, N. Hermida, A. Zudaire, and J. Diez Biochemical markers of myocardial remodelling in hypertensive heart disease Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2009; 81(3): 509 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Umar, J. J. Bax, M. Klok, R. J. van Bommel, M. H.M. Hessel, B. den Adel, G. B. Bleeker, M. M. Henneman, D. E. Atsma, E. E. van der Wall, et al. Myocardial collagen metabolism in failing hearts before and during cardiac resynchronization therapy Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 878 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Salvetti, M. L. Muiesan, A. Paini, C. Monteduro, B. Bonzi, G. Galbassini, E. Belotti, E. Movilli, G. Cancarini, and E. Agabiti-Rosei Myocardial Ultrasound Tissue Characterization in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1953 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohtsuka, K. Inoue, Y. Hara, N. Morioka, K. Ohshima, J. Suzuki, A. Ogimoto, Y. Shigematsu, and J. Higaki Serum markers of angiogenesis and myocardial ultrasonic tissue characterization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 689 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Ciulla, R. Paliotti, A. Esposito, J. Diez, B. Lopez, B. Dahlof, M. G. Nicholls, R. D. Smith, L. Gilles, F. Magrini, et al. Different Effects of Antihypertensive Therapies Based on Losartan or Atenolol on Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Fibrosis: Results of a Randomized Trial Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 552 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Di Bello, D. Giorgi, E. Talini, G. Dell' Omo, C. Palagi, M. F. Romano, R. Pedrinelli, and M. Mariani Incremental Value of Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization (Backscatter) in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Structure and Mechanics in Essential Arterial Hypertension Circulation, January 7, 2003; 107(1): 74 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Maceira, J. Barba, O. Beloqui, and J. Diez Ultrasonic Backscatter and Diastolic Function in Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 239 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |