| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2002;40:41.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the CNR, Centre of Clinical Physiology and Division of Nephrology (C.Z., F.M., G.T., S.P., S.C.), Reggio Calabria, Italy; Cardiology Unit, Morelli Hospital (F.A.B.), Reggio Calabria, Italy; and Institute of Internal Medicine and Nephrology "L. Condorelli," Catania University (A.C., L.S.M.), Italy.
Correspondence to Prof Carmine Zoccali, Director, Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e, Divisione di Nefrologia, Via Sbarre Inferiori 39, 89131 Reggio Calabria, Italy. E-mail carmine.zoccali{at}tin.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.001) of other cardiovascular risk factors, and in these models, plasma NE ranked as the second correlate of MWT and RWT. Similarly, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the association of plasma NE with concentric LVH was strong and again independent of other risk factors (P=0.003). Plasma NE is associated to concentric LVH in ESRD patients. These observations constitute a sound basis for testing the effect of anti-adrenergic drugs on left ventricle mass and on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ESRD.
Key Words: cardiovascular risk dialysis left ventricular hypertrophy norepinephrine renal failure sympathetic activity uremia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a large cohort of dialysis patients, we have recently observed that raised plasma NE is a strong and independent predictor of incident cardiovascular events.9 Giving the importance of this sympathetic neurotransmitter in mechanisms regulating myocardial trophism and plasticity10 alterations in LVM may well represent a mechanism whereby NE contributes to the high rate of cardiovascular events in ESRD. Although modification of adrenergic activity in an intervention study remains the ultimate test for the hypothesis that high plasma NE is involved in LVH and cardiovascular complication in ESRD, studying the relationship between plasma NE and LVM and geometry may provide useful information for clarifying the issue. In the present study, we have therefore undertaken a detailed analysis of this relationship in patients who took part into the above-mentioned follow-up study.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Cohort
One hundred and ninety-seven hemodialysis patients (110 men and 87 women) with ESRD who had been on regular dialysis treatment for at least 6 months (median duration of regular dialysis treatment, 43 months; interquartile range, 20 to 110 months) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35% and without clinical evidence of heart failure (defined as dyspnea in addition to 2 of the following conditions: raised jugular pressure, bibasilar crackles, pulmonary venous hypertension or interstitial edema on chest X-ray requiring hospitalization or extra ultrafiltration) were considered eligible for the study. All patients were virtually anuric (diuresis <200 mL/day).
Patients were being treated 3 times weekly with standard bicarbonate dialysis (in mmol/L: Na 138, HCO3 35, K 1.5, Ca 1.25, and Mg 0.75) or by high-flux hemodialysis using 1.1 to 1.7 m2 dialyzers either with cuprophan or semisynthetic membranes. Dry weight was targeted in each case to achieve a normotensive edema-free state. Seventy-seven patients were habitual smokers (22±16 cigarettes/ day). One hundred and nine patients were on treatment with erythropoietin. The demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of the patients are detailed in Table 1.
|
Laboratory Measurements
Blood sampling was performed during a midweek nondialysis day after 20 to 30 minutes of quiet resting in semirecumbent position. Samples were taken into prechilled EDTA vacutainers, placed immediately on ice, and centrifuged within 30 minutes at 4°C. The plasma stored at -80°C until analyses.
Serum lipids, albumin, calcium, phosphate, and hemoglobin measurements were made using standard methods in the routine clinical laboratory. C-reactive protein levels were measured by a commercially available kit (Behring, Scoppito). Plasma homocysteine was quantified by a high-performance liquid chromatography method.11
The plasma concentration of NE was measured by a commercially available radioimmunoassay kit (Amicyl-test, Immunological Laboratories). The intraassay coefficient of variation was 7% to 15%. The upper limit of the normal range of plasma NE in our laboratory is 3.54 nmol/L, which is very close to the value (3.38 nmol/L) reported in a previous study.12
Blood Pressure Measurements
Blood pressure was estimated by averaging all predialysis arterial pressure recordings during the month before the study (total of 12 measurements, ie, 3/wk).13
Echocardiography
These studies were performed during the dialysis interval within 2 hours after blood sampling. LVM was calculated according to the Devereux cube formula and indexed to height2.7 (LVMI).14 LVH was defined by a LVMI of >47 g/m2.7 in women or >50 g/m2.7 in men. The height-based indexing of LVM was specifically chosen to minimize any potential distortion attributable to extracellular volume expansion (surface area indexing being weight-sensitive).15 The relative wall thickness [RWT, 2xposterior wall thickness/left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD)] was also calculated, as an index of the left ventricular geometric pattern. Values indicative of concentric and eccentric left ventricular geometry were established on the basis of age-specific reference standards.16 Mean wall thickness (MWT) was calculated by the standard formula: MWT=[(interventricular septum+posterior wall thickness)/2].
Statistical Analyses
Data are reported as mean±SD, median and interquartile range or as percentage frequency, and comparisons between groups were made by 1-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, or
2 test, as appropriate. Variables that did not show a Gaussian distribution were log-transformed before further analyses (log10).
To test the independent relationship between plasma NE and the indicators of the muscular component of the left ventricle (MWT and RWT), we constructed multivariate models (either multiple linear or logistic regression analysis) based on plasma NE (expressed in tertiles) and on a series of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors in dialysis patients (age, sex, diabetes, previous cardiovascular events, smoking, systolic pressure, serum cholesterol, plasma homocysteine, serum calcium and phosphate, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin, hemoglobin, and fractional urea clearance [Kt/V]) as well as on the use of sympathicolytic agents or ß-blockers, calcium antagonists, and ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Significant independent variables were identified by a stepwise approach. Furthermore, to control for the potential confounding effect of covariates that differed in the 3 tertiles of plasma NE, we always forced such covariates (P
0.20) into the final models. By this approach, we constructed models of adequate statistical power (at least 15 subjects for each variable in the final model). Data are expressed as regression coefficient (ß) or as odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI), as appropriate. All calculations were done using a standard statistical package (SPSS, version 9.0.1).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As shown in Table 1 patients in the third NE tertile were older, had a greater prevalence of males and higher heart rate in comparison with those in the second and the first NE tertile. Fractional urea clearance (Kt/V) was very similar in the 3 groups. The proportion of patients on antihypertensive treatment (including sympathicolytic agents or ß-blockers) did not differ in the 3 groups. MWT was significantly higher in the third NE tertile than in the other 2 tertiles (P=0.001), and such an increase was paralleled by a rise in RWT (P=0.006). Because LVEDD was similar in the 3 NE tertiles (P=0.77), the difference in LVMI failed to achieve statistical significance (P=0.11). According to the findings that MWT and RWT increase in parallel in patients with high NE (while LVEDD remains unchanged), left ventricular concentric hypertrophy was more prevalent in patients in the third NE tertile (46%) than in the second (38%) and first (25%) NE tertiles.
Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed that the association of plasma NE with the muscular component of left ventricle (MWT) and with RWT was independent of others cardiovascular risk factors and of antihypertensive treatment (Table 2). Indeed, in these analyses, plasma NE ranked as the second correlate of these echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular geometry. By the same token, multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the association of plasma NE with concentric hypertrophy was strong and again independent of other risk factors (Table 3). In this model patients in the third tertile of plasma NE had an odds ratio for concentric hypertrophy that was 3.81 (95% CI, 1.56 to 9.27) times higher than in those in the first tertile (P=0.003).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NE and Sympathetic Activity in ESRD
Plasma NE in ESRD patients was found to be high in most studies performed between the 1970s and 1980s,1725 and on the basis of these studies, chronic renal failure was considered a situation characterized by enhanced sympathetic activity. The interpretation of plasma NE as a marker of sympathetic activity is complex in patients with renal failure because circulating NE represents only a small proportion of the neurotransmitter amount secreted from adrenergic nerve terminals26 and because these patients display metabolic alterations that may alter the plasma concentration of this substance. Measurements of plasma NE in no way can be considered a substitute to sympathetic microneurography, which is the undisputed standard for the assessment of sympathetic activity. This technique has convincingly demonstrated that sympathetic activity in dialysis patients is increased6 and that this increase is even more consistent than it emerged from early studies based on plasma NE measurements. In this study, we found that plasma NE level is above the upper limit of the normal range in a substantial proportion of patients. Of note, the close similarity of fractional urea clearance in the 3 NE tertiles indicates that high plasma NE in ESRD is not paralleled by the accumulation of metabolic waste products.
NE and Echocardiographic Parameters of LVM
LVH is an adaptive process aimed at minimizing ventricular wall stress. Several factors, including hypertension and altered circadian arterial pressure profile, may influence this process in patients with renal diseases.4 The evidence that the sympathetic system is involved in the progression of cardiovascular structural alterations such as LVH and arterial remodeling in the general population is now substantial.10 NE promotes myocardial cell hypertrophy in vitro,27 and in vivo sustained sympathetic activity generates myocardial hypertrophy by mechanisms that are only in part dependent on raised arterial pressure.1 In line with observations suggesting that hypertension only in part accounts for raised LVM, we found that the link between the muscular component of LVM (mean wall thickness) and plasma NE was largely independent of arterial pressure and other risk factors. Concentric hypertrophy in dialysis patients entails an ominous prognosis, even worse than that of eccentric hypertrophy.4 Studies by London et al28 indicate that arterial rigidity is perhaps the major factor triggering concentric LVH in these patients. The sympathetic nervous system exerts a marked tonic restraint of arterial distensibility in man.29 We speculate that in addition to high calcium phosphate product30 and endothelial dysfunction,31 high NE may be another mechanism linking raised NE, reduced arterial distensibility, and concentric hypertrophy in dialysis patients.
Study Limitations
An important limitation of peripheral venous NE is that it may not reflect local sympathetic activity in the heart. High peripheral sympathetic drive (by sympathetic microneurography) has been recently associated to LVH in essential hypertension.32 Although the issue deserves further study, it is worth noting that increased peripheral NE is associated with relatively higher LVM33 and that coronary venous plasma concentration of NE is higher in essential hypertensives with LVH than in those without LVH.34 Furthermore NE spillover is distinctly increased in physiological LVH in athletes.35 There are no studies exploring regional (cardiac) sympathetic activity in patients with renal failure. However, cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine clearance is rapid in patients with chronic renal failure on dialysis, particularly in those with left ventricule dysfunction or LVH, suggesting cardiac sympathetic over-activity in these patients.36 Our study had a power greater than 95% to detect a correlation coefficient (for the relationship between NE and echocardiographic parameters of LVM) equal to 0.28 with a P<0.01. Thus, the statistical strength of our study explains why, notwithstanding the weaker reproducibility of plasma NE measurements in comparison to more refined techniques,26 we have been able to capture an association between this neurotransmitter and the muscular component of the left ventricle in dialysis patients.
A second limitation of our study derives from its cross-sectional design. As previously discussed, raised sympathetic activity may be causally involved in the pathogenesis of concentric LVH in dialysis patients; yet, the opposite viewpoint is in theory possible. In other words, it can also be hypothesized that raised NE is a consequence of concentric LVH because stimulation of cardiac afferent fibers may be altered in the hypertrophied ventricle. The same problem applies to left ventricular dysfunction because raised NE may be a cause or an effect of this alteration. The issue of causality cannot be resolved on the basis of the present cross-sectional data.
Finally, it is important noting that because circulating NE is a less reproducible marker of sympathetic function than sympathetic microneurography, 26 due to regression dilution bias, 37 our study may substantially underestimate the association between sympathetic activity and echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle in dialysis patients.
Perspectives
High-circulating NE is associated to concentric LVH in patients with ESRD. Increased norepinephrine is an important cardiovascular risk factor in these patients.9 The cardiovascular mortality in ESRD is exceedingly high, and controlling this cardiovascular epidemics is considered an absolute priority.38 Our data lend support to the hypothesis that LVH may represent an intermediate mechanism mediating the adverse effect of circulating NE on the heart in these patients. This is important because the effects of raised NE can be modified by appropriate therapeutic interventions. Clinical trials with antiadrenergic drugs will establish whether the link between plasma NE and alterations in LVM and function is a causal one.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported in part by a grant from the Regional Health Authority of Calabria (Fondi finalizzati per linsufficienza renale cronica Regione Calabria, 1997). We are grateful to Dr Isabella Fermo (S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan) for the measurement of plasma total homocysteine concentration.
Received February 15, 2002; accepted May 3, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Murray DC, Barre PE. The prognostic importance of left ventricular geometry in uremic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995; 5: 20242031.[Abstract]
3. Zoccali C, Benedetto FA, Mallamaci F, Tripepi G, Giacone G, Cataliotti A, Seminara G, Stancanelli B, Malatino LS. Prognostic impact of the indexation of left ventricular mass in patients undergoing dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 27682774.
4. Middleton RJ, Parfrey PS, Foley RN. Left ventricular hypertrophy in the renal patient. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 10791084.
5. Ligtenberg G, Blankestijn PJ, Oey PL, Klein IH, Dijkhorst-Oei LT, Boomsma F, Wieneke GH, van Huffelen AC, Koomans HA. Reduction of sympathetic hyperactivity by enalapril in patients with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 13211328.
6. Converse RL Jr, Jacobsen TN, Toto RD, Jost CM, Cosentino F, Fouad-Tarazi F, Victor RG. Sympathetic overactivity in patients with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 19121918.[Abstract]
7. Campese VM. The kidney and the neurogenic control of blood pressure in renal disease. J Nephrol. 2000; 13: 221224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Augustyniak RA, Tuncel M, Zhang W, Toto RD, Victor RG. Sympathetic overactivity as a cause of hypertension in chronic renal failure. J Hypertens. 2002; 20: 39.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Parlongo S, Cutrupi S, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Bonanno G, Rapisarda F, Fatuzzo P, Seminara G, Stancanelli B, Malatino LS. Plasma norepinephrine predicts survival and incident cardiovascular events in patients with end stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002; 105: 13541359.
10. Mancia G, Grassi G, Giannattasio C, Seravalle G. Sympathetic activation in the pathogenesis of hypertension and progression of organ damage. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 724728.
11. Fermo I, Arcelloni C, Mazzola G, DAngelo A, Paroni R. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for measuring total plasma homocysteine levels. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1998; 719: 3136.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lenders JW, Keiser HR, Goldstein DS, Willemsen JJ, Friberg P, Jacobs MC, Kloppenborg PW, Thien T, Eisenhofer G. Plasma metanephrine in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Ann Int Med. 1995; 123: 101109.
13. Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Tripepi G, Benedetto FA, Cottini E, Giacone G, Malatino L. Prediction of left ventricular geometry by clinic, pre-dialysis and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring in hemodialysis patients. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 17511758.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, Meyer RA, Roman MJ, de Divitiis O, Alderman MH. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 12511260.[Abstract]
15. Zoccali C, Benedetto FA, Mallamaci F, Tripepi G, Giacone G, Cataliotti A, Seminara G, Stancanelli B, Malatino LS. The prognostic impact of the indexations of left ventricular mass in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 27682774.
16. Ganau A, Saba PS, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Realdi G, Devereux RB. Ageing induces left ventricular concentric remodeling in normotensive subjects. J Hypertens. 1995; 13: 18181822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Brecht HM, Ernst W, Koch KM. Plasma noradrenaline levels in regular haemodialysis patients. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1976; 12: 281290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Atuk NO, Bailey CJ, Turner S, Peach MJ, Westervelt FB Jr. Red blood cell catechol-o-methyl transferase, plasma catecholamines and renin in renal failure. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976; 22: 195200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Henrich WL, Katz FH, Molinoff PB, Schrier RW. Competitive effects of hypokalemia and volume depletion on plasma renin activity, aldosterone and catecholamine concentrations in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1977; 12: 279284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. McGrath BP, Ledingham JGC, Benedict CR. Catecholamines in peripheral venous plasma in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978; 55: 8996.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Izzo JL Jr, Izzo MS, Sterns RH, Freeman RB. Sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1982; 28: 604607.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Zuccala A, Chiarini C, Degli Esposti E, Gaggi R, Santoro A, Sturani A, Zucchelli P. Plasma noradrenaline and blood pressure in uremia. J Clin Hypertens. 1985; 1: 161169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Schohn D, Weidmann P, Jahn H, Beretta-Piccoli C. Norepinephrine-related mechanism in hypertension accompanying renal failure. Kidney Int. 1985; 28: 814822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Elias AN, Vaziri ND, Maksy M. Plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine levels in end-stage renal disease: effect of hemodialysis. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145: 10131015.
25. Cuche JL, Prinseau J, Selz F, Ruget G, Baglin A. Plasma free, sulfo- and glucuro-conjugated catecholamines in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 1986; 30: 566572.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Grassi G, Esler M. How to assess sympathetic activity in humans. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 719734.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Simpson P. Norepinephrine-stimulated hypertrophy of cultured rat myocardial cells is an
1 adrenergic response. J Clin Invest. 1983; 72: 732738.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28. London G M. Guerin A P. Marchais S J. Pannier B, Safar M E. Day M, Metivier F. Cardiac and arterial interactions in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 1996; 50: 600608.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Failla M, Grappiolo A, Emanuelli G, Vitale G, Fraschini N, Bigoni M, Grieco N, Denti M, Giannattasio C, Mancia G. Sympathetic tone restrains arterial distensibility of healthy and atherosclerotic subjects. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 11171123.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, London GM. Arterial calcifications, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular risk in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 938942.
31. Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Metivier F, Safar ME, London GM. Postischemic vasodilation, endothelial activation, and cardiovascular remodeling in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2000; 57: 10911099.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Greenwood JP, Scott EM, Stoker JB, Mary DA. Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: relation to peripheral sympathetic drive. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 17111717.
33. Marcus R, Krause L, Weder AB, Mejia AD, Schork NJ, and Julius S. Sex-specific determinants of increased left ventricular mass in the Tecumseh blood pressure study. Circulation. 1994; 90: 928936.
34. Kelm M, Schafer S, and Mingers S, Heydthausen M, Vogt M, Motz W, Strauer BE. Left ventricular mass is linked to cardiac noradrenaline in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 13571364.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Neri Serneri GG, Boddi M, Modesti PA, Cecioni I, Coppo M, Padeletti L, Michelucci A, Colella A, Galanti G. Increased cardiac sympathetic activity and insulin-like growth factor-I formation are associated with physiological hypertrophy in athletes. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 977982.
36. Kurata C, Wakabayashi Y, Shouda S, Okayama K, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa A, Suzuki K, Ishizuka T, Sakamoto S, Tawarahara K. Enhanced cardiac clearance of iodine-123-MIBG in chronic renal failure. J Nuclear Med. 1995; 37: 20372043.
37. Peto R. Two properties of multiple regression analysis and regression to the mean (and regression from the mean).In: Fletcher CM, Peto R, Tinker CM, Speizer FE, eds. The Natural History of Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema: An Eight-Year Study of Early Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease in Working Men in London. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976: 218223.
38. Levey AS, Beto JA, Coronado BE, Eknoyan G, Foley RN, Kasiske BL, Klag MJ, Mailloux LU, Manske CL, Meyer KB, Parfrey PS, Pfeffer MA, Wenger NK, Wilson PW, Wright JT Jr. Controlling the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease: what do we know? What do we need to learn? Where do we go from here? National Kidney Foundation Task Force on Cardiovascular Disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998; 32: 853906.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Tripepi, F. Mattace-Raso, F. Mallamaci, F. A. Benedetto, J. Witteman, L. Malatino, and C. Zoccali Biomarkers of Left Atrial Volume: A Longitudinal Study in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 818 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Chan Heart rate variability in patients with end-stage renal disease: an emerging predictive tool for sudden cardiac death? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3061 - 3062. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Li, J. Xu, P. Wang, H. Velazquez, Y. Li, Y. Wu, and G. V. Desir Catecholamines Regulate the Activity, Secretion, and Synthesis of Renalase Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1277 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zoccali, F. Mallamaci, F. A. Benedetto, G. Tripepi, P. Pizzini, S. Cutrupi, and L. Malatino Urotensin II and Cardiomyopathy in End-Stage Renal Disease Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 326 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Peterson, T. de Backer, A. Gabriel, V. Ilic, T. Vagaonescu, L. J. Appel, G. Contreras, C. Kendrick, S. Rostand, R. A. Phillips, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the African American Study of Kidney Disease Cohort Study Hypertension, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1033 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|
P. J. Blankestijn SYMPATHETIC HYPERACTIVITY--A HIDDEN ENEMY IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S293 - S297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Neumann, G. Ligtenberg, I. H.T. Klein, P. Boer, P. L. Oey, H. A. Koomans, and P. J. Blankestijn Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Is Reduced During Standard Treatment Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 506 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Blankestijn Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic kidney disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1354 - 1357. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Koomans, P. J. Blankestijn, and J. A. Joles Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Chronic Renal Failure: A Wake-up Call J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 524 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mallamaci, G. Tripepi, R. Maas, L. Malatino, R. Boger, and C. Zoccali Analysis of the Relationship between Norepinephrine and Asymmetric Dimethyl Arginine Levels among Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 435 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zoccali, F. Mallamaci, and G. Tripepi Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factors in End-Stage Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2004; 15(90010): S77 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone Left Ventricular Geometry and Hypotension in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Mechanical Perspective J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2421 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zoccali, F. Mallamaci, G. Tripepi, F. A. Benedetto, S. Parlongo, S. Cutrupi, D. Iellamo, G. Bonanno, F. Rapisarda, P. Fatuzzo, et al. Prospective Study of Neuropeptide Y as an Adverse Cardiovascular Risk Factor in End-Stage Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2611 - 2617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |