| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2002;40:74.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Clinica Medica, University of Milano Bicocca and San Gerardo Hospital (C.G., A.P., M.F., A.V., G.M.), Monza; Centro Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione (G.M.), Milano; and IRCCS Ospedale San Luca (C.G., G.M.), Milano, Italy.
Correspondence to Prof Giuseppe Mancia, Clinica Medica, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Via Donizetti 106, 20052 Monza (MI), Italy. E-mail giuseppe.mancia{at}unimib.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: blood flow vasodilation endothelium hemoglobin viscosity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, shear stress also depends on blood viscosity, whose changes might thus affect NO in a manner that is not primarily reflected by changes in blood flow.1,2 The aim of our study has been to provide information on whether and how changes in blood viscosity modulate endothelial function in humans, as assessed by the increase in radial artery diameter induced by ischemia of the hand. Despite its obvious importance for proper quantification of endothelial stimuli and thus comparison of endothelial function in health and disease, this issue has been addressed in animals811 but never in humans.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelial Function
Radial artery diameter was measured by an A-mode ultrasonic echo-tracking device that recorded the displacement of the radial artery over the cardiac cycle (NIUS 02).12 The device used a transducer of 10 MHz, which was stereotaxically positioned over the radial artery 2 to 4 cm above the wrist, with a gel used as a medium. With the subject supine and the arm immobile at the heart level, the transducer was oriented perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis, based on the acoustic Doppler signal, so that its focal zone was located in the center of the artery and the backscattered echoes from both the anterior and the posterior walls could be visualized and acquired at 50 Hz.12 The device resolution allowed us to identify diameter changes of 0.0025 mm during blood pressure changes from diastole to systole.12,13 The device also made use of a photoplethysmographic system (Finapres, Ohmeda, Englewood Co). Blood pressure was recorded noninvasively from a finger ipsilateral to the radial artery examined with an accuracy similar to intra-arterial radial artery pressure and a resolution of 2 mm Hg.14 Heart rate was calculated as the reciprocal of two successive beats.
Blood flow velocity was measured at the same site of the diameter measurement by an 8-MHz probe positioned with an angle of 40° to 60° from the principal axis of the artery. Blood flow was calculated as the product of flow velocity and arterial diameter. Measurements were made before and immediately after a 4-minute inflation of a pediatric cuff placed around the wrist below the site of radial artery measurements. This maneuver leads to an increase in radial artery diameter that which is abolished by LNMA administration, thus indicating its dependence on a flow-mediated local increase in NO.7 Radial artery diameter and blood flow were additionally measured after a 12 minutes inflation of an arm cuff at suprasystolic pressure to estimate the increase in radial artery diameter caused by maximal increase in blood flow.15
Protocol and Data Analysis
Each patient came to our laboratory in the afternoon after a 24-hour abstinence from alcohol and caffeine and after a light morning meal. The study was performed at a constant temperature (21°C). The protocol of the study was as follows: (1) each subject was placed in the supine position and fitted with the radial artery echo-tracking device, the blood pressure measuring devices, and the wrist and arm cuff, (2) after a 10-minute interval, radial artery diameter, blood pressure, and blood flow velocity were continuously measured during 15 minutes (baseline) and venous samples were withdrawn to estimate the hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration, (3) in half of the patients the pediatric cuff placed on the wrist was inflated at suprasystolic pressure for 4 minutes and the above parameters were recorded for 4 minutes after the release of the inflation; after a 10-minute interval, the cuff placed around the arm was inflated at suprasystolic pressure for 12 minutes and measurements were made for 4 minutes after the release of the inflation, (4) in the other half of the patients, the 12-minute arm ischemia preceded the shorter 4-minute hand ischemia. (5) In each patient, 500 mL of venous blood was removed followed by 500 mL of saline infusion to maintain blood volume constant, and (6) a venous blood sample was withdrawn to estimate hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration, and the procedures described at points 2, 3, and 4 were performed again.
In each subject, baseline value for arterial diameter and blood flow was obtained by averaging five 30-second measurements obtained during the 15-minute period. The blood flow response to either the 4-minute or the 12-minute ischemia was assessed as the peak value during the 50 seconds after the cuff pressure release. The radial artery diameter response to the short and long ischemia was assessed as the peak value during the 180 seconds after cuff pressure release. All measurements were made by a single investigator. The intraobserver coefficient of variation of radial artery diameter and blood flow (calculated for 2 sets of values obtained in standardized conditions) is, respectively, 2.5% and 8.0% in baseline conditions, 3.5% and 9.0% after 4-minute ischemia, and 1.9% and 7% after 12-minute ischemia. The statistical significance of the differences in mean values was assessed by 2-way ANOVA. The 2-tailed t test for paired observations was used to locate differences. A probability value of <0.05 was taken as the level of statistical significance. Throughout the text, values are given as ±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Blood removal also significantly though modestly enhanced the much greater increase in radial artery blood flow induced by the 12-minute ischemia, but in contrast with the 4-minute ischemia it attenuated to a much lesser degree the concomitant greater increase in radial artery diameter, which remained statistically significant.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A few other aspects of our study deserve to be mentioned. In our patients, the NO-mediated radial artery diameter response to the 4-minute ischemia was markedly impaired by a reduction in blood viscosity despite (1) only a modest reduction of hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit and (2) a concomitant enhancement in the ischemic-dependent increase in blood flow. We can speculate that the important role of blood viscosity in the relation between shear stress and NO may be permissive in nature. Namely, that blood viscosity may maintain the ability of shear stress forces triggered by blood flow changes to act as a NO stimulus. We can also speculate that this is the case also when these forces are even more markedly recruited because the larger increase in radial artery diameter that accompanied the increase in blood flow induced by the 12-minute ischemia was also attenuated after the reduction in blood viscosity. The only difference with the data obtained by the short-term ischemia was that the residual increase in diameter remained large presumably because of its predominant dependence on nonendothelial factors.
Our results obviously pertain to the vascular district that we examined, and it is thus impossible to exclude that in other vessels endothelial cells are differently sensitive to the interaction between blood viscosity, blood flow, and shear stress stimuli. It is also impossible to exclude that this interaction is different for chronic rather than acute blood viscosity changes and in subjects other than those with hemochromatosis. We were unable, however, to extend our investigation to subjects other than those with hemochromatosis because of the ethical problems posed by removal of blood when this intervention is not therapeutic.
Finally, our findings have implications for current studies on endothelial function in humans that are more and more frequently based on the increase in radial artery diameter induced by a short-term ischemia of the hand, because this noninvasive approach allows larger numbers of patients to be evaluated and the evaluation to be repeated under different circumstances and therapeutic interventions. It is clear for our data that long-term ischemia of the forearm and the hand affect the radial artery diameter in a fashion that is by no means comparable to that induced by short-term ischemia limited to the hand only. The two maneuvers should thus not be used, and the results on radial artery diameter and forearm blood flow should not be interpreted interchangeably. Evidence regarding endothelial dependence is limited to alterations in radial artery diameter caused by short-term hand ischemia, as performed in this study.
It is also clear that considering the " endothelial" stimuli only in terms of increases in blood flow is not enough. Assessment of blood viscosity directly or through hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, or other techniques is also needed to ensure that differences or similarities in endothelium-dependent responses really reflect changes or lack of changes in endothelial function.
Perspectives
Our study has important methodologic implications for current studies on endothelial function in humans, more and more frequently based on the increase in radial artery diameter induced by a short-term ischemia of the hand. It is clear from our data that considering the "endothelial" stimuli only in terms of increase in blood flow is not enough. Assessment of blood viscosity directly or through hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit is also needed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 4, 2002; accepted May 7, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 1997; 18: E19E29.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Quaschning T, Ruschitzka F, Shaw S, Luscher TF. Aldosterone receptor antagonism normalizes vascular function in liquorice-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 801805.
4. Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Salvetti G, Salvetti A. Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. J Nephrol. 2000; 13: 205210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Quyyumi AA, Mulcahy D, Andrews NP, Husain S, Panza JA, Cannon RO III. Coronary vascular nitric oxide activity in hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: comparison of acetylcholine and substance P. Circulation. 1997; 95: 104110.
6. Hornig B, Arakawa N, Haussmann D, Drexler H. Differential effects of quinaprilat and enalaprilat on endothelial function of conduit arteries in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998; 98: 28422848.
7. Joannides R, Haefeli WE, Linder L, Richard V, Bakkali EH, Thuillez C, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide is responsible for flow-dependent dilation of human peripheral conduit arteries in vivo. Circulation. 1995; 91: 13141319.
8. Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA, Khayutin VM. Endothelium dependent control of arterial diameter by blood viscosity. Cardiovasc Res. 1989; 23: 741747.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Tsai AG, Friesenecker B, MacCarthy M, Sakai H, Intaglietta M. Plasma viscosity regulates capillary perfusion during extreme hemodilution in hamster skinfold model. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H2170H2180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Walker BR, Resta TC, Nelin LD. Nitric oxide-dependent pulmonary vasodilation in polycythemic rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H2382H2389.
11. Bertuglia S. Increased viscosity is protective for arteriolar endothelium and microvascular perfusion during severe hemodilution in hamster cheek pouch. Microvasc Res. 2001; 61: 5663.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Tardy Y, Meister JJ, Perret F, Brunner HR, Arditi M. Noninvasive estimate of the mechanical properties of peripheral arteries from ultrasonic and photoplethysmographic measurements. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1991; 12: 3954.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Girerd X, Mourad JJ, Acar C, Heudes D, Chiché S, Bruneval P, Mignot JP, Billaud E, Safar M, Laurent S. Noninvasive measurement of medium-sized artery wall thickness in humans: in vitro validation. J Vasc Res. 1994; 31: 114120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Parati G, A. Casadei A, Groppelli M, Di Rienzo G. Mancia. Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing. Hypertension. 1989; 13: 645647.
15. Trazzi S, Omboni S, Santucciu C, Parati G, Mancia G. Variability in arterial diameter and compliance: compliance modulation reserve. J Hypertens. 1992; 10: S41S43.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Boulanger, N. Amabile, A. P. Guerin, B. Pannier, A. S. Leroyer, Z. Mallat, C. Nguyen, A. Tedgui, and G. M. London In Vivo Shear Stress Determines Circulating Levels of Endothelial Microparticles in End-Stage Renal Disease Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 902 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Verbeke, M. Agharazii, P. Boutouyrie, B. Pannier, A. P. Guerin, and G. M. London Local Shear Stress and Brachial Artery Functions in End-Stage Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 621 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Narayan, V. Papademetriou, K. Wachtell, E. Gerdts, K. Boman, M. S. Nieminen, G. de Simone, B. Dahlof, F. Fyhrquist, A. Hoieggen, et al. Association of Hemoglobin Delivery With Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Hypertensive Patients: Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension Study Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 868 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Natali, E. Toschi, S. Baldeweg, A. Casolaro, S. Baldi, A. M. Sironi, J. S. Yudkin, and E. Ferrannini Haematocrit, type 2 diabetes, and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of resistance vessels Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2005; 26(5): 464 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Pyke, E. M. Dwyer, and M. E. Tschakovsky Impact of controlling shear rate on flow-mediated dilation responses in the brachial artery of humans J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 499 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |