Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;40:239-243
Published online before print August 5, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000030154.90042.4C
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/239    most recent
01.HYP.0000030154.90042.4Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maceira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Díez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maceira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Díez, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Hypertension. 2002;40:239.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Ultrasonic Backscatter and Diastolic Function in Hypertensive Patients

Alicia M. Maceira; Joaquín Barba; Oscar Beloqui; Javier Díez

From the Departments of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery (A.M.M., J.B., J.D.) and the Department of Internal Medicine (O.B.), University Clinic; and Division of Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, School of Medicine (J.D.), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Correspondence to Dr Javier Díez, División de Fisiopatología Cardiovascular, Facultad de Medicina, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31080 Pamplona, Spain. E-mail jadimar{at}unav.es


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study was designed to assess whether ultrasonic reflectivity, evaluated by a real-time integrated backscatter analysis, was related to the severity of diastolic dysfunction, as studied by Doppler echocardiography in patients with essential hypertension. One hundred nine subjects were included in the study. Diastolic function was assessed by mitral-inflow Doppler ultrasound recordings. Backscatter cyclic variation and maximal intensity were measured in 6 regions throughout the left ventricle. The subjects were classified in 5 groups according to blood pressure and diastolic function: 29 normotensives with normal diastolic function (group 1), 18 hypertensives with normal diastolic function (group 2), 47 hypertensives with a delayed relaxation pattern (group 3), 11 hypertensives with a pseudonormal filling pattern (group 4), and 4 hypertensives with a restrictive filling pattern (group 5). The highest cyclic variation was found in groups 1 and 2, the lowest in groups 4 and 5 (5.7±0.2 dB in group 1 and 5.7±0.2 dB in group 2 versus 2.9±0.3 dB in group 4 and 2.1±0.4 dB in group 5; P<0.001), with intermediate values in group 3 (5.2±0.2 dB). Cyclic variation was inversely correlated with left ventricular chamber stiffness (P<0.05) and directly correlated with midwall fractional shortening (P<0.02) in all hypertensives. No differences in maximal intensity were found among the 5 groups of subjects. These results show an association between diminished cyclic variation of backscatter and deterioration of diastolic function in hypertensive patients. Thus, alterations in this parameter may be useful for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension.


Key Words: diastole • hypertension, essential • ultrasonography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
An exaggerated accumulation of fibrillar collagens type I and type III occurs throughout the free wall and interventricular septum of animals1,2 and humans3,4 with primary arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A number of experimental57 and clinical811 studies have shown that myocardial fibrosis is mainly caused by an excessive synthesis of fibrillar collagen. This rise in collagen content has been shown to raise myocardial stiffness and promote abnormalities of diastolic and systolic cardiac function, electrical activity, and intramyocardial perfusion.12 In this regard, we have reported recently13 that a correlation exists between myocardial collagen content and left ventricular chamber stiffness, as assessed from the deceleration time of the early mitral filling, as measured by Doppler echocardiography, in hypertensive patients.

Quantitative characterization of myocardial texture by means of analysis of ultrasonic reflectivity has been experimentally1417 and clinically1821 shown to correlate with the collagen content of the myocardial tissue. We, thus, have hypothesized that the severity of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension should be associated with alterations in myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity detected by backscatter analysis. To test our hypothesis, maximal intensity (MI) and cyclic variation (CV) of backscatter signal were analyzed in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients classified according to their diastolic function.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The study population consisted of 109 subjects (43 men and 66 women; mean age 53 years; range 22 to 80 years) who were referred to our unit for routine cardiac evaluation. Eighty subjects presented elevated systolic blood pressure >139 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure >89 mm Hg. The study was approved by the review committee of the University Clinic of Navarra, and all the subjects gave informed consent.

All patients had appropriate clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations to exclude secondary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiac disease that was not hypertensive heart disease. None of the subjects exhibited clinical manifestations suggestive of heart failure.

Assessment of Left Ventricular Anatomy and Function
2D targeted M-mode and Doppler ultrasound recordings were obtained in each patient as described previously.10,11 Left ventricular mass and interventricular septal thickness were measured, and left ventricular mass index was calculated by dividing left ventricular mass by body surface area. The following pulsed Doppler measurements were obtained: maximal early transmitral velocity in diastole (VE), maximal late transmitral velocity in diastole (VA), A wave deceleration time (DT), and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT). Left ventricular endocardial fractional shortening and ejection fraction were calculated according to the method of Quinones et al.22 Left ventricular midwall fractional shortening (MWFS) was calculated according to De Simone et al.23

LVH was considered to be present when left ventricular mass index was >116 g/m2 in men and >104 g/m2 in women and/or interventricular septal thickness was >11 mm.24 Diastolic dysfunction was defined as alterations in VE/VA ratio, and/or IVRT, and/or DT, and was classified in the following patterns according to the method of García et al25: delayed relaxation (VE:VA<1; IVRT>100 ms; DT>220 ms), pseudonormal filling (VE:VA=1 to 2; IVRT=60 to 100 ms; DT=150 to 200 ms), and restrictive filling (VE:VA>2; IVRT<60 ms; DT<150 ms). Left ventricular chamber stiffness (KLV) was calculated according to the following equation26: KLV=(0.07:TDEC)2 mm Hg/mL.

Analysis of Backscatter Signal
To perform the backscatter tissue characterization, a SONOS 5500 ultrasound system (Philips) with backscatter software was used. Six regions of interest were chosen throughout the left ventricular myocardium in the following views: mid septum and mid posterior wall in the parasternal long-axis view, mid portion of the anterior, lateral and inferior walls in the parasternal short-axis view, and apex in the apical 4-chamber view. In each region, backscatter images were acquired in continuous-loop review format, and an independent expert, blinded to the group of inclusion of the studied subject, made the signal analysis offline. The signal values were adjusted to local gain and depth in every region. For each region, a time-dependent curve was obtained from which MI and CV were calculated as described elsewhere.27 For covariates in the statistical analysis, time-gain compensation and depth were also measured in each region.

Repeated measurements were performed to assess variability of backscatter measurements. The intraobserver variability was 0.3±0.2 dB for CV and 2.3±1.1 dB for MI. The interobserver variability was 0.8±0.5 dB for CV and 2.9±2.0 dB for MI.

Statistical Analysis
For the statistical analysis, the 10.0 version of SPSS software (SPSS Inc) was used. All the quantitative variables were tested for Gaussian distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; all of them followed this distribution and are presented as mean±SD.

A repeated-measures mixed-factorial design, with myocardial region as intrasubject factor and group of inclusion as intersubject factor, was used. The statistical analysis used was a 3-way ANOVA (criteria were subjects, group of inclusion, and myocardial segments). Age, sex, blood pressure, intersubject heterogeneity of the signal, fractional shortening, ejection fraction, MWFS, left ventricular mass index, and echocardiographic time gain compensation and depth were included as covariates in the analysis. The Bonferroni post-hoc test was used whenever a difference was statistically significant. The correlation between continuously distributed variables was tested by univariate regression analysis. In all cases, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Data
Subjects included in the study were classified in 5 groups according to values of blood pressure and diastolic function as follows: 29 normotensive subjects with normal diastolic function (group 1), 18 hypertensive patients with preserved diastolic function (group 2), 47 hypertensives with a delayed relaxation pattern (group 3), 11 hypertensives with a pseudonormal filling pattern (group 4), and 4 hypertensives with a restrictive filling pattern (group 5).

Clinical parameters evaluated in the 5 groups are presented in Table 1. As expected, values of blood pressure were significantly higher in hypertensives from groups 2 through 5 than in normotensives from group 1. Although subjects from group 1 were younger than subjects from the other groups, no significant differences in age were observed among the 4 groups of hypertensives.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Data in All Groups of Subjects

Left Ventricular Anatomy and Function
Table 2 shows the echocardiographic parameters assessing left ventricular anatomy and function. The prevalence of LVH was significantly higher in the 4 groups of hypertensives than in the group of normotensives. In addition, parameters assessing left ventricular mass and dimensions were significantly higher in hypertensives from group 5 than in hypertensives from the other groups. Whereas no significant differences were found either in IVRT or DT among the different groups, the VE/VA ratio was significantly diminished and increased in groups 3 and 5, respectively, compared with the remaining groups. None of the subjects studied exhibited systolic dysfunction, as assessed by an ejection fraction <40%. No differences were found in either ejection fraction or fractional shortening among the different groups. MWFS was significantly decreased in group 5 hypertensives compared with the remaining groups. In addition, KLV was significantly higher in hypertensives from group 5 than in the other groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Echocardiographic Data in All Groups of Subjects

Backscatter Signal
When we analyzed the CV, subject heterogeneity was the only covariate that had a significant impact (P<0.05) and remained in the analysis. Because MWFS was shown to be different among the tested groups, it was also kept as a potential confounding variable. CV varied (P<0.001) throughout the myocardial regions, the maximal value being obtained in the septum and posterior wall and the minimum in the apex and anterior wall in the 5 groups.

As shown in Figure 1, CV was similar in both normotensives and hypertensives with preserved diastolic function, and it gradually diminished throughout the remaining groups of hypertensives, being significantly (P<0.01) lower in groups 4 (2.9±0.3 dB; range 2.4 to 3.5 dB) and 5 (2.1±0.4 dB; range 1.3 to 2.9 dB) compared with groups 1 (5.7±0.2 dB; range 5.3 to 6.1 dB), 2 (5.7±0.2 dB; range 5.3 to 6.2 dB), and 3 (5.3±0.1 dB; range 5.0 to 5.6 dB). These differences remained significant for all the regions studied (Figure 2).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. CV (A) and MI (B) of global backscatter in the 5 groups of subjects classified according to values of blood pressure and diastolic function. *P<0.001.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. CV of regional backscatter in the 5 groups of subjects classified according to values of blood pressure and diastolic function. *P<0.05.

KLV was inversely correlated with CV measured in the septum (r=-0.26, P<0.05), inferior wall (r=-0.25, P<0.05), and apex (r=-0.31, P<0.05) in all hypertensives. In addition, MWFS was directly correlated with CV measured in the septum (r=0.36, P<0.02) and apex (r=0.29, P<0.05) in all hypertensives.

Regarding MI, the only covariates with a significant impact were intersubject heterogeneity and time-gain compensation (P<0.01), and both remained in the analysis. MI also varied (P<0.001) among all the myocardial regions in all groups because it was higher in apex and lower in the lateral wall. We did not find significant differences in MI among groups for either global (Figure 1) or regional values (data not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main findings of this study are as follows: (1) an association exists between echocardiographically assessed altered myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity and progressive deterioration of diastolic filling in patients with arterial hypertension; and (2) alteration of CV of backscatter signal is related to alterations of both left ventricular chamber stiffness and systolic performance.

Several echocardiographic approaches have been used to quantitatively define changes in myocardial ultrasonic reflectivity, among them analysis of the backscatter signal. This signal is produced when the ultrasound interacts with components of the tissue smaller than its wavelength; the reflected signal is scattered, and a part of it (ie, backscatter) is directed toward the probe. Time-domain analysis of this radiofrequency signal provides its MI and the systolic-to-diastolic CV of the intensity. This CV is {approx}5 dB in normal conditions and diminishes in a substantial way in the presence of contractile dysfunction, variation of the elastic properties, or alterations of the geometry of the scatter, etc. In systemic hypertension, an increase of collagen content takes place in the myocardium, so that changes are generated in the backscatter signal.

Whereas no significant changes were found in this study in MI, CV was seen to decrease in hypertensive patients in parallel with the compromise of diastolic function. In fact, values of CV measured in hypertensives with pseudonormal or restrictive filling patterns were below the interval of normal values measured in this study and reported in the literature.28,29 Several other investigators, using alternative methods, have confirmed the presence of diminished cardiac cycle-dependent variation of backscatter in the hypertrophied myocardium of hypertensive patients.3032 In addition, Giorgi et al33 reported recently a direct correlation between CV and the VE/VA ratio in a small group of essential hypertensive patients. Thus, our data further support the notion that ultrasonic reflectivity is related to the severity of diastolic dysfunction in essential hypertension.

The mechanism for the reduction in CV of backscatter in hearts of patients with severe diastolic dysfunction is not clear. Several structural components of the myocardium affect its acoustic properties under physiological and pathological conditions, among them collagen with its complex structure, quantity, geometry, and orientation of the fibers. In hypertension, collagen accumulation in the myocardium occurs, and this fibrotic process causes diastolic dysfunction.12 In this regard, Ciulla et al29 have reported that in hypertensive patients with LVH and histologically assessed myocardial fibrosis, echo amplitude during cardiac cycle is abnormally diminished. Furthermore, we have shown recently that the presence of biochemically assessed severe myocardial fibrosis is associated with decreased CV in patients with essential hypertension.21 Thus, our finding of decreased CV in hypertensives with pseudonormal and restrictive patterns of diastolic filling would suggest that this ultrasonic abnormality is associated with severe myocardial fibrosis in these patients.

As proposed by Weber et al,34 an increase in collagen content adversely influences diastolic stiffness of the myocardium and facilitates diastolic dysfunction. In fact, we have shown recently that in humans with hypertensive heart disease, exaggerated myocardial collagen content is associated with excessive KLV, as assessed noninvasively.13 Thus, the finding here that CV is inversely correlated with KLV further suggests that fibrosis is involved in diminished CV in hypertensives with severe patterns of diastolic dysfunction.

On the other hand, Wickline et al35 have previously shown that subepicardial regions in myocardium from open-chest dogs exhibit reduced CV that parallels their contractile performance. Furthermore, quantitative differences in CV observed among the different myocardial regions have been found to be associated with corresponding regional differences in contractile performance.36,37 Thus, it is possible that slightly reduced systolic function in hypertensive patients with severe patterns of diastolic dysfunction is in part responsible for the observed reduction in CV. This subclinical compromise of left ventricular systolic performance might not be detected by conventional echocardiographic measurements as ejection fraction or fractional shortening, but may be detected by more sensitive parameters as MWFS.23 This possibility is in agreement with our findings that although no differences were observed in either ejection fraction or fractional shortening among the groups, MWFS decreased gradually with the severity of diastolic dysfunction and was directly correlated with CV in all hypertensives.

Limitations of the Study
Some limitations of the study should be acknowledged. First, it was performed on a limited number of hypertensives. Furthermore, some of our patients were under antihypertensive treatment; even though the treatment was inadequate in terms of blood pressure control and the distribution of treated patients was similar in all groups, it may have influenced the main parameters analyzed.

Second, Doppler indices of left ventricular filling were used for diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. The usefulness of these indices is limited, however, by the confounding effects of different physiological variables such as left ventricular relaxation, compliance, and filling pressure. Unfortunately, new echocardiographic applications that provide accurate estimates in the assessment of diastolic function, such as color M-mode and tissue Doppler, were not available in the current study.

Perspectives
The present study demonstrates that cardiac cycle-dependent variation of backscatter signal is abnormally diminished in hypertensive patients with pseudonormal and restrictive patterns of diastolic filling as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Furthermore, the associations here reported of CV with both KLV and MWFS suggest that both changes in the composition of myocardial tissue (ie, fibrosis) and abnormalities of left ventricular midwall contractile performance may contribute to altered CV in hypertensive patients with severe diastolic dysfunction. On the other hand, depressed MWFS has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiac death and also contributes independently to the prediction of cardiovascular morbid events in patients with arterial hypertension.23 Thus, the association of low MDFS with severe LVH and enhanced LV chamber stiffness in hypertensives with a restrictive filling pattern of diastolic dysfunction would suggest a poor cardiac prognosis for these subset of patients. Further studies are required to test this possibility and how antihypertensive treatment would influence these alterations and cardiac outcome in hypertensives.

Received May 20, 2002; first decision June 14, 2002; accepted July 2, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Panizo A, Pardo J, Hernández M, Galindo MF, Cenarruzabeitia E, Díez J. Quinapril decreases myocardial accumulation of extracellular matrix components in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 1995; 8: 815–822.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Brilla CG, Matsubara L, Weber KT. Advanced hypertensive heart disease in spontaneously hypertensive rats: lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 269–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Schwartzkopff B, Motz W, Frenzel H, Vogt M, Knauer S, Strauer BE. Structural and functional alterations of the intramyocardial coronary arterioles in patients with arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1993; 88: 993–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Pearlman ES, Weber KT, Janicki JS, Pietra GG, Fishman AP. Muscle fiber orientation and connective tissue content in the hypertrophied human heart. Lab Invest. 1982; 46: 158–164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Díez J, Panizo A, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Hernandez M, Pardo Mindán J. Serum markers of collagen type I metabolism in spontaneously hypertensive rats: relation to myocardial fibrosis. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1026–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Varo N, Etayo JC, Zalba G, Beaumont J, Iraburu MJ, Montiel C, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Díez J. Losartan inhibits the post-transcriptional synthesis of collagen type I and reverses left ventricular fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 107–114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Varo N, Iraburu MJ, Varela M, López B, Etayo JC, Díez J. Chronic AT1 blockade stimulates extracellular collagen type I degradation and reverses myocardial fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1197–1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Díez J, Laviades C, Mayor G, Gil MJ, Monreal I. Increased serum concentrations of procollagen peptides in essential hypertension: relation to cardiac alterations. Circulation. 1995; 91: 1450–1456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Laviades C, Varo N, Fernández J, Mayor G, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Díez J. Abnormalities of the extracellular degradation of collagen type I in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998; 98: 535–540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Querejeta R, Varo N, López B, Larman M, Artiñano E, Etayo JC, Martínez Ubago JL, Gutierrez-Stampa M, Emparanza JI, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Pardo Mindán J, Díez J. Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I is a marker of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1729–1735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. López B, Querejeta R, Varo N, González A, Larman M, Martínez Ubago JL, Díez J. Usefulness of serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I in assessment of the cardioreparative ability of antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2001; 104: 286–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Díez J, López B, González A, Querejeta R. Clinical aspects of hypertensive myocardial fibrosis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001; 16: 328–335.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Díez J, Querejeta R, López B, González A, Larman M, Martínez Ubago JL. Losartan-dependent regression of myocardial fibrosis is associated with reduction of left ventricular chamber stiffness in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2512–2517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Mimbs JW, O’Donnell M, Bauwens D, Miller JG, Sobel BE. The dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter on collagen content in dog and rabbit hearts. Circ Res. 1980; 47: 48–58.

15. Pérez JE, Barzilai B, Madaras EI, Glueck RM, Saffitz JE, Johnston P, Miller JG, Sobel BE. Applicability of ultrasonic tissue characterisation for longitudinal assessment and differentiation of calcification and fibrosis in cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4: 88–95.[Abstract]

16. O’Donnell M, Mimbs JW, Miller JG. The relationship between collagen and ultrasonic backscatter in myocardial tissue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981; 69: 580–588.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Hoyt RM, Skorton DJ, Collins SM, Melton HE. Ultrasonic backscatter and collagen in normal ventricular myocardium. Circulation. 1984; 69: 775–782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Picano E, Pelosi G, Marzilli M, Lattanzi F, Benassi A, Landini L, L’Abbate A. In vivo quantitative ultrasonic evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in humans. Circulation. 1990; 81: 58–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Vered Z, Barzilai B, Mohr GA, Thomas LJIII, Genton R, Sobel BE, Shoup TA, Melton HE, Miller JG, Pérez JE. Quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization with real-time–integrated backscatter imaging in normal human subjects and in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1987; 76: 1067–1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Naito J, Masuyama T, Mano T, Kondo H, Yamamoto K, Nagano R, Doi Y, Hori M, Kamada T. Ultrasonic myocardial tissue characterization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: value in non-invasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis. Am Heart J. 1996; 131: 115–121.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Maceira AM, Barba J, Varo N, Beloqui O, Díez J. Ultrasonic backscatter and serum marker of cardiac fibrosis in hypertensives. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 923–928.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Quinones MA, Pickering E, Alexander JK. Percentage of shortening of the echocardiographic left ventricular dimension: its use in determining ejection fraction and stroke volume. Chest. 1987; 74: 59–65.

23. De Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, Mensah GA, Casale PN, Laragh JH. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1996; 93: 259–265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Devereux RB, Dahlöf B, Levy D, Pfeffer MA. Comparison of enalapril versus nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (the PRESERVE trial). Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 865–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Garcia MJ, Firstenberg MS, Greenberg NL, Smedira N, Rodriguez L, Prior D, Thomas JD. Estimation of left ventricular operating stiffness from Doppler early filling deceleration time in humans. Am J Physiol. 2001; 280: H554–H561.

27. Masuyama T, St Goar FG, Tye TL, Oppenheim G, Schnittger I, Popp RL. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of human hypertrophied hearts in vivo with cardiac cycle-dependent variation in integrated backscatter. Circulation. 1989; 80: 925–934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Madaras EI, Perez J, Sobel BE, Mottley JG, Miller JG. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: II. Measurements in vivo. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 83: 762–769.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Ciulla M, Paliotti R, Hess DB, Tjahja E, Campbell SE, Magrini F, Weber KT. Echocardiographic patterns of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients: endomyocardial biopsy versus ultrasonic tissue characterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10: 657–664.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Di Bello V, Pedrinelli R, Bianchi M, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Valenti G, Ghione S, Corchia A, Dell’Olmo G, Paterni M, Giusti C. Ultrasonic myocardial texture in hypertensive mild-to-moderate left ventricular hypertrophy: a videodensitometric study. Am J Hypertens. 1998; 11: 155–164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Di Bello VD, Pedrinelli R, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Talini E, Caputo MT, Dell’Olomo G, Cioppi A, Moretti L, Paterni M, Giusti C. The potential prognostic value of ultrasonic characterization (videodensitometry) of myocardial tissue in essential hypertension. Coron Artery Dis. 2000; 11: 513–521.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Di Bello V, Pedrinelli R, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Caputo MT, Cioppi A, Talini E, Leonardo M, Dell’Olmo G, Paterni M, Giusti C. Microalbuminuria, pulse pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, and myocardial ultrasonic tissue characterization in essential hypertension. Angiology. 2001; 52: 175–183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Giorgi D, Di Bello V, Pedrinelli R, Bertini A, Talini E, Dell’Olmo G, Mengozzi G, Palagi C, Dell’Anna R, Mariani M. Ultrasonic tissue characterization and Doppler tissue imaging in the analysis of left ventricular function in essential arterial hypertension: a preliminary study. Echocardiography. 2002; 19: 187–198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Weber KT, Brilla CG, Janicki JS. Myocardial fibrosis: functional significance and regulatory factors. Cardiovasc Res. 1993; 27: 341–348.[Free Full Text]

35. Wickline SA, Thomas LJIII, Miller JG, Sobel BE, Pérez JE. The dependence of myocardial ultrasonic backscatter on contractile performance. Circulation. 1985; 72: 189–194.

36. Haendchen RV, Wyatt HL, Maurer G, Zwehl W, Baer M, Meerbaum S, Corday E. Quantitation of regional function by two-dimensional echocardiography, I: patterns of contraction in the normal left ventricle. Circulation. 1983; 67: 1234–1240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Hartford M, Wikstrand JC, Wallentin I, Ljungman SM, Berglund GL. Left ventricular wall stress and systolic function in untreated primary hypertension. Hypertension. 1985; 7: 97–104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. de Simone, J. S. Gottdiener, M. Chinali, and M. S. Maurer
Left ventricular mass predicts heart failure not related to previous myocardial infarction: the Cardiovascular Health Study
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 741 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/239    most recent
01.HYP.0000030154.90042.4Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maceira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Díez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maceira, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Díez, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Echocardiography