| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2002;40:335.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (J.Y.H.C., L.W., H.L.), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China; and Center for Neuroscience, National Sun Yat-sen University (S.H.H.C.), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Correspondence to Samuel H.H. Chan, PhD, Center for Neuroscience, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, Republic of China. E-mail schan{at}mail.nsysu.edu.tw
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: receptors, angiotensin Fos protein nucleus tractus solitarii transcription hypertension, genetic rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arterial baroreceptor reflex (BRR) is one of the fundamental operating mechanisms via which the central nervous system maintains stable blood pressure.7 Consequently, hypertensive patients8,9 and animals with genetic10,11 or experimentally induced12,13 hypertension manifest retarded BRR sensitivity. In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), hyperactivity of the brain angiotensin system, including an increase in the number of AT1R in brain areas that are relevant to cardiovascular control,1416 is suggested to play an important role in this form of genetic hypertension. One of the modes of action in this regard is the reduction in BRR sensitivity exerted by angiotensin (Ang) II via an action on the AT1R, but not AT2R,1719 in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS), the principal terminal site of the primary baroreceptor afferents.20
Our laboratory demonstrated recently19 that Fos expression induced via activation of AT1R underlies the inhibitory modulation of BRR by Ang II at the caudal NTS. Fos protein is also required for the re-expression of the downregulated AT1R mRNA21 in the NTS after baroreceptor activation. In addition, an elevated basal Fos expression in the NTS is associated with the reduced BRR sensitivity during hypertension.22 It follows that to ensure that Ang II may continuously inhibit BRR despite the enhanced baroreceptor afferent traffic during hypertension, the heightened Fos expression in the SHR is causatively related to an augmented re-expression of AT1R at the caudal NTS. By comparing the molecular synthesis and functional expression of AT1R and/or AT2R at the NTS elicited by baroreceptor activation and their regulation by Fos protein in SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), the present study supports this hypothesis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microinjection of Test Agents
Three 15-mer phosphorothioated c-fos oligonucleotides (Quality System, Taipei, Taiwan) were used,2224 including a key antisense oligonucleotide (ASON1) that targets against a region of the c-fos mRNA that flanks the initiation codon (5'-129 to 143-3') and a corresponding sense (SON) and a scrambled (ASON2) c-fos oligonucleotide. Each oligonucleotide was microinjected bilaterally, at a volume of 50 nL, into the NTS (n=25 to 30 animals per group) under pentobarbital anesthesia (50 mg/kg IP) 24 hours before the experimental sessions. The stereotaxic coordinates were 0.35 to 0.7 mm below the surface of the fourth ventricle and 0.5 to -0.5 mm from and 0.35 to 0.5 mm lateral to the obex. Ang II (40 pmol, n=6 to 7 animals per group) was microinjected unilaterally into the NTS before and at 15-minute intervals for 120 minutes after baroreceptor activation. Microinjection of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF, pH 7.4) served as the volume and vehicle control.
General Preparation
During the experimental session, rats were anesthetized initially with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg IP) to perform preparatory surgery. Animals received thereafter continuous intravenous infusion of pentobarbital sodium (10 to 15 mg · kg-1 · h-1), which provided satisfactory anesthetic maintenance while preserving the capacity of central cardiovascular regulation, including the BRR response.25 Pulsatile and mean systemic arterial pressure (MSAP), as well as heart rate, were recorded on a polygraph (Gould RS3400). Animals were mechanically ventilated to maintain end-tidal CO2 within 4% to 5%, as monitored by a capnograph (Datex Normocap). All data were collected from animals with a maintained rectal temperature of 37±0.5°C.
Baroreceptor Activation
The arterial baroreceptors were activated by a sustained increase in MSAP evoked by intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (100 µg/mL; Sigma) for 30 minutes (n=25 to 30 animals per group). The infusion rate was adjusted (5 to 7 µL · kg-1 · h-1) to maintain an average elevation in MSAP of 45 to 50 mm Hg.22 Intranveous infusion of saline (n=25 animals per group) served as our volume and vehicle control, and animals that received preparatory surgery and maintained under pentobarbital anesthesia served as our sham control (n=26 animals per group). In some experiments, the sensitivity of BRR control of the heart rate was evaluated by determining the slope of the linear regression line that relates reflex bradycardia to transient increase in MSAP evoked by intravenous bolus administration of phenylephrine (2.5, 5, or 10 µg/kg; n=6 to 7 animals per group).21,26
Isolation of Total RNA and Reverse TranscriptionPolymerase Chain Reaction
At the conclusion of some physiological experiments, the brain was rapidly removed on dry ice. The dorsomedial medulla (1 mm rostral to 1 mm caudal to the obex) that contains the NTS, area postrema, and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve were removed by micropunches made with a stainless steel bore (1.5 mm ID), and subject to total RNA isolation.21 Quantification of AT1R, AT2R, or GAPDH mRNA was performed by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)21,27 using primers21 obtained from Genemed Synthesis. PCR was performed at 94°C (1 minute), 58°C (1 minute), and 72°C (1 minute) for 30 cycles. This condition was determined quantitatively in initial experiments by cyclic lineage analysis28 to ascertain that amplifications of probes were within their linear ranges. Each PCR product was size-fractionated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, using a 100-bp DNA marker (New England BioLabs). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide (1 µg/mL), visualized by an ultraviolet transilluminator, and photographed. The density of each PCR band was measured and analyzed by ImageMaster VDS analysis software (Pharmacia Biotech), and the amount of mRNA products for AT1R or AT2R was expressed as the ratio to GAPDH mRNA product, which served as the internal control.
Immunohistochemical Staining
At the conclusion of other physiological experiments, free-floating sections (20 µm) of the caudal medulla oblongata were processed for immunohistochemical staining of Fos protein.2124 A rabbit polyclonal anti-Fos antiserum (sc-52, 1:4000; Santa Cruz) was used, and Fos-like immunoreactivity (Fos-LI) was visualized by a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector). As a routine, sections from both SHR and WKY that received the same treatment schedule were processed together. The criterion for identification of Fos-LI was a distinctly stained nucleus, and the number of NTS neurons that displayed Fos-LI was quantified as reported previously.2124
Double immunohistochemical staining for Fos-LI and AT1R or AT2R was processed in some experiments as described.29 In brief, sections were similarly processed for Fos-LI, using a polyclonal goat anti-Fos antiserum (sc-52G, 1:4000; Santa Cruz) and visualized by a Vectastain ABC peroxidase kit with nickel intensification. The same sections were subsequently incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-AT1R (sc-1173, 1:1000; Santa Cruz) or anti-AT2R (sc-9040, 1:1000; Santa Cruz) antiserum. Immunoreactive product was visualized by a Vectastain ABC alkaline phosphatase kit. The final immunohistochemical product of Fos-LI was stained in black; that of AT1R or AT2R, in red.
Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. One-way or 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used, as appropriate, followed by the Scheffé multiple-range test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Differential Distribution of Fos-LI and Immunoreactivity for AT1R or AT2R in NTS
Baroreceptor activation resulted in Fos expression in the commissural, medial and dorsomedial subnuclei of NTS19,2124,26,29 of SHR and WKY (Figure 2). Whereas a majority of NTS neurons that showed Fos-LI was double labeled for AT1R (Figures 2A and 2B), fewer Fos-positive neurons in the NTS were immunoreactive to AT2R (Figures 2C and 2D).
|
Effect of Antisense c-fos Oligonucleotide Pretreatment on Changes in AT1R mRNA Level in the Dorsomedial Medulla After Baroreceptor Activation
Microinjection bilaterally of c-fos ASON1 (50 pmol) into the NTS 24 hours before the experiments did not discernibly affect the basal level of AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla of SHR and WKY (Figure 3). The reduction in AT1R mRNA 30 minutes after baroreceptor activation was again comparable to aCSF control in both strains of rats. Intriguingly, c-fos ASON1 pretreatment significantly blunted the re-expression of AT1R mRNA detected 60 minutes in SHR or 90 minutes in WKY after sustained elevation in MSAP (Figure 3). There was also a trend of progressive decline in AT1R mRNA in the SHR, which approached the level in WKY.
|
As we observed previously,22 immunohistochemical analysis showed an elevated basal Fos-LI in the NTS of SHR (Table). Furthermore, sustained increase in MSAP appreciably increased the number of Fos-positive cells to comparable levels in the NTS of both strains of rats when measured 120 minutes after stimulation. Such an increase was significantly blunted by pretreatment with c-fos ASON1. The effectiveness of c-fos ASON1 to block Fos expression was also confirmed when the magnitude of BRR potentiation in SHR (60.3±5.2%, n=7 animals per group) was discernibly greater than that in WKY (47.8±3.7%, n=6 animals per group).22
|
Effect of Antisense c-fos Oligonucleotide Pretreatment on Ang IIInduced Pressor Response After Baroreceptor Activation
Microinjection unilaterally of Ang II (40 pmol) into the NTS resulted in an appreciable increase in MSAP (Figure 4). Interestingly, the magnitude of such a functional expression of AT1R21 exhibited a progressive reduction after sustained elevation in MSAP, peaking at 60 minutes and gradually returning to baseline by 120 minutes. Furthermore, although the Ang IIinduced pressor response was appreciably augmented in SHR, it also manifested greater degree of suppression after sustained increase in MSAP (SHR, -59.8±2.4%; WKY, -46.0±5.2%; n=6 to 7 animals per group). The time taken for the Ang IIinduced pressor response to return to baseline was also shorter in SHR (Figure 4).
|
Pretreatment with microinjection bilaterally of c-fos ASON1 into the NTS prevented the gradual return of Ang IIinduced pressor response that began 60 minutes after sustained elevation in MSAP in both strains of rats (Figure 4). Instead, there was a progressive reduction in the magnitude of this functional expression of AT1R,21 which was more intense in SHR.
Lack of Effect of Control c-fos Oligonucleotides
Microinjection bilaterally into the NTS of the SON or ASON2 c-fos oligonucleotide did not discernibly affect the temporal alterations in the level of AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla (Figure 3), the Ang IIinduced pressor response (Figure 4), or the increase in number of Fos-positive NTS neurons (Table) induced by baroreceptor activation in both SHR and WKY rats. In addition, pretreatment with aCSF or ASON1, SON, or ASON2 c-fos oligonucleotide did not appreciably affect the level of AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla in our sham-control animals and in SHR or WKY that received intravenous infusion of saline.
Microinjection Sites
Histological verification in randomly selected animals demonstrated that microinjection of test agents was delivered to sites distributed mainly within the anatomic confines of the NTS (Figure 5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the transcriptional level, we demonstrated that the elevated basal level of AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla14,21 of SHR plays a role during hypertension by 2 observations. First, the magnitude of maximal decline in AT1R mRNA induced after baroreceptor activation, which reached a level comparable with that in WKY, was significantly greater in SHR. Second, the re-expression of AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla after sustained hypertension, which was blunted by prior microinjection of c-fos ASON1 into the NTS, exhibited a faster time course in SHR. Fos expression evoked by baroreceptor activation is mediated via both N-methyl-D-aspartate and nonN-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the NTS.26 Glutamatergic neurotransmission at the NTS is also involved in the downregulation of AT1R mRNA after baroreceptor activation.21 Angiotensin and glutamate receptors exhibit augmented interaction in the brain of SHR,32,33 and an elevated basal Fos expression is present in the NTS during hypertension.22 A logical extension of this interplay in the NTS among glutamatergic neurotransmission, Fos protein, and AT1R during hypertension is our demonstration that transcriptional regulation of AT1R mRNA re-expression in the dorsomedial medulla by c-fos after baroreceptor activation, which is already present in WKY, is enhanced in SHR. The exact mechanism that underlies this enhanced interplay awaits further investigation.
Based on the pressor response induced by microinjection of Ang II into the NTS, we ascertained that the functional expression of AT1R21 exhibited changes, with a time delay, that paralleled alterations in AT1R mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla after sustained elevation in MSAP. Thus, the Ang IIinduced pressor response was augmented in SHR, along with greater degree of suppression after baroreceptor activation and faster rate in returning to baseline level. Of note was that the progressive reduction in the magnitude of our functional expression of AT1R was more intense in SHR on pretreatment with c-fos ASON1. These observations reinforced our contention that upregulation of AT1R mRNA by c-fos in the dorsomedial medulla after baroreceptor activation may be augmented in SHR. It should be mentioned that we have established previously21 that the suppression of pressor responses to repeated administration of Ang II into the NTS after sustained increase in MSAP is not related to tachyphylaxis.
It is interesting to note that Fos protein exerted selectively a regulation on AT1R, but not AT2R, mRNA in the dorsomedial medulla of both SHR and WKY. Activation of AT1R contributes mainly to the brain Ang IIinduced cardiovascular reponses,28 including the inhibitory modulation of BRR response via Fos expression in the caudal NTS.1719 Baroreceptor activation induces Fos expression primarily in a subpopulation of neurons in the NTS located ventromedial to the solitary tract.26,29 This subpopulation of NTS neurons is where AT1R, but not AT2R, mRNA is distributed.34 Our immunohistochemical findings further revealed that the majority of Fos-positive NTS neurons also exhibited AT1R, but not AT2R, immunoreactivity.
We are confident that the blunting effects of c-fos ASON1 on our experimental indices were related to its complementarity with c-fos mRNA because pretreatment with SON or ASON2 oligonucleotide was ineffective. In addition, microinjection bilaterally into the NTS of aCSF, ASON1, SON, or ASON2 c-fos oligonucleotide did not elicit discernible changes in the level of AT1R mRNA in SHR or WKY that received intravenous infusion of saline. This confirmed that our results obtained after sustained increase in MSAP were not caused by fluid loading in the circulatory system. The concern for the confounding influence of pentobarbital sodium is also minimized because we previously demonstrated25 that our scheme of anesthetic management provided stable anesthesia and preserved the capacity of central cardiovascular regulation. The lack of discernible changes in AT1R mRNA in sham-control animals further attested that anesthesia was not a confounding factor.
In conclusion, the present study showed that the upregulation of AT1R re-expression at the NTS by Fos protein after sustained hypertension is further augmented, at both transcriptional and functional levels, in SHR.
Perspectives
A hallmark of hypertension is depressed BRR response,813 which may result from the inhibitory action on this reflex by the exaggerated angiotensinergic neurotransmission at the NTS.31 At the same time, Fos expression induced via activation of AT1R underlies the inhibitory modulation of BRR by Ang II at the caudal NTS.19 As a prelude to hypertension, we demonstrated that Fos expression, which is responsible for the augmented re-expression of AT1R at the caudal NTS, is heightened in the SHR to ensure that Ang II may continuously exert long-term inhibitory modulation on BRR, despite the enhanced baroreceptor afferent traffic during hypertension. This chain of intracellular events offers a logical explanation to our recent demonstration35 that downregulation of basal Fos expression in NTS contributes to the restoration of BRR sensitivity in SHR that received antihypertensive treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 22, 2002; first decision March 7, 2002; accepted July 1, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sasson-Corsi P, Lamph WW, Kamps M, Verma IM. Fos associated p39 is related to nuclear transcription factor AP-1. Cell. 1988; 54: 553560.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Herzig TC, Jobe SM, Aoki H, Molkentin JD, Cowley AW, Izumo S, Markham BE. Angiotensin II type 1a receptor gene expression in the heart: AP-1 and GATA-4 participate in the response to pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 75437548.
4. Kobayashi SI, Ohnishi J, Nibu Y, Nishimatsu SI, Umemura S, Ishii M, Murakami K, Miyazaki H. Cloning of the rat angiotensin type 2 receptor gene and identification of its functional promoter region. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1995; 1262: 155158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Murphy TJ, Alexander RW, Griendling KK, Runge MS, Bernstein KE. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Nature. 1991; 351: 233236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Timmermans PBMWM, Wong PC, Chiu AT, Herblin WF, Benfield P, Carini DJ, Lee RJ, Wexler RR, Saye JAM, Smith RD. Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin 11 receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev. 1993; 45: 205251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Spyer KM. Central nervous mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular control. J Physiol. 1994; 474: 119.
8. Pitzalis MV, Passantino A, Massari F, Forleo C, Balducci C, Santoro G, Mastropasqua F, Antonelli G, Rizzon P. Diastolic dysfunction and baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 11411145.
9. Tank J, Jordan J, Diedrich A, Stoffels M, Franke G, Faulhaber HD, Luft FC, Busjahn A. Genetic influences on baroreflex function in normal twins. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 907910.
10. Ono A, Kuwaki T, Kumada M, Fujita T. Differential central modulation of baroreflex by salt loading in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 808814.
11. Lantelme P, Cerutti C, Lo M, Paultre CZ, Ducher M. Mechanisms of spontaneous baroreflex impairment in lyon hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: R920R925.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Berenguer LM, Garcia-Estan J, Ubeda M, Ortiz AJ, Quesada T. Role of renin-angiotensin system in the impairment of baroreflex control of heart rate in renal hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991; 9: 11271133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Bissoli NS, Cicilini MA, Vasquez EC, Cabral AM. The diuretic chlorthalidone normalizes baroreceptors and Bezold-Jarisch reflexes in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Pharmacol Res. 2000; 41: 483491.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Raizada MK, Sumners C, Lu D. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor mRNA levels in the brains of normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Neurochem. 1993; 60: 19491952.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Healy DP, Zhang N. Angiotensin II receptors in the solitary-vagal area of hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1992; 19: 355361.
16. Toney GM, Porter JP. Effects of blockade of AT1 and AT2 receptors in brain on the central angiotensin II pressor response in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuropharmacology. 1993; 32: 581589.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Luoh HF, Chan SHH. Participation of AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes in the tonic inhibitory modulation of baroreceptor reflex response by endogenous angiotensins at the nucleus tractus solitarii in the rat. Brain Res. 1998; 782: 7382.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Matsumura K, Averill DR, Ferrario CM. Angiotensin II acts at AT1 receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract to attenuate the baroreceptor reflex. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: Rl611R1619.
19. Luoh SHF, Chan SHH. Inhibition of baroreflex by angiotensin II via Fos expression in nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. Hypertension.;. 2001; 38: 130135.
20. Ciriello J. Brainstem projections of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1983; 36: 3742.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wang LL, Chan SHH, Chan JYH. Fos protein is required for the re-expression of angiotensin type I receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarii after baroreceptor activation in the rat, Neuroscience. 2001; 103: 143151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Chan JYH, Chen WC, Lee HY, Chan SHH. Elevated Fos expression in the nucleus tractus solitarii is associated with reduced baroreflex response in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 939944.
23. Shih CD, Chan SHH, Chan JYH. Participation of Fos protein at the nucleus tractus solitarius in inhibitory modulation of baroreceptor reflex response in the rat. Brain Res. 1996; 738: 3947.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Chan JYH, Shih CD, Chan SHH. Enhancement of spontaneous baroreflex by antisense c-fos oligonucleotide treatment in the NTS of the rat. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: H2200H2208.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Yang CCH, Kuo TBJ, Chan SHH. Auto- and cross-spectral analysis of cardiovascular fluctuations during pentobarbital anesthesia in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: H575H582.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Chan JYH, Yang SM Chan SHH. Mediation by N-methyl-D-aspartate and nonN methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the expression of Fos protein at the nucleus tractus solitarii in response to baroreceptor activation in the rat. Neuroscience. 1998; 83: 93105.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Haywood GA, Gullestad L, Katsuya T, Hutchinson HG, Pratt RE, Horiuchi M, Fowler MB. AT1 and AT2 angiotensin receptor gene expression in human heart failure. Circulation. 1997; 95: 12021206.
28. Lu D, Raizada MK. Delivery of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antisense inhibits angiotensin action in neurons from hypertensive rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 29142918.
29. Yen JC, Chan JYH, Chan SHH. Differential roles of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in synaptic responses of neurons in nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81: 30343043.
30. Raizada MK, Francis SC, Wang H, Gelband CH, Reaves PY, Katovich MJ. Targeting of the renin-angiotensin system by antisense gene therapy: a possible strategy for the long-term control of hypertension. J Hyperten. 2000; 18: 353362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Tseng CJ, Appalsamy M, Robertson D. Cardiovascular effects of microinjection of angiotensin II into the brainstem of renal hypertensive rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990; 255: 374381.
32. Phillips MI. Gene therapy for hypertension. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 543548.
33. Xu Z, Lane JM, Zhu B, Herbert J. Dizocilpine maleate, an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, inhibits dipsogenic responses and c-Fos expression induced by intracerebral injection of angiotensin II. Neuroscience. 1997: 78: 203214.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lenkei Z, Palkovits M, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Expression of angiotensin type-1 (AT1) and type-2 (AT2) receptor mRNA in the adult brain: a functional neuroanatomical review. Prog Neuroendocrinol. 1997; 18: 383439.
35. Chan SHH, Chao YM, Tseng CJ, Chan JYH. Down-regulation of basal Fos expression at nucleus tractus solitarii underlies restoration of baroreflex response after antihypertensive treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience. 2002; 112: 113120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. H. Zucker, H. D. Schultz, K. P. Patel, W. Wang, and L. Gao Regulation of central angiotensin type 1 receptors and sympathetic outflow in heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): H1557 - H1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Liu, L. Gao, S. K. Roy, K. G. Cornish, and I. H. Zucker Role of Oxidant Stress on AT1 Receptor Expression in Neurons of Rabbits With Heart Failure and in Cultured Neurons Circ. Res., July 18, 2008; 103(2): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Cunningham, M. Herrera-Rosales, M. A. Martinez, and S. Mifflin Identification of Active Central Nervous System Sites in Renal Wrap Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 653 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. H. Zucker Novel Mechanisms of Sympathetic Regulation in Chronic Heart Failure Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1005 - 1011. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. H. Chan, K.-F. Chang, C.-C. Ou, and J. Y. H. Chan Nitric Oxide Regulates c-fos Expression in Nucleus Tractus Solitarii Induced by Baroreceptor Activation via cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase and cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein Phosphorylation Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2004; 65(2): 319 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y.H. Chan, L.-L. Wang, C.-C. Ou, and S. H.H. Chan Downregulation of Angiotensin Subtype 1 Receptor in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla During Endotoxemia Hypertension, July 1, 2003; 42(1): 103 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |