| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2002;40:619.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University (N.J.S., D.F., B.T.), Cleveland, Ohio; The Program for Population Genetics and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University School of Public Health (N.J.S.), Boston, Mass; The Jackson Laboratory (N.J.S.), Bar Harbor, Maine; and Hypertension Research Center (J.P.G., L.Z., A.A.) and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics (H.J.), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark. Dr Fallin is now at the Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Dr Schork is now at the Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego.
Correspondence to Abraham Aviv, MD, Room F-464, MSB, Hypertension Research Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail avivab{at}umdnj.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: oxidative stress ion transport lymphocytes glutathione intermediate phenotype
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we describe a novel strategy for dissecting the genetic basis of the SLC by shielding it from influences owing to different environmental conditions that exist in vivo, and by taking advantage of the vast amount of publicly available genotype data. We accomplished this by studying the SLC in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-immortalized lymphoblasts of large reference Center dEtude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) pedigrees. The CEPH collection provides a considerable advantage in that extensive genotype data are already available for some of the pedigrees in the CEPH (http://landru.cephb.fr) and the companion Coriell Cell Repositories (http://locus.umdnj.edu/nigms/ceph/ceph.html). By screening cell lines from CEPH pedigrees for variations in the SLC, we were able to rapidly use this enormous amount of genotype data.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Culture of EBV-Transformed Lymphoblasts
Lymphoblast cell lines from the 5 CEPH pedigrees were cultured under identical conditions in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/L streptomycin, and 15% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Irvine Scientific). Cells used for experiments were derived from fresh cultures thawed from frozen stocks. Cells were passaged 2 or 3 times per week, and cell density was maintained between 0.5x106 and 1x106 cells/mL. Cell numbers were determined with a Coulter Counter ZM. Cells were routinely monitored for mycoplasma contamination with the Mycotrim Triphasic Culture System (Irvine Scientific). In preparation for experiments, 2x107 to 5x107 cells (2.0x106/mL) were suspended for 24 hours in fresh culture medium containing 0.5% FBS.
Measurements of SLC Activity
Lymphoblasts (5x107 cells) were centrifuged at 250g for 10 minutes and resuspended in 15 mL of room-temperature wash solution (WS) comprised of (in mmol/L) 75 MgCl2, 95 sucrose, 10 MOPS/Tris (pH 7.4), and 0.1 ouabain. The cell pellet was gently overlayed with WS and decanted, and cells were resuspended for 3 hours at 37°C with LiCl loading solution (LS) comprised of 150 mmol/L LiCl, 10 mmol/L MOPS/Tris (pH 7.4), and 10 mmol/L glucose. The pellet was washed 1 additional time in ice-cold WS, and cells were aliquotted to 0.5 mL microfuge tubes (2x106 to 4x106/100 µL) for measurements of Li+ efflux and cell number. Li+ efflux was measured in cells suspended for 0 to 15 minutes in efflux solution (ES) at 37°C containing (in mmol/L) 10 MOPS/Tris (pH 7.4), 10 glucose, 0.1 ouabain, and either 150 NaCl (Na+-containing ES) or 75 MgCl2 and 75 sucrose (Na+-free ES). At different time intervals, cells were rapidly pelleted in a microfuge, and the supernatant was collected.
Li+ was determined in diluted supernatant fractions with a Perkin-Elmer atomic absorption spectrophotometer using Perkin-Elmer standards for Li+ (made up in Na+-free or Na+-containing ES). Under the above conditions, Li+ efflux was apparently linear in both ESs for at least 15 minutes. We note that the Na+-dependent Li+ efflux was not affected by 1 mmol/L amiloride or 10 µmol/L bumetanide (data not shown). The slope of Li+ efflux in Na+-free ES was subtracted from that in Na+-containing ES; Li+ efflux was expressed in nmol Li+/Lx(106 cellsxmin)-1 (see Figure 2 for an example). SLC phenotype measurements were performed in duplicate on 3 separate occasions separated by 10- to 14-day intervals. In addition, SLC activity was measured in separate set of experiments examining thiol group alkylation with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). This agent was added for the last 15 minutes of the LiCl loading period. All chemicals were from Sigma.
|
Statistical Methods
Two analytic strategies relating variation at the 7746 marker loci to the SLC phenotype were pursued. The first analytic strategy involved testing each marker individually for association with SLC by use of the quantitative transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) outlined by Xiong et al.18 Both the allele-specific and the omnibus, or overall-locus effect, tests were pursued. These statistics follow a
2 distribution asymptotically, with degrees of freedom given by the number of alleles tested minus 1. To make the statistics comparable, given that the loci varied considerably with respect to the number of alleles that could be tested, we standardized each test statistic by subtracting the degrees of freedom and dividing by the square root of twice the degrees of freedom. The probabilistic or statistical significance of resulting test statistics was assessed via genome-wide and chromosome-specific permutation tests.19
To implement these tests, SLC values were randomly assigned to the CEPH pedigree members, and marker-specific tests were recomputed. Test statistics were then tallied and used to estimate genome-wide and chromosome-specific test-statistic distributions under the null hypothesis of no marker-SLC association. Chromosome-specific critical values were estimated in addition to genome-wide critical values, because (1) there was an unequal number of markers on each chromosome; (2) nonuniform distances exist between the markers in the map; (3) genomic regions display wide variation in disequilibrium strength20,21; and (4) a recent study by Huttley et al22 suggested that relatively large groups of STRs exhibit long-range linkage disequilibrium in certain parts of the genome. These facts suggest that the correlations between test statistics may be radically different for different chromosomes and, hence, require different critical values for interpreting the statistical significance of associations involving loci on them. These distributions were then used to assess the probability of obtaining test statistics as large as those observed with the actual data.
The second analytic strategy involved multipoint linkage analyses. We performed these analyses using the SIBPAL module in the SAGE computer package.23 Statistical significance of linkage was determined using the W2 test statistic and the criteria for linkage established by Lander and Kruglyak,24 in which scores with P<2.2x10-5 were used as the minimum threshold values for a significant linkage.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Figure 3 depicts standardized TDT statistic values for associations (solid red line, left axis) and W2 test statistics for linkage (dashed black line, right axis) with the SLC per locus location for 22 chromosomes. For the association analysis, standardized test statistic values of 2.95 and 6.29 were estimated from permutation studies to represent genome-wide critical values for type 1 error rates of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively; chromosome-specific critical values at 0.01 significance are indicated by the blue dashed lines (Figure 3). With these critical values in mind, the plots in Figure 3 suggest that a number of genomic regions are likely to harbor alleles that influence SLC activity.
|
It is noteworthy that for the association analysis, there is considerable build-up and decay in test-statistic values surrounding markers producing the largest test statistic values. This is undoubtedly owing to the ability of the TDT construction to detect linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and direct association effects, even in the face of overt genetic stratification between the families studied.26 The results of the multipoint linkage analysis supports this claim, because the "contour" of the test statistics from the linkage results generally follows the contour of the quantitative TDT test. One notable exception occurs on chromosome 16, in which a statistically significant linkage was observed, although the TDT analysis did not reveal association. This result is probably owing to the unique properties of multipoint analysis, through which linkage from marker information is derived over an entire genomic region. Given an insufficient density of markers in a region for linkage disequilibrium-induced associations to emerge, traditional multipoint analysis can detect linkages in those regions that omnibus TDT association tests cannot.
Table 1 provides an overview of the results, listing the number of markers studied. The markers show the greatest evidence for association with the SLC, and chromosome-specific 1% critical values derived from chromosome-specific permutation studies. For chromosomes with no markers producing a test statistic significant at the genome-wide 1% level, the marker producing the largest test statistic is listed.
|
In addition to computing overall or omnibus tests of associations for all loci, we tested each allele at each locus individually. We also computed the fraction of meioses informative for each locus as a measure of the utility of each marker for a TDT analysis (ie, we tallied the fraction of heterozygous parents and offspring with genotypes at each locus). The upper panel of Figure 4 displays a plot of the test statistics for the allele giving the greatest evidence for association for each locus against locus location on chromosome 14. The lower panel of Figure 4 displays a plot of the fraction of informative meioses for each locus against locus location for chromosome 14. Similar plots were made for the other chromosomes (data not shown). Chromosome 14 was randomly chosen to showcase the results.
|
To further assess the statistical significance of the test statistic results, we pursued the graphical device described by Schweder and Spjotvoll.27 Figure 5 provides a plot of the observed probability values for the standardized omnibus statistic subtracted from 1 (ie, 1-p) against the number of the 1-probability values less than that value. If all null hypotheses are true (ie, each locus does not harbor alleles associated with SLC values), this plot should reveal a straight line. The inflection of the curve at 1-probability values near 1.0 in Figure 5 suggests that some null hypotheses are not true, and there is therefore statistical evidence for association of alleles at these loci with SLC values. The length of the small line segment jutting away from the otherwise straight diagonal line is an estimate of the fraction of null hypotheses that should be rejected. Thus, based on Figure 5,
10% of the test statistics should lead to a rejection of the null hypothesis. This relatively large percentage of null hypotheses that should be rejected on a purely statistical basis probably reflects linkage and linkage disequilibrium effects of test statistics computed at loci in the vicinity of loci exhibiting the largest test statistic values.
|
As a check on how compelling the associations are for those loci producing very large TDT values, we examined the actual SLC activity values of individuals transmitted and not transmitted particular alleles at different loci. As examples, Figure 6 plots SLC activity values for those transmitted a particular allele at marker locus D12S165 (top panel) and marker locus D6S436 (bottom panel) versus those not transmitted a particular allele. These 2 loci were chosen for the plots because they had alleles for which many of the families were informative and which exhibited striking associations with SLC values. Figure 6 was constructed in such a way that the 5 families are depicted in order under the transmitted (T) and untransmitted (U) columns. Thus, it can be seen that there is fairly consistent association of a particular allele at these 2 loci and SLC activity values within the 5 families, suggesting that, at least for these loci, the associations are not owing to a single family with large differences between offspring transmitted and not transmitted at a particular allele.
|
Table 2 offers a list of candidate genes near the markers showing the greatest evidence of association with the SLC using public domain databases and resources (ie, National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI] Web pages, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The results reveal loci associated with the SLC near STRs on different chromosomes that contain genes engage in glutathione metabolism. These include
-Glu-Cys synthetase, several forms of glutathione S-tranferases (GSTs), and thioreductase-dependent peroxide reductase. Other regions near STRs showing evidence for association include a region of chromosome 4 that is syntenic with a region on baboon chromosome 5, demonstrating strong linkage with the SLC in the baboon,30 and the angiotensinogen locus. For angiotensinogen, the chromosome 1 location (ie, 2.55 cM from marker D1S1670) corresponds to a peak association test statistic of 54.7 at location 245.05 cM. In addition, associations with the SLC were observed for loci containing the regulatory unit of protein phosphatase 2, protein tyrosine kinase, calmodulin, and 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase (data not shown).
|
For the region on chromosome 16, showing a significant linkage without a pronounced association signal, there exist other candidate genes. These include cholesterol ester transfer protein, solute carrier family 12 Na/Cl transporter (SLC12A3), and a protein similar to cytoskeletal-type tropomyosin (TM30-NM; LOC 93404). In addition, a linkage study using systolic blood pressure as a phenotype for low concordant, hypertensive sib pairs31 identified a region on chromosome 16 (D16S3396) having a LOD-score >2.0. This region surrounds the marker showing peak linkage (marker GATA22F09) at 71.77 cM.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It must be noted that pedigree 102 is of Venezuelan origin, in contrast to the Utah origin of the other 4 pedigrees. It is possible that genetic determinants of the SLC may differ across racial groupsa phenomenon that may confound the observations made in the present study. One must also carefully consider the matters of the effect of immortalization on SLC parameters and the considerable number of significant associations with the SLC that were identified in our study. Immortalization and the in vitro state may modify characteristics of the SLC. The insensitivity of the Na+-dependent Li+ transport in immortalized lymphoblasts to ouabain, amiloride, and bumetanide and its modification by NEM suggest, however, that mechanistically, the SLC in these cells is similar to the SLC in erythrocytes.
Because immortalization and growth conditions were the same for all the lymphoblastic cell lines we examined, variations in SLC activity among the cell lines could only arise from genetic factors intrinsic to these cells. With regard to these genetic factors, the SLC has been characterized as a phenotype of essential hypertensiona complex genetic trait. It is only reasonable to assume therefore that multiple genetic determinants are involved in the regulation of the SLC. The relatively large number of association of autosomal markers with the SLC may reflect this premise and the fact that our analysis has used an enormous number of these markers. No doubt, a subset of these associations may be artifactual, but one cannot ignore the fact that some of these associations point to loci on different chromosomes harboring genes that show common mechanisms involved not only in the biology of the SLC but also in the pathobiology of essential hypertension.
Perspectives
Enzymes involved in the metabolism of glutathione are important for the defense against oxidative stress and contribute to maintenance of cellular redox state.37,38 Variations in the activities of these enzymes may thus explain the sexual dimorphisms and race-related differences in the activity of the erythrocyte SLC. The lower SLC activity in erythrocytes in women than in men and in blacks than in whites1012,14,15 may be explained by gender- and race-related levels of oxidative stress in these cells, as plasma hydrogen peroxide production is lower in women than in men and in blacks than in whites.39 Recent studies suggest that reactive oxygen species are centrally involved in the pathophysiology of hypertension in laboratory animals and in human beings.40,41 For instance, increased levels of reactive oxygen species are found in rats with genetic hypertension and experimentally induced hypertension.4247 Of interest are findings that glutathione levels are reduced in vascular smooth muscle cells of spontaneously hypertensive rats44 and that glutathione depletion increases oxidative stress and causes severe hypertension in normal rats.45 Moreover, low serum levels of glutathione entail an increase in coronary heart disease risk in humans.4850 Thus, association and linkage findings of SLC in immortalized lymphoblasts with genes engaged in glutathione metabolism may not be incidental, because SLC activity in erythrocytes correlates with a host of risk factors for coronary heart diseases that include not only essential hypertension but also insulin resistance and dyslipidemia.69 Further, a recent study has found an increase in reactive oxygen species production in immortalized lymphoblasts from patients with essential hypertension,51 in line with our observations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 18, 2002; first decision July 20, 2002; accepted August 30, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Mead P, Wilkinson R, Thomas TH. Thiol protein defect in sodium-lithium countertransport in subset of essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 12751280.
3. Orlov SN, Kuznetsov SR, Podudin NI, Tremblay J, Hamet P. Can we use erythrocytes for the study of the activity of the ubiquitous Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE-1) in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998; 11: 774783.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Dudley CR, Giuffra LA, Raine AE, Reeders ST. Assessing the role of APNH, a gene encoding for a human amiloride-sensitive Na+/H+ antiporter, on the interindividual variation in red cell Na+/Li+ countertransport. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1991; 4: 937943.
5. Lifton R, Hunt SC, Williams RR, Pouyssegur J, Lalouel JM. Exclusion of the Na+-H+ antiporter as a candidate gene in human essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1991; 17: 814.
6. Giordano M, Castellino P, Solini A, Canessa ML, DeFronzo RA. Na+/Li+, and Na+/H+ countertransport activity in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients: role of insulin resistance and hypertensive treatment. Metabolism. 1997; 46: 13161323.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, Valent M, De Mattia G, Santucci A, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Relationship between insulin resistance and nonmodulating hypertension: link of metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes. 1999; 48: 16231630.[Abstract]
8. Hunt SC, Williams RR, Smith JB, Ash KO. Associations of three erythrocyte cation transport systems with plasma lipids in Utah subjects. Hypertension. 1986; 8: 3036.
9. Carr SJ, Thomas TH, Laker MF, and Wilkinson R. Elevated sodium-lithium countertransport: a familial marker of hyperlipidaemia and hypertension? J Hypertens. 1990; 8: 139146.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Weder AB, Torretti BA, Julius S. Racial differences in erythrocyte cation transport. Hypertension. 1984; 6: 115123.
11. Smith JB, Wade MB, Fineberg NS, Weinberger MH. Influence of race, sex, and blood pressure on erythrocyte sodium transport in humans. Hypertension. 1988; 12: 251258.
12. Trevisan M, Ostrow D, Cooper RS, Sempos C, Stamler J. Sex and race differences in sodium-lithium countertransport and red cell sodium concentration. Am J Epidemiol. 1984; 120: 537541.
13. Aviv A, Lasker N. Proposed deflects in membrane transport and intracellular ions as pathogenic factors in essential hypertension.In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York: Raven Press; 1990: 923937.
14. Rebbeck TR, Turner ST, Michels VV, Moll PP. Genetic and environmental explanations for the distribution of sodium-lithium countertransport in pedigrees from Rochester, Minn. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 48: 109104.
15. Orlov SN, Pausova Z, Gossard F, Gaudet D, Tremblay J, Kotchen T, Cowley A, Larochelle P, Hamet P. Sibling resemblance in erythrocyte ion transporters in French-Canadian sibling pairs affected with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 18591865.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Cirillo M, Laurenzi M, Panarelli W, Trevisan M, Stamler J. Prospective analysis of traits related to 6-year change in sodium-lithium countertransport. Gubbio Popul Study Res Group Hypertens. 1999; 33: 887893.
17. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 63: 861869.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Xiong MM, Kruskall J, Boerwinkle E. TDT statistics for mapping quantitative trait loci. Ann Hum Genetics. 1998; 62: 431452.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Good P. Permutation Tests. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994.
20. Nickerson DA, Taylor SL, Weiss KM, Clark AG, Hutchinson RG, Stengard J, Salomaa V, Vartiainen E, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF. DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Nat Genetics. 1998; 19: 233245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ardlie K, Liu-Cordero SN, Eberle MA, Daly M, Barrett J, Winchester E, Lander ES, Kruglyak L, Lower-than-expected linkage disequilibrium between tightly linked markers in humans suggests a role for gene conversion. Am J Hum Genetics. 2001; 69: 582589.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Huttley GA, Smith MW, Carrington M, OBrien SJ. A scan for linkage disequilibrium across the human genome. Genetics. 1998; 152: 17111722.
23. Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology. Cleveland, Ohio: Department of Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University; 1996.
24. Lander ES, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genetics. 1995; 11: 241247.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Zerbini G, Mangili R, Gabellini D, Pozza G. Modes of operation of an electroneutral Na+/Li+ countertransport in human skin fibroblasts. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: C1373C1379.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association. Am J Hum Genetics. 1996; 59: 983989.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Schweder T, Spjotvoll E. Plots of P-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika. 1982; 69: 493502.
28. Webb G, Vaska V, Goggan M, Board P. Chromosomal localization of the gene for the human
-class glutathione transferase (GSTT1). Genomics. 1996; 33: 121123.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Coggan M, Whitbread L, Whittington A, Board P. Structure and organization of the human
-class glutathione S-transferase and D-dopachrome tautomerase gene complex. Biochem J. 1998; 334: 617623.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kammerer CM, Cox LA, Mahaney MC, Royer J, Shadie RE. Sodium lithium countertransport activity is linked to chromosome 5 in the baboon. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 398402.
31. Xu X, Rogus JJ, Terwedow HA, Yang J, Wang Z, Chen C, Niu T, Wang B, Xu H, Weiss S, Schork NJ, Fang Z. An extreme-sib-pair genome scan for genes regulating blood pressure. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64: 16941701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Levy R, Livne A, Erythrocyte Li-Na countertransport system. Inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide probes for a conformational change of the transport system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984; 777: 157166.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Thomas TH, West IC, Wilkinson R. Modification of erythrocyte Na+/Li+ countertransport kinetics by two types of thiol group. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995; 1235: 317322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Rutherford PA, Thomas TH, OKelly J, West IC, Wilkinson R. Thiol group control of sodium-lithium countertransport kinetics in uraemia: evidence of a membrane abnormality affected by haemodialysis. Nephron. 1996; 72: 184188.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Thomas TH, Rutherford PA, West IC, Wilkinson R. Sulfhydryl group control of sodium-lithium countertransport kinetics: a membrane protein control abnormality in essential hypertension. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995; 25: 235240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Watkins SL, West IC, Wilkinson R, Thomas TH. Abnormal thiol reactivity of tropomyosin in essential hypertension and its association with abnormal sodium-lithium countertransport kinetics. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 485493.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Jakoby WB, Ziegler DM. The enzymes of detoxication. J Biol Chem. 2001; 265: 2071520718.
38. Hayes JD, Strange RC. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and their biological consequences. Pharmacology. 2000; 61: 154166.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lacy F, Kailasam MT, OConnor DT, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Parmer RJ. Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in human essential hypertension: role of heredity, gender, and ethnicity. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 878884.
40. Griendling KK, Sorescu D, Ushio-Fukai M. NAD(P)H oxidase role in cardiovascular biology and disease. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 494501.
41. Dzau VJ. Tissue angiotensin and pathobiology of vascular disease: a unifying hypothesis. Hypertension. 2000; 37: 10471052.
42. Lacy F, OConnor DT, Schmid-Schonbein GW. Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in hypertensives and normotensive subjects at genetic risk of hypertension. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 291303.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Vaziri ND, Ni Z, Oveisi F, Trnavsky-Hobbs DL. Effect of antioxidant therapy on blood pressure and NO synthase expression in hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 957964.
44. Wu L, Juurlink BH. The impaired glutathione system and its up-regulation by sulforaphane in vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 18191825.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Vaziri ND, Wang XQ, Oveisi F, Rad B. Induction of oxidative stress by glutathione depletion causes severe hypertension in normal rats. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 142146.
46. Suzuki H, Swei A, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schonbein GW. In vivo evidence for microvascular oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats: hydroethidine microfluorography. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 10831089.
47. Ortiz MC, Manriquez MC, Romero JC, Juncos LA. Antioxidants block angiotensin II-induced increases in blood pressure and endothelin. Hypertension. 2001; 38 (3 pt 2): 655659.
48. Morrison JA, Jacobsen DW, Sprecher DL, Robsinson K, Khoury P, Daniels SR. Serum glutathione in adolescent males predicts parental coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1999; 100: 22442247.
49. Gu M, Love H, Schofield D, Turkie W, Odom H, Braganza JM. A pilot study of blood antioxidant and free radical marker profiles in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. Clin Chim Acta. 1996; 252: 182195.
50. Bridges AB, Scott NA, Pringle TH, McNeill GP, Belch JJ. Relationship between the extent of coronary artery disease and indicators of free radical activity. Clin Cardiol. 1992; 15: 169174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Pettit AI, Wong RKM, Lee V, Jennings S, Quinn PA, Ng LL. Increased free radical production in hypertension due to increased expression of the NADPH oxidase subunit p22phox in lymphoblast cell lines. J Hypertens. 2002; 20: 677683.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kazadi, C. Loeuillet, S. Deutsch, A. Ciuffi, M. Munoz, J. S. Beckmann, D. Moradpour, S. E. Antonarakis, and A. Telenti Genomic determinants of the efficiency of internal ribosomal entry sites of viral and cellular origin Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2008; 36(21): 6918 - 6925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, F. Rao, J. L. Rodriguez-Flores, M. Mahata, M. M. Fung, M. Stridsberg, S. M. Vaingankar, G. Wen, R. M. Salem, M. Das, et al. Naturally Occurring Human Genetic Variation in the 3'-Untranslated Region of the Secretory Protein Chromogranin A Is Associated With Autonomic Blood Pressure Regulation and Hypertension in a Sex-Dependent Fashion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 28, 2008; 52(18): 1468 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Xiang, M. Feng, S. Muend, and R. Rao A human Na+/H+ antiporter sharing evolutionary origins with bacterial NhaA may be a candidate gene for essential hypertension PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18677 - 18681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Walgren, M. A. Meucci, and H. L. McLeod Pharmacogenomic Discovery Approaches: Will the Real Genes Please Stand Up? J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2005; 23(29): 7342 - 7349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Watters, A. Kraja, M. A. Meucci, M. A. Province, and H. L. McLeod Genome-wide discovery of loci influencing chemotherapy cytotoxicity PNAS, August 10, 2004; 101(32): 11809 - 11814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Greenwood, P. E. Cadman, M. Stridsberg, S. Nguyen, L. Taupenot, N. J. Schork, and D. T. O'Connor Genome-wide linkage analysis of chromogranin B expression in the CEPH pedigrees: implications for exocytotic sympathochromaffin secretion in humans Physiol Genomics, June 17, 2004; 18(1): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |