(Hypertension. 2003;41:37.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the German Institute of Human Nutrition (M.B., F.A., S.K.), Potsdam, Germany; Franz-Volhard Clinical Research Center and HELIOS Klinikum Berlin, Medical Faculty of the Charité, Humboldt-University (J.J., J.T., G.F., M.S., A.M.S., F.C.L.), Berlin, Germany; and the Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen (N.-J.C.), Denmark.
Correspondence to Dr Michael Boschmann, German Institute for Human Nutrition, Department of Biochemistry and Physiology of Nutrition, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114116, 14558 Bergholz-Rehbrücke, Germany. E-mail boschman{at}mail.dife.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: glucose lactates angiotensin II microcirculation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microdialysis
After an overnight fast, two microdialysis catheters each (distance, 2.5 cm) were inserted into abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (adipose) at the level of the umbilicus and into skeletal muscle (quadriceps femoris, vastus lateralis). Details of that technique are described elsewhere.11,12 Before insertion of the catheters, a local anesthetic (lidocaine) was given, either as a cream for adipose (EMLA, Astra GmbH) or as a subcutaneous injection for muscle (Xylocitin 1%, Jenapharm GmbH). After insertion of the probes, tissue perfusion was started at a flow rate of 2 µL/min with Ringers solution (Serumwerk Bernburg AG). The solution was supplemented with 50 mmol/L ethanol (EtOH, B. Braun Melsungen AG) and 100 µmol/L of either NG-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME, effective in blocking NO synthase, NOS) or the D-isomer (D-NAME, ineffective in blocking NOS). CMA/60 microdialysis catheters and CMA/102 microdialysis pumps (both from CMA Microdialysis AB) were used. A period of 60 minutes was allowed for recovery of the tissues from insertional trauma and for baseline calibration of the perfusion system before commencement of the dialysis protocol. After the baseline perfusion was completed, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µmol/l Ang II was added successively to the perfusion medium for testing the dose-response relation of Ang II on baseline blood flow and dialysate glycerol, glucose, and lactate concentrations. In a final perfusion step, the NO-donor nitroprusside (NP) was added to the highest Ang II concentration. Ang II and L- and D-NAME were purchased from Clinalfa and NP (Nipruss) from Schwarz Pharma AG. During each perfusion step, three 15-minute fractions of dialysates were collected and frozen at -80°C until analyses were performed.
Analyses
Ethanol concentration in the perfusate (inflow) and dialysate (outflow) was measured with a standard enzymatic assay.13 Dialysate concentrations of glycerol, glucose, lactate, and pyruvate were measured on a CMA/600 analyzer (CMA Microdialysis AB). Samples for norepinephrine were processed and analyzed as previously described.14
Calculations and Statistics
Changes in blood flow were determined by using the ethanol dilution technique, which is based on the Fick principle.15,16 Accordingly, a decrease in the outflow/inflow ratio is equivalent to an increase in blood flow and vice versa. For simplicity, the term ethanol ratio is substituted for the term ethanol outflow/inflow ratio. Changes in glycerol were used to assess changes in lipolysis and/or lipid mobilization; changes in glucose, lactate, and pyruvate were used to assess changes in carbohydrate metabolism.17,18 In situ recovery for glycerol, glucose, lactate, and pyruvate in the dialysate was assessed by near-equilibrium dialysis.19 For all four metabolites, we found recoveries of
30% in adipose tissue and 50% in muscle. All data are given as mean±SEM. Statistical analyses were carried out by ANOVA with repeated measures, with pretreatment with L- or D-NAME and concentration of Ang II used as factors to determine the significance of differences in the hemodynamic and metabolic responses to Ang II either in the presence or absence of NOS blockade. For testing, a statistical program (InStat, Version 3.0, Graphpad Software Inc) was used. Significant F ratios from the ANOVA were followed by post hoc comparisons among means by use of the Bonferroni correction.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a subset of experiments it was tested whether D-NAME, the isoform ineffective for blocking NOS, could elicit any unspecific effects on tissue blood flow and metabolism. Compared with baseline values in the absence of D-NAME, the presence of D-NAME in the perfusate did not influence ethanol ratio and dialysate concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glycerol (data not shown). Therefore, in the following, all baseline values in the presence of D-NAME can be considered as control values.
Blood Flow
Baseline ethanol ratio was
0.30 and 0.08 in adipose tissue and muscle, respectively, without any significant differences between L- and D-NAME (Figure 1). Ang II did not result in any significant change in ethanol ratio in both tissues, neither with L- nor with D-NAME. Final addition of NP to the medium induced a significant decrease in ethanol ratio down to
0.15 and 0.04 in adipose tissue and muscle, respectively (Figure 1).
|
Metabolites
Baseline dialysate concentration of glucose was
0.96 and 1.90 mmol/L, whereas that of lactate was
0.55 and 0.95 mmol/L in adipose tissue and muscle, respectively (L-NAME=D-NAME). There were no significant changes in the concentrations of glucose and lactate during Ang II perfusion, either in adipose tissue or in muscle (Figure 1). However, dialysate glucose concentration increased significantly to
1.7 mmol/L in adipose tissue and 2.6 mmol/L in muscle after NP administration (Figure 1). In both tissues, dialysate lactate concentration was not affected by NP (Figure 1). The response of dialysate glycerol to Ang II showed tissue-specific differences. In adipose tissue, dialysate glycerol increased dose-dependently from 115±9 and 100±12 µmol/L to 149±12 and 131±13 µmol/l in the presence of L- and D-NAME, respectively (P=0.0438, Figure 1). At all Ang II concentrations used, dialysate glycerol concentrations were higher in the presence of L-NAME compared with D-NAME; however, the difference did not reach a significant value (P=0.0531). The relative changes in dialysate glycerol did not differ between L- and D-NAME. Addition of NP was followed by a decrease in dialysate glycerol down to
50 µmol/L (L-NAME=D-NAME). In muscle, Ang II induced a dose-dependent decrease in dialysate glycerol from
34 to 22 µmol/L (P<0.007), with no differences between L-NAME and D-NAME (Figure 1). After addition of NP, dialysate glycerol returned back to baseline level. Dialysate pyruvate increased dose-dependently during Ang II perfusion in muscle from
0.020 to 0.045 mmol/L (P=0.0002, L-NAME=D-NAME) (Figure 2). Correspondingly, the lactate/pyruvate ratio decreased dose-dependently from
55 to 26 (P=0.001, L-NAME=D-NAME) (Figure 2). Addition of NP led to a return of dialysate pyruvate concentration and lactate/pyruvate ratio back to baseline levels.
|
Norepinephrine
To test if Ang II is able to facilitate sympathetic neurotransmission, adipose tissue and muscle were perfused with increasing doses of either Ang II or isoproterenol. In adipose tissue, dialysate norepinephrine concentration increased from 0.33±0.08 (baseline) to 0.52±0.04 nmol/L (P<0.05) during perfusion with 0.01 µmol/L Ang II (Figure 3). Higher Ang II concentration did not lead to a further increase in dialysate norepinephrine concentration. Perfusion with isoproterenol induced a dose-dependent increase in dialysate norepinephrine concentration from 0.42±0.04 (baseline) to 1.74±0.30 nmol/L at 1 µmol/L. In muscle, dialysate norepinephrine concentration did not change at any Ang II concentration used (Figure 3). However, during perfusion with isoproterenol, dialysate norepinephrine concentration increased from 0.84±0.14 (baseline) to 2.09±0.16 at 1 µmol/L.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Even though interstitial Ang II did not have a major effect on tissue blood flow, it elicited marked metabolic changes in two functionally different tissues, namely white adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Ang II can bind to plasma membrane receptors on adipocytes but also on presynaptic fibers of sympathetic neurons enhancing transmitter release during nerve stimulation.22,23 Therefore, Ang II could influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism directly through an effect on receptors on adipocytes and indirectly through activation of receptors on presynaptic fibers of adrenergic neurons. A combination of both mechanisms could also occur. In our study, Ang II application did not lead to a major change in interstitial norepinephrine concentrations. In contrast, stimulation of presynaptic ß-2 adrenoreceptors increases interstitial norepinephrine markedly.20 However, the sensitivity of our method may not be sufficient enough to exclude a subtle effect of interstitial Ang II on norepinephrine turnover.
As indicated by the changes in dialysate glycerol concentrations, Ang II affected lipolysis in a tissue-specific manner: We observed a stimulation in adipose tissue but an inhibition in muscle, both dose-dependently. However, the increase in lipolysis with Ang II (+30%) was much weaker than the increase observed with isoproterenol (+300%).20 After binding of Ang II to its receptors, mainly Ang II type 1 (AT-1) receptors, various signal transduction systems are triggered, leading to an activation of phospholipases C, A2, and D, inhibition of adenylate cyclase, opening of calcium channels, or activation of tyrosine kinases.3 Inhibition of adenylate cyclase results in an inhibition of lipolysis and that could account for the antilipolytic effect of Ang II in muscle.24 Jones et al25 described a lipogenic effect of Ang II in differentiated murine 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and human adipocytes, along with increased expression and activity of the lipogenic enzymes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and fatty acid synthase. The lipogenic effect of Ang II found in adipocytes in vitro contrasts with the small lipolytic effect found in adipose tissue in vivo. It is unclear, however, whether the lipolytic effect in vivo is the consequence of the small but significant increase in dialysate norepinephrine during perfusion with Ang II or whether it is the result of some unspecific effects.
Blocking of NOS with L-NAME did not significantly modulate the Ang IIinduced effects. However, as has been demonstrated recently, the L-NAME concentration used is effective for blocking NOS.20 Obviously, endogenously produced NO is not sufficient to interact with Ang II. In contrast, the NO donor NP attenuated the Ang IIinduced effects on lipolysis. However, the NP concentration used is in the millimolar range and is effective to achieve maximum vasodilation. Therefore, the NP-induced effects can mostly be attributed to the increased tissue perfusion. In adipose tissue, dialysate glycerol decreased below baseline values. In skeletal muscle, dialysate glycerol increased close to baseline values. The glycerol decrease in adipose tissue is in line with the increase in blood flow that we observed and may indicate increased glycerol clearance. However, the glycerol increase in muscle close to baseline levels despite an increased blood flow indicates that NO activates basal lipolysis and counteracts the antilipolytic effect of Ang II. Gaudiot et al26 reported that NO exogenously added to isolated rat adipocytes stimulates basal lipolysis but inhibits stimulated lipolysis through cGMP-independent mechanisms that are tightly linked to the redox state of NO. Dialysate glycerol concentrations in adipose tissue tended to be increased with NOS inhibition. The lipolytic effect of NOS inhibition in adipose tissue in vivo is in contrast to the antilipolytic effect observed in adipocytes in vitro.27 However, NO is a tonic inhibitor of sympathetic nerve traffic, and inhibition of NOS is accompanied by an increase in both basal and stimulated lipolysis in adipose tissue in vivo, as has been shown recently.20
In addition to the effects on lipolysis, Ang II markedly changed carbohydrate metabolism in skeletal muscle. Dialysate lactate did not change during perfusion with Ang II, whereas dialysate pyruvate increased and lactate/pyruvate ratio decreased dose-dependently. A decrease in lactate/pyruvate ratio is consistent with an increase in aerobic glycolysis. On the other hand, the changes in dialysate lactate, pyruvate, and lactate/pyruvate ratio are consistent with a hypoglycemic situation: The lower availability of glucose is compensated by a greater efficiency of glucose metabolism.28 Muscle blood flow and glucose supply were not significantly affected by Ang II. Obviously, Ang II moderately impaired glucose uptake into the muscle, leading to a metabolic response similar to a hypoglycemic situation. This interpretation is in line with a recent report by Frossard et al,29 who found an improved glucose uptake into muscle after treatment of volunteers with inhibitors of either ACE or Ang II receptors.
The Ang II doses used in our study may result in higher tissue levels of Ang II than will normally be encountered in vivo. Maximum perfusate concentration of Ang II used in our study was
10-6 mol/L, whereas normal plasma concentration is
10x10-12 mol/L.30,31 However, local generation of Ang II may result in higher Ang II concentrations in the interstitium than encountered in the circulation. In fact, interstitial concentrations of Ang II in rat kidney are much higher than plasma concentrations.8 Furthermore, in vitro recovery of Ang II is
20% at a flow rate of 2 µL/min when using CMA/60 catheters. Recovery could be even lower in vivo. We did not test for that. It is possible, however, that 10% of Ang II of the perfusate diffuses into the interstitial space. Taking this into account, a perfusate concentration of 0.1 µmol/L Ang II would correspond to an interstitial concentration of
0.01 µmol/L, a value that is already within the physiological range. Thus, although we cannot completely rule out that some of the effects observed at the higher Ang II doses in our study represent the pharmacological rather than the physiological action of Ang II, the magnitude of the Ang II effect probably corresponds to the physiological response of both tissues to Ang II.
In conclusion, interstitially applied Ang II elicits rather weak hemodynamic and metabolic effects in adipose tissue, whereas it dose-dependently inhibits lipolysis and glucose uptake in muscle, independent of its hemodynamic effects. The metabolic effects are not modulated by endogenously produced NO. However, most of the effects are reversible when NOdonor NP is added to the perfusate.
Perspectives
Our data suggest a tissue-specific effect of Ang II regarding the regulation of lipolysis and glucose metabolism. Ang II has no major effect on tissue perfusion in adipose tissue and muscle when applied interstitially. However, lipolysis is weakly stimulated in adipose tissue but strongly inhibited in muscle by Ang II. Furthermore, Ang II stimulates pyruvate production, whereas lactate production is unchanged, resulting in an increase in lactate/pyruvate ratio in muscle. This observation indicates an impaired glucose supply into muscle, possibly caused by a partial inhibited glucose uptake. Possibly, this effect is even more pronounced in obesity and can, therefore, promote the development of obesity-associated insulin resistance. All these effects are probably mainly but not exclusively related to activation of Ang II receptors on adipocytes or muscle cells/fibers rather than changes in norepinephrine release through stimulation of receptors on the presynaptic fibers. Our findings are consistent with the idea that interstitial and intravascular Ang II concentrations in humans are regulated in part independently and serve different physiological functions. The physiology of interstitial Ang II in humans may not be revealed with intravascular studies. Instead, tissue investigations such as reported in this article will play an increasing role in elucidating local Ang IIrelated effects.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 3, 2002; first decision July 29, 2002; accepted October 9, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Engeli, M. Boschmann, P. Frings, L. Beck, J. Janke, J. Titze, F. C. Luft, M. Heer, and J. Jordan Influence of Salt Intake on Renin-Angiotensin and Natriuretic Peptide System Genes in Human Adipose Tissue Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1103 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boschmann, S. Engeli, F. Adams, G. Franke, F. C. Luft, A. M. Sharma, and J. Jordan Influences of AT1 receptor blockade on tissue metabolism in obese men Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): R219 - R223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cabassi, P. Coghi, P. Govoni, E. Barouhiel, E. Speroni, S. Cavazzini, A. M. Cantoni, R. Scandroglio, and E. Fiaccadori Sympathetic Modulation by Carvedilol and Losartan Reduces Angiotensin II-Mediated Lipolysis in Subcutaneous and Visceral Fat J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2888 - 2897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Engeli, J. Bohnke, K. Gorzelniak, J. Janke, P. Schling, M. Bader, F. C. Luft, and A. M. Sharma Weight Loss and the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Engeli, J. Janke, K. Gorzelniak, J. Bohnke, N. Ghose, C. Lindschau, F. C. Luft, and A. M. Sharma Regulation of the nitric oxide system in human adipose tissue J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1640 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Sharma Is There a Rationale for Angiotensin Blockade in the Management of Obesity Hypertension? Hypertension, July 1, 2004; 44(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Goossens, E. E. Blaak, W. H. M. Saris, and M. A. van Baak Angiotensin II-Induced Effects on Adipose and Skeletal Muscle Tissue Blood Flow and Lipolysis in Normal-Weight and Obese Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2690 - 2696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schroeder, F. Adams, M. Boschmann, J. Tank, S. Haertter, A. Diedrich, I. Biaggioni, F. C. Luft, and J. Jordan Phenotypical evidence for a gender difference in cardiac norepinephrine transporter function Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R851 - R856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |